EMANCIPATORY RACISM

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 27, 2009, 10:02 AM | #

Good, original ideas here.  Thanks for this. 

My two cents:

”Racism is an escape from the fear of one’s own mortality.”

OK … but is “escape” the right word?  How about “an answer” instead of “an escape”?  Or how about “a solution”?  “Escape” there doesn’t feel right.

”The people as a collective can be understood as a creative factor. […I]t was not Neil Armstrong who landed on the moon but the White race itself.”

The Obama Administration is going to try to keep future generations from sensing that:

http://latteisland.blogspot.com/2009/05/is-there-kfc-on-mars.html ;

http://latteisland.blogspot.com/2009/05/odd-couple-what-obamas-nasa.html .

”If I look at a perfected Aryan body in a sculpture by Arno Breker, I see the ideal archetype of the White race.”

OK and I agree with your underlying point, but as for Breker specifically, is he that good?  I think he’s way overrated.  He gets the proportions of both men and women wrong.  Far more skilled and/or possessing far better taste in representing the “ideal archetype” of the Aryan body were the Classical and Hellenistic Greeks of Antiquity, the Renaissance Italians, and some modern Frenchmen like August Rodin and the Walloon Constantin Meunier.  (The Latins, in other words.  The Germanics have never been best at this art form.)

Posted by Dasein on May 27, 2009, 10:30 AM | #

A nice post.  The race as group organism provides a rudimentary explanation to the meaning of life.  This is part of the historical appeal and perhaps effect of Medieval Christianity (passim DS Wilson).  To anyone trapped in the multicult, know that having ‘unenlightened’ racial views can set you free.

Posted by Søren Renner on May 27, 2009, 11:00 AM | #

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/images/h2/h2_1984.364.7.jpg

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/rodn/ho_1984.364.7.htm

Posted by James Bowery on May 27, 2009, 11:36 AM | #

I think the Valorians have a valid point when they object to the “group organism” as “value”:

The ultimate “group organism” has existed since the first cell divided into two identical clones.  If humans take the “group organism” to the ultimate expression of “everlasting life”— clone societies—what of value will be created that does not already exist?

On the contrary, the thing that makes European culture (in the broad sense that includes breeding) so valuable—so creatively joyful—is its conscious support of individualism.  Other cultures don’t bring forth the value of the individual upon which the creativity of the culture is dependent.  The main problem with Euroman is his incomplete development of principled individualism that understands the individual as a stupendously harmonious sexual group organism consisting of unicellular asexual clones, and the individual man as the sexual organism endowed with an ability to appreciate creation itself.

Preservation of Euroman himself is not just of “collectors value” and not of value just to himself as extended family (EGI), but to life itself as it becomes conscious of its own manifest creative power.

The first footprint on the moon was not the accomplishment of an individual, nor of a group organism, but of a culture of individualism in the broad sense of breeding and learning.

Posted by Tanstaafl on May 27, 2009, 11:57 AM | #

baby laughing

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 27, 2009, 01:50 PM | #

Excellent video linked above by Tanstaafl.  Very gratifying that it’s had 70k views.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 27, 2009, 01:52 PM | #

After viewing that Tanstaafl video, look at this photo:

http://latteisland.blogspot.com/2009/05/german-girls-trained-to-care-for-black.html

Posted by Guessedworker on May 27, 2009, 06:48 PM | #

A tidy post, Constantin.  Thanks.

Perhaps rather than escape, consolation.  And let’s be clear that liberty belongs to us and ours, not to the children of liberalism.

Posted by danielj on May 27, 2009, 07:05 PM | #

More Laughing Baby

Posted by Loriver on May 27, 2009, 07:58 PM | #

Interesting post. I wonder, are these post-hoc rationalisations of more fundamental motivations, or structures elaborated upon such a fundamental set, once the conscious mind has come to terms with it? Perhaps a combination of both?

The latter is the most honest, surely. I believe that all humans have a fundamental ethnocentric capacity, and if an individual is racist then this capacity must be realised (given the lack of conscious inhibitions that then exist, and the availability of cues for ethnocentrism), ergo racism cannot be a purely higher-intellectual phenomenon.

Posted by Dunkanoion on May 28, 2009, 08:17 AM | #

A cognate pare of Hoffmeisters hypothesis may be C.G. Jungs theory of the Collective Uncounscious!  From my understanding Jung actually started this theory as a Racialst Theory about the hidden forces that ‘control’ Races.  This then found its expression in Jungs famous Essay titled: ‘Wotan’ (About National Socialist Germany).

Don’t buy liberals saying it was about ‘the human Race’ as a whole non-sense!!

