Je ne suis pas Dieudonné - a Rejection of The Right’s Negrophilia and Dividing Against Whites Some Mulatto with a White French mother (and White French girlfriend) intimates a stiff-arm salute and right-wing revisionism and he’s one of us? I think not. Jews are bad for us. Ok, enough evidence. But from there the right goes on to stretch the inference, to where blacks are ok. ? Some are wise to the J.Q., some are separatists who need guidance to help the rest understand that we only want separation as well, not their exploitation, but to kiss their ass and act like they are in our interest group? Give us a break. To make matters worse, the right not only typically panders to blacks, but condemns Southern and Eastern Europeans as not being in our interest group. The right has the hallmarks of a lack of courage and a general policy of pandering. Among that, the right pander to negrophilic inclinations and diversions coming from females (the problem is only the “Muslims” or only the “Jews”) to mask their cowardice of standing up for our European people. They admire Dieudonné. This perspective is allowed by female gate-keepers to Jewish and corporate power, and their divide and conquer as it augurs to have Europeans fighting one another; pandering to the basest puerile female inclination of incitement to competition - “don’t worry about those pretty mudsharks, or those rabid blacks getting over”, it doesn’t bother some White woman, whose fat-ass is in a powerful control point and can drive a hard bargain as a result. And they (right-wingers) don’t wonder why Atzmon thinks Dieudonné is wonderful? Je ne suis pas Dieudonné They might be able to get through female gate-keepers some, get on one side of a divide and conquer in their incitement - e.g., as favored by a particular group of European females. That is a dubious strategy, let alone of merit as a battle plan. The troops, the people in full, as it were, must be grounded in their cause and authentically motivated as they will not be sufficiently, only focused on Jews. When you tell a young man that the tossing aside of what he is born to see as his ultimate treasure is not an important problem, or that some Mulatto with a lovely French wife is OK, simply because he coddles Faurisson’s focus on gas chambers and memes some covert intimation of a stiff-arm salute, how is that supposed to help his morale and address his concrete, fundamental concerns? And how is it supposed to gain her respect? Never mind an appropriate White woman for him. We hate Jews! Now that’s inspiration! We can see who these self described elite don’t like. Who do they care about? Not White women, obviously, apparently not White men. Perhaps one other guy, one with E1b1b, if not the Jew on a stick ..besides perhaps advancement of their own position. The last time I was in Paris, I had planned to stay five days but could only manage two. I was so absolutely disgusted, outraged to see the kind of women whom I might dream of, only to see them with blacks. I had to get out, retreat to save my sanity. Some right-wingers are saying we have to drop everything, basically adopt blacks and others as a part of our interest group and focus only on Jews. Blacks are OK, mudsharks are just genetically defective. Talk about someone whose balls have shriveled-up. This is a woman of German descent, I care that she not do this and believe that she is not genetically defective – don’t you believe she has been corrupted?
Until fairly recently, I wondered to myself what were the genetic components among European women that made them most resistant to out-breeding. It was an intriguing question to me. It still is, to a limited extent. To my surprise, I found myself changing - upon a more complete survey of what is going on. I do believe that corruption of the culture and rule structure is the deeper concern. There are just too many Europeans who were perfectly good for centuries who are suddenly doing this, rupturing their ancient lines – it cannot all be written-off as genetic defects. It is a second black plague, but coming from different rats and using cultural auspices as its vector. This is not time for the medieval medicine of Christianity nor of scientism for that matter. While being against the Jew is absolutely necessary and a primary concern, an antagonist of ours second to none, that is not a full culture, not even a grounding of an army to fight. The hermeneutic perspective implied by Majority Rights would be, as it premises our outlook on the full genus and species of our European peoples, the reconstruction of the ecologies of our cultures and people, addresses problems of our own making and ranks, problems and antagonists in due course. The two world views that the right puts forth are Christianity and Hitler. Some may foolishly wish to ignore the Trojan horse that is Christianity. Most people cannot play with its obvious absurdity, do not like the games that charlatans play “to make sense of” and dupe us with those tarot cards; others readily see the Trojan horse for what it is, implications of its texts and what it leads to being all too obvious. Matt Parrott says that he has “given up on the generation 68ers,” but that appears to be just more of his bureaucratic straw-manning for the right – brushing aside competition with false attributions of people who might know better and not let people put one over on younger folks. Perhaps he has a wish to see everyone who opposes Hitler and Jesus as “sixty eighters” whereas the hip kids “get it.” “ We are generation Identitaire!” - it is not the fault of the Jews or the right-wing White elitists and plutocratic traitors, it is the fault of older White people - older than Matt, anyway. It appears to be just an attempt to push-aside competition for the position of spokesman who might maintain that position by blowing smoke up the ass of the young and naive with Jesus stuff or pander to women with Hitler shit. The well motivated idea is not to abandon “teaching” 68er’s, as his straw man suggests, but to allow the experience and abilities among those whom it may concern, though a bit older than Matt, to contribute to European interests where they might. And if they do not believe in Hitler and Jesus that does not mean that they need to be shamed, but rather that their experience has them honestly looking at these darlings of the right for their inadequacies and that they are prepared to forge a new, more authentic European way of life, unlike the young fogies made incredibly self righteous by the mixed fortune of growing up with the Internet. Andrew Anglin says his eyes watered when he saw the clip of Nazi girls doing exercises in unison, he gushes over the rallies for Hitler, expresses admiration for the assimilation of the lock-step eusocial behavior of animal species such as birds, ants and bees. I find this sort of thing and the rallies, a whole nation beholden to one ranting inter-European war-monger, Hitler, repugnant; and I do not think that I am alone of any generation. Nor am I a baby boomer or a generation 68er, but an Xer – I will cop to that; I recognize a great deal of selfish destruction among the baby boomers (like a swarm of locusts); more, that the world war 2 generation were bamboozled by the context of the war into accepting radically anti-White changes, much commenced in The 1950’s. But to blame hippies, i.e. White men, is a convenient diversion for the Right to pander to feminist bitches and take the Jewish and corporate deflect at once. No, I will not accept blame for things that happened before I was born or when I was a small child. I will not see myself as a failure because my attempts to do something about it were not facilitated by the Internet. As I have mentioned previously, I can tell you from that perspective that the Internet provides huge advantages. Life is so much easier, everything from word processing to information acquisition, confirmation and comraderie is possible in a way that was impossible before. There is not much good to be said for years of isolation. However, it did not allow one to easily bypass lived experience and plug into what is mistakenly, sometimes badly mistakenly, presented as a fully considered system such as Hitler’s. One was forced to live through and see plainly the fact of its philosophical failures (along with the failures of liberalism). As it stands and amidst the vast destruction of European peoples, the right reacts with renewed conviction in “the tried and true” - really, the tried and failed - Jesus and Hitler, rather than a genuine holistic concern for our peoples, which these views certainly are not. It pretends that we must put all aside in order to focus on the Jew. By ignoring our concern as a people with a complete, authentic set of concerns, they can engraft HItler worship as a pseudo-justification, as the Jew is presented as an all encompassing concern. Thus, taking comfort for their disastrous war plan as put forth by their savior, Hitler; failing that, they might fall back on Jesus as savior, rather than a concern for our people. If sheer faith in Jesus or natural competition resulted in appropriate genetic pairings and justice then what is happening with miscegenation would not happen. The attitude of “just let it happen, the defective will be weeded out”, is very poorly considered. Seeing that our people are not the true concern and that White men are not able to hold up to Jews and blacks because they are not organized by these “leading voices”, by anything other than Jesus and Hitler, females will allow for the Jesus guys to beguile people from their hypergamy; and allow for the Hitler guys to prevent the ethnocentric from coming up with a better solution, better cultural guidelines to supersede the horrific injustice and destruction as a result of stupor and exploitation; they will revert to scientism, “nature’s competition, the way it is”, so say our god, Adolf. One of their hopes is to add females to the ranks by pandering to their most puerile inclination to incite competition. “Blacks are ok, they were no problem before the Jews manipulated them.” Talk about weak White men. And how does that hold up to EGI? Do we really need them so badly that we can ennoble them and their White women because they might think they are wise to the J.Q.? Will not people, our own included, respect us more if we do not pretend that we care so much about them, as much as ourselves, even to where their fucking us, literally, is no problem? Hitler was great, he targeted millions of Slavics for elimination – pretty White women and all. Get rid of that competition. Seems to be a pattern among the right. Again, some take the tack that we should not worry about these White women going to blacks, they are genetically defective and being weeded-out. That is small consolation and when one views, even by happenstance, the White women that non-Whites are getting it finally becomes apparent that genetics cannot be all of the problem. There is something to be said for the men who will not try to rationalize it; and a wariness that should be applied to the kind who do rationalize it, as the ones with bad instincts for our people, who contributed to getting us into this mess in the first place. The idea that one who hates miscegenation is being distracted from the J.Q. is nonsense, as I have said all along, as it inexorably leads to the J.Q. through investigation of its various causes. President Sarkozy, in 2008, obligating the native French to interbreed with non-Whites While I used to be more curious about what sort of women would be least disposed to this, now I do see the culture and its rules as more fundamental an issue. As humans, we are born very incomplete, and it is incumbent upon those looking after the social rule-structures of our culture to assimilate the proper guidance of our behaviors, even to our own best interests. We could say, like Uncle Adolf, that it is all about competition and struggle at bottom, denying human agency and the corrective guidance of culturally mediating rules, parenting, stewarding and cooperation between European groups. We can allow his e1b1b and all is struggle at bottom perspective to work its wonders, pandering to those who would just as soon see Europeans kill one another for all it really cares about Europeans. But if we are to be true to ourselves, yes, we must be vigilant against Jews and the Israel Lobby as they operate against European interests from seven choke points and their genetic/cultural pattern; we must be vigilant against their liberal Marxist lackeys - Je ne suis pas Charlie. But neither are we Dieudonné. It is also undoubtedly a part of female nature to get-off on acquiescing to the victorious bully. We must be vigilant against the Right’s pandering - including pandering to the increased one-up position of females within he disorder of modernity, where they are more powerful gate-keepers than ever - with the rupture of social classificatory bounds through anti-racism their base propensity to incite genetic competition more arbitrary than ever, where there will be guys coming from every direction, looking to show how tough they are by pandering to females as to how “objective”, rational, above it and liberal that they are. But No. Je ne suis pas Dieudonné From Wikipedia
Comments:2
Posted by arcidus on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:33 | #
When I see comments like this come straight from the top, it’s hard to really care any more about what’s going on with blacks, mudsharks, the French Republique or much else. I’ll try and maintain the idea of European civilization in my mind and hope one day it arises again from the dust. If it takes 500 years, then fine—that’s about what it took last time there was a crash this bad. 3
Posted by E.G.I. on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:49 | # When I see comments like this come straight from the top, it’s hard to really care any more about what’s going on with blacks, mudsharks, the French Republique or much else. I’ll try and maintain the idea of European civilization in my mind and hope one day it arises again from the dust. If it takes 500 years, then fine—that’s about what it took last time there was a crash this bad.When I see comments like this come straight from the top, it’s hard to really care any more about what’s going on with blacks, mudsharks, the French Republique or much else. Arcidus, I appreciat4e the incisiveness of your focus but a mudshark is the destruction of 41,000 years of evolution personified. Regarding blacks, bear in mind Salter’s calculation of E.G.I. That’s no joke either. When you consider that much evolution and the destructive impact on E.G.I it might be more calculable as to how it is devastating of someone else’s everything - that you disregard as entirely insignificant. I never said that the removal of Jews, particularly from power points, ought not to be a priority - it should, that would be the real re-revolution. And I think coming up with a number, such as 100,000 is a good idea as it provides a concrete, measurable goal. The French Republique is something else: abstract principles of a proposition nation, not something concrete, I can appreciate not caring about that. 4
Posted by Cartesian Speech on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:59 | # Good one from KM:
I suspect that many of the dilemmas of free speech stem from the naive or disingenuous implementation of the abstract (Cartesian) rules of a proposition nation. If a nation were based on the biological interests of a group then what is free speech and what is prohibited would be more easily, consistently and fairly adjudged. 5
Posted by KM on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06 | #
DanielS I suspect that many of the dilemmas of free speech stem from the naive or disingenuous implementation of the abstract (Cartesian) rules of a proposition nation. If a nation were based on the biological interests of a group then what is free speech and what is prohibited would be more easily, consistently and fairly adjudged. 6
Posted by Golden Dawn babes on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:43 | # Speaking of feminine inspiration, missed this one - The Golden Dawn has some fine babes in their ranks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqm—YrFE4M#t=77
7
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:10 | # Jez Turner speaks without illusions as to the powers-that-be and how they can be overcome: 8
Posted by fighting motivation on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 05:30 | # Since it seems that motivating our people to fight as a group, in their group interests, is problematic, we might refer to Prof. Hew Strachan’s thoughts on the matter. He observes that some motivations of fighters are not recognized because they are out of fashion and not cool to tell the public. Humanitarian concern - higher national ideals - booty. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82chEH9gZvc
Higher national ideals can be and have been traditionally a reason why people fight - they still are, but it is not so cool to say nowadays. Booty is even more stigmatic nowadays to cite as your motivation. Yet Strachan observes that this has been the primary reason for most fighting though the ages. Strahan notes further that wars are more often than not a liability than a profit nowadays - hence, no profit to be shared.
