Death By Democracy

Posted by sr on August 11, 2005, 05:59 PM | #

as if each year the antlers would arise
from the unshed first buds of themselves
and each year more ornate . . .

Posted by James Bowery on August 11, 2005, 06:06 PM | #

Freedom is the right to defend your subsistence assets without a gang coming and taking it from you in the guise of “enforcing the property rights of the landlords”—literally a home free of liablity to anyone be it king, state, landlord or bank.  The clearances of the Scotish lowlands resulting from the feu fees levied on the kindly tenants resulted in the Scotch-Irish flight.  Historically the most valued mercinaries of Europe they were replaced literally by sheep.  Although they played Crown Cop for a bit in Ireland their flight took them ultimately to the New World, American democracy and its original icon, the Jeffersonian Yeoman Farmer.  Now that that the American Clearances, repeating the original assault on freedom, are a fiat accompli, through a variety of manipulations and subterfuges, these people of Scotch-Irish descent have been turned into utterly deracinated zombies who will do anything if someone simply says its for “freedom”.

They still form the nation’s backbone in times of emergency but they’ve been hypnotized by money, media and mendacity to forget what freedom means.  NASCAR has more immediate meaning to them now.

They fight for words they vaguely remember the meaning of from generations past—words now manipulated by the very lords, kings they originally fled.

Posted by Geoff Beck on August 11, 2005, 06:37 PM | #

Spanish Set to Become Official Language of Seven Denver Public Library Branches

Hispanic colonel wants Army entrance exam given in Spanish

Posted by TRI on August 11, 2005, 08:18 PM | #

This is by far the best message to appeal to the scions of the White elite, and those who would become that elite through dint of ability and hard work. Why spend your entire life slaving away to a company only to have everything you work for stripped out from under you???. All you have to do is the math.

It’s a race to see who has:
1) Strong ethnocentrism, and
2) A sufficient majority.

Whether that majority is a a voting majority (e.g. the majority required in the US to pass any amendment you care to name) or the majority capable of waging and winning a guerilla war (e.g. Lebanon), the outcome is the same. Deportation/murder/enslavement of the remnant. In this case, unless something is done THAT REMNANT IS US.

By the time someone has an ethnocentric majority, the game is well and truly over. It’s like having a queen and a rook versus a lone king in a game of chess. By that stage (and far before), the outcome is a foregone conclusion, it’s only a matter of time.

Who will win that coming battle is being decided RIGHT NOW, not 50 years into the future.

Our opponents already have strong ethnocentrism. They are getting their numbers through both immigration, high birthrates, and “affordable family formation”.

This is how it works:
1. Some “moderates” move into a White neighbourhood. They keep to themselves, no one has a problem with them.
2. They bring in friends and relatives of the same ethnicity.
3. Gradually members of the group become more and more obnoxious through legal and then quasi/illegal means. BUT NOT EVERYONE IS A PERPETRATOR. The key is to build the haystack before you hide the needles.
4. This drops housing prices, enabling their relatives/children to move in and further colonize the area.

There are subsidiary strategies, but everything is understandable in the light of the following questions:
“How do I maximize the rate at which I acquire resources compared to competing groups?”
“How do I maximize the rate at which my tribe creates more members compared to competing groups?”

The only question: will we be able to copy, adapt and improve upon their Group Evolutionary Strategy and recruit enough Whites to win the war?

The conditions that will allow Whites to win the war are:
1) Having equal numbers of ethnocentric Whites to the largest strongly ethnocentric other race.
2) Having an ethnocentrism at least as strong as the next largest ethnocentric group. Defined by:
i) No “White Flight” from areas where the two groups are adjacent, and maybe White colonization.
ii) Rate of resource acquisition/influx equal or greater than the next biggest race.
iii) Number of births per year per woman equal or greater to the bext biggest race.

If we can achieve these conditions, we can recruit enough “White liberals” to gain the advantage. Of course, the battle might be decided slightly before this point, but hopefully you understand what I am getting at.

Whether we win the war or not is something that YOU will have to decide.

Forming groups of friends who will adopt the strategy of the enemy is something that EVERYONE can do. And it’s perfectly legal. Remember, after all you ARE a moderate. Let’s not be so hasty to stereotype, shall we?

Let’s hope, vote for but not depend on the Nick Griffins and AHs of the world. The track record of top-down, state enforced solutions is not worth staking the future of your children on.

Posted by Lurker on August 11, 2005, 08:36 PM | #

TRI - Vote for AH, not sure I like the sound of that, who can you mean?

In Northern Ireland we are supposed to sit around until the Catholics outnumber the Protestants and then democracy in all its majesty can disposses our countrymen. Heaven forbid we were to do anything about this demographic process.

Posted by TRI on August 11, 2005, 09:00 PM | #

If you were to take AH’s record in 1938, he would be regarded as the best German leader of all time. He bit off more than he could chew, and as such the writers of the history books and current mythology have made him out to be Satan himself.

Go through your local video store and try to find a positive portrayal of German nationalism. There is always another side to the story, but you won’t find it there. The best you will find is German movies that portray Germans as human but German nationalism as evil, particularly under AH.

Anyway, in Northern Ireland, the solution is to copy, adapt and improve upon the most virulent GES’ of other races. If you want to win that war, you do it by increasing your OWN birthrate, on your own. It is COMPLETELY legal. You need to get out of the “state solution” mindset. It’s a typical White attitude to be a lazy bugger and blame the state for a problem you can solve yourself. Don’t succumb to it.

