![]() |
Europe’s Future ChallengesEurope’s Future Challenges by Kai Murros
The Primary Problem our planet is facing today is the diffusion of the effects of the western scientific-industrial revolution to non-European societies. The world is out of balance as practically all human societies on the planet are being ravaged by the violent changes of modernization. The scientific-industrial revolution, which originated in Europe and catapulted our civilization to its zenith, has found its way to every corner of the world so that there is no traditional culture left untouched by its side effects. The present population explosion has long historical roots - going back at least to the 18th century in Europe. The population of Europe had been steadily growing ever since the massive collapse caused by the Black Death in the 14th century. Due to various reasons there was a considerable decline in the mortality during the 18th century, which then was followed by massive population growth—the growth rate in Europe in those days was the same as in the Third World today. A growing population was our demographical weapon, which combined with the scientific revolution and growing industrial output provided us with the means to conquer the world. Today, after a long period of demographical transition, our population growth has virtually stopped and will soon be in decline. Historically we have moved from High Fertility + High Mortality -phase to High Fertility + Low Mortality -phase and finally have reached the Low Fertility + Low Mortality -phase with a quickly ageing population. At the same time the results of the scientific and industrial revolution have spread into the Third World resulting in a High Fertility + Low Mortality –phase with massive population explosion. The question of life and death for our planet is: How long will the demographic transition take in the Third World - that is, how long will it take from the Third World to move from High Fertility + Low Mortality phase to Low Fertility + Low Mortality phase? If this demographic transition takes 200 years like in Europe the planet is doomed—100 years is equally impossible. In fact we have to be able to find a way to curb the population growth within the next 50 years—which also, unfortunately, seems to be impossible. The biggest obstacle seems to be the fact that this demographic transition requires creating an industrial society to increase the material production and in this way to dramatically raise people’s living standards. This is exactly what happened in Europe between 1770-1970 and today it would still seem impossible to bring about a similar demographic transition in the Third World without a massive improvement in the material means of life. The problem however is whether it is possible because it has been estimated that this would require 4.6 times the resources of our planet. In short we can say that in order to save our planet from the perils of the population explosion we should be able to create a global industrial consumer society which is just as impossible as the current population growth run by poverty and backwardness. We must also bear in mind that industrialisation alone didn’t absorb the ever-swelling masses of Europe’s rural poor. At the critical juncture of our history when the population growth reached its height Europe was blessed with boundless opportunities to colonize new land: The Americas, Australia, New Zealand, Siberia, large parts of Southern and Eastern Africa absorbed the demographic pressure of millions of Europeans when the pace of industrialization was not quick enough to provide these people with jobs and income. Today, 100-200 years later we encounter these migrations again except that this time the world is packed. There are no empty continents to colonize, no wilderness to tame and to settle. The Third World poor are now pushing into our densely populated societies with only a modest economic growth, which reduces the ever-increasing masses of low-skilled labour permanently into a hostile underclass. Our conclusion must then be that there are simply too many people on this planet. Human population is not qualitatively different from any other population of social animals. Human intelligence has made it possible for the human race to break the environmental limitations and grow exponentially… at least until now. Demographic expansion, which used to be our strength, has become our weakness. Now we are in danger of being overwhelmed by more expansive populations. Like in nature, these populations will keep on growing as long as they can send their surplus to colonize new territory. The masses of the Third World will keep on growing until they reach and cross the absolute limit their habitat can sustain, after which they will collapse. As long as Europe, Australia, USA and Canada allow the flux of immigrants from the Third World, the growth will continue unchecked. The population explosion in the Third World will be the final push in the exponential growth of mankind beyond the limits of earth’s sustainability, a process that started in the 18th. Century in Europe. By absorbing the population surplus of the Third World we are only facilitating the growth and in this way speeding up the global ecological disaster. It is clear that with a rapidly growing population the attempts to increase consumption per capita in the long run fail because the natural resources nevertheless remain limited and as a result the amount of available resources per capita is only shrinking. Some optimists seem to think that it could be possible for the developing economies to avoid our “mistakes” and bring about an industrial revolution and improve the material standard of living of the poor by acquiring sophisticated technology that pollutes less and consumes less energy and resources. These optimists place their faith in technology that one could avoid phase 1. and go straight to phase 2. This however is simple fantasy given the enormity of the problem – the staggering amount of poor whose lives should be improved and the short time span when this should happen. In the coming decades an estimated 1,2 billion people will enter the job market and only about 300 million will find employment if things remain as they are. Also nobody really seems to know exactly what this new environmentally friendly technology should be like. We may assume that new technology is always more expensive than the old technology. Therefore if the developing economies wish to repeat the industrial revolution of the West and improve their standard of living, they will have to resort to less sophisticated labour intensive technology, which also consumes more energy and raw materials and pollutes more. Since even we haven’t yet reached phase 2. it is difficult to think that the industrialization of the Third World could be ecologically any friendlier than the industrialization of the West originally was. It is very unlikely that science in the foreseeble future can make breakthroughs that would increase the amount of usable natural resources - at least in such quantities that it would satisfy the growing needs in time. As the natural resources are getting more scarce while the demand is growing, the direct result is that the Third World societies are under increasing strain.
