Boldly going where no detective has gone before

Posted by James Bowery on July 20, 2007, 01:02 PM | #

Some time ago I wrote saying that all ethnic minorities, as well as a good number of white liberals, are anti-white racists. I didn’t mean in-your-face, Nation-of-Islam-style racism, but the subtle, unthinking, subliminal kind. Now I think I was being too kind. There’s nothing subtle about the views which have to underlie the following actions:

I’ve sat in meetings of the Nation of Islam while members of the Fruit of Islam stood glowering over me waiting for me to break out in violence against the speaker who was preaching about the “white devil”.

I was more comfortable in those meetings, under immediate threat of physical violence, than I do around most paleoconservatives let alone neoconservatives and “liberals” for a simple reason:

The stated policy of the Nation of Islam is to accept responsibility for all criminals of African descent within an African American homeland and by implication respecting the establishment of other homelands for other racialists.  Yes, they want $1 Trillion in reparations for slavery and significant territory in the US southeast.  They do not stand opposed to similar homelands for Euro Americans although they, like Euroams, do understandably have hotheads that must be contained within appropriate military discipline.

This is why I am happy to be listed by NOI’s publication “Final Call” as a donor, to the Million Man March on Washington, D.C.

If they are willing to do business, so should we be.

When others come out of their hypocrisy to openly express hatred of Euromen, they do not do so within the context of offers of self-determination—they do so within the context of justifying Politically Correct Supremacy.

Posted by gongstar on July 20, 2007, 03:36 PM | #

Whichever is the case, we are seeing ethnic feelings and image being put above white lives.

Jews will think:

“Good!”

White liberals will think:

“Not important white lives!”

Posted by Lurker on July 20, 2007, 08:30 PM | #

James, I didnt know that.

Used NoI as a shorthand, sloppy of me.

Posted by Proofreader on July 22, 2007, 05:46 AM | #

It makes you wonder how proper English policemen put up with such PC practices. There must be some proud, strong , healthy Englishmen still left in the force, one must hope.

Posted by Alex Zeka on July 22, 2007, 10:44 AM | #

There’s a bit in Peter Hitchen’s Abolition of Liberty about what’s happened to the old timers. To put it simply, they were told that they had to put up or shut up, and being as duty-minded as they had to be to join the police they did. Excess ‘politeness’ has always been anglo conservatism’s downfall.

Posted by Proofreader on July 22, 2007, 11:54 AM | #

I´ve also read about the decadence of policing in Theodore Dalrymple´s writings…
There´s some hope that the younger policemen will revolt one day:

The Policeman’s Blog

A Journey into the mad, mad world of the British underclass and the Public sector, where nothing is too insane for it to be written down and copied in triplicate. VIEWS EXPRESSED PROBABLY DON’T REFLECT OFFICIAL POLICY. “This blog will do more to put people off calling the police than anything, other than actually calling the police.”

http://coppersblog.blogspot.com/

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2007, 12:51 PM | #

“A Journey into the mad, mad world of the British underclass and the Public sector, where nothing is too insane for it to be written down and copied in triplicate.”  (—Proofreader)

Likely two-thirds of that madness is something they were driven to by the new and improved U.K.‘s social and immigration/race-replacement policies, and as for the third that was already latent in them, what greater way to deal with it than start ramming the teeming non-white Third-World billions down their throats while warning them if they made so much as a peep of complaint they’d be hauled off to jail for “hate thoughts”?

Whose fault is the sorry, desperate situation those basically good Anglo-Saxon working-class folk have been reduced to in today’s U.K.?  Does Dalrymple give the answer?  (Hint:  the fault is not theirs but lies with the interests who are deliberately phasing them out of existence.)