Sir Gerald Howarth stands by letter: Time for England to fight back

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, 31 August 2014 04:51.

                                    crest
Veteran Conservative MP has claimed that Enoch Powell was right to warn against immigration in his controversial ‘rivers of blood’ speech.

“It is time for England to ‘fight back’ against political correctness’ and he added:
‘If you don’t like it, go live somewhere else.’

howarth

Sir Gerald Howarth said that he stood by the letter and said his views had been reinforced by the child sex abuse scandal in Rotherham, where gangs of Asian men groomed and abused children.

‘For 40 years we have been subjected to a left wing political correctness which has stopped the British people from expressing perfectly legitimate and reasonable views. More than 1,400 children in Rochdale have paid the price for decades of political correctness, now people are speaking up.’

He said that it is time for England to ‘fight back’ against political correctness, adding:
‘If you don’t like it, go live somewhere else.’


Mr Powell delivered his ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech in Birmingham in April 1968, calling for the “repatriation” of non-white immigrants and claiming that the increased diversity would lead to riots…


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11060168/Tory-MP-claims-Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech-was-right.html

There is no suggestion that Sir Gerald advocated repatriation in his letter to a constituent.

Mr Powell was immediately sacked from the shadow cabinet after his comments by Edward Heath, the then Conservative leader.”



Comments:


1

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:59 | #

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/crock-of-shock-liberal-responses-to-vibrant-depravity/


Crock of Shock: Liberal Responses to Vibrant Depravity

August 30, 2014 — Tobias Langdon

Life has been disturbing for liberals lately. An American journalist is beheaded by a jihadi with a “British accent.” “Shocking,” says the Independent. At least 1400 White girls are subject to years of rape by men “of Pakistani heritage” in the Yorkshire town of Rotherham. “Shocking,” says the anti-racist campaigner Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.

Yes, it’s another of those occasions when I wonder whether English is really my mother-tongue. I thought “shocking” news had to contain some element of surprise and unpredictability. But that doesn’t seem to apply here. Britain has been enriched by mass immigration from violent and misogynistic Third World nations. Is it surprising when an enricher with a British accent cuts someone’s head off? Is it surprising when other enrichers commit gang-rape?

Not to me. I think it’s utterly predictable. Recall that smarmy liberal phrase: “of Pakistani heritage.” This is part of the heritage:

  In the first phase of the war, young men and Hindus, Awami League members, intellectuals, students and academics were targeted for murder. In the second phase of the war, women were singled out. It is thought that at least 200,000 women were raped by the Pakistani forces and their collaborators – 25,000 victims found themselves pregnant, so that is not implausible. There are eyewitness accounts of “rape camps” set up by the Pakistani forces. The numbers, and the names of rape victims, remain disputed. Sheikh Mujib, the first leader of Bangladesh, ordered the destruction of lists so that the shame would not follow the victims all their lives. … It is impossible to know the real death toll. The historian R.J. Rummel, who has looked as deeply into it as anyone, concludes that the “final estimate of Pakistan’s democide to be 300,000 to 3,000,000, or a prudent 1,500,000.” (The war Bangladesh can never forget, The Independent, 19th February 2013).

That was in 1971, when Bangladesh, then called East Pakistan, seceded from Pakistan: the two regions, separated by Hindu India, had become a single Muslim nation at the Partition of India in 1947. So that’s how Pakistani Muslims treat members of their own religion and race: mass murder, mass rape. How Muslims treat members of other religions was seen during Partition itself: mass murder, mass rape. Violence and misogyny are as inseparable from Islam as narcissism and mendacity are from liberalism.


Liberals are well aware of how Muslims have behaved in the Indian subcontinent. That quotation about the Bangladesh genocide is from the Independent. And liberals have just mourned the death of Richard Attenborough, whose Oscar-winning film Gandhi (1982) portrayed the violence of Indian Partition in vivid detail. Despite knowing all this, liberals permitted Muslims to immigrate into the UK in huge numbers. When these vibrant New Britons commit atrocities, the liberals are “shocked.” But that hasn’t been their only response. Denis “The Slug” MacShane got his priorities right: he thought of himself and his bank balance:

    Rotherham’s former Labour MP has broken his silence on the child abuse scandal, from the comfort of the Dordogne [a region of France where rich Britons take holidays]:

  Anyone interested in Rotherham child abuse might read p 156 of my Prison Diaries @BitebackPub—
  Denis MacShane (@DenisMacShane) August 26, 2014

  Or you could just read the 160-page report which covers the time Denis was the local Labour MP and seemingly oblivious to what was happening on his patch and the failings of his friends and allies on the local Labour council.

