Die Juden sind unser Unglück

Posted by Alaric on January 16, 2012, 03:46 AM | #

Rainy weather is a misfortune. Jews aren’t.

Wrong attitude.

Posted by Jovlang on January 16, 2012, 05:55 AM | #

Please increase the quality of posts on here, to prevent scaring away potential converts.

Posted by Lurker on January 16, 2012, 06:47 AM | #

Please increase the quality of posts on here, to prevent scaring away potential converts.

A perennial issue. I often imagine a new visitor perhaps on the verge of waking up and ends up here at MR. But then scampers away in fright, back to the safe PC world, at the use of certain words and terms.

Is the site intended to bring people into the fold or just preach to the converted?

Posted by Englander on January 16, 2012, 07:59 AM | #

IMO the entries of J Richards (and to a lesser extent Soren Renner) are what make it tough to consider directing members of ‘The Unwoken’ to this blog.

I think Dan simply wishes to provoke discussion of the Jewish Question. If you follow his posts and understand his views you’ll know the context in which this entry should be taken.

Posted by Helvena on January 16, 2012, 08:04 AM | #

@ Englander.  I disagree.  J.R, S.R, Captainchaos and others are honest and that is exactly what the unwoken crave.  If honesty wasn’t dangerous the Jews wouldn’t be liars.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 16, 2012, 09:41 AM | #

There are two ways to deal with Jewry. Confrontation or neutralization.

The former involves developing some plausible narrative of Jewish menace or malfeasance by which it is hoped whites will grow enraged at Jews and either expel them from white lands (as happened innumerable times historically), or prevent their entry into certain influential professions, so that they can be controlled, and their ontological dangerousness thereby contained. Ostensibly, in practice this means reiterating the narrative constantly across all information vectors in the hope that eventually whites will ‘awaken’, and, if accompanied with muscular demonstrations of white unity and counter-Semitic strength to give physical fence-sitters the needed dose of courage, positive white EGI change will follow.

The latter offers a very different view of both the problem and the solution. Neutralizers likewise see Jewry as a threat to white EGI, but not always or even primarily a malicious one. They recognize that Jews, unlike blacks or Muslims, are capable of full structural (if not psychological) integration into white societies, and that this represents an opportunity as well as a danger. The danger is that ordinary whites, with their innate individualist bias, are unable to perceive the existential threat that Jewry poses (as against the easily recognized problems associated with at least some of the visibly distinct alien groups: crime with blacks, terrorism with Muslims) - which is that Jewish intelligence, talent, determination, professional competitiveness, and ethnic nepotism seemingly ineluctably lead white societies along historical paths they would not otherwise go, and worse, which usually harm white EGI in the long run. Moreover, Jewish structural assimilation means that Jews frequently make real, easily discernible contributions to white societies, as well as to individual whites. These positive contributions made by Jews as individuals then mask, at least for individualist-oriented whites, the macro-harm Jewry so predictably inflicts on white nations.

The nature of the problem calls forth its own response. In dealing with blacks, we must be strong. But in dealing with Jews, we must be crafty.

The opportunity that Jewish structural assimilation presents is twofold. First, though Jewish ethnocentrism has hitherto been a wholly negative influence on white EGI, it is not impossible to imagine successful alliances with Jews, considered now as stakeholders in formerly white-dominant nations, for mutual protection against the depredations, physical and fiscal, of racial aliens. Second, and more important, whereas the racial conflict with other alien groups is one of physical (military and/or other force, or numerical/electoral) domination, with Jewry it is psychological. Outside of Israel, Jews lack physical as well as demographic power. Thus one can neutralize the Jewish threat simply as a concurrent, epiphenomenal effect of a positive approach to building up white ethnocentrism. To neutralize the Jews, one need not engage in tactically and possibly even strategically problematic anti-Semitism. Neutralizing Jewry occurs automatically as a function of developing white identity, which can be done through activism focusing on non-Jewish, nonwhite threats to white EGI - possibly even while enlisting some Jews in this anti-nonwhite-depredation activism.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 16, 2012, 10:48 AM | #

Helvena: If honesty wasn’t dangerous the Jews wouldn’t be liars.

I love it! Just as I love the photo and its message: “Women and girls, the Jews are your defilers!”

