|
|
Bio-centric YuppiedomLawrence Auster’s scathing and accurate criticism of the Sailerite/GNXP worldview: “Bio-centric Yuppiedom”. Posted by Phil Peterson on Sunday, October 23, 2005 at 04:00 PM in Political analysis Comments:2
Posted by Truth Be Told on October 23, 2005, 07:17 PM | # Sounds like he got you, Stevie. Did your check from the ADL clear your account yet? 3
Posted by Geoff Beck on October 23, 2005, 09:31 PM | # Sailer knows where his bread is buttered; he wants to write for AmConMag, UPI, and etc… Taking a chance on WN’ism is a bridge too far. Well, “a man’s got to know his limitations.” 4
Posted by Desmond Jones on October 24, 2005, 02:17 AM | # Of course, Auster’s case falls apart when it comes to Judaism, at which point he runs for cover amongst the Sailerites. Despite 6000 years of separateness, ‘the people who shall dwell alone’, will assimilate and embrace the age-old traditions of European man, according to Auster. For the Jews, as KMAc has pointed out, it is all about biological reductionism. It’s the biological preservation of a Jewish race/religion. If ‘biological reductionism is associated with secularism’ how does he explain diaspora Orthodox Judaism. Auster’s notion fails because he must embrace Jewry and Jewry is an anathema to Christian tradition. How does Auster plan to assimilate the Jews without embracing the Sailer notion that ‘people marry whom they will’? Accepting Auster’s dismissal of Sailer is to accept a dismissal of KMac. 5
Posted by John S Bolton on October 25, 2005, 04:06 AM | # The ad hominem criticisms don’t score against Auster or Sailer, but it seems Auster’s objections against some such citizenism could be answered. Sailer’s description of citizenship as being like shareholding does sound depleted of higher values. At the same time there is a contradiction in terms involved in our being asked to value, as citizens, the devaluation of our citizenship, as by mass immigration. In those terms, the contradiction offends against ideal reason. Sailer doesn’t say why the state must prefer the citizen; he even calls it favor, as if justice would have us increase the aggression on our fellow nationals, to take care of foreign hostiles! My objection to both Sailer and Auster on these points, is that they do not keep clear that they are dealing with the ethics of aggression. It is not a matter of values other than those strictly regarding aggression, if it is political. The absolute loyalty must be to the principle that foreign aggressors are in a special class. It is treason for officals to divert public resources to foreign hostiles here. Receiving net public subsidy this way, is perfect demonstration of the hostile status of such foreigners here. 6
Posted by John S Bolton on October 25, 2005, 04:25 AM | # The question of love for a foreigner should appear now in an altogether different aspect. The relevant point is whether bringing the foreigner here results in an increase in the aggression on your fellow nationals, especially the net taxpayer. If it does, your nation may use any degree of counteraggression to crush that relationship. It may do so dispassionately, or with high passion. There can be no duty to grant citizenship to hostiles. Love does not conquer all. Next entry: Condi for President? Previous entry: BNP banned again |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Trofigiogelry commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 03:25 PM. (go) (view) Industrial Training in Android commented in entry 'Sound principles of money, by Arthur Kitson' on 05/23/12, 02:50 PM. (go) (view) ovephorie commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 02:41 PM. (go) (view) Bexserutver commented in entry 'Paranoia at a neck-tie party' on 05/23/12, 01:11 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Cogfreero commented in entry 'Obama-speak' on 05/23/12, 12:51 PM. (go) (view) Cresenewona commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 12:50 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) bookofratricks.de commented in entry 'Hearing Jonathan Bowden' on 05/23/12, 12:35 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) UnsefsZetle commented in entry 'More thread wars' on 05/23/12, 12:12 PM. (go) (view) Endadytexitty commented in entry 'A conversation with Alex Linder' on 05/23/12, 12:08 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Cogfreero commented in entry 'Diversity and moral transformation' on 05/23/12, 11:16 AM. (go) (view) Mopnoictscoft commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 10:59 AM. (go) (view) Click here commented in entry 'Christmas is Racist' on 05/23/12, 08:51 AM. (go) (view) Moilallwriday commented in entry 'Ripples under the White ice' on 05/23/12, 08:43 AM. (go) (view) SEO Services commented in entry 'The French shooter' on 05/23/12, 08:22 AM. (go) (view) Joinnamenviaw commented in entry 'Hollywood In Danger of Making Historically Unprecedented Returns From Pro-Euroman Movies' on 05/23/12, 08:15 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) Teptcrakarp commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 06:31 AM. (go) (view) terostik commented in entry 'The Human Rights Fraud' on 05/23/12, 06:21 AM. (go) (view) angemsRag commented in entry 'The Mendacity of the Realist' on 05/23/12, 04:53 AM. (go) (view) carlos penny commented in entry 'Bankers Swindling the Guarantors of their Reserve Currency' on 05/23/12, 04:36 AM. (go) (view) abibemume commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 04:33 AM. (go) (view) Leone Siciliani commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/23/12, 04:27 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) angemsRag commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 02:27 AM. (go) (view) insaleenvency commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 01:38 AM. (go) (view) alexaesjiong commented in entry 'Seeking Chinese Nationalist For Majority Radio Guest Spot' on 05/23/12, 12:43 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Europe 2015' on 05/23/12, 12:28 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Precious Williams' on 05/23/12, 12:22 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'The Bear’s Lair: The immortal Smoot' on 05/22/12, 11:53 PM. (go) (view) HoroSmutS commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/22/12, 11:48 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Svigor on October 23, 2005, 05:10 PM | #
He calls it “romantic,” yet romance and soulless biological reductionism make an odd match indeed
Lol, Auster’s been drop-kicking Sailer lately. “Romance” is fine when it serves Sailer’s needs (individualistic) but not when it works against them (collectivistic).
Like Ray, Sailer is opposed to WNism only because he wants to be.