British becoming disillusioned with “diversity”?

“Some people learn things the hard way, and not all of them live in Washington. Our English cousins are getting a brutal lesson in reality: Multiculturalism will kill you if you don’t watch out.

Many of the Muslims in Britain were put out this week when the cops in the West Midlands raided a block of apartments in Birmingham just before dawn and arrested several suspects in the latest London terror bombings. The raids showed “insensitivity” toward Islam, and the authorities, ever eager to improve “community relations” with what Kipling might have called “the lesser breeds without the law,” invited the “moderate” chairman of the Central Birmingham Mosque to participate in a press conference to discuss the raids.

The session had hardly begun before one Dr. Mohammed Naseem began a denunciation of the West, of Britain, of the police and other assorted infidels who had libeled Islam by suggesting that Muslims were in any way responsible for the bombing campaign in London, in which more than 50 men, women and children have died. Prime Minister Tony Blair, he said, is “a liar,” and the security forces are evil. The suspects were merely innocent commuters, and he isn’t interested in hearing about DNA evidence because DNA science “could not be trusted.” Well, of course it can’t, since DNA science was developed after the eighth century, when the prophet set out everything that would ever be known about anything.

The degeneration of the press conference into low comedy, and then into farce, embarrassed only some of the cops. The superintendent of police said Mohammed—the chairman of the mosque, not the prophet himself—was probably suffering from shock brought on by “the unusual events of the last few hours.” This excuse-making was of a piece with the way the British police authorities, perhaps suffering toxic shock themselves, have behaved in the wake of the London atrocities.

The day after the first blasts on July 7, a police deputy rebuked a reporter who asked about the nature of the Islamic threat. “Islam and terrorism,” he said sternly, as if rebuking a child for telling a potty joke, “don’t go together.”

Remarked the London Daily Telegraph yesterday: “When senior police officers go to great lengths to make such prim and dubious politically correct statements, then it is not surprising that Muslim leaders such as [Dr. Mohammed Naseem] end up believing them, and expect to be taken seriously when they take those assertions to their logical conclusions.”

Public opinion in Britain, in fact, appears to be saying enough, already. There’s a growing consensus that the British have been taken for suckers by the Muslim immigration wave that has overwhelmed the sceptr’d isle. The discovery that the suicide bombers of July 7 were homegrown, second-generation Englishmen, first bewildered many, then angered most. The diversity that everyone was encouraged to celebrate turns out to be fatuous, fraudulent and sometimes fatal.

The one-sided celebration of diversity is beginning to grate as well. Julie Burchill, a columnist for the Times of London, notes that “English toddlers are being forced to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid when they are still trying to get their heads about the Easter bunny.”

There’s a sordid creepiness in the way the diversity of even the dead—that Muslims are killed along with everybody else—is celebrated by those who can’t get their own heads around the fact that the Islamic haters hate us simply for taking up space in a world that would otherwise be all theirs, with nobody to complain about the ranting, raping and beheading that is the worship ritual of the radicals.

The real phenomenon of the age of terror is how the “infidels”—the Christians, the Jews and the unbelievers—have kept their cool and their ideals intact in the wake of a rich provocation to retaliate. Few of us in the West necessarily believe the mantra of Tony Blair and George W. Bush that “Islam is a religion of peace” (any more than Messrs. Blair and Bush, despite their huffing and puffing about it, necessarily believe it themselves). But polls here and in Britain consistently show that the majorities are clearheaded about who the villains actually are. It’s a tribute first and last to the enduring power of Jewish ethics and Christian faith that shapes and informs the societies of the West—to which so many millions of Muslims aspire”.

Source

Posted by jonjayray on Saturday, July 30, 2005 at 09:10 AM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (7) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by dan dare on July 30, 2005, 05:42 PM | #

Why do the American media feel it necessary to invent names like the ‘London’ Daily Telegraph and the Times ‘of London’?

You occasionally even see things like the ‘British’ Royal Air Force, and the ‘British’ Royal Navy.

Are their readers such dolts?

2

Posted by Angela on July 30, 2005, 05:53 PM | #

He’s got a point. I’ve been to England a few times since 2002 and I it struck me just how dopey and naive the Poms are.

From what I could see they’ve just given their country away for some deluded reason I didn’t get. As I said to my husband on return, in many ways it was a third world country intent on helping and instructing other second and third world countries. But I didn’t find this when I travelled to the US.

If you want to try and solve this problem you need to get rid of the welfare state and ensure one is only entitled to rights when they are also accountable for breaching those rights. Make it so these people are so busy working to get bread in their mouth that they don’t have time to plan your downfall while living off your taxes (lets face it, they want to kill you all). And if they break the law they get punished, not just a slap on the wrist. This is why the US is better positioned for the future.

Of course, your biggest problem, and why I believe Britain is doomed (ie, just get out if you can) is the propaganda power of the BBC. Basically 99% of the cream of your lower middle and upper working classes left long ago. Good luck.

3

Posted by Matra on July 30, 2005, 10:05 PM | #

Why do the American media feel it necessary to invent names like the ‘London’ Daily Telegraph and the Times ‘of London’?

Because these papers are about as famous in the US as Kiwi or Canadian papers are in the UK! Besides, we all know what “The Times” means in the US.

