![]() |
Christians singled outI don’t agree with ANY calls for censorship but the Australian Christian Senator quoted in the excerpt below does highlight the bias against our traditional Western culture that seems to emanate continuously from “The Great and the Good” in our society “Christians are seen as fair game when it comes to poking fun at religious icons, while Jews and Muslims are seemingly off-limits, Family First senator Steve Fielding said on Sunday. The Victorian senator has called for the Federal Government to ban an episode of US cartoon South Park titled “Bloody Mary” for its depiction of the Virgin Mary menstruating. SBS Television has decided to “defer” the airing of the controversial episode, because of the “current worldwide controversy over cartoons of religious figures”. Overseas riots in reaction to newspapers publishing satirical cartoons of the Muslim prophet Mohammed led to the death of nearly 30 people. “How come Christians are such easy targets? How come it’s okay to make fun of symbols at the heart of Christianity, such as the Crucifix or the Virgin Mary, but people seem to think twice before having a go at the Star of David or the Koran?” Senator Fielding said. Posted by jonjayray on Monday, February 27, 2006 at 04:34 AM in Marxism & Culture War Comments:2
Posted by Bo Sears on February 27, 2006, 03:17 PM | # Attacking Christians… We trace the attack on Christian institutions, beliefs, symbols, and values back to 1868 when Heinrich Graetz announced plans “to shatter Christianity.” His plan included “scourging” and “flogging” the majority ethnicity of his host country as well. Without repeating everything our online syllabus explains about efforts “to shatter Christianity,” go to our web site and click on “Glossary” and then on “Graetz Legacy.” www.ResistingDefamation.org 5
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on February 27, 2006, 11:13 PM | # I’m guessing Fielding is a jew? Usually only jews have the balls to mention jews in this context. 6
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on February 27, 2006, 11:14 PM | # Whoops, I see he’s a Christian; I guess I should lump Aussies into the ballsy category more automatically these days… 7
Posted by james on January 11, 2007, 02:41 PM | # Let me just say that whoever runs this website should not even allow articles on Christianity. This is perhaps one of the most un-christian and cruel websites. At least some neo nazi and supremacist groups have the guts to admit what they are and not try to hide it. Jesus was not white, he was a man(son of God) of middle eastern (jewish) descent. Additionally there are many pseudo geneticists posting articles here. What you all need isn’t science, because you will only twist it to serve your purposes, but faith in the love of Jesus. It is the only thing that will soothe the hatred you have within you. 8
Posted by Orion Blue on January 11, 2007, 04:17 PM | # James, you mention that “What you need isn’t science, because you will only twist it to serve your purposes…’ At the risk of belabouring the obvious, it seems only sensible to remember that such luminaries as Stephen Jay Gould, Lewontin, even Alon Ziv, have tended to use science as a scaffold to prop up blatantly ideological platforms and in at least one instance (Gould), the science has been distorted to support an untenable position. Therefore I think it only reasonable to concede that anyone adopting science as a tool of argumentation in support of political conviction is to be expected. What is really telling though, is the fact that only one ideological perspective - the dominant one - is given any credence, though stealthily and deceitfully, whilst opposing views are slandered, distorted and wholly misrepresented. We are even now getting to the stage where certain kinds of scientific inquiry put their researchers at risk of being criminalised or at the very least, made into social pariahs. I don’t see an awful lot of Christian love emanating from the hard-core, radicalised, ideological left, do you? 9
Posted by james on January 11, 2007, 07:08 PM | # This is one of the other problems on the website, while many of the commentators on the site like to engage in seemingly rational debate and like to talk about “free speech” they seem to miss the point that simply because you have the right to hate does not mean that it is morally correct to do so. You may state that I am simpy trying to demonize your point of view, but many of the comments on this site are simply downnright demonic in nature. This site is entirely dedicated to attacking and atttempting to look down upon people of other races. For example look at the article talking about ” The evolution of blond hair and blue eyes among Nordics”, the comments about the article soon turned into attacks on hindus and other people of dark skin color. Many commentators used words like “dirty hindu” and one even directly asserted that he hates democracy and freedom. Others tried to degrade women by insulting their physical features. I am not distorting those comments, they are their for everyone to read. The real problem with many of the people on this website is that while they purport to defend traditional values and christianity they cannot come to terms with the fact that God is the sole originator of diversity. Anyone who is imagining that God created this great diversity among humans so that those who are white could dominate and be superior is seriously misguided. Whether the left can think about love in the midst of their extremely materialistic behavior is beside the point. Like it or not, Jesus talked about God, love, and friendship among men.If being white was so important dont you think that God would have incarnated in a white man instead of becoming the middle eastern Jesus. If you are a christian then God is the ultimate being to emulate. I myself live in a very diverse community and work in poor and diverse neighborhoods. I have often seen that even the poverty stricken and downtrodden dont resent each other because of differences in skin color. The vast majority of diverse neighborhoods that I have been to in California do not have much racial tension, with the exception of the inner cities. I can only hope and pray that like the majority of America you learn to use your intuition to look past skin color. This is the same intuition that leads one to have a belief in God. We must learn to use love to form bonds with our brothers of darker/different skin color. I approach this issue from a christian perspective, if some on this website are not christian I did not mean to offend. 10
