Paul Weston arrested for reciting Churchill speech about Muslims
Paul Weston has been arrested for reciting a speech by Churchill, the one about Muslims. Weston on preventing White genocide and implications of Muslim population explosion in Britain and other European nations:
Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:13 | # I second that, Thorn. Paul is a very thoughtful guy, and I don’t doubt that he thought through the Winchester action carefully. However, the question is: on what grounds was he arrested? If for breach of the peace, he would have to be saying something that might cause a riot. Unlikely on a quiet morning in well-to-do Winchester. If for hate speech in some form, he’s free and clear without any doubt if he was only reading from Churchill’s text. Unlawful assembly is out because it doesn’t apply, I think. That leaves local by-laws, since Paul was standing on council-owned property. But, ordinarily, the police would not arrest someone making a political protest on council property. So it’s all a bit odd. 3
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:22 | # Morgoth, welcome to the site. I have admired your work in the thread wars for a long time. I am very pleased Daniel has opened the doors to you. 4
Posted by Morgoth on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:06 | # Thanks GW, and Daniel for making this a main post. Whether or not it is related I can’t say but Paul’s Party recently tried to update their manifesto moving into the upcoming Euro elections, the Electoral Commission rejected the Party’s manifesto. Unfortunately I can’t find the rejection letter but George Whale has published the reply sent back to the Electoral Commission here: The idea that a Party can have it’s policies rejected on the grounds that they are ‘‘offensive’’ has deeper implications for the growing number of dissident parties. The article on Paul’s arrest has already gained 10x the amount of comments, and presumably reads, than other articles on his Party’s site so once again we see the death spiral of Liberalism in action, this time it’s a real peach, an Englishman arrested for quoting Churchill (!) The system creates dissidents, the system clamps down on the dissidents and thereby creates far more dissidents. I posted this on the main DT comment piece: ‘’ Yesterday Paul Weston who is a regular commentor here was arrested for reciting a speech by Winston Churchill. This is the ‘‘Tolerant’’ Britain we now have, a country where repeating a speech by the man who was voted ‘‘The Greatest Briton of all time’’ will get you arrested. It gained 75 ‘‘recommends’’ within 30 minutes and was then removed and the entire board shut down, needless to say it doesn’t even come close to an infringement of ‘‘house rules’‘. The system is starting to appear brittle, like cold toffee. 6
Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 04:06 | # I’ve long liked this Paul Weston. I’m starting to really admire him now. Farage is OK, but nothing more. Weston seems like the real deal. Wouldn’t it be nice if we had an Occidentalist in the White House, one who would immediately recall America’s ambassador to the UK until such time as all such phony charges against Weston were dropped? Meanwhile, how can Americans and others help Mr. Weston? 7
Posted by Mick Lately on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:09 | # lol I knew this was a DanielS entry from the huge photographs! But a massive (bigger than a DanielS photograph), planet-sized lolno @ this arrest of Paul Weston. This is an unwarranted action against Good Mr. Weston’s called-for whine! IIRC Guessedworker once credited the EDL with “visible resistance”. Well, this visible, and audible, show of resistance from Paul Weston lay somewhere between the faggotry of “raising awareness” and the thuggery of “direct action”. Should prick the conscience of even the most hardened Islamophile. Or perhaps not. Good work all round as I hadn’t come across this story before I saw this thread this morning. 8
Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:06 | # Most nationalists carp and do nothing but bemoan their sad fate. Weston, like Griffin, is actually getting off his ass and doing something for the cause. Good for him! 9
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:16 | # The quoted Churchill speech regarding Muslims.
