Dishonorable White father compares his daughter’s racially motivated beating to “a grain of sand”

Posted by The video of the first attack on January 14, 2012, 12:38 PM | #

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ebc_1326488566

Posted by Liberal Heresy on January 14, 2012, 01:17 PM | #

I counted a few white faces there. What paralyses many Europeans from making any defence of themselves or their kin, it appears more than simple self-protection of name and body? If there is a strong residual ethnocentrism in Euros why does it not burn brightly when one of their kin is viciously attacked, especially a female. Why do parents feel obliged to disavow any racial motive, just public order oriented persuasion by law officials at a time of critical weakness?

A clear consensus of the psychological mechanisms operating here would be useful and in fact more widely, in why they will not make a defence of their extinction and usurpation bodily and politically, too.

Posted by Kievsky on January 14, 2012, 01:48 PM | #

Comment I made at Oregon Live that was deleted by the SWPL “journalist.”

What kind of sick man compares the savage beating of his daughter to “a grain of sand.” Clearly, Karley does not value her own life either, in insisting that this was not racially motivated, despite the fact that the attackers called her “white girl.”

You are looking at a classic case of Stockhold Syndrome. From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

In psychology, Stockholm Syndrome is an apparently paradoxical psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and have positive feelings towards their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.[1][2] The FBI’s Hostage Barricade Database System shows that roughly 27% of victims show evidence of Stockholm Syndrome.[3] The Syndrome is named after the Norrmalmstorg robbery of Kreditbanken at Norrmalmstorg in Stockholm, in which bank employees were held hostage from August 23 to August 28, 1973. In this case, victims became emotionally attached to their captors, and even defended them after they were freed from their six-day ordeal. The term “Stockholm Syndrome” was coined by the criminologist and psychiatrist Nils Bejerot, who assisted the police during the robbery, and referred to the Syndrome in a news broadcast.[4] It was originally defined by psychiatrist Frank Ochberg to aid the management of hostage situations.[5]

END QUOTE

The coming Martin Luther King Jr. holiday is reinforcement of the Stockholm Syndrome. All the white guilt propaganda pushed in schools, the anti-white television commercials and television shows and movies, the dogma that “white people are the cancer of history” as Susan Sontag said, leads to a 14 year old girl blaming herself for being attacked, and her father to value her life equivalent to “a grain of sand.”

People — you can break out of this anti-white cult! it’s nothing but an evil mind virus in your head that was implanted there by the mass media and educational system. There’s nothing to feel guilty about.

Do you realize that you are made to feel guilty for all the bad things you supposedly did, but you get ZERO credit for inventing modern civilization and inventing the whole concept of human rights?

Do people of color have a concept of human rights in places like Indonesia or Senegal? Due process? Political transparency? No way, man. Human rights violations and government corruption is the default mode of the world. Only white people are the exception.

In burdening ourselves with larger and larger numbers of non-whites, we risk losing all that we built and turning the US into a corrupt, Third World hellhole.

Aren’t you going to feel stupid in a decade or two when you are living in these ruins, and you look back and see what a craven coward you were in 2012?

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 14, 2012, 02:56 PM | #

Not all White people have Stockholm Syndrome, but when they take independent action, which is the only course of action available to them, their fellow Whites turn against them, just like commenters on this very website who couldn’t say anything about Emma West, except about her low class choice of words.

Matt Parrott showed us the same mindset when he made a recruitment video for his public demonstration in Indianapolis, but felt the need to limit the invitation to only those White people who share his tastes in wardrobe selection.

Watch the comments that will follow from this link to a news story about a White father who did not suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.

“Leo” is bound to chime in with his perennial insights about the liability of our association with “marginal types”.

Matt Parrott will wring his hands in speculation over whether or not the perp has a swastika tattoo on his chest, and how that kind of thing is holding him back.

And last but not least, GW will pronounce from on high that the man is a “psychopath”, and normalcy will be restored.

Watch.

Posted by Wolf on January 14, 2012, 06:56 PM | #

Clearly the Father wants to secure a conviction for the people who did this to his daughter.

He has figured out how the system works. If he so much as suggests that the crime was racially motivated a “procedural error” will suddenly derail the case (as commonly happens when a legal situation displeases the elite). He’s playing the game.

When you have children you can’t take the system head on, that’s how you will lose them. You have to play the rules.

Posted by Selous Scout on January 14, 2012, 06:57 PM | #

Insane.

I think future propaganda efforts will and must be limited to “lone wolves”.

I see a cliff in the distance. Where do I get off this train?

Posted by lolzlzlz on January 14, 2012, 07:10 PM | #

Keep it fair.

Yeah, Joseph Rose, keep it fair!

Judging by your response to me, you seem to have a sense of civility.

An entirely predatory civility.

Part of a civilized society is letting everyone respectfully share their views for all to see.

“Comments are now closed for this entry.”

Posted by CL on January 14, 2012, 09:25 PM | #

I propose an ‘Eloi Award’ for spineless Whites who display craven public cowardice such as this.

The father in South Carolina a few months back would be another recipient.

Think Darwin Award, but for egregious race-wimps who throw their own flesh & blood under the bus.

Posted by SHTF on January 14, 2012, 09:41 PM | #

“I see a cliff in the distance. Where do I get off this train?”

I think we’re all on this ride, whether we like it or not.

Posted by Lurker on January 14, 2012, 09:55 PM | #

In a field full of strong Eloi contenders I feel this one romps home across the finish line:

Amy Biehl

When 26-year-old Biehl drove a friend home to the township of Guguletu, outside Cape Town, on August 25, 1993, a black mob pelted her car with stones and smashed its windows while shouting racial epithets. Biehl was struck in the head with a brick, then dragged from her car and surrounded by a mob who stoned and stabbed her to death while she begged for her life. Four of Biehl’s murderers were convicted for her killing; however, in 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Biehl’s family supported release of the killers, and her father shook the murderers’ hands

Mr Biehl please step up to the stage to receive your award!

Its very hard not to see him as more repellent than her killers. Wtf is wrong with him?

(Im sure this story has been on MR before)

Posted by Ivan on January 14, 2012, 10:13 PM | #

My hope is not with Kievsky and people like him who, either with ill intentions or by virtue of their stupidity, are trying very hard to push whites vs non-whites paradigm onto the conscience of white individuals capable of some independent thinking. Whites vs non-whites is either a poorly conceived and self-defeating strategy of whites, or (infinitely more likely) a very well thought out and winning strategy of the Jews.

My real hope is with whites, like this fine individual, who managed to keep their souls in Hell: Why? Lyish? Lyish?

And I have no doubt that the bulk of ordinary white people are like him.

Posted by anon103 on January 14, 2012, 10:23 PM | #

Aren’t you going to feel stupid in a decade or two when you are living in these ruins, and you look back and see what a craven coward you were in 2012?

By that time I shall have grown used to the sight and smell of those ruins in daylight, and have public orgasms at the sight of those twinkling office lights in the skyscrapers at night.  Survival demands it.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 15, 2012, 12:21 AM | #

Not all White people have Stockholm Syndrome, but when they take independent action, which is the only course of action available to them, their fellow Whites turn against them, just like commenters on this very website who couldn’t say anything about Emma West, except about her low class choice of words.

Matt Parrott showed us the same mindset when he made a recruitment video for his public demonstration in Indianapolis, but felt the need to limit the invitation to only those White people who share his tastes in wardrobe selection.

Watch the comments that will follow from this link to a news story about a White father who did not suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.

“Leo” is bound to chime in with his perennial insights about the liability of our association with “marginal types”. (JIMMY MARR)

Mr. Marr:

I hope this “Leo” isn’t meant to be me ...

1. I hope you recall that I was one of the commenters defending Emma West.

2. I always support justified white resistance. I spent a good deal of time on that UK police blog last summer, defending a hard-edged response to the looters. I even once wrote a comment on some Oregon blog defending YOU and your right to speak freely.

3. I suspect Parrott is like me in recognizing that racial extremism, especially in appearance, simply repels the kind of normal people we need to reach to make a real difference (why does Jared taylor maintain a dress code at his conferences?). It’s actually a lot easier, professionally as well as psychologically, to parade around as an uncompromising, ‘hardcore’ of whatever persuasion (eg, look at Ron Paul vs Romney who’s actually trying to beat Obama, and not just make a public statement), than to try to craft a message that will appeal to the vast numbers of average whites that we’d better awaken if we (and they) are to have a future. Don’t assume that those who push for gradual radicalization are any less serious about the 14 words or the White Republic than more extreme and ‘theatrical’ types. We may be much more serious. 

4. If this father were to do something to these savages that lands him in jail, I would make an anonymous donation to his legal defense fund.

5. I think the savages in question ought to be executed, and failing that, at least prosecuted to the maximum extent of present law.

6. I dislike the white Stockholm Syndrome as much as you do.

Posted by Sector 19 on January 15, 2012, 01:32 AM | #

I hate to say it, but when you have White people like this (Father and Daughter) so hell-bent on denying race even in the face of physical onslaught—and the protective instinct of the Father sinking this far and subordinating itself to the PC zeitgeist—for many of these people it’s terminal. I mean, it’s not sustainable for them… In an era of over-abundance, we had the luxury of suffering these sorts of fools gladly and they were selected-in to the socio-evolutionary egalitarian consumer rat race we call “The West”.

Anywhere from a half to three quarters of White America will eventually sink below the waves over the next century or so through miscegenation, low birth rates, racial and political persecution, et. al. They are lost causes. They’re simply being burned off in the seething cauldron of 21st century Western liberal decadence.

The bright spot, though—if you can call it that—is that those Whites whom are left—the remaining third—will be much more resilient and will hopefully have learned their lesson by then and will have organized in their own explicit ethnic and cultural interests. If not, then checkmate.

Posted by The Man from SMUSH on January 15, 2012, 01:34 AM | #

Any black who behaved like this white sperm-donor (I refuse to call a male who likens his daughter’s racially motivated assault to a “grain of sand” a father) would be termed an “uncle tom” and shunned by blacks. White sycophants would also shun the black until he acknowledged his position as a superior black god.

Yet when whites are assaulted, there is only one expected behavior: subservience, and the refusal to acknowledge anything is wrong. It’s as if we have a gun to our collective heads.

I have been thinking for the past year that Whites are suffering from a race-wide Stockholm Syndrome. As a whole, we behave like a people that lust after domination and death. While I am sure the individual manifestation of Stockholm Syndrome could appear in members of any race, I have a feeling, if you could somehow test this, Whites would manifest it at higher rates and greater in severity than other races.

Posted by LOZLOZLOZZOOO on January 15, 2012, 03:20 AM | #

@The Man from SMUSH

It’s called the JQ.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 15, 2012, 06:06 AM | #

Comment I made at Oregon Live that was deleted by the SWPL “journalist.”

Yes. Even though I live in the area, I didn’t even waste my time trying to make a comment, and this brings up a possibility consider when we criticize the victim and victim’s family as sufferers of Stockholm Syndrome. I’m sure they do, in fact suffer from it, but probably not nearly to the extent this same SWPL “journalist” would like the public to believe.

I’ve been interviewed by these assholes on several occasions only to read an inversion of my general meaning in print on the following day. Unfortunately “no comment” is often the wisest response an inexperienced person can give to these social engineers.

From just glancing at the article and knowing a little about the political landscape in Portland, I would guess that some, including the interviewer himself, were trying to conflate this issue with a political discussion of the viability of taxpayer funded mass transit, which may indeed look like turning a grain of sand into a boulder from the father’s perspective. He is, after all, a landscaper.

As strange as it feels for me to say it, things may not be as bad as they look.

Posted by Papa Luigi on January 15, 2012, 07:01 AM | #

What we see in the videos of attacks such as Karley Buckland suffered is a vivid demonstration of a phenomenon that I have termed, ‘Organised Minority Advantage’ (OMA).

It is easy to demonstrate that whenever an organised minority operates within the realm of a disorganised majority, the effect is that the organised minority benefits disproportionately at the expense of the disorganised majority. The minority do not need to be cleverer, they do not need to be more skillfull, stronger or more courageous, they simply need to act as an organised group, acting in the interests of their group in preference to the interests of others, in order to benefit disproportionately.

