Jewish vs. Euro-American Voting Patterns

The first chart, below, shows Euro-American voting patterns on immigration restriction legislation taken from http://www.betterimmigration.com , and it shows great diversity. In contrast the chart of Jewish votes shows a hardened and tight grouping. Since Jewish voting, at least in this sample, is so consistent it seems able to tip the balance in its favor on this important issue.

Perhaps an examination of other controversial subjects of special concern to Jews would reveal a similar pattern? I wonder if the patterns of Black and Hispanic ethic blocks are as disciplined.

Euro-American Voting Patterns on Immigration Restriction Legislation

image

Jewish Voting Patterns on Immigration Restriction Legislation

 

image

1=A=Most Restrictive Position
5=F=Least Restrictive Position

 

Posted by leslie on Wednesday, September 28, 2005 at 09:26 AM in Jewish Diaspora
Comments (32) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Bob on September 28, 2005, 04:23 PM | #

Are not jews also european?

2

Posted by Guessedworker on September 28, 2005, 04:38 PM | #

Jews are not European Caucasians.

3

Posted by Desmond Jones on September 28, 2005, 06:17 PM | #

Geoff,

The average career score assigned by BI ranging from 100% for Barrett of SC to 1% for Pelosi of CA was 50.18%. Replacing the scores for Jewish representatives with 100% changed the overall average mark assigned by BI to 53.21%. It’s not clear, IMO, that the Jews tip the scales on the immigration issue. Undoubtedly they vote as a block but if Euro-Americans wanted to take up this issue, it would roll home. However, it’s apparent they don’t.

4

Posted by Geoff Beck on September 28, 2005, 06:26 PM | #

> Euro-Americans wanted to take up this issue, it would roll home. However, it’s apparent they don’t.

Who is going to report this story Desmond, the Jewish controlled media? The very same group that lobbied incessantly since 1924 to 1965 to change the laws to open up the invasion!

Get real.

BTW Desmond, do you know who Izzy Asper is? He is the chap that owns most of your media in Canada. Don’t expect to hear much debate about that, hate crimes being what they are today.

Have you ever read this data in Izzy’s newspapers?

5

Posted by JW Holliday on September 28, 2005, 06:40 PM | #

Geoff, this is excellent; always good to see a quantitative (or at least, semi-quantitative) representation of the differing interests of Jewish-Americans vs European-Americans.  We need more of this, and we need it to be publicized.

I am interested as well in carefully crafted public opinion polls, with questions that can reveal the fissure lines that exist in America based on competing ethnic interests.

Balkanize, balkanize, balkanize!

Geoff, I can suggest you contact the NPI with this; they may consider this (semi) quantitative methodology of interest in some research projects.  Let’s see how people really differ in America, and how ethnicity not only trumps ideology, but, more realistically, how ethnicity influences ideology.

The politics of exclusion - let us do it!

6

Posted by Geoff Beck on September 28, 2005, 06:44 PM | #

JW,

This information is so easy to find and and handle. I’ll be publishing a lot more about the voting patterns of the tribes.

Balkanize, Balkanize, Balkanize.

7

Posted by Desmond Jones on September 28, 2005, 11:41 PM | #

Who is going to report this story Desmond, the Jewish controlled media?

Lou Dobbs has reported on the immigration issue almost every night for at least a year, Geoff. Who cares if the Jews lobbied for it for a hundred years. If white Americans in the House or Senate, or Bush really cared immigration would end. And the Jews, block or no block could do nothing about it. White American politicians hold the power but they won’t exercise it. Why, because it’s a license for the few to print money.

Notwithstanding the fact that Izzy’s been dead for almost two years and didn’t fully acquire the National Post from Conrad Black until 2001 (when did you ever see this data in Black’s papers) when have Americans ever cared what goes on in Canada? Canada influences the US about as much as Chad. And why should it be any different? Canada is a frozen, obtuse backwater of the Empire. Hewers of wood, drawers of water. If Americans wanted to do this it’s well within their power and blaming the Jews is not a reason, but, with all due respect, just an excuse.

8

Posted by AD on September 29, 2005, 05:02 AM | #

If Americans wanted to do this it’s well within their power

Politically?Maybe 15 years ago.The united minority voting bloc(including white homosexuals + whites with non-white partners) is now too big.This is the point of intentional ‘diversity’,to stop the majority acting in its own interest.It was this same exact tactic that handed Russia to the non-Russian bolsheviks and their revenge driven ‘minority’ minions.Multiculturalism is a struggle for power.It cannot go on indefinitely…..the balance of power eventually swings.Western man will probably never learn not to be coaxed into allowing minority groups in.His charity always getting in the way of historical lessons.

The only choice now for many western nations is voluntary internal separation.

9

Posted by dlg on September 29, 2005, 06:29 AM | #

Notwithstanding the fact that Izzy’s been dead for almost two years…

LOL, a dead guy owns all the media in Canada? That’s f—ked up.

10

Posted by Geoff Beck on September 29, 2005, 08:53 AM | #

Dlg:

Old Izzy died, eh. Well, when he sent his note ORDERING his editorialists not to write bad things about Israel it must have aged him a bit?

Well, I’m sure his sons are in control of his media empire now. I don’t watch the Canadian media as closely as I do in the US, but I’d bet Jews still own 90% or more of your media.

Hey, Dlg, aren’t you fearing arrest just writing on this blog? Organized Jewish groups have a record of opposing free speech. Now that is really, lets see, how did you say,... “fu-ked up”.

11

Posted by Svigor on September 29, 2005, 11:52 AM | #

Here, as everywhere else, people seem to be operating under the illusion that the MSM isn’t in reality the first estate, with veto power over the second estate (the political class); it is.

That throws quite the monkey wrench in those who want to discount jewish power in this equation.

Do I blame the jews for everything?  No.  Am I able to draw a line (between jewish power and Euro power) as clearly as some here seem able to?  No.

12

Posted by ben tillman on September 29, 2005, 05:46 PM | #

Here, as everywhere else, people seem to be operating under the illusion that the MSM isn’t in reality the first estate, with veto power over the second estate (the political class); it is.

Exactly.  The case of Richard Nixon is illustrative.

13

Posted by dlg on September 30, 2005, 07:50 AM | #

Hey, Dlg, aren’t you fearing arrest just writing on this blog?

No.

14

Posted by Stanley Womack on March 14, 2007, 12:27 PM | #

Svigor says, “Here, as everywhere else, people seem to be operating under the illusion that the MSM isn’t in reality the first estate, with veto power over the second estate (the political class); it is.”

Exactly the reason why our principal task at this time in our histories is to establish a European & European Diaspora News Agency, to get the word out to our children & grandchildren how to liberate themselves from the blood libels attached to our kin.

15

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on March 14, 2007, 01:30 PM | #

Bob asks, “Are not jews also European?”  No, Bob, they are Semitic.  If a Jew doesn’t like what a White person says or does about Jews, no matter how honest or nice the criticism, the Jew will call the White person an anti-Semite and/or racist.  This proves that Jews consider themselves different from Whites.

16

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 14, 2007, 05:11 PM | #

Yeah, jews are European when it suits them, other when it doesn’t.

Only people who aren’t can do that.

Jews accept none of the baggage of being white (e.g., white guilt), hence they’re faux white.

Plus it’s a semantic question - genes aside, they’re mentally other by definition, so who cares what continent they’re from.

17

Posted by ben tillman on March 14, 2007, 06:05 PM | #

By their own definition.  They opted out of our moral community thousands of years ago.  We have repeatedly tried to assimilate them into that community, but it has never worked.

