Fashion challenge

Posted by martin_uk on December 28, 2011, 07:17 PM | #

Note that a couple of the white men in this picture look somewhat weedy. None of them are very muscular. There was a programme on the telly about 5 years ago that was a “talent show” to find the best male and female model out of a group of hopefuls. The black men and generally the non-white men on the show were all very well built and masculine, whereas the white men were all weedy and effeminate, and good looking in a “pretty” kind of way. It seemed to me that the show was trying to promote the idea (or at least going along with the idea) of white men only acceptable if queer and feminine whilst black men could be strong and masculine.

Posted by Eumaios on December 29, 2011, 02:07 AM | #

Also, the one female’s breast is barely distinguishable from that of a muscular male.

Posted by Leon Haller on December 29, 2011, 02:26 AM | #

These white dudes all look like deracinated, traditionless Eurofags.

The white race goes down not in battle, but degeneracy and self-mockery.

Posted by Leon Haller on December 29, 2011, 02:29 AM | #

What gives?

White people are just generally better looking than other races, at least our ‘best’ are. That will never change. White beauty is the global standard, and not simply because of past white dominance.

Posted by Lee John Barnes on December 29, 2011, 07:26 AM | #

The aim is to depict and dehumanise white people as plastic, disposable commodities - like shampoo or shoes.

We are depicted as dummys in a shop window, not as human beings.

Posted by Lee John Barnes on December 29, 2011, 07:42 AM | #

Look at the imagery - white males and women are depicted as plastic fuck dolls.

They are sexual commodities for people to treat as disposable fuck dolls, they are dehumanised and sexualised slaves.

Thet are exposing their genitals and breasts to show their value as sex toys for the rich.

Its like the slave markets of Rome and the English on sale as the most beautiful sex slaves in the Roman Empire.

Posted by anon on December 29, 2011, 02:04 PM | #

Its like the slave markets of Rome

Yup.

Posted by Bugger Off on December 29, 2011, 02:25 PM | #

It is availability signalling but also Testino who is known for his fuckability shots

http://www.beautyandthebum.com.au/2010/11/candice-does-copenhagen-vman-.html

Posted by HB on December 29, 2011, 06:38 PM | #

I think Greg Johnson just creamed his pants.

Posted by Dan Dare on December 29, 2011, 07:00 PM | #

Strikes me that the males featured would rather be bonking each other than the token female.

Posted by Papa Luigi on December 29, 2011, 07:16 PM | #

I don’t think we need react quite as puritanically as Lee Barnes to what is afterall a single image. There is nothing shameful in the naked human body and the image above simply depicts an assemblage of ‘pretty’ people in a cocky display of youth and beauty, albeit for merely commercial purposes. Nor do we need to be quite as disparaging as Eumaios has been of the individuals concerned, the young lady featured is the admittedly slender, but still gorgeous Candice Swanepoel, and my response to Eumaios’ remark is that ‘he should have gone to Spec-Savers’!

We should be conscious of the fact that the vast majority of fashion designers are homosexual men, and that the vast majority of fashion critics are feminist women, and insofar as the fashion world are the arbiters of physical beauty, it should come as no surprise to find; that the female models promoted by them are at the slender end of the range, some of which are dangerously skinny and boyishly flat-chested; and that the male models are from the ‘pretty boy’ end of the scale in terms of facial features, some of which are so ‘pretty’ and effeminate that they are veritable ‘lady-boys’ of seemingly ambiguous gender.

Leon Haller is correct in the second of his above posts:

White people are just generally better looking than other races, at least our ‘best’ are. That will never change. White beauty is the global standard, and not simply because of past white dominance.

In the world of fashion, a world in which a variety of rapidly changing colours and styles is their raison d’etre, models of aboriginal European extraction have a distinct advantage over others, in that one model can at various times naturally exhibit skin colour ranging from the whitest alabaster, through various shades of golden tan, to a rich coffee colour at the other extreme. Furthermore, European models can naturally feature a variety of hair colours ranging from; platinum blonde, through golden blonde, mousy blonde, to light golden brown, then medium brown and dark brown, all the way to black; and ranging from strawberry blonde, through various shades of golden ginger to auburn. European models can also naturally exhibit eye colur ranging from grey, through all of the various shades of blue and green, to hazel, and from golden brown through to dark brown.

By comparison, models from non-White races can offer skin colour that is either brown or black, dark brown eyes and black hair.