The multiracial societies that exist in many parts of all Western nations now, present the level of ‘disorganisation’ necessary for organised minorities to flourish. A multiracial and multicultural society is effectively a society in which the core value, is that the society has no core values, and lacking values, there is no automatic cohesion between the individuals comprising such societies - and in the absence of any unifying force the individuals concerned become atomised.

With regard to inter-racial confrontations in public places and of tha kind that Karley Buckland was involved in, the White people involved do not step forward to defend the White victim of a racist attack; firstly, because on one level the core values with which they have been imbued by the society around them do not motivate them to put their individual safety at risk for the sake of another; and secondly because even where they feel some racial solidarity with the victim, they will have been made to think that they are in a very small minority of White people who think that way, and they will fear that if they do intervene they will have to contend with co-ordinated attack from a group of blacks, and should they be overwhelmed, they fear that no other White people will come to their aid. Indeed, once the racial motivation of any White person going to the aid of the victim becomes evident, there is always the possibility that the original White victim will side with the black attackers and turn on their rescuer, ‘horrified’ by the rescuer’s display of the ultimate ‘evil’ in our society - the ‘evil’ against which people of all ethnicities within our society have been taught to unite - White racist aggression.

Non-Whites are taught from childbirth to regard themselves as the victims of White racism and so they quickly acquire a keen sense of group solidarity, which quickly pays dividends. Inevitably therefore they act as an organised minority and instinctively react as a group to oppose any threat presented to any one of their number. Consequently, in the public arena, blacks know that should they be threatened in any confrontation, their racial compatriots will come to their aid. They can therefore afford to be recklessly bold in any confontational situation, whereas any White adversary knows they must remain prudently passive, unless they wish to invite attack from all sides.

Our mission must be to alert our people to these realities and to explain to them that White solidarity is not a matter of exhibiting group aggression for gratuitous or anti-social reasons, it is a matter of practicing behaviour that will prevent them and the ones they love from otherwise inevitably becoming victims, whether that be; victims of racial assaults; victims of racial discrimination when applying for education or employment; or victims of racial discrimination in any other sphere. We must make our people aware that multiracial and multicultural societies inevitably result in group on group, or group on individual racial discrimination, and that it will not be a matter of ‘if’ they ever suffer as a victim of racial discrimination, but simply ‘when’. They either exhibit and act upon the necessities of White solidarity or they condemn themselves to become lifes victims and losers.

Posted by Robert Reis on January 15, 2012, 09:19 AM | #

rabbis seem to be as unreliable as catholic priests on sexual abuse
January 15, 2012

Did rabbi downplay incest rape?
Telem Yahav, Ynet, Jan 14 2012

The State Prosecutor’s Office has filed an indictment this week against two brothers who molested their younger sister, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Friday. The abuse continued for years after a rabbi advised the parents against involving to the police, saying that such incidents “happen in many families.” The girl,14, was only 10 years old when her older brothers began sexually assaulting her. The eldest brother, 20, used to rape his sister regularly, while the younger of the two, 19, touched her inappropriately. When the parents discovered the horrifying abuse they consulted their rabbi, who advised them to deal with the issue at home. The parents claimed the rabbi told them they shouldn’t “make a big deal of it” because it is a common occurrence. The family kept the episodes secret for two years; meanwhile, the abuse continued. The case was uncovered when the minor told her psychologist about what her siblings had done. The therapist then informed the police. The older brother has been charged with rape, indecent acts and sodomy, while the younger one has been charged with indecent acts and attempted rape. The defendants’ attorneys, Yehuda Fried and Tal Gabay, said:

The accusations filed by the prosecution don’t reflect the truth. In any case, our clients chose many years ago to pursue a path of rehabilitation and treatment, and we believe that the court will choose this path as well.
  Leave a Comment » |  Uncategorized |  Permalink
Posted by niqnaq

————————————————————————————————————————

Posted by the Narrator... on January 16, 2012, 08:04 AM | #

Let’s be honest. We’re f*$@ed.

Portland is supposed to be one of the “Whitest cities in America”. Around 70%. Oregon is one of the Whitest states.

In it’s neighbor state of Washington, in rural America,

Yet this homespun place of 6,700 souls is also where a 25-year-old man was gunned down in broad daylight on a busy thoroughfare last spring, where cops had found a crowd of teenagers hiding a sawed-off shotgun in a couch several months earlier, and where the chief of police says a teenage girl was recently gang raped.

Nearby in Moses Lake last summer, U.S. marshals rounded up 50 suspected gang members — many of them with alleged ties to the Mexican Mafia.

Here is small-town Americana, a land of wide-open spaces, church socials and, increasingly, gang warfare.

....

the area logged nearly 100 robberies and shootings last year, all of them gang-related — including a 10-year-old boy shot in the head when his parents’ trailer was riddled with bullets, and a 13-year-old girl injured in a drive-by while she sat in her living room.

...
In a 30-day period this spring, there were four shootings, two home invasions and a homicide all linked to a single Moses Lake crew, according to the Sheriff’s Department, which has identified a dozen organized groups comprising more than 500 known gang members countywide.

At the annual Moses Lake Spring Festival, held Memorial Day weekend, Deputy Joe Harris was stunned at the number of young people brazenly displaying their gang colors.

...

Gang members have discovered that it is easy, here in the miles of emptiness, to travel at will, transporting guns and drugs and eluding law enforcement. With 2,700 square miles of open country patrolled by five sheriff’s deputies, there is no round-the-clock police presence in numerous towns…

...

 

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/pacificnw/2015674784_pacificpeastgangs31.html

.
.
.
.
This is happening in every state.

And yet people are worrying over Ron Paul and yet another engineered election cycle.

The fat lady has sung. And most of White America could care less.

...

Posted by danielj on January 16, 2012, 02:36 PM | #

This is happening in every state.

The fat lady has sung. And most of White America could care less.

Welcome to the ENDGAME.

This, my brothers, is a fine example of the only proper response to the situation: radical despair

Posted by Søren Renner on January 16, 2012, 05:22 PM | #

The Hour of Bewilderbeast is nigh. Lo, it is even at hand.

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 03:20 AM | #

Jimmy,

Being stupid is tough, and I’m sorry that you have to struggle with it. One way life could be easier for you is if you would not be so quick to attack or condemn people based on your limited and cracked critical thinking skills. For example, you could email me privately and ask me if I really actually think or do what you’ve concluded that I think or do. You could even go ahead and make the accusation, but not with the snarky tone befitting a teenage girl throwing a tantrum on Facebook [Yes, I get the irony. Fire with fire…].