18

Posted by Matra on March 15, 2007, 06:32 AM | #

BTW Desmond, do you know who Izzy Asper is? He is the chap that owns most of your media in Canada

Asper was influential and his empire still is but he didn’t control most of the Canadian media. Global (TV network) though it has widely watched news broadcasts is nowhere near as influential as the CBC - which incidentally is generally pro-Palestinian - or CTV. The National Post is not as influential as the Globe & Mail or the Toronto Star. Though Jews are, of course,  overrepresented at virtually all Canadian media outlets, including all the above, saying Izzy Asper “owns” or since he’s long dead, owned most of the media just plays into the hands of those who would dismiss all critics of Jewish influence as nutters.

(Another Canadian newspaper chain, the Sun, which is Jewish-owned used to print anti-immigrant colomns on an almost daily basis. This was in the late 80s, early 90s. They don’t seem to touch immigration anymore.)

Lou Dobbs has reported on the immigration issue almost every night for at least a year, Geoff. Who cares if the Jews lobbied for it for a hundred years. If white Americans in the House or Senate, or Bush really cared immigration would end

Dobbs has seen his ratings double since taking up immigration and free trade. But still the last time I saw numbers on this he was only getting about 1.2 million viewers at most. Some on FOX with similar numbers have taken up the issue from time to time but in a country of 300 million that doesn’t amount to much. Even if talk radio is included most Americans are still getting their news (thosse that actually bother to pay attention to such things) from traditional liberal sources that are overwhelmingly pro-race replacement. If the media were to report on crimes and other problems associated with illegals with the same enthusiasm they do on the plight of these poor foreigners “who just want to work” there would be more political pressure on politicians to act. So Geoff’s point about Jews and other minorities (some European) in the media preventing a reaction still stands.

19

Posted by Artaxerxes M. Garcia on March 20, 2007, 02:39 AM | #

http://www.anonym.to/? to gnxp.com Here is the idea,, the Jews would like to be identified with their religion than their race, just like the Muslims..
  Hence, whenever you see a jew, you ask him “Hey are you a French?” He’ll tell you “No, I’m Jewish-French” Juslike in the Philippines..when you found a Muslim, he’ll rather be identified with his religion more than his race! goddammit!
  Such is the the destructive orthodoxy of these breed of Ishmael in that, fanatisicm to them is merely ordinary and quoutidian

20

Posted by Constantin von Hoffmeister on March 20, 2007, 05:57 AM | #

“Jews are not European Caucasians.”

Ashkenazi Jews sure are.

Constantin

21

Posted by red roasting rodents on March 20, 2007, 06:59 AM | #

“Ashkenazi Jews sure are.”

Prove it.  genetic evidence please, not your Sailerian subjective bullshit.

22

Posted by red roasting rodents on March 20, 2007, 07:13 AM | #

http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/90/7/2654/F4

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2006/01/matrilineal-ancestry-of-ashkenazi-jews.html

http://www.sdss.jhu.edu/~ethan/jFAQ.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9326232&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14740294&query_hl=9&itool=pubmed_docsum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10801975&query_hl=9&itool=pubmed_docsum

http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0020143.eor

On the other side, we’ll get, “hey, I saw a blonde, blue eyed Jewish guy walking down the street the other day.”

I guess then that Sailer’s “Eric-Idle-looking Pakastani Tribesman” is “European” also. 

We are entering an era where these questions can actually be answered independent of anecdotes and personal opinions.

A historical question as well: if Ashkenazi Jews are native, indigenous Europeans, what is their native land?  After all, Germans have Germany, Italians, Italy, English, England, so…

23

Posted by red roasting rodents on March 20, 2007, 10:25 AM | #

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

“This suggested that the male ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews could be traced mostly to the Middle East.”

“More recent research indicates that a significant portion of Ashkenazi maternal ancestry is also of Middle Eastern origin. A 2006 study by Behar et al[11], based on haplotype analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), suggested that about 40% of the current Ashkenazi population is descended matrilineally from just four women. These four “founder lineages” were “likely from a Hebrew/Levantine mtDNA pool” originating in the Near East in the first and second centuries CE. According to the authors, “The observed global pattern of distribution renders very unlikely the possibility that the four aforementioned founder lineages entered the Ashkenazi mtDNA pool via gene flow from a European host population.”

Unfortunately, the above data come from uniparentally inherited markers that essentially act as single loci in population genetics studies, and can be significantly influenced by stochastic processes (nevertheless, we see the direction of the data).  We await a definitive analysis of Jewish autosomal DNA, which would have the power to better answer these questions.

One big problem with autosomal studies which have already been done is that they tend to make the a priori decision (not supported by historical evidence or data from the uniparental markers) to attempt to cluster Ashkenazi along the European spectrum of populations, rather than examining the various Caucasian sub-races in more detail.  So here, we have:
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=slideshow&type=figure&doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0020143&id=62709

Note though that the although the Ashkenazim are called “the Jews of Northern, Eastern, and Central Europe”, they cluster with the Southern group.  Of course, that latter clustering is not very informative because, given only two choices, the Ashkenazim would have to fall into one of the two (but not in the cluster along with the host populations).  Note however that if we look along a west-east gradient of each of the clusters, the Ashkenazim are way at the top – the eastern end – of the Southern cluster.  In other words, forcing the Ashkenazim into a European-specific clustering scheme results in their occupying the most extreme end of the genetic gradient.

Then we have this analysis, which again compares Ashkenazim with Europeans – and Armenians – and we note the similarity to Armenians and Greeks, and a lack of significant similarity to the host populations of North/Central Europe, as well as significant differences with the Spanish and Italian samples:
http://dienekes.angeltowns.net/articles/fallmerayer/european.jpg

DNAPrint also has Ashkenazi data, but they make the numerical data for this group available only for the racial ABD2.5 test and not for the sub-racial Euro 1.0 test.  However, for the latter test, they do provide a pie chart figure which shows Ashkenazim (placed on Israel) and that chart shows a level of “Middle Eastern” specific ancestry considerably greater than any European group studied, and greater than Turks as well.

Based on all these data, it is likely that further autosomal studies will confirm the other findings for an essentially recent, historical Middle Eastern origin for the Ashkenazim.  Granted, it is also likely that some signs of admixture may be found; we await the results.

24

Posted by r.r. rodents on March 20, 2007, 10:52 AM | #

“not your Sailerian subjective bullshit.”

My apologies for using the vulgarity, which was uncalled for and lowers the tone of the discourse.  Using the adjective “Sailerian” was bad enough.

So, let me rephrase in a suitable manner:
“not in a subjective, Sailerian manner.”

Nevertheless, the problem remains.  We have a difference of opinion as to the classification of the Ashkenazim.  Shouldn’t the data have the last word?

25

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on March 20, 2007, 01:38 PM | #

Fred,
Rush is a traitor both to his nation and to his country.  He sold out years ago.  I would never trust anything he says anymore.  He, like Sean Hannity, O’Reilly, et al, is only good for spreading undiluted RNC propaganda.  But then, it should be no surprise. What tribe controls the networks he depends on to stay on the air?  What political party is he beholden to, other than the one that is has been purchased by mega-corporate global businesses; the same party that is actively working with the Democrats (via that wonderful “bipartanship”) to bring about the North American Union.

26

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 20, 2007, 05:18 PM | #

Robert of the Rohirrim, notice that apart from his total silence on forced population transfers Rush has never once broached the subject of the North American Union which Lou Dobbs has covered at least half-a-dozen times.  No one can call him racist for bringing that up — as they might if he brought up immigration — yet he’s silent, and it’s a hard to imagine an issue more huge than that.  There’s something very wrong with Rush, I agree.

27

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 20, 2007, 05:43 PM | #

Notice how in the synopsis of the article linked by “r. r. rodent” the authors feel the only way they can claim legitimacy for the line of research is by postulating a potential medical benefit.  Otherwise they’d be shouted down as racists.  The claim of medical benefit is the modern version of the garlic hung around the neck by old-time Romanians — keeps the vampires at a distance. 