You occasionally even see things like the ‘British’ Royal Air Force, and the ‘British’ Royal Navy

Lots of countries in Europe and at least two in the Middle East have “royal” in front of national institutions. In Canada we have the Royal Canadian Air Force.

Not only that but few beyond the UK have ever even heard of a Dan Dare badge!

4

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 31, 2005, 12:45 AM | #

Somehow, Angela managed to get through her comment without mentioning race.  It was predictable, of course—women can’t see race.  They don’t know it exists and if you tell them, they won’t believe you.  Despite a letter very appropriately alarmist in tone, in which she said things like “the nation’s doomed” and “get out if you can,” she just couldn’t pinpoint the reason, which is forced race-replacement of the original English population.  Angela will come back to Canada or wherever she lives and in the next election cast her vote with unshakable confidence for the party that wants open borders, because those who want to rectify the open-borders problem are “mean, closed-minded people whom she can’t stand” and because she simply cannot conceive of race-replacement being part of the problem (if she can conceive of race-replacement at all, being a women). 

Little does she suspect (and in vain will others try to tell her), race-replacement is virtually the whole problem.

5

Posted by Angela on July 31, 2005, 04:02 AM | #

Fred,
You’re quite right. In my last paragraph I wrote “Basically 99% of the cream of your lower middle and upper working classes left long ago.” I meant to add that your elites saw fit to make up the numbers with Pakistanis and so on. There view (the elites) was that the departed were lower clas anyway and could be easily replaced. Now we find out if they were correct in that analysis.

6

Posted by Kubilai on July 31, 2005, 10:17 AM | #

Angela, we already know they are incorrect.  However, the more ACCURATE point is, whether correct or not, the government should have an unwavering right to protect its native citizenry despite the fact that some “model minorities” can take up where the natives left off.  THAT is the issue, Angela.

The government (elites) is not a parental unit that decides what is best for the slovenly masses. It is an extension of the will of its people.  Since most people do NOT want race replacement or an influx of genetically distant peoples, the government has become a rogue and hostile entity that needs a harsh reprimand.

7

Posted by Iqbal on August 14, 2005, 03:46 AM | #

It doesn’t help that the so called “moderate” Muslim organisations the UK government is working with often turn out to be more radical underneath:

See eg. http://mcbwatch.blogspot.com/

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: Traditional art now despised in the British art world

Previous entry: A libertarian view of Winnie

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Gwiddskam commented in entry 'Oh for G-d's sake: insane miscegenation propaganda' on 05/23/12, 05:46 PM. (go) (view)

Trofigiogelry commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 03:25 PM. (go) (view)

Industrial Training in Android commented in entry 'Sound principles of money, by Arthur Kitson' on 05/23/12, 02:50 PM. (go) (view)

ovephorie commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 02:41 PM. (go) (view)

Bexserutver commented in entry 'Paranoia at a neck-tie party' on 05/23/12, 01:11 PM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view)

Cogfreero commented in entry 'Obama-speak' on 05/23/12, 12:51 PM. (go) (view)

Cresenewona commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/23/12, 12:50 PM. (go) (view)

Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

bookofratricks.de commented in entry 'Hearing Jonathan Bowden' on 05/23/12, 12:35 PM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view)

UnsefsZetle commented in entry 'More thread wars' on 05/23/12, 12:12 PM. (go) (view)

Endadytexitty commented in entry 'A conversation with Alex Linder' on 05/23/12, 12:08 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view)

Cogfreero commented in entry 'Diversity and moral transformation' on 05/23/12, 11:16 AM. (go) (view)

Mopnoictscoft commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 10:59 AM. (go) (view)

Click here commented in entry 'Christmas is Racist' on 05/23/12, 08:51 AM. (go) (view)

Moilallwriday commented in entry 'Ripples under the White ice' on 05/23/12, 08:43 AM. (go) (view)

SEO Services commented in entry 'The French shooter' on 05/23/12, 08:22 AM. (go) (view)

Joinnamenviaw commented in entry 'Hollywood In Danger of Making Historically Unprecedented Returns From Pro-Euroman Movies' on 05/23/12, 08:15 AM. (go) (view)

Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view)

Teptcrakarp commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 06:31 AM. (go) (view)

terostik commented in entry 'The Human Rights Fraud' on 05/23/12, 06:21 AM. (go) (view)

angemsRag commented in entry 'The Mendacity of the Realist' on 05/23/12, 04:53 AM. (go) (view)

carlos penny commented in entry 'Bankers Swindling the Guarantors of their Reserve Currency' on 05/23/12, 04:36 AM. (go) (view)

abibemume commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 04:33 AM. (go) (view)

Leone Siciliani commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/23/12, 04:27 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view)

angemsRag commented in entry 'The Jewish decade in post-war Poland' on 05/23/12, 02:27 AM. (go) (view)

insaleenvency commented in entry 'British General Election 2010' on 05/23/12, 01:38 AM. (go) (view)

alexaesjiong commented in entry 'Seeking Chinese Nationalist For Majority Radio Guest Spot' on 05/23/12, 12:43 AM. (go) (view)

Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Europe 2015' on 05/23/12, 12:28 AM. (go) (view)

Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'Precious Williams' on 05/23/12, 12:22 AM. (go) (view)

Luxury British Watches commented in entry 'The Bear’s Lair: The immortal Smoot' on 05/22/12, 11:53 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa