A train journey through the geopolitics of Al Qaeda.  Or make that liberalism.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 11 July 2005 13:41.

I don’t often travel to London these days.  I can’t feel the same for the place as I did in my childhood.  But it happened that last Thursday I was required to catch the 8.20 from Lewes to Victoria.  The previous evening a Portugeuse client had flown in to London to meet with me next day at 10.00am in a Bayswater hotel.  These guys pay the piper.  So a trip to town could not be avoided.

Actually, it was a pleasant enough journey - quiet carriage, no twenty stone slab of lard sitting next to me.  The rush hour was mostly past.  The train didn’t fill until it reached multicultural East Croydon.  It got in to Victoria shortly before 9.30am.

The next two hours of my life were spent going nowhere very fast and being dragged to the inevitable conclusion that my Portugeuse client would have to lunch alone.  I learned from the station tannoy that the Underground was closed due to “incidents”.  Other travellers, no less frustrated than I, had come into possession of the knowledge that somewhere a bus had been bombed.  Then the tannoy confirmed it.  Bus services were also suspended.  Outside the station, London’s amazingly ubiquitous black cabs had become as rare as hens’ teeth.  My mobile phone did not function.  I assumed that weight of call traffic was the cause (only later did I learn that the system was switched off for fear of remote detonation of terrorist bombs).

It was time to get out of town.

Back in the station more and more outbound trains were logged on the main display board as “Delayed”.  My next train home – the 11.47 - was one of them.  A Brighton-bound train was about to leave.  I ran for it and stepped thankfully into the second carriage from the back.

I took a seat, and the train rolled almost noiselessly out of the station.  Travel in and out of London is a thing of surpassing ordinariness and, although we all knew this could not be an ordinary day in the life of Londoners, nonetheless in that carriage there was an atmosphere of ineffably unremarkable routine.

After a few moments, however, a youngish, scarcely European male walked through from the rear carriageway and stood by the door, next to another male passenger.  Almost immediately the non-Euro struck up a conversation with the other man.  He was talkative, in fact unnervingly effusive.  His eyes were shining with happiness for no reason that I could comprehend.  His accent was French … a French Moslem, a Berber perhaps or a half-Tunisian?  Anyhow, he had a back-pack.

I looked around at my fellow passengers.  They were all engrossed in their own thoughts and conversations.  No one had noticed him.  But I had and I decided to be perfectly mean-spirited and put some distance between me and that pack on his back.

Three or four carriages further on I found a sweetly agreeable “English” environment and took a seat.  Opposite me, divided from me by a white table, was a small, casually dressed man of my age, I would say.  He was speaking on his mobile phone.  I tried mine.  Still dead, mysteriously.  I commented on it, half hoping he might let me use his phone to call home, but no.  He said something I don’t now recall and we started to talk about our frustrated travelling plans.  Like me he had started out from Lewes that morning but got no further than Victoria.  Like me he had grabbed a ride on this train in case it was the only one heading out of Victoria in roughly the right direction.

My companion was plainly an educated man, middle-class, my age and balding like me but possessed of a much more impressive cranium.  I could quite see him delivering excruciatingly dull lectures on psychology at Sussex University.  Certainly they would be dull because he was a tight and cautious little fellow, not at all noisy and expansive as I confess I am sometimes too prone to be.  Still, I didn’t want us to be best buddies.  Our conversation, limping somewhat, moved on to the (largely rumoured) events of the morning.

“This sort of thing,” I said, “certainly concentrates the mind.”  And I told him of the young Arab with a back-pack and my very easily-taken decision to move carriages.”  I expected him to say something like, “Don’t blame you.  I’d have done exactly the same.”  But he didn’t.  “You have absolutely no reason to go about being paranoid,” he said baldly.

There was such an unmistakable distance and disdain in his voice, I was slightly taken aback.  It was as though he had discovered dog-shit on his favourite slippers.  He had fully intended to scold me, and felt no compunction in doing so.  Obviously, I had offended against his moral code - probably twice, having not only rejected Back-Pack Guy on racial grounds but committed the unpardonable crime of inviting his approval of it.  Well, I simply don’t make an obedient moral inferior to leftist academics.  Fuck you pal, I thought.  I know you now.

I said sweetly, “If paranoia keeps you alive it seems eminently reasonable to me,”

“What did you say?” he replied, as if no one could possibly defend racism on the grounds of not wishing to be blown up.  I turned my thought-crime into a question.  He didn’t answer.  I don’t think he even looked at me.  He turned his attention to his document case and fished out a substantial paperback.  It was Donna Tartt’s “The Little Friend”.  Perhaps he imagined he had found himself sitting opposite a real-life racist of the Old South.  What a pity, then, he didn’t extend me the opportunity to fully confirm his suspicions.