While I don’t suffer from all-encompassing stupidity, I am indeed ignorant about a lot of things. When I’m ignorant about something, I try to avoid jumping to shitty little conclusions and attacking people who are on the same team as me based on my poorly informed speculation.

In summary…

Problem:

You’re stupid

Solution:

Shut up

Please don’t read further and please resist the urge to respond if you do disobey my request and read further. It will only confuse you. I’m going to explain my position to those people who fall within that range where they’re smart enough to think critically but not quite smart enough to stop visiting Majority Rights [Yes, I get the irony. Google Alerts…].

Matt Parrott showed us the same mindset when he made a recruitment video for his public demonstration in Indianapolis, but felt the need to limit the invitation to only those White people who share his tastes in wardrobe selection.

I believe there’s a continuum in the thinking on how to present ourselves to the public. I’ll identify what I believe to be four points along that continuum from Extreme Mainstreamers to Extreme Vanguardists.

Extreme Mainstreamers want to avoid offending their target audience, even to the point of refusing to admit that they’re pro-White and/or racialist (as that’s offensive to most people). They’re closeted. Some people have calculated that it’s not wise to take our own side in this argument. Some are infiltrating hostile institutions. Some are just cowards. Most are the latter pretending to be the former.

Reasonable Mainstreamers are constantly trying to offend their target audience as little as possible while standing firm on what they perceive to be the core issues. They’re not necessarily eager to throw the Nazis, Klansmen, and “the movement” under the bus, but they’re, by definition, never going to step out in front of the bus on behalf of those they believe could compromise the mission by unnecessarily offending their target audience.

Reasonable Vanguardists are those who more-or-less forfeit the pursuit of respectability or inoffensiveness within the contemporary sociocultural milieu. They believe it’s appropriate to dress and behave in a way that clearly and confidently distinguishes one from the mainstream. While they don’t necessarily load themselves up with the baggage of every single failed movement and subculture that preceded them, they can and will do things like explain that the Second Klan was instrumental in curbing early attempts to cram through open borders or that the NS had some sensible and successful policies and that their actual legacy is obscured by post-war propaganda.

Extreme Vanguardists are those who either through stupidity or through suffering from some misanthropic condition actually offend and alienate Whites on purpose, as the point. It’s an exhibitionist fetish, if not necessarily sexual. Being the target of a very powerful taboo creates a challenge which is somewhat unique to our political faction: people participating because they get off on being alienated, on being the pariah. White Nationalism is the new Satanism. These toxic personalities can be disposed of very easily by simply insisting that they dress in a presentable manner and maintain a family-friendly language and tone at meet-ups.

Decent non-stupid non-toxic people intuitively understand that dressing and behaving in a manner which distracts from the intended focus of the event is inappropriate and rude to the rest of the participants. Stupid and/or toxic people throw a tantrum and storm off, angry that they’re not being allowed to hijack an event that others have invested a lot of time and energy in. If they’re not allowed to take your anti-immigration rally and turn it into their platform to carry on about Zyklon B in their stormtrooper costume, then you’re starving the parasite of the very thing he feeds on: negative attention.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 18, 2012, 04:19 AM | #

Matt Parrott,

Well said, though I also made a somewhat similar observation above:

3. I suspect Parrott is like me in recognizing that racial extremism, especially in appearance, simply repels the kind of normal people we need to reach to make a real difference (why does Jared taylor maintain a dress code at his conferences?). It’s actually a lot easier, professionally as well as psychologically, to parade around as an uncompromising, ‘hardcore’ of whatever persuasion (eg, look at Ron Paul vs Romney who’s actually trying to beat Obama, and not just make a public statement), than to try to craft a message that will appeal to the vast numbers of average whites that we’d better awaken if we (and they) are to have a future. Don’t assume that those who push for gradual radicalization are any less serious about the 14 words or the White Republic than more extreme and ‘theatrical’ types. We may be much more serious.

I like your quadrapartite taxonomy. I would classify myself as a “Reasonable Mainstreamer”. I will never back down from bringing attention to the forces extirpating white society, but I think it profoundly unproductive, as well as personally distasteful, to associate with groups more interested in making theatrical appearances than in actually trying to increase white empowerment. This is serious business, and we need serious men to conduct it.

On the other hand, that doesn’t mean that Marr and NSM don’t also play a productive role. The more persons joining NSM, the larger their demonstrations, the more it makes persons like me look reasonable (which I believe I am, objectively considered). I realize some might reach exactly the opposite conclusion - that normal and moral persons calling legit attention to white grievances are harmed by association with Nazis, but I think that’s only the case where the latter hijack, as you say, events sponsored by the former. I’m not sure why this might be in terms of scientific psychology, but I’m convinced historically that the queer extremists of ACT-UP somehow legitimized the more ordinary and ‘moderate’ homos. Many thought at the time that the ACT-UP extremists would simply alienate mainstream society against all gays, but that’s not what transpired at all.

The other useful role that NSM can play is in providing morally and psychologically marginal whites, esp youth, the opportunity to be involved with something racially useful. Better to have these types racially militarized and brought within the fold of a racially helpful solidarity, than to leave them to their own devices, getting high, laid, and into senseless trouble. NSM I think may also, or at least could, play a very important function in protecting white activists who land in prison (as well as lessening the psychological costs from white activism by establishing prison presences, such that mainstream white activists have less to worry about if incarcerated). Perhaps this is an area about which you or Jimmy know more than I.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 18, 2012, 07:47 AM | #

I believe there’s a continuum in the thinking on how to present ourselves to the public.

That’s fine, Matt. And, its also fine if you want to devote 1K words to its delineation, but I prefer the simplicity of a binary continuum: “pro-White” vs. “anti-White”

When we distance ourselves from other pro-White activists because we fear they will endanger our social mobility, mainstream political prospects, and collaborative potential with Jews, we’re not really functioning as pro-White activists. We’re functioning as class warriors.

I was forced to make this distinction several years ago when I was presenting weekly lectures at University of Oregon, and a small but loyal contingent of my audience became composed of NSM members who attended in regulation BDUs.