We are all aware of the great lengths that Michael jackson went to in order to have white skin and in order to appear European. We are all aware of the large numbers of Jewish girls and girls of other Semitic groups who resort to plastic surgery in order to obtain a smaller, straighter and narrower, and more classically European nose. We are all aware of the large numbers of East Asian women who similarly undergo plastic surgery in order to reduce the epicanthic fold over their eyes and achieve a more European appearance, and the numbers of non-Whites of both sexes now, who iron their fuzzy hair, or attempt to achieve a wave in their otherwise dead straight hair, and who dye their hair blonde or colour it with henna in an attempt to achieve a more European appearance.

What we rarely if ever see, other than very occasionally among drug addicts, is Europeans attempting to look Negroid, for example.

Another phenomenon that physical anthropologists note is the greater degree of sexual diamorphism among Europeans relative to non-Whites. Sexual diamorhism is the degree by which a typical female of a racial group differs physically from the typical male of that same group. Whites exhibit a greater degree of sexual diamorphism than Negros for example and this gives our women more pronounced femininity, such that white women are prized as sexual partners by men of all other races. One only has to see the disproportionate bias towards European women in pornography compared to the miniscule amount of pornograhic imagery devoted to women of other races, in order to appreciate the truth of Leon Haller’s statement that I have quoted above.

We should rejoice and be proud that our people are the most colourfully attractive and beautifully formed of all of the peoples on this planet, and let us now redouble our efforts to preserve that beauty, forever.

Posted by Campbell on December 29, 2011, 07:21 PM | #

Note that a couple of the white men in this picture look somewhat weedy. None of them are very muscular. There was a programme on the telly about 5 years ago that was a “talent show” to find the best male and female model out of a group of hopefuls. The black men and generally the non-white men on the show were all very well built and masculine, whereas the white men were all weedy and effeminate, and good looking in a “pretty” kind of way. It seemed to me that the show was trying to promote the idea (or at least going along with the idea) of white men only acceptable if queer and feminine whilst black men could be strong and masculine.

This is true especially of the media’s portrayal of blond and fairer white men.

If white men are featured positively, they are usually darker featured white men.

Blond and fairer men are invariably portrayed as effeminate, homosexual, or psychopathic, “white trash”, evil bad guys, criminals, etc.

Posted by Campbell on December 29, 2011, 07:55 PM | #

We should be conscious of the fact that the vast majority of fashion designers are homosexual men, and that the vast majority of fashion critics are feminist women

Not only that, the fashion-media-advertising complex is dominated by Jews, is a major business, promotes degenerate, decadent values and culture, and much of it is pornographic.

Contemporary fashion is not better than the fashion and clothing that existed before this complex.

It is extremely destructive. It consumes not only the models but thousands of dumb and naive young women who are seduced by the fashion industry and “work” for it in various capacities. It also extracts tremendous sums from people, who literally buy into the inimical status and value hierarchies crafted by the complex. Huge resources are diverted to this sterilizing complex, resources which could be used for healthier purposes, for family formation, high art, high technology, long-term projects more generally, etc.

Posted by danielj on December 29, 2011, 08:20 PM | #

NOT ANGLES, BUT ANGELS!!!

jooz: LOLOZZZLOLZIES!!!

Posted by uh on December 29, 2011, 08:41 PM | #

Strikes me that the males featured would rather be bonking each other than the token female.

I promise you each of them ... oh, how to say this without promoting decadent “Jewish” morality ... achieves union with more women in six months than most of us have in our lives.

Don’t be fooled. Just because the selectors are homos, yidden, and homo-yidden, doesn’t mean the selected are homos themselves. Most of this tribe of spaced-out Aryan prettyboys divide their months between Ibiza, Punta, and shoots in the fashion capitals. They also work in porn.

Gettin’ tonnes of that tan tail.

Posted by Robert Reis on December 30, 2011, 04:51 AM | #

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/12/mesira-and-child-sexual-abuse-in-brooklyn/

Posted by Ward Kendall on December 30, 2011, 12:55 PM | #

In this modern, decadent age where metrosexuals use hair-dye in what would have been deemed acts of frothing homosexuality in my day, it’s become pretty easy for me to spot dyed hair on men. That said, most of those teen-twat-teasers are not natural blonds, but fakes. One need only to focus on the very dark hair-roots of their scalps to know this. At least one of the chicks-r4-dicks is a fake blonde and the other one appears to be an “enhanced” blonde. All of them look like cheap beach trash.

Ward Kendall
author of Hold Back This Day
Amazon.com

Posted by Lee John Barnes on December 30, 2011, 02:05 PM | #

They look like a row of infltable fuck dolls in the window of a sex shop.

To be frank I am not sure which is male and female.

Someone should inflate them a bit more so the sex can be determined properly.