Gun Control

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on July 15, 2006, 10:12 PM | #

SVY,notice the NEGRO has his eyes closed as he’s firing-saw a lot of that in Nam[unless they had already boogied] Semper Fi !

Posted by Lurker on July 15, 2006, 10:57 PM | #

And youve got to love the way he’s holding the rifle (AK47?) away from him, just in case there was any danger of actually shooting straight.

I presume he is shooting at someone with a similar “fighting” style. What would happen if they came up against people who used those pesky sight thingys I wonder.

Posted by Al Ross on July 16, 2006, 12:48 AM | #

Given the unconventional Congoid shooting technique, I’m surprised that they manage to kill one another in such impressive numbers.  The savage in the photograph looks about as proficient as an Abo with an abacus.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on July 16, 2006, 06:22 AM | #

It’s a Chinese SKS-simular to the AK-47,but more cheaply constructed-maybe defining his marksmanship style.LOL

Posted by Guessedworker on July 16, 2006, 07:31 AM | #

Nick,

Am I right in concluding that the reason the idiot has his eyes shut is because he doesn’t want his cataract surgery to come by way of spent cartridge discharge?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 16, 2006, 10:10 AM | #

Why there’s gun control:  an illustration (from the People’s Soviet Socialist Republic of Canuckistan) of the mentality of the kind of useful idiot, mainly clueless women and effeminate men, whom the government relies on as allies in ramming gun confiscation and the outlawing of self defense and home defense down the population’s throat as it fills our countries with non-whites who attack us then forbids us to defend ourselves, our homes, or our loved ones:

Gosh, a little while ago, in grade 1, my son pointed his finger and said ‘bang’ to a classmate, and I got a call from the school.  I had to meet with the teacher to discuss the problem.  My son then apologized because the boy he said it to was really afraid and upset.  Okay.  I can handle that, and I don’t want anyone to be afraid or upset, but I have to admit that I was somewhat agog at this new breed of boy:  one who is so protected that he would be afraid of another boy who pointed his finger and said ‘bang.’  I mean I do get it (school shootings and all that), but my son has no clue about school shootings; he was just playing good guy, bad guy, and he was the cop. [...]

The next day there was an announcement about no pretend guns (finger ones, or pencil stick ones, or any kind) at school. [...]

At many schools they are constraining little boys and girls with their draconian policies.  Imagine, they’re not allowed to run in the playground!  Because, d’huh, someone might get hurt.  Well, these little boys like to play games where they run and chase each other, and sometimes they run onto the playground [...], and when they do, the teachers send them to the wall and they aren’t allowed to play anymore during that recess.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on July 16, 2006, 02:56 PM | #

Nick, I can’t tell if his eyes are closed, but if you want to see the phenomenon in the photo enshrined in film, rent the hilariously funny I’m Gonna Get You Sucka.  There’s a scene lampooning precisely that firing posture, it’s a riot.  IGGYS is the best send-up of black behavior I’ve ever seen.

Posted by ben tillman on July 16, 2006, 10:20 PM | #

What would happen if they came up against people who used those pesky sight thingys I wonder.

LOL!  Well done, Lurker.

Posted by ben tillman on July 16, 2006, 11:14 PM | #

Why there’s gun control:  an illustration (from the People’s Soviet Socialist Republic of Canuckistan) of the mentality of the kind of useful idiot, mainly clueless women and effeminate men, whom the government relies on as allies in ramming gun confiscation and the outlawing of self defense….

Each of us has a right to life.  The right to life implies a right of self-defense.  The right of defense implies a right to possess the means of self-defense.  This is all logically unassailable but some cannot overcome the propaganda.

Two years ago I argued the point with a young Englishman in Cancun, Mexico.  A stranger—a Fort Worth native—argued from “common sense” while I—a Dallas transplant—argued from natural rights and the rights of Englishmen.  The 20-year-old university student was not swayed.

The proponents of citizen disarmament argue that the great unwashed masses are not responsible enough to bear arms.  But they are responsible enough to choose, through elections, those who may bear arms.

Posted by JB on July 16, 2006, 11:20 PM | #

Lurker:

I presume he is shooting at someone with a similar “fighting” style.

http://www.hellinahandbasket.net/archives/002718.html

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on July 18, 2006, 11:49 AM | #

JB-Another marksmanship style favored by Blacks in Nam-again,if in fact they hadn’t already boogied.

Posted by A. Windaus on July 19, 2006, 04:24 AM | #

JB: Thanks for that link, best laugh in days! =D