Who, at this late date, can remain unimpressed by its prescience?

Posted by anon on January 16, 2012, 11:07 AM | #

I often imagine a new visitor perhaps on the verge of waking up and ends up here at MR. But then scampers away in fright, back to the safe PC world

I did that. Came back when i was ready.

Posted by Selous Scout on January 16, 2012, 11:38 AM | #

BTW…

Happy MLK day!!

Posted by Søren Renner on January 16, 2012, 11:42 AM | #

A spectre is haunting MR: the shadow of Geoff Beck!

Posted by Dan Dare on January 16, 2012, 12:26 PM | #

Yea verily, He hath arisen!

Posted by Lurker on January 16, 2012, 01:03 PM | #

I looked at that old thread - seems funny to think JJR was ever posting here.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 16, 2012, 01:44 PM | #

Lurker: I looked at that old thread - seems funny to think JJR was ever posting here.

He left before my arrival. In perusing the 2005 thread, there was a point at which I wondered if he was not an earlier incarnation of “Leon Haller”.

Posted by dc on January 16, 2012, 02:13 PM | #

There are three issues which must be carefully distinguished otherwise no sensible discussion is possible.

First, being a White Nationalist automatically entails being in sympathy with the programme of the National Socialist party. If there is any doubt on this score, I suggest reviewing “The 25 Points” as presented, for example, by Gottfried Feder. One might also reconsider William Joyce and A. N. Field. The programme represents nothing more than plain common sense. The difficulty lies in establishing an analogous, broader programme addressed to the European people of N. America, Australia and Europe. We are being deliberately set up for a choice between multiple race wars or extinction. It is not out of place to remember the (jew?) dictum, War is the jew’s harvest.

As far as this goes I am happy to declare myself a National Socialist.

The second issue is the problem of firmly separating the programme and reality from historical externals (so the uniforms, endless marching, with swastikas everywhere). To my mind, such as it is, there is no escaping the need to fight down and destroy the bogeyman of wartime propaganda. We are already comicbook Nazis in jew propaganda, and in the minds of the unthinking masses of our fellow Europeans. To some degree it is pointless to try to escape the label, but it must be modified: ‘Nazis? How do you mean? We are neither yobbos nor fanatical flag wavers. Nor do we wish to become ersatz Germans of 80 years ago.’

The third issue is how to cope with the jews, their power and their programme. This must be faced, until we do we are at the mercy of endless economic manipulation, and endless media charades paraded as reality. What was done to Libya can just as easily be done to any state, including Britain and the US. The only remedy which I can see, is hammering away relentlessly until the facade of lies collapses. Gold standard, holocaust, WTC, Bolshevism, ... one after the other they must be exposed, until jew has no option except to decamp.

And Dan Dare, I do hope you spent a few minutes actually reading Treitschke. Perhaps you could reflect that for two and a half centuries the script has been repeated in the US, in France, in Germany, in Russia, in England, and there is no change whatsoever. Or should that have been, “after two and a half millenia”? We all know the line, Call a dog a dirty name and he’ll live up to it. After all this time perhaps we should consider the possibility that the name is deserved.

Posted by danielj on January 16, 2012, 02:30 PM | #

First, though Jewish ethnocentrism has hitherto been a wholly negative influence on white EGI, it is not impossible to imagine successful alliances with Jews

Wow! That is a fucking impressive amount of cognitive dissonance! Even for you. I’m afraid, Leoniwitzabergstein, that is is impossible for the normal MR poster to imagine anything resembling an alliance between Jews and Whites.

Perhaps you could reflect that for two and a half centuries the script has been repeated in the US, in France, in Germany, in Russia, in England, and there is no change whatsoever.

Portugal, Poland, the Ukraine, HUNGARY, Holland, Spain, et al.

I did that. Came back when i was ready.

And we’re glad to have you!

What’s to discuss? To start with, how to get these vermin out of our countries.

Is this discussion a black tie affair? Will there be fifty-dollar-a-plate dinners? Who’s catering?

Posted by danielj on January 16, 2012, 02:41 PM | #

To neutralize the Jews, one need not engage in tactically and possibly even strategically problematic anti-Semitism.

Fuck. This is almost as bad as the last one…

Any organization that is not explicitly counter-semitic will INVARIABLY end up philo-semitic. Do I really need to provide examples?

Leon Haller is a mischling. I rest my case.

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 16, 2012, 03:08 PM | #

Leon Haller is a mischling. I rest my case.

What’s to discuss? To start with, how to get these vermin out of our midst?

My concern is not that newcomers will visit this site and be frightened off, but that they will lurk in an effort to untangle the endlessly labyrinthine obfuscation on display, only to leave later in a state of hopeless bewilderment.

Posted by Søren Renner on January 16, 2012, 04:57 PM | #

BEHOLD! THE BEWILDERBEAST LEAVETH NONE UNTANGLED NOT ONE!

Posted by MOB on January 16, 2012, 05:15 PM | #

Americans have a perfect opportunity right now to address the Jewish Problem VERY LEGITIMATELY.

They have only to join together and FIGHT the OUTRAGEOUS Jewish / Israeli intrusion into their election process.

Right Now!  Mitt Romney’s intimate association with Netanyahu and the Bain intelligence agent (spy) from Israel who Romney actually put on his transition team.  I’ve posted articles and VNN has posted videos; I’m sure there is more out there.

How can people not be OUTRAGED that Netanyahu feels perfectly entitled to actively involve himself and his Jews and Israelis in another country’s election?

If there was such a thing as an American nationalist movement, there would be groups from 2 to however many ACTIVELY distributing and ranting about this stuff in as many mainstream and political forums as they could manage.

All grassroots movements start someplace.  A dozen years ago I suggested a grassroots movement against aid to Israel.  Nothing came of it.  Someplace a determined effort against something has to begin and take root.

Posted by neo-Truthite on January 16, 2012, 07:05 PM | #

Maybe “unhappiness” is a better translation of “Unglück” in this context.

Posted by Lew on January 16, 2012, 07:13 PM | #

The National Socialists were right about Jews, and, quite frankly, I don’t trust anyone who claims to be on our side who is not a least a little sympathetic to them. I especially don’t trust anyone who has criticizes NS more than Jews.

Posted by Guest Lurker on January 16, 2012, 08:48 PM | #

The National Socialists were right about Jews, and, quite frankly, I don’t trust anyone who claims to be on our side who is not a least a little sympathetic to them. I especially don’t trust anyone who has criticizes NS more than Jews

Let alone so-called nationalists, usually of Anglo provenance, who like to claim that Hitler and the nazis were jews or Rothschild agents working for the jew’s interests. On some psychological level these types probably think it exculpates them from having helped destroy a perfectly decent and honorable white nation.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 16, 2012, 09:00 PM | #

Everybody who moves “west” from the conventional absorbing of mainstream views has, at some point, to deal with the JQ.  Jewish power and ethno-centrism are facts.  We don’t all deal with them in the same way.  The VNN way is not mine and I suspect that it will not remain Geoff’s.  As a general guide to what I think, I will say that the manner in which Western societies treat their Jews is a measure of their civilisation (likewise of Jewry the manner in which organised Jewry treats its host).

I believe we, as a society, need a cool, balanced view of the JQ out of which some progress - for us - may emerge.

(Guessedworker)

I believe that, too.

Very wise words from a half dozen years ago.

The ideal prince combines both leonine and vulpine qualities, and employs one or the other set of traits as the times and causes merit. We don’t absolutely need to be righteous fools. There is no victory save victory, however it be achieved.

——————————————————————————-

He left before my arrival. In perusing the 2005 thread, there was a point at which I wondered if he was not an earlier incarnation of “Leon Haller”. (Marr)

No, that was not me. I have never published anything here except under my name, and in other venues, I have only used aliases when my own name got me banned (for my staunch advocacy on behalf of our race and the 14 words, btfw you various ingrates! Really, to take fire from the enemy is expected, but from one’s alleged fellow-fighters ...).

———————————————————————————

Leon Haller is a mischling (danielj)

A scurrilous and defamatory outrage. I am 100% Nordic, pal. Half-Protestant, half-Catholic (but baptized, confirmed, etc in the Church of Rome). Not a drop of Med or Slav, let alone Jew, or nonwhite. Not even any Celtic. Just a Norseman (OK, a bit of Northern French, but that side is blonde, too - Charlemagne? Brigitte Bardot?).

