Island of Honey

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malta

The Maltese islands were first settled in 5200 BC by stone age farmers who had arrived from the larger island of Sicily, possibly the Sicani. The extinction of the dwarf hippos and dwarf elephants has been linked to the earliest arrival of humans on Malta…The population on Malta grew cereals, raised domestic livestock and, in common with other ancient Mediterranean cultures, worshiped a fertility figure represented in Maltese prehistoric artifacts as exhibiting the large proportions seen in similar statuettes, including the Venus of Willendorf…Phytogeographically, Malta belongs to the Liguro-Tyrrhenian province of the Mediterranean Region within the Boreal Kingdom…

Posted by Søren Renner on Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 09:27 AM in
Comments (60) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by q on June 04, 2009, 10:24 AM | #

That political ad is fabulous. It captures the nationalist sentiment beautifully.

2

Posted by VNN pride on June 04, 2009, 11:39 AM | #

Semitic vermin.

3

Posted by VNN pride on June 04, 2009, 12:04 PM | #

The Maltese people are kindred of the Jews. Semites. Expel them from Europe. They don’t believe here any more than Turkey or Israel.

4

Posted by Guessedworker on June 04, 2009, 12:13 PM | #

Are you really prideful, or are you so bereft of that essential quality you are currently working for the Feds?  Anyway, look around you and take note of the standard of commentary usual here, and sin no more.

As for the video, it’s nice but Norman will have his work cut out.  Here’s the Wikipedia page on Saturday’s vote in Malta:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament_election,_2009_(Malta)

5

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 04, 2009, 12:19 PM | #

If any Maltese people stop in to view this log entry’s video, please post a comment saying what your impression is of the issues at stake in this election, and your impression of what Norman Lowell stands for.

To “VNN Pride,” save that intra-European ethnoracial rivalry for the day, not too long off we hope, when Europe will be re-established politically along Lowell-type regionalism lines.  On that day you, as, I presume, a northern European, can call the Maltese (who are an integral part of Europe in no way analagous to Turks) all the racial epithets you want and they can do likewise to you (in fact, it’s healthy for you both to do so, and unhealthy for men to be completely devoid of the “us-them” instinct), as long as the overall peace of the continent is not disturbed.  You’ll be free to not let them migrate to your region and they to not let you migrate to theirs.  Etc., etc., etc.

6

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 04, 2009, 12:23 PM | #

“are you so bereft of that essential quality you are currently working for the Feds?”  (—GW)

My immediate reaction on reading his comments was to wonder the same thing.

7

Posted by Guessedworker on June 04, 2009, 12:26 PM | #

The country perhaps most likely to produce a serious advance for a non-Establishment party is the Netherlands.  Geert Wilders, however, is not the full nationalist shilling.

In the Netherlands, popular anger is expected to benefit the right-wing Freedom Party, led by Geert Wilders who created international controversy over his short film that criticises the Quran as a “fascist book”.

Wilders has won support from Protestant and Catholic voters disenchanted with what’s perceived as the growing influence of the nation’s 800,000 Muslims, many of them immigrants.

Dutch voters are also upset at the ruling coalition of the Christian Democrats and the Labor Party, which are seen as unable to offer rapid solutions to unemployment and bank insolvencies brought about by the global economic crisis.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/06/20096491821125990.html

8

Posted by Nobody Worth Responding To on June 04, 2009, 11:03 PM | #

VNN Pride,
The next time you troll/sockpuppet Majority Rights, please try harder.  That was terrible.  Morris Dees is going to be let down.  And I hope you aren’t working for the Feds.  Otherwise that’s my tax dollars at work and I’m getting ripped off!  But then again, maybe that’s close enough for gov’t work.  Perhaps you are an Affirmative Action hire?

9

Posted by VNN pride on June 06, 2009, 12:21 PM | #

So you guys approve of Semites infiltrating Europe? If you accept the Semitic Maltese, where do you draw the line? At Jews? At Arabs? At Persians? At Turks? At East Indians? These are Semites too, of foreign race, and (except for the Arabs, who are our allies against the Jew) they are enemies of the West.

10

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 06, 2009, 01:03 PM | #

“If you accept the Semitic Maltese, where do you draw the line?”  (—VNN Pride)

I draw the line around Europe.  Does Malta historically lie within?  Assuredly.  (Ask the Turks, incidentally, whose defeat at Lepanto was secured with the help of three warships sent by Malta:  thanks in part to tiny Malta in 1571 you “bigger, braver, whiter” northerners didn’t get completely overrun by the Turks.  Your ass was saved by Malta when no one in the north of Europe was interested in lifing a finger to save themselves and Don Juan had to essentially go it alone together with a few Mediterranean powers!)  I don’t know what their genetics are.  I don’t care.  “Semitic”?  You mean they’re part Carthaginian, is that it?  So are the Sicilans.  So what?  They’re plenty European enough for me.

My advice to VNN Pride:  have a cup of STFU.

11

Posted by VNN pride on June 06, 2009, 01:57 PM | #

The Maltese is not different from the Jew. Semites out of Europe. Period. There is no room for debate on such an obvious point. If you disagree you are either a fool or a traitor of the white race disguised as a proponent of white nationalist—or at worst, an agent proveceteur.

End Semitic hegemony NOW.

TURKEY OUR OF EUROPE.

MALTA OUT OF EUROPE

ISRAEL (read: Jews) OUT OF EUROPE

NO NEGATION

REPATRIATION!

12

Posted by Guessedworker on June 06, 2009, 04:22 PM | #

You’re right, prideful.  We’re all semites and traitors, and we can’t leave those maltesers alone.  Now, don’t you think it would be better if you took your ground-breaking rationale to the mother continent and cleared away all these crypto-semites yourself.  You should be able to talk pretty big on Cominotto.

