Government Cheese

Kievsky as guest blogger:

I’ve been waiting for a reason to use this as a blog post title, and this alternet article gave me a priceless quote illustrating exactly this truism.

Newsweek had another cover, “Thinking Man’s Guide to Populism,” and I remember this feeling around the country, that people were just furious. Somehow the right captured the sense of anger. They completely captured it. You could say they had no right to it, but they did. And one of the reasons they were able to do it was because the liberals were not interested in that anger.

I’m speaking here of the liberal culture in Washington, D.C. There was no Occupy Wall Street movement [at that time] and there was only people like me on the fringes talking about it. The liberals had their leader in Barack Obama … they had their various people in Congress. But these people are completely unfamiliar with populist anger. It’s an alien thing to them. They don’t trust it, and they have trouble speaking to it. I like Barack Obama, but at the end of the day he’s a very professorial kind of guy. The liberals totally missed the opportunity, and the right was able to grab it.

Looking back on it, I feel like people like myself were part of the problem. We sort of assumed with the Democrats in power, the system would correct itself.

One of the problems with liberalism in this country is that it’s headquartered in Washington and its leaders are a very comfortable class of people. Washington is one of the richest cities in the country, maybe the richest. It’s not a place that feels the crisis, that feels the economic downturn. By and large, the real estate market stayed OK. The city continued to boom. The contracts continued to flow. What we’re talking about here is the failure of modern liberalism. At one time it was a movement of working-class people. The idea that liberals wouldn’t feel economic pain was ridiculous. That’s who liberals were. No more.

In other words, liberals are made out of government cheez whiz, lots of it liberally slathered over them. These are the people who handed over convenience stores to Indians and Pakistanis, the cab driving to Africans and Middle Easterners, the graduate schools to the Chinese, and the racial destinies of many white family lines to non-white DNA. “Anybody but Whites” is the liberal battlecry. They want to diminish us, and elect a new people, while feathering their filthy rat nests.

And now it’s their end game. This is the year that the Ponzi fails.

Another juicy quote:

So [the right] is constantly talking about this infernal elite that controls government, controls corporations, and controls the academy, and that we have to wrench ourselves free.

So maybe it is true that the Obama technocracy is the infernal elite. Maybe not in the hellish way it is portrayed on the right, but in the sense that these are the defenders of bailouts, the defenders of the system

Exactly. Civil rights lawyers, affirmative action officers, Marxist tenured professors: these are the infernal elite, dogmatic anti-white moralizing busybodies: often employing cheap illegal labor even though they are financially comfortable. And they are terrible tippers.

These parasitic busybody niches will dry up. When these scum have to work for a living, we Whites will be FREE!

One last great quote:

The right has discovered the magic against relativism. They have long inveighed against relativism, but now they’ve discovered they can say anything. They can endlessly withdraw into this world of utopian fiction and everything can be explained away. It’s like some kid discovering a new video game. It’s so awesome.

This is just counter Mindweaponization against the utopian fiction of multiracial harmony and Jewish moral superiority. The Left has been explaining away black on white rape and violence and Jewish hypocritical chutzpah for decades. We can do some “explaining away” of our own.

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 at 01:09 PM in
Comments (8) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Je le vois, mais je ne le crois pas! on January 03, 2012, 03:05 PM | #

Of course liberalism isn’t something restricted to gay activists and Bill Clinton…liberal political theory and radical liberal values along with a fundamental belief in maximally understood ‘individual freedom’ have shaped America from the get-go.

Who really cares for secondary arguments between right-liberals and left-liberals?

Posted by Marwinsing on January 03, 2012, 04:55 PM | #

A belated year to EVERYBODY at M.R.

(listen to ALL THE FUCKING TRACKS children, M)

Posted by Marwinsing on January 03, 2012, 04:58 PM | #

http://marwinsing-marwinsing.blogspot.com/2012/01/happy-new-year-brighter-death-now-b-c-d.html

Posted by Leon Haller on January 03, 2012, 05:19 PM | #

Je le vois,

That you, Graham?

Posted by danielj on January 03, 2012, 05:31 PM | #

liberal political theory and radical liberal values along with a fundamental belief in maximally understood ‘individual freedom’ have shaped America from the get-go.

Who really cares for secondary arguments between right-liberals and left-liberals?

Yea Graham.

Rousseau was from Massachusetts…

Posted by Robert Reis on January 03, 2012, 09:12 PM | #

Maybe someone should ask if Andrea Mitchell is too Jewish to be giving opinions on national television about the undesirability of a white-majority state.
Mitchell herself is a product of the openness of white Christian America that allowed her non-Christian ancestors to come to this country. And how does she repay the debt? By declaring that white Christian America is illegitimate and insisting that it go out of existence.
I repeat what I’ve said before: if America had known when it began admitting mass Jewish immigration in the 1880s that the children and grandchildren of those immigrants would declare that because America had admitted European Jewish immigrants, it had a moral obligation to admit unlimited, non-European immigration to the end of time, would America have allowed in those Jewish immigrants?

Of course not.

And if America had known that the children and grandchildren of those Jewish immigrants would declare that white majority Christian America is illegitimate and that the only way for America to become morally legitimate would be for it to transform itself into a nonwhite country through mass nonwhite immigration, would America have allowed in those Jewish immigrants?

Of course not.

As I’ve also argued, if mainstream, respected white gentiles began saying things like this, it would push back the anti-majority Jews and they would realize that they can’t run America according to their anti-majority ethnic agenda. This would not be anti-Semitism. It would be the majority (like a parent who has given up his authority over his children and now realizing what a mistake he has made) asserting once again its authority as the majority and saying to a minority, “You’re out of line. Stop it.”

But it doesn’t remotely occur to any members of the majority to speak this way. Why? Is it because they are whipped by PC and fear of Jewish disapproval? No. It is because, whether they realize it or not, they themselves share the same liberal, anti-white premises as the Jews and everyone else in our society. America subscribes to suicidal liberalism, and that is why it is going down and deserves to go down, unless it radically changes course.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at January 03, 2012 07:59 PM

Posted by Guessedworker on January 05, 2012, 08:30 PM | #

Kievsky is now officially on the slate. Or will be when I mail him in a few moments!

Posted by commonwealth contrarian on January 11, 2012, 03:04 PM | #

I love the way this liberal commentator tries to equate populism with liberalism.

Does he have imagine the world is full of angry proles and small business owners clutching copies of JS Mill’s On Liberty?

The masses are tribal, liberalism is anti-tribal. Liberalism is imposed on the masses by elites, not the other way around.

Also, why is that everywhere in the white world convinience stores are own by Asians? For example, as far as I know, Canada, Australia and New Zealand don’t have skilled immigration slots for convinience store operators, so why do Asians always end up running their convinience stores?

Next entry: A Nation Rejoices: Justice at Last!

Previous entry: On Ron Paul as controlled opposition and why he would be best for President of the United States

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa