|
|
|
Anti-Racism is Not Innocent, it is Prejudiced, it is Hurting and it is Killing People Anti-Racism is not innocent, far from innocent, it is prejudiced, it is hurting and it is killing people. It is an impossible, pure Cartesian ideal, prohibiting necessary social perceptual grouping and accountable discrimination accordingly.
Anti-Racism is not innocent, far from innocent, it is prejudiced, it is hurting and it is killing people. It is an impossible, pure Cartesian ideal, prohibiting necessary social perceptual grouping and accountable discrimination accordingly. The title is content. Yes, accountability, a necessity to and for identity, is also prohibited with that: Anti-Racism is killing people with little in the way of an account. It does occur that liberalism is the manifestation of our problem, run wild by Cartesian objectivism and Jewish coercion. Thus, what to call ourselves in response? Conservatism has bad connotations – reactionary, stuck and stodgy. I stand by The White Left conceptually, but am willing to set-aside the word, left, for a while, conceding that it has the draw-back of having been used pervasively in a sense pejorative to Whites. The White Class, however, still sounds good and carries the same positive conceptual capacities. “Paradigmatic Conservative” may be good, if understood properly as meaning conservative borders but relatively free individuality. All that aside for the moment, the wisdom of the language may be shown in the word “deliberate.” We are deliberate in our ecological concern as opposed to imposed dumb and blind faith to accept the mere, natural ravages of liberal Darwinism and of Darwinian liberalism. Deliberate then may form the root of the term we seek in opposition to liberalism; it also provides direct connection to agency and accountability. Of course not all we are born to seek and not all we do in reality is deliberate, but our adjusting responses may be quite deliberate. We might say, should be. “Strong individuals” are liberal because they don’t discriminate but are willing to put resources at risk and compete with anybody, anytime. But that is disingenuous of course, the stuff puerile females are made of and the place to which they are pandered. We are de-liberating from liberalism and de-liberating our people from ecological accountability - ecology is naturally a more conservative matter in ready connotation than is Darwinian selection’s arbitrary component of variation preceding selection and rejection. Human thought, deliberation, occurs on a different level than mere biological impulse - it may be organized with protracted implication, to symbiotic, cooperative effect and account, where seen fit. I fully expect this suggestion to go over like a lead balloon – primarily because it is coming from me, should be coming from another guy, a cute one. But anyway.. Deliberates, The Deliberates, Deliberatism, a Deliberator, member of the Deliberate movement, a Deliberate maverick… The word deliberate has mostly positive connotations, it has agentive connotations, it corresponds with accountability and ecological stewarding. ...deliberate….i.e., open enough to weigh considerations and give them due thought; by choice, purposive, active… ..ruminating.. deliberating from the arbitrary, a synthesis and analysis..
Comments:2
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:34 | # . I am not really doing a survey of what the Left and Right is, so much as stating what the distinction is based on a blending of happy theoretical sorting and ordinary use. I believe that the adoption of the White Left and the stubborn insistence upon the proper definition of that term - that it is not against private property, is not about equality but qualitative difference - could help a great deal. It holds up for me in a consistent sense, and quite benign, except for the mass conditioning against the word, which is considerable. However, in the background of the negative mass conditioning is a positive mass conditioning - humane consideration and a stance against betrayal, particularly the consequences of elitist betrayal - which could be tapped into for Whites, who are saying into the back of their minds, “if only that humane concern and ethnocentric advocacy were applied to Whites” - hence, “the White Left, the White Class.” Regarding progressivism and conservatism, I don’t think its a good idea. Makes them sound good and us sound stuck and reactionary. However, “progressivism” is inadvertently descriptive in a pejorative sense as one of those impervious, modernist, Enlightenment notions - they think they are progressing toward foundational truth: coordination, resources and people wrecked along the way, be damned as necessary casualties of progress (Jewish “perfecting” of us, as you note) As liberalness is our pervasive problem, I am not yet ready to set-aside Deliberate [Deliberal, Deliberist] as the oppositional term. It is uncanny how many positive things it has going for it at once: choice, etymological opposition to liberal; a gathering together of relevant variables under consideration for the purpose of sufficient synthesis and analysis; thought, responsibility, carefulness, unlike “conservative” it is actional not reactionary; it provides connotation of accountability, agency, warrant, ecological stewarding… purposive, weighing options with historical consideration and judgment.