- Winston Churchill 11
Posted by Morgoth on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:20 | # The latest on Paul Weston’s run in with the law including a post arrest interview. Amazingly the police chief told Paul off the record that England is already in an ‘‘unofficial war’‘. 12
Posted by Morgoth on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:09 | # The MSM has picked up the story: http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-04-28/euro-elections-candidate-arrested-over-hate-speech/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-27186573 http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/04/28/UK-Cops-Arrest-Man-for-Quoting-Churchill 13
Posted by Mick Lately on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:55 | # Good. The more people that read about this in the MSM the better. The Churchill quote might get them thinking something along the lines of: and; *Did Britain fight the Second World War for this?* 14
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:30 | # Interesting interview. Paul deliberately forgot to mention to the investigating officer that he was quoting verbatim from Winston Churchill’s writings. He was seeking to provoke an arrest, and to prove that the legal system, corrupted by pee-cee and anti-racism as it is, would blunder into action against the words and meanings of perhaps the greatest hero of the British people. So this was a challenge to the legal system. If the system doesn’t like it and tries to take him to trial, he will be able to elect to go before a jury at, presumably, Winchester Crown Court. There is no way that the Crown Prosecution Service could risk that. The legal officers involved in doing so would be exposing themselves to some very heavy political fire when the jury finds for Paul - which it certainly would. Either way, the nett effect is that Paul will be free to repeat the Churchill quote as much as he wants. The hands of the system will have been tied a little, and all power to him for that. 15
Posted by Trainspotter on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:39 | # Guessedworker: “He was seeking to provoke an arrest, and to prove that the legal system, corrupted by pee-cee and anti-racism as it is, would blunder into action against the words and meanings of perhaps the greatest hero of the British people.” Quite clever, if that’s the case. Hat’s off to Paul Weston. I’m only familiar with him through a couple of speeches that I’ve seen on video, but I was impressed. 16
Posted by uKn_Leo on Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:11 | # Paul Weston came here remember - he shows up @ post 49: http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_allure_or_the_danger_of_political_realism
17
Posted by wobbly on Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:00 | #
If correct that’s big - not that it’s true, it’s been true for years but that a senior po-leece would say it. 18
Posted by Jon on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:22 | # That excerpt from Churchill is one big non causa pro causa fallacy. It’s not unlike blaming “cannabilism” for why Bassongos act like Bassongos. As if if Muslims would only convert to atheism or Christianity, all untoward customs and behaviour would disappear. 19
Posted by Leon Haller on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:51 | # If a Churchillian criticism of Islam is not to be permitted to be voiced in officially Christian England, that is a big deal. I don’t know what it will taken to awaken Europeans. I find Europe’s “racial” problems utterly baffling - I mean, the fact that Europeans in their own homelands tolerate crap from nonwhites. America is a completely different situation in every sense, beginning with the presence “on the ground” of nonwhites, which antedated the Founding. One can understand, if not exonerate, white race liberals in the US. However poorly behaved our blacks might be, they do have an ‘excuse’ for being here, which in turn renders the white liberal desire for “racial justice” at least intelligible. But how can Europeans tolerate nonwhites wrecking their countries, when there is no excuse for a nonwhite presence in Europe? There ought to be 90+% support for terminating immigration, and at least majority support for reclamation-via-repatriation. Which simply takes us back to the grim empirical diagnosis that there is something racially aberrant about the white race, considered collectively ... 20
Posted by DanielS on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:23 | # Leon, I take your unremitting contention that the White race is defectively passive to be useless and tantamount to a Jewish trick - first time I saw that argument was from stinking Ilana Mercer. 21
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:46 | # Bill Warner on the Arrest of Paul Weston Dr. Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam discusses the recent arrest of Paul Weston for quoting Winston Churchill. He suggests how Counterjihad-minded people can use Mr. Weston’s example to be more effective in their efforts. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video: http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/04/bill-warner-on-the-arrest-of-paul-weston/ (Thorn note: The report of Paul Weston’s arrest is being widely reported in the KWA. From the Rush Limbaugh to Michael Savage to the Fox News Channel —The Five.... That’s a good thing but the problem is, they’re all framing the event within the context of free speech violations. For reasons all too obvious to race-realists, those in the MSM will not venture into the central issue that Paul Weston stresses: the ongoing race-replacement of England’s native population via massive immigration. As expected, the news blackout WRT white genocide continues.)
