A Labour of ... well, not hate exactly, but certainly scorn

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 11 October 2014 23:26.

Two views of the “modern” British Labour Party in all its current fear and confusion, the first from an email sent to me by Graham Lister:

Labour is killing itself - its root in working class solidarity is now just a tiny echo in its ideology/brand. This is the problem with Labourism in the UK in general. The original trade union movement and its nascent party was hijacked by socially left-leaning ‘progressive’ liberals which turned into a flood following the historic death of the old Liberals. Think the whole Fabian tradition. Liberal reformers that wish to ‘reform’ society for ‘the better’’ by the top-down efforts of ‘experts’ on behalf (and in the best interests naturally) of we plebs that sell our labour to make ends meet.

Of course, the genuine working class involvement kept the liberals semi ‘honest’ but the two sociological groups always had an uneasy relationship. The socially conservative but economically radical workers (think Red Clydeside, Durham miners etc) and the economically insipid but socially radical liberals/Fabians was always the mix of Labour.  But now that organic link to the working class is dead (and has been for some time), thus Labour has hollowed itself out to - at best - the Fabian liberals ‘managing’ technocratic reform for the ‘betterment’ of the ignorant masses. Thus, Labour membership is little more than social liberals, worried public sector workers/professionals, upper class careerists/professional politicos (Balls, Miliband et al - mostly privately educated, PPE Oxford graduates and ‘special advisors’) and ethnics on the make.  Interestingly the vast majority of Labour activists are based in London and the SE and from a middle class/upper middle-class background. Look at someone like Bob Crow and the tube workers - they walked away from Labour a number of years ago as they correctly noted it was a waste of their time and effort.

Labour doesn’t believe in very much at the top level other than staying on the gravy train - see here - and what it does believe is little more than the naive proposition that racism is the worse evil in human history and one ‘solves’ it by mixing all people into a grand ‘melting pot’. 1960’s crap. Plus identity politics for ‘worthy victims’ of liberal sympathies - ethnic minorities, gays and other sexual deviants (just google the topic of Harriet Harman’s pedo sympathies let alone Margaret Hodge’s outrageous conduct in charge of Islington council - all tip of the iceberg stuff as Rotherham suggests). Nothing much to do with any serious form of class politics. i.e. basically decent wages for workers.

Clearly for the cause of Scottish nationalism, Labour in Scotland must be politically destroyed - and it’s happening. They don’t like to give the figures for membership of the Labour party in Scotland but, at best, it’s around the 7,000-8,000 mark. The SNP is now approaching 80,000 members. Clearly the Union is a zombie - it’s dead or in its death throws yet still lives on for now.  Obviously, Labour are now becoming toxic in places like Glasgow and Dundee.  Equally obviously, a Scottish MP from a Scottish Westminster seat will increasingly be seen as a liability/unacceptable to English voters in any of the big Westminster cabinet positions (or as a UK wide leader of the Westminster ‘main’ parties). If one was a young and cynical but ambitious, would-be Scottish politician - with the sense to play the ‘long game’ - well such a person could only join the SNP.  The idea of a Labour party dominated and led by Scots (Smith, Blair - technically Scottish by birth and his father’s blood - Brown, Darling et al) and ruling the UK, will be a thing of the past. I cannot see English public opinion tolerating such a state of affairs again.

In England the situation is more complex - ALL three of the smug Westminster parties need, in effect, to be destroyed by an anti-establishment insurgency. Obviously, the liberal elites have all the serious money behind them, the propaganda of the mass media, etc.  But what can be taken away from them is their democratic legitimacy. Now in their hearts, no one at Westminster gives a damn about democracy or the plebs.  But by the rules of the game and ‘in public’ that (and what we think) matters enormously.  UKIP is indeed a crude mechanism but let’s hope for a pincer movement from both UKIP and the SNP in an anti-Westminster uprising.

It’s taken me a long time but I now hate the Labour party even more than I hate the Tory party.  And that’s a lot of hate.

The second offering is mine, and takes the form of a rather sympathetic (well, sort of sympathetic) piece of advice to party members and readers of LabourList, the party’s “biggest independent grassroots e-network”.  So called.  It was posted in the aftermath of the pretty disastrous by-election in Heywood & Middleton, which Labour held on a recount from a fearfully healthy and strong-looking UKIP.