SYNOPSIS

Two unrelated persons in the human population have hundreds of thousands of base pair differences between them in DNA sequence. Previous studies have shown that a small proportion of these sequence differences correlate with a person’s continental ancestry: broadly, Asia, Africa Oceana, America, or continental Europe. In the current study, DNA differences within a particular continental group, Europe, were examined. Overall, the analysis of sequence variation allowed the authors to distinguish individuals with northern European ancestry (Swedish, English, Irish, German, and Ukrainian) from individuals with southern European ancestry (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Greek). Interestingly, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals tend to group together with individuals from southern European countries. This study is important because it provides a method of taking into account these differences when searching for genetic variations that are associated with particular human traits, such as disease susceptibility, response to drug treatment, or side effects from therapy. Specifically, these methods may allow scientists to uncover disease-associated genetic variations that might be hidden unless differences related to European ancestry are considered.

28

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 20, 2007, 05:56 PM | #

(Forgot the link.)

29

Posted by Kenneth on March 16, 2008, 02:54 AM | #

Jewish is a religion, but it is associated with an ethnic identity. Jews have lived in Europe for ages, but in genetic numerous genetic studies they often show up as genetically distinct, being amazingly homogeneous -at least in the ones ive seen. They are near easterners (evidenced by the high presence of haplogroups J1 and J2 as well as E3b). Near easterners like Arabs and Persians arent too far from European norms on these genetic studies by the way…

30

Posted by Artaxerxes M. Garcia on April 04, 2010, 02:11 PM | #

Hahaha, suya mo tanan…

Here are some rhetorical questions:

Isn’t it true that the Israelis have been the oldest surviving race in the world? Were not their specineb the most robust? They are not only ancient in origin but are also prolific in population, influential and rich in wherever they are.

Were not their decendants such historic titans? (Remember Einstein, Freud,
Bernstein, Alicia Silverstone, Levis Strauss, Calvin Klein, Daniel Radcliffe, and Jesus -the True God)

Were not they the richest people in America?

Were not their laws largely influential in shaping the rest of the world’s judicial processes and conscience?

Was not Hebrew the first and the most ancient of all languages? (It’s not the Summerians or Akkadians—- You must understand that modern historians tried so much to discredit the Jews out of their prejudices and ani-Semitism towards these people. This is why most books in our libraries authored by western minds would not acknowledge the fact that Hebrew is humanity’s first and original language, the most ancient of all languages)

Where did we got both our religious and intellectual traditions, were it not from them? If there were no Jews who tranlsated the writings of the western mathematicians during Greece’s golden age, how would the moderns have their physics and geometry?

Though gentiles tend to discriminate them, the Jews are still more to be envied than to be despised.

And because their God is unseen, it fosters in them a feeling of cultural superiority, while the rest of the nations would try to appear magnificent by multiplying their idolatries through the works of art. The Jews have understood what it meant to keep the second commandment: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images.” Although this had inhibited their artistic spirit, on the positive strand it lifts them above the mundane things of the world that are apparent, seemly, but changing. And they have the faith that irrevocably fixes itself upon the changing.

No matter the hatred, the pogrom, the slander; no matter all the genius of the world to combine against them, they still are the “proud sabras.”

If you ask Christ about the superiority of their religion which is above Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, yoga, Brahma kumaris, and etc., He’ll certainly repeat what He said two thousand years ago: “we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22).

Are we envious of the Jews of their religion? of their intelligence? of their physique? of their versatility in the world?

Of course we are! And if you are not envious, you lie. Reason demands that the Jews are the superior race on earth. Inwardly we are convinced that they are no pretenders, but that they are actually so -the great and superior decendants of YaHWeH, -the God Who had always been obsessed with them, but with Whom they are not truly obsessed.

