Homosexualism: the Russian option

Posted by Matra on May 28, 2006, 03:06 PM | #

An interesting article on this topic at Aryan Futurism entitled ‘Proud Slavs or New World Order Slaves?’. (I found the link at Face Right)

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 28, 2006, 03:28 PM | #

Ah, good stuff!

Posted by L Stewart on May 28, 2006, 06:41 PM | #

I agree entirely with the Russian action. Homosexuality is simply a perversion, not a ‘sexual preference’ - except in the literal sense that paedophilia, necrophilia, and bestiality are also ‘preferences.’
As a direct result of the arrogance of so many homosexuals and their ‘liberal’ champions, we seem no longer to have the choice of saying that ‘consenting adults’ should be allowed to do whatever they want in private, as long as they do not advertise their activities. The demand is now that we regard such conduct as completely acceptable and even ‘natural’, and carrying with it the same rights to marry, adopt children, etc, accorded to normal, heterosexual relationships.
Most decent people would not happily choose the path of brutal repression, but are likely to see it as the lesser of two evils when faced with the alternative prospect of a completely sick society.
Many otherwise ‘harmless’ homosexuals may have cause to rue the day their aggressive cousins ‘came out of the closet.’

Posted by Søren Renner on May 28, 2006, 07:12 PM | #

Matra, thank you for the link. It’s perfect.

Posted by Al Ross on May 28, 2006, 10:29 PM | #

First the homosexualists pleaded for ‘tolerance’ which means, of course, our putting up with that which we dislike.

Then they urged ‘acceptance’ with its implicit overtones of moral equivalence.

Now the celebrating deviants appear to seek laudation in the West and, with the support of the usual suspects, they may well achieve their ruinous objective.

The Russians are wise to avoid this idiocy.

Posted by hayden on May 29, 2006, 04:57 AM | #

I agree that homosexuality is a perversion in most cases. But not all.

My sister is still quite young, in her teens, but she has all the outward physical traits and interests of a boy. She is basically a boy in a girls body. Due to the difficulties of sex change from female to male, I have no doubt she will be lesbian when she grows up.

Theres a difference between people who parade around the streets dressed in drag, and people who have the sad and tragic situation of being born the wrong gender.

Hayden

Posted by Guessedworker on May 29, 2006, 05:20 AM | #

Hayden,

The difference is politics.  Here we hold no animus against others who are not like ourselves.  We wish them well.  We extend tolerance in return for discretion.

For political - and ethnic interest - purposes homosexuality has been used to subvert our cultural norms.  We are told that it is a preference for political reasons, not because it is so.  We know this and we know it has no connection to the real tragedy of homosexual lives.

Your comment is good and true but don’t misunderstand our purpose as anything other than political.

Posted by Amalek on May 29, 2006, 03:33 PM | #

In the good old days, those who were Not As Other Men nevertheless did their duty to the race and to their bloodline: they married and fathered a couple of sprogs before rewarding themselves by spending all their time up the other alley.

Women, most of whom don’t really care about boudoir gymnastics except for the babies, gladly took to separate bedrooms and all lived fairly happily ever after in nominal wedlock.

Nowadays if you fancy rectal larceny you have to do it full time rather than ‘live a lie’ and be—horror of horrors—‘in denial’ about your ‘true’, presumed fixed nature. But it’s remarkable how many who are queer in youth spontaneously lapse into marriage and parenthood as time marches on: the male equivalent of the ageing career sow hearing her eggs rattle on the shelf. And reparative therapy can set many a misfit on the straight and narrow.

Oscar Wilde set a good example. There is much to be said for hypocrisy and concealment in all aspects of life, and in sex more than most. Patriotic pooves should find a sympathetic female, lie forward and think of England.

Posted by Alex Zeka on June 01, 2006, 01:31 PM | #

Moderation Islam-style pt 94:

The leader of the Rusian Muslim community greeted these events with the fllowing words: “Stone them! I never said stone them! I always maintained that they should be hit with tick.”

Whilst I applaud the priest’s commitment to a moderate approach, I nonetheless wonder how the mulitculti utopia of Muslims and gays can actually be achieved.

Posted by Alex Zeka on June 01, 2006, 01:33 PM | #

“hit with a stick” A tick might be impracticable.