Many Third World countries are in danger of collapsing under the intense pressure of growing population. Many African countries have long ago ceased to function as states and have been reduced into mere theoretical political concepts. Population explosion causes a massive strain on the social structure intensifying the conflict between the rich and the poor and in case there actually is economic growth, the growing population has the tendency to strip societies of its results since the number of the poor grows quicker than the economy. As the social and economic strain builds up, new political and religious extremist groups will emerge – the rise of radical Islam can be seen as a way of channelling the social frustration of the Islamic world. The modern megacities should be seen as incubators of violence in a global scale. Global population explosion and the depleting natural resources create not only internal threats to poor societies but also external threats. Future wars will be fought over basic necessities of life – water, arable land and maybe even clean air. These future wars will be ecological wars, they may decide the starvation or survival of millions of people. The future wars will mean the introduction of ecological factors into global politics and geo-strategy. Third World societies will eventually plunge into chaos as it will become impossible to govern such massive populations. The refugee problem we face today is only an appetizer to what will come in the future. The number of refugees will grow exponentially – large sections of the population in the poor south will be on the move desperately seeking for a better life, desperately trying to survive. More and more people will be on the move due to environmental reasons and it will be increasingly difficult to tell apart political refugees from environmental refugees as social, political and ecological crisis intertwine. GLOBALIZATION Much of the current industrial activity in the developing economies is largely the result of outsourcing of western industrial base to countries with substandard wages and working conditions and no environmental laws. For decades the economists have been explaining to us that this erosion of Europe’s industrial base only benefits us and the entire world in the long run – by now it should be clear to everybody that this is not the case. The outsourcing of Europe’s industrial base brings us two serious problems: The massive loss of industrial jobs during the last few decades hasn’t been balanced by an equal number of reasonably payed service jobs – as was the original liberal economic theory. The opposite has happened instead – the ample supply of new low-skilled workers from the Third World has often reduced service jobs to modern slavery with less than minimum wages and substandard working conditions. As a result large numbers of Europeans suffer now from perpetual poverty.