  Far more insightful, and free. (MacShame Uses Rotherham Scandal to Plug New Book, Guido Fawkes blog, 27th August 2014)

MacShane was jailed in December 2013 for submitting fraudulent expenses as part of his tireless pro-Jewish, anti-fascist campaigning. The Jewish Chronicle celebrated him as “one of the community’s greatest champions” and said “we should mourn Denis MacShane’s fall from grace.”

While MacShane was championing Jews and their interests, what was he doing for White girls in Rotherham? Nothing, it appears:

  Denis MacShane: I was too much of a ‘liberal leftie’ and should have done more to investigate child abuse

  Denis MacShane, the former Labour MP for Rotherham, has admitted that as a “Guardian reading liberal leftie” he shied away from the issue of the oppression of women in the Muslim community. Mr MacShane, who resigned in 2012 over an expenses fraud for which he was later jailed, insisted no-one came to him with child abuse allegations during his 18 years in Parliament, but admitted he should have “burrowed into” the issue.

  He told the BBC: “I think there was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat if I may put it like that.” Admitting he had been guilty of doing too little, he said he had been aware of the problem of cousin marriage and “the oppression of women within bits of the Muslim community in Britain” but: “Perhaps yes, as a true Guardian reader, and liberal leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard.”

  He recalled having a “huge row” with another local MP and council grandees because they were complaining about a newspaper investigation into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, which unearthed uncomfortable truths they did not want to hear. (Denis MacShane: I was too much of a ‘liberal leftie’ and should have done more to investigate child abuse, The Daily Telegraph, 27th August 2014)

MacShane is a dedicated opponent of Nick Griffin, the former leader of the British National Party. Griffin knew all about sex-crimes by Muslims and made a speech condemning it in 2004, a full decade ago.

What was the reaction of our liberal elite, including Denis MacShane? It put Griffin on trial twice, using secret recordings by the BBC as evidence of his thought-crimes but failing to get a conviction.

Meanwhile, the elite allowed the sex-crimes to continue. Have liberals apologized and admitted that Griffin was right? Of course not. Have liberals admitted their direct responsibility for the horrors in Rotherham? Of course not. In fact, a familiar figure called Sue Berelowitz has reacted with breathtaking chutzpah, confirming my belief that she belongs to the “community” championed by MacShane for so long:

  ‘Culture of denial’ leaving UK children at risk of serious abuse: Deputy children’s commissioner Sue Berelowitz says, despite Rotherham and gang violence cases elsewhere, police and authorities are practising ‘wilful blindness’

  Children are at risk of serious abuse across England because of a culture of “wilful blindness” about the scale and prevalence of sexual exploitation across swaths of local government and in police forces, the deputy children’s commissioner warns. In a highly critical interview given in the aftermath of the Rotherham abuse inquiry, which concluded that hundreds of children may have been abused there over a 16-year period, Sue Berelowitz said she had been “aghast” at the examples of obvious errors and poor practice she found.

  Berelowitz told the Guardian she had discovered that police and council officers were in some cases still either looking the other way, not asking questions or claiming abuse was confined to a certain ethnic group – such as Asian men – or a particular social class. Berelowitz is the author of a detailed report into child sexual exploitation in gangs and groups last year following a series of high-profile cases in towns such as Rochdale [involving non-White Muslims] and Oxford [involving non-White Muslims] as well as Rotherham.

  On a recent field visit to a police force, Berelowitz was surprised to learn that the officers’ top search on their internal computer profiling system was “Asian male”. When she asked what would happen if the perpetrators were not Asian, the officer in charge replied that the force was “not looking for those”. “I was astonished. I said: ‘I think you better start looking.’” [...]

  Berelowitz said she was shocked to discover that although “there had been progress” by authorities in the aftermath of the grisly series of gang-rape and trafficking scandals, “there are still instances of not looking, of wilful blindness. We have to be careful none of us is in denial about the terrible reality of what happened in places like Rochdale and Rotherham.” (‘Culture of denial’ leaving UK children at risk of serious abuse, The Guardian, 28th August 2014).


Grin when you’re spinning: Shocked Sue Berelowitz

Read Tobias Langdon’s full article at The Occidental Observer:

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/crock-of-shock-liberal-responses-to-vibrant-depravity/


MacDonald comments:

Kevin MacDonald
August 31, 2014 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

That’s the problem. So many White people want to be considered good people, admired by others. Paragons of goodness. We desperately want to be part of a moral community, to be seen by others as having an impeccable reputation, etc. The academic world is full of White people who want to be considered a saint. This is the intuitive basis for the idea that establishing groups on the basis of moral reputation rather than kinship is the key to understanding Europeans. And because our culture is dominated by hostile elites creating moral communities that are fundamentally opposed to our interests, it’s killing us.


2

Posted by Guest Lurker on Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:42 | #

What a bunch of contemptible filthy depraved cowards the English are to allow this. The lowest of the low. The police were actually complicit in aiding the rapists.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28949188

But at least you don’t speak German today. That’s what counts, right? You got what you fought for. Karma. Same goes for the Anglo-Americans. There really does seem to be karmic justice in this universe.


3

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:50 | #

Whereas the Whites in Los Angeles would never stand for this!


4

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:38 | #

Thank you, Prof MacDonald! That Western Man = Ethical Man has been my loudly proclaimed insight for decades. It is why I’m back doing doctoral work in Catholicism. WPs must find ways to reach the white majority by appealing to the true morality of WP, and the real evil of multiculturalism and race mixture. Merely discussing matters in terms of up/down assessments of EGI is never going to be a rhetorical winner among the majority of whites.


5

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:06 | #

Though raised a Catholic, MacDonald is not a Christian.

Though seeing the necessity for moral orders and recommending moral community, MR is not a Catholic site specifically nor a Christian site generally.

It rather favors uncovering that which is reverence inspiring closer to E.G.I. indeed, and therefore discussions closer in regard thereof.


* I resisted the temptation to comment on Catholicism’s reputation of pedophilia.


6

Posted by Mick Lately on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:46 | #

No True Scotsman


7

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:19 | #

Swiss Member of Parliament Oskar Freysinger Has (Also) Had Enough

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IXsTKzOTvo


8

Posted by Guest Blogger on Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:23 | #

A Day in Rotherham

Published by Max Musson

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/a-day-in-rotherham/

By Shaun de Moray:

Our coach left Thurrock Services at 7:00 a.m. and I soon realised that some of us were from the BNP, some were from the NF, some from the EDL, and others, like myself, from Western Spring. None of us particularly cared what organisation the others belonged to — we were racial brothers and sisters united by a common ideal: the desire to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children — and of course, if we are to win back control of our country, this is how it must be.

I admit I was a little nervous during the journey. Anyone with any political savvy knows that the regime under which we live is anti-White and I envisioned a familiar scenario with state-funded UAF turning up to throw bottles, bricks and punches at us and being allowed by the police to get away with it. The cause of my nervousness was not however fear of the UAF, but fear of what I might do in response. My fear was that I wouldn’t be able to control myself and that I might end up getting arrested for unleashing the anger that I feel upon one of those loathsome counter-demonstrators.

...

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/a-day-in-rotherham/

 


9

Posted by Guest on Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:44 | #

GW why do you put up with anti-English venom?

The hatred for all things English especially Kevin MacDonald and Guest Lurker is shocking.

As for bad Karma did the English have anything to do with the Hispanification of America?

Why dont the Americans stop speaking English and stop using Common Law if they loathe England so much.

Its shocking that real Germans arent as anti-English as these part German Americans. Checkout DW TV which is stuffed with the English.

Thats why a Yes vote will be good.


10

Posted by Rotherham mother on Sun, 28 Sep 2014 07:37 | #

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1OjMjmIYCg

Mother of child abuse victim speaking in Rotherham


11

Posted by Rotherham whistleblower threatened on Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:51 | #

Rotherham abuse whistleblower was threatened by police & given “race awareness training”

<iframe width=“560” height=“315” src=”//www.youtube.com/embed/RMzH8_x_MfQ” frameborder=“0” allowfullscreen></iframe>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMzH8_x_MfQ#t=87


12

Posted by Neuvo morals bourgeois & Rotherham on Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:44 | #

Rotherham the fruition of upper class nouveau moralism - PC


How Political Correctness Aided and Abetted Sex Crimes in England
The troubling lesson of the Rotherham crimes.

http://reason.com/archives/2015/02/12/political-correctness?utm_campaign=naytev&utm_content=54dd15ede4b08f8008d0c6c0

Brendan O’Neill | February 12, 2015

“To see the true dread impact of political correctness, look beyond the attitude-policing antics of the pampered imbeciles stinking up America’s Ivy League campuses and Britain’s top universities. Instead, cast your gaze to a town called Rotherham, in Yorkshire in Northern England.”

