Acts of War

Posted by Guest Blogger on Saturday, 22 January 2011 02:34.

by David Hamilton

Acts of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the present incidence of Muslims raping young white girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogenous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.

Can anyone imagine the great Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850, for the assault on British subject Don Pacifico in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of Palmerston’s declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power.

Lord Palmerston addressing the Commons

This was the famous, five-hour speech Civis Britannicus, in which he delivered himself of this sentiment:

“As the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say, Civis Romanus sum, so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England will protect him from injustice and wrong.”

The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment! The sight of the elites on the BBC’s Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening. They:

(1) unanimously agreed Jack Straw was a racist for hinting that Pakistani males are serial sex offenders against young white girls, and would not even discuss the reality;

(2) didn’t mention that Pakistani women must be virgins at marriage and risk assault or death if they step out of line.

Michael Gove was a prig, and the ultra-orthodox Jeanette Winterson of course made her feminist points. She is a “hater” - but only of fashionable targets like white males. I suggest you read her books to see what she thinks of men. Are these vile liars and cowards our representatives? Do they speak for us? No, we must protect our people ourselves and campaign to protect young white girls from the alliance of secrecy between the degenerate elites and Muslim child-rapists. When does the fight back start to protect our people - Now!

Events that might cause us to revolt are kept quiet at first. But if the truth comes out they try to nullify its effects. This is why Muslim child-rapists are classed as criminals. We must be encouraged to think they are the same as white paedophiles. But they are from a different community and never do it to their own, only other communities children like whites and Sikhs.

The police and social services kept these activities quiet for years and even tried to sue Channel 4 to stop them exposing it. The late Colin Cramphorn, CBE, QPM, DL, FRSA, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, told a public meeting that we must “learn to live” with the rapes of young white children. Instead of doing their duty to combat crime the local police forces aided and abetted these evil crimes by
covering them up.

Cramphorn none too gently persuaded Channel 4 to postpone its investigation Edge of the City as it would “increase community tensions” in the run up to local and European elections in 2004. He didn’t do that because there was no charge to answer:

More than a year in the making, Edge of the City follows social workers with difficult cases in one inner city.

The most controversial of these witnesses authorities and parents trying to stop groups of young men who are grooming girls as young as 11 for sex.

Although none of the officials in the film raise race as the issue in these predatory relationships, the filmmakers make it perfectly clear that the abusers are predominantly Asian, and all of the abused girls are white.

This is the controversy at the heart of the film which cries out for explanation. But instead, the story is shoe-horned into 90 minutes, along with those of an elderly man fighting for independence, a troubled couple dealing with disability and alcoholism and a trainee social worker’s determination to help a serial teenager offender.

The recent, belated expose of the extent of Muslims gang-raping young white girls has at last brought this evil into the public consciousness. Progressives are trying to remove its sting: nullify it by adapting it to their unworldly ideology. If they do not Whites would start to revolt and there are a lot more of us. Its only by controlling what people are allowed to know that keeps the masses passive; even welfare entitlements and employing a large per cent of the population could lose their force if people knew it was a rival ethnic community that is raping young children. Some recalcitrant facts could not be swayed away and remain: The Times investigation is based around 56 men convicted in the Midlands and north of England since 1997, 50 from Muslim backgrounds. Muslim men even hang around outside school gates looking for young White girls to drug and rape, but no teacher speaks out.

Former Labour MP Ann Cryer provoked an attempt to hide the truth in 2003 when she said the traditional culture of arranged marriages could have caused a criminal minority of Asian men to target vulnerable young white girls for sex. No, but the gang-raping of minors is criminal and the police and social services aided and abetted these predators by covering up.

Another attempt to falsify reality came from Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Lancashire-based Ramadhan Foundation, said last year:

“I think the police are overcautious because they are afraid of being branded racist. These men are criminals and should be treated as criminals - whatever their race.”

This is the same excuse the Government used for IRA terrorists. That those political terrorists were criminals. We really must not take any notice of this cowardly twaddle.

In the Netherlands young white girls are gang-raped and used for prostitution by Moroccan pimps, known as ‘loverboys’. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe – well, the Muslim parts are.