Speaking of that, I have been saying “Anti-Racism is prejudice, it is not innocent, it is hurting and it is killing people” for over twenty years”... long before there was such a thing as “the mantra”... The mantra may take away some of its shock appeal. Still, I am not against the mantra, it is just that the few times I tried it out, it did not work very well for various reasons. 3
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:12 | # Governor of Wyoming plans to flood state with high risk Conglese refugees at taxpayer expense 4
Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 02:51 | # WTF is up with the stupid screen “art” that DanielS insists on prefacing his posts with? Is it really necessary? It simply wastes a lot of real estate, and pushes viewers away from more valuable articles. BTW, Thorn, that was a truly horrific link - exactly the kind of practical issue that nationalists ought to be concerned with, rather than airy-fairy abstractions of remote or no value to the political struggle. Nationalism really doesn’t have to be that complicated, and the more complex its adherents insist that it be, the smaller its potentially receptive audience. Racial nationalism is simply about preserving the purity and perpetuity of the white race by means of establishing whites-only territories for whites to inhabit (these used to be called “white countries”), as well as building up race pride and a willingness to fight for white interests amongst whites living in irrevocably racially diversified polities. What exactly is so complicated or sophisticated about any of this? Nobody gives a s—- about “palingenesis v. existence”. At most, racially concerned whites might want to see ethical and/or theological justifications for their innate “racism”; ie, ordinary whites who know that multiracialism makes life worse for them and theirs want to be persuaded that their racist feelings are neither abnormal nor unethical. Beyond that, people just want leaders who will stop their further racial dispossession, and begin the long fight to win back some of our ceded grounds (whether territorial or legal). 5
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:14 | # Posted by Leon Haller on March 01, 2014, 09:51 PM | # WTF is up with the stupid screen “art” that DanielS insists on prefacing his posts with? Well, Leon, idiot, if you must know, the image was supposed to be smaller - on that scale, it creates something of an optical illusion between the diamond shapes. I decided to leave it up because I wanted to create some shock and some distance from the preceding “gay” entry.
It is not that simple but for a simpleton like you. and pushes viewers away from more valuable articles. There is no more valuable message, and you know it you lying dog. BTW, Thorn, that was a truly horrific link - exactly the kind of practical issue that nationalists ought to be concerned with, rather than airy-fairy abstractions of remote or no value to the political struggle. This is yours and Thorn’s angle (probably as paid trolls) to continually promote Christianity and say that MR should be “down to earth”, even though it has always been as site which delves into intellectual concern…which, by the way, is imperative to understand the Jewish adversary. Anti-racism is not innocent, it is hurting and killing people. Very complicated, nice try Haller. Why don’t you finally leave as you have said you would? I saw that Radix was recommended to you. Its true. It is a better place for you and Thorn.
6
Posted by Robert Reis on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 05:26 | # One Pissed Off Irishman said… Why didn’t anyone ever help me? Is it because I’m White? -One Pissed Off Irishman 7
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 06:07 | # /. Our people, men especially, are starving at the feast of plenty, while charity and our greatest treasures are being given to wild apes who hate us. The ignoring of Whites like this is why I am repulsed by the WN exponents who go on and on expressing concern for “the black family”, the feelings of non-Whites as well as imperative concern for all people. They don’t give an F about people like this… that’s not a sexy concern to the women who empower them. They want to pretend separatism is a “Jewish divide and conquer tactic”.. Well, I thought we wanted to be divided and to look after our own! When we take initiatives for separatism and looking after our own, relevant obstructions will emerge clearly enough to those not yet aware, as well. 8
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:00 | #
Nobody except those that subscribe to a non-Cartesian, anti-Lockian, leftist (but not leftist as defined by jews) quasi-Aristotelian approach to naval gazing.
It should be highlighted that the Governor helping to push that atrocity on the people of Wyoming is a Republican. Which leads us to conclude there is virtually no opposition to the race-replacement of white people in the KWA. At least not in the ruling class there isn’t. The ruling class is thoroughly committed to a pro-immigration, pro-growth economic model and they’re not going to let anyone stand in their way. They don’t give a flying fig if such a model leaves the fate of the white race hanging in the balance. WRT a common sense approach to WP, here is Jared Taylor’s response to Michael Rienzi’s essay on EGI. I think it’s worth revisiting. Subjective Reasons are Sufficient Comments on Mr. Rienzi’s article.
9
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:48 | # Nobody gives a s—- about “palingenesis v. existence”. Nobody except those that subscribe to a non-Cartesian, anti-Lockian, leftist (but not leftist as defined by jews) quasi-Aristotelian approach to naval gazing
pretty close except for the naval gazing bit.. 10
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:58 | # On the amnesty front:
11
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:25 | #
Leon, It’s nigger art. Obviously Danny is trying to attract niggers to MR. 12
Posted by Robert Reis on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:33 | # Value of of white life in UKanda Mother of Lewis Gill who killed Asperger’s sufferer Andrew Young calls crime ‘no big deal’ http://dailym.ai/1o6WwVJ via @MailOnline 13
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:36 | # Posted by Thorn on March 02, 2014, 07:25 PM | # WTF is up with the stupid screen “art” that DanielS insists on prefacing his posts with? Is it really necessary? It simply wastes a lot of real estate, and pushes viewers away from more valuable articles. Leon, It’s nigger art. Obviously Danny is trying to attract niggers to MR.
How much money to you get to spam here? 14
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:00 | # @Robert Reis I posted that story at many conservative blogs/websites and it generated almost zero interest. White conservatives are more concerned with defending abstract concepts —viz the lofty ideals of a color-blind society—than to defend their kith and kin. F’ing pathetic. But that’s the world we live in…. 15
Posted by Robert Reis on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:04 | # an innocent abroad said… So ignore the rhetoric and what do you see? Could it be possible that the goal of US Foreign Policy is to surround Russia and China with a ring of fire, violently chaotic failed states? Could it be concidence that the very states we’ve put to the torch are atop huge petroleum resources, or are positioned astride critical passage points? Could it be that the US always cozies up to the most violent and unreasonable parties in every situation? Why? Perhaps because those are the armed loonies who simply won’t come to a solution, because what we want is chaos, and what we don’t want is any sort of solution? Would it be our goal to hide behind our oceans, disrupt any competitor’s chance to take a part of our power, take physical resources like oil and at least keep it away from a competitor? Would we shrink from using a scorched-earth policy to keep the rest of the world divided, distracted and weak, for our benefit in access to resources later? 16
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:15 | # Thornblosom says “F’ing pathetic. But that’s the world we live in”…. This is one of their strategies, to continually promote White apathy, just as Ilana Mercer would prescribe to Whites.
“Could it be that the US always cozies up to the most violent and unreasonable parties in every situation? Why? Perhaps because those are the armed loonies who simply won’t come to a solution, because what we want is chaos, and what we don’t want is any sort of solution?”
17
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:17 | # Thornblosom says “F’ing pathetic. But that’s the world we live in”…. This is one of their strategies, to continually promote White apathy, just as Ilana Mercer would prescribe to Whites.
“Could it be that the US always cozies up to the most violent and unreasonable parties in every situation? Why? Perhaps because those are the armed loonies who simply won’t come to a solution, because what we want is chaos, and what we don’t want is any sort of solution?”
,,,,,,,,,,, 18
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:20 | # Here ya go, Danny: <img>http://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/FirstMourning.jpg</img> 19
Posted by Robert Reis on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:22 | # Videos blacks make in France 21
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:23 | # No thanks Thornblossom: remember, you are free to leave! All those Christian sites set to welcome you! Go there! 22
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:57 | #
Same applies to you, Danny. In fact most would welcome your departure. 23
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 02:07 | #
24
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 02:10 | # Posted by Thorn on March 02, 2014, 08:57 PM | # No thanks Thornblossom: remember, you are free to leave! Same applies to you, Danny. In fact most would welcome your departure. Go to hell Thornblossom. There are plenty of Christian, NS, and philosemitic sites around. How much do you get paid to troll, harass and derail as much as you can? Why don’t you leave? 26
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:44 | # Thorn, You walking piece of dog shit, go to one of the many Christian sites. 27
Posted by Silver on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:11 | # If this site is to ever regain its (admittedly meager) former glory, ridding itself of DanielS is an absolutely essential step. Alas, with GW at the helm the prospects of that are slim indeed. The only hope may be to annoy the cretin enough that he ups and leaves of his own accord, like Bowery did. (In fairness, Bowery’s contributions, while often ‘out there,’ tower over the tripe that is DanielS’s stock in trade. Never thought I’d say this, but I miss the sonvabitch.) So keep up the good work, Thorn. Haller, yes the screen art is utterly ridiculous, but then so is almost everything else that DanielS produces so it hardly seems worth singling it out. 28
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:15 | # Silver, I will continue to identify and harass you in return for the non-White Trojan horse that you are, opening gates to Jews and other non-Whites with your Christiardity, wonderfully “successful tolerance” and imperative “golden rule”. I will not let up on Christards such as you or Thorn - who are about that gate opening, imposing that middle eastern affectation among other obstruction. You say that you are not White, that you have an affinity for the Levant (and Anatolia) and that you are a Christian (but Uncle Adolf was right - why would you, after all, care that millions of Whites got killed?). What the hell are you doing here but trolling? Surely no good. There are other places where you can share in the glory of Jesus shining down on the swarthoids. 29
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 01:10 | # Silver, There is no chance ridicule will pry Danny from his new found home. He is like a hermit crab. He found the empty shell, which MR is, and filled it. Crabby Danny will fight to the death against anyone who tries to evict him because he fully wel knows—more than anyone else—that he has nowhere else to go. The best we can do is make his stay uncomfertable. 30
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 04:33 | # Posted by Thorn on March 03, 2014, 08:10 PM | # “Silver, There is no chance ridicule will pry Danny from his new found home. He is like a hermit crab. He found the empty shell, which MR is, and filled it. Crabby Danny will fight to the death against anyone who tries to evict him because he fully wel knows—more than anyone else—that he has nowhere else to go. The best we can do is make his stay uncomfertable.” Thornblossom, there are plenty of places where I might go, but I like MR and recognize that it is a crucial place in White Nationalism in providing a platform where serious thought might be applied to its problems without imposing the false answers of Hitler and Jesus. Thorn wants MR to be a down to earth talkin’ Christian site, all friendly to conservative Jewish folks.. Just like this site has never been… Blossom, there are plenty of Jesus places for you and Silver to go. 31
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:18 | # David Duke put on a good show regarding the slave trade: 03-04-14 “Dr. David Duke today does a special program of the Hollywood Academy Awards to the movie: 12 Years a Slave. He shows how the Jewish Hollywood establishment completely covers up Jewish historians many books boasting how less than 1 percent of the world’s population, the Jews, have dominated the world’s slave trade for 2,ooo years, including the American slave trade. He shows how movies like this one are promoted as psychological weapons against European Americans to assist in Jewish supremacy over them and over the non-European populations through a divide and conquer scenario. Dr. Slattery comes on near the end of this show to offer some prescient commentary on it as well. We urge listeners of this broadcast to make a YouTube video out of this program so as to share its important points with the world!” 32
Posted by Robert Reis on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:28 | # I have complete contempt for slime that insult Hitler and Jesus. 33
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:38 | # Well, Jesus is an enveloped Jewish lie that probably caused more destruction to Europeans than anything. And Hitler had an inadequate world view which had significant part in causing the death of millions of Europeans. Obviously, you cannot see those plain facts, so I don’t care what you think about me. 35
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:53 | # Hitler was not a Christian either: you are contradicting yourself 36
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:21 | # Ya know, Danny, I’ve been around here for three years or more and never witnessed Robert Reis react negatively to other MR commenters. You are the first, Danny. When it comes to the wining friends and influencing people contest, congratulations go to Danny for wining the booby prize. Idiot! 37
Posted by DanielS on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:44 | # ........... Those who see fit to think outside these boxes are “Putzes” to you. Your native Yiddish came through, oy vay! Galileo what a putz! 38
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 01:56 | # Danny, Nobody (Repeat: NOBODY!) takes anything you have to say as serious thought. Hasn’t it occurred to you yet? HELLO!!!!! 40
Posted by DanielS on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:45 | # Among several reasons why this main post’s characterization of “anti-racism” can be preferable is that it does not invoke clear subjective concern which might be readily dismissed as such. This “sonnet” on counter currents recapitulates the mantra.. http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/03/post-modern-sonnet/ ...and it will be found that in some contexts that “just a code word for anti White” works.. in other situations it will be awkward at best. 41
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:00 | # In his usual exquisite style, Jared Taylor does a superb job reviewing James Kalb’s new book titled: Against Inclusiveness: How the Diversity Regime is Flattening America and the West and What to Do About It
43
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 30 Mar 2014 16:19 | # Heidegger’s remarks on Jews - quite good. I think GW would appreciate this as well. http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/03/heidegger-on-world-jewry-in-the-black-notebooks/ Heidegger’s take would seem to dismiss my suggestion for deliberation, treating such considerations as machinations, a Jewish way which tends to destroy racial differences between people, which does not sufficiently allow for the historical being of the race, issues which are always beyond full consciousness but provide the funding of authentic Being. I would contend that deliberation does not necessarily conflict with or disrespect these matters. 44
Posted by Johnson in defense of prejudice on Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:40 | # Greg Johnson in defense of prejudice. Post a comment:
Next entry: Savage future – Part 1
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) Commentsweremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:34. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:42. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:27. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:49. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:37. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:24. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:16. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:43. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:42. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:38. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:23. (View) |
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:51 | #
On left and right, I have argued with little agreement from others that nationalists cannot make use of these terms to describe their own politics. Some years ago we had quite a few posts on the Political Compass website:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/
A number of us took the test and found that, on the mapped in completely disassociated ways. Our values simply did not compute, and the engines spat us out all over the place.
In the aftermath of that experience there was some discussion about designing a nationalist compass that would actually represent the gradations within our opinion. I remember proposing palingenesis <> existence for one axis. The social element in nationalism is universal to the entire ouevre, and does not enlighten us about distinctions between nationalism. However, progressivism and conservatism may be a useful candidate for an axis.