I ask you - dear Gentile reader - to fight with me!

Posted by Zach on July 28, 2005, 02:57 PM | #

Great speech Geoff. It has the ring of the Declaration of Independence to it.

Posted by Geoff Beck on July 28, 2005, 06:11 PM | #

Thanks Zach, but it was not just a pep talk, I really did sign up, and will likely go to the border in October.

Look, isn’t this what a citizen of a Republic is supposed to do? I’m not fighting for the Jewish intellectuals, oil interests, or any other dubious goal, I’m fighting for my property and people.

This is the

, not the phoney war.

Posted by Zach on July 28, 2005, 06:45 PM | #

Yes I agree Geoff. It is just common sense really, but so many people seem to be incapable of understanding that being a patriot means backing one’s people, rather than a political/economic unit. Perhaps organizations like the MMP can help raise enough awareness about the destruction of our country taking place that there will be a rebirth of real patriotism.

Posted by sr on July 28, 2005, 08:00 PM | #

Geoff, I have thought the same thing about the BNP. I am sorry you are being stifled. Courage!

Posted by jonjayray on July 28, 2005, 09:05 PM | #

The Minutemen are certainly badly needed.  Congratulations!

Posted by Stuka on July 28, 2005, 11:56 PM | #

Geoff, I sympathise. Have you considered emigration? (BTW I am serious). Just wondering.

Posted by Geoff Beck on July 28, 2005, 11:59 PM | #

Yes.

Posted by Andrew L on July 29, 2005, 01:58 AM | #

Should try migrating to Sudan, hell must be hardly anyone left there, they are all here.

Posted by Guessedworker on July 29, 2005, 02:22 AM | #

Geoff,

I want to add my congratulations on your decision to sign-up for the MMP.  There is a time for words alone, and there is a time for action.  All your recent controbutions here have show that, for you, the latter time has arrived.  I wish you well in October.

One other point: there are also words about action, so maybe MR will get some very interesting coverage from the border.

Posted by seelow heights on July 29, 2005, 04:24 AM | #

Be careful how you fill out the application, the official MMP are fearful of anyone with white racialist tendencies.

Posted by who on July 29, 2005, 08:08 AM | #

Anyone else interested in contributing to a fund to send Geoff to Britain?

Posted by nccrook on July 29, 2005, 09:07 AM | #

Contribute? Hell, I would join him but for the fact that they’ve got too many wogs and white politicians even more spineless than we have here.Any other suggestions, bigshot?

Posted by Geoff Beck on July 29, 2005, 09:58 AM | #

> the official MMP are fearful of anyone with white racialist tendencies.

That is something I’ll keep to myself, like one’s religion. The worst possible thought crime is concern for one’s kin - if one is white.

But, lets be honest, the entire immigration thing is a racial thing. If you are a multiculturalist why oppose immigration?

> emigration

I really don’t know where to go. The entire Western world is being wrecked by immigration and multiculturalism. Perhaps I need to travel to other Western countries to see the comparative damage?

Posted by amon on July 29, 2005, 12:54 PM | #

Geoff:

Are you going to another state to work on the MMP? I heard that heartland states were starting it, althought I don’t know how that’s possible…

Anyhow, if you know you’re going to be sent to the Mexican border, you should wait until late fall or winter. Standing along the Mexican border in 115 degree heat isn’t too much fun…

I really don’t know where to go.

The Faroe Islands are the Whitest place in the world, as far as I know. You’d be the only non-Scandavian there!

Posted by Pericles on July 29, 2005, 12:56 PM | #

The following selections are taken from “Unrestricted Warfare,” a book published in China in February 1999 which proposes tactics for developing countries, in particular China, to compensate for their military inferiority vis-à-vis the United States during a high-tech war. The selections include the table of contents, preface, afterword, and biographical information about the authors printed on the cover. The book was written by two PLA senior colonels from the younger generation of Chinese military officers and was published by the PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House in Beijing, suggesting that its release was endorsed by at least some elements of the PLA leadership. This impression was reinforced by an interview with Qiao and laudatory review of the book carried by the party youth league’s official daily Zhongguo Qingnian Bao on 28 June.

Published prior to the bombing of China’s embassy in Belgrade, the book has recently drawn the attention of both the Chinese and Western press for its advocacy of a multitude of means, both military and particularly non-military, to strike at the United States during times of conflict. Hacking into websites, targeting financial institutions, terrorism, using the media, and conducting urban warfare are among the methods proposed. In the Zhongguo Qingnian Bao interview, Qiao was quoted as stating that “the first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, with nothing forbidden.” Elaborating on this idea, he asserted that strong countries would not use the same approach against weak countries because “strong countries make the rules while rising ones break them and exploit loopholes . . .The United States breaks [UN rules] and makes new ones when these rules don’t suit [its purposes], but it has to observe its own rules or the whole world will not trust it.” (see FBIS translation of the interview, OW2807114599).

http://www.cryptome.org/cuw.htm

This is a long opus, over two hours speed reading. However. it iis worth it!

Pericles

Posted by Pericles on July 29, 2005, 01:03 PM | #

From the John Derbyshire archive at Vdare http://www.vdare.com/derbyshire/050726_london.htm
I clicked on chattering classes and eventually arrived here
http://www.atlanticblog.com/

China

Amid all the talk about John Roberts’ nomination, it would be good to keep an eye on trouble, in this case China. China is fashionable, but it pays to remember that it is an aggressive and imperialist police state. The New York Times has a piece on the Pentagon’s newly released annual report on the state of the Chinese military.