Indeed the Jews have even found it necessary to attack Jung as a… wait for it… RACIST in a book titled: Aryan Christ by Richard Noll.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 31, 2009, 01:23 PM | #

Nice entry, up today, by Auster:  http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013310.html .

Here’s an excerpt:

”I have to say that there is something unreal about this exchange.  It’s very late in the game for this kind of discussion.  It’s as though we, white Westerners, were at leisure, securely in charge of our societies, and can have a nice intellectual conversation about how much race matters, how much culture matters, and who should be let in, and who shouldn’t, and you think my standards are too stringent.  What you don’t seem to understand is that all the European and European based people are in the process of rapidly becoming minorities in their own countries.  So this is not about some non-threatening question of who can assimilate and who can’t.  This is about our racial, existential survival, right now.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 02, 2009, 05:41 PM | #

A little something to lift everyone’s spirits:

http://latteisland.blogspot.com/2009/06/latvia-is-blonde-and-proud.html

Posted by The Monitor on June 04, 2009, 05:25 PM | #

This emancipatory racism stuff is downright mystical. Will you built an altar and sacrifice a goat to your genome?

If liberalism is taking over our brains, maybe the fault is in our biology, buried in the race you hope to protect. How do you know that YOU are not holding back destiny by fighting a self-defeating campaign against your selfish genes?

Posted by James Bowery on June 04, 2009, 08:01 PM | #

Good question Hall Monitor!  The real question, though, is whether humans are a good idea or not, not whether “the fault is in our biology”, because the problem with whites is the problem with humans:

Moral imprint vulnerability.

It’s just that some races are more prone to human characteristics, hence human frailty, than others.

The biological problem isn’t with this or that ethnic group, but with animals vs humans while humans are emerging from ignorance of their own animal aspects.

There might be a way for humans to evolve better biological adaptation to their moral imprint vulnerability (for example, tying said vulnerability to pheromones that signal kinship in the preacher, teacher or story teller), and if we find such mechanisms we should seriously consider genetic engineering to enhance our immunity to virulent meme-gene complexes.

Posted by saka on June 08, 2009, 04:04 PM | #

This is emancipatory racism.

No, you actually got something right: it is “escape”. But what some call kinism, and more usually bullying appeals to collective responsibility (i.e. the individual is a “defeatist” if they don’t take the weight of the herd onto their shoulders), is the escape, is cowardice, and not raci(al)ism. It may be construed as “emancipation” if one desires to be emancipated from real loneliness into the woolly bosom of an imaginary collective.

OK … but is “escape” the right word?  How about “an answer” instead of “an escape”?  Or how about “a solution”?  “Escape” there doesn’t feel right.

That’s because it inadvertently tells the truth about WN collectivism; so your unease at what I would call Constantin’s naïveté, fumbling into a psychological insight he can’t fully grasp, is also telling. “Answer” sounds positive, “escape” undermines the illusion that collectivist ideology has anything to offer the lone, disenfranchised white. In fact it is no answer and no escape, in real life. But they’re great surrogates in the imaginary world of white nationalism.

Nothing surprising there. People hide in groups, real or imagined, all the time; it’s safety, it’s an illusion of power, or at least an evasion of powerlessness as an individual. From Constantin it’s bad literature. For most white nationalists it’s a way of life.

In sum, I’d make it: “White Nationalism is an escape from the fear of one’s own mortality.” Not because we don’t have ethnic interests; I mean WN as it is and must be presently constituted, in the confines of a box with wires in it, flashing signs at stationary, unarmed individuals separated by thousands of miles.

Posted by Tanstaafl on June 08, 2009, 05:10 PM | #

White Nationalism is an escape from the fear of one’s own mortality

Hedonism, consumerism, materialism, and even “White flight” are all more concrete and universal phenomena and more aptly described as “escape” from that fear.

White nationalism is the conscious decision to confront the reality of these phenomena, and their causes, looking forward and back in fear of a collective end, not individual.

Posted by antistate on June 09, 2009, 01:47 AM | #

Mr. Bowery wrote:

I don’t know how much more clearly I can state it.

re: GOD hypothesis

It was interesting to see your scatterbrained attempt to link the undefined yet scientific-sounding phrase “ecological annealing” to the prison rape of Nordics. 

For the sake of clarity, let me know where they sell the crack, pot.

Posted by 70-443 on June 11, 2009, 02:57 AM | #

What kinds of things do people do if they are being racist?
Racism takes many different forms. These can include:
•  Personal attacks of any kind, including violence
•  Written or verbal threats or insults
•  Damage to property, including graffiti