If we choose to accept this post-industrial fallacy we are committing a slow suicide. The power and wealth of the western civilization came from industrial production. If we now deliberately give up our industrial base, we are also fragmenting the bedrock of our civilization. TV game shows and Mac jobs will not sustain our global power and strength nor our pride as a race. We must have the intellectual courage to challenge the prevailing paradigm in modern economics which states that outsourcing Europe’s industrial strength benefits not only us but the whole world. The outsourcing of industry mostly to China and India also means that the profits the transnational corporations accumulate cannot be taxed. This erosion of tax base leads eventually to a collapse of the western nation states as they become increasingly incapable of providing basic services for their citizens and maintaining the infrastructure. So far we have been able to avoid this pitfall simply by borrowing more money. By allowing the transnational corporations to move industrial production and capital freely, we accept their dominance over us. We accept that these companies operate beyond our laws and keep to themselves all the profits they make by utilizing cheap non-European labour and our buying power. We have allowed transnational corporations to grow more powerful than nation states, we have allowed them to extort us, to bleed us and to abuse us. We have allowed the transnational conglomerate complex to become more powerful than European civilization itself. We have been led to believe that the prosperity of transnational corporations is our prosperity as well – once we realize that this is not the case, we will deem transnational corporations redundant. Transnational corporations are mere paper tigers. They are not natural communities that are based on blood, soil and emotional ties. Transnational corporations are market places where people gather to sell their work force. Transnational corporations are based on immaterial agreements and on the delicate balance between greed and trust. Once the trust is gone, the transnational corporation dissolves. In the end it will be very easy to shake transnational corporations off our back – their power is a only an illusion – we can knock them down with a feather. A transnational corporation cannot exist without natural communities. The immaterial and parasitical nature of transnational corporations requires the existence of concrete natural communities. Transnational corporations devour the nation states and their life energy. A transnational corporation needs the nation state and the services it provides – services it demands free of charge – everything the transnational corporation then does only wrecks the human society in which it operates. The driving force behind modern global capitalism is the disparity between the affluent West and the poor Third World. Modern global capitalism thrives as long it can demolish the western societies without them falling into utter chaos. Once the western societies are dilapidated enough, utter chaos breaks out and global capitalism ends. The greatest threat to the ecosphere comes from western industrial production that has been outsourced to Third World countries. The poor chaotic societies down south are totally unable and unwilling to control how the environmental needs are met in these sprawling industrial plants. Had the industrial complex stayed in Europe, it could have been scrutinized and placed under strictest supervision until all environmental needs would have been met. Instead the opposite happened – the very competitive advantage of the developing economies is the lack of environmental laws or their inefficient supervision. It is ironic that as Europe is getting weaker by haemorrhaging its industrial strength into the Third World, it is also speeding up the process of global environmental collapse. CHINA China’s success has been heralded as the demise of the western dominance but also as the victory of global corporate capitalism over nation states and welfare societies. China has been the most important instrument for the transnational corporations in wrecking the social structure of the western world. China has been used as an example for the European working class and middle class of the new social reality they should accept. China’s success has resulted in widespread reverse racism in the European world - reverse racism with a definite liberal agenda. But the question remains: Will East prevail over West? My answer is NO! In view of China’s past history we can make an assumption that despite all the recent success China is experiencing the last stages of the so-called “dynastic cycle”. The reoccurring pattern in China’s history has been the rise and fall of dynasties. A dynastic cycle begins when the country is united by a new energetic dynasty after a period of chaos, civil war and barbarian invasions. When the dynastic cycle is then closing to an end, the symptoms of weakness become evident. These symptoms are: Frequent peasant uprisings indicate that the system has used its energy and is beginning to collapse from the inside. Finally the whole country is engulfed in a bitter civil war usually accompanied by an invasion of the nomadic tribes who exploit the situation. When the emperor loses the mandate of heaven in the eyes of the people, the dynastic cycle ends only to start again after some time. All the aforementioned symptoms can be seen in present-day China. China’s communist party is simply a modern dynasty started by Chairman Mao, a dynasty which cannot escape the logic of the dynastic cycle. 1. China is plagued by an enormous population growth – even if the One Child Policy works, China’s population will nevertheless grow considerably simply because the Chinese live longer. 2. The enormous industrial growth has caused a state ecological disaster in large parts of China. Most of China’s rivers are polluted and the level of ground water is falling. Intensive farming has also turned large parts of Northern China into a dust bowl. To deal with the impending ecological disaster would require enormous sums of money, which China doesn’t have and political will, which China also lacks since the whole system is geared to produce a maximum of profit in a minimum of time to bridge the gap between China and the West as soon as possible. China’s competitive advantage is its nonexistent environmental legislature. China’s government and especially the authorities on the local level do not want to take the risk of unemployment and civil unrest if companies have to be closed down due to environmental reasons. 