The question becomes the formulation, the proportion and content: Material reward (as opposed to the word “booty”, which sounds too much of early seventies pop negro music), humanitarianism and nationalist ideals. 9
Posted by anon on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:38 | #
And blackmail.
The zealots think keeping Jews distinct is necessary to prevent assimilation so it was the Euro drift towards universalism, which included making Jews equal citizens with the the same rights and the same duties, that led to the decision to try and bring about White genocide in the same way the Maccabean zealots massacred the Greeks and Hellenized Jews in Jerusalem (which is what Hanukkah relates to). They need anti-semitism to stay cohesive so when non-Jews aren’t anti-semitic enough they plot to kill them.
10
Posted by anon on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:41 | # http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_during_the_Second_Temple_Period#Hellenistic_Period 11
Posted by anon on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:25 | # Apols for three posts in a row.
To be strictly accurate emancipation led to two solutions: White genocide or zionism. so the JQ has three-four parts 1) banking mafia - this is actually more of an organized crime problem imo 2) zealots - acting to maintain Jewish cohesion by any means necessary divided into three groups 3) the rest - mostly driven by 3000 years of evolved paranoia 12
Posted by Dieudonné twit on Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:38 | # “French comedian Dieudonné has been arrested for being an “apologist for terrorism” after he left a post on Facebook apparently sympathizing with one of the gunmen from the Paris terror attacks last week. Prosecutors had opened the case against him on Monday after he posted “Tonight, as far as I’m concerned, I feel like Charlie Coulibaly”—mixing the popular slogan “Je Suis Charlie” used in homage to the journalists killed at magazine Charlie Hebdo, with a reference to gunman Amedy Coulibaly. Coulibaly killed four Jews at a Jewish supermarket on Friday and a policewoman the day before. The comedian made international headlines in 2013 when French footballer Nicolas Anelka was banned for five matches by English football authorities for using a hand-gesture created by Dieudonné that many people consider anti-Semitic. Dieudonné made his controversial Facebook post after attending Sunday’s unity march against extremism that brought more than 1.5 million people onto the streets of Paris in the wake of the attacks. He described the march—considered the biggest rally in modern French history—as “a magical moment comparable to the Big Bang”. The government has in the past banned Dieudonné‘s shows because it considers them “anti-Semitic”. In response to the interior minister’s comment, the comedian said the government was trying to “ruin my life” when he was “only trying to make people laugh”. He has removed the offending remark from his Facebook page. To limit the overwhelming burden on our moderators, it will not be possible to comment on this article. Feel free to join the conversation on our Facebook page. Don’t miss stories about France, join us on Facebook and Twitter AFP (.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)) 13
Posted by jamesUK on Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:39 | # That’s Dieudonné girlfriend to the right of him in the 1st picture? She hot! Well done sir! 14
Posted by ScrewTroll on Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:52 | # Fuck you JamesUK. I’ve long recognized you as the troll that you are (Voznich too). 16
Posted by Primitivism on Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:34 | # “Rather than being fulfilling, primitivism is emptying” - Kenneth Burke
Mind you, I am not saying that we should take mudsharks back, and forgive them. But that we should recognize that we must take more part in culturally conditioning our people to not do this in the first place. 18
Posted by Je ne suis pas Jimi Henry on Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:33 | # ...wound up killing herself with car fumes.. 19
Posted by je ne suis pas jimi henry on Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:39 | # 20
Posted by Je ne Suis Pas Jimi Henri on Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:58 | # Tobias Langdon writes:
Call me unforgiving, but personally, I was disabused of holding Bridget Bardot on a pedestal when I read a credible account of her having had a fling with Jimi Hendrix. It was said that when returning from a vacation in Morocco, Jim Hendrix ran into Bridget Bardot on a stop-over at a French airport. She took him home for a romp for some days. That would place her among scores of White women, erstwhile faithful wives of deserving men, that Hendrix behaved entitle to indulge-in. It culminated with German figure skater Monika Dannemann thinking she would get Hendrix to marry her… perhaps an extra dose of sleeping pills and red wine would tame him. It did, for good: he puked his anxiety into a permanent calm:
“Purple vomit, up and down Purple vomit, all around Purple vomit in my lungs, Excuse me While I wheeze and die”..
