Human protandry:  showing that sex roles are not “socially constructed”

A natural experiment which shows that being bought up female does NOTHING towards making a male adult feminine.  Two articles on the subject are reproduced below:

Startling sex-changes on the island where little sister may become big brother

By SANDRA JOBS0N,  in London

On a lush tropical island in a remote area of the Caribbean something, very peculiar is happening. The young girls in one village are turning into boys.  This startling sex change is occurring naturally, and a team of scientists sent to the island believes it could throw a new light on fundamental aspects of human nature and sexual identification.  It has all been revealed in a fascinating documentary shown recently on BBC television, called The Fight to be Male.

The Caribbean phenomenon has been happening for the past 50 years. In that time 37 village girls have changed into boys around the age of 13. The cause has been traced back to one woman seven generations ago who passed on genetic abnormality to her descendants.

The story of the Batista family is typical of the village. Four out of the ten children in the Batista family have changed from girls into boys.  The eldest, Mario, now 29 and married with children, began life as a girl named Antonia.  The next daughter Milady. remains a girl.  Then came Chichi, now 19, a normal male who started out as a girl called Isobel.  Then there is Venecia, a normal girl.  And now Virgilio, who is 12 and in the process of changing from a female to a male.

The Batistas do not regard themselves or their affected children as freaks. After all, 22 other families have experienced the same sex transformation over the years.  The primitive lifestyle of the village contributes greatly to the relaxed and passive acceptance of “God’s will.” The people of the island are a mixture of Negroid and Creole stock - well-built handsome men and tall, strapping girls able to share the work load of cutting sugar cane, the island’s staple crop.

The Caribbean climate makes life both easy and lazy. So some of the girls turn into boys? Who cares? As long as they are happy.  Virgilio’s brothers immediately found girlfriends when they turned into boys. Mario, the eldest, is the father of two children now, living in one of the bigger towns.

“We always brought up our girls as girls” Mr Batista says. “Because that’s what we always thought they were.”

“And some of our girls stayed girls,” adds Mrs Batista, pointing to two of her grown-up daughters who remained girls and are now married with babies of their own. None of the Batista men who were girls appears to show any sign of embarrassment about the change. Even Virgilio, still in the process, did not mind removing his trousers to reveal his sexual parts.

At birth Virgilio and his other sisters who became boys looked just like any other female baby.  But the male anatomy was waiting inside his body and the external genitalia began to change at puberty.  The testes dropped, as with all pubescent boys. But in the Caribbean children, the testes have to force their way from deep inside the child’s body.  The clitoris grew into a normal, full-size male penis.

In Virgilio’s case the process is still half-way and his external sexual organs appear curiously bisexual at present.  But soon his tiny, infantile vagina will close up and he will be completely male.  I am looking forward very much to being a man” she says through an interpreter. “I have a girlfriend already”.

The phenomenon was first observed by a Spanish doctor who visited the village on holiday soon after it was connected by road to the rest of the island back in 1950.  He wrote up his discovery in a Spanish medical journal where it remained unnoticed until 1972 when a team of doctors _came cross the article and decided to investigate more closely.

To protect the families the team will not reveal the name of the village or the island, but a BBC producer, Edward Galdwyn, was allowed to film the children recently.  The team, headed by Dr Julienne Imperator-McGinley has pieced together a family tree of all the 23 affected families, tracing them back seven generations to one woman named Altagracia who married four times and produced a large number of children.

All of them carried a mutant gene which shows up only when one of the members of the 23 families marries a cousin.  The clue to it all is a chemical called dihydrotestosterone which Virgilio and the other affected children were unable to produce when they were tiny babies.  Doctors can now reliably state that it is the chemical which creates the external anatomy of the male.

In the womb all babies have the beginnings of both male and female sex organs.  How the child develops, is determined by the “program” laid down by the chromosomes within its cells.  If the child has the female chromosome structure, she will develop ovaries, and the male organs will disintegrate, leaving the female organs to grow.

But the Caribbean children had inherited a faulty gene which meant that the testes developed, but failed to produce the chemical which would remove the female parts.  The body did not start producing the vital chemical until puberty, and then the children underwent the changes that should have occurred in the womb.