I don’t suppose he gave a second thought to his encounter with a low and boorishly unintellectual example of white cultural recidivism.  But I find that little episodes like this are frequently more instructive than great events, even one as great as the London bombings.  I have been thinking on it.

At Gleneagles on the day of the attacks Our Great Leader said:-

It is important, however, that those engaged in terrorism realise that our determination to defend our values and our way of life is greater than their determination to cause death and destruction to innocent people in a desire to impose extremism on the world. Whatever they do, it is our determination that they will never succeed in destroying what we hold dear in this country, and in other civilised nations throughout the world.

It is quite amazing to me how many folk, great and small, leap to the conclusion that “our values and our way of life” and “what we hold dear” are under attack.  I hold my Englishness and my European cultural heritage dear.  So far as I know, Islamic fundamentalism isn’t remotely interested in either.  The fate laid in store by Allah the Great, Allah the Merciful for an irredeemably English infidel like me is one of submission or pain and death.  It says so in that squiggly writing of theirs.  That is all fundamentalists need to know.

Scarcely more accurate than Blair, last Friday’s Telegraph leader informed us as follows:-

The bombers’ intention is to weaken Western support for moderate Muslim governments in Asia and to radicalise domestic opinion, whether through heightened Islamophobia or drastic curtailment of civil liberties.

It is really very depressing to see presumably intelligent, thoughtful and well-informed people parade such a limited, Euro-centric understanding.  Alright, there is Iraq.  Iraq has changed the language.  Iraq does beg the sort of question that Blair and the Telegraph leader writer attempt to answer.  We are, after all, America’s reliable ally – as was Spain at the time of the Madrid bombings.  And, in fact, not just Spain and Britain but all the twenty-three nations that have helped in the neocon War, reliable or not, have been “punished” in some cruel and disgusting way.  I see how Western journalists and policy-makers might conclude that “it’s all about Iraq” or even “it’s all about us”.  But they are completely, profoundly wrong.

The function of Islamic terrorism is not to attack us per se.  The blood on the tracks is but a vehicle.  The true function of Islamic terrorism is to unite the Ummah, the nation of the believers, behind the drive to purify Islamic lands of all Western influence and of the associated corruptions of the local ruling elite.

In a curious way that ought to ring a few bells with the radical right in Western politics since.  If it is worthy of its name, it will want the great process of race-replacement reversed in the West and the corruption of cultural Marxism expunged.  We ought to be believers in difference and in national sovereignty, others as well as our own.  If Moslem fanatics want to radicalise the Ummah that is their right.  We ought to be unconcerned except to ensure that, firstly, the Ummah does not extend to our lands and, secondly, we can do business with whoever emerges the victor in the oil-producing areas of the Middle East.  Beyond that we have no pressing interest in the matter.  Israel is not a pressing interest.

As it is, the radical right is precluded from influence.  In America, a Jewish-globalist movement has seized the Republican helm.  Bush’s criminal, Israel-first strategy of implanting liberal democracy in the Islamic world is precisely what Al Qaeda sought from the West when it slammed those aircraft into the twin towers.  The more clumsy and heavy-handed the response the better, because the Ummah is watching intently and will be swift to draw its conclusions.

Britons, especially, should have understood this at once.  For many long, bloody years we grieved the lives lost to Sinn Fein/IRA atrocities.  We buried the dead, repaired and rebuilt the damaged masonry and we wondered how the Catholics of Northern Ireland could lend their support to such base inhumanity.  But they did, that’s the thing.  Sinn Fein/IRA understood and relied upon this all along.  A “spectacular” equated directly to a heightening of support.  The leadership drew its strength and determination to continue “blattering away” at the hated Brits wholly from this.  And today, for all its continuing murderous thuggery and blatant duplicity on arms, it is the main party of opposition in Northern Ireland (or the north of the island of Ireland, as they insist on calling it).  Terrorist violence works, especially in a racially sundered OMOV democracy, because it forces the issue of loyalty.  When put to the test in this way, faith and blood are always stronger loyalties than liberal political inclinations or faux-humanitarianism.  Sinn Fein/IRA proved it.  Al Qaeda is in the process of proving it.