Posted by Al Ross on January 11, 2007, 07:40 PM | # Where, in the Bible, do we learn that Jesus wanted to fill Heaven with the sort of Third World anthropoid detritus which today pollutes White countries? 11
Posted by Voice on January 11, 2007, 08:35 PM | # “The real problem with many of the people on this website is that while they purport to defend traditional values and christianity they cannot come to terms with the fact that God is the sole originator of diversity” I do not defend Christianity as a spiritual doctrine, but would only defend it as a means to an end to stop Islamic and Judaic oppression and subjugation. In other words, Christianity has a place in my people’s history and the expression of our genotype(phenotypical expression) but has failed and is failing to awaken euro mans’ racial conciousness(which is an expression of his genes) Traditional European morality does not begin with Christianity. Standing behind Christianity to defend race-replacement of european people(“one must not preach hate when being overran by alien racial stock because they are gods children”)is either ignorance or cowardice. 12
Posted by ben tillman on January 11, 2007, 11:02 PM | # “God is the sole originator of diversity….” Why, then, are you neo-Babelists undoing what He has done? “...but many of the comments on this site are simply downnright demonic in nature.” YOU are the heretic, with your insistence that we receive God’s grace only by committing collective suicide. YOUR position implies that Jesus’s death was meaningless; it did not give us eternal life. But no matter—YOU are the ultimate ingrate. YOUR position is that eternal life is not even a desideratum; in other words, YOU don’t care about Jesus because He was selling something YOU don’t want anyway! Not that He could have delivered, in YOUR view…. YOU think John 3:16 is bullshit: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” YOU are not a Christian. 13
Posted by jimmy brute on January 12, 2007, 09:56 AM | # “This is perhaps one of the most un-christian and cruel websites.” Thus, wanting to preserve your ethny is “cruel” and “un-christian.” Thanks for revealing to us the suicidal Christian mindset, helping to explain why I am no Christian. “Jesus was not white, he was a man(son of God) of middle eastern (jewish) descent.” So, therefore, Jews are Middle Easterns and not white. Well, no argument there. Good luck with that on “The Inverted World”, though. “Additionally there are many pseudo geneticists posting articles here.” Note the adjective “pseudo”, implying “pseudo science.” Can you explain to us what genetic information here is factually incorrect? “What you all need isn’t science, because you will only twist it to serve your purposes, but faith in the love of Jesus. It is the only thing that will soothe the hatred you have within you” Translation: science is bad because it allows man to think for himself and understand reality. You can’t do that. You have to let “priests” explain to you that ethnically-suicidal behavior, based on “faith” and “love” is “God’s will”, and that any attempt to actually use science to understand, objectively, your interests is “hate” and “twisting the science.” Once again, if we are “twisting” science, what here is factually incorrect? “This is one of the other problems on the website, while many of the commentators on the site like to engage in seemingly rational debate and like to talk about “free speech” they seem to miss the point that simply because you have the right to hate does not mean that it is morally correct to do so.” Self-preservation is “hate” and morally incorrect. Ethnic suicide is morally correct. That’s “Christianity.” Note: “seemingly” rational – if there is an error in our rationality, what is it? “You may state that I am simpy trying to demonize your point of view, but many of the comments on this site are simply downnright demonic in nature.” Translation: I’m really not trying to demonize you, yet, you are demonic. “This site is entirely dedicated to attacking and atttempting to look down upon people of other races.” No, only parts of the site are. “For example look at the article talking about “ The evolution of blond hair and blue eyes among Nordics”, the comments about the article soon turned into attacks on hindus and other people of dark skin color. Many commentators used words like “dirty hindu” and one even directly asserted that he hates democracy and freedom. Others tried to degrade women by insulting their physical features. I am not distorting those comments, they are their for everyone to read.” I assume you meant “there.” Well, I’ve tried to explain to the powers-that-be here that these sorts of posts/threads are going to backfire, because preservation doesn’t need to require “proving” to others differences in attractiveness, etc. That’s a lost cause, though. “The real problem with many of the people on this website is that while they purport to defend traditional values and christianity….” To hell with Christianity – that’s your fetish, not mine. “…they cannot come to terms with the fact that God is the sole originator of diversity. Anyone who is imagining that God created this great diversity among humans so that those who are white could dominate and be superior is seriously misguided.” Most on this site are not interested in “domination” or “superiority” but in survival. And if “God” is the “sole originator of diversity”, one wonders if this god is going to be thrilled with the destruction of diversity through enforced mingling and panmictic miscegenation. “ The vast majority of diverse neighborhoods that I have been to in California do not have much racial tension, with the exception of the inner cities.” Of course, the most “diverse” and “downtrodden” neighborhoods in California are in the inner cities, where racial hostility and race violence is common, with a low level civil war between Blacks and Hispanics. “I can only hope and pray that like the majority of America you learn to use your intuition to look past skin color.” Translation: race is nothing other than skin color; “intuition” is better than reason, because using your “God-given gift of reason” may lead to the “wrong” conclusion – so just depend on your feelings! “This is the same intuition that leads one to have a belief in God.” Well, sure, if you are going to eschew facts and reason, you can believe in just about anything. “We must learn to use love to form bonds with our brothers of darker/different skin color.” ‘If everyone is my brother, then I have no brother’ – Proudhun “I approach this issue from a christian perspective, if some on this website are not christian I did not mean to offend.” Not offended, bemused. 14
Posted by Dr. alotaibi on December 17, 2008, 05:06 AM | # Dear friends and brothers in humanity , We should know first of all that we have not created our selves so that we go on arguing unnecessarily and discriminatingly . We have no choice . we have been created as we are now . No one can deny , even the idiot. We can not change ourselves as we like . No way . Now I want to come to the conclusion that being created without our will or our wish by God or some people may believe that nature has created them , as if they were present during that creation . People do argue and shake their heads grumblingly or doing grunting . Next entry: The evolution of blond hair and blue eyes among Nordics Previous entry: Guyana’s future Equality Minister to sue Whitehall departments |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/21/12, 04:46 AM. (go) (view) HA Creams commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/21/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) property management fort lauderdale commented in entry 'Demography challenge' on 05/21/12, 04:06 AM. (go) (view) alex commented in entry 'Just before the Golden Dawn: Two American White Nationalists on holiday in Greece - Part 1' on 05/21/12, 03:12 AM. (go) (view) Leah commented in entry 'Just before the Golden Dawn: Two American White Nationalists on holiday in Greece - Part 1' on 05/21/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) alex commented in entry 'Starvation to keep the masses on a leash' on 05/21/12, 03:02 AM. (go) (view) Leah commented in entry 'Starvation to keep the masses on a leash' on 05/21/12, 03:01 AM. (go) (view) air jordan commented in entry 'Just before the Golden Dawn: Two American White Nationalists on holiday in Greece - Part 1' on 05/21/12, 02:25 AM. (go) (view) air jordan commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/21/12, 02:21 AM. (go) (view) air jordan commented in entry 'A Possible Explanation for the Flynn Effect' on 05/21/12, 02:19 AM. (go) (view) air jordan commented in entry 'The Boer genocide' on 05/21/12, 02:16 AM. (go) (view) air jordan commented in entry 'Just before the Golden Dawn: Two American White Nationalists on holiday in Greece - Part 3' on 05/21/12, 02:14 AM. (go) (view) tuttcoavore commented in entry 'The Boer genocide' on 05/21/12, 02:08 AM. (go) (view) best golf sunglasses commented in entry 'The Boer genocide' on 05/21/12, 02:06 AM. (go) (view) baogejianb commented in entry 'Music, freedom, revolution' on 05/21/12, 01:15 AM. (go) (view) Offelfrof commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/21/12, 01:11 AM. (go) (view) insaleenvency commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/21/12, 12:37 AM. (go) (view) baogejianb commented in entry 'Music, freedom, revolution' on 05/20/12, 11:48 PM. (go) (view) rhypsustott commented in entry 'Were the original Indo-Europeans from Europe, Asia or India?' on 05/20/12, 11:35 PM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 11:17 PM. (go) (view) assundaGymn commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/20/12, 10:41 PM. (go) (view) sedofleenly commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/20/12, 10:32 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:31 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:27 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:22 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:13 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:12 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 10:09 PM. (go) (view) pletcherzxy commented in entry 'ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT: Government's Own Data Point to a Cost-Effective Strategy' on 05/20/12, 09:50 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/20/12, 09:42 PM. (go) (view) Haiseelo commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 09:05 PM. (go) (view) advansarl commented in entry 'Latest Link' on 05/20/12, 08:56 PM. (go) (view) Haiseelo commented in entry 'Why Only Fourteen Words?' on 05/20/12, 07:42 PM. (go) (view) Haiseelo commented in entry 'A Possible Explanation for the Flynn Effect' on 05/20/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) indian strategy commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle' on 05/20/12, 05:17 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Al Ross on February 27, 2006, 05:46 AM | #
The Left wont like the message of this particular South Park episode because it deals with alcoholism and debunks the ‘disease’ theory, highlighting instead the necessity for drinkers to exercise self-control and personal responsibility. The religious shamans will also find it unpalatable, not only because of any so-called blasphemy but also because many of them claim that their deity can assist a ‘victim of alcoholism’ in ‘overcoming the disease’ in the manner popularised by President Bush.