What is particularly significant is that all of the Caribbean children were brought up as normal girls.  They were taught the ordinary female village tasks: Washing the clothes, cooking, fetching the wood, and they played with dolls.

But when they reached the age of l0 they suddenly felt the urge to be male. Young Virgilio explains: “I began to feel like a man in my muscles.”  Virgilio’s father explains: “When they turn into men they change into different clothes. Soon everybody forgets. They find girlfriends very quickly.”  Indeed, the affected children become more muscular and virile than their normal brothers.

The easy adjustment of the Caribbean children led the scientists to challenge the usual view that our “male” or “female” behaviour is determined more by the way we are brought up than by our physiology.  They suggest that there may be a part of the brain which is different in males and females and which governs much of what we think of as sex-role behaviour.

(From the Sydney “SUN-HERALD” JUNE 17 1979, p. 41)

Another version of the same story:

“In the south-west corner of a tropical Caribbean island live Belarmino and Benilda Batista and their family of ten children. Four of them were born as girls, grew up as girls but, at puberty changed into muscular men. Their eldest child, Mario, now aged 29 began as a girl called Antonia. Chichi, now a male 19-year old, began as a girl called Isobel. All ‘changing’ children were born with normal female genitalia and grew to have the normal female body shape; until at the age of twelve their vaginas healed over, two testicles descended and they grew full-sized penises. Their ten-year old, Virgilio, is in the process of changing from a female to a male.

After their change, the boys are on average more muscular than their normal brothers. They take on the tough jobs in the local quarry. They marry and lead a normal male sexual life - even though they have not been fertile.

The Batistas are just one of 23 affected families in their village, in which 37 children have changed. In the society of the village - a deeply religious Catholic community - these children’s change has been seen as part of God’s mysterious ways. They are accepted and allowed to be themselves in a way which couldn’t happen in Western society.

In conversation with Dr Gautier, director of the children’s hospital on the island, the parents were quite clear about their feelings towards the children. They spoke of their pride in their new sons, of the extra money the children would bring home as boys rather than girls; and they insisted that the children’s adjustment to their new gender roles was immediate. Benilda admitted having feelings of sadness and worry; but, supported by a devout community, she came to see the phenomenon as God’s will: “If WE made children with our own hands we would make them perfect, beautiful and complete. But God knows what he is doing.”

Although girls had been changing into boys since 1930, it was not known outside the district until the first doctor went on holiday there. He published his findings about the children in an obscure Spanish journal, where it lay unnoticed until 1972. Dr Gautier’s attention was originally drawn by a patient who had been in his hospital when about eight years old, and whose behaviour had then seemed completely female. And some time later he met that person working in the mountains cutting wood, and his behaviour was as a male. Dr Gautier was so surprised that he and a group of scientists began investigating the change and how it came about.

When scientists put all the family pedigrees together, they began to see the interrelationship between one family and the next. They ended up with an enormous family tree, showing 23 families going back seven generations to one woman - Altagracia Carrasco. She lived in the mid nineteenth century, and she is the commonest ancestor of the affected families. The mutant gene has been passed down from her - but shows only when both parents carry it. How these children develop in the womb has been worked out by the scientists, and it gives a new twist to the story of how male genitals form.

The egg is fertilised by a Y sperm and it first develops to a foetus with normal testes. Perfectly normally, they absorb the female parts, and testosterone preserves the male ducts. But in these children’s cases, it doesn’t change the external anatomy, because in their bodies the children miss a critical chemical step.

Normal men are able to process cholesterol through to testosterone - and on to a mysterious hormone called dihydrotestosterone. No-one knew what its function was. But because the Caribbean children cannot make it, and because injecting it into them stimulates their genital growth, it is clear now that dihydrotestosterone creates the male external anatomy. The pubertal surge of testosterone in these children forces up the dihydrotestosterone level and growth that should have happened ten years before, in the mother’s womb, takes place at last.

(From The Fight To Be Male from Horizon, At The Frontiers Of Medicine, Ariel Books, BBC 1983.  Reproduced here)

Posted by jonjayray on Saturday, April 23, 2005 at 02:01 AM in No particular place to go
Comments (25) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by GayLikeAFox on April 23, 2005, 03:53 AM | #

Does anyone really believe that gender is just a “social construction” anymore?  I thought that theory went out of style in the 90’s.

Also, what was the case about that boy who was castrated as an infant due to a botches circumcision, raised as a girl (a miserable girl), finally turned back to a male and committed suicide?  So very sad.

2

Posted by Guessedworker on April 23, 2005, 06:54 AM | #

GLAF,

Check out the ctheory site:-

http://www.ctheory.net/

You’ll find quite a lot of stuff about the borderlands of identity.  This is a site devoted to cultural marxism.  It is not a genetic- or biology-focussed site.  I don’t know who the site owners, Mr & Mrs Kroker, are or what their own genetic interest is.  But they are not alone in trying to position marxist ideology for an assault on masculinity via a putative third-wave feminism and, particularly, transsexualism.

3

Posted by Matt Nuenke on April 23, 2005, 09:44 AM | #

Joan Roughgarden, a transsexual evolutionary researcher that was born a male and was operated on to become a male, published the 2004 book “Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People.” The book is very well written, and looks at nature for variations on sexuality. Roughgarden tries to make the case that since nature is comfortable with variations in sexual expression, humans should also accept these variant types.

Not wanting to enter the “what is natural debate,” I was struck by her political agenda to find approval for sexual variants because they exist. Yet, when a person expresses racial solidarity it is automatically a bad thing, something to be fought against. So here we have two people: one a race realist and a race separatist and the other a transsexual. One is encouraged to write and lobby for tolerance, but the other is shunned as a racist. Yet, both are driven by equally genetic coding in my humble opinion. If it is acceptable to treat one’s family with preference, why not one’s race as Salter has pointed out? My point is, we can use gender variants as examples of variations in attitude towards race. There is no correct position as far as nature is concerned—only what works.

4

Posted by GayLikeAFox on April 23, 2005, 03:38 PM | #

Matt,

Excellent point.  I have always felt that my “gay pride” and my “white pride” were two sides of the same coin (though try saying that to most gays OR white nationalists!)  When I study history and recognize the disproportionate contributions gays have made to western culture, my heart swells with a pride that can never be fully eclipsed by the knowledge that gays, in the last 30 years, have behaved disgracefully in regards to AIDS and engaged in unwarranted attacks on the normalcy of the traditional family (which is good for all children, regardless of their sexual predisposition). Similarly, when I look at the amazing accomplishments of white people throughout history, I am simply awestruck and proud, so very proud, of my people.  Yes, I recognize that whites can and have behaved disgracefully.  I do not deny or apologize for the Holocaust or our genocide against Native Americans.  But even on that issue, I recognize that the very standards we use to condemn such actions (which take the form of a codified system of human rights) were invented by white people.  In other words, whites did not invent genocide or slavery or any of that, but we did invent the belief system that has the best chance (still a pretty small one, unfortunately) of doing away with such abuses forever. 

Strange, isn’t it, that I am permitted to be proud of being gay but not of being white, when one is really no more rational or harmless than the other!  It’s so bizarre when you think about it there really isn’t anything more to say.

5

Posted by Andrew L on April 23, 2005, 06:36 PM | #

Heavens above , sound like a Vote Factory, Chern them out when needed, I often wondered how our ansestors coped with mother natures hashness in days gone by, It is made out as if it is just a prepersition of recent time, that these problems exist, or had not existed before,Egyption Akaunaten was seemingly of this biological state, But I dont think Surgeons were capable of re Transplanting any thing then, so what is the Question, it is not a recent condition. But they did not have democracy and Leftism then, they would just terminate any such thought on the spot. Sounds Good, probably not many white anglo"s around to point the finger at.It’s our falt, we did it , Pay up. Yep thats the driving force, Guilt and Ill begotten wealth at others expence,that has to ring a bell in someones head.