Anyway, I don’t think you’ve grasped my position at all.

———————————————————————————

My concern is not that newcomers will visit this site and be frightened off, but that they will lurk in an effort to untangle the endlessly labyrinthine obfuscation on display, only to leave later in a state of hopeless bewilderment. (Marr)

This site, insofar as I understand its owner’s intention, is not for newcomers, but for seasoned nationalists to engage in hoped-for high level discussions to advance the nationalist intellectual paradigm. There ought to be sites for newcomers, ones which patiently make the case for the reality of white victimization and the need for measures to ensure white preservation in a forensically moderate and morally responsible manner. I don’t believe that MR was set up to be that type of venue.

———————————————————————————

The National Socialists were right about Jews, and, quite frankly, I don’t trust anyone who claims to be on our side who is not a least a little sympathetic to them. I especially don’t trust anyone who has criticizes NS more than Jews. (Lew)

The Nazis were virulently overwrought wrt the Jews. They would have gotten farther if they had avoided the hyperbolic rhetoric, and focused instead on soberly laying out the case for why Jewry ought to be relocated to its own country, and forbidden in Euro lands. I agree in disliking “conservatives” who feel compelled always to hysterically denounce Nazis, especially when they aren’t evenhanded wrt recognizing the plain fact of the much greater world damage inflicted by the Bolsheviks, the true enemies of all mankind. Indeed, I don’t even like that old ‘evenhandedness’ in discussing the alleged “twin totalitarianisms” (older readers may have a better idea of what I’m referring to, and its rhetorical extent in the not so distant past).

The Nazis are not the answer to the problems facing Euroman, but I fear they will be if whites en masse don’t wake up soon and return to their traditional understandings of man and society. The reckless liberals are, in a sense, narrowing our eventual racial-ideological choices. Before too much longer, all that will be left is NSM or extinction.

The West, in its unbelievable racial fatuity, is, I think, effectively if hardly intentionally, working its way back to Hitler.

Posted by danielj on January 17, 2012, 12:24 AM | #

Anyway, I don’t think you’ve grasped my position at all.

I don’t think you’ve grasped the White Nationalist position at all.

Do you really truly not see the contradictions in your logic as pointed out by me above?

Posted by Dan Dare on January 17, 2012, 02:04 AM | #

Of course, as several contributors have noted, the Jews are our misfortune, so what’s to discuss?

Well, the point to be discussed is not whether or not that proposition is true, but whether the JQ in general is something which should consume quite so much of the intellectual and psychic energy of as many contributors to this vehicle as it does.

I would suggest not. The Jew obsession is unhealthy and counter-prouctive as well as being essentially irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of European-descended people who don’t happen to live in the United States.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 17, 2012, 02:24 AM | #

The Jew obsession is unhealthy and counter-prouctive as well as being essentially irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of European-descended people who don’t happen to live in the United States. (Dan Dare)

Yes, absolutely. It isn’t healthy for most Americans, either. The way to deal with the threat is via “neutralization” (see my comment above), not endless confrontation. Whites are too individualist in our psychological (and hence ethical) outlook; too many have Jewish friends, liked co-workers and professional contacts, and even family members; the threat itself is way too abstract for average persons to be able to grasp.

WNs should focus on race because that threat is both more substantial and physically real, as well as visible and easily understood. We can make progress there. As we do so, concurrently building up white pride and ethnoconsciousness, the JQ gets gradually pushed to one side, without our ever having actually to have done anything about it (and thus avoiding all those messy Holocaust and Nazi references; or better, when the cries of “Nazi” are hurled at mere immigration restrictionists, gun rights supporters, death penalty advocates, etc, such forensic injustice redounds to our favor - and will more so as time passes, and race and PC-exhaustion set in across the West).

Posted by Dan Dare on January 17, 2012, 02:44 AM | #

In my view, the most productive attitude to take in public on the JQ, for Euro-nationalist cadre of whatever stripe, is one of studied indifference. What gets discussed in private, amongst the cognoscenti, is another matter entirely.

Posted by danielj on January 17, 2012, 09:52 AM | #

Based upon the Alexa rating I’d say that MR qualifies as private and if we all took IQ tests I’m sure we’d all qualify as cognescenti.