13

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 06, 2009, 04:41 PM | #

I would strongly suspect VNN Pride is in fact someone on the other side trying to foment discord here based on his idiotic caricature-notion, a caricature typical of the other side’s moronic misunderstandings, of what we’re all about here.  What he’s doing is lobbing shells into our camp.

14

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 06, 2009, 04:44 PM | #

No, I’m not saying he’s sent by the Jews, or sent by the FBI, or sent by whomever.  I’m saying he may be just someone here on his own trying to make trouble.

15

Posted by a Finn on June 06, 2009, 05:25 PM | #

Maltese seem to be good people with a great island and society to live in. They are worth protecting. They deserve more clear headed and calmer man with better policies than Lowell to represent them. A politician that in addition to anti-immigration policy would participate in the people’s lives, listen to them and design policies accordingly. No internationalism with Imperium Europe and no harmful and useless elite/ aristocracy to replace the current ones. Lowell is a good artist and he could live on the edge by hill climbing, flying or something like that instead of participating in politics, and the end results would be much better.

VNN pride is another mindless troll that would wither instantly with proper moderation.

Ps. It would nice to visit Malta in the future.

16

Posted by q on June 06, 2009, 05:52 PM | #

Take ‘VNN pride’ on his face value. What he needs to come to understand, is his rigid opinion isn’t going to popularize the White Preservationist cause one bit amongst the masses.

It’s the masses we are trying to win over, VNN pride! Get with the program.

17

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 06, 2009, 07:21 PM | #

I sense A Finn is a boots-on-the-ground practical-minded man who’s not so attracted to the abstract or the speculative.  But despite his reservations about Lowell’s overall vision I’m sure he would endorse him over whoever else is running for the MEP seat, Lowell’s opponents representing, essentially, the same degenerate forces on that island who tried to get Lowell put in jail (was that election held yesterday, by the way?).

18

Posted by White Preservationist on June 06, 2009, 09:39 PM | #

Re:q - “It’s the masses we are trying to win over, VNN pride! Get with the program.”

If only the pro-White movement could gain a strong, charismatic, inspiring, and ruthlessly brilliant leader to promote the pro-White cause. 

A good leader, along with an incorruptible inner-circle who are fanatically loyal supporters of that leader, is all that it takes to lead the masses (or at least those which can be won over to our side).

If a strong leader arises and is backed-up by a loyal inner-circle of fanatical supporters, the masses (or at least enough people to make a true difference) will naturally follow

I am reminded of a passage from the opening of BEOWULF: “The Lord had seen how long and sorely the folk had languished for lack of a leader.”

Also reminded of a chilling passage from the sickening Jewish TALMUD, the key text of our racial enemies: “The best of the gentiles should all be killed” (Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10).  Thus organized Jewry seeks to assassinate the best non-Jews (those who are incorruptible and capable of good leadership) before they are even able to begin truly leading.

19

Posted by Captainchaos on June 06, 2009, 11:01 PM | #

If only the pro-White movement could gain a strong, charismatic, inspiring, and ruthlessly brilliant leader to promote the pro-White cause. 

A good leader, along with an incorruptible inner-circle who are fanatically loyal supporters of that leader, is all that it takes to lead the masses (or at least those which can be won over to our side).

A Fuhrer who is the living embodiment of the will of his people to life, whom they follow with blind obedience, is a bit edgy for some.  Some prefer a philosophy that on the other hand tells the people what they ought to think and do, and why they ought to think and do it.  In other words, the key difference being that the people are less well mobilized and galvanized for exigent action in the pursuit of their will to life, and those things which are consistent with it, which are always dynamic - either ‘expanding’ or ‘shrinking’.  A Philosophy of Being is merely the conservative’s attempt at “revolutionary” stasis creation and maintenance.  To calm the waters of said dynamics utilizing philosophy so a Fuhrer will not be needed.  But what if dynamics dictate the necessity of a Fuhrer?  What does the Philosophy of Being have to say about that particularly?  Best not ask.

20

Posted by a Finn on June 06, 2009, 11:07 PM | #

White Preservationist: “If only the pro-White movement could gain a strong, charismatic, inspiring, and ruthlessly brilliant leader to promote the pro-White cause. 

A good leader, along with an incorruptible inner-circle who are fanatically loyal supporters of that leader, is all that it takes to lead the masses (or at least those which can be won over to our side).

If a strong leader arises and is backed-up by a loyal inner-circle of fanatical supporters, the masses (or at least enough people to make a true difference) will naturally follow.”

- Well, if all the numerous fanatical trolls is strewn with comparable commenters and a couple of writers, then you have a fanatical group. The person who has the ability to imagine and shout frenzily the most brutal things is your leader. Billions will die and we will win ... no, I mean 20 people, all who read this, will laugh. We will laugh too.

Anyway, could you, if the fanaticism has a tender and soft moment somewhere, explain the basic principles how to construct functioning laws. Thank you.

21

Posted by danielj on June 06, 2009, 11:18 PM | #

A Fuhrer who is the living embodiment of the will of his people to life, whom they follow with blind obedience, is a bit edgy for some.

For everybody in America, without exception. We aren’t wired that way. 

Some prefer a philosophy that on the other hand tells the people what they ought to think and do, and why they ought to think and do it.

Or a religion that does such. 

But what if dynamics dictate the necessity of a Fuhrer?

If it is a real necessity, than the Fuhrer will necessarily arise.

Incidentally, what happened to Neo-Nietzsche?

22

Posted by Captainchaos on June 06, 2009, 11:47 PM | #

For everybody in America, without exception. We aren’t wired that way.

You mean at the genetic level?  Of course not, you mean the inculcation in the minds of the living of the American cultural legacy, or the Founding Myth.  You think revolutionary change impossible then?  Best stick a fork in it right now if that is the case.

Or a religion that does such.

Not philosophy, nor theology, is for the rabble.  So it pretty much will be a “religion” they are given to believe, any way you slice it.

If it is a real necessity, than the Fuhrer will necessarily arise.

