|
|
Blair’s New Britain
Next stop Cool Britannia? This piece in Saturday’s Daily Mail could not be allowed to pass without comment here, even at the very real risk of re-igniting the Cock-up or Conspiracy debate that inflamed passions around these parts not so long ago. Has there been a single confirmed Scrooby sighting since? Blair defends opening the door to mass migration
While the Mail article succeeds in its obvious aim of getting the readers stoked up (almost 600 overwhelmingly hostile comments so far) it fails to add any real context or search for greater meaning, taking the opportunity to slag off Tony Blair being apparently an end in itself. But, we perhaps we need to probe a little deeper ... The Mail’s paraphrasing and direct quotes evidently came from an interview that Blair gave recently (we don’t know exactly where or when) to a brace of journalists from the London-based periodical Eastern Eye, which styles itself as “The Voice of British Asians”. The resulting article appears in the special Diwali Edition which was published earlier this month.
There appears to be no transcript of the interview on their website, but there is an (obviously edited) video version available: From this it is possible to glean which of Blair’s multifarious and variegated hats was in place at the time, and it seems clear that the discussion was held under the auspices of, and with the intention of promoting, the Tony Blair Faith Foundation, one of the several vanity projects to which the Great Man has devoted himself since leaving office. For present purposes, the most relevant aspect of his Faith Foundation to the immigration debate would seem to be the Faith and Globalisation Initiative, which has as one of its principal themes the nexus between religion and migration:
The first several minutes of the video interview is concerned with Blair’s thoughts about India, which he evidently views as a successful society, having found the ‘right balance’ between faith and secularism, and one that can teach Britain important lessons about how ‘people of different faiths can live peacefully together’. In fact, he has rather more nice words to say about India than about his own homeland, although this might just be his trademark shameless pandering. The discussion turns to immigration around the six minute mark, Blair commenting that:
Non-globalised Britons evidently won’t be able cut the mustard in Blair’s New Britain. Then, after noting that “the Indian community in Britain has immensely enriched our national life” (while unaccountably neglecting to identify any specific instances of such enrichment), he goes on to note that:
I’m not sure I recall such a plain and straightforward expression of his core beliefs on the matter while he was seeking election, nor for that matter while he was in office. But the mask has now slipped. While there is little question that Blair’s worldview is shared, to a greater or lesser extent, across the entire managerial elite, it is fascinating to ponder how someone like Blair came to embrace the view he has. Was it simple careerism, as some have claimed? Or was it ‘emotional incontinence’ as others have proposed, the same craving for approval and adulation that led him to become the leading proponent of the ‘Dianaisation’ of Britain? What compels someone of an unremarkable middle-class background and upbringing, the very antithesis of radical chic, to want to embark on such a crusade? What were the crucial formative influences on Blair that led him on the path he has taken? Was he got at? We need to understand what made Tony Blair what he is now and what he may yet still become. Posted by Dan Dare on Sunday, October 30, 2011 at 03:51 PM in Immigration, Liberalism & the Left Comments:2
Posted by CL on October 31, 2011, 06:33 AM | # “What compels someone of an unremarkable middle-class background and upbringing, the very antithesis of radical chic, to want to embark on such a crusade? What were the crucial formative influences on Blair that led him on the path he has taken? Was he got at? We need to understand what made Tony Blair what he is now and what he may yet still become.” He may have been got at, but it stands to reason that he’s a common brown-noser who sees money as everything, with an uncommon amount of political aptitude, plus a lot of luck. And he’s absolutely shameless—not unlike his American cognate, Bill Clinton. ‘Tony Blair, Theologian?’ He should be a comedian. Blair will continue to pander to whoever is in control, to whatever degree is sufficient to be noticed and valuable. If der Führer invaded, he’d be waving the Union Jack higher and harder than anyone. If der Führer won, he’d be the spokesman babbling about a ‘greater Britain,’ etc. Same with aliens from Mars. Blair lives under a judeo-financial regime which holds British genocide as one of its social tenets, so he behaves accordingly. When the regime changes, he’ll change. He’s not the only one like that. 3
Posted by Guessedworker on October 31, 2011, 07:08 AM | # I think you are right, CL. We saw the communist political class of eastern Europe transmogrify into Western liberals overnight. The political type is, no doubt of necessity, inconstant and lightweight (with some honourable exceptions such as Ron Paul in the US and Frank Field and Kate Hoey and, perhaps, John Redwood in the UK). The deeper question, then, is: why does politics throughout the European world select its advocates from this material? One could speculate that the three great issues of political life - race, nation and economy - are shaped by forces that operate beyond politics. Nothing of existential gravity is open to debate. It’s a case of “cometh the hour, goeth the man.” Maybe. To effect change would require the return of the existential to politics and public discourse. 4
Posted by Leon Haller on October 31, 2011, 07:11 AM | # Blair is a true believer in utopian race liberalism. I have met a number like this in my life; a few even called themselves “conservatives” (and several were self-styled “libertarians”). Why assume some hidden underlying motive? George W. Bush, conspiracists notwithstanding, had no real motive to try to shove an illegal alien amnesty down America’s throat. I sense that he truly supported it, and mainly on what he perceived to be moral grounds. I think it’s a mistake to underestimate the extent to which white people are suckers for racial idealism. I’ve seen it so very often. The real question is what the hell was the matter with the British people in electing this fool. The same question could be asked of Americans viz Obama, but at least he only garnered 43% of the white vote (though he got an alarmingly high proportion of young whites, which is what really matters), and he will get less next year. But how did Blair get elected - I forget now - 3 (?) times? Especially on the third go, after the immigration invasion was widely recognized? The white race is infected with the same global meme, and that infection is rapidly segregating white populations precisely along race-liberal v nationalist psychological lines. Unfortunately, all evidence suggests the liberals are winning, in terms of both the importation of nonwhites, and the brainwashing of whites. Only a thoroughgoing ‘inorganic’ solution like my favored White Zion offers any chance of preventing white extinction. Whites are going to have to choose to survive, and fight to survive. 5
Posted by anon / uh on October 31, 2011, 09:50 AM | # Leon, Please stop reminding us of your academic schedule. We understand. You’re as busy as a bee sucking the nectar of knowledge.
You are right about this, however they like to and must deny it. Sadly!
The seven-BILLIONTH human was just born in the Philippines. Or India. It makes no difference. The numbers are in across the world: whites are on the way out.
6
Posted by Jimmy Marr on October 31, 2011, 11:14 AM | # Fortunately for you Doubting Thomas’, tonight is Samhain Eve, and I will be in spiritual contact with the Nazi underworld. If you have any questions you would like me to ask the Fuhrer, post them before midnight GMT. P.S. This is serious business, so no fucking around by any smart-asses, particularly, but not limited to, Anon/Uh. P.P.S. As Leon will fully appreciate, if this plan of mine doesn’t work, it will be because you jerk-offs didn’t believe in it enough. 7
Posted by anon / uh on October 31, 2011, 02:33 PM | # Uh asks Fuehrer: So how hard is Roehm [redacted] FEGELEIN down there? 8
Posted by Dan Dare on October 31, 2011, 03:57 PM | # I’m going to ask GW to place an immediate embargo on any more Downfall mashups, immediately after I post this final one. 9
Posted by CL on October 31, 2011, 04:20 PM | # Leon said:
Bush is an opportunist. Mestizo amnesties align on the axes of Big Jew and Big Business (plus it can win a bunch of swing states in the midwest, where the farm crowd has bought the lie that they’re all going out-of-business if they don’t give their country away). ‘Morality’ is simply a rationalization, likely only a public one—similar to the con that all the mongrels are going to vote Republican out of gratitude. The surprise would be if the Bushes didn’t support an amnesty. The Bushes don’t actually believe, but dollars come before even blood in their clan. Look at their marriages. They’re whores. Jimmy Carter is a True Believer. He honest-to-watered-down-God believes that sooty hordes will erect a statue of him to worship in their mongrel utopia—‘2001’-style, apes around monolith. Tony Blair would lie about the weather if he thought the angle were worth it. Would you believe him if he told you his favorite ice cream flavor? Then why would you impute deep piety to him regarding something that matters politically—the realm in which he’s the *least* reliable and *most* prone to shift with the winds, proven time and again? The commonality among the opportunists is that they believe they’re above it all—that they’re ‘insiders’ who, due to their wealth and connections, are more equal than others. It’s another similarity to those communist bureaucrats, who were ‘more equal than others’. 10
Posted by Revolution Harry on October 31, 2011, 05:26 PM | # “Cock-up or conspiracy?” Do you still need to ask that question? Blair’s just playing his part in the game. A New World Order: In Their Own words (see Blair at 4.50). “In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. Of course, for political as well as administrative reasons, some of these specialized arrangements should be brought into an appropriate relationship with the central institutions of the U.N. system, but the main thing is that the essential functions be performed.” Richard N. Gardner “The Hard Road to World Order” Foreign Affairs 1974 11
Posted by Guessedworker on October 31, 2011, 06:28 PM | # Very funny video, Dan. Bit disturbing that anyone with such a sharp satyrical cutting edge should know so much about football. 12
Posted by hereticalharv on November 01, 2011, 01:02 AM | # What a scoop! how on earth did you get that picture of Africans on a truck before Irish Savant? 13
Posted by Stuart on November 01, 2011, 03:57 PM | # Blair is a prostitute. He prostituted his government before monied interests, including, the billionaire Indian steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal and many others. His government was practically for sale. Blair is representative of the white middle class and upper middle class in Britain. Among the snobbish well-to-do whites, all this is considered elevated opinion and considered good taste. Anti-immigration and racism are for the “white trash”. Blair was loved by the white middle class. As a white Briton, it is very difficult to stomach this but that is simply a fact which must be admitted. And the white middle class has opinions and proclivities that are often the polar opposite of the white working class. Its relationship with the white working class is based on snobbery and a belief in its own superiority - ironically, because the middle class supposedly believes in equality and the white working class doesn’t (not on race anyway). Blair was pandering to minority monied interests that are always much more aggressive than majority monied interests. In addition, he was pandering to the white middle class which shapes public opinion in Britain. This is why you get uncontrolled immigration even with a massive majority resenting it every day. The middle class has done well out of immigration overall. It gets cheap nannies, industry gets cheap labour and they get to stick it to the working class whites to show how racist they are and, therefore, they get what they deserve. It is really not that hard to understand this once one gets into the mind of the Oxbridge educated snobs that make up the middle and upper middle class in Britain. It is a fallacy on the “racialist” right that the battle can be won by winning over the majority. It doesn’t work that way. The majority does not form opinions in this country. The educated middle class minority does (middle class in Britain not to be confused with middle class in America - two entirely different things). “Racialist” parties will keep banging their heads against a brick wall in trying to understand why their causes keep failing despite the fact that the majority’s instincts support most of them. And yes, to answer Leon Haller’s question, this is how Blair gets elected three times - because the middle class which forms opinion leads the majority in voting for Blair. And really, how different is Cameron from Blair? He isn’t. Cameron is Blair Mark II or worse. It is the same in America - with a heavier monied Jewish influence. 14
Posted by Stuart on November 01, 2011, 04:10 PM | # It is also funny how Blair talks down “materialism” despite being a money grubbing scumbag who whored his government to the highest bidder at every available opportunity in his life and ever since he stepped down from office, has spent every single day trying to make money whoring himself to every corporate interest that wants to hire him. What a shameless, lying hypocrite. And the middle class loves him. That sums it up. 15
Posted by Robert Reis on November 01, 2011, 05:26 PM | # 16
Posted by CL on November 01, 2011, 09:04 PM | # Stuart said:
Would you elaborate, please? 17
Posted by Stuart on November 02, 2011, 03:26 AM | # CL, try this: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/janetdaley/100023606/we-need-a-new-definition-of-middle-class/ Next entry: Drew Fraser on The Wasp Question Previous entry: Pale - Wake up brothers and sisters! |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Trofigiogelry commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 03:25 PM. (go) (view) Industrial Training in Android commented in entry 'Sound principles of money, by Arthur Kitson' on 05/23/12, 02:50 PM. (go) (view) ovephorie commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 02:41 PM. (go) (view) Bexserutver commented in entry 'Paranoia at a neck-tie party' on 05/23/12, 01:11 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Cogfreero commented in entry 'Obama-speak' on 05/23/12, 12:51 PM. (go) (view) Cresenewona commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 12:50 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) bookofratricks.de commented in entry 'Hearing Jonathan Bowden' on 05/23/12, 12:35 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) UnsefsZetle commented in entry 'More thread wars' on 05/23/12, 12:12 PM. (go) (view) Endadytexitty commented in entry 'A conversation with Alex Linder' on 05/23/12, 12:08 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Cogfreero commented in entry 'Diversity and moral transformation' on 05/23/12, 11:16 AM. (go) (view) Mopnoictscoft commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 10:59 AM. (go) (view) Click here commented in entry 'Christmas is Racist' on 05/23/12, 08:51 AM. (go) (view) Moilallwriday commented in entry 'Ripples under the White ice' on 05/23/12, 08:43 AM. (go) (view) SEO Services commented in entry 'The French shooter' on 05/23/12, 08:22 AM. (go) (view) Joinnamenviaw commented in entry 'Hollywood In Danger of Making Historically Unprecedented Returns From Pro-Euroman Movies' on 05/23/12, 08:15 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) Teptcrakarp commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 06:31 AM. (go) (view) terostik commented in entry 'The Human Rights Fraud' on 05/23/12, 06:21 AM. (go) (view) angemsRag commented in entry 'The Mendacity of the Realist' on 05/23/12, 04:53 AM. (go) (view) carlos penny commented in entry 'Bankers Swindling the Guarantors of their Reserve Currency' on 05/23/12, 04:36 AM. (go) (view) abibemume commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 04:33 AM. (go) (view) Leone Siciliani commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/23/12, 04:27 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) angemsRag commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 02:27 AM. (go) (view) insaleenvency commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 01:38 AM. (go) (view) alexaesjiong commented in entry 'Seeking Chinese Nationalist For Majority Radio Guest Spot' on 05/23/12, 12:43 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Europe 2015' on 05/23/12, 12:28 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Precious Williams' on 05/23/12, 12:22 AM. (go) (view) Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'The Bear’s Lair: The immortal Smoot' on 05/22/12, 11:53 PM. (go) (view) HoroSmutS commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/22/12, 11:48 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Graham_Lister on October 30, 2011, 03:58 PM | #
I thought Blair* might want a shot at becoming US President? Don’t worry the Republican party will save America.
*I know he can’t but the man can dream yes?