Posted by Dan Dare on January 17, 2012, 11:20 AM | #

Based upon the Alexa rating I’d say that MR qualifies as private and if we all took IQ tests I’m sure we’d all qualify as cognescenti.

Quite so.

And likely to become even more so if it continues along its present trajectory.

But half a mo’ - you don’t thing that could be deliberate do you? Nah, couldn’t be. Right?

Posted by Santos on January 17, 2012, 12:03 PM | #

The NS had the appropriate answer, intellectually, academically, practically. Anyhting short of NS and their racial policies can not even remotely approach to a resolution of the racial issues in Europe. The problem with the NS in their 12 year rule was that they were not thorough and hard enough to combat the mortal-eternal enemy. They were soft. How does one explain that after the war, following the accussation that the NS extripated european chosen at its roots wherever they went, almost 90% of political leaders in each european nation was chosen ridden ?? Mendez France- Bruno Kreisky, Ulbricht,Gomulka, Kadar, Schuman,  to name only a minority few rose into prominence and quickly assumed dominant and leading roles in a devastated Europe.
The solution going forward is the resurgence of NS ; anyhting short of racial politics is certainly doomsday for the European man. Europe rose and shaped itself around race; it can only survive by upholding racial principles. Globalization, miscegeneation, immigration, corruption, financial skulduggery, deracination, PC, antiracism; these are gross ammunitions in the arsenal to destroy Europe and confine it to the dustbin of history. One can not survive by defensive retreat. Racial politics needs to be revived ; it shall not be revived with the present status quo of democracy , mass migration, open borders, rampant officially stimulated miscegeneation and the devaluation of traditional principles.

Posted by danielj on January 17, 2012, 01:11 PM | #

What are you suggesting Dan?

Is it that Jews are secretly conspiring to destroy MR?

Posted by Robert Reis on January 17, 2012, 01:14 PM | #

The Irish Savant

Monday, 16 January 2012
My transition
I’ve been blogging for five years now. My God, how time flies. As has been pointed out to me on countless occasions by Jewish friends and colleagues, ex-friends and former colleagues, the site has gone from being Judophile (I dreamt of 100,000 black and Muslim immigrants to Ireland being replaced by 100,000 Jews) to what many, incorrectly, call anti-Semitism. Representing it graphically, X axis being positivity towards Jews, Y axis amount of research undertaken, it would show a 45 degree reduction from top to bottom. Throughout this time I’ve endured some sleepless nights as existing certainties were undermined, as were long-standing friendships.

A constant, and genuine (in my opinion) response to my position has been along the lines of ‘look, every Jewish person has within him the subliminal fear that our millennia of persecution could be reactivated at any time.’ Now I’ve yet to hear a single acknowledgement that maybe, just maybe, some aspect of Jewish behaviour might, just possibly, have contributed, in some little way, to the unreasonable behaviour of their hosts. And that’s the point of this post.

Essentially I’m asking, if you fear us so much and want to avoid antagonising us, why do you (it seems to me) do everything in your power to attack and denigrate us? It’s not just towering minds such as Boaz, Marx, Freud etc. who established the ‘architecture’ of white destruction (see my long explanatory post here). I’m talking about everyday activity that we see all around us.

I could write 100 pages worth of examples but I’ll list just a few. Take the attack on Christmas. This most treasured of white cultural celebrations has been under relentless Jewish-lead attack for generations. By now you even have to be careful if you refer to ‘Christmas’ at all, or where you erect a Christmas tree in public. Yet it’s fine to have a giant brightly-lit Hanukah menorah in front of the White House. Any poor idiot who pointed out this obvious unfairness would be torn to shreds by the MSM (Jewish controlled) and the various components of the anti-Semitism industry such as the ADL, $PLC etc.

What about the egregious Tim Wise with his ‘tick tock’ countdown, celebrating the impending obliteration of white America? I’m not feeling the love, Tim. And have you noticed how the state of Iowa was attacked, slandered and denigrated in the MSM when Iowans looked like giving Ron Paul a plurality. Arthur Sultzerburger, owner of the New York Times had this to say: “Iowa has long been criticized as too much of an outlier to be permanently endowed such an outsize influence in shaping the presidential field. Too small, critics say. Too rural. Too white.” He didn’t say who it has been ‘criticized’ by, but he need look no further than his own paper where a mini-army of Jewish writers conducted an on-going assault.