Like you, I could have banished them to ensure the maximization of my tenure, but I realized that any tenure under those circumstances would have been hypocritical with respect to my representation of myself as a White racialist.

It’s a tough choice, but I don’t think things aren’t going to improve for our race until more of us are willing to make it.

You’re young yet, and full of youthful ambitions. Give yourself some time. Maybe listen to Søren’s interview yesterday on VOR in which he insisted on the necessity of despair as the precursor to change.

Billions will die. We will win.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 08:36 AM | #

I’m going to explain my position to those people who fall within that range where they’re smart enough to think critically but not quite smart enough to stop visiting Majority Rights

I suppose we should just shut the site down then and head on over to Occidental Dissent and Hoosier Nation

I’ll identify what I believe to be four points along that continuum

Why stop at four?

(why does Jared taylor maintain a dress code at his conferences?)

There are dress codes at NSM rallies too. There are dress codes everywhere. It isn’t because Jared Taylor is some kind of fucking genius.

We may be much more serious.

Serious about your 401k. Fuck off. Gradual Radicalization is an oxymoron if I’ve ever heard one.

Maybe listen to Søren’s interview yesterday on VOR in which he insisted on the necessity of despair as the precursor to change.

He got all Kierkegaard/Antinora on that bitch huh? Too bad I got home too late. I’ll have to listen tonight.

We’re functioning as class warriors

Bingo.

Don’t you get it Jimmy?

If these people had their finger on the eugenic button we’d be sterilized! And I don’t even own any NS regalia! They hate us. They hate everything about us. They are lords in the imaginary fiefdom already. All they care about is their Waffle Houses, Quaker Steak and Lubes and their microwaveable industrial precursors that they call “food.”

There must be deflation in the caloric currencies markets. The fat will starve fast. They are a far greater threat to our racial survival than the costume clowns.

We are utterly and completely alone.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 08:37 AM | #

The end of the fiat carbohydrate is the sine qua non of the Great Awakening.

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 09:55 AM | #

Leon,

I will never back down from bringing attention to the forces extirpating white society, but I think it profoundly unproductive, as well as personally distasteful, to associate with groups more interested in making theatrical appearances than in actually trying to increase white empowerment. This is serious business, and we need serious men to conduct it.

I agree, though I would ask you to keep an open mind about what constitutes “seriousness” and bear in mind that there’s an important difference between a radically different subculture and an assortment of exhibitionist fools. Throughout history, groups drawing a sharp contrast between themselves and the prevailing order in both style and rhetoric have often succeeded where “reformers” have failed.

Regarding the NSM, I have put a hypergraphic explosion of words on the Internet. One can impugn the quality of it, but I believe I have an impressive quantity of words scattered about thousands of topics on several dozen sites. There are literally millions of words, and I don’t believe a single one of them is used to attack the NSM. I believe the NSM subject is a bit more complicated than is portrayed and I believe the NSM itself has taken pains to avoid alienating its target audience and insists on a code of dress and behavior at its events.

Posted by anon on January 18, 2012, 10:04 AM | #

I’m not sure why this might be in terms of scientific psychology, but I’m convinced historically that the queer extremists of ACT-UP somehow legitimized the more ordinary and ‘moderate’ homos. Many thought at the time that the ACT-UP extremists would simply alienate mainstream society against all gays, but that’s not what transpired at all.

The Left use their extremists. They keep them at arm’s length but they use them to create outliers and widen the scope of debate. “We disagree with their tactics but…” The Right run away from theirs which then narrows the scope of debate but that’s partly down to a hostile media.

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 10:19 AM | #

Jimmy,

When we distance ourselves from other pro-White activists because we fear they will endanger our social mobility, mainstream political prospects, and collaborative potential with Jews, we’re not really functioning as pro-White activists. We’re functioning as class warriors.

If we were distancing ourselves from other pro-White activists for the reasons you stated, then we would indeed be morally compromised (and even effectively anti-White) “class warriors”. But every subculture and faction within the movement has the right to define itself. Perhaps a Randroid libertarian racialist would be discouraged from joining the NSM because his pro-capitalist and Jew-inspired “live and let die” philosophy is incompatible with NS philosophy. Perhaps a Calvinist kinist racialist would discourage an LDS racialist from joining because of theological incompatibilities.

There are going to be different and largely incompatible factions within any movement which seeks to represent an entire race. As long as they don’t invest so much energy in attacking one another that they fail to unite against the common enemy, then there’s no point in trying to impose an unworkable working relationship on the diverse factions. We don’t all have to get along. And that’s good, because we couldn’t if we tried. Let different people do their different things.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 11:53 AM | #

Matt,

My state would punish any public worship of false gods with execution. I’m not discouraging you from anything except blasphemy.

There are no such things as “persons” or “different people” Matt. And, letting these individual, ineffable and precious souls do “as they wilt” is the defining characteristic of modernity. It is also, tellingly, the first commandment in the Satanic Bible.

Calorie restriction and theonomy are the only things that keep us in line Matthew.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 12:35 PM | #

The Left use their extremists.

There are no such thing as “extremists” in my opinion.

What there are, are actors in history. Anyone not acting, not being extreme, is simply caught up in the flow of the action where they remain condemned to feminine passivity. In this respet, Medea Benjamin is as much a man as Anders Brevik.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 12:47 PM | #

But every subculture and faction within the movement has the right to define itself.

Lollzlolzllllozoozzzllies!

Straight outta the fucking UN Declaration on Human Rights.

Don’t you mean subculture and fraction? Every infintesimal, self-defining fraction of a fraction is a a splinter under my fingernail. Don’t you see how we end up right back where we started; i.e. individualism?

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 12:53 PM | #

danielj said…

Blah blah blah Mormonism is Satanism blah blah blah I would kill you for blasphemy if I were king blah blah blah equating patience and discipline with passivity and femininity blah blah blah

One shouldn’t confuse an extreme commitment to the cause with extreme actions. Extreme actions like Breivik’s definitely suggest extreme commitment. But, as the aftermath of his actions demonstrate, the extremely committed activist’s cause isn’t always served best by extreme actions.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 12:59 PM | #

But, as the aftermath of his actions demonstrate, the extremely committed activist’s cause isn’t always served best by extreme actions.

No shit. I wasn’t saying he was right Matthew.