22
Posted by Trainspotter on Thu, 01 May 2014 00:16 | # Thorn: “As expected, the news blackout WRT white genocide continues.” Yes, which is why it is important to make the link ourselves, wherever we may post comments. Paul Weston, opponent of white genocide, was arrested for exercising his free speech rights. 23
Posted by Trainspotter on Thu, 01 May 2014 00:39 | # Leon Haller: “But how can Europeans tolerate nonwhites wrecking their countries, when there is no excuse for a nonwhite presence in Europe?” Leon, I used to think this way too. I remember first learning about non-white immigration to Europe when I was a kid back in the 80s. I distinctly recall thinking, “Are they crazy?” Why would they inflict this misery and stupidity upon themselves? I understood immediately that America had created its own racial problems, and we therefore had to deal with it, but it simply made no sense whatsoever that Europe would do this to itself. Now, of course, I understand that we whites are being subjected to a racial attack at an international scale, and therefore the struggle for our people is inherently an international one. What I didn’t understand at that time, but do now, is that the anti-white liberal (by this I mean the garden variety types, not those that are at the top and orchestrating all of this) is not a rational being. Certainly, he is far more akin to a cultist than a rational man. What he believes doesn’t need to make sense. He is fundamentally hostile to the continuity of the European peoples, and if he lacks a good reason to justify this, he’ll just make one up. Any ludicrous reason will do, or none at all. Arguing with them reveals this bizarre nature. Not too long ago, Jesse Jackson visited Sweden, unless my memory fails me. He told a group of liberal Swedes that Sweden must become a multiracial society, and the justification for this seemed to be that some Swedish ships were supposedly involved in the slave trade. Even if true, even if a handful of Swedish sailors and merchants were involved, by what utter madness does one conclude that an entire people must be swamped with Africans? That an entire people must become Africanized hybrids? It’s beyond mad hatter insanity, but the Swedish liberals ate it up. They grinned and applauded the good reverend. Really sickening stuff, but also bizarre. Again, madness. It’s so insane, so grotesquely evil, that it baffles the mind that any sentient creature could believe such a thing. But the anti-whites do so believe. None of it has to make the least bit of sense, which is why Americans who think that they have to argue over Indians or slavery are missing the point. The anti-white cultist doesn’t actually care about any of that stuff, any more than the anti-whites in Europe do. The are immune to reason and evidence, they are cultists, and we must separate from them entirely. 24
Posted by Robert Reis on Thu, 01 May 2014 14:21 | # Maimonides ruled that where it is politic to do so and the Jews will not get the blame, then Christians are to be killed whenever possible. 25
Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 01 May 2014 23:17 | # Typical leftist/PC propaganda from liberal rag The Week, but at least the author (a sodomite, I think), succinctly explains why America has been ruined:
http://theweek.com/article/index/260817/theres-no-such-thing-as-an-illegal-immigrant Immigration of nonwhites is THE white enemy. Never forget that. Never let the confused (or the mendacious) try to channel justified rage over white dispossession and oppression into the useless or secondary channels of antisemitism, anti-capitalism, anti-Americanism, anti-Christianity, etc. The issue is RACE RACE RACE RACE RACE RACE RACE!! When WN confuses its mission with other concerns apart from condemning the disaster of totalitarian racial integration, it merely retards the growth of white consciousness and patriotism. Any self-styled “WN” who is not first and foremost a racialist (and therefore anti-immigrationist) is no WN at all. 26
Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 01 May 2014 23:26 | # Train@23 My lifelong thoughts, precisely. “Diversity” is truly a new religion. Hence, my long term desire to write a book (post-doctorate) on The Cult of Diversity, exploring diversity in light of Religious Studies analyses of classic cults, and then comparing diversitarianism with what I understand to be the true creed of Christianity. But for political purposes, consider my comments on White Zion, and its justification. I will be proven correct re WZ. Our people, to live, require TOTAL SEPARATION, not only from nonwhites (including Jews), but from white liberals, too. We will never achieve this within the historic state system. We are ideological minorities everywhere, and always will be. Even if a majority of whites achieve race consciousness, our votes will be swamped by white liberals + burgeoning immigrant communities (cf. white American conservatives - a clear majority of whites - and national power). Only by international ingathering do we have a chance. 27
Posted by Robert Reis on Fri, 02 May 2014 05:43 | # Feminism is one long, impassioned plea to restructure society so smart women with repellent personalities can find comfortable sinecures that don’t require attracting a husband.http://anti-gnostic.blogspot.com/ 28
Posted by Robert Reis on Fri, 02 May 2014 05:51 | # If I fuck your daughter and your wife in front of you – and all you do is gripe online about it – you have given me no reason to fear you 29
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 02 May 2014 15:11 | # David Hamilton article discussing Churchill’s White patriotism, obscured in recent WN discourse, wherein “Churchill” has become synonymous to cooperation with Jewish war-mongering banksters and Dresden http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2014/05/winston-white-nationalist.html