To sample the official “conspiracy of silence” that allows hundreds of vulnerable white girls in some towns to be abused by Asian men: Ajmal Mohamed, a 43-year-old from Blackburn. In 2004, Mohammed, took a schoolgirl to a Manchester hotel room and got her drunk to celebrate her 14th birthday. The child ran away. Police were called, but he denied having sex with her and they issued him with a “child abduction warning letter”. They allowed it to continue. He was never prosecuted.

Two years later, Mohammed took another 14-year-old to a hotel room in Blackpool and did rape this one. When the police arrested him they found the phone numbers of six other vulnerable young girls on his mobile phone. The police who let him off the first time have personal responsibility for the second attack and must be held accountable.

In industrial towns across the North and the Midlands, in just three years 51 people have been convicted in trials involving groups of men who have picked up young girls for gang-raping and sexual exploitation. Forty-eight of the offenders were Asian; the vast majority of the victims were white. Recently, in Derby, nine men, eight of them Asian, were sentenced for their parts in a gang that groomed, sexually exploited and in some cases raped 27 local children, 22 of them white.

In 2006, Blackburn’s local paper, the Lancashire Telegraph, launched a “Keep Them Safe” campaign to make the authorities tackle what it called “sexual grooming and abduction - which predominantly involves Asian men”. In article after article, the paper charted locals’ frustration at officials refusal to do what they are paid for and help the girls. In 2007, the Lancashire Telegraph reported, that some parents had threatened to sue the police for their failure to act. The editor, Kevin Young, said: “This is an extremely sensitive subject, and the Telegraph gave it a lot of consideration before launching its campaign.” They should sue the police for covering the widespread rape of children up.

Like the liars on QT the judiciary takes the side of foreign sex attackers. In October 2007 evil Judge Sir Henry Hodge stopped the deportation of a serial sex attacker because it would breach his human right to a family life. Hodge was an immigration judge busy trying to destroy our country. The foreigner admitted indecently assaulting 11 women in the previous five years and has committed a string of other offences including robbery, burglary, arson and drugs.

Hodge, who was the husband of the one-time paedophile-embroiled Labour politician and former minister Margaret Hodge, ruled he should be allowed to stay because he came to the UK at the age of six and has almost no family left in West Africa. To support his decision, he cited article eight of the Human Rights Act, which gives a person the right to a family life. Thats it! Family life for vile perverts but ruined lives for the victims and no legal catharsis offered.

Another evil judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam:

You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

It is true that white paedophiles travel to Thailand to practise their perversion. These are crimes against a different ethnic group, the “other”. Thailand is degenerate for allowing its children to be degraded, and the perverted whites who go there to abuse children must be punished as severely as the Muslims who do it here must.

It is true, too, that Catholic priests abused children and the Catholic authorities covered it up.

But the Muslim issue is different. The abuse is to white girls and the responsible authorities whom the white majority vote for and pay for cover it up. These girls are being raped and then groomed for prostitution. To Muslims whites are less than human. They dehumanise us with terms like Kuffar and Infidel. They hook young white girls on drugs and alcohol, and emotionally torture them. This is not about sex. If they wanted sex they could buy the services of prostitutes. They are easy to find. They advertise. Why, instead, do these Muslims use drugs, alcohol and mental degradation on those girls and pass them around like pieces of meat? Is it using our young women as the spoils of war. The deliberate degredation of non-Muslims, unbelievers, infidels? To emphasise the power, the supremacy, of Islam?

Anybody who has looked into the eyes of someone howling with pain at sexual abuse they suffered as a child knows what wicked and despicable people are the scum on Question Time, and the judiciary and the police for covering the crime up. What is clear is that our civilisation is being dragged down to the level of a savage Third World hell-hole. Muslims have no place in Europe and must be deported. The authorities are terrified of us revolting and yet they are making it inevitable by their appeasement of the perpetrators of these Acts of War.

This article is an edited version of the original at Sarah Maid of Albion blog.

Tags: Islam & Islamification

Comments:

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:17 | #

According to James Bacque in his Crimes and Mercies the number of Germans who died needlessly at the hands of the “Allies” is as follows:

TOTALS OF DEATHS

Minimum Maximum

Expellees (1945-50) 2,100,000 6,000,000
Prisoners (1941-50) 1,500,000 2,000,000
Residents (1946-50) 5,700,000 5,700,000
_________ __________

Totals 9,300,000 13,700,000

This must have been what motivated Ray Goodwin, when interviewed by Carolyn Yeager at Voice of Reason, to say with regard to post-war hardships suffered by the English, “To hell with those people. The real suffering was in Germany.”

This begs the following questions: Is the assertion that “Krauts” collectively “debased” themselves an attempt to rationalize away and implicitly justify the unimaginable suffering Germans experienced post-war? Could any moralism which does as such not be better described as naked sociopathy?

Posted by More Questions on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:58 | #

Instead of formulating the indifference and moral satisfaction a disconcerting number of individuals of the English middle-class apparently derive from seeing their working-class co-ethnics being increasingly dispossessed, impoverished and brutalized by non-English immigrants as “Catholic”-like authoritarianism would it not be more apt to describe said as moralism that is in effect sociopathic? Is engaging in such formulations a self-deceived attempt to shift blame away from “the English” and onto “Krauts” and “Catholics”? If it is not self-deceived, but conscious and intentional, then could it not be appropriately characterized as sociopathic? If “Krauts” can be held to be collectively guilty then cannot “the English” also be held to be collectively guilty? Have “the English” by dint of the actions of their ethny-betraying middle class “debased” themselves in a way they can never fully overcome? Does a nigger have nappy hair?

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:03 | #

We must not forget, also, how those evil Nazis treated the RAF pilots :

http://www.warandgame.info/2010/09/british-pilots-relied-on-german-sea.html

Posted by Wild Bill on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:31 | #

They should sue the police for covering the widespread rape of children up.

What else could the parents do in the greatest democracy of all time?

Posted by Wandrin on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:54 | #

Captain Tampax, More Questions

Neither of you are interested in live Germans/Americans or live Irish/Americans.

You don’t have to care about English children being hurt. This information could be used politically in any white country to aid the survival of people you do care about. But that’s the fundamental problem. You don’t care about anybody.

Posted by Buzz's on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:34 | #

Wandrin,

Thank you for drawing that to our attention. It is why the information was gathered and disseminated: To help develop an argument to use to rescue these young girls who British elites have abandoned to gang rapes from vile Muslims.

Posted by Frank on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:57 | #

It wasn’t only the British killing Germans.

I think CC’s post is valuable as a defence against the Holocaust albatross which will have Germany exterminated if not thrown off.

When someone says, “6 million Jews”; say “12 million Germans”. And remind of the 6 million Jews from WWI (one wonders just how many of these 6 million claims there are).

Posted by Frank on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:02 | #

This is a good piece, but I wish it were possible to make a pro-English anti-alien appeal rather than one to the British Empire and opposed to Muslims only.

Hopefully y’all will be able to channel anti-Muslim energy into pro-English energy.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:07 | #

Totally right, Frank. Moslems are wonderfully unlovely and conveniently distinctive in the public mind. But they are the tool and not the enemy. At least, they are not today. However, their demographic expansion, when allied to Islam’s expansionist character and fanaticism, makes possible one unique circumstance sometime, by my estimation, between 2030 and 2035 (though this video plumps for 2029):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THrltK9cGo8

Posted by Goethe on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:44 | #

It’s always disturbing to see these stories of passive Britons being abused by immigrants. It’s obviously a result of their freakish submission to governmental authority. The leniency of police and the inability to own weapons for self-defense doesn’t help, either.

Posted by Buzz's on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:45 | #

Frank,

It is not meant to appeal to the Empire. The comparison with Palmerston was to show how inadequate and effiminate modern British rulers are. To cover up for aliens mass raping young British girls is one of the most despicable things in modern history and cries out for justice.

effeminate [??f?m?n?t]
adj
1. (of a man or boy) displaying characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; not manly
2. lacking firmness or vigour an effeminate piece of writing

Posted by Buzz's on Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:51 | #

It was a comparison with this fairy Gove and to show that Palmerston would have dealt with it not pretend it was not happening like this scum -

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00xmvd9#p00d8t4b

Posted by Desmond Jones on Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:43 | #

Could any moralism which does as such not be better described as naked sociopathy?

