Plod cops it again from the anti-whitist establishment

Posted by Geoff Beck on March 08, 2005, 02:14 PM | #

I remember watching a British WWII documentary film about pilots that were trained to bomb German dams.

The mission commenced when the commander uttered the word “nigger”. If I’m not mistaken the entire mission was named “Operation Nigger”.

It seems the commander of the mission had a black labrador dog whose name was “nigger”. I was shocked to discover that the word was broadcast in the documentary film created sometime in the ‘90s, I guess.

Posted by Effra on March 08, 2005, 03:18 PM | #

Geoff: TV has recently transmitted prints of the film (‘The Dam Busters’, 1956) with the appalling word bleeped out.

Posted by ben tillman on March 08, 2005, 03:35 PM | #

Well, you can always watch “The Wall”, in which the “offending scene” is watched by the protagaonist.

Posted by ben tillman on March 08, 2005, 03:39 PM | #

Wow—these bureaucrats absolutely butcher the English language!

Posted by Phil Peterson on March 08, 2005, 04:35 PM | #

“It seems the commander of the mission had a black labrador dog whose name was “nigger”.”

It would be an interesting question to ask: would the brave RAF pilots who spilt their blood and flew their planes into the range of the brutally precise Luftwaffe have done so if they could see a snapshot of “free” Britain in the year 2005?

Posted by Guessedworker on March 08, 2005, 05:03 PM | #

Phil,

As the son of an RAF Lancaster pilot I can tell you that they would not have been able to conceive the possibility of what has been done to their beloved land and motherland.  No politician or public intellectual would have been able to propose it.  When a handful of blacks arrived in the years between 1948 and 1954 the English were told that these alien people would not be staying.  This whole situation has arisen through the employment of official deception and censorship.

Posted by john rackell on March 08, 2005, 06:11 PM | #

Who knows what the ultimate motivations of the pilots were? For sure they were animated by devotion and love of country, some anyway, but even in the RAF the country may not have been Britain. Poles, Canadian, Americans all flew in Fighter Command and Bomber command. In fact the Israeli air force was formed from fighter pilots who’d served in the wartime RAF and then turned around to kill Britons in Palestine.

People have many different motivations to serve. Why did they risk their lives to drop bombs on Germans. Because they were told to do so and they did it.

Why were the police officers who busted up Nick Griffins house just before Christmas acting for the forces of a fascist regime. Are they doing it out of patriotism, honor or just because they were told to do it. All the honor and patriotism belongs to Nick Griffin et al. who are resisting the assault on liberty and democracy peacefully.

The police are quite decent individually but they have no individual conscience other than to serve their masters.

So you ask what would the men of the RAF have thought of the changes. I’d say they would have been happy enforcing the regimes policies using any strong arm tactics without it disturbing their consciences.

Posted by Guessedworker on March 08, 2005, 07:36 PM | #

Actually, John, I’m not sure there is a meaningful or direct comparison to be made between the modern police force and Bomber Command aircrew.

The latter were extremely high quality volunteers.  A third were made officers anyway.  But had they gone instead into the Army, many more would have been commissioned.

Almost to a man they had joined up with the intention of flying single-seaters in Fighter Command.  The Battle of Britain was the greatest recruiting campaign of all time.  All but the most natural flyers, however, found themselves on a conveyor elsewhere - mostly to Bomber Command, a fate they would have earnestly hoped to avoid.

Thereafter, duty and discipline certainly took over and there was zero consideration, as there had to be, of events under the bombs they dropped.  But to compare these people, fighting for the survival of their country in wartime, with the ill-educated, career-minded modern police constable is a covering an awful lot of ground in one leap.  Not sure it’s really useful to try.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 08, 2005, 07:52 PM | #

“Why were the police officers who busted up Nick Griffin’s house just before Christmas acting for the forces of a fascist regime? Are they doing it out of patriotism, honor or just because they were told to do it? All the honor and patriotism belongs to Nick Griffin et al. who are resisting the assault on liberty and democracy peacefully.”  (—John Rackell)

That utterly unjustifiable and unspeakable dawn raid on Griffin’s home, and his retention under arrest some twelve hours for interrogation, was a David Blunkett operation, was it not?

Blunkett’s name and acts are, I trust, burned into everyone’s memories ...

Posted by Geoff Beck on March 08, 2005, 07:57 PM | #

Ok… let throw in something else… and I admit I may be stepping in manure: Blunkett is both a Scot and a Homo? Right?

Or wait, who is the guy that sits next to Blair in “PM’s Question Time”, he’s a homo, too?

Sounds to me like the gay mafia at work.

Posted by john rackell on March 08, 2005, 08:34 PM | #

Well Sir David Calvert-Smith, as head of Public Prosecutions is no mean sort of bloke himself in terms of education and professional achievement. He just happened to be the top policeman.

As director of CPS he got to instigate prosecutions under the Race Acts of any dissenter of multiculturalism. It’s one thing for a dissenter to take on a bunch on nitwit liberal academics it’s another thing to take on the entire wait of the British judicial/police system. He is the real power behind the multicultural managerial state.

I’m interested in his motivations and others like him. Is he just a career minded ideologue or does he act out of a sense of service? And how can Bliar’s regime rely on the unquestioning loyalty of everyone from head of CPS to PC Plod who actually does the billy clubbing, to carry out the dismantling of Britain.

I think there are many decent people who because duty and discipline to their country are working against the best interests of their own country. They act in a similar fashion to the firebombers of Dresden who must have felt some pangs of conscience but did it anyway.

Posted by Lurker on March 08, 2005, 10:45 PM | #

GW - At the risk of sounding like a wet liberal if it had only been a handful every year it would not have been a problem esp with selection for education & training etc. We could have lived with that.

Posted by - on March 09, 2005, 11:04 AM | #

...if it had only been a handful every year…

In practice the handful are not inert and, especially selected for intelligence, will have an influence on future policies. Democratic systems will tend to suffer from positive feedback.