Australia a holdout?

Posted by Andrew L on April 11, 2005, 04:50 AM | #

If Anyone else in Australia, is stupid enough Branks is the king of the State Idiots, Gough’s other Bastard child, now the other, Latham has Gone.A Counter Revolution is healthy and looking stronger, Commander Bolt, Andrew type ,Front and Center.

Posted by John Ray on April 11, 2005, 05:52 AM | #

There is consensus in Oz about selective immigration because people like the results.  I am one of them. The Anglo-Saxon world does not have a monopoly of good citizens.

Posted by JW Holliday on April 11, 2005, 06:32 AM | #

John,

At what point does your European racial particularism kick in?

Posted by Mark Richardson on April 11, 2005, 08:12 AM | #

John,

1) The consensus is between the elites - no-one else has ever been given a say

2) The elites themselves are free to “like the results” as much as they want, since they don’t have to experience the results - they’re mostly insulated from the front line multicultural suburbs.

3) You’ve fallen behind elite opinion in arguing that the Anglo-Saxon world doesn’t have a monopoly of good citizens.

The elites don’t need any convincing of this. They think, in fact, that the good citizens, the ones they have to compete to recruit in order to prosper, are living overseas.

Which helps to explain why there’s a declining effort to train young Australians for the economy. A third of Australia’s doctors are now overseas born. Welders are being flown in from China, whilst Australian companies wind down local apprenticeship schemes. A declining proportion of Australian students are being offered university places - these are increasingly being taken by overseas students.

The elites have given up on the idea that the future of their own country comes from within the country itself.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 11, 2005, 10:10 AM | #

“The Anglo-Saxon world does not have a monopoly of good citizens.”  (—John R.)

Whoever said it did?  But why does the non-A-S world have a monopoly of racially/ethnically more-or-less homogeneous nations?  (Let’s not trot out Malaysia and so on, John—you know exactly what I mean so don’t play games.)

Posted by Andrew L on April 11, 2005, 11:37 AM | #

The bulk of our problem is third world flooding the country, Slave labour Sanctione, is abundant, The other problem was Eastern Block .Large numbers just will not assimulate, they congregate in own ethnic Groups, and there Children are hardend in Parents oirigins.That is Accross the board with all Ethnic make up. Whitlem decided we were going to be Communist, 30 years later we are still repairing the dammage, But it has gone to Far, Labour Party was the Culprit that engaged in the mother of all Branch stack,and political parties have all jumped on the band wagon, just look at the welfare Bill, in eight years , it has increased by 50 billion, ether the Unemployment figures are fraud, or the Imigration are fraud, it compounds in hospitals and ability to cope, some one has deliberatly made us a International Socialist Republic dumping ground.As was the point before,Who asked the public, No one. Anything that is prefixed with Loby in this place is A recipiant of the Soros Foundation.And can any one here remember what Australia was 30 years ago, Yep, starting to resembel an African Nation now,and spiraling out of control, compounding massive problems, and the polititions Just don’t care. There is a battle with reality on the Horizan, that is not racism, it is just fact, we are being systematically made redundant. And If you own a Small buisiness, the tax will tell you we are in state control mode.

Posted by Phil Peterson on April 11, 2005, 04:28 PM | #

The Anglo-Saxon world does not have a monopoly of good citizens.

With friends like these…....

Posted by Mark Richardson on April 12, 2005, 12:54 AM | #

The Herald Sun newspaper, which ran the articles I linked to, also ran a readers’ survey on the issue.

The survey question was “Should Victoria try to lure more migrants?”

1500 readers responded. Forty-seven answered yes. 1453 answered no.

I know it’s not a scientifically conducted survey, but even so it suggests that if there is a “consensus” amongst ordinary Australians, it’s against mass immigration rather than in favour of it.

Posted by Guessedworker on April 12, 2005, 04:17 PM | #

Are the 47 liberals or immigrants?

Posted by Mark Richardson on April 12, 2005, 05:50 PM | #

Immigration lawyers.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 12, 2005, 08:53 PM | #

... with perhaps a few Bush-family distant cousins thrown in? ...