State racism is both murderous and suicidal. Otherwise it cannot justify taking life. A sovereign English king ruled via threat of death, “take life or let live”. If modernity shifts that paradigm to a policy of ” ‘make’ live and ‘let’ die”, then how does it, the state, justify acts of war? The murder is justified by suicide in a ritual of moral purification. The Anglosphere justifies the murder of Germans with the genocide of its own abnormal. Just as the Nazis did.

Posted by Wandrin on Sun, 23 Jan 2011 08:48 | #

If “Krauts” can be held to be collectively guilty then cannot “the English” also be held to be collectively guilty? Have “the English” by dint of the actions of their ethny-betraying middle class “debased” themselves in a way they can never fully overcome? Does a nigger have nappy hair?

I can quarantee you the exact same thing is happening in Germany on the same scale. It will also be happening in those parts of America where separate ethnic enclaves of the same groups have been established. It will be just starting in Ireland.

95% of the middle-class in all those countries will be entirely unaware of what is happening because it’s been successfully insulated from the news. The 5% that do know are those who man the middle-class institutional interface with children like these in poor areas. Those people are almost entirely liberal-left.

But the people who care so much about dead Germans/Americans/Irish seem oddly unconcerned with live ones.

Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:13 | #

At least discussing war is more real and thus useful than metaphysics. Here is yet another disaster of multiculturalism, and the denial of the Race Principle:

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/01/engineer_jailed.php

Western defense agencies must hire nonwhites - and give them access to vital state secrets. Predictably, we know who is really loyal to white nations, and who is out for themselves only.

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:11 | #

“Predictably” should read ‘It may be predicted that”

“Who is out for themselves only” should read ... - Oh , it matters not. The illiteracies of Leon Haller will keep the educated readers amused until his long -heralded valedictory post.

The real point is that democracy is fine as long as one accepts that, in the US, too many White voters believe in the Semitic Supernatural and spring to the defence of that race which provided the Biblical Fairytales’ authors. This knee -jerk,cultural perversion’s adherents will be of no help in White racial preservation.

Posted by Leon Haller on Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:16 | #

Predictably, Al Ross makes a fool of himself yet again. Care to comment or correct, Mr. Site Administrator?

I admit I should have written “who are out for themselves”, though I was thinking of “who” as a noun substitute for entire ethnic groups, considered, however, as singular entities (ie, “the white man” v. “the Chinaman” or “the Muslim”, etc). Perhaps I should have written “who is out for himself”.

What most amuses is that I wrote in haste, but Ross must actually have given the matter some thought.

Comparing the quality of my prose, in extensive evidence on MR, with yours, Ross, is not something you should undertake. You have produced such a small amount of commentary, and of such meager intellectual insightfulness, that even a grammatical accounting which favored you (in fact it wouldn’t) would be very much a Pyrrhic victory.

Kindly go away and exhort and instruct your fellow juveniles.

Posted by Leon Haller on Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:40 | #

Try to learn something, Ross.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 21, 2011, 11:27 PM | #

I have vowed not to waste time commenting on websites anymore, but I am compelled by this topic to say that, though I share your concern, Mr. LaForce, with saving the white race (especially, for me, as doing so is the foundation for Western civilization’s survival - an important point: if 99% of whites became “whiggers”, or some other type of dysgenic retard, I would not be interested in preserving the race, other than for the personal security of myself until I die; I certainly would not involve myself actively with such an impersonal issue), your comments reveal you as nothing more than a race-conscious liberal.

The comments on science and how it will ‘free’ us are particularly inane. Science can never resolve moral problems. I am strongly pro-science, as well as eugenics; these positions do not conflict with Christianity, rightly understood. Neither does white racialism, provided it is not of the aggressive, exterminatory variety (which, as I have argued at length on this site in the past, is the logical endpoint of non-Christian racialism). That racialism and eugenicism are widely seen to be anti-Christian merely reveals first, the extent to which the historic faith has been polluted by the egalitarian currents (or at least rhetoric) of modern elite class thinking dominant in the West; and second, a lack of Christian theological imagination in (admittedly desperate) need of remedy.