Blah blah blah Mormonism is Satanism blah blah blah I would kill you for blasphemy if I were king blah blah blah equating patience and discipline with passivity and femininity blah blah blah

I didn’t equate Mormonism with Satanism. You didn’t even read what I wrote. I did call it blasphemy.

How overweight are you Parrott? Don’t lie because I’m meeting you soon.

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 01:01 PM | #

danielj said…

Don’t you see how we end up right back where we started; i.e. individualism?

No. Allowing and encouraging distinct discursive spaces protects more radical factions which rejected very basic Western values like individualism from the compromising and watering down which necessarily occurs for a sweeping alliance of disparate factions to move forward as one group. Focused radical factions with a precise ideology and strategy stand to lose more from collaborating with a broad network of White Advocates as the broad network has to lose from being associated with radicals.

Your commitment to kill me when you get the chance proves my point. In order to achieve our shared goal, we can and should work separately in separate factions until the common enemy has been defeated. After that occurs, we can go back to being at each others’ throats.

Posted by Matt Parrott on January 18, 2012, 01:08 PM | #

I’m 5’11” and weigh 225lbs, My BMI is just barely in the “obese” category as opposed to merely being “overweight”. I am obese. I regularly eat at McDonald’s. It’s been months since I last exercised. You’re probably more lean and more handsome than I, and I’ll gladly congratulate you on a successful diet and lament my poor nutritional habits in person if that’s what’s important to you.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 01:19 PM | #

You’re probably more lean and more handsome than I, and I’ll gladly congratulate you on a successful diet and lament my poor nutritional habits in person if that’s what’s important to you.

No Matthew. Not at all. What’s important is divesting this website and the internet of its psychic significance. You’re spellbound. You’re chained up to this thing, this hydra-headed, solid-state silicon and germanium inversion of reality.

We aren’t important. This is entertainment.

It is important that you get in shape and eat right. More important than your river of words. More important than “White Nationalism” Matt. Concentric circles of responsibility. White Nationalism starts at home. Being handsome and in shape and having children who have that as an example is the one needful thing.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 01:21 PM | #

Your commitment to kill me when you get the chance proves my point.

No. My commitment is to reeducate you. I have no desire to murder you or administer capital punishment.

I was using the issue to make a point about the Law.

Man you’re a sensitive little bitch. All that fat is increasing the estrogen in your system.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 18, 2012, 03:03 PM | #

Matt, the reason I don’t send you private emails is because I place a premium on your public presence here at MR. If acting like a teenage girl on Fb is what it takes to draw you in, it’s a nasty job, somebody’s got to do it.

Now, if you’ll forgive me, I’m all out of snarkiness for the moment, and thanks to Danielj, am forced to spend some saddle-time on my exercise bike, which I love in the same way I love my relationship with you.

Siege Heil. Billions will die. We will win.

Posted by lolzlzlz on January 18, 2012, 04:02 PM | #

In order to blab blab blab blab, we can and should yon yon yon yon yon until the zozozoozllzozz has lolzoozozzlolzozlzoozozz. After that occurs, we can blah blah blah blah blah blah.

the same chap who wrote “with a whimper” now interprets our great disadvantage — phenotypic diversity as it ramifies ideologically — as a strength.

http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publications/DonaldsonMatasciEtAl08.pdf

billions will eat fiat carbs. we will too.

Posted by lolzlzlz on January 18, 2012, 04:10 PM | #

my great fear, what keeps me up at night — apart from free sexytime webcam streams from chinese girls’ bedrooms — is that uh and danielj are right: beetroot, prayer, and public beheadings are the soundest practices for whitekind to recover from the demographic shit-storm. “retake control of the money supply” is an empty exhortation, equivalent to “death to the jews”, in fact presupposing each other. zozozozoz. alfred wegener was mocked for decades for the theory of plate tectonics, and here too, it is a great shift in ideological tectonics alone that can pull us up from the morass of liberalism with its wussy “discursive spaces” and anti-muslim “fairness” crusades. matt parrott, i counsel you to hardness, not tolerance. single combat to the death with danielj. you have one month.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 18, 2012, 04:37 PM | #

It is important that you get in shape and eat right. More important than your river of words. More important than “White Nationalism” Matt. Concentric circles of responsibility. White Nationalism starts at home. Being handsome and in shape and having children who have that as an example is the one needful thing. (danielj)

If whites who understand the racial problem only focus on themselves, even if that includes child-rearing, then the race will lose. The contribution Matt or I could make by having a few kids each is infinitesimal compared to the influence we could have through our writing. Far more whites have children than understand racial issues. Those children then all too often grow up as indoctrinated liberals.

We’re not going to win this thing “one family at a time”, let alone “producing one family at a time”. The numbers of aliens invading our ecological niche(s) are just too great. What we need is a whole lot of intelligent and articulate people out there working for mass conversions to racial sanity. Intellectual racialist websites serve as gateways to interest higher quality types in The Cause.

This seems so obvious I may not understand what you’re actually getting at.

Posted by lolzlzlz on January 18, 2012, 05:37 PM | #

lolwut

so is this constantin’s girlfriend?

http://www.cyberwit.net/authors/katya-ganeshi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_LcF9vecTY

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 18, 2012, 07:13 PM | #

Hoosier schmoozers get new plates for their cruisers.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 09:04 PM | #

If whites who understand the racial problem only focus on themselves, even if that includes child-rearing, then the race will lose.

The “race” doesn’t exist and the barely perceptible detritus (the Hallerian “Wailing Wall”, crumbling remains of the “Western Civilization”) that remains standing cannot be said to possess hardly anything, even satisfactory DNA as far as I can deduce, to lose.

The contribution Matt or I could make by having a few kids each is infinitesimal compared to the influence we could have through our writing.

Poor boy. Keep rationalizing the evolutionary dead-end that is Haller.

Who are you followers? Your converts? Point me to your work please! You’re not a fucking intellectual and you don’t have what it takes. On top of that, your bull shit about synthesizing “Catholic Ethics” and “White Nationalism” is nothing but mental masturbation. It was already finished 1,500 years ago anyway. Perfected by Aquinas and culminated in the thought of de Maistre. You’re wasting our fucking time with your bull shit.

Far more whites have children than understand racial issues. Those children then all too often grow up as indoctrinated liberals.