Your problems include:

Rotherham, where Labour Party members, councillors, social workers, and police actually colluded to ignore young white girls forced into sexual slavery and prostitution. That was an act of complicity. Why is no one in the council or the police before the courts? A few reluctant resignations is nothing. Dust and carpets come to mind. And let’s not forget the other 50 English towns and cities where this is still going on.

Anti-racism, which created the fear and loathing that was running amok in Rotherham council, and in the police. Same for all the other towns and cities. You are still in thrall to this poison. It isn’t a moral crusade. It is a criminal conspiracy. You need to free yourself from it urgently.

Political correctness - a national joke that only brings down contempt upon the heads of its devotees.

The outrageous fact that you never troubled to ask the English people if we wanted a future of ethnic minoritisation in our own towns and cities. You never explained it to us. You just coerced us into it in 2001, and had the damned cheek to tell us we were morally illegitimate if we didn’t “celebrate” the fact. You proved right there to be traitors to your own class - there is no better word to describe it, I’m afraid. It is only due to the labours of SO15 that the BNP didn’t destroy you years ago, as the FN is destroying the Socialists in France today.

Multiculturalism - the political ethologist Frank Salter recently described it as a system in which government protection is extended to every minority but is withheld from the ethnic majority. It is a despicably unequal system - and has to be so because the native English have birthright and natural justice on their side, so there is no foundational equality to discover. Hardly surprising, then, that everyone agrees that multiculturalism has failed. But there is no functioning alternative in integration. The English won’t integrate with Africans and can’t integrate with Moslems. Why do you think there is White Flight?

You don’t represent the traditionally Labour-voting English working people. You talk about representing them but actually you despise them, as Brown despised Mrs Duffy - a rare moment of truthspeaking in a world of spin and lies.

The professional political class - policy wonks like Ed and affirmative action wimin will never endear themselves to the working man. The Westminster researcher syndrome and the Third Sector are strangling you. Do something about it.

Your profound identification with public services - you present yourselves as a party of inner city school teachers and public sector union organisers. It’s far too narrow and it warps your whole Weltanschauung.

The Establishment - you have become it, and it is extremely ugly, greedy and corrupt. The public have had more than enough of it, and increasingly intend to sweep it away. Be warned.

Islam - it isn’t the religion of peace. It isn’t compatible with Western democracy. It isn’t compatible with feminism. It isn’t compatible with any level of respect for homosexuals. You cannot have Islam and any of these within the same ideological space.

Of course, there are other things, a long list of them. You are in the most terrific bind. You have succeeded in dragging the English people to a place of fear and suffering, and you want to drag them further in the same ideological direction. There is now an alternative taking shape. It is anti-Establishment and anti-political. You could use that energy to reform yourself - we saw something much narrower but still related in the Occupy movement. But you won’t, will you?



Comments:


1

Posted by Jonathan Portes on Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:35 | #

I just have to laugh whenever I hear Labour politicians claim that UKIP is anti working class and that the workers are damned fools for voting for them.
Wasn’t it that despicable paedophile/shirt lifter Peter Mandelson who bragged that New Labour was ‘seriously relaxed about people becoming absolutely filthy rich’? Wasn’t it New Labour who unleashed the most enormous increase in job competition, with their uncontrolled immigration, that has lead to the biggest wage compression ever experienced in British economic history?
Wasn’t it New Labour who preserved right up to the end the Thatcherite dual income tax bands?

And isn’t it UKIP who want to get the low paid out of income tax altogether?


2

Posted by Morgoth on Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:37 | #

I’m amazed that Labour are so stupid as to put the alien looking and genuinely weird Jew Ed Miliband ahead for the position of PM. Not only that but he is Pro Israel and comes from a Marxist family. If Labour win we will be able to crack the JQ wide open in the UK.

Jonathan, the Left seem to believe that by creating a Multicultural society ‘‘humanity’’ can team up and beat the evil multi-nationals. Just like the New Age movement which is being absorbed into the Nationalist Movement (Red Ice Productions, Daily Stormer assault on Alex Jones ) they believe we can beat the New World Order Globalist agenda by doing everything they want us to do. This is or course utterly moronic.