Species and sub-species have gone extinct countless times on this earth.  There is nothing really ‘necessary’ about their survival.  What I mean is, What does the Philosophy of Being have to say on the matter of ‘follow the Fuhrer or watch your people perish’ with only those choices given?  Is ‘respectability’ and ‘morality’ more important to the Philosophy of Being than, you know, being.

(Please note I did not once mention “Krauts” - LOL!)

Incidentally, what happened to Neo-Nietzsche?

 

Don’t know.  What happened to Happy Cracker/ex-PF?  That guy has some talent, plus he is English, and not a Kraut - which can’t hurt.  Everything goes to shit when you let those Krauts get one over on you.

23

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 12:11 AM | #

But Finn, if GW edited out the trollishness we never would have been treated to Silver’s foul-mouthed ‘hooker with a heart of gold’ attempt at redeeming us, and himself in the process.  But then again Rienzi and all of Wintermute’s sock-puppets (“cyber entities”) might come back.  LOL!  Only eugenics will get rid of our inveterate individualism and grade school pissiness.

24

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 12:50 AM | #

You can have elitism without blind obedience to a single leader. We might have followed Buchanan had he been elected (and some of us think he was) but very likely not with the title “fuhrer”.

25

Posted by gnipgnop on June 07, 2009, 12:54 AM | #

This VNN Pride fool sounds like half the posters on Skadi.
He could just as easily be someone from VNN though. That site has more than a few people who think southern Italians are “muds”, and who devote whole threads to bashing Armenians and Georgians.

26

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 01:03 AM | #

Such a small state must be a wonderful place to live - similar to Iceland and Faroe Islands.

What of the Basque people - are they to be wiped out too? The whole point of preserving Europe is the preservation of the diversity as it exists. We all want to preserve our roots and our lands as they are now - minus the last 50 years or so of massive alien invasion.

27

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 01:14 AM | #

We all want to preserve our roots and our lands as they are now - minus the last 50 years or so of massive alien invasion.

You mean as they once were (demographically), that is sans “muds”.  What to do with all those “muds”?

but very likely not with the title “fuhrer”.

You might be surprised to see what desperate people will do to survive.  They might even go for a total reconquest of all our former lands at that point.  One can hope.

28

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 06:57 AM | #

Their being nonwhite shouldn’t be as relevant as their being out of place. The Japanese right now are paying their unwanted foreigner workers to return to Brazil, and Israel will probably attempt some policy. There’ll be plenty of precedents by the time Europe wants to restore itself. If the BNP comes to power, it’ll offer to pay those who are out of place to return to where they belong.

As for America, survival rather than reconquest should be the focus. Those who aren’t in a position of power shouldn’t delude themselves.

29

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 07:44 AM | #

You mean at the genetic level?  Of course not, you mean the inculcation in the minds of the living of the American cultural legacy, or the Founding Myth.  You think revolutionary change impossible then?  Best stick a fork in it right now if that is the case.

It all depends on how to define “revolutionary” and “change” my friend.

Some other groups of people are the ones sticking the fork in it, I’m just the one crying out in pain.

I don’t mean that we aren’t capable of it on the genetic level since we’ve (well, not exactly me since I don’t have too much founding stock in me, but the European I do have in me is plenty capable of revolt) all already proven we are capable of it.

Not philosophy, nor theology, is for the rabble.  So it pretty much will be a “religion” they are given to believe, any way you slice it.

You mean the rabble can’t handle either or an well developed either? I think genetically we have the most capable rabble out there and if anyone can handle a “higher” philosophy it is our rabble which is larger and brighter than most.

Religion is an inescapable category so I agree. We live in a theocracy now, it is just the wrong Zeus.

Species and sub-species have gone extinct countless times on this earth.  There is nothing really ‘necessary’ about their survival.  What I mean is, What does the Philosophy of Being have to say on the matter of ‘follow the Fuhrer or watch your people perish’ with only those choices given?  Is ‘respectability’ and ‘morality’ more important to the Philosophy of Being than, you know, being.

I know what you meant.

Here is my take: the only “human right” is the right to fight for survival - Fuhrer, or sans Fuhrer. I don’t want a Fuhrer since I’m not a filthy, fantasist, fascist Kraut, but I’ll submit to one if it comes to down to it on everything except my religion.

Don’t know.  What happened to Happy Cracker/ex-PF?  That guy has some talent, plus he is English, and not a Kraut - which can’t hurt.  Everything goes to shit when you let those Krauts get one over on you.

Certainly in the case of the Cracker he got burned out. You can’t keep up that much posting unless you don’t have a job.

I might burn out myself here and retreat to some books for a while.

(Did you really get one over on him?)

30

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 11:51 AM | #

It all depends on how to define “revolutionary” and “change” my friend.

I mean “change” that is sufficiently “revolutionary” so as to alter the physical conditions of our living space in a way more conducive to our survival.

Some other groups of people are the ones sticking the fork in it, I’m just the one crying out in pain.

Well now, neither is sufficiently “revolutionary”.

we’ve…all already proven we are capable of it.

That is good, may that it is again.

You mean the rabble can’t handle either or an well developed either?

I mean that they don’t possess the intelligence to fully comprehend a philosophy.  So, they must be given their duties, their roles in the collective, and their expected tangible rewards for adhering to the former.  I can hardly believe anyone would make a controversy out of that.

I think genetically we have the most capable rabble out there and if anyone can handle a “higher” philosophy it is our rabble which is larger and brighter than most.

But of course, the genetic quality of our folk is on average higher, all things considered, than all others.

Religion is an inescapable category so I agree. We live in a theocracy now, it is just the wrong Zeus.

I think the Philosophy of Being would experienced by ‘the people’ as something more akin to a civic religion.

I know what you meant.

Congrats.

I’m not a filthy, fantasist, fascist Kraut,

LOL!

I’ll submit to one if it comes to down to it on everything except my religion.

I’m not the one who wants to breed out the ‘faith-gene’.  For me, religion is a side issue, one that possesses sufficient plasticity to be molded for our purposes.

(Did you really get one over on him?)

Not that I recall.  His thinking always seemed to me to be developing in the right direction, and provoked my own thought.  He is a high quality blogger.  Hope he returns.

31

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 12:26 PM | #

Their being nonwhite shouldn’t be as relevant as their being out of place.

So their being non-White should be irrelevant only to the degree that they are out of place because they are non-White?  Get this, all of the other peoples of the world largely accept that dichotomy because it is in their interest to do so.  Because we are their most robust competition, because they can then gang up on us, because they can then shame us into submission.  And because there is so much truth in “the West and the Rest” trope.

The Japanese right now are paying their unwanted foreigner workers to return to Brazil, and Israel will probably attempt some policy. There’ll be plenty of precedents by the time Europe wants to restore itself.

That precedent will not apply to us unless we assert it, and with sufficient power to back it up.  Remember, there is ‘the West and the Rest’, and for good reason they know it, and bid us not to.

If the BNP comes to power [my emphasis], it’ll offer to pay those who are out of place to return to where they belong.

It can be done, then let it be.

As for America, survival rather than reconquest should be the focus.

I believe total reconquest is ultimately necessary to our survival.  You object because you believe to do it would be “immoral”.  So I guess by your lights the encroachment of Third World peoples into our living space isn’t also “immoral”?

Those who aren’t in a position of power shouldn’t delude themselves.

The BNP, since it are not presently in power, should give up now because to strive for future power is delusional.  LOL!  Maybe we should breed out that ‘faith-gene’, per GW.

32

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 01:52 PM | #

I mean “change” that is sufficiently “revolutionary” so as to alter the physical conditions of our living space in a way more conducive to our survival.

Because I’ve read a substantial amount of your commentary I’m fairly certain it is more accurate to state that you mean that we deserve more than just “survival” and a political and social landscape that is conducive to us thriving.

Well now, neither is sufficiently “revolutionary”.

Where do you live Cap’n? Should we start our very own nationalist “move-on.org” or “meet ups?”

What is sufficiently revolutionary? Certainly we won’t achieve “it” through the ballot box, at least not in America. In fact, people that believe that have their own “faith gene” to deal with.

That is good, may that it is again.

Maybe it isn’t good. The first time is tragedy and the second time is farce right?

I mean that they don’t possess the intelligence to fully comprehend a philosophy.  So, they must be given their duties, their roles in the collective, and their expected tangible rewards for adhering to the former.  I can hardly believe anyone would make a controversy out of that.

I’m not trying to make controversy. I think they are a little more capable than we give them credit for however and I think that there exist many more of these capable fellows in our country than most of Europe. We still have a latent and benign racism (or malignant depending on how you look at it) here as well that I think they might be lacking across the pond. (Save in Russia and a few Eastern block countries)

The real point is, the philosophy will trickle down. You know, Heideggerian Reaganism or something. There is - as you stated - already a philosophy in this country and a theocracy and a Zeus. (Even a Fuhrer, if we wanna get down to tacks and call the fucking mooley in the White House what he really is)

I think the Philosophy of Being would experienced by ‘the people’ as something more akin to a civic religion.

As it has been always, as with the Greeks, as with the Romans, as with the European Christians.

I’m not the one who wants to breed out the ‘faith-gene’.  For me, religion is a side issue, one that possesses sufficient plasticity to be molded for our purposes.

I’m aware. You’re an ally in my book and I’ll buy the beers when you come to town.

Although, I guess my EGI is fundamentally opposed to GW’s since I have the faith gene, although I’ve got 1/2 English children on the way…

Good God Above I’m confused! How do I calculate this shit?

I wish I was a filthy Kraut, maybe I’d be better with fractions.

33

Posted by SM on June 07, 2009, 01:55 PM | #

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 04:26 PM | #

  Their being nonwhite shouldn’t be as relevant as their being out of place.

So their being non-White should be irrelevant only to the degree that they are out of place because they are non-White?  Get this, all of the other peoples of the world largely accept that dichotomy because it is in their interest to do so.  Because we are their most robust competition, because they can then gang up on us, because they can then shame us into submission.  And because there is so much truth in “the West and the Rest” trope.

  The Japanese right now are paying their unwanted foreigner workers to return to Brazil, and Israel will probably attempt some policy. There’ll be plenty of precedents by the time Europe wants to restore itself. 

That precedent will not apply to us unless we assert it, and with sufficient power to back it up.  Remember, there is ‘the West and the Rest’, and for good reason they know it, and bid us not to.

We are not in this situation because the rest of the world put us in it—not even the jews.

We are in this situation because underling white male siblings have stolen their way to the top. They seek to keep otherwise strong males (from childhood when it all counts) down. The effect is other clades ascend.

“And the world turned upside down.”

The alpha beta gamma principle is the key. So is understanding dimorphic sexuality. (Hint: the females don’t volunteer femininity/ stunt-ification).

(And don’t bother responding with your assinine nonsense, you buffoon, gayass.)

 

If the BNP comes to power [my emphasis], it’ll offer to pay those who are out of place to return to where they belong.

It can be done, then let it be.

  As for America, survival rather than reconquest should be the focus.

I believe total reconquest is ultimately necessary to our survival.  You object because you believe to do it would be “immoral”.  So I guess by your lights the encroachment of Third World peoples into our living space isn’t also “immoral”?

Morality is a relative construct.

There is only defeat and victory, blindness and sight.

God’s merciful plan for us all…

34

Posted by q on June 07, 2009, 02:46 PM | #

Morality is a relative construct. - SM

The RCC teaches: Morality is not a relative social construct, rather, it’s an absolute truth. That’s one BIG reason why the Left (gays, moral-relativists, etc.) revile the Church so much.