31

Posted by Artaxerxes M. Garcia on April 04, 2010, 02:14 PM | #

Hahaha, suya mo tanan…

Here are some rhetorical questions:

Isn’t it true that the Israelis have been the oldest surviving race in the world? Were not their specimen the most robust? They are not only ancient in origin but are also prolific in population, influential and rich in wherever they are.

Were not their decendants such historic titans? (Remember Einstein, Freud,
Bernstein, Alicia Silverstone, Levis Strauss, Calvin Klein, Daniel Radcliffe, and Jesus -the True God)

Were not they the richest people in America?

Were not their laws largely influential in shaping the rest of the world’s judicial processes and conscience?

Was not Hebrew the first and the most ancient of all languages? (It’s not the Summerians or Akkadians—- You must understand that modern historians tried so much to discredit the Jews out of their prejudices and ani-Semitism towards these people. This is why most books in our libraries authored by western minds would not acknowledge the fact that Hebrew is humanity’s first and original language, the most ancient of all languages)

Where did we got both our religious and intellectual traditions, were it not from them? If there were no Jews who tranlsated the writings of the western mathematicians during Greece’s golden age, how would the moderns have their physics and geometry?

Though gentiles tend to discriminate them, the Jews are still more to be envied than to be despised.

And because their God is unseen, it fosters in them a feeling of cultural superiority, while the rest of the nations would try to appear magnificent by multiplying their idolatries through the works of art. The Jews have understood what it meant to keep the second commandment: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images.” Although this had inhibited their artistic spirit, on the positive strand it lifts them above the mundane things of the world that are apparent, seemly, but changing. And they have the faith that irrevocably fixes itself upon the changing.

No matter the hatred, the pogrom, the slander; no matter all the genius of the world to combine against them, they still are the “proud sabras.”

If you ask Christ about the superiority of their religion which is above Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, yoga, Brahma kumaris, and etc., He’ll certainly repeat what He said two thousand years ago: “we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22).

Are we envious of the Jews of their religion? of their intelligence? of their physique? of their versatility in the world?

Of course we are! And if you are not envious, you lie. Reason demands that the Jews are the superior race on earth. Inwardly we are convinced that they are no pretenders, but that they are actually so -the great and superior decendants of YaHWeH, -the God Who had always been obsessed with them, but with Whom they are not truly obsessed.

32

Posted by Artaxerxes M. Garcia on April 04, 2010, 02:20 PM | #

i mispelled the word specimen into *specineb..

Hahaha, suya mo tanan…

Here are some rhetorical questions:

Isn’t it true that the Israelis have been the oldest surviving race in the world? Were not their specimen the most robust? They are not only ancient in origin but are also prolific in population, influential and rich in wherever they are.

Were not their decendants such historic titans? (Remember Einstein, Freud,
Bernstein, Alicia Silverstone, Levis Strauss, Calvin Klein, Daniel Radcliffe, and Jesus -the True God)

Were not they the richest people in America?

Were not their laws largely influential in shaping the rest of the world’s judicial processes and conscience?

Was not Hebrew the first and the most ancient of all languages? (It’s not the Summerians or Akkadians—- You must understand that modern historians tried so much to discredit the Jews out of their prejudices and ani-Semitism towards these people. This is why most books in our libraries authored by western minds would not acknowledge the fact that Hebrew is humanity’s first and original language, the most ancient of all languages)

Where did we got both our religious and intellectual traditions, were it not from them? If there were no Jews who tranlsated the writings of the western mathematicians during Greece’s golden age, how would the moderns have their physics and geometry?

Though gentiles tend to discriminate them, the Jews are still more to be envied than to be despised.

And because their God is unseen, it fosters in them a feeling of cultural superiority, while the rest of the nations would try to appear magnificent by multiplying their idolatries through the works of art. The Jews have understood what it meant to keep the second commandment: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images.” Although this had inhibited their artistic spirit, on the positive strand it lifts them above the mundane things of the world that are apparent, seemly, but changing. And they have the faith that irrevocably fixes itself upon the changing.

