![]() |
Home grown terroristsI have not voted for the BNP todate. But in this hour of terrorist mass murder, it is only Griffin who seems to be talking sense in this country. The establishment (which includes the useless Tories) has dug its head deeper into the sand and stuck out its posterior royally for the next assault by the determined enemy. So I have decided to reproduce Nick Griffin’s article from the BNP’s web site today. Please read it with an open mind - whatever your party/ideological affiliation. In it you shall see a clarity of mind at work that is conspicuous by its absence in this country’s establishment. _________________ 13th July 2005 I made that prediction at a private BNP meeting in the Reservoir Tavern in Keighley on 19th January 2004 – 18 months before the multiple Islamic suicide bombings which police last night admitted were carried out by second generation Pakistanis from Leeds and Dewsbury. By now, every newspaper and TV and radio station in the country will have reported these facts. So, 18 months on, it emerges that I was nine miles out, and that, by not predicting that the terrorists would be suicide bombers, I under-estimated their fanaticism. But as a piece of prophesy it was surely better than your average Whittaker’s Almanac, and streets ahead of anything from any other modern British politician, with the honourable exception of Enoch Powell, who was too far away from events to see them through anything other than a glass very darkly and wasn’t anything like so specific. The crucial question, however, is whether I should face seven years in prison for making that prediction? For that is the situation in which I find myself. Next Thursday, 21st July, I must answer bail at Leeds Crown Court on charges of using words “intended or, having regards to all the circumstances, likely, to incite racial hatred.” One of the key points in the opening case summary that the prosecution supplied to Leeds Magistrates Court earlier this year was the claim that, by making the prediction at the start of this article, I either intended to incite, or was likely to incite, racial hatred. Winning the Muslim vote These charges were brought on the decision of the Labour appointed Attorney General, under a law which states explicitly that “telling the truth is no defence.” That decision was publicised right at the official start of the General Election campaign, in a blatant piece of New Labour spin designed partly to demonise the BNP in the eyes of white voters, but mainly to claw back the Muslim vote by giving their ‘community leaders’ my head on a plate. So untold (so far) thousands of taxpayers’ money were spent on a team of police officers doing nothing for months except investigating the findings of an agent provocateur and paid liar and spy - working for the Government-funded BBC – who had infiltrated a local branch of the BNP which was being run as a ‘rogue’ operation by another man who was also in the pay of close allies of the Labour Government. And, as a result of all that grotesque use of taxpayers’ money, and because I was “secretly” filmed making that prediction (which I would just have readily made in public had the BBC merely asked for a proper interview and thereby secured the footage for a fraction of the cost) I now face up to seven years in prison for making an uncannily accurate prediction. Of course, the CPS are complaining about other things I said as well. They object to my referring to the way in which sections of the Koran help provide the climate and the ‘justification’ for the worldwide problem whereby a minority of young Muslim men become sexual predators against young girls from other communities. Channel 4 broadcast The fact that this is true; the fact that Muslims are not even covered by the anti-free speech Race Laws; the fact that Channel 4’s Edge of the City programme publicised the extent of this problem in Keighley to millions of TV viewers, whereas I was speaking to a mere 70 or so people – none of that mattered to the New Labour CPS when they decided to “get the Muslim vote by giving them Griffin.” The CPS case summary says that, in the two speeches in question: “Griffin draws the distinction between Asians and non-Asians, which is insulting to Asians.” On that basis, every newspaper report on minority crime, and every piece of police radio traffic and internal documentation concerning such crime, is “insulting” to the minority from which the suspects in question are drawn. If applied to ‘wanted’ reports and the police, such a situation would make it impossible to describe and identify criminals – obviously a bad thing. If applied to political debate, it would make it impossible to discuss certain problems in our society – obviously a bad thing, especially when the problems so put beyond the possibility of discussion would be the circumstances in West Yorkshire towns that lead 18 and 20-year-old middle class kids to become suicide bombers. Finally – and this points really are all the ‘case’ against me which the CPS has – I spoke at another private BNP meeting in Morley Town Hall about the way in which the police and the media turn a blind eye to anti-white racist violence – including murder - by some Muslim youths. The CPS claim that this shows that I wanted to incite ‘hatred’. Of course, I did not. But I did want to galvanise our activists for one last push just before the then forthcoming council elections to help us get the political representation that would help us to force the media and the police to acknowledge that ‘racism cuts both ways,’ as a first essential step to getting the violence stopped. Going wrong This brings me back to tonight’s shocking news, and the professed ‘shock’ among Establishment and ‘moderate’ Muslim commentators. “How, they ask, could some young Muslim men go so wrong?” Well, maybe these people are exceptionally stupid, or maybe they’re wilfully blind, but to me it’s very plain, so let me spell out the key factors: Anti-British propaganda First, the endless anti-white, anti-British propaganda put out in the National Curriculum and on TV has helped to give hundreds of thousands of young Muslims whopping great chips on their shoulders; Second, the grotesque Islamophilia of so much of the British establishment - particularly in the media, education system and politics – is such that Islam is almost universally portrayed as the only religion with passion and truth on its side. From ‘Piss Christ’ sculptures to TV sitcoms, a supposedly Christian society allows everything from blatant blasphemy to good-natured humour to send out a message that it doesn’t care about its own religious heritage. Where, on the other hand, is the Islamic ‘Father Ted’? Is it any wonder that a growing number of youngsters are attracted by the uncompromising “This alone is the Way to Salvation” message of Islam? Left-liberals who openly sneer and laugh at anyone who still admits to believing in the Holy Trinity or the Resurrection manage to fall over themselves to praise the wholly unWesternised tenets of Islam, despite the fact that, if they unleashed their atheistic critical faculties on it in the same way they do Christianity, they would almost certainly write it off as a mutated moon god cult. Perhaps they do in private – does anyone really believe that those sophisticates at the Guardian and BBC would give the time of day to any god save their own bank balances? - but their unhealthy fixation with all things Third World prevents them saying so. All of which means that a message goes out to agitated young Muslims: “Of course we must believe in Allah – even the powerful kuffars understand that He is special.” Wonder why they take Him seriously enough to kill in His name? Blame the atheists who put on ‘Islam Awareness Week’. Arranged marriages Second, because successive Governments have allowed several generations of young Muslim men to bring in uneducated arranged brides from Third World countries, the Western education and integration that would have helped to combat extremism in their community has been constantly undermined; PC policing Third, Politically Correct policing and crime reporting in newspapers has created among large numbers of young Muslims the impression that they are “Untouchables”. The blind eye or understanding slap on the wrist applies from minor misdemeanours such as littering, spitting or hurling racist abuse at passing whites, through vandalism, stoning fire engines and beating up white boys, through to sexually assaulting white girls, pushing heroin and murder. To give a current and particularly bad example: Several weeks before the General Election we provided Keighley police with the name (and other evidence) of the young Muslim thug who has spent months strutting the streets of that town boasting that he stabbed to death Sean Whyte in nearby Colne in an unprovoked racist murder on Sean’s eighteenth birthday. What have they done about it? Nothing, absolutely nothing, despite the fact that we have also given them other information to go on. (In the transcript of my speech for the court, incidentally, the police couldn’t even spell his name correctly, but put down ‘Shaun White’. Can you imagine how many heads would have rolled in McPherson had found Met records speaking of “Steven Lorenz?) What message goes out to thoughtful young men coming of age in the Muslim community? “This society is sick, it doesn’t even care about its own people, let alone us Muslims, whether in Iraq or in Britain. We should bring it down and build a better world in its place.” This brings us to what should be the really scary thing for the liberal elite – the bombers probably won’t even come from the drug-pushing, car-twocking, pimping criminals among the Muslim community. After all, they’re still happily pushing drugs, stealing cars and enjoying the benefits from their whores. I’ll make another prediction – that most if not all of the bombers and their close associates will be brighter than average, even originally more decent than average, Muslim kids, who first turned to the Koran out of despair at the squalid criminality around them, in the wreckage of the liberal permissive society in general, and their own petty gangster-ridden communities in particular. The Koran Which brings me to the fourth piece of the jigsaw that makes a Muslim boy who could have become a teacher or a chemical engineer become a suicide bomber: the Koran and associated teachings. Let me repeat what I said on Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday morning: The Koran has some tolerant verses, but they are outweighed by ones which are either blatantly intolerant and full of hate towards unbelievers or – to be charitable – can be interpreted as intolerant and full of hate towards unbelievers. It is not a Book of Peace but a handbook for conquering other peoples’ countries – through a combination of example, persuasion, guile, coercion and naked violence. Until the Muslim Council of Britain and their fellow ‘moderates’ accept this, and at least try to address, condemn and reform away the elements that ‘justify’ coercion and violence, then their insistence that the only methods by which it is acceptable to spread Islam are example and persuasion must be taken as springing from guile rather than sincerity and truth. And, whatever their real motivation, all the expressions of shock and bewilderment from the MCB won’t stop the three or four groups of awestruck fifteen and sixteen-year-old British-born Muslims who are sitting on three or four street corners in different British towns tonight discussing the heroic martyrdom of four lads just a few years older than them and deciding – tonight, yes, tonight - to follow in their footsteps. Paramilitary activity Which brings us to the fifth, and final, part of the jigsaw. When a group like the West Yorkshire suicide bombers (and bear in mind that they are not the first Islamic ‘Shahids’ that Britain has produced, although up until now we’ve exported them before they’ve gone off) comes together, it is inconceivable that they could make the move from law-abiding spotty nerds to committed suicide bombers without stages in between. About 18 months ago several farmers and other locals brought to the attention of both Dewsbury BNP and police the fact that a group of “young Asian men” had been seen doing paramilitary training in nearby woods. Nothing, as far as we know, was ever done about it because, of course, the heads of West Yorkshire police are among the most Politically Correct, terrified-of-another-riot, New Labour brown-nosing cretins in the country (and that, believe me, is really saying something). If that was the first sign of this home-grown cell (and if it was a different group then it just means that there are more potential ‘martyrs’ out there in Dewsbury alone), then had the police kept watch for a couple of nights, arrested boys who at the time would have been still at school, and taken them back home for a good paternal hiding, then they would probably have been frightened off and gone back to being computer nerds. Turning a blind eye to the camouflage kit and replica AK47s in the woods might well have signed the death warrants not just of those innocent Londoners, but of their murderers as well. And wicked though they grew and died, not so long ago they weren’t, and to four grieving mothers tonight they still aren’t and never will be. But is there not still a big jump between playing soldiers in the woods and blowing up tube trains? Yes, and here too the pathetic reaction of the police to anti-white violence may be the missing link to explain “how they could have ended up like that.” Inciting violence against kuffars It is now at least four years since Channel 4 produced a remarkably brave film, also using secretly shot footage, entitled ‘Islam in Burnley’. Among the truly shocking footage shown was Abu Hamza speaking to a large and enthusiastic audience in a Burnley mosque. He could clearly be heard telling his overwhelmingly young and British-born audience that it is their religious duty to kill ‘kuffars’ (the traditional Muslim term by which Unbelievers are dehumanised before being subjugated or killed), and that the best way to develop the skills and the nerve to do so is to start small by putting on a balaclava and going out and punching a passing white in the face, while taking up martial arts training so as to be able to “rip out their throats”. Needless to say, while I have to appear in Leeds Crown court at 9.30 a.m. on Thursday 21st to face up to seven years for telling the truth, no charges have ever been brought against Abu Hamza for inciting young Muslims to go and “lay one on a kuffar” as a stepping stone to learning how to kill the filthy Unbelievers “without wasting a bullet”. Hamza, and others like him, have made hate-filled ‘sermons’ like that in an untold number of mosques and Islamic community centres all over the country for years, to a tight-knit and inward-looking population whose community grapevine and sense of group cohesion is almost incomprehensibly tight by Western standards. For the Government, police and ‘moderate’ Muslim community leaders to have let the “handful of extremists” get away with this for so long has guaranteed disaster. Real concerted action now might help, but it may well be too late to cut out the cancer, because the Hamzas and the Bakris have such ‘street-cred’ among so many young Muslims, and the still half-hearted steps that will be taken to deal with them by our cowardly Islamophile establishment will only build up their hero status even further. We may never know if this gang cut their teeth in terms of law-breaking and confidence in themselves and each other in the way Hamza was allowed to advocate, but it is a fact that Savile Town and Thornhill in Dewsbury, like a number of other predominantly Muslim areas in West Yorkshire and other parts of Britain, has effectively been a ‘No-Go Area’ for young whites (unless they are junkies or prostitutes) for several years at least. So there is no need to pulp vast numbers of trees and waste rivers of ink in the debate as to how nerdy or nice second generation Pakistani boys mutate into suicide bombers. And neither is there any point at all going out looking for the next generation of same to beat up by way of ‘revenge’. All that would do is to create more grievances that would lead even more down the same terrible road. Political elite to blame No! The people to blame for the indoctrination in the media and the schools are the political elite. The people to blame for the arranged marriage conveyor belt that imports an endless stream of ignorance and alienation are the political elite. The people to blame for the untouchable status of ethnic minority criminals are the political elite. The people to blame for the continuation of the intolerant strands in Islam - even more than the ‘moderates’ who refuse to address the problem - are the political elite. Their endless bleating about how “Islam and terrorism are not connected” merely serves to help the ‘moderates’ blame everything on Islamophobia and avoid taking responsibility for every aspect of their theological heritage and courting unpopularity by speaking out against the institutionalised anti-kuffar bigotry that besmirches their religion. And the political elite are the people to blame for the refusal to clamp down on hardliners like Abu Hamza, or on the early stages of militancy by those who are swept away by their rhetoric and the devastating but comforting simplicity of their message. Political response So, to conclude, to everyone who reads this article over the coming days of anger, pain and shock, the BNP’s message is this: The problem we face is our own political elite. Violence against Muslims would merely give that political elite the excuse they crave to clamp down on those of us who are challenging their death-grip on British politics. Problems caused by bad decisions by politicians can only be changed by good decisions by other politicians. The only way to make that happen is by changing the politicians, and the only way to do that is by organised, sustained and intelligent political action. That is the only way out of this deadly mess. That is what the British National Party exists to do. But to do it quickly enough to avert catastrophe, we need your help. Posted by Phil Peterson on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 at 03:45 PM in Immigration, Islam & Islamification, War on Terror Comments:2
Posted by Geoff Beck on July 13, 2005, 04:31 PM | # Phil, or GW: I’d like to send some money to the BNP. I know, this is my not affair, not my country, and I shouldn’t stick my nose into other people’s affairs. So, pardon me if I have offended sensibilities. Anyway, I’ve looked their webpage over, and can’t seem to figure it out. Can one of you guys call their offices and find out how, or if, this can be done? Post the directions, I’m sure many Americans would be interested in helping the old country. BNP oughtn’t to get too excited, I won’t make them rich, a small donation to be sure. I inquired by email, once, but got no reply. Probably thought I was a quack, or MI5. But is someone if fighting I’m damn sure going assist. I suppose the same thing could be asked of Johann Van Vlaam, and Vlaams Belang. Plenty of Americans are watching Flanders, and the Netherlands area. 3
Posted by Phil on July 13, 2005, 04:38 PM | # I know, this is my not affair, not my country, and I shouldn’t stick my nose into other people’s affairs. So, pardon me if I have offended sensibilities. What a load of rubbish! Your ancestors came from Britain, Geoff. You are infinitely more British than our imported population that has been given British passports and refer to themselves as “Britons”. The BNP cannot accept money directly from non-UK nationals as that’s against the law but you can give money to a group called Civil Liberty and that’s within the law. See here. 4
Posted by Geoff Beck on July 13, 2005, 04:55 PM | # Great! You can imagine my shock if someone from Britain wanted to send the Republican Party money, of course, I think everyone, overseas at least, knows what a bunch traiters and phonies (see comments) they are. 5
Posted by john rackell on July 13, 2005, 05:05 PM | # The BNP cannot accept money directly from non-UK nationals as that’s against the law Geoff, you can absolutely give money directly to the BNP up to the amount of $200. This 200 pound sterling limit is required of anyone who is a foreign national, or a British national who is not on the electoral rolls. This is all explained here: http://www.bnp.org.uk/shopping/donations.htm The BNP takes your name as part of their required reporting to the electoral commission, accounting for who gave them money. Unfortunately they don’t SSL to take your particulars. This payment method is their preferred method because of the problem they had with banks refusing to hold their deposit accounts. I sent them a cheque last December which they never received. Very strange. Their is an address at the bottom of the link I referenced for sending donations by mail: again you have to include your name, address. Joining the BNP is also an option and you receive a lot of goodies like their newsletter etc. They are also rolling out a members only website. Phil is right about Civil Liberty, that you can give in larger amounts but the money is not used for direct political purposes. Another great way of supporting them, is to take a subscription to their monthly Voice of Freedom newspaper (circ. is about 50,000 ). You can also read some of it online http://www.bnp.org.uk/freedom/ Peopl.e here have expressed ways of taking on the MSM by creating alternatives. These guys are really doing it. Some publishers froze them out by refusing to publish it but it was a minor hiccup. http://www.bnp.org.uk/publications/publication_freedom.htm I think the political contributions are much more vital to make them political contenders. 6