3. The gap between the rural poor and urban population has widened ever since the start of China’s opening to capitalism. This polarization of society is causing constant unrest and is a considerable threat to stability – which is also acknowledged by the Chinese government. 4. The more China is becoming a market economy, the more Chinese civil service is becoming corrupt. Despite China’s initial success in dealing with capitalism, capitalism and a dictatorial, bureaucratic system is a very poor combination. Money has thoroughly corrupted China’s civil service. When China still was in fact a socialist country, money, material status and economic advancement didn’t mean a thing – on the contrary they could even be dangerous since a person could be singled out as a traitor. Now as the market economy has been introduced to every level of the society and getting rich is not only accepted but also endorsed by the government, it is only natural that political offices will be used for personal gains. The union between government and business is complete and politics in every level is only a continuation of business. Since the Chinese system of government is probably the least transparent in the world, the protection it provides to the individual citizen goes only as far as one can bribe the system. In China the individual is always at the mercy of the system and at the mercy of those who have the money to bribe the system. This naturally erodes the legitimacy of the system in the eyes of the people. So far the legitimacy of China’s ruling Communist Party was based on the fact that Communists were the national force that unified the country and drove away the foreign intruders – over the decades this has given the Communist Party an enormous clout. Secondly, the stunning success of the economy since the early 80’s and China’s emergence to the global arena have been enough to buy the loyalty of the people. Chinese people are also acutely aware of the chaos which would undoubtedly follow if the regime of the Communist Party collapsed. In China’s history there is a constant movement back and forth between chaos and restored imperial authority. The greatest fear of the Chinese people is chaos because Chinese history is full of examples of how massive the bloodshed and destruction can be when the political system collapses. For the Chinese even a bad government is better than chaos, but the question is just how bad the government can get before it loses the mandate of heaven? When we try to assess the future of China, we must bear in mind that since the beginning of China’s opening to capitalism, China has been able to enjoy almost 30 years of unprecedented growth - so far China has been spared from serious economic setbacks. However we may take it as rule that the bigger the bull market, the bigger the bear market – when China finally will experience the first depression, it will be in relation to the staggering growth China has so far been able to enjoy. When the first serious depression hits China, the strength of the system will be put to a real test. In short we can say that China is a paper tiger – China’s growth is based on our industrial production that has been outsourced by greedy capitalists, China’s recently accumulated wealth is our wealth which our liberal elite has handed over - as long as we keep buying Chinese products China’s economy will prosper. However, all this will come to an end as the current economic crisis worsens – the buying power of the western “post-industrial” societies will die out and as a result the flow of capital to China will end and China’s economy and society will collapse. In the end the East will not prevail over us and neither will the South – no matter how quickly they breed. Now, as the foundations of global capitalism are falling, the cornerstone of the liberal world order is also crumbling. Finally the civilizations of the earth are put to a real test and despite all our current problems we will emerge as the winners. Actually we need this crisis. This crisis will make us stronger, it will make us wiser and more decisive. This crisis will once again teach us to understand the fundamental truths of life – this crisis is a great opportunity to us! The European revolution will primarily be an ecological and an environmental revolution. We must fight the perils of population explosion. We must protect the environment from the ravages of global capitalism. And we must secure Europe her fair share of the world’s natural resources at a time when they are quickly running out. European revolution as an ecological revolution is not only an absolute necessity but also a great opportunity for our race to once again take a great leap forward. So far we have been only exploiting the earth’s resources and dominated nature. Now we will learn ways to give back, to give our contribution to this blue green oasis in the space. The European race, which by its nature is a faustian race, is the prodigal son of Gaia – and now it is time for the prodigal son to return home. The European race will become the guardian race of Mother Earth. Our supremacy over other civilizations will be based on this manifest destiny. European civilization which is the most advanced civilization on earth will also spearhead the ecological revolution just as it initiated both the scientific and industrial revolution. It is absolutely clear that this kind of change is impossible if we allow corrupt capitalists and infantile liberals set the pace. The great technological transition in the means of production will never be accomplished if we allow transnational corporations to sabotage our economy by exploiting cheap labour with the help of the corrupt governments in the Third World. To achieve our goals we need a global strategy, centralized planning and a ruthless will to execute these plans: We will re-industrialize Europe. New forms of production will spread as our industrial strength is re-patriated, new economic activity will energize Europe, a new enthusiasm, optimism and determination will move European masses as desperation, pessimism and indecision subside. There will be jobs for the jobless, homes for the homeless, there will be new hope for those who thought that the future would hold nothing for them. The honour and dignity of the working men and women of Europe will be restored and our civilization will once again be strong to defend its legitimate claims on this planet.