Working-class, rough, famous for having been one of the beating hearts of the Industrial Revolution, Rotherham is about as far as it’s possible to get from the starched lecture halls of Columbia or the dreaming spires of Oxford.

Yet this once thriving and now economically depressed town, home to 250,000 people, stands as an ugly testament to the grave dangers posed by political correctness, or P.C. For here, P.C. has done rather more than cause irritation to libertarians and liberals who don’t think novels should come with trigger warnings; here, P.C. has allowed young women to get raped.

In the fortnight since Jonathan Chait broke the internet by doing what many a libertarian has been doing for 30 years—criticising P.C.—most of the Johnny Come Latelys to the anti-P.C. party have aimed their ire at the crazier instances of speech-policing and word-watching.

They’ve put the boot into students’ sociopathic insistence that we use mad words like “cis” or have railed against academics’ acquiescence to the transformation of universities into kindergartens for outsized offence-takers.

But beyond all this admittedly scary/hilarious stuff, there’s a far larger and harder-to-criticise problem—P.C.’s invasion of everyday life; its movement from colleges into the concrete worlds of politics, society, and community relations. Consider Rotherham.

Major official inquiries, including one published last week, have discovered that in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, around 1,400 young people, mainly white working-class girls, were sexually exploited and abused by gangs of men, most of them of Pakistani Muslim heritage.

The girls, mostly poor, vulnerable, and from broken families, were groomed by the men and passed around as sexual playthings. Some were prostituted; many were plied with drugs and alcohol.

What does this have to do with P.C.? P.C. facilitated these crimes; it aided and abetted them.

The left-leaning Labour-run local council in Rotherham was so hamstrung by P.C., so riven with what the U.K. Home Secretary Theresa May has called “institutionalised political correctness,” that it was reluctant to investigate or talk openly about the Pakistani men’s sex crimes for fear of appearing racist and demeaning an ethnic minority.

All of the major investigations into this 16-year-long reign of abuse by gangs of Pakistani men have fingered P.C. as one of the key reasons the men’s behaviour did not come fully to light earlier.

In last week’s report, commissioned by the government and overseen by Louise Casey, an official who specializes in social welfare, Rotherham is described as having had a culture of “political correctness, incompetence and cover-up,” which “allowed gangs of Asian men to get away with child abuse for years.” Casey found that Rotherham “suppressed” the issue of Asian abuse gangs out of a “fear of being branded racist.”

Her findings echo those of Alexis Jay, a professor of public policy, who last year chaired the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham. Jay likewise found among officials in Rotherham a “nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of [the] perpetrators for fear of being thought racist.”

Theresa May describes it as “institutionalised political correctness.” She says P.C. was so entrenched in Rotherham that some of the victims’ “cries for help” were actively ignored by officials who did not want a national spotlight to be shone on the problem of Pakistani abuse of largely white girls. The girls were ushered away, sent back to their abusers, effectively, by officials who did not want to break the first rule of P.C.: Never let any culture or community be subjected to public criticism or ridicule. Well, what’s a few rapes compared with maintaining Britain’s multicultural mush of respect for all identities?

The P.C.-inspired lethargy of local officialdom in Rotherham meant it fell to the media to uncover the abuse scandal. The Times in particular was dogged in its determination to highlight the scourge of Pakistani gangs grooming young women: its reporting led to the first court case, in 2010, 13 years after the gang’s lawlessness first kicked off, in which five Pakistani men were found guilty of grooming three girls, two aged 13 and one 15, and using them for sex. More men have since been arrested. Some of the victims have recently given interviews, describing how they were disbelieved and shushed by officials—officials more concerned with appearing right-on than doing what was right.

The Rotherham debacle captures the most terrifying thing about P.C.—how it discourages, paralyses, in fact, moral judgement; how it strangles critical thinking and common, human decency in favour of turning everyone into obedient nodding robots who promise never to break the First Commandment of P.C.: Thou Shalt Not Offend.

P.C.’s insistence that all cultures are equally valid, and that inciting concern about the behavior of individuals from any particular identity group is a really bad thing to do, led directly to a situation where young people could be raped.

The thing Chait got most wrong in his New York essay was his claim that, after it first burst onto the academic scene in the late 1980s, P.C. “went into a long remission” and is only now returning. Not so. In those 25 years, P.C. silently, and mostly uncontroversially, colonized more and more areas of life across Western Europe and the U.S., including the military, politics, education, and community life and politics.
rsalism, tolerance, and freedom. For this, in essence, is what P.C. represents—not simply the harebrained schemes of spoilt students who want to shut down debate, but a new, hastily constructed, and speedily spreading moral system that might replace the morality of old that has withered and lies gasping for breath.

The end result? Rotherham. A town in a modern, democratic nation where elected officials had elevated offence-avoidance and non-judgementalism to such a dizzying height that they could not allow something so seemingly petty as young women’s pleas to be protected from rape to derail their P.C. project.

The irony is almost too much to bear. Well-off, middle-class students and academics unleash a new morality which they claim will, among other things, protect women from harmful words and images, yet in Rotherham it helps to subject women to unspeakable forms of abuse. “P.C. is simply about providing vulnerable students with a safe space!” they crow. Not in Rotherham, it isn’t—there, P.C., with its pathological allergy to giving offence to any culture, made a whole town into a dangerous space, a violent, rapacious space, for numerous girls and women.


Brendan O’Neill is editor of spiked in London.


13

Posted by Muslim crime symptomatic on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:26 | #

On Muslim Crime, Genetics and the Rape of Europe

February 22, 2015 — Andrew Joyce

Another day, another Muslim-perpetrated shooting in Europe. And despite the gunman having the rather un-European name of Omar El-Hussein, the incident has provided yet more opportunities for redundant warnings against ‘European’ anti-Semitism. These killings, like those in Paris, disturb and irritate me for a number of reasons.

Firstly, and most obviously, I am troubled at the perpetration of Islamic murder and lawlessness in Europe. Secondly, media representations of these events refuse to disclose that they are a product of disastrous immigration and foreign policies — policies which have been demonstrably influenced by Jews.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/02/on-muslim-crime-genetics-and-the-rape-of-europe/#more-26795


14

Posted by Milliband exploiting fears on Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:08 | #

“Here’s the problem I have with you, Nigel. You want to exploit people’s fears rather than deal with them.”

When Farage once more mentioned the popular viewpoint that the National Health Service should actually be “national” instead of “international,” Milliband got his cue and immediately went for his carefully rehearsed lines with the alacrity of a gunfighter reaching for his pistol. You could almost hear the cogs and gears turning in his head as he modulated his voice and adjusted his posture to sound ever so reasonable and even mildly sympathetic to Farage:

  “Here’s the problem I have with you, Nigel. You want to exploit people’s fears rather than deal with them.”

Perhaps the only thing comparable to this climate of fear would have been to be called a witch in the 17th-century. The R-word evokes a visceral terror that makes people’s palms sweat, their throats dry, and their legs go weak at the knees (now it becomes apparent why these debates are held standing up!).

It is a fear of social ostracism and losing one’s job, of just generally being thought of as a “nasty piece of work.” It is this fear, inculcated into the people of Britain, that has been exploited again and again by unscrupulous politicians like Milliband, bent on importing an additional electorate, lowering wages, and crowding Britain to maintain property prices. It this fear that drove the BNP into the political wasteland, and it is this fear that leads UKIP to water down its policies and rig its candidate lists in a forlorn attempt to counter the inevitable accusations.

Fake asylum seekers and non-Whites seeking undeserved placement, preference, and legalistic leniency have also jumped on this bandwagon of fear. But worst of all, it has been exploited by the Muslim pedophile rape gangs and their enablers in the police and social services in towns like Rotherham. It is the exploitation of this fear that has allowed the mass rape of English children on an industrial scale for decades, and which ensures that those responsible, like the leadership of the Labour Party, can still pass beneath lamp posts instead of swinging from them.

 



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: “Wise men see outlines and therefore they draw them”
Previous entry: Britain’s Camp of The Saints

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:21. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:50. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:13. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:09. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:24. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:16. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:20. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:54. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:47. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:19. (View)

affection-tone