Posted by Phil on July 13, 2005, 05:12 PM | # Thanks for the clarification John. I stand corrected. 7
Posted by john rackell on July 13, 2005, 05:20 PM | # Phil, my pleasure Geoff, one small point even though you divulge your name and address to the BNP they are not obliged to give it to the electoral commission. So it’s secure from prying eyes, if that sort of consideration matters to you. If you were British giving more than 200 then I believe it does become public record. 8
Posted by Phil on July 13, 2005, 05:23 PM | # Geoff, you can absolutely give money directly to the BNP up to the amount of $200. This 200 pound sterling limit is required of anyone who is a foreign national, or a British national who is not on the electoral rolls. Then the limit should be $350 because £200 = $350. 9
Posted by ben tillman on July 13, 2005, 08:00 PM | # One of the key points in the opening case summary that the prosecution supplied to Leeds Magistrates Court earlier this year was the claim that, by making the prediction at the start of this article, I either intended to incite, or was likely to incite, racial hatred. They will have to dismiss the case, will they not? It would be too much of a publicity bonanza, would it not? 10
Posted by Geoff Beck on July 13, 2005, 08:03 PM | # This is why we must help, where we can and are wanted (from VDARE): In it, London resident “Abdullah” apparently felt confident enough that he didn’t need to disguise his seditious intent: “We don’t need to fight. We are taking over!” he said. “We are here to bring civilization to the West. England does not belong to the English people, it belongs to God.” : “We don’t need to fight. We are taking over!” he said. “We are here to bring civilization to the West. England does not belong to the English people, it belongs to God .” 11
Posted by Kubilai on July 13, 2005, 08:39 PM | # I gave 200 pounds last December prior to the election. I did it through their website via Paypal. The thing is I clicked donate twice by accident and emailed them (the treasurer) if they could keep the second 200, to do so. They said they could not and refunded it. Does anyone know how often you are allowed to donate? Is it per year or per election cycle or what? 12
Posted by Andrew L on July 14, 2005, 01:24 AM | # The Pixi party (Labour), seem to be drawing away from the general Moslem issue and ramming home the ones that want to blow you up, they seem to neglect the ones that just want to shoot you and rape you, and robb you, but then they are the peacefull ones I suppose, at least they did’t blow you up, draw some comfort from that. Infidel ha . And the Best revelation is( Al Hadis,Vol 2,p.686 Ibin Masud reported. Next entry: Culture of Critique in Russian Previous entry: The Real War Has Two Fronts |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. PMP Preparation commented in entry 'Starvation to keep the masses on a leash' on 05/24/12, 03:15 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view) HoroSmutS commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) zhrcwuwmkq commented in entry 'The end of Mel Gibson's career?' on 05/23/12, 11:46 PM. (go) (view) SEO Services commented in entry 'The Cubans of Miami' on 05/23/12, 11:11 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/23/12, 10:12 PM. (go) (view) Cockouche commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 09:40 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) assundaGymn commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/23/12, 08:41 PM. (go) (view) GlablePax commented in entry 'University official sentenced for child porn, blackmail' on 05/23/12, 08:23 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) cuiseur automatique seb commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 07:43 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:23 PM. (go) (view) 7 Year BA commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 09:19 PM. (go) (view) DARYL commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 08:57 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 08:31 PM. (go) (view) Church of Jed commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 07:40 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 05:56 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 11:37 AM. (go) (view) AnalogMan commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 11:29 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:42 AM. (go) (view) Srakotraqu commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 07:30 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by john rackell on July 13, 2005, 04:22 PM | #
It’s amazing how in British history great leaders have come to the fore in Albion’s hour of gravest crisis: Churchill, Alfred the Great, Nelson.
Though the terrorist assault is not of itself that crisis, the grotesquely supine response of the British establishment is.
Nick Griffin is Churchill in his Wilderness Years. Labor will be damned if they convict him, and likely damned if they don’t.
Nick Griffin will one day be added to the pantheon of true British Greats.