30
Posted by Mick Lately on Fri, 02 May 2014 15:31 | # So after his Jew-Jew pays better than you-you phase Churchill attempted to turn the tide post Windrush? That’s to his credit but it seems that the NWOish plans might already have been in place after the Jews emerged as the real winners of the Second World War. Difficult to know: I admire the sober-minded approach that Dan Dare took on the immigration series here but it does seem as if there may have been a secret plan to rid the world of whites that was put in to place ~1948. 31
Posted by wobbly on Fri, 02 May 2014 21:20 | # @Trainspotter
You’re right that sense and logic aren’t relevant. However what is critical to them is that they believe themselves to be moral. That’s their weak spot. 32
Posted by Nick Dean on Fri, 02 May 2014 22:46 | # Yay! Go Churchill and Ukay neocons! If that doesn’t make nationalism more appealing, next stop Afriyie and Sacha Baron-Cohen! 33
Posted by Robert in Arabia on Sat, 03 May 2014 02:24 | # http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhxqIITtTtU Ape With AK-47 34
Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 10 May 2014 10:41 | # WHO IS DAVID CAMERON?!
35
Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 10 May 2014 10:42 | # cntd.
36
Posted by Leon Haller on Wed, 14 May 2014 08:34 | # Calling any intellectual Englishmen (or Welshmen, Scotsmen, Ulstermen et al): I recently got a magazine solicitation for the London Review of Books. I’m a long time subscriber to the New York Review of Books. I’ve gotten these before. This one is $30 for 1 year (24 issues). Seems pretty cheap to me. Question: Is the LRB of a high intellectual quality (as they advertise)? I know they’re leftist (as with the NYRB), but are they good? I’ve read a number of their reviews online, but I still can’t tell. Often what I want to read is not available to non-subscribers. 37
Posted by Bill on Wed, 14 May 2014 09:51 | # Telling it as it is 20 years too late. What did we gain by being on the defensive eh? Sweet FA. Nick Griffin: Holocaust ‘exploited’ to stifle immigration debate http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/bnp/10829555/Nick-Griffin-Holocaust-is-a-moral-club.html 38
Posted by Bill on Wed, 14 May 2014 10:18 | # @37 The BBC version of events. Looks like we ain’t seen nutt’n yet. UKIP immigration policy based on race - BNP’s Nick Griffin UKIP is against “white immigration” from eastern Europe but in favour of “immigration from the Third World”, BNP leader Nick Griffin has claimed. 39
Posted by Bill on Wed, 14 May 2014 10:36 | # In both the Telegraph and BBC’s accompanying pictures of Nick Griffin is a far cry from the usual pictorial efforts when depicting the BNP leader. The standard fare for years has been to use the most hideous portrayal of Nick Griffin when accompanying BNP articles, but here the photos are of a different Nick Griffin, a serious Nick Griffin, a responsible thoughtful Mr Griffin, and dare I say, a budding grandee Mr Griffin. What’s going on here? 40
Posted by Bill on Thu, 15 May 2014 07:52 | # Having just skim read an article at Alt Right I immediately formed a question in my mind. The Article is IS ETHNIC REPLACEMENT ‘UNDEMOCRATIC’? http://alternative-right.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/is-ethnic-displacement-undemocratic.html#more I can’t get my head around the basic tenet this question calls for - we were never asked - the article says. What sane assasin would ask its victim if it wanted its throat cut. Is it me? However that was just an aside issue. Here’s my intended question. Is Darwinian fitness now redundant in a world of atomised humans? 41
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 15 May 2014 08:35 | # Is Darwinian fitness now redundant in a world of atomised humans? Well, Bill, the answer to your question is that environmental pressure never goes away. But in response to it European Man invented technology which super-charged his survival. East Asians even managed to survive, if not prosper exactly, in permanent ice-worlds. Now, the European technology is being free-ridden by peoples who do not possess the same creativity. Some may be able to maintain an existence with it. But it’s worth asking if Africans, left to themselves, could possibly survive in a cold-climate region. 42
Posted by Bill on Thu, 15 May 2014 11:31 | # GW @ 41 Let me try and set up my ducks in a row. Darwin talks about species and sub species within the group (eg. birds) which hive off into sub species for whatever reason. Man exists only in the one human form and doesn’t evolve into sub species, but does evolve into culture, race? or even nation states. Liberal man has engineered the human specie into an atomised social condition, I cannot think of (off the top of my head) of any other such living creature that exists in this condition) Cue, list of avalanche of such species. Commutarianism is much spoken of as the ideal model for society these days, which as I understand it is humans living in harmonious social enclaves all contributing to the greater good. Which incidentally sounds very much like what I lived through in the 1950’s. Funny that, Blue labour yearning for a return to the 1950’s. Hilarious! This is at odds with the liberal/neoliberal? notion of an atomised society, which seems to throw up just one more inconsistency in the madhouse. Anyhow I digress, back to Darwin. An atomised human society surely cannot gravitate and coalesce into a competing Darwinian group for world hegemony, it can only decline into reverse and be overtaken and consigned to oblivion. I remember years ago commenting that liberalism is a culture of suicide, an ideal world without humans. GW. Are you saying that European man, and East Asian man, are evolved sub- species in our present day world? Sounds like you’re conflating sub species with race, or are they the same thing?
43
Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 15 May 2014 11:39 | # We are doomed. I think too much is being made out of Race as an intellectual matter. The issue is simple, really. Most other groups are behaviorally and cognitively (and thus economically/professionally) inferior, and our leaders coercively integrating us with them is causing no end of problems for us, as well as leading ultimately and ineluctably to our biological extinction. We don’t want Diversity imposed on us. We want back our lands. The quality of white existence deteriorates in tandem with the increased presence of nonwhites. That is the crux of the matter. Forget all this idle Darwinian and/or philosophical speculation. Where does it get us to ‘complexify’ something fundamentally simple? The really tough and useful questions pertain to the political strategy for awakening our race-blind fellow whites, and then for saving our race.
44
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 May 2014 12:49 | # An atomized society is an ideal environment in which a pro-immigration/pro-growth economic model thrives. The question is: Did the ruling class intentionally create such an environment so as to allow the aggressive sociopaths to become oligarchs? or did that environment arbitrarily evolve in which the aggressive sociopaths took advantage and became, or are in the process of becoming, oligarchs? Either way, does anyone think the oligarchs are going to give up their wealth and power in exchange for such “trivial matters” as preventing the white race from going extinct? Enter political correctness and anti-racism. PC and AR were created and designed as a tool to keep the dissenters of the current economic model and multiculturalism in line. In addition to the MSM, there are legions of PC police and PC police wannabes more than eager to work towards making sure PC and AR prevail. Can Paul Weston or Nigel Farage continue to exist (literally) in such a stacked-deck environment? Will Nigel Farage’s success cause his demise? as in being assassinated? 45
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 May 2014 13:38 | #
46
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 15 May 2014 14:43 | # Leon, Go to this thread: ... an article on “UKIP’s racism” by a black journalist who works at the DT as a moderator (yes, I think we now know where the hyper-censorship on the site originates). Now scroll down maybe thirty comments to the longish conversation between a certain Habitat12 and joebooker. Note the endless contortions of the latter as he tries to maintain his prized status as someone critical of immigration but far too moral to do very much about it (beside deport Moslems, of course). This is what we are up against. Such people cannot process the idea that liberal “compassion” and “empathy” have to go out of the window if our people are to survive. They simply cannot make do without their faux-morality. 47
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 May 2014 15:17 | #
What we are up against are people whose thinking is overridden by emotion. They comprise the masses. OTOH we are driven by reason and logic. Facts and evidence matter to us. Facts and evidence matter not to liberal do-gooders. They don’t care how disastrous the outcome of their illogical endeavors; the only thing that matters to them is their good intensions. As it stands now, we are vastly outnumbered. 48
Posted by DanielS on Thu, 15 May 2014 15:47 | # There’s the Ilana Mercer, “White psychology’s suicidal tendency”, meme again. Not that Christianity disrupts logical thinking and assertive concern for self interest in this life or anything. 49
Posted by Bill on Thu, 15 May 2014 16:11 | # @46 & 47
Jonathan Bowden says nationalism has to step over such matters, smash through it and onwards. I think he (Bowden) intimated if nationalism couldn’t hack it (carry it out) then it was curtains. If it comes to blows, people will, in the end, do whatever it takes. I think he’s right. It needs someone like Farage to pave the way, like Paul Weston in his video, call their bluff, I’m a racist so what! next question please? Make them look stupid. I made a comment @ 39 where BNP’s nick Griffin appears to be being wooed by the BBC, almost as if he is being groomed for rehabilitation, why would Nick Griffin diss Farage and UKIP to curry favour with the BBC? Looks like Griffin will do anything to gain airtime on the BBC. The BBC will obviously push the envelope to stir up discord within the nationalists ranks. There’s a goodly few PHD’s in the dirty tricks department at the BBC, I’m beginning to think they wrote the manual. I’m resolved not to follow this EU election blow by blow, on the media, I don’t know why other than I cannot stomach the ease with which the media lie and fool the people. 50