There are also ways in which you can copy the Muslims in how you limit the birthrate of the opposition. One of which is allow/encourage the men free reign to have sex (but not marry or provide resources to) the females of the other tribe.

The effect of this is to
1) Create a child of divided loyalties, raised in the other tribe.
2) Waste their resources on a child of divided loyalties.
3) Occupy a womb that could be making a member of their tribe.
4) Likely slow/prevent that womb from making more members of that tribe, by giving her “baggage”.

Is this nasty? Yes, but it was not me who drew up the rules of this game, it was mother nature herself.

Posted by TRI on August 11, 2005, 09:15 PM | #

I hasten to add that I do not encourage my Irish cousins to war amongst themselves. If you must compete like this (as you cannot trust your opponent to be friendly), aim to get your ethnocentric majority and then hastily erect a wall.

Good fences make good neighbours, as they say.

Posted by john rackell on August 11, 2005, 09:43 PM | #

Death by Democracy - the epitaph for Norway it seems, from Fjordman:

“Welcome to Eurabia! You know you have entered a strange world when leading politicians from Norway, a country straddling the Arctic Circle and with no colonial history, begin their election campaigns in the Pakistani countryside. I should mention that even our “Conservative” party (Høyre) has been courting the Pakistani vote, but as usual in Europe, the Socialists spare no efforts in their cooperation with Muslims. Leader of the Socialist Left party, Kristin Halvorsen, even praised all the “blood, sweat and tears Pakistanis in Norway have spent on building the country”.

...

“Kristin Halvorsen, the president of the Socialist Left Party SV began her electoral campaign last week with a five-day visit to India and Pakistan. Immigrants make up 3.6% of the Norwegian electorate in the general elections. In Oslo, however, this figure is 12%. For the municipal elections, where everybody who has lived in Norway for three years is entitled to vote, the Oslo figure is 18%. A large part of the Norwegian immigrant population is of Pakistani origin. “

Long article. Needless to say the Pakistanis are bringing the usual blight associated with diversity:

“Vengeful gang beats up wrong target:

As many as 15 Pakistani-Norwegian teenagers attacked a 31-year-old man outside his flat Monday night. They thought he was a journalist who’d written a provocative guide about how to have sex with young Muslim women.”

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/08/norwegian-left-courts-pakistani-vote.html

Posted by Stuka on August 12, 2005, 12:23 AM | #

As many as 15 Pakistani-Norwegian teenagers attacked a 31-year-old man outside his flat Monday night.

15 vs. 1??! Unbelievable. Real brave warriors, these Asian curs. They’re safe in packs, to be sure, but they can be picked off one by one. When are Norwegian men going to fight back?

Posted by Mark Richardson on August 12, 2005, 06:58 AM | #

TRI, Hitler did much worse than overextend himself.

He launched his country into a ruinous war, and he shamed his country with the holocaust.

I don’t mind the “race realist” perspective, but I see Hitler as a kind of modernist aberration to my own culture and tradition.

I also think it’s unwise, and sincerely hope it’s inaccurate, to group together Hitler and Nick Griffin in the way you have.

Posted by Stuka on August 12, 2005, 08:53 AM | #

“He launched his country into a ruinous war ” against fellow Europeans, which surely is the tragedy here. 

Posted by Mark Richardson on August 12, 2005, 09:35 AM | #

Against his fellow Europeans and in alliance with the Japanese - with disastrous consequences for my own country.

Posted by AD on August 12, 2005, 01:03 PM | #

As many as 15 Pakistani-Norwegian teenagers

That term almost makes ‘African-Australian’ look sane by comparison.

Posted by AD on August 12, 2005, 01:21 PM | #

Democracy.How that word makes me want to throw up everytime i hear it uttered as if it were virtuous.

Posted by Stuka on August 12, 2005, 10:06 PM | #

As many as 15 Pakistani-Norwegian teenagers…

That term almost makes ‘African-Australian’ look sane by comparison.

Yes, but isn’t it better than referring to a Subcon settler from Pakistan living in Norway as a “Norwegain” or a kaffir living in Australia as an “Australian”? At least there is an admission here, however implicit, that these non-white savages aren’t fully Norwegian, or Australian, or what have you.

Posted by TRI on August 13, 2005, 12:11 AM | #

Mark,

As far as “leading into a ruinous war” goes, I recall that Hitler managed to reunite the ethnic Germans in Poland, Austria and Czechoslovakia before France and England declared war on Germany. The British also were the first to actually fire on Germans. I believe the British were also the first to fire the first shots at Wilhelmshaven and Brunsbuttel.

You might also recall Judea declaring war on Germany in 3/24/1933, following with a massive international economic boycott. In short, the case for Hitler alone doing any sort of “leading” is a bit one sided to say the least.

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

re:Shaming his country with the holohoax, I’m a little unsure how this was any worse in this regard than the Ukrainian Holocaust, unless you follow the Kosher logic that a Jewish life is worth a hundred Goy lives.

But anyway, I sure hope that there is a difference between Hitler and Griffin. Hopefully Griffin would just expel the non-British, rather than seeking a war of conquest. At that point Britain could start producing some propaganda to counter Hollywood. Necessary, as Britain would by that stage become as “evil” a regime as South Africa. Expect boycotts.

Thank God for nuclear weapons, which prevent first world nations from waging war against each other. In the presence of nuclear weapons and in a globe that is rapidly filling up with people, tribes are now making war on each other at a small scale level.

We either adapt to this warfare and best them, or we perish.