I have noticed a spectacular lack of understanding of the real Christian message on the part of seemingly all its critics, whether Marxist, liberal humanist or nationalist. All these different persons, including famous atheists like Richard Dawkins, whose theological knowledge when set against his Olympian pronouncements is embarrassing, assume they understand the faith based on Sunday grade-school simplifications, without having really studied it.

Honestly, to examine the whole relationship between Christianity and science is just too time-consuming, and not worth it in this place. The real issue for WNs is, obviously, not the truth of the faith, but its current and likely future impact on our racial perpetuity.

Pragmatically speaking, I have made exactly the same comments as Hunter Wallace, in several different venues, and they are irrefutable. Even risking establishing WN in the public mind as incompatible with Christianity is empirically stupid to a nearly inconceivable degree, and not only in America, where whites are more religious than in Europe. If you force most whites to have to choose between their faith and their race, they will reluctantly side with the faith against the race. Yes, a parallel track of activism and analysis is better, and no, Christianity on its own will neither save the white race, nor rebuild Western civilization.

Our civilization has a biological and philosophical substrate. Both are indispensable. The biology is of course racial. If pure whites do not continue to exist, the West will die out. The philosophy is primarily Christian. In a thinking species like humans, or at least among an intelligent race like whites (or perhaps all that can be said is that among whites), ideology is apparently more important than mere biology (or else we wouldn’t have the core racial problem, which is not one of physical power set against a looming racial enemy - yet - but of multiculti brainwashing and the concomitant need for white ‘deprogramming’).

The primary intellectual task for WNs today is to demonstrate the compatibility between Christianity and what I call ‘biological realism’ (or maybe I should just say “science”, though that seems too broad, quickly involving cosmological and ontological (esp. ‘free will’) debates not in themselves directly relevant to the ethical justifications required for the tough political measures that will be needed to ensure white survival). I don’t think this is all that difficult (racialism is actually much easier to justify than eugenics), though it will require one to demonstrate an extensive academic grounding in one or another of the major Christian theological traditions.

To put it simply, Christianity does not morally mandate tolerance for endless streams of racially/culturally incompatible immigration (the major, though not only, racialist problem). Yes, the Churches have been infected with contrary nonsense, but why assume that the correct response to such rubbish is to jettison the faith?! Why accede to the (false) leftist egalitarian version of Christianity; find that version wanting; and then conclude that the problem is the faith itself, and that the solution is ignoring or worse attacking it? To me, the correct response, intellectually, is to ‘de-marxify’ the Church’s thinking on race (and much else), and politically, to stress the compatibility between Christianity and WN; to wit, that Christians are allowed multiple affective identities, and that there is no incompatibility between Christian faith and patriotic sentiment, including racial patriotism, which is the base of other patriotisms.

This discussion of the relation between Christianity and race may never be resolved, because the debate between faith and scientism is probably a now permanent feature of the human condition. I’m quite certain, however, that we don’t have to resolve that debate in order to persuade a majority of our people to want to save our race. We only have to show that we whites have a moral right (perhaps even a duty) to endure; that to do so requires territorial separation; and that white nations have been the victims of active treason on the part of our elites, coupled with passive aggression by nonwhites muscling into our homelands, uninvited by the white majorities who morally own these nations.

I’m also certain that the only type of nationalism that will ever take wing (until the literal personal survival of most or all whites is at stake, as it is today in American prisons) is a conservative nationalism that seeks to uphold the dignity of Western civilization, and reconnect our atomized and deracinated peoples with their historic traditions, a big part of which was what went under the heading of “Christendom”. And even if all forms of supernaturalism are finally false, as atheists claim, faith impels men to make great sacrifices, and that gives them great power (as we see with Muslim extremism today). Far better, strictly practically, to integrate with and subvert (if you are liberal) or cleanse (if conservative) the faith, than to imagine that it will ever be supplanted in emotive power by either arid scientific naturalism, or ridiculous ‘religious racialist’ cults or neopaganisms.

Posted by Orca Winfrey on Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:00 | #

Oprah #MeToo #TimesUp Movement Ignores Rapists Who Walk Free

Note: a well done piece, but in the end, of course Lana includes “Leftism” among the things to be blamed, though it is assuredly Not our leftism, not a White union that permits of this, Not The White Class that stands for it.

Comments:

Post a comment:

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Links

MR Central & News

Comments