And now another Jewish writer at the Slimes, Lee Siegel, has opened up the attack on Mitt Romney, presumably because he looks like a white candidate who could beat their treasured Obama. He doesn’t like the Romney family, because of their whiteness, basically. Get this: Romney’s whiteness is grounded ‘in a retro vision of the country, one of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed to work hard for corporate America.’

Can you credit that?

He despises Romney because he represents a country of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed to work hard! Maybe he prefers today’s America of Detroit, Camden and numerous other black-run (I use that term advisedly) cities, where a semblance of order is maintained only by the presence of the National Guard? An America with a permanent black welfare class, a disappearing middle class (read ‘white’), flash mobs, mass unemployment, a plummeting dollar, a disappearing manufacturing base, and with its disappearance jobs for all those fathers unashamed to work hard for corporate America?

You know, it seems to me that that is exactly what he, and his ilk, would prefer.

So to my remaining Jewish friends and colleagues I say to you: This is bloody strange way of forestalling a recurrence of historical anti-Semitism. What the hell are you playing at?

I yield the floor…….
Posted by SAVANT at 21:08 40 comments

Posted by Silver on January 17, 2012, 01:20 PM | #

The National Socialists were right about Jews

There once was a man named Lew
Who reduced everything to the Jew
He went hell for leather
And didn’t care whether
Anything that he said wasn’t true

Sorry to recycle that one, but “Lew” was just too perfect.

Now look here, just what the hell were the nutzis (at that point in time) so right about?  They were premier world-haters, every bit as bad as the worst of the talmudic yids.  Had they been more reasonable and, above all more patient, they could have had virtually everything they wanted and probably not even had to go to war to get it.  But noooooo, they were so coked up on fantasies of being aryan supermen they had to have it all right now.  Well, they tried and they lost. Bad luck for them, but even worse, bad luck for anyone who cares about racial belonging.

Posted by MOB on January 17, 2012, 01:43 PM | #

Robert Reis at #33

And now another Jewish writer at the Slimes, Lee Siegel, has opened up the attack on Mitt Romney, presumably because he looks like a white candidate who could beat their treasured Obama. He doesn’t like the Romney family, because of their whiteness, basically. Get this: Romney’s whiteness is grounded ‘in a retro vision of the country, one of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed to work hard for corporate America.’  Can you credit that?  He despises Romney because he represents a country of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed to work hard! Maybe he prefers today’s America of Detroit, Camden and numerous other black-run (I use that term advisedly) cities, where a semblance of order is maintained only by the presence of the National Guard? An America with a permanent black welfare class, a disappearing middle class (read ‘white’), flash mobs, mass unemployment, a plummeting dollar, a disappearing manufacturing base, and with its disappearance jobs for all those fathers unashamed to work hard for corporate America?  So to my remaining Jewish friends and colleagues I say to you: This is bloody strange way of forestalling a recurrence of historical anti-Semitism. What the hell are you playing at?  I yield the floor…….
Posted by SAVANT

In fact, Jews are bankrolling Romney (and Gingrich) over Obama, since they have for several years already distrusted and been dissatisfied with Obama’s insufficiently rabid devotion to Israel.

Posted by Lew on January 17, 2012, 01:47 PM | #

I don’t believe they were right about everything just that they were right about Jews. Nor did I say everything reduces to the Jew.

Posted by Dan Dare on January 17, 2012, 01:49 PM | #

Now now Silver, fair do’s.

The Nahtzees did after all succeed in topping six (or so) millions of the Auld Enemy, or so the story goes. That fifty-odd million so of their co-racials - including seven million other Krauts - also went up the chimney (figuratively speaking) has to be viewed as unfortunate, but inevitable, collateral damage, a necessary investment in healthy racial politics, if you like.

Means and ends, old boy.

Posted by anon on January 17, 2012, 01:59 PM | #

Representing it graphically, X axis being positivity towards Jews, Y axis amount of research undertaken, it would show a 45 degree reduction from top to bottom. Throughout this time I’ve endured some sleepless nights as existing certainties were undermined, as were long-standing friendships.

If you argue about immigration a lot online you’ll find almost all the real opposition comes from Jews. Always. You could start out completely neutral towards them but once you start noticing the unconscious references to Israel and Jewishness and the the constant lying, deceit, attempts to bully and silence that makes up their tactics it starts to become overwhelmingly obvious that Jews are engaged in fully conscious genocidal ethnic warfare. There is no doubt of it. Then once you research a bit it becomes even more plain.

The only real question is if it’s “The Jews” or just some Jews and what percentage are actively and consciously engaged in this genocidal enterprise and how many are simply products of their 3000 years of inbreeding combined with their deliberately induced paranoia.

My guess is
- bankster element: they didn’t like being chased out of Germany after they destroyed the German economy in the 1920s so they’ve been using political funding to bribe politicians into allowing mass immigration into the west as an insurance policy againt the inevitable backlash once they’ve finished sucking the last drop of blood out of the dollar. it’s just business to them

- consciously genocidal element: if you take their definition of neo-nazi and apply it to them i’d guess maybe 10% or so, enough to fill all the the Jewish hate groups like the ADL and SPLC

- most of the rest: massively inbred, emotionally barely human, instinctively hostile, hate-filled and paranoid on a scale of 1 through 10 where the 10s overlap with the neos

- few: lots of white blood, neutral

Posted by anon on January 17, 2012, 02:13 PM | #

MOB

In fact, Jews are bankrolling Romney (and Gingrich) over Obama, since they have for several years already distrusted and been dissatisfied with Obama’s insufficiently rabid devotion to Israel.

They’re increasingly split imo. There’s still a lot supporting Obama, particularly the media crowd but as you say the neocon and bankster factions are leaning Romney. The banksters supported Obama before but i think they’re switching now because they need some small countries bombed to stem the tide of countries switching from using the dollar as reserve currency.

ps those pictures you linked of Romney looking like a condemned man were interesting. do you think he might be homosexual?

Posted by Guest Lurker on January 17, 2012, 02:56 PM | #

Dan Dare wrote:

The Nahtzees did after all succeed in topping six (or so) millions of the Auld Enemy, or so the story goes. That fifty-odd million so of their co-racials - including seven million other Krauts - also went up the chimney (figuratively speaking) has to be viewed as unfortunate, but inevitable, collateral damage, a necessary investment in healthy racial politics, if you like.

Means and ends, old boy.

Didn’t that have something to do with the French and English being first to declare war on Germany over Poland? A Poland that at first was split between the Soviets and the Germans,  where the English and French failed to declare war on the Soviets, but rather allied with them to destroy the Germans and then proceed to hand over that very same Poland whose freedom they supposedly cared so much about over to the bolsheviks?

Of course, being a perfidious Englishman with the typical English bug up his ass about the Germans, you would ignore that part.

Posted by Dan Dare on January 17, 2012, 03:17 PM | #

Been there, done that, got the T-shirt

Posted by anon on January 17, 2012, 03:26 PM | #

Hitler only got 4% of the vote in 1928 and almost 40% in 1932 so whether perfidious or nutzi i’d suggest the primary cause of WWII was something that happened between those two dates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

Posted by MOB on January 17, 2012, 03:48 PM | #

MOB-
ps those pictures you linked of Romney looking like a condemned man were interesting. do you think he might be homosexual?

Thanks for my first burst of laughter in several days.  Hilarious!

It’s been fascinating to sit in on the way men think these last dozen years, and often very rewarding.  Their in-depth knowledge of many things is truly impressive; their desire and ability to carry on sustained discussions of substance is enviable.  But their thoughts on women are dramatically wrong-headed, in the sense of continuously judging and misjudging the character, the intentions, and the actions of women.

As a female, I’ve been surprised to discover the extent to which men’s perceptual framework is apparently dominated by sex.  I’m not criticizing—if that’s how men are constructed, then that’s how they’re constructed.  I’m just saying what a surprise it has been to find how MUCH of men’s thought contains sex as an ever-present element.

As to Romney’s pictures, I did find them to be most revealing; however, whether he’s homosexual or not didn’t enter my thoughts - you must be an anonymous male.  : )

Posted by Jimmy Marr on January 17, 2012, 04:39 PM | #

MOB: ...what a surprise it has been to find how MUCH of men’s thought contains sex as an ever-present element.