21
Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:39 | # @ScrewTroll Chill out dude just stating a fact. Is your girlfriend/wife as hot as Dieudonnés? I will not chill out shit-head. You came to a human site and congratulated a monkey for taking a human wife and arrogating 41,000 years of evolution to himself. I create women like that in co-evolution, Deudones creates monkey women that not even he wants. If there are no men like me then there are no women like that. Now fuck off. 22
Posted by Confessions of a Blackman on Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:22 | # Your white women like us blacks. They think we are good in bed. My wife is a nurse in the UK. Each time I visit white women are always throwing themselves at me. I am not the most handsome but this is real. They bump into me intentionally, smile and start chatting me up like prostitutes in a bar. I avoid temptation since I am a public figure back home but your women are very loose. Your culture also promotes loose morals. My kids go to school in the UK and I worry about the pornography on tv and shops plus Internet. Don’t blame us it is your loose women. They have unnatural sexual desires. A black friend living in the UK is so fed with white women who cheat that he has divorced many times and opted for a decent African woman from back home. Here where I live in Africa we have white women who come as charity workers and end up sleeping with young boys. One woman even took her boyfriend back to Norway. We hear stories of white girls and women who sleep with dogs. Tame your women. 23
Posted by Aesthetics bridle functional runaway on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:11 | # This article is a bit hard on the fairer sex, but if there is to be a check on the power of their position within the disorder of modernity’s and Jewish prohibition of classificatory bounds, then a critical perspective is necessary to offset pandering from all angles. Buffalo Jenkins argues for masculine concern for aesthetics as a bridling of systemics from functional runaway.
by Buffalo Jenkins
.... bearing attention is the boldened remark: we all must admit as a group they are credulously prone to liberalism.
24
Posted by Thunder on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:52 | # I am a proud white man. I am normal. I take pride in the achievements of my people and prefer to associate with my own kind. I love white women who love white men. I detest white women who do not. I have no respect for white women who couple with non whites. I am a normal, proud, white man. 25
Posted by Culture Becomes Cognitive on Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:27 | # Effortful Control, Explicit Processing, and the Regulation of Human Evolved Predispositions Kevin B. MacDonald California State University–Long Beach
26
Posted by Mulatto Supremacist Upshot on Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:08 | # Mulatto Supremacist Upshot - a result of pandering to females and the proclivity of their puerile members uncritiqued
27
Posted by HBD on Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:56 | # Caitlin Rules https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260#t=177 28
Posted by end of black power on Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:04 | # On today’s Stormfront Radio Don Black and Roy try to announce “the end of black power.” ...while Roy continues to plug The Daily Stormer (how stupid)..and David Duke follows right along on the same show with Black and Roy, who says: “Nobody feels sorry for blacks anymore” “black power was always dependent upon White power.” Of course there is truth to their being dependent upon White and Jewish power. However, that is not the complete story. When you take a people who are evolved some 250,000 years prior to Europeans, there are going to be aspects to bio-power to their advantage; this is reflected in their population growth, in the amount of tribute paid to them in order to buy-off their violent proclivities and in their appeal to a certain percentage of White females. If they had no power of themselves what-so-ever, they would have no appeal to females, let alone some of the ones that they are getting. Roy and Black go on to take the right wing angle of appealing to sympathy for them as the Mexicans are cleansing them from their neighborhoods. Why is that a concern? Who cares? White women? Right wingers are always saying blacks are no problem. My experience tells me that is not good advice and not good equipment for Whites - let alone to be complacent with that kind of hubris. Then they want people to sympathize with blacks, because “they will suffer from immigration as well.” White/Europeans are the people that we are supposed to care about, so why should we care if Mexicans push blacks out? I couldn’t care less, in fact, am fully inclined to route for the Mexicans of the two. Neither of these groups are our people and when I look discriminatingly upon blacks it is normally because they are a salient example of the other, so obviously other that they are taken for granted by some (usually right-wingers) as non-threatening as they are comparing abilities of criteria where blacks do not represent an enormous threat (if staying within that criteria). These right wingers (perhaps wanting Hitler’s perspective to seem more relevant than it is), will try to say that they are so beyond that, missing the point that our hermeneutic process looks to our own interests most often and moves to attend to problems on interface with all non-Europeans, whether Mexican, Muslim, Jews, Asians, etc. and yes, even blacks, even though their right wing girlfriends may not want anybody focusing attention on their destructive properties - which, in terms of EGI, is among the worst of all.
29
Posted by Draw the prophet muhammad on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:33 | # Paul Weston interviews “Draw the prophet Muhammad” organizer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8zKu5eG03o
Post a comment:
Next entry: Motivation to Fight: Humanitarian - Higher National Ideals - Booty
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) Commentsweremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:34. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:42. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:27. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:49. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:37. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:24. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:16. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:43. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:42. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:38. (View) |
Posted by Jewi$h PACs on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:50 | #
Keith Alexander, Political Cesspool, January 10, 2015
http://lnrlive.com/tpc/tpc20150110a.mp3