 

(Even a Fuhrer, if we wanna get down to tacks and call the fucking mooley in the White House what he really is) - daniel j

 

I think Mullah would be an apt description President Hussein too. POTUS - Mullah Mooley.

Although, some discribe him as the first female President:-

In the same sense that Toni Morrison claimed Bill Clinton was our first black president, Barack Obama could be thought of as another groundbreaker: our first female president. He displays every trope of femininity more than any female “who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime” (to borrow Morrison’s phrase about Clinton).


Obama’s feminine side may have developed in tandem with our cultural shift from an industrial to a knowledge economy as suggested by BizzyWomen.com :


“Men are less suited than women to the knowledge economy, which rewards supposedly female traits such as sensitivity, intuition, and a willingness to collaborate,” reports Peter Coy in Business Week. “Men have tended to do better in the hierarchies, following orders and relying on positional power.”


Obama is filled with sensitivity (one might even say, empathy), he would rather talk than fight, is highly (yet selectively) compassionate and to top it all off, he has a finely tuned sense of fashion.  B.O. attempts to collaborate with Europeans, South Americans, Muslims and nearly everyone except the citizens of red state America.  Oh, and his position on abortion and women’s rights is nearly identical to that of the Choicers at NARAL and NOW.  Ms. Magazine felt so simpatico with B.O. that he was featured on their special Inaugural issue cover, ripping open his shirt to expose his “This is What a Feminist Looks Like” T-shirt.  While the cover was somewhat controversial for the magazine, the editor pointed out that (Obama) purportedly told them: “I am a feminist.” According to Ms., Obama “ran on the strongest platform for women’s rights of any major party in American history.”


In addition, Obama has surrounded himself with women in most important security and foreign policy positions in his administration.  While some might choose to describe BO as our first metrosexual President, the clincher is that, consistent with all outward appearances, the Obama administration fights like a girl.


The Axis of Evil has certainly picked up on this.  Not a week goes by without Kim Jong-Il or Iran’s Ahmadinejad or some other pipsqueak tin-pot wannabe figuratively bitch-slapping   the POTUS.  Every week another news story features another fascist thug playing the role of Moe from the Three Stooges to Obama’s Shemp .


Last week Little Kim East and the Mighty Mahmoud were like tag-team midget wrestlers ganging up on the sputtering Obie One.  First Korea’s Crackpot in Chief set off a nuclear   fireworks display smack dab in the middle of our Memorial Day Weekend.  Meanwhile, Ahmadinejad continued demanding apologies from Obama for imagined American offenses against the Iranians while announcing that the Persian nuclear program is a fait accompli. Yesterday in Cairo, Obama compliantly apologized to Iran for thew ovcerthrow of Mossadegh. Then the 12th-Imam-stepper challenged Obama to a debate at the U.N.  Inquiring minds want to know:  would a teleprompter be allowed at the debate?


Down South, Raul and Fidel Castro played their own brand of good cop/bad cop   on our Dear Sensitive Leader, while their fellow Latin-American banana-republicans took turns exhorting President BO to join the Great Marxist Books Club and channeling Dennis Miller’s rants of yore with mucho hammering of America. 


Obama’s response to all the extra-curricular Axis of Evil activity and Gringo-Go-Homerism?  “Just words”.  With the arsenal of the world’s sole remaining superpower available to him, Obama sounds more like the U.N. Secretary General scrambling for the best euphemism to downplay each situation than a serious statesman with the greatest military and economic might on the planet to back him up. No matter what other qualities our belligerent enemies might have, they are definitely men of action.  And regardless of our neophyte President’s desire to chat and make friends, the leaders of North Korea, Syria, Iran and Cuba remain our enemies.  No matter how many “stern warnings” and U.N. resolutions you can cook up with the gals down at the U.N. coffee klatch, these busy thugs will keep upping the ante precisely until action is taken against them.


Unfortunately, any meaningful action by this administration is highly unlikely, as Obama understands that many Democratic and independent voters, especially women, were eager to move from hard-power locker-room tactics to a soft-power sewing circle approach. Less towel-snapping and more towel color coordinating, less steroids and more sensitivity. 


Maureen Dowd was nearly giddy here as she noticed that, in a debate with Hillary Clinton:


Obama tapped into his inner chick and turned the other cheek. (Ibid)


Don’t hold your breath waiting for our Apologist-in-Chief to do anything more than talk nice and try to make friends with the dark forces on our planet that wish us only harm.


I’m just grateful that Obama had the good sense to bow to the Saudi King   at the G20 summit in London. At least he didn’t curtsey.

35

Posted by Captainchaos on June 07, 2009, 03:07 PM | #

Shit Monger,

Morality is a relative construct.

There is only defeat and victory, blindness and sight.

God’s merciful plan for us all…

And “defeat” and “victory”, “blindness” and “sight” are not also “relative consruct[s]”?  LOL!  I guess coherent thought is not part of “God’s” plan for you.  Twit.

The alpha beta gamma principle is the key. So is understanding dimorphic sexuality.

What is in play is the evolved, innate complementarity of European Man and Woman, and the acquired, maladaptive cultural breakdown of adaptive sex roles that, yes, take into account “dimorphic sexuality”.  Those that have the collective interests of our people at heart, our collective health, are not in the positions of power that define culture.  Significantly, it is Jews.  And they see their interests as coeval with our degradation, if not complete destruction. 

Daniel,

Where do you live Cap’n?

I live in Michigan.  A place I would like so see not despoiled by Third Worlders.  And those that are here, all of them (save Amerindians), I would like to leave.