3

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 13 Oct 2014 07:10 | #

If it hadn’t been Ed it would have been David.  Ed only got it because he was the Unite candidate (or, if it wasn’t Unite , some other globulous, constipated, big mouth, small-brained trade union.  I forget which.  They are all the same).

The assumption seems to be that when reality catches up with Ed, and he gets himself demoted to Shadow Minister for Bus Passes, or possibly Bacon, Labour’s new shoe-in for disappointment will be that great ladykiller and editor of wiki pages, the “good-looking”, media-hungry Chuka Omana ... Umamoo ... Um…  that black bloke from Streatham.  You know, the British Barry, the last great hope for a post-racial future, the man from the Ministry of Kool.  How English voters will love to finally cut their throats with a cross on the ballot paper next to his completely unmemorable name.

“And tell me, who is the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland?”

Long pause.

“Erm ... ah ... Chuckie ... erm ... Chocker ... Chicken ...”


4

Posted by Morgoth on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:03 | #

Spear Chuka has been whining about UKIP not being nice to certain sections of society:

http://www.dailystormer.com/obama-wannabee-brands-ukip-racist-in-desperate-bid-to-gain-support-for-labour/

Chuka has a right to complain because as a friend recently informed me the popular slang term site Urban Dictionary has recently been up dating its content and has now included Chuka’s mother

‘‘Mudshark’’

‘‘A white woman that dates black men, usually because of low self-esteem.

After being beaten up and turned-out again by Rufus, Cindy realized there is a down side to being a mudshark.’‘

And Chuka, as the product of such a coupling, gets it too, he being now known as a ‘‘Mudskipper’’ (LOL)

‘’ The baby of a mud shark. Name originates from the female being a mudshark, having one of many kids (usually from differant sharks) and the male skipping town when he finds out the fat white chick he impulsively banged is having a baby.

The mudshark gave birth to a mudskipper.’‘

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mudskipper


5

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:58 | #

Looking ahead, then, to the inevitable leadership contest once our hero, as PM, has been exposed as a failure and a fraud, and the electorate are deserting in droves, we can look forward to the popular rallying cry “Chuck the skipper overboard”.


6

Posted by Mick Lately on Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:08 | #

Recently saw a TV advertisement for Spain’s best-run bank Santander which featured a black man and a white woman as one of the couples seeking some debt treacle.

Not surprising when one considers the influence Jews have in banking and advertising and that they promote race-mixing between Gentile whites and blacks.

It’s a matter of putting two and two together but seems to be beyond most people.

Actually, I’m worried for Spain, no signs of any resistance there at all, no protest votes for the “far right” - or for the “far left”, for that matter - and no summer riots of unemployed, young, indigenous Spaniards.

And Chuka’s face is a bland beacon that’s as unmemorable as his name. I can easily imagine English women pretending to find him attractive as a form of status signalling in the presence of their peers.


7

Posted by mike on Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:46 | #

In the elections In New Zealand, the NZ Labour Party took a somewhat populist direction, campaigning on issues such as housing affordabilty, restricting sales of land to foreigners, restricting the expansion of seasonal guest worker schemes and keeping down GST.

Sadly, it got hammered and suffered its worst election defeat since WWII.

You have to wonder if certain globalist interests might have played a part in such a sweeping defeat.


8

Posted by voznich on Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:58 | #

You have to wonder if certain globalist interests might have played a part in such a sweeping defeat.

Such interests always play a part. But unless we think that there is elite-instigated voter fraud, as there was in the old USSR and any number of Third World dictatorships, what could such globalist interests actually do that could be considered sinister? If not stuffing ballot boxes (or manipulating voter software), what’s the problem? That they poured a bunch of money into anti-populist advertising? And who’s really to blame, the elitists or the white sheeple morons led around by them?


9

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:41 | #

The New Zealand Prime Minister, John Keys is a Jew.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Black Lies in White Nationalism: Hitler didn’t instigate war, modestly sought appropriated territory
Previous entry: Ebola remiss an alarm for border control as even most objective standards of human ecology ignored

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:20. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:54. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:47. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:19. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:04. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:35. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:44. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:48. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:17. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25. (View)

affection-tone