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 15 May 2014 18:29 | # As usual with the DT, anti-white racist censorship has kicked in. Everything has been blitzed. This creature just can’t stand pro-white discourse. Damian Thompson must be informed! 51
Posted by Bill on Thu, 15 May 2014 19:53 | # Having followed GW’s Telegraph link @ 46 I was taken aback by the quality of the little I read, as I had to adjourn for tea. I commented recently the Telegraph threads were barely worth reading such was the paucity of serious comment, today I have not only scanned down the linked thread but also another fresh article off the assembly line by Peter Oborne…. British politics is broken - and only Nigel Farage is profiting There’s also a headline suggesting there be a party political summit debate in the Telegraph for a Cameron-Clegg- Miliband debate in the run up to the 2015 General Election. Party leaders urged to take part in historic online debate The political class are in meltdown panic at the unfathomable runaway success Farage and his party are exhibiting, it is palpable, the whole of the media circus has swung into ‘Get Farage’ mode, including no other than one Nick Griffin of the BNP. Is this hate Farage genuine or is it carefully choreographed tag team wrestling? It’s a pretty convincing show of being frit, and so it should be because there is something definitely in wind for the media’s mood of complacency is losing its mojo. It is almost as though there is at long last a collective awakening throughout the land, especially to those in the media who see their unchallenged supremacy coming to an abrupt end. The eyes of the western world is upon Europe and the EU elections, searching for clues as to where next, quickly to be followed in 2015 as to what effect the EU election has had on British politics. The political landscape will look very different at the end of 2014 to what it was at the beginning, as to what it will look like at the end of 2015 is in the lap of the gods. I’ve been impatiently waiting all these years for the moment when our people raise from their television sets and cry to the heavens, ‘Oh my God what have we done’? I am having to pinch myself that this could actually be that moment. The acceleration of the changing mood is breath taking, even a few weeks ago there were no signs of such a breakthrough, the EU elections next week and the following 2015 British General Election are ordained by fate to be a referendum on Britain’s survival and the part that mass immigration will play. As Blair once uttered, the kaleidoscope has been shaken - the pieces are in flux. 52
Posted by Bill on Thu, 15 May 2014 20:05 | # 2nd link @ 51 should be… Party leaders urged to take part in historic online debate 53
Posted by wobbly on Thu, 15 May 2014 22:51 | #
They always do. They are driven to concentrate wealth - mostly out of evolved paranoia - but an economy can’t function if wealth is too concentrated so round and round it goes in a cycle.
54
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 May 2014 23:53 | #
No, they don’t always do. My point is this time it’s different. Their policy of massive immigration is leading to race-replacement. This time the “cycle” is leading to permanence. That’s the difference. 55
Posted by Desmond Jones on Fri, 16 May 2014 04:58 | # The ‘cycle’ is always permanent.
It makes no difference whether Irish or Pole, it’s still race replacement. 56
Posted by wobbly on Fri, 16 May 2014 04:59 | # Your original point.
My answer to that is they always (involuntarily) give up their wealth and power by destroying the basis of their wealth and power. They always cut the branch they’re sitting on. # Separate to that is whether or not in the process of losing their wealth and power this time - as they always do - they will have done enough damage to permanently destroy the host population. I agree that part is different this time. Although that’s now new historically either: you can follow their progress through history by following the chain of once impressive ex civilizations starting with Saba that became African admixed and stagnant.