6

Posted by ya mum on November 24, 2006, 08:47 AM | #

i am one of these children and im a randy bugga

7

Posted by kitten on January 24, 2009, 12:07 PM | #

How long does this process of the girls turning into boys take? We are studying this is psychology and it would be interesting to know.

8

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 01:02 PM | #

“How long does this process of the girls turning into boys take? We are studying this in psychology and it would be interesting to know.”  (—kitten)

 

The process will continue until demographic attrition gets the Jewish population numbers in this country down to below about a million or so.  Then things will get back to normal, and girls will stop trying to turn into boys.  (Better not phrase it that way to your psych prof, Kitten, or you’ll get an F.  Better find something out of Susan Faludi, Katy Roiphe, Erica Jong, Naomi Wolfe, someone like that, to copy from — in a pinch, any female “thinker” with a Jewish name’ll do, hun.  Hey don’t mention it, always glad to help out.)

9

Posted by Laura on February 10, 2010, 03:02 PM | #

“...Gays, in the last 30 years, have… engaged in unwarranted attacks on the normalcy of the traditional family (which is good for all children, regardless of their sexual predisposition).”

I’m sorry, GayLikeAFox, but if I’m following that your idea of an “unwarranted attack” is the desire of gay people to have a family, I’m not sure that’s a fair statement to make.  Having come from a family of divorce, alcoholism and domestic abuse with heterosexual parentage, I think that it’s far more important for children to grow up in a safe home filled with love, support and consistency, rather than nitpicking over gender.  Surely if you don’t believe in social constructionism (which I’m fairly sure can’t all be old news because environment and stereotyping inevitably plays a role in development) you can’t believe that the existence of a biologically female or male role-model is the be all and end all of the stability of the family unit.  Yes, it would be good if we could all have our picket fences with a nuclear family unit if that included appropriate treatment, but in the grand scheme of things it’s better to be reared by a gay or single parents than abusive ones.  I’d certainly choose that any day.

Also, with regards again with your assertion that social constructionism went “out of style” in the 1990s, this study likely contributed to that end, having been performed by Imperato-McGinley in 1974.

Finally, I can’t recall the year, but the study to which you are referring, with the circumcision botch, was a study by Dr Money.

10

Posted by just saying on October 16, 2010, 12:00 PM | #

There is a difference between gender and sex. Read.

11

Posted by Graham on November 29, 2011, 12:49 PM | #

I propose that sociologically acceptable pride is attached to belonging to a group that has achieved something amazing in the face of immense opposition, and in most cases, ONGOING discrimination.

On it’s own, speaking from a common societal perception standpoint, the Caucasian nature of one’s skin is not directly associated with any ongoing discrimination, nor with having overcome anything that warrants pride.

In other words, in the eyes of society, being white today doesn’t automatically come with any potential on-going opposition or discrimination that gives you permission to take pride in what other white people have achieved or overcome in the past…

One could hypothesize that social acceptance/recognition of group-based pride can be directly correlated to society’s readiness to recognize (some might go so far as to say “apologize”) for past offenses against those that have faced and overcome unwarranted persecution.

Prime examples are the socially accepted heritage-based pride among Native Americans, African Americans, even Irish or Italian Americans…hell even plain old Americans overcame the oppression of British rule, hence patriotism.

So to answer the question - Caucasian Americans have never been on the receiving end of discrimination at the same levels that homosexuals have, nor do they continue to have to fight for their equality.

Finally, those that have acted under the banner of white pride in the past are more easily associated with wrongdoing and hatred of other groups than good.

Hence Gay pride is ok, and White pride is racist.

12

Posted by Quick Question on November 29, 2011, 06:46 PM | #

I was just curious if there was anywhere online to view this documentary? I checked BBC but came up with no results.
Thanks.

13

Posted by Joy on December 04, 2011, 06:54 PM | #

Graham,
This is an incredibly well thought out and perfectly stated comment. You have embodied a truth here that I have never been eloquent enough to verbalize. Thank you.

14

Posted by Aly on December 04, 2011, 08:03 PM | #

The process will continue until demographic attrition gets the Jewish population numbers in this country down to below about a million or so.  Then things will get back to normal, and girls will stop trying to turn into boys.