Posted by Constantin von Hoffmeister on Tuesday, August 4, 2009 at 10:02 AM in Political analysis Comments:2
Posted by jamesUK on August 04, 2009, 12:07 PM | # Søren Renner references and dissects thesis of Dugin essay in speech. 3
Posted by Iceman / Metal Gear on August 04, 2009, 05:20 PM | # Nice to read something that is a bit more sophisticated than usual. 4
Posted by lol on August 04, 2009, 07:28 PM | # Søren Renner references and dissects thesis of Dugin essay in speech. “Adding comments has been disabled for this video.” What a surprise. 5
Posted by jamesUK on August 04, 2009, 08:22 PM | # It’s Renners YouTube channel not Dugins if he has one. What comment were you going to post? Best Dugin video I’ve seen outline a new centre of political thought in the final battle ground charting the course of history and the destiny of the world Eurasia. 6
Posted by Lurker on August 05, 2009, 09:26 AM | # And be sure to check out the Russian girl in the background (green top, ponytail) in JamesUK’s link. Sorry to lower the tone;) 7
Posted by Red Mercury on August 05, 2009, 10:09 AM | # By transferring our treasure to the East and simultaneously importing non-white masses to the West, either the elites have perpetrated a massive scam on us (admittedly scam is too weak a word—war cime & genocide are better words for what these monsters are doing), or they are enormously stupid and have made a grave error (which they are too proud to admit). I recall during the NAFTA debates in the 1990s, that one of the reasons respectable conservatives encouraged support for the measure was that it would cut down on immigration. Such was not the case and in fact immigration increased. Was this a miscalculation? Or did corporate conservatives know all along that immigration would grow? Sorry to lower the tone;) You may have lowered it, but the sultry Russian girl raises it. 8
Posted by cladrastis on August 05, 2009, 11:40 AM | # According to Philip Longman, the population growth train may still be chugging uphill, but it is decelerating rapidly (and this in a global sense). Fertility is declining throughout the world (albeit in the West and E. Asia faster than elsewhere), but this is exactly the opportunity about which we have dreamed. This trend spells the death of Homo americanus. Here is how Longman articulates it: “In a world of falling human population only fundamentalists would draw new strength. For the deep messages of the Bible and the Koran, and of all the world’s ancient religions, are relentlessly pro-natal. And so, too, are the fundamentalist ideologies of fascism and racism, with their ambition to breed “supermen” out of ancient bloodlines.” and “Those who reject modernity thus seem to have an evolutionary advantage, whether they are clean-living Mormons, or Muslims who remain committed to comparatively large families, or members of emerging sects and national movements that combine pro-natalism with antimaterialism.” The only question remaining in my mind is how much longer the globalist, post-modern system can sustain itself - and thus how much of a selective advantage we may gain from its descent; “we” are still way behind “them”, but unlike them, we know how the game works. 9
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 05, 2009, 01:01 PM | # “the Russian girl in the background (green top, long single braid)” 10
Posted by Svigor on August 05, 2009, 01:38 PM | #
It occurs that the -ism is the only just cause for laughter, the way it would be when attached to hunger, for example. No one needs an -ism to pursue their interest in food, and the elite don’t need an -ism to pursue their interest in global (since we can’t live off-planet yet, it seems reasonable to limit the range thus, to avoid confusion) centralized power. 11
Posted by Lurker on August 05, 2009, 08:40 PM | # I’m sorry Fred, love is blind (to the technicalities of hair presentation). 12
Posted by White Preservationist on August 06, 2009, 03:27 PM | #