57
Posted by Mick Lately on Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45 | # Time to fill the “low-information voter” with the “right” kind of information: Any thoughts? 58
Posted by wobbly on Fri, 16 May 2014 16:59 | #
They’re all estimates. No-one knows the true numbers. 59
Posted by Bill on Fri, 16 May 2014 20:06 | # Dan Hodges at the Telegraph. 16/5/2014
Nigel Farage was comprehensively taken to the cleaners in this interview, why doe he think taking on these people he’s going to get a fair shake of the dice. Farage should steer clear of leftist motor mouths like O’Brian, perhaps there’s a salutary lesson to be learned here. Hodges was right when he compares this interview with Nick griffin’s debacle on BBC’s News Night, but he is wrong however when he states Farage’s fate will be the same as Nick Griffins. There is something totally bizarre happening in this election, unprecedented I should think. No matter what insults and allegations, personal and financial misdoings, even accusations of the most heinous crime in the leftist book, fail to make any dent in Farage’s fortunes, on the contrary, Teflon Nigel sails sublimely on. Not only are the slings and arrows having no effect on UKIP’s fortunes but are having a totally opposite effect as they boomerang back to the accusers. The left are getting their own sh*t back. I’ve always thought the left have a blind spot and nowhere is it more apparent than in this current campaign, they are incapable of putting themselves in UKIP’s supporters shoes, it is incomprehensible to the left that such rhetoric will not paralyse UKIP like a cross being bared to a vampire. The idea that no-one could possibly not agree with them never enters their head. Jonathan Bowden would have loved this interview, it validates all he says about stepping over the guilt trap and smashing forward and onwards, leaving your gaping opponent in the rear view mirror. Farage should learn from this interview, he never got a word in about what he wanted to say, motor mouth threw so many punches Farage was reduced to shrivelling wreck. He can’t afford to be seen repeating this performance very often or he will be toast 60
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 17 May 2014 12:24 | # The struggle: Traditional conservatism vs “corporate conservatism.” If “corporate conservatism” prevails, white America is toast. I see little difference between what’s happening in the KWA to what’s taking place in the EU—especially England.
61
Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 17 May 2014 12:59 | # “Corporate conservatism” (aka “neoliberalism) is the “right” half of the elite which is parasitically enriching itself off America’s decline. A lot of these corporate guys are just as big race traitors as college professors. Let us memorialize who they are, if only for future purposes. I’ve long thought we ought to be doing a rightist analogue to leftist “shaming”. Why should some overpaid race traitor supporting the displacement of American workers not be subject to public censure? That said, I’ll take “corporate conservatism” over Obamunism any day. After all, most of us can find work (and life) in an expanding economy. But economic stagnation breeds total misery. Anyway, there is no hope for whites (at least outside of Old Europe) except White Zion. Even if enough white Americans awaken (and I see everything going in the opposite direction), what will we be able to do, now that our land has been colonized? Either internal secession, or White Zionist emigration. 63
Posted by Bill on Sun, 18 May 2014 09:17 | # Over this weekend I had chance to have a chat with a long time associate and one time colleague, not exactly a friend you might say, but know sufficiently well to have a comfortable discussion about how to put the world to rights. It was the hottest day so far this summer, Clive, (not his real name) was tending his manicured lawn stripped to the waist shorts and all. I pass his house as I take my Saturday afternoon cycle ride. Diversity is a million miles away as we look out over uninterrupted English countryside with its early verdant summer greens framed with clear blue sky as a staged backdrop. After much pleasantry I eventually ask Clive who will he be voting for in the EU elections this coming week, the reply was the usual angst face, contorted, as he wrestled with what to him was obviously a thorny question, from then on I probed his thinking. Clive is an old c/Conservative never voted otherwise. He is a pleasant, intelligent chap and in recent months we have had several such chats across the garden fence. At the end of of our amicable exchanges I’m never really certain he’s taken on board or understood anything I’ve said. Well, this conversation went the way of all others, and it was obvious he hadn’t taken on board or even understood what I was talking about, we parted company cheerily, I on my cycle and he knees bend tending his border. And as times before, I lazily set off across the easy riding valley lanes and hedgerows, my thoughts mulling my conversation with Clive, I tried to figure out what it was about Clive (and others I know and talk to, some to the left, others to the right, but all solid small ‘c’ British conservatives). I was puzzled as to the common thread that united them all in similar fashion, ostensibly agreeing with my sentiments but never convincingly. (Yes it could be me). I was never altogether convinced Clive and the others really took on board the points I was making, The only conclusion that made any sense in the way they reacted was all of them could not believe that their trusted representatives could or would behave in such a manner. The chaos, the corruption and treachery they were witnessing was (always) due to their politicians being totally useless. Clive and his like will continue to invest their (shrinking) confidence in a corrupt system, never thinking it could be any different. None that I’ve spoken to are capable of thinking outside of the box. I always ask if they have access to a computer and they all have, but when I ask if they ever use it to investigate the causes of Britain’s plight, its always the same response, a look of amazement. No they don’t. I wonder if they have any notion of cognisant dissonance? Hmm,? I might try it next time. 64