What the hell does the amount of Jews have anything to do with this?

15

Posted by Emily on December 07, 2011, 08:59 AM | #

I claim hoax. It doesn’t make sense to me biologically. There’s also a major inconsistency: one article says they have children, one claims they’re infertile. There’s also the fact that the article doesn’t link to the BBC source that it claims exists, nor give the name of the scientist who discovered this. It’s a lie, pure an simple.

16

Posted by Skeptic on January 03, 2012, 10:20 AM | #

I agree with Emily; where are the sources? Where are the facts? Why can’t I find any other information about this? I’m not saying that it is a flat out lie, but for such a phenomenon to be discussed, surely peer reviewed sources need to be cited and referenced in order to add validity to the subject! Now I understand that protandrous dichogamous psuedohermaphroditism does occur where protogynous cases are far more frequent, but to say that 4 in 10 girls turn into boys when they reach pubity, is absurd without offering supporting evidence! that is all I would like to say on the matter!

17

Posted by FVC on January 19, 2012, 09:41 AM | #

@ Emily and Skeptic

It’s real, you might want to have a look at The Batista Family study (Imperato-McGinley et al., 1974).

The reason why the anomaly is so common in this island is because most of the families in the island are related and possess a similar gene-pool. Since the the defective gene seems to be recessive, both parents must be heterozygous dominant and therefore have around 25% probability of their child expressing this anomalous trait.

18

Posted by ven on March 05, 2012, 12:06 AM | #

I saw this documentary in Jamaica in the early 1990’s and have always wondered what the current status was. But I dont think it was in the caribbean, but somewhere else

19

Posted by Gabriel on April 11, 2012, 11:25 PM | #

The title is a non sequitur. “Sex roles” are roles society expects of one for the configuration of their genitals or for their perceived configuration of genitals. The people on this island are still taking on sex roles (we see evidence by the change of names as the bodies are changing.)

Sex can be described as a social construct is because of the idea that there are only 2 sexes (Primary sex characteristics, hormones, chromosomes, and secondary sex characteristics). However, there are a minimum of 120 human sexes when looking at the minimum number of combinations of these people are born with.

If we are talking about gender, as in behavior (for euro-centered genders those behaviors are generally categorized into masculine and/or feminine expression. I say generally because there are various sub and counter cultures in which members do not fit into a masculine/feminine categorization. Of course, not all cultures are euro-centered and neither are their genders broken up into categories of masculine and feminine behaviors.)

20

Posted by RetBranche on August 08, 2013, 12:38 AM | #

“The Batistas do not regard themselves or their affected children as freaks. After all, 22 other families have experienced the same sex transformation over the years. “

So it’s quite normal in that place then? Do expert consider this as a sickness?

21

Posted by SallieMae on October 17, 2013, 04:42 AM | #

What a bunch of horeshit- HUMAN PROTANDRY.  These were not XY females who turned into XX men- they were XX males from birth- with an intersex condition called 5-alphareductase deficiency.  They are deficient in that enzyme which convert testosterone to DHT.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guevedoche

THEY DID NOT TURN INTO MEN- THEY WERE MEN SINCE BIRTH WITH AN INTERSEX CONDITION.

I wish the sick fucking trannies would just stop trying to exploit people with actual intersex conditions.  THE INTERSEX ARE NOT LIKE YOU- A BUNCH OF SICK FUCKING DUDES GETTING HARD_ONS IN YOUR CUTE PINK PANTIES.  SICK FREAKS.

22

Posted by Valour on June 12, 2014, 05:40 AM | #

The reason why the anomaly is so common in this island is because most of the families in the island are related and possess a similar gene-pool. Since the the defective gene seems to be recessive, both parents must be heterozygous dominant and therefore have around 25% probability of their child expressing this anomalous trait.

Actually 1/25 indicates it is autosomal recessive.

23

Posted by ForSkeptics on June 14, 2014, 03:12 AM | #

Here’s an abstract to dr Imperato-McGinley’s research:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412121

24

Posted by . on September 28, 2014, 04:50 PM | #

Are you sure they really liked dressing or doing what their gender was supposed to or they did it to conform. Or maybe just like many other kids their interest changed as they got older.

25

Posted by DanielS on September 28, 2014, 10:41 PM | #

If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody there to hear it, does it make a noise?

At first it seems obvious that the answer is yes; but when one considers the “no” answer, one finds provocative implications - that it may as well not make a noise as far as we are concerned, if there were never any people there to hear it and determine how it counts.

Thus, whether or not gender is socially constructed is a philosophical question; and treating it as a social construction is correctly meant to undo the Cartesian separation and its destructive consequences.

Social constructionism has been distorted, perverted really, by Jewish academics, to a Cartesianism in the other direction - that is to say that you can virtually make anything out of events that you fancy and imagine. That is not social constructionism proper, which, being non-Cartesian, must respect facts but engage them in an ongoing hermeneutic process of interactive feedback between fact, individual and how these count for other people.

As Jews manipulate how these facts count for other people, we may be tempted to fixate on mere “facts”, become scientistic and Cartesian in our individual assertion, attempting pure separation from the verification of others.

Nevertheless, you can tell if you are being subject to the false, Jewish “social constructionism”, if you have to enter the word “mere” before the term social constructionism in order to make sense of their assertion that some event or entity is a mere imaginative creation. However, in that “mere” is the Cartesian divide that renders it not social constructionism at all.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Next entry: How could he do it?

Previous entry: How Governments are Overthrown

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

The Talent commented in entry 'MR Radio: Migchels, Bowery Address Malign Economics' on 11/22/14, 06:19 AM. (go) (view)

FrostyDemography commented in entry 'Apollo&Dionysus: Were Hippies Protesting the Moon Landing, Ayn?' on 11/22/14, 04:31 AM. (go) (view)

Deal commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/22/14, 04:15 AM. (go) (view)

CompulsoryDiversityNews commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 11/22/14, 03:38 AM. (go) (view)

ImperialCulture commented in entry 'Paying attention to the place of community as well.' on 11/22/14, 01:49 AM. (go) (view)

voznich commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/22/14, 01:31 AM. (go) (view)

ImmigrationFiat commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/22/14, 12:23 AM. (go) (view)

AustraliaCalling commented in entry 'Pay attention' on 11/21/14, 12:26 PM. (go) (view)

That'sHow commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/21/14, 10:35 AM. (go) (view)

Eikos commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/21/14, 09:54 AM. (go) (view)

Don'tSteal commented in entry 'Letter To Brezhnev' on 11/21/14, 04:36 AM. (go) (view)

Obamnesty commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/21/14, 04:28 AM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 08:58 PM. (go) (view)

Mark2 commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 03:55 PM. (go) (view)

teamwork commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 12:58 PM. (go) (view)

Eikos commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 11:40 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 04:22 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 01:11 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/19/14, 01:40 PM. (go) (view)

voznich commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/19/14, 05:47 AM. (go) (view)

CDN commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/18/14, 04:29 PM. (go) (view)

Hermes commented in entry 'A hermeneuticist confronts a sortocracer with a provocative issue' on 11/18/14, 12:15 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 12:53 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 09:01 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 07:25 AM. (go) (view)

KyleC*nt commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 01:28 AM. (go) (view)

Chris commented in entry 'Are we to be cannon fodder for war on behalf of White plutocrats?' on 11/16/14, 05:01 PM. (go) (view)

Same Old Feelin' commented in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/16/14, 12:42 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/14/14, 07:18 PM. (go) (view)

TheCosbyShow commented in entry 'From baroque to rock - Part 1' on 11/14/14, 05:10 PM. (go) (view)

NoWhiteFlight commented in entry 'Jan The White Uniter' on 11/14/14, 04:53 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/13/14, 07:38 PM. (go) (view)

W.T. Wojejgłowiewicz commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/13/14, 07:01 PM. (go) (view)

artur-b-chmielewski commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/13/14, 06:28 PM. (go) (view)

goybelchiński commented in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/13/14, 06:12 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Anti-White Media

Audio/Video

Controlled Opposition

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa

affection-tone