A humanitarian approach to overpopulation.

I listen to National Public Radio in Chicago, broadcasting from Navy Pier, because it is one of the few radio signals strong enough to get clearly in my office building. It also is a good way to pick up the news, and to listen to Left wing propaganda—their consistency is phenomenal.

I listened a few days ago to a Marc Gold (web site 100friends.com), who does his part to spread progressive egalitarianism around the globe, and of course to personally get tons of publicity for it. Since 1992, he has hit on his friends and associates to donate money, that he then takes and finds some deserving third-worlders to give aid and comfort to. Talk about a cheap way of collecting moral capital. I give him credit though; I couldn’t do it. I have never been the type to hit on acquaintances for money either for myself or some cause—too independent I guess, and I find such practices very sleazy.

But it did get me thinking about how the Right could put together a similar program. As Marc Gold says, “I was shocked to learn that something so important could be accomplished with so little.” In a similar fashion, we could start 100degenerates.com, a similar organization to help save the planet by using relatively small amounts of money to sterilize the poorest of the poor in underdeveloped countries. That would include paying individuals to voluntarily get sterilized, or pay parents to have their children sterilized; whatever gets the job done. After all, we need to save the planet from these cycles of poverty and overpopulation.

I then wanted to know how easy it would be to sterilize females, as tubule ligation is an operation, and I have heard about chemical means of sterilization. So I did a quick search on Google to find cheaper ways of sterilizing women, and up popped a new product, available in the United States, called ESSURE. It is a procedure where a chemical is placed at the bottom of the fallopian tube that prevents sperm from entering the tube and thus pregnancy. It is permanent (especially for the dirt poor), and it only takes about fifteen minutes. So, a third-world doctor, for a modest sum of money, could easily sterilize about twenty women a day. Using 100freinds criteria then, we could raise modest amounts of money, and direct it towards the poorest parts of the world, to ease the pain of another unfortunate child being born into poverty and despair.

When I was coming of age, the Zero Population Growth organization was pushing for a reduction of births. I thought I would see if my program would agree with their current goals. Well, again a quick Internet search led me to their website, under a new—more politically correct name for the organization—Population Connection (henceforth PC). Turning to their mission statement, I didn’t see anything that they would object to, at least based on what they are trying to accomplish.

For example, they state: “Continued population growth is foremost among the factors aggravating deforestation, wildlife extinction, climate change and other critical environmental and social problems. It also erodes democratic government, multiplies urban problems, consumes agricultural land, increases volumes of waste, heightens competition for scarce resources and threatens the aspirations of the poor for a better life.” Many people are poor because they are not equipped for a modern technological world—they come from population groups with low average intelligence. So my proposal fits PCs objectives.

They also state, “The only acceptable solution to the population problem is through expanding educational, advocacy and service efforts that lower birth rates.” So we need to advocate (indoctrinate) Whites to take positive measures to reduce the birth rate of other races so they will not take away what we have built. Whites are already meeting their own ZPG goals; it is mandatory that we now turn our attention to getting others to do so likewise. It is inimical to Whites to share this planet with low-IQ degenerates; we need to provide services for sterilizing females from these ever expanding population groups. I do disagree with PC however that slowing the rate of births among those who actually produce wealth is more important than reducing the birth rates of the degenerates. The West may consume far more resources than less efficient countries, but we also produce the world’s goods, science, medicine, and all the things that the degenerates—oops, indigenous peoples—yearn for. As soon as these people hit our shores, they will want to consume as much as us, but do so while on welfare. So they would consume only, and not produce. We must reduce the numbers of the incapable over the capable, increasing the number of people that can sustain the quality of the environment through innovation, not self-imposed deprivation.

The PC mission statement “condemns any use of force or violence. Population Connection condemns racism in all of its forms.” 100degenerates.com could live with this restriction—if necessary. The goal after all is to find the cheapest way to make the biggest impact. Within these guidelines, the mission would include concentrating resources on population groups that are very poor, people where their central government would either support or at least not interfere with a sterilization program, and in parts of the world where too many people puts pressure on the United States population explosion from Latin America.

We would also benefit from getting financial support from corporations such as those doing business say in Latin America in industries like timber, oil and gas, plantation farming, etc. Both central governments and the business community would benefit from reducing the number of poor people, and the poorer they are and the less educated, the easier it will be to get them to cooperate, while giving them money to better their lives—a most compassionate thing to do.

I do disagree with PCs position that: “immigration pressures on the U.S. population are best relieved by addressing factors which compel people to leave their homes and families and emigrate to the United States. Foremost among these are population growth, economic stagnation, environmental degradation, poverty, and political repression. We believe unless problems are successfully addressed in the developing nations of the world, no forcible exclusion policy will successfully prevent people from seeking to relocate into the United States.”

I really don’t care what poor people are seeking; I only care about what they are actually doing. With closed borders, and it is only our will that keeps us from closing them, the poor will have to stay home and be productive or starve. The same is true in much of Africa, population control takes over quite nicely when there is no more food to eat. So I wouldn’t waste 100degenerates money on Africa. In the Middle East, it seems to me that eventually warfare will take care of the population bomb problem quite efficiently. Of course, all of this depends on closing borders.

“Population Connection believes that U.S. immigration policies should focus on reunification of immediate families….” Right on! Let’s send the bastards back home to their families. Immigration control is actually quite easy. For example, a national ID with stiff penalties for anyone hiring an illegal would be a good start. Then I would enforce the “Safe Vehicles Act,” where cars have to be kept in near perfect condition, along with matching license plates to insurance companies’ records to make sure every vehicle is properly insured. Then I would eliminate public transportation subsidies, and make the underclass ride bikes if they couldn’t afford other means of transportation. Of course, we would have to pass legislation making bike riders responsible for not being killed or injured if hit by a car. This would go a long way in reducing air pollution and fuel consumption, as well as keeping undesirables out of the better neighborhoods.

Finally, PC states, “When women are seen exclusively or primarily as child-bearers, they are denied full recognition as human beings in their own right.” So by sterilizing women, they will be seen more as either productive workers or sex objects, or both, so 100degenerates.org would be improving women’s “full recognition as human beings…”

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, January 7, 2006 at 01:23 PM in Immigration
Comments (7) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Next entry: Gays are immoral, says top Muslim

Previous entry: Black damages US/Japan relations