No matter the hatred, the pogrom, the slander; no matter all the genius of the world to combine against them, they still are the “proud sabras.”

If you ask Christ about the superiority of their religion which is above Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, yoga, Brahma kumaris, and etc., He’ll certainly repeat what He said two thousand years ago: “we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22).

Are we envious of the Jews of their religion? of their intelligence? of their physique? of their versatility in the world?

Of course we are! And if you are not envious, you lie. Reason demands that the Jews are the superior race on earth. Inwardly we are convinced that they are no pretenders, but that they are actually so -the great and superior decendants of YaHWeH, -the God Who had always been obsessed with them, but with Whom they are not truly obsessed.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Next entry: By Their Deeds Ye Shall Know Them!

Previous entry: Muslims have a right to pray but Christians don’t?

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/21/14, 07:38 PM. (go) (view)

BloomIVFCentre commented in entry 'Elitism, secrecy, deception … the way to save white America?' on 08/21/14, 04:49 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Are we to be cannon fodder for war on behalf of White plutocrats?' on 08/21/14, 03:53 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Gregory Bateson on Pathology - Context and Relation' on 08/21/14, 02:20 AM. (go) (view)

A commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 08/20/14, 02:49 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'African-Americans go shopping in Ferguson, Missouri' on 08/20/14, 12:59 PM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Police display new level of force - militarized police deployed in Ferguson riots' on 08/20/14, 12:03 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'On prescriptive ontologies – Part Two, Homo heroicas' on 08/19/14, 11:02 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'Police display new level of force - militarized police deployed in Ferguson riots' on 08/19/14, 09:21 PM. (go) (view)

Anonymous commented in entry 'Oscar Wilde: the straight truth about a “gay” icon' on 08/19/14, 03:57 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pravy Sektor, Ukraine's soldiers of the revolution' on 08/19/14, 12:58 PM. (go) (view)

sasha butakov commented in entry 'Pravy Sektor, Ukraine's soldiers of the revolution' on 08/19/14, 12:44 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Police display new level of force - militarized police deployed in Ferguson riots' on 08/19/14, 09:12 AM. (go) (view)

God help us all commented in entry 'Police display new level of force - militarized police deployed in Ferguson riots' on 08/19/14, 08:40 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'The thread wars: what next?' on 08/19/14, 05:19 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'The thread wars: what next?' on 08/18/14, 09:13 PM. (go) (view)

uKn_Leo commented in entry 'The thread wars: what next?' on 08/18/14, 06:57 PM. (go) (view)

melba peachtoast commented in entry 'Police display new level of force - militarized police deployed in Ferguson riots' on 08/18/14, 04:16 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/18/14, 05:54 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/18/14, 05:26 AM. (go) (view)

Leon commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/18/14, 04:44 AM. (go) (view)

Alexander Baron commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/17/14, 06:41 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Israel’s Modus Operandi: Blackmail, Bribery, and Bullying' on 08/17/14, 12:58 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Israel’s Modus Operandi: Blackmail, Bribery, and Bullying' on 08/14/14, 11:46 PM. (go) (view)

MOB commented in entry 'Israel’s Modus Operandi: Blackmail, Bribery, and Bullying' on 08/14/14, 02:36 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Standing Corrected on the "It's More Than That" to Liberalism's Definition' on 08/14/14, 05:22 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Did I Really See That?' on 08/14/14, 05:02 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/11/14, 06:43 PM. (go) (view)

Alexander Simon commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 08/11/14, 03:47 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/10/14, 11:47 AM. (go) (view)

Chinese man commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle' on 08/10/14, 08:14 AM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/09/14, 03:43 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/08/14, 08:48 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/08/14, 08:22 AM. (go) (view)

P C K commented in entry 'Elitism, secrecy, deception … the way to save white America?' on 08/06/14, 03:32 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Anti-White Media

Audio/Video

Controlled Opposition

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa

affection-tone