Cameras set racial poser on car crime

Posted by onetwothree on May 14, 2006, 08:47 PM | #

Might our masters have discovered a negative side to keeping us under constant surveillance?

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on May 14, 2006, 11:22 PM | #

Obviously,these cameras,being the product of the White devils,are racist in operation.Also,probable racial profiling is occuring,as it is rumored a secret{white invented] computer chip is in play that differentiates the drivers color.I’m not sure what the British equivalent of the ACLU is,but surely one,or more, of their Jew lawyers will use this argument in an upcoming suit.You are not supposed to cite crime rate disparities,when it conflicts with racial demographics.Cheers!

Posted by Nio Zilda on May 15, 2006, 12:03 AM | #

Well, one expects the ‘experts’ to maunder on in sociologese about ‘root causes’ etc. when confronted with higher black crime rates, but at least even in making excuses for them they are admitting that the different crime rates are an objective reality. The story above, however, is just surreal.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on May 15, 2006, 12:28 AM | #

As an aside,I wonder just what porportion of niggers in Briton own cars?If my assumption is correct,then the violation/race “statistic” is even higher.

Posted by Al Ross on May 15, 2006, 01:58 AM | #

So-called ‘root-causes’ will be unearthed and the real cause, which is the unwelcome presence of Afro-Caribbeans in Britain, will remain unacknowledged.

Britain should be reforming its insane welfare provisions and, inter alia, stop all hand-outs to UK citizens and residents who do not qualify as ‘British by descent’.

Similarly, free access to Britain’s overburdened national health service should be limited to real Brits as described above, whilst others should be charged a fee for using our facilities.

In addition we need to alter our laws so that criminals who arent ‘British by descent’ receive longer sentences(followed by deportation) as an additional punishment for insulting the host race by their damaging behaviour.

Posted by Amalek on May 15, 2006, 05:13 AM | #

Sir Paul Condon, one of Sir Ian Blair’s predecessors in the Metrosexopolitan Police Counselling Service, got into hot water in 1995 by admitting that 70-80pc of London muggings were carried out by blacks.

Of course that can no longer be true, thanks to the sensitive approach adopted by pink Plods such as Brian Paddick—in the aftermath of the Martyring of Blessed Stephen Lawrence, by killers known to no court but unerringly identified by the Daily Mail. Allegedly it was Ian Blair’s eagerness to embrace PC for PCs that got him the top job in the Met.

So if only 46pc of car crime is being committed by our coloured cousins, they must have learnt to behave a bit better. Doubtless they responded to the numerous ‘initiatives’ designed to stop them letting down the race by responding inappropriately, if understandably, to the miasma of white hate and prejudice that swirls around them, as detected by Macpherson and his ‘institutional racism’ witch-smellers.

OTOH, in October 2002 Blair, then Deputy Commissioner, told the Evening Standard that ‘most muggers are black’:

Ian Blair said that fear of being branded racist is making it increasingly difficult for police to tackle the problem of muggings.

He admitted that police use of stop-and-search powers created a perception in the black community that it was being targeted disproportionately. But he said the realities of crime could not be ignored, with 63 per cent of mugging victims in London reporting that their attackers were black.

Blair is capable of intermittent spasms of honesty, but we might balk at his solution:

Mr Blair pointed to the American example set by the Reverend Jesse Jackson, the former US presidential candidate. “We need a Jesse Jackson,” he said. “We need someone to say, this is a problem for the community, not just the police.”

All we have in poor old backward Blighty is a Trevor Phillips or a Lee Jasper, who have made good livings out of the racket, but nothing to compare with Je$$e’s haul.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 15, 2006, 02:11 PM | #

As an aside,I wonder just what porportion of niggers in Briton own cars?If my assumption is correct,then the violation/race “statistic” is even higher.

This is the kind of question respectable people never ask.

I remember having a discussion a couple of years ago at SF about whites vs. blacks and mestizos vis-a-vis yobbism.  A white-hater was suggesting (probably inspired by one of Tim “Nice White Fellow” Wise’s pages) that whites are worse drunks and drug-users than blacks and that they cause drunk-driving deaths at a higher rate.

I suggested precisely what you have, that if in fact that was true, the higher SES levels of whites probably contributed to the fact, since whites are more likely to own cars and less likely to carpool   If you live in the American southeast you can’t go an hour without seeing a carful of peanut-heads packed into a hoopdie.

Of course he got all huffy over the suggestion but really, is it so radical an idea that poverty might contribute to lower rates of certain types of crime?  Doing the reverse doesn’t seem to bother liberals.

Though the DoJ’s data show that blacks are more prone to white collar crime than whites, no one suggests they are well-represented at the very highest levels, seeing how no one likes giving a company to a negro to run.

Posted by Ben Tillman on May 15, 2006, 05:21 PM | #

A white-hater was suggesting (probably inspired by one of Tim “Nice White Fellow” Wise’s pages) that whites are worse drunks and drug-users than blacks and that they cause drunk-driving deaths at a higher rate.

Mexicans are by far the worst when it comes to drunk driving.  It’s the Indian blood, I suppose.  And blacks live disproportionately in places where people get around by walking and public transportation, and when they live elsewhere they are, as Svigor suggests, less likely to drive anyway.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 15, 2006, 05:29 PM | #

Mexicans are by far the worst when it comes to drunk driving.  It’s the Indian blood, I suppose.  And blacks live disproportionately in places where people get around by walking and public transportation, and when they live elsewhere they are, as Svigor suggests, less likely to drive anyway.

Yes, mexicans have real problems holding their liquor.  Their low mean IQ and their macho culture don’t help either, nor does their aversion to insurance.

The numbers I’ve read on mestizo drunk driving are ridiculous.

Posted by john on May 16, 2006, 08:27 AM | #

“The numbers I’ve read on mestizo drunk driving are ridiculous”
Maybe that’s why the fat slob kennedy and the recovering alcoholic empathise so much with mexicans.