  According to the report, China’s military modernization has included an estimated 650 to 730 mobile, short-range ballistic missiles deployed opposite Taiwan, as well as the acquisition of jet-fighters from Russia. China also has deployed its first two Russian-built guided missile destroyers; two more are under contract for delivery, even as China is increasing the size of its submarine fleet.

  Although those submarines are far less sophisticated than their American counterparts, Pentagon analysts note that increases in the Chinese fleet pose a critical challenge to the Navy: American carriers responding to a crisis could have to operate hundreds of miles farther from Taiwan, reducing the number of fighter sorties they could launch until the Chinese submarines were subdued.

(The full report is here.) I have been startled by the number of Chinese who believe Taiwan may invade China. For the government to maintain that level of propoganda requires a substantial control of information flow. Anne Applebaum offers up a reminder of just how much China is a police state, and the complicity of a number of companies in oppression in China.

  Without question, China’s Internet filtering regime is “the most sophisticated effort of its kind in the world,” in the words of a recent report by Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society. The system involves the censorship of Web logs, search engines, chat rooms and e-mail by “thousands of public and private personnel.” It also involves Microsoft Inc., as Chinese bloggers discovered last month. Since early June, Chinese bloggers who post messages containing a forbidden word—“Dalai Lama,” for example, or “democracy”—receive a warning: “This message contains a banned expression, please delete.” It seems Microsoft has altered the Chinese version of its blog tool, MSN Spaces, at the behest of Chinese government. Bill Gates, so eloquent on the subject of African poverty, is less worried about Chinese free speech.

  But he isn’t alone: Because Yahoo Inc. is one of several companies that have signed a “public pledge on self-discipline,” a Yahoo search in China doesn’t turn up all of the (politically sensitive) results. Cisco Systems Inc., another U.S. company, has also sold hundreds of millions of dollars of equipment to China, including technology that blocks traffic not only to banned Web sites, but even to particular pages within an otherwise accessible site.
  .      .      .

  Over the past couple of years, Harry Wu, a Chinese human rights activist and former political prisoner, has carefully tracked Western corporate cooperation with Chinese police and internal security, and in particular with a Chinese project called “Golden Shield,” a high-tech surveillance system that has been under construction for the past five years. Although the company won’t confirm it, Wu says, Cisco representatives in China have told him that the company has contracts to provide technology to the police departments of at least 31 provinces.

  posted at 07:17 AM | permalink | (0) TrackBack pings | (1) comments

Pericles

Posted by R J Stove on July 30, 2005, 01:53 AM | #

Joseph Sobran, whose work readers of this website will almost certainly know (www.sobran.com/columns), once opined that the perfect solution to the miseries of his existence as a white heterosexual American conservative would be to become the world’s first illegal immigrant in Haiti.

Illegal immigrants, after all, are not a problem Haitians have ever had to cope with; the welfare-hellfare state which does so much to leach white Christian self-respect in the West is nonexistent among the Haitians; and at least in Haiti, Christendom’s enemies would be out in the open, without even the figleaf of legal status which their Western counterparts wear.

As a reductio ad absurdum of Caliban Chic, Haiti may well possess clear advantages to those of us who wonder how we can continue coping in the mire of Western degeneracy.

Posted by AD on July 30, 2005, 06:51 PM | #

I really don’t know where to go.

Tasmania,if you can get work there.

Environmentally stunning;weather is mildish;size roughly similar to Ireland;non-urbanised pop. of 500,000;butt of jokes about inbreeding;white as iceland;english speaking;very low crime rate;a quick plane trip over the sea if you need a multicult/crime fix(Melbourne).

Posted by Geoff Beck on July 30, 2005, 08:31 PM | #

> Faroe Islands, Tasmania

You guys must be crazy, I’m sure as hell not abandoning the ship in such a manner. Hiding out in some ethic enclave, far away, seems like a recipe for genocide to me.

Yes, I’d consider get a “backup passport,” for my kids and myself, but I’m up for the fight, for now.

Posted by AD on July 30, 2005, 09:23 PM | #

You guys must be crazy

Why crazy?Tasmania is part of Australia, a 3 hour trip from here,and it’s where my family roots are.I won’t cease the fight if i go there,its just a good place to raise a family.

I suppose anywhere south of the equator is far away from your perspective,but i only mentioned it because i thought you were seriously looking for suggestions.

Posted by Geoff Beck on July 30, 2005, 10:12 PM | #

Whoops, sorry about that AD. Thanks for setting me straight, no offense meant.

Anyway, I’m convinced that the US is finished, now I just fight because my back is to the wall.

Posted by AD on August 01, 2005, 12:30 AM | #

No offence taken(i just like promoting Tassie to likeminded brothers and sisters around the world).

Posted by Amon on August 01, 2005, 12:56 AM | #

Why do WNs always overlook Poland? It has 39 million people, and is almost completely White. Poles may not be as smart as Western Europeans, but they’re not dumb: IQ and the Wealth of Nations reported the Polish IQ as 99, just one point below the British one. Additionally, another IQ study of European countries’ capitals found Warsaw to have a higher IQ than any capital except Berlin.

And Poland is probably one of Europe’s most conservative countries: it has illegalized abortion. It has a low fertility rate now (1.4ish), but as recently as 1980, its fertility rate was above 2.1.