From Lisbon to Vladivostok – Europe, a Nation

Posted by jamesUK on March 25, 2010, 11:20 PM | #

Actually Lyndon LaRouche tried to incorporate and propose the development of the former Warsaw pact countries that had an industrial base it could have utilised and highly educated populace incorporated in the new unified German creating an East-West economic bridge which would include development of high speed rail network.
There was even a major bank director in German who was going to set a development bank but Britain and the US as always opposed this fearing a shift in British/US dominion in Europe with a unified Germany so the bank director was killed in a very sophisticated IED road side bomb and LaRouche was arrested and sent to prison in the US on bogus charges and the rest you can say is history or soon will be.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article30038.html

Posted by Grimoire on March 25, 2010, 11:31 PM | #

Great post Dan.

Posted by Dan Dare on March 26, 2010, 01:51 AM | #

Thank you Grimoire, I actually had your earlier remarks very much in mind while making it.

Posted by Guessedworker on March 26, 2010, 05:16 AM | #

Forms of mutuality in protection of Europe’s nation states beg the question: what is the state of the states being protected?  If the answer is: ethnically distinct and homogenous, and the sole purpose is to protect these distinct and homogenous ethnicities, I have no objection.  If the answer is wider than that, and involves a further political process I am viscerally opposed.  Likewise if the answer morphs into culturalism, the protection of Western civ, for example, or “Christendom”.  Only if we can better protect our blood does a pan-European mutualism have value for me.

Posted by Wandrin on March 26, 2010, 05:44 PM | #

Each nation in their own homeland living under their own laws in the way they want to live with an alliance for mutual defence of same.

Posted by Grimoire on March 27, 2010, 12:20 AM | #

@Guessedworker:
                      Forms of mutuality in protection of Europe’s nation states beg the question: what is the state of the states being protected?  If the answer is: ethnically distinct and homogenous, and the sole purpose is to protect these distinct and homogenous ethnicities, I have no objection.  If the answer is wider than that, and involves a further political process I am viscerally opposed.  Likewise if the answer morphs into culturalism, the protection of Western civ, for example, or “Christendom”.  Only if we can better protect our blood does a pan-European mutualism have value for me.
———————————————————————————-

  Yes friend but think, the future cannot preserve the past, it can only look back faithfully. The sole purpose of a European Republic (I will not say Union or State) cannot be to protect distinct ethnicities…..that will be the work of the nations within it. Eugenics programs will bring forth new possibilities unthought of. Distinct ethnicities in terms of genetics could actually radically alter all European ‘nations’. Europe will evolve as it must - but as Europe and not as Eurabia or Judeo/Europe.
The fact remains, traditional small European countries and peoples are county townships in this world compared to the relative colossus states in Asia and America. You must grasp this. We must put our houses in order and then go and conquer the world - (not subdue it by arms - but as the first among equals and leaders)
The new frontier of untold wealth, knowledge and even colonial adventure - is beyond Earth. We must do more than hope to pass into the future - we must master it. There is no other way.

Posted by Dan Dare on March 27, 2010, 02:27 AM | #

Forms of mutuality in protection of Europe’s nation states beg the question: what is the state of the states being protected?  If the answer is: ethnically distinct and homogenous, and the sole purpose is to protect these distinct and homogenous ethnicities, I have no objection.  If the answer is wider than that, and involves a further political process I am viscerally opposed.

It seems panglossian to imagine that the ‘sole purpose’ of a National Europe should be to be protect the distinct and homogenous ethnicities within Europe’s nation states. That can only be a part of the motivation for entering into such a project. Without a ‘further political process’ to buttress such arrangements and to provide for sufficient external defences against the forces that would undo the process - global capitalism and egalitarian universalism being the principal existential threats - each nation state could be picked off at will by a wily and ruthless adversary.

It seems quite clear that the price for preserving ethnic homogenity will be have to be some loss of national sovereignty. We are individually too puny to survive in an increasingly hostile and ruthless world.

Posted by Norman Lowell on March 28, 2010, 01:36 PM | #

A new book, just published discussing our Imperium Europa IDEA.
A planetary Imperium uniting all Europids.
The only way we can save our Race and Civilisation.

http://www.amazon.com/Norman-Lowell-Pan-European-Caucasian-Spirituality/dp/6130387008/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1269415567&sr=8-2

Posted by U.R. on March 30, 2010, 03:34 AM | #

Well, Vladivostok was actually an imperial conquest.

Posted by sepia on March 02, 2011, 03:41 AM | #

Some videos of Vladivostok
Vladivostok film

Posted by Leon Haller on March 02, 2011, 06:44 PM | #

This EUROPEAN ACTION is not only a socialist organization, it is much weaker on immigration and Islam than your average American conservative. I liked Oswald Mosely, but these people are leftist jerks, draping themselves with a wee bit of patriotic finery.