The American Playground

Posted by seelow heights on August 02, 2005, 05:26 PM | #

“After finishing the tale the Chinese woman replied “oh those whites are so backward, and have no shame”.
I assume you told her that our current miserable state is a relatively recent development.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 05:34 PM | #

They aren’t interested in our history, or past glory. They think they are superior, and if we don’t want them to rule us we better unite, have children, fight back.

Posted by Svigor on August 02, 2005, 05:36 PM | #

Lol.  I’d've told her we were fine ‘til we started letting in the slopes.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 05:40 PM | #

Svi,

As you know I have a hard time controlling my tongue, but where I work, any comment that could be construed as pro-white would be immediate grounds for termination - it does not go the other direction.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 06:12 PM | #

Here is an interesting interview with an American Expat living in Russia, it roughly parallels the situations I face

http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukeradio11feb05.mp3
(Yes, I know it is Duke’s site, get over it).

Posted by john rackell on August 02, 2005, 06:22 PM | #

I think you were lucky with the Chinese coworker to hear such an unguarded comment. You may have become an honorary Chinese for a brief instant - you got to see things from their perspective. Such racial honesty should be encouraged by all ethnic groups, not denied - another ethnic group’s contempt is a powerful stimulus for white ethnic consciousness. Not that you needed that. Though I am surprised you frequent Chinese restaurants, per earlier posts. From amicable relations with some Chinese and seeing things from their perspective, I’ve been struck dumb by how the money flows from white hands into Chinese in one direction only, to our detriment. The money does not recirculate. I swore not to fund my own dispossession - as far as possible.

I’ve heard some unreflective whites be pulled up short by having the veil lifted. Once with a typical liberal white female reading the Sunday morning paper (Calif) she ran across the slur against assimilated Asians used by their own co-ethnics as being “Bananas - yellow on the outside, white on the inside”. She prides herself on being multicultural because she works in an office full of white people with a few Asians - the penny drops, maybe they’re dissembling. Well, back to being a bleeding heart for her.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 06:28 PM | #

John

> Chinese restaurants

I’ve been struck dumb by how the money flows from white hands into Chinese in one direction only, to our detriment

We mostly eat at home, but all we have is national chain store restaurants near where I live (probably owned by Jews).

Gosh, I am sure most of the food is grown in Mexico, and what is not grown there is probably picked by Mexicans.

Believe me, John, I hate what has happened.

Posted by john rackell on August 02, 2005, 06:55 PM | #

Geoff, hope I didn’t come across as critical - it’s just one of my pet themes and where to spend our money is our one true power, even the globalists can’t make a move on that. Well they can by extending us more credit than we can afford and reducing us to servitude, which they’re doing - but slightly off topic.

Posted by AD on August 02, 2005, 07:19 PM | #

Recently here there has been a big hoo-haa over leaked comments made by an islamic cleric stating that ‘you should not make close friends with westerners,only acquaintances’.Talk-back radio went crazy,people were outraged,shocked and offended.The average person just could not believe such ‘hate’ and ‘ungratefulness’ was in ‘our’ country(like we still have one united as they perceive it).

To us aware whites,the clerics comments are so soft,they border on friendliness.

If only they knew that this attitude,and ten times worse,is normal for just about every ethnic community here.White people have no clue how much they are hated and looked down on.

Posted by ben tillman on August 02, 2005, 07:25 PM | #

As you know I have a hard time controlling my tongue, but where I work, any comment that could be construed as pro-white would be immediate grounds for termination - it does not go the other direction.

Geoff:

I know you don’t want to play guinea pig, but such a termination would be actionable, and I think I could win such a case.  It depends on the judge, of course, but we need to be on the lookout for such cases, which not only provide an opportunity for some redress for the plaintiff (and money for further activism) but also provide an opportunity for us to educate a member of our elite.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 07:55 PM | #

John,

Oh don’t worry, I didn’t think you were being critical.  I live in a total cultural wasteland. Everything is prepackaged, and subdivided.

Though, I, like you don’t waste my money on crap, and certainly I can assure you I have no debt.

A man that has debt is a slave, now think about that one folks.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 08:00 PM | #

Ben,

I must be very careful what I say. I had to sign a contract stating that I would not blog about the company. I try to take notes about the things I must endure, and, maybe, when they dispose of me I’ll have something to say.

I really wish I could be candide with everyone here at MR.