Although, I guess my EGI is fundamentally opposed to GW’s since I have the faith gene, although I’ve got 1/2 English children on the way…

That would be your genetic interests, your own progeny and immediate family.  When it comes to the ‘faith-gene’, GW’s own genetic interests are in opposition to his ethnic genetic interests in that particular case; since certainly more English have the ‘faith-gene’ than don’t.  Unless, of course, as I’m sure he would contend, the ‘faith-gene’ is inherently antagonistic to the EGI of the English.  I don’t buy that.  I’ve yet to get into the nitty gritty of formulaic EGI calculations myself, which I believe I should do.  Which is the main reason I hold off on submitting main posts, I don’t feel as yet qualified.  Of course Shit Monger could always post in my stead.

36

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 03:50 PM | #

I live in Michigan.  A place I would like so see not despoiled by Third Worlders.  And those that are here, all of them (save Amerindians), I would like to leave.

I’ve got family near Lansing. I’ve yet to spend any significant amount of time there however. Just small stays in the Detroit airport. I might drive out there this summer before the baby is born just to see the Northern part of the state. There are a lot of good, far-right, Rushdoony reading Protestants out there!

And those that are here, all of them (save Amerindians), I would like to leave.

Wow! The Captain of Chaos has a heart and the ability to scare website proprietors into a “no comments” policy!

That would be your genetic interests, your own progeny and immediate family

I’m gonna order the Salter book this week but I just don’t see how EGI works in “real time” in America. Everybody I know identifies as “White” or mixed Euro. They just don’t think on the “lower” ethnic level. (Except for some of my “Irish” friends who are a bit over excited about their Irish-ness)

When it comes to the ‘faith-gene’, GW’s own genetic interests are in opposition to his ethnic genetic interests in that particular case; since certainly more English have the ‘faith-gene’ than don’t.

Being militantly materialistic and militantly reductionist will always drive one into positions of logical incoherence. I don’t think EGI is capable of accounting for all of reality.

I don’t buy that.  I’ve yet to get into the nitty gritty of formulaic EGI calculations myself, which I believe I should do.

We all should.

Which is the main reason I hold off on submitting main posts, I don’t feel as yet qualified.  Of course Shit Monger could always post in my stead.

You are preeminently qualified and you know that. Perhaps you just don’t have anything to say without being prompted?

I’m still working on my philosophy, maybe I’ll get posting next year sometime. Plus, keeping a woman happy - even one who is almost 100% in my ideological corner - is arduous and highly time consuming.

37

Posted by Guessedworker on June 07, 2009, 03:57 PM | #

GW’s own genetic interests are in opposition to his ethnic genetic interests in that particular case 

That depends on the articles of faith, doesn’t it?

38

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 04:10 PM | #

Speaking of being prompted, I was wondering how much goading we could get away with before GW showed up!

GW, our friend from London is out again and she has again offered me a job at her law firm if I promise to go to Uni. Also her father is the CEO of a rather large telecommunications company and that is a related field. I’m worried about 30% inflation rates out here in America and I think it might be *slightly* less horrible in the next decade in England.

How close are you to London GW? I can’t be out there without somebody to vent to or I’ll be promptly arrested for inciting racial hatred.

39

Posted by Guessedworker on June 07, 2009, 04:21 PM | #

Play away, guys.  I’m watching for clues as to the Europeans.

One hour from Victoria by rail, Daniel.  But don’t come to London if you wouldn’t like the enrichment of NY.

40

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 04:33 PM | #

I hate NY.

She assures me she lives in a nice suburb. I’ll send you the address in a private mail and you can confirm or deny. I’ve seen her place on Google Earth and it looks nice.

Additionally, she is well aware of my proto-fascist tendencies and is herself to the right of the general public on racial issues. As a barrister, she has to maintain professional distance so I don’t think she will be coming out in support of the BNP anytime soon but I’m sure that she understands and empathizes with those who do. Although, I think she has generalized disgust for politics in general and that extends to the BNP despite their falling outside the realm of traditional politics.

Regardless, I hate my home state of California and that is where I’ll be headed back to as soon as I finish my apprenticeship in Aug/Sept of this year. At least if I move to London and hate it I can be cosmopolitan, hyper-mobile and reactionary!

41

Posted by q on June 07, 2009, 06:52 PM | #

“I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative sterotypes of Islam wherever they appear”—President Hussein

42

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 06:58 PM | #

“I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative sterotypes of Islam wherever they appear”—President Hussein

Between that and the responsibilities of our government in fulfilling the requirements of the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act I’d say he has a whole fuckload of responsibility. I don’t think he’ll get around to any real work until after dinner since his entire day will be spent keeping tabs on Jacob and Esau.

43

Posted by q on June 07, 2009, 07:19 PM | #

Axelrod’s family tree: mother a writer in NYC for a communist publication. father moved in with “A MAN” to find himself.

EMANUEL an Israeli double agent and his brother whom he hired in the white house ezikiel wants to tax health care benefits that 87% of Americans have.

44

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 10:30 PM | #

CC,

it’s not only morality but possibility and marketing… First we establish a way to survive in America and build up relations with the other groups and grow. And as opportunities arise, we decide what actions should be taken.

I don’t see a need to declare reconquest of America, and I suspect such a proclamation would result in our losing whites and gaining various enemies, white and non. There’s no sense in debating though - we’ll never agree you and I. I’m focusing on fleeing to the hills and surviving where within I’d tackle political threats and opportunities as they arose; you’re focusing on building a popular mass white movement which I find to be of secondary importance.

In your mind you’re oversimplifying that the difference between us is baseless morality vs. Nietzschian will. That’s part of the difference, but it’s not the entirety and not even the majority. The way I see it, and I could be wrong, is survival is better than going out in a blaze of foolish glory.

45

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 10:34 PM | #

This might hit home with you.

Your view of me: baseless morality (me) vs. Nietzschian will (you).
My view of you: Machiavellian prudence (me) vs. foolish attachment to NS and reconquest (you)

I’ve never been your enemy, but your stances put you at odds with me due to our difference of views. At the end of the day though, we serve the same people.

46

Posted by Frank on June 07, 2009, 10:50 PM | #

Regarding the BNP, I think they’re in a vastly superior position to us. America is headed towards SA-style ethnic cleansing within the next 30-40 years. Youth is where the soldiers are, and half or nearly half this country’s fighting men will be nonwhite. Add to that the government and its military and the mass media will be fully against us, and you’ve got one Hellish scenario. If I survive to die of old age, I’ll consider myself lucky. And if I’m being pessimistic: the attitude has worked well for the Jews who arguably the most incredible people during the 20th century.

I don’t think there’s much to be gained from a national political approach. That’s likely a distraction that will result in our leaving the drawbridge down when the Huns storm in for loot and women.

No one fears the Amish, yet they’re mostly white (I hear they occasionally adopt nonwhites…) We should attempt a similar strategy for now - not with regard to technology but rather other facets. However, we should continue to push European pride and culture, albeit without the political element which would scare the powers that be.

Pretending to be in power and talking of all the things one would like to do in power will on create enemies. We’re not in power, and I don’t see any benefit to talking about reconquest. Doing so is fun, but it’s counterproductive, meaning it helps those who wish to erase America.

47

Posted by SM on June 08, 2009, 12:38 AM | #

And “defeat” and “victory”, “blindness” and “sight” are not also “relative consruct[s]”?  LOL!  I guess coherent thought is not part of “God’s” plan for you.  Twit.

The only incoherence here is in your skull.

I have no energy for the likes of you.

“(And don’t bother responding with your assinine nonsense, you buffoon, gayass.)”

You are a dumb sophister.

Isn’t there a comic book filled with negro caricatures in it you could be reading somewhere?

48

Posted by America on June 08, 2009, 04:06 AM | #

I’m gonna order the Salter book this week but I just don’t see how EGI works in “real time” in America. 

“EGI” is just a quantitative measure of racial group strength, best used to quantitatively express the instinctive sense of loss most people experience on seeing aliens infiltrate their living space.


it’s not only morality but possibility and marketing… First we establish a way to survive in America and build up relations with the other groups and grow. And as opportunities arise, we decide what actions should be taken.

I don’t see a need to declare reconquest of America, and I suspect such a proclamation would result in our losing whites and gaining various enemies, white and non.

There are a number of groups that will be receptive: the consciously ethnic minorities, who dislike one another but are united to beat whites (which they presently perceive being in their interest), and non-white, semi-white/quasi-white unhyphenated Americans, in whom the sense of loss is cultural.  However much it sucks, short of full-scale armed rebellion, that’s about the best that can be done, but it does offer solid reason to be hopeful. If you have better ideas, let’s hear them.

49

Posted by Frank on June 08, 2009, 07:47 AM | #

America,

I’m not sure what you’re proposing, but what I mean is to dig in in separate communities (to the extent such is legal - there are laws against exclusion for example) while promoting European racial identity and pride along with a culture that serves this - and yes discouraging miscegenation is vitally important while involving in some federal political battles (like immigration and amnesty and opposing affirmative action in favour of racially blind policies) without getting distracted as conservatives have over the past 50 years by relatively unimportant political battles. It doesn’t matter much for example if Peroutka wins 10000 votes instead of 1000 votes or if taxes are raised by 1% instead of 2% when they’ll only be raised again the next year.

And these communities then would need to figure what local elections they should try for while simultaneously promoting good relations with other ethnic groups. The desire would be to simply survive not to drive out the nonwhites. The only thing uniting this disparate mob of Babel is their hatred of whites. If they lose the symbol of the evil white oppressor, they lose their unity and purpose. Then they’ll fight amongst themselves as well as with us.

CC wants to stomp around crowing about reconquest and war. War will happen within this century for sure, but it shouldn’t be us who bring it, or who want it. War can even be bad, and there are ways to achieve goals without war - those who are serious about politics should carefully read Sun Zhu. It’s not only that war is immoral and horrible but that better results can be brought about by other means. CC isn’t interested in that. He just seems to want to play fantasy soldier. I respect that he wants to make an impact and is ready to do his duty, but I don’t find him productive at all.

And at the same time I’m not really productive posting here, but at least I’m not counterproductive.

If someone wants to start up a political party, that could be productive. But he’d need to be prepared to endure a very long struggle, and he’d need to realise that his existence is as a symbol to inspire and rally others. The BNP seems to have remade itself sometime early this decade, and a competent party that doesn’t wish to be a de facto enemy of its own race would need to learn how the BNP cleaned up its image. Good intentions might get a fool into Heaven, but at this late hour America cannot endure fools. Well-intending fools who unintentionally greatly harm their own race should be metaphorically banished to Siberia.

I’m not personally interested in a political party - that’s not what I want to do. Those who do want to go that route should look to the best alternative we have in America, which really serves just the same as a party, and that’s the CofCC.

50

Posted by Frank on June 08, 2009, 08:10 AM | #

Maybe America is in the darkness before the dawn, but I suspect rather it’s going to continue growing much darker. Europeans might laugh at how pathetic this sounds, but the best we can do right now is to have many children and ensure they’re raised properly. Encourage others to have white children too, and when still young - sure why not. But before doing anything else, ensure that you yourself have many children and raise them properly, free from the evil mass media and education system that pollutes young minds today.

Too many efforts have been utterly wasted, including my own. We need to humble ourselves and face just how dire and pathetic our current situation is. This is not our country; we are now one minority among many. We are not in position of power. We are widely hated and envied and thus in danger. Europe has deeper roots, has an ancestral culture, and is less transient and diverse even among its “whites” - there are so many countless ways that our situation is inferior to Europe’s. These weaknesses must be understood and then faced.

I don’t have all the answers and I’m not any sort of political expert, but I’m not the only one who sees the US situation as such.

Anyway, now that the European results are back, I ought to heed my own advise and tend to other matters. These elections are sure inspiring. And I don’t mean to be too harsh on CC. I went through the same phase when younger. He might decide I’m wrong too, which wouldn’t be a first.