What is surprising to me is the amount of money, from mendacious elite sources, that has gone into the willful distortion of this ubiquitous tendency (i.e. support of pornography, homosexuality and feminism).

Until recently, my avoidance of Jew propaganda had prevented me from reading Cruel Hoax, but I’ve found that by allowing for the exculpation of Jews, and exploitation of the conditioned response to National Socialism, its been very helpful to my understanding of this issue.

Posted by Hot Carl on January 17, 2012, 04:54 PM | #

ps those pictures you linked of Romney looking like a condemned man were interesting. do you think he might be homosexual?

I’m just saying what a surprise it has been to find how MUCH of men’s thought contains sex as an ever-present element.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT19MJERShg

Posted by Helvena on January 17, 2012, 05:25 PM | #

And this applies to the United States today:

A rabbi of Czernovitz, Dr. Manfred Reifer, summed up the situation of his race with great insight in 1933.
“...The German Jews fed themselves on false hope, overlooked reality, dreamed of cosmopolitanism, of the time of Lessing and Mendelssohn. And this expressed itself in two ways; either they became Liberals, or they became the standard-bearers of Socialism. Both fields of activity furnished new food to anti-Semitism.
“In all good faith, to serve themselves and humanity, the Jews began to reach actively into the life of the German people. We trusted to the rights of democracy, and felt ouselves as equal citizens of the State, posed as censors, poured satire upon the Germans, considered ourselves as prophets, made revolutions, gave to the international proletariat a second Bible…The Jew Lasalle organized the masses. The Jew Edward Bernstein popularized the Marxian ideology; and the Jews Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg brought the Spartacist movement to life. In Bavaria the Jew Kurt Eisner seized power. Against all this the German nation rebelled. She wanted to forge her own destiny and determine the future of her own children. Can we blame her?...” pg.189-190 EUROPEAN JUNGLE by Yeats-Brown.

It the Jews don’t understand this I question their collective intelligence.  If they do understand this they are right to live in fear of the rest of humanity.

Posted by MOB on January 17, 2012, 07:19 PM | #

I see KM has an article posted today about Lee Siegel’s attack on Romney’s whiteness.  I don’t agree with the focus; I consider Romney’s alliance with Jews to be more important.  Maybe the whole point of Siegel’s attack is to divert attention from that.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/01/lee-siegel-the-horror-of-implicit-whiteness/?show=comments

Posted by anon on January 18, 2012, 02:46 AM | #

MOB

I’m just saying what a surprise it has been to find how MUCH of men’s thought contains sex as an ever-present element.

I was thinking blackmail. They like to have non-Jewish looking stooges as shop-window goys. The stooges need to have a reason e.g.
- sociopath
- stupid
- money
- women
- homosexual

Perry - stupid + money
Bachman - stupid
Gingrich - sociopath
Cain - money + women
etc

To me Romney doesn’t fit sociopath, stupid or women so that left money and homosexual. I’d assumed money but one of the photos you linked made me wonder because he looked like he knew he was in a nest of vipers - probably just a fluke. It’s probably stupid + money and he’s just slightly better at hiding stupid than the others.

Posted by anon on January 18, 2012, 02:51 AM | #

I don’t agree with the focus; I consider Romney’s alliance with Jews to be more important.

Pointing out double standards is the way to undermine a moral authority and the NYT claims moral authority.

People are more likely (or only likely) to listen to alternative views once their faith and trust in the current moral authority is gone.

Posted by Moore on January 18, 2012, 03:06 AM | #

Romney is a devout Mormon. I don’t think he’s homosexual.

Mormons are similar to Evangelicals in that they’re pretty pro-Jewish and have some sort of relationship with them.

Posted by Søren Renner on January 18, 2012, 09:31 AM | #

Romney is not stupid.

Posted by Leon Haller on January 20, 2012, 05:24 PM | #

For any American Republican primary voters here: I would suggest Ron Paul in the primary. He is the best for our cause, if only indirectly.

For the general, I would support any Republican over Obama. I have never voted GOP (or Dem) for president, but things are so bad right now, that other, pragmatic concerns must take precedence.

Note Romney has been hanging surpringly tough on at least illegal immigration. The WSJ has naturally criticized this.