They’ve tasted the fruit.

We’re not going to win this thing “one family at a time”, let alone “producing one family at a time”.

We aren’t going to win this thing at all.

The numbers of aliens invading our ecological niche(s) are just too great.

Q.E.D.

What we need is a whole lot of intelligent and articulate people out there working for mass conversions to racial sanity.

What we need is nuclear weapons. We don’t have them and we never will. Lacking that, I propose that what “we” need is a massive reduction in the food supply.

Intellectual racialist websites serve as gateways to interest higher quality types in The Cause.

Higher quality types are the types that got us into this mess.

This seems so obvious I may not understand what you’re actually getting at.

Let me spell it out for you:

IT’S ALL OVER. WE FAILED. HAVE KIDS. RAISE THEM RIGHT.

Only poor people, subsistence farmer with a tendency to orient their whole life toward reconciliation with the infinite are capable of creating healthy societies. A little bit of backyard dentistry will cure you of your weakness.

Posted by Lurker on January 18, 2012, 09:29 PM | #

Higher quality types are the types that got us into this mess.

Lol! Definitely something in that. For myself, I dont think we dont need more high quality types, we just need more of us of whatever ‘quality’

IT’S ALL OVER. WE FAILED. HAVE KIDS. RAISE THEM RIGHT.

Im doing my best.

Posted by danielj on January 18, 2012, 09:46 PM | #

White Trashionalist.

The line is drawn.

Posted by Silver on January 19, 2012, 12:58 AM | #

danielj,

Seriously, stfu. You are a prickly, absurdly self-important abject moron.  If people are unwilling to grant serious consideration to the views of a Leon Haller they’re obviously going to be a few thousand times less likely still to grant serious consideration to the views of a nut like you.

Hardly needs to be said, of course, but your invincible idiocy just grates and grates and grates so I had to speak up.  (Wish more people would.)

Anyway, I hate to end on a sour note, so I’ll offer this word of advice: learn your place—more good will come of it than you think.

Posted by danielj on January 19, 2012, 08:37 AM | #

Oh Silver! What was I thinking? You’re so right and I’m so wrong… I’m ashamed. I know “we’ve had our moments” but I beseech thee! Teach me the path of the omniscient and very liquid/safe one! What kind of drugs and/or therapy would you recommend to cure me of my insanity?

How the fuck can you even disagree with me? You think Haller’s an intellectual? You think White Nationalists are going to capture the flag? Don’t be a faggot. You’re not a cock sucker are you?

Posted by danielj on January 19, 2012, 08:54 AM | #

Don’t worry though my boy. I’m taking another one of my extended absences.

Ya’ll know how to reach me.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 19, 2012, 09:17 AM | #

danielj,

You’re not stupid, but, whatever your impressive professional accomplishments, you are very psychologically immature - a true sophomore. I don’t know why you feel the need to vent on certain people (like me), but for the serious here, it’s such a waste of time. A year ago I might have responded to your volleys, but I’m really just too bored. Who cares? Life is short, and there is so much more worthwhile to do, including within nationalism, than engaging in endless bickering.

I haven’t written very much here in the last few months. This is not solely due to my being back in school and thus busier than previously. I fear I find less and less that merits comment.

As to whether I’m an intellectual, well, that’s why I’m back in school, doing the early coursework preparatory to a doctorate. Know that over the years I have had many magazines and websites, upon receiving some letter to the editor or online comment of mine, contact me and ask if I’d like to write or post for them (that has included MR, btw). Know also I’m a graduate of one of the perennially recognized six best American universities (Caltech, MIT, Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Stanford - though sometimes smaller schools like Amherst and Williams actually beat one or the other of these Top Six in freshmen SAT scores). At my university, I had several leading professors (ie, men with named chairs) strongly encourage me to pursue a scholar’s life. Regrettably, I went the professional route.

Anyway, whatever my deficiencies might be, it would be pretty apparent to my professors, or higher cognitive types more generally, that I am a lot more intelligent than you. Granted, you don’t attempt to write much of substance, so it’s a bit difficult to judge. But you are so very clearly a certain type - the sophomoric autodidact who thinks he’s a lot more knowledgeable than he is, and whose misunderstanding of what constitutes real intellectualism is painfully obvious. 

I judge people by the standard of moral character. I consider white racial loyalty a sign of at least the possibility of good character. Moreover, insofar as saving the race is, I believe, a precondition to preserving the West, and insofar as saving the West is a gift to all humanity, and thus a profoundly moral task, I am willing to cut even fairly reprobate WNs a lot of slack. Even if dirtbags, they are on the side of the angels, and that counts for a great deal with me.

My point is that I think WNs should try to follow Reagan’s famous “11th Commandment” - “Thou shalt not criticize a fellow Republican [WN]”. If you look at my comments over time, I try to abide by that. I don’t castigate others except where they first have been forensically or rhetorically unfair to me. Perhaps you should adopt that approach.

Posted by Mr Voight on January 19, 2012, 09:26 AM | #

Too any youngsters reading this, follow danielj’s advice. He speaks the brutal truth. Eat well, lift weights, mock hard, breed well and raise your children right.

Don’t get mentally bogged down in trying to ‘save’ a race that doesn’t want to be saved.

You are the race. The rest of them are a bunch of walking dead submissives. They won’t be around forever. Follow the advice above and you will be.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 19, 2012, 10:38 AM | #

Good synopsis, Mr. Voight.

Posted by Liberal Heresy on January 19, 2012, 11:33 AM | #

Anyway, whatever my deficiencies might be, it would be pretty apparent to my professors, or higher cognitive types more generally, that I am a lot more intelligent than you. Granted, you don’t attempt to write much of substance, so it’s a bit difficult to judge. But you are so very clearly a certain type - the sophomoric autodidact who thinks he’s a lot more knowledgeable than he is, and whose misunderstanding of what constitutes real intellectualism is painfully obvious.

Leon, it is not my intention to break Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment so please believe me that my intention below is not to be unkind.

You have made an argument on numerous occasions here for your having the raw material or perhaps the internal machinery to produce something of worth, greater than many others contributing here or elsewhere. But AFAIK from witnessing your general output over the last few months, you seem to rehash a narrow set of similar themes on MR at a surface level without developing them into something of depth or compelling insight. No doubt you do not see things this way.

Your comment the other day regarding a defence of you view of economics: that you needed to collect together the Austrian textbooks that you own on the subject to answer what you believe on the issue was telling. We almost all to some degree base our evaluations on the working out of others, life is too short for the level of complexity otherwise, and yet..

If we are denigrating others due to the absence of some demonstrable written substance while upholding oneself as an challenger then it is fair to ask for evidence.

Consequently I finally arrive at my point:

Can I please ask you to direct me to one worked out piece of about 500 words of which you are most proud. This can exist anywhere on the web or on your hard drive.

Posted by Lurker on January 19, 2012, 01:43 PM | #

I fear Dan, Mr. V & Jimmy may be right and its what I try to do with my offspring. But I still feel we have to keep plugging away, to wake people up.

Posted by danielj on January 19, 2012, 03:32 PM | #

You’re not stupid

No shit. Although I don’t value your opinion at all so thanks for fuck all.

you are very psychologically immature - a true sophomore.

A there’s a real zinger! I’ve never played the “you’re a perpetual adolescent!” game before. Yawn. What the fuck does “psychologically immature” even mean? You’re just throwing around words.

I don’t know why you feel the need to vent on certain people (like me), but for the serious here, it’s such a waste of time.

On the contrary, for the serious, my daily demolition of you is very instructive.

Life is short, and there is so much more worthwhile to do, including within nationalism, than engaging in endless bickering.

Certainly isn’t worthwhile to have children and raise them right is it?

White nationalism is endless bickering you fucking momo.

As to whether I’m an intellectual, well, that’s why I’m back in school,

They don’t make em there anymore bud. Hate to break it to you.

Do you know Latin Leon?

Know that over the years I have had many magazines and websites, upon receiving some letter to the editor or online comment of mine, contact me and ask if I’d like to write or post for them (that has included MR, btw).

Ladeefuckindah. You’re pathetic. You are truly almost not worth saving. Do you realize how fucking silly and childish you sound?

Know also I’m a graduate of one of the perennially recognized six best American universities (Caltech, MIT, Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Stanford - though sometimes smaller schools like Amherst and Williams actually beat one or the other of these Top Six in freshmen SAT scores).

I’ll believe it when I see your degree.

Regardless, unless you graduated in hard science - and we all know you didn’t - we can assume you graduated with some bull shit degree where the grades are all inflated and everybody graduates summa cum laude. Yawn. A degree is not an accomplishment. Martin Luther King Jr. had one.

At my university, I had several leading professors (ie, men with named chairs) strongly encourage me to pursue a scholar’s life. Regrettably, I went the professional route.

Thank God for that. I might have actually had to plow over your thesis a couple years from now had you stayed on track. Now I have at least a decade until you get that done.

Anyway, whatever my deficiencies might be, it would be pretty apparent to my professors, or higher cognitive types more generally, that I am a lot more intelligent than you.

It isn’t apparent to anybody except you and Silver (when he’s butt hurt at me). Howzaboutz we take an online I.Q. test and post the results? Take a vote? Although it really doesn’t fucking matter Leon. I don’t have the same fetish that you do. I’m not intimated by I.Q. scores.

But you are so very clearly a certain type - the sophomoric autodidact who thinks he’s a lot more knowledgeable than he is, and whose misunderstanding of what constitutes real intellectualism is painfully obvious. 

So easy to write somebody off that way isn’t it? I could say the same ridiculous shite about you and we’d both be playing our roles. What I’m saying is not that I’m an intellectual but that I have no problem picking them out and you ain’t nuthin but a fucking poser.

My point is that I think WNs should try to follow Reagan’s famous “11th Commandment” - “Thou shalt not criticize a fellow Republican [WN]”. If you look at my comments over time, I try to abide by that.

Ronald Reagan was a fucking dirtbag and I don’t give a shit about anything he said or did.

Perhaps you should adopt that approach

No. And you aren’t a White Nationalist. Stop saying you are.

Posted by aurio on January 19, 2012, 08:41 PM | #

While it is heartbreaking what happened to that girl and despicable for that supposed father to disregard his own daughter’s life like that, I am slightly more worried about the comments below the article that actually have pro white white people fighting each other while clear stockholm syndrome is going on on a racial level for white people, globally.

We all have our own ideas on what religions, political beliefs, and even the attire a white nationalist should have, THAT IS NEVER GOING TO CHANGE.

We have to accept that white nationalism is a movement comprised of the most extremely individualistic people on earth, we will actually get more done if we spread out and attack the anti white system from all sides, corners, alleys etc, sure it is great to talk with other white nationalists about things, but don’t try to influence people who are ALREADY ON YOUR SIDE.

Until you see pro white sites getting hundreds of millions of members it is best not to scare away dozens or even hundreds of whites away from sites with only a few thousand at most.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 20, 2012, 08:05 AM | #

Can I please ask you to direct me to one worked out piece of about 500 words of which you are most proud. This can exist anywhere on the web or on your hard drive. (Liberal heresy)

I suppose I could load a recent paper from last semester. But I’m a private chap. I prefer sticking with what I’ve written for public consumption on the web.

I’ve written a lot of comments here at MR, beginning perhaps 3 (?) years ago. Please search them. I wrote a lot at one time at the Chronicles site. Some were very long. One caused Jared Taylor to contact me, asking if I’d like to expand it for an AR piece. I don’t really save them, though you might be able to find them. I wrote a really long response to one of Notus Wind’s essays on China in perhaps 2010 - certainly 500 words or more (of course, it wasn’t a formal paper or even post). Search that one. I’ve written some long comment threads on White Zion, as well as (some of) my views on Christianity and WN, that I like.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 20, 2012, 08:07 AM | #

danielj,

You bore me. Find something interesting and original to say, and you might engage my attention.

Posted by Robert Reis on February 02, 2012, 08:17 AM | #

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021604.html

Another white woman who doesn’t read VFR is murdered by her black boyfriend

Posted by Rick on March 01, 2012, 01:44 PM | #

Papa Luigi,

That was undoubtedly the finest explanation of the psychology of how organized minority groups operate in the larger society, and I didn’t have to read through volumes of drivel to find it either. Your are “spot on” in all points and so well articulated. If you don’t have a PhD, you certainly have the aptitude!