Posted by Bill on Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:44 | # Europe’s Camp of the Saints moment. Guardian 3/6/2014 Europe faces ‘colossal humanitarian catastrophe’ of refugees dying at sea. There’s more to this article than meets the eye. . 65
Posted by Bill on Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:16 | # @ 64 Should have included…. I hardly recognise the Guardian’s comment section, stuff that wouldn’t have seen the light of day not long back is now majority viewing. Unintended consequences or intended? I’ve read where the EU are gearing up plans to accept a further 50 million migrants from Africa. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/78180/50million-invited-to-Europe 66
Posted by Nation of Islam, group evolution strategy on Thu, 07 May 2015 08:11 | # The Nation of Islam as an African-American Group Evolutionary Strategy - Andrew Joyce, May 6, 2015
67
Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:07 | # Speaking of wedge issues, this is another wedge issue that is coming up just north of where Weston is, and which has been developing for a while now. There is the fact that the ‘gay rights’ issue has evolved to the stage where ‘gay rights’ are now associated with what they call ‘white privilege’, because Muslims don’t like gay people and so rubbing it in their faces is now considered to be a form of oppression directed against what they regard as a marginalised group.
Of course, it is difficult to understand how Muslims could be an oppressed or marginalised group, considering that they hold institutional power in a whole region of the world called ‘MENA’ (Middle East and North Africa), and have a large population of adherents as well as being one of the world’s largest and most overbearingly oppressive religions. A religion which asserts that all other gods are ‘false’, other than their own. The fact that there is a situation where the liberal establishment is defending that religion in European lands, shows how far the Overton Window has been dragged. 68
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:34 | # It’s a good idea to use this as a wedge issue. Queers are a very small part of our populations and clearly a practical place to make a concession (since their small presence is inevitable) when choosing a side to take in order to exploit a contradiction in liberalism and drive a wedge against Islam. We can freak-out the Mulims, cause significant consternation in the liberal world view and crucially, wedge against “conservatives” altogether as they are, as you say, conserving liberalism and universalism, e.g., through Christianity. 69
Posted by Bone chilling warning by Paul Weston on Fri, 09 Mar 2018 02:00 | # Bone chilling address of CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee of America) by Paul Weston, in which he warns America not to look toward Europe as the homeland that will always be there -
70
Posted by The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws on Sun, 03 Feb 2019 18:19 | #
71
Posted by Adrean on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 14:09 | #
72
Posted by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:11 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: MR Radio - Tom Metzger, Jimmy Marr, Daniel ... and me
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:43. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:42. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:38. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:23. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:55. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:26. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:58. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:49. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:00. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:22. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:35. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:33. (View) shoney commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:14. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:22. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 07:06. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:28. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:12. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:09. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:13. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:05. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:28. (View) |
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 16:44 | #
No doubt the liberal elites delight in arresting Paul Weston for the simple fact he is emerging as the most effective voice who’s publically fighting against the ongoing ethnocide being perpetrated against the native English in particular, and the white race in general.
I can only hope and pray the arrest of Mr. Weston serves to promote him and his/our cause rather than deter him. IOWs Paul Weston’s act of civil disobedience and subsequent arrest may very well backfire on the tyrannical ruling class. Given a few lucky breaks, it might catapult him and his message into the national spotlight and as a result, begin to turn the propaganda war in our favor ... for a change.