Posted by ben tillman on August 02, 2005, 08:25 PM | #

Please don’t blog about your company.  That would be unwise.  However, when an opportunity for legal activism presents itself to you, please let me know.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 02, 2005, 08:31 PM | #

Thanks Ben.

Posted by Stuka on August 02, 2005, 09:21 PM | #

White people have no clue how much they are hated and looked down on.

However, non-whites also greatly fear & envy us. Regarding the latter, I’ve met many Hispanic, Oriental, and Subcon girls who admit they want blond, blue-eyed children.

Posted by Rational Islamophobe on August 03, 2005, 12:43 AM | #

John, that is an excellent idea, one I am putting into practice.

No debt, no funding of ethnic restaurants, buying cheap generics wherever there is no good White altenative. All of these function to amplify our power.

Another thing: never sell an ethnic any real estate, ever.

Posted by Pericles on August 03, 2005, 04:30 AM | #

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4740633.stm

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis is calling on the government to scrap its “outdated” policy of multiculturalism.

Allowing people of different cultures to settle without integrating let the “perverted values of suicide bombers” take root, he told the Daily Telegraph.

Mr Davis, favourite to become the next Tory leader, urged the government to “build a single nation” and demand “respect for the British way of life”.

“We must speak openly of what we expect of those who settle here,” he said.

Mr Davis’ remarks came as Home Office minister Hazel Blears met Muslim leaders in Oldham in the first of a series of meetings to discuss concerns following the London bombings.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, he said Muslims had to “root out” imams who failed to “understand the conventions of British society”.

Searching questions now have to be asked about what has been happening inside Britain’s Muslim communities

“We must acknowledge there are good imams and bad imams,” Mr Davis added.

He strongly criticised Birmingham Central Mosque chairman Mohammed Naseem for focusing his anger on the security services rather than the London bombers after one of the suspected terrorists was arrested in the city.

“Searching questions now have to be asked about what has been happening inside Britain’s Muslim communities.

“The authorities have seemed more concerned with encouraging distinctive identities than with promoting common cultural values of nationhood.”

Mr Davis called for a new border control police force to secure Britain’s “porous” borders.

The process of granting British citizenship should be “urgently reviewed”, he said.

The government should allow evidence from phone-taps to be used in court, Mr Davis added.

And ministers should review the Human rights Act “advocating its repeal if necessary”.

Pericles

Posted by Guessedworker on August 03, 2005, 12:08 PM | #

Pericles,

As a student of the absurd I know you will appreciate this bad luck story of a fellow countryman.  We “Britons” must stick together.

Posted by john rackell on August 03, 2005, 06:34 PM | #

However, when an opportunity for legal activism presents itself to you, please let me know.
- Ben Tillman

Ben, in case you don’t check Amren there’s a great exclusive story on the site about a guy, one J. Moritz, who tried to trademark the term “White Pride” and was turned down by the USPTO, notwithstanding other “Pride” trademarks:

“African Pride,” “African Man Pride,” “Asian Pride,” “Bahama Pride,” “Black Pride,” “Brazilian Pride,” “China-Pride,” “Chippewa Pride,” “Choctaw Pride,” “Colombian Pride,” “Cuban Pride,” “Dakota Pride,” “Dominican Pride,” “El Salvador Pride,” “Ecuador Pride,” “Gay Pride Apparel,” “Guyanese Pride,” “Havana Pride,” “Honduran Pride,” “Indian Pride,” “Jamaica’s Pride,” “Jewish Pride,” “Kwanzaa Pride,” “Long Beach Lesbian and Gay Pride,” “Mayan Pride,” “Mexican Pride,” “Native Pride!,” “Nicaraguan Pride,” “Orgullo Hispano” (Hispanic Pride), “Orgoglio” (Hispanic—’Great Pride’ (supremacy?)),

No luck with the ACLU either. “White Pride” must not be allowed to exist.

He ends with :The CIR did help by putting my case on the Federalist website, a conservative site where attorneys can take pro bono cases. As of August 2005, I had not received any responses.

Very detailed article. The author really did his homework to craft something that by rights could not be denied. We have no rights then.

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2005/08/feds_rule_white.php

Posted by ben tillman on August 04, 2005, 03:47 PM | #

Well, there’s no money in that kind of case.  And I don’t know what the legal argument would be.  The “equal protection” clause applies to the States not the national government.

Posted by ben tillman on August 04, 2005, 04:04 PM | #

Establishment Clause cases, however, present a straightforward legal argument, even if there are no damages to be won.  Thus, they remaining appealing from my perspective.