Holocaust denier draws 160,000 votes

Posted by PCA on June 09, 2006, 04:52 PM | #

Maybe this has been discussed before, but if:

The holocaust was only 150 people - would that change our position?

The holocaust was 50 000 000 people - would that change our position?

?????

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on June 09, 2006, 05:09 PM | #

No.  But, the body count of THE HOLOCAUST is germane.  It goes something like this: white (and only white) ethnocentrism is the start of a slippery slope that leads inevitably to millions of dead (jews).  Ergo, white ethnocentrism must be destroyed.

Since people (in general) respond better to emotionalism than logic, correcting the body counts may be a good idea for us if it directly reduces the emotional impact of THE HOLOCAUST.  Of course, for those with properly-trained and able minds the point of contention should be the slippery slope fallacy.

Then there’s the fact that people caught in lies tend to lose credibility in direct proportion to the size and shamelessness of their lies.

Posted by Sigurd on June 09, 2006, 06:11 PM | #

“Potok, editor of the center’s quarterly magazine on hate groups, said he doesn’t believe 162,628 Alabama citizens would knowingly vote for a white supremacist and Neo-Nazi. He called Darby “a very lonely man” who recently fell from favor with his white supremacist buddies after they found out he once married a Chinese woman and fathered two of her children.”

They use as slander the very things they endorse.  Apparently they’ve also circulated a rumor that Nick Griffin is a homosexual.  The veracity of either of these claims is unknown to me and, frankly, irrelevant (though Griffin being a closet gay seems beyond dubious.)  Yet its the type of thing they think will effect the base of voters.  Slimy little s**ts.

Posted by TomS on June 09, 2006, 06:19 PM | #

A story like this is good medicine for those who claim that Americans will never accept anti-Jewism. I see that MR has some Jews constantly whining, “oy, don’t be anti-semitic, just be anti-negro”. Wrong, Hymie, you can not snowboard down this avalanche.

Posted by Sigurd on June 09, 2006, 06:23 PM | #

The theory that none of the voters knew the candidates…hmmmm…wishful thinking (and calculated propaganda: “don’t get the idea that someone else thinks like you”) or is it really the case that the voting population is so woefully uninformed that the democratic election is an arbitrary and potentially dangerous way of appointing government officials.  What would they have us believe? Neither conclusion speaks well of the present system. I think the SPLC and friends are scared.  You can bet the average Jew is not interested in driving through Alabama any time soon.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on June 09, 2006, 06:37 PM | #

Sigurd: yes, win-win.  Either 160k voters are WNs, or they don’t mind WNs, or they’re so indifferent they’ll vote for anybody.  Regardless it doesn’t bode well for the SPLC (a known hate group, btw).  I guess they picked the lesser of the evils (voters are ignorant).

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on June 09, 2006, 06:41 PM | #

Oh, btw, I LOVE when the MSM quotes the SPLC; each and every such straight-faced quotation is a ticking credibility-bomb for the publisher.

Posted by Sigurd on June 09, 2006, 07:54 PM | #

“Oh, btw, I LOVE when the MSM quotes the SPLC”

Yes, the increased visibility of the SPCL and the other Orwellian thought control ministries has been a public relations disaster without equal.  I guess there is such a thing as bad publicity, but apparently not when you’re a rolly-polly, moderately well spoken, unknown Holocaust denier running for political office in Alabama.  With the ADL, SPLC and ACLU, on the otherhand, bad publicity is simply a matter of having publicity.

And they can’t be totally unaware of this.  It must be such a dilemma, having such a rod up your butt, with the first instinct to moralize and condemn, while in the back of your mind knowing that your witch hunting days are numbered, maybe something like the smoker who just can’t quit. After all, what identity do these whiners have if they are not whining?  Life must be intolerable without it.

Posted by JB on June 09, 2006, 10:56 PM | #

Svi:

Oh, btw, I LOVE when the MSM quotes the SPLC; each and every such straight-faced quotation is a ticking credibility-bomb for the publisher.

Pooftok hasn’t found a way to package his absurd message of ‘Oh no, nobody in their right mind would ever vote for a an antisemitic pro-white candidate, that’s impossible, but racism is still a terrible problem in this country and we need your money to fight it’ with the right words he still sounds like a idiot.

Potok, editor of the center’s quarterly magazine on hate groups, said he doesn’t believe 162,628 Alabama citizens would knowingly vote for a white supremacist and Neo-Nazi.
(...)
Potok, though, noted that racist ideology is still a problem in Alabama. For example, 40 percent of Alabamians and a majority of whites in 2003 voted against removing the interracial marriage ban language in the state constitution, he said.

hilarious!

How come no one before Darby decided to run on a pro-white message in Alabama ?

Sigurd:

The veracity of either of these claims is unknown to me and, frankly, irrelevant

Darby being the father of two half-chinese children isn’t irrelevant and is embarassing because to my knowledge he hasn’t issued a statement saying he made a mistake in the past and that he changed his mind now about race and all that and although I consider race-mixing to be a crime and that the perpetrators should be expulsed out of the country and banished for life and even unto death I would have supported Darby had I been living near or in Alabama because he’s 110% against illegals and he wants to shut down the SPLC.

I think what the voters knew about Darby is mainly what he said he would do about the mexican invasion. I predict that any candidate that opposes the invasion in the strongest terms possible will win a majority of the white vote no matter in which state he is.

Posted by Sigurd on June 10, 2006, 04:11 AM | #

I don’t support race mixing either, obviously. That’s rule one.  But if the guy had a former life and is making amends…I support a man’s policies.  He is nothing to me but his policies. And this one apparently doesn’t skimp on any of the pro-white positions.  According to his statements to the press he’s for a white America (thus, by definition, opposed to race mixing)-that he was having children with Asians is not ideal (and weakens him as an ideal), but would this cause any sane WN to vote against him and for his opposition?  Considered in this light, his dalliances with Asians, are irrelevant.

Posted by Sigurd on June 10, 2006, 04:37 AM | #

“because to my knowledge he hasn’t issued a statement saying he made a mistake in the past and that he changed his mind now about race”

Perhaps he made a political decision not to address the charge.  If its brought up once by a political enemy, why bring it up twice?  Why allow the focus to remain on your own weakness?  Though perhaps a poor example (because no one making the charge has “mainstream credibility”) why, for instance, would Abe Foxman ever respond to the charge that he’s a racist Zionist hypocrite?  Maybe some charges (whether true or not) are better ignored.  Does David Duke have anything to gain from discussing his “alleged” plastic surgery?  It is still, after all, politics.

Posted by wjm on June 20, 2006, 01:49 PM | #

162628 voters are ignorant? - maybe 162628 voters can read and use the internet. The “Holocaust” is falling apart scientifically. If the pro-Holocaust crowd was sure and not schrill, they would grab some shovels and prove there claims - never have, never will .....can’t.