But the world population is still expected to grow by about another 2-3 billion in the next 40-50 years or so. Nearly all of that population growth is slated to occur in 2nd/3rd world (i.e., non-White) countries. About 75-100 years ago Whites were around 25-33% of the world’s population, now we are only about 10-15% (depending on definitions of ‘Whiteness’) and Whites are slated to drop to less than 10% in the next few decades. Thus it is clear that Whites are becoming the persecuted minority in the world as we are being swamped by non-Whites who want to claim our vast White territories as their own, particularly at the two poles of the White world (Russia and North America). We can NEVER allow this to occur - every inch of White territory ceded to non-Whites only weakens us Whites and strengthens the non-Whites. Nowadays very many moronic overbreeding 3rd worlders want to immigrate to White-Western nations for ‘better lives’ because they’ve overbred in their own countries and strained their resources, insanely polluted their local/national environment, etc. For instance, the morons down in Central America have bred and bred and bred and have now overgrown the bounds of their small nations (water, food, sewage capacity, etc) and thus have been pouring in to ‘El Norte’ for years. Also, have you ever read about how disgustingly crowded small nations such as Bangladesh are? The other racial groups in the world are clearly less advanced than Whites in terms of future-time orientation - I even include East Asians in this. They have massively overpopulated their countries and massively strained their resources, and now many of them seek to immigrate to White-Western nations for the less crowded and cleaner conditions. This must be opposed AT ALL COSTS - we must NEVER allow the Americas to become an Asian ‘beachhead’! This is already happening on the West coasts of the USA and Canada, with Asiatic colonies all over the place there. Eventually many of them will have to be repatriated back to their Asian homelands - North America is White territory and must always remain that way: it is not a place for overbreeding and non-forward-thinking Asiatics to dump their surplus population. The fact is that non-White nations are using our own White-Western invented technologies and medical advances against us in an attempt to outbreed us and then swamp our lands and steal our resources. Various Asian nations especially look greedily upon the vast territories of the Western USA and Canada as future sites of Asiatic population expansion as I said above. Why are we financing our own eventual displacement? It’s because the WHITE SUICIDALISTS have ascended to power in the USA and other White nations - these people must be stopped. This includes many White hypercapitalists and globalists, along with the gaggle of parasitic Jews they are allied with. —-
13
Posted by White Preservationist on August 06, 2009, 03:48 PM | # My above comments were originally made on Mangan’s blog in a similar entry dealing with too much non-White population growth and the ecocide that so often results from that - read more comments @ http://mangans.blogspot.com/2009/08/anti-birthers.html I also left some comments there under the name “Deurbanization” that include a couple excerpts from the pro-White books by Grant and Stoddard as to how Northern Europeans/Nordics so often flounder and decline if they are forced to live and compete in overcrowded urban conditions. It is my opinion that Northern Europeans/Nordics will likely never be able to adequately compete with Jews and various other Asiatics in densely populated urban areas because Jews/Asiatics/etc are used to those ‘gutter’ urban conditions (they having lived and thrived in them for much longer than Northern Euro Whites) and thus they have a much higher tolerance for that type of living. A major problem though is that Jews (who are of course big-city-dwelling “rootless cosmopolitans” par excellence) have been steadily amassing and concentrating their power (financial, social, political, etc) in various overpopulated urban areas for many decades now and thus shutting out Northern Europeans/Nordics who often cannot tolerate living in those rat-like big-city conditions. As a result the only solution is for Northern Europeans/Nordics to depopulate the big cities and move to more spacious suburban and rural areas (which is exactly what Americans of Northern European/Nordic descent have been doing almost instinctively for decades now) where we can build our own White societies away from the multiracial Jew-led sewers that so many White-Western cities have become. However, there is clearly no room left for this type of expansion in many of the crowded nations of Northern Europe (e.g., the Netherlands, Denmark, Northern Germany, etc), and thus Northern Euros living in those overcrowded nations should be encouraged to immigrate and spread-out to other White nations which have much more available living space available such as the USA, Russia, Argentina, etc so that they can begin to thrive again. 14
Posted by White Preservationist on August 06, 2009, 04:17 PM | # You can also see how nations such as the UK have degenerated socioculturally as they have become progressively overpopulated in recent decades - the UK for example should only have about half if its current population: “UK Population Must Fall to 30m, Says Porritt”. Forget the anti-White implications of the research in that link, but the thrust of his ideas are fully correct. Cutting the population of overcrowded Northern European/Nordic nations does not at all have to involve genociding them, but rather just encouraging them to immigrate to less populated White nations like the USA, Canada, Russia, Argentina, and so forth as I explained above. I’ve been noticing for years how the best Britons (the most Nordic ones) have been immigrating away from the UK in an effort to escape those overcrowded conditions - and we here in White North America (USA and Canada) are of course very glad to receive those prime humans. However, that means that since the best Britons often leave the UK for better conditions they are thus allowing it to be taken over by the worst elements (including non-White immigrants) and ultimately controlled by organized Jewry who can tolerate and indeed very often thrive in overpopulated urban areas. The data on overcrowding is clear; it causes a rapid and undeniable degeneration of all mammals forced to live in them - look at the research of John B. Calhoun for example:
15
Posted by Red Mercury on August 06, 2009, 04:40 PM | # To some extent numbers are a problem. I realise it probably offends the crypto-Christian morality of some here, but at some stage WNs must consider seriously the use of bio-warfare to reduce the population numbers of Africans, Asians, Muslims, and others. After all we are dealing with a rodent problem. 16
Posted by Guessedworker on August 06, 2009, 05:44 PM | # Red Mercury, Nationalist politics are bio-warfare. WP’s rats just need one of their number to realise that itz the lab staff! 17
Posted by White Preservationist on August 07, 2009, 03:42 AM | # In terms of the outsourcing of the heavy industrial base of White nations, this has had a very positive side…think about it: we’ve been exporting our pollution! I agree that we should always remain fully secure and nationally-sufficient in terms of food production, defense production, transportation, and so on, but as I stated above we Westerners have been able to avoid further damaging our own national environments by exporting much industrial production overseas to non-White nations. As Kai writes:
The Asian countries and other rapidly industrializing nations are soiling their own nests with their hyperindustrial obsessions. Very bad mistake. However, they don’t have much of a choice - I read somewhere a little while back that China has to create jobs for hundreds of thousands of their people every month, which must be a nightmare for its national government. Therefore, they are so desperate to create all of those jobs for their people that they will take any and all jobs they can get even if they involve majorly damaging their environment. 18
Posted by Norman Lowell on August 07, 2009, 04:48 AM | # “The greatest threats to Europe’s economic and social stability and actual physical survival in the future are the population explosion in the developing world, global ecological crisis, the depleting natural resources and the globalization of the economy. The survival of our civilization depends on our ability to solve these problems - we must be prepared to take decisive action to protect Europe from the perils of the collapsing world. Our conclusion must then be that there are simply too many people on this planet. Human population is not qualitatively different from any other population of social animals. Human intelligence has made it possible for the human race to break the environmental limitations and grow exponentially… at least until now. Demographic expansion, which used to be our strength, has become our weakness. Now we are in danger of being overwhelmed by more expansive populations. Like in nature, these populations will keep on growing as long as they can send their surplus to colonize new territory. The masses of the Third World will keep on growing until they reach and cross the absolute limit their habitat can sustain, after which they will collapse. As long as Europe, Australia, USA and Canada allow the flux of immigrants from the Third World, the growth will continue unchecked. We must fight the perils of population explosion. We must protect the environment from the ravages of global capitalism. And we must secure Europe her fair share of the world’s natural resources at a time when they are quickly running out.”
The White Race has to be bound together with a sense of kinship: Only a Unifying IDEA can bring this about. Imperium 19
Posted by Q on August 07, 2009, 09:41 AM | # “The greatest threats to Europe’s economic and social stability and actual physical survival in the future are the population explosion in the developing world ...” Exactly. Roy Beck presents an excellent demonstration over at Numbers USA explaining that very troubling fact. http://www.numbersusa.com/content/resources/video/recommended/immigration-gumballs.html 20
Posted by Søren Renner on August 07, 2009, 12:20 PM | #
I wish I had written that. 21
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 07, 2009, 10:50 PM | # Snouck calls for “a moratorium on all Moslem immigration into the Netherlands”: http://www.islamineurope.net/2009/08/wolf-in-wolfs-clothing.html . Good. Once Dutchmen have gotten used to that idea, as a result of enough of them explicitly endorsing it, there need to be calls next for the humane “push-pull” repatriation of all Moslems and racial incompatibles (non-European peoples) from the Netherlands. Then let Dutchmen get used to that idea. Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step. Step-by-step and steady as she goes, with everyone doing his part, we’ll get there, to our destination. 22
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 07, 2009, 11:38 PM | # You would think, on reading this piece, http://www.vdare.com/misc/090806_allensworth.htm , that Christopher Lockwood has to be, absolutely has to be, either a Jew or a homosexual. Anyone happen to know? (But be careful — reading the piece will 1) set your teeth on edge, 2) make you feel as though you’ve just taken a shower in leprosy germs instead of water, 3) launch a migraine that will last days if not weeks.) Next entry: Sowing the Seeds: Powder Keg on the Baltic Previous entry: Hilton Hijinx |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. GlablePax commented in entry 'University official sentenced for child porn, blackmail' on 05/23/12, 08:23 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) cuiseur automatique seb commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 07:43 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:23 PM. (go) (view) 7 Year BA commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 09:19 PM. (go) (view) DARYL commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 08:57 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 08:31 PM. (go) (view) Church of Jed commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 07:40 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 05:56 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 11:37 AM. (go) (view) AnalogMan commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 11:29 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:42 AM. (go) (view) Srakotraqu commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 07:30 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:19 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 06:26 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 02:34 AM. (go) (view) Stephen commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/21/12, 06:33 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/21/12, 02:02 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/21/12, 04:46 AM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 11:17 PM. (go) (view) indian strategy commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle' on 05/20/12, 05:17 PM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 12:51 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 09:15 AM. (go) (view) Hymie in Afula commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 07:24 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/20/12, 06:39 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Bill on August 04, 2009, 12:05 PM | #
In many circles Globalism is none other than a euphemism for the New World Order, of which the mere mention is cause for a side splitting laugh. Me, I’m open to the idea there is more than a compelling notion that such a thing exists and who is behind it.
Most of the contents of this post alludes in no small way to the mass of problems we as Europeans are about to face, Globalism and population growth are the principle causes opines the author - but refrains from venturing further afield down the liberal yellow brick road.
Exactly what were the reasons behind the capitalist elite’s decision to ship out their industrial base to the Third World? This very base that had sustained and elevated millions of whites to an unprecedented standard of living along the road of human history.
Was it the elite’s bottom line? Transfer the degradation of the ecosystem to others - blame them? Or was it to ensure the downward spiral of the white race from which allied to other plans, (immigration) would ensure the demise of whites?
And if it was, (demise of whites) why?
I find it strange that at the moment the West transfers it productive wealth to the East, the hordes of migrants set out for the West, and who should be there to greet them but the very same elites who have impoverished the people of the targeted nation states of these fortune seeking migrants.
The result is white nation states are in chaos, over populated, masses unemployed, economic crises, exhausted welfare states, and an elite hostile to it’s own people.
Has this state of affairs been brought about by natural random events or have they been brought about deliberately by the elites? Have they launched their long laid plans for their New World Order?
This essay is far morel embracing than usual and catalogues many of the problems the white race faces, and they are not all man-made. (though some are) I’ve always maintained that there are many external (natural) events waiting to be played out that will affect our future.
Refreshingly, this essay is a more rounded view of the problems the people and the World faces and I for one find that welcoming.