So where does that leave us?  Well, obviously, with a leader and with elites who, even as the bombs explode, espouse a subtle anti-racism (ie, racism against whites) and not so subtly embrace “moderate British Muslims”.  Never mind its famously bloody borders, Islam is being commended to us yet again as this denatured thing, the religion of peace.  But Islam is Abrahamic and, therefore, basically a vehicle for the ethnic struggles of the peoples of Arabia, the Indian sub-continent, South-East Asia, and North and West Africa.  It is a cultural artefact of the people who created it and I am unconvinced that it and they are essentially, indisputably peaceful.  It is as its scripture describes it, and that is not necessarily as these “moderate” (and, of course, “British”) clerics and our own liberal elites would have us believe.  The each have their own agenda, after all.  To isolate fundamentalism they must neutralise the appeal of Al Qaeda.  For, if they cannot succeed in that, the Islam of the fundamentalists will propagate and eventually sweep away both their dominions.

So when Blair speaks of “our” precious CP values rather than our blood and our kinship, and the determination not to forfeit “our” way of life rather than the English way of life, he is not being entirely dishonest.  He is talking about the MultiCult, protecting the MultiCult, keeping us enslaved to the MultiCult.  He is exhibiting precisely the defensiveness of my interlocutor on the Brighton train, albeit carefully packaged for public consumption.  Nobody must cognise racial difference nor, of course, a different racial motivation.  That would be paranoid, racist, boorish and all the other sins fingered under those strangely violent emotions liberals suffer when confronted by a white person’s love of kind.

Our train did not reach Brighton.  The conductor announced that a suspect package had been found at the terminus, and until it could be dealt with we must be held at Hassocks station.  Finally, my phone had a connection and I could ring home.  My wife answered and, yes, she would drive to Hassocks right away.

In a last gesture of goodwill I broke the silence and offered my little liberal friend a lift to Lewes.  He declined.  He would wait, he said, until the train arrived in Brighton and then catch another to Lewes from there.  I didn’t try persuasion.  I would like to think he’s still there, a moral suicide bomber targeting the racist English so as to drive them into the arms of the MultiCult.

Now, isn’t that a thing?  Of course, the eponymous liberal would think that Al Qaeda is trying to bomb him into facing Mecca five times a day.  That’s his own methodology with us and the MultiCult.

Blair’s right.  It doesn’t work.



Comments:


1

Posted by Geoff Beck on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:26 | #

Making contact with another atomized white person is very difficult. I still try, often subtly as you did on the train.

Do you remember in 1984 when Winston Smith would catch the eyes of another person - just briefly - and those eyes would seem to be say “this is all a bunch of lies.” Then contact would be broken, quickly.

Such efforts at contact are similar. Anyway, you stood your ground and used your God given rights to say your mind. Perhaps a seed has been planted in your conversation partner. Perhaps he knows of someone not in alignment with the state religion of multiculti. May he find a way out in the future.


2

Posted by Kubilai on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:33 | #

The brainwashing runs deep gents.  I was speaking with an Englishman, in his 50s, last week.  We discussed the bombings in London, and he being from if I remember correctly Manchester though living here for a good 2 decades.  I said straight out that “we need to ship ALL of them straight home” and though he agreed with the state of affairs afflicting the west responded “well we need to be tolerant”.  In other words he is still trying to separate the “good” Muslims from the “bad” ones.  I told him we have been more than tolerant and this is are repayment.  We also cannot rely on the “moderate” Muslims because they, if they truly exist, have no voice in Islam.  Only the nutbars do.  I stood my ground though he was not as dispicable as the passenger with GW.

This is a slippery slope, though I feel it needs to be attempted.  I think “contact” needs to be initiated even though it is still a risky proposition for us.  We’ll run into the Liberal nutjobs from time to time, though the chances of running into sympathetic ears is high and will only get higher as time marches on.


3

Posted by Michael on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:11 | #

“This sort of thing,” I said, “certainly concentrates the mind.” And I told him of the young Arab with a back-pack and my very easily-taken decision to move carriages.”


Arabs have a very small prescence in teh UK.

this weekend the papers have been full of reports of the bombers being European albeit ones of the Islamic Kosovan variety.  The ones who are the problem will not be wearing traditional Islamic clobber, they will not be noticeable, they will be blending into the crowd in the areas full of Eastern Europeans.

So perhaps that other bloke has a point.


4

Posted by Kubilai on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:19 | #

So perhaps that other bloke has a point.

So perhaps I do as well.  Ship them ALL back home.  Let’s not play favorites and unwittingly trample on sensitive feelings.  Eh?


5

Posted by Kubilai on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:24 | #

As to the Islamic Kosovans, weren’t they the poor peaceniks that the evil Milosevic tried to “ethnically cleanse”?  Alright, which evil Brit is trying to “cleanse” them now.  LOL


6

Posted by Phil on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:27 | #

David,

An eloquent post.

I was talking to a German friend about this today. And he hit on something. The reason Al Qaeda is scaring the living daylights out of our politicians is not merely because it threatens lives (immigrants generally threaten lives - not many have kept count of the murders in London since the blacks arrived), terrorism threatens the very basis of the Multi-cult.

In the long term, if we are right, multi-cultism will fail. Its foundations are based on lies. What sustains it is relative peace and security - both of which are rapidly disappearing before our very eyes due to the types of people the ideology imports.


7

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:29 | #

Michael,

The guy with the French accent was a very personable, no doubt bright and educated young man dressed in the kind of clothing any student might wear.  There are thousands like him in London.  But why would I give any of them the benefit of the doubt?

I don’t.  In my homeland I perceive them as aliens with competing genetic interests and, most assuredly, competing cultural and political interests. For me, the bombings add another layer of discriminative potential, albeit a decisive one because they trigger the reaction I should have had from the first - out-of-hand avoidance and rejection.

That’s why the little leftist intellectual on the train south disparaged me.  It isn’t the practical application of racism on a day of Moslem bombings that offended him.  That was only judicious.  It was the political import of what I did - the rejection of multiculturalism - which made him disdain me.

If you think he had a point all well and good.  I think he is a race-traitor.


8

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:39 | #

Phil,

You and your German friend have alighted on the meaning of the post.  The unappealing conclusion one must draw is that these murderous Moslem scum who bomb us are creating conditions more amenable to our eventual success and survival.  It is an extraordinarily bitter irony and decidedly not help one would seek.  But it is there anyway and there’s not a thing we can do about that.


9

Posted by Phil on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:52 | #

Indeed.

In the same vein that Churchill would not have wished the deaths of 7 million Ukrainians or millions of Chinese peasants to prove that communism was a monstrosity.

But those events happened anyway because the ideology took hold. It would have saddened Churchill and all of the other ferocious anti-Communists to see those deaths. But those deaths vindicated them.

As the saying goes:

Deal with reality now, or reality will deal with you.


10

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:27 | #

In other words he is still trying to separate the “good” Muslims from the “bad” ones.

Science tells us that a fundamental purpose of organized religion is to fuse “individual” humans into an inseparable mass that itself constitutes an organism at a higher level of complexity.

David Sloan Wilson:

Natural selection is a multilevel process that operates among groups in addition to among individuals within groups. Any unit becomes endowed with the properties inherent in the word organism to the degree that it is a unit of selection. The history of life on earth has been marked by many transitions from groups of organisms to groups as organisms. Organismic groups achieve their unity with mechanisms that suppress selection within groups…. Human evolution falls within the paradigm of multilevel selection and the major transitions of life. Moral systems provide many of the mechanisms that enable human groups to function as adaptive units.


11

Posted by Geoff Beck on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57 | #

Headline: Sky News correspondent Martin Brunt said it is thought the men were British.


12

Posted by Geoff Beck on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:28 | #

“I cannot feel for you ... because I believe you are an infidel,” he added.

“I acted out of conviction—not because I hated your son.”

Suspect in Dutch filmmaker’s murder makes dramatic court room confession

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200507/s1412885.htm


13

Posted by Phil on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:44 | #

The first suicide bombing on British soil.

It won’t be the last as the enemy is well within the gates and is being fed and coddled by our masters with their keen interest in preserving “diversity”.


14

Posted by john rackell on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:27 | #

GW, the thought occurred to me, after googling the name of a respondent on the JJR post about Oz fertility, that your ‘English’ liberal could have been an Islamic convert. Even normal balding almost-English types can get turned. They may be hard to spot if they don’t advertise.


15

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:43 | #

John,

I didn’t mention it in the post because I didn’t want my description of this individual to slip into caricature, but ... when he pulled out the paperback from his document case he first produced a section of the Guardian and laid it on the table.  No question in my mind that the guy was a twenty-two carat lefty.


16

Posted by Stuka on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:53 | #

A typical Guardian reader then. ‘Nuff said, mate. smile



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Anguish, shock and horror from big British Moslems.  But lasting shame?
Previous entry: Seven Seven

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:15. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:02. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

affection-tone