51

Posted by Dasein on June 08, 2009, 10:20 AM | #

Speaking of Salter, I read once (I believe on gnxp) that Cochran ‘considers him a loon’ (or something like that).  Seems strange, seeing as how Harpending wrote an appendix for Salter’s book.  But maybe Cochran has his own reasons for not being partial to Salter’s work.  Seems Harpending is friendly with a whole range of people (private correspondences with MacDonald and Salter, took part in Hart’s PWC conference, comments at gnxp), but I don’t know what his opinion is on non-White immigration.  Most of what I know is via rumours or inference, so I was wondering if anyone has a more informed idea of Cochran and Harpending’s views on WN (or whatever we are).

52

Posted by Captainchaos on June 08, 2009, 07:02 PM | #

America is headed towards SA-style ethnic cleansing within the next 30-40 years. Youth is where the soldiers are, and half or nearly half this country’s fighting men will be nonwhite. Add to that the government and its military and the mass media will be fully against us, and you’ve got one Hellish scenario.

Frank, you just made my case for me.  You have finally come out and all but said it, if we do not cultivate our strength what remains of our unmongrelized people will be exterminated on the North American continent.  You should read up on GT’s strategy of self-sufficient communities, local political empowerment, bartering, and para-military training in the upper left hand corner of the homepage under Practic .  If politics and mass movements are of no use to us we must withdraw from the system and build our own parallel system.  But as you adumbrate, and as GT has stated, we will have to fight the system at some point - they will never let us go, never let us secede.  They want to see us genetically annihilated, and the Jews are the driving force behind it.

53

Posted by Frank on June 08, 2009, 11:23 PM | #

CC,

If politics and mass movements are of no use to us we must withdraw from the system and build our own parallel system.

I’ve been making that same point for years. I just don’t say it as you do nor do I sit on the same point for hours on end, refusing to allow any other topic to be discussed.

Reg. my being a “faileo”, I’ve defended these stances at various paleo sites without ever getting in trouble with them. They tolerate us if we respect them - indeed when Francis was alive it was quite evident that many were very racial. You praised Mathew Roberts one time for what he wrote at taki and then later Jared Taylor posted there - both were very racial albeit with a different approach than you took. Both were tolerated.

Admittedly, Fellist told me he got banned at takimag for a single comment made there, and he’s very reasonable, so maybe they aren’t always tolerant, lol.

—-

A cultural movement is also very good and part of what I meant - if building white identity isn’t cultural then what is it? Culture can = race. Culture can promote racial identity if it’s designed to do so. However, obviously the bromides are not worth preserving if not serving the race.

Some good cultural videos: Ygg movie list and there are various educational gatherings growing all over the web - they’re still disparate postings but surely soon someone will gather them all into more professional displays.

James Edwards posted regarding how Culture11 was a failure to become a hip “conservative” site, but we could attempt the same with regard to a truly hip (entertaining) truly racial site, albeit not including the NS videos you so dearly love, at least I wouldn’t include those. We should instead focus on the wonderful things that have come from Europeans and are still being developed, not to march to and feel powerful about but rather to identify with and feel spiritual about - which is a very significant difference. Similarly, we should attempt to revive a European martial arts, but again it would be in part to appreciate what is truly European not to pursue power.

There’s something in the NS approach I find absolutely appalling. It’s a void, a lack spirit - utterly depressing and modern. And it could be that I simply misunderstand, but I get that sense whenever I see NS material - like my soul is being sucked out and eventually I’m grasping out for something beautiful, something to remind me of the joy of living. Nationalism is spiritual - it is fun; but for me the NS stuff makes it not so. And I know you’ve refrained from the label of NS, but the spirit lives on.

That’s not to say I desire a degenerate joy, but achitecture, music, stories, videos, pictures, etc. can all be a great deal of fun. Virtuous culture can be fun. Culture and fun can be strength.

For my own part, I continue to talk about what should be done instead of doing it myself. I’ve read a lot of the earliest Nordic, Celtic, and Greek tales though, so I’m building what I know. And I’ve gathered some other material, so I’m slowly moving towards such an objective, or perhaps helping to pave the way for another if someone beats me to it.

54

Posted by Frank on June 08, 2009, 11:31 PM | #

Put another way: people don’t just need to see images of marching and power and valour and glorious political speeches… They need to know why they are fighting.

The logical argument that we’re driven by biology to spread our genes is too cold and depressing. When hearing that stuff, people are want to jump out windows to escape the cold abyss, or otherwise escape (perhaps by metaphorically sticking head in sand).

Men fight for their homelands, but they fight for the memories there, for the joy they’ve had there, for their wives and loved ones and children and the beauty - the art and other wonderful things that have been produced.

We can’t build a cultural movement on each man’s wife or kids, those attachments are much too particular for a larger movement, but we can build attachment to the various cultural works which again can promote the race.

So, while I reject, or at least do not see myself as being of best use to, a political movement. I do approve of some cultural activity. Nature can be lovely too. We can each love our particular local fauna and flora.

Kalb had a link to an architectural book, but I don’t see it atm. I just need to get a blog so I can organise all my own material rather than reposting in comments like this. Over the years, as with probably everyone else, I’ve accumulated quite a bit.

55

Posted by the Narrator... on June 09, 2009, 03:42 AM | #

All I know about Malta is that it is very, very, very overcrowded.

Is there a place with images of Maltese people or information on their genetics?

.
.
.

James Edwards posted regarding how Culture11 was a failure to become a hip “conservative” site, but we could attempt the same with regard to a truly hip (entertaining) truly racial site….

Posted by Frank on June 09, 2009, 03:23 AM

I may be way off, but I have a suspicion that if there is one thing that the majority of White people are going to come to loathe over the next decade, it’s things that are “hip”.

The era of the cold pizza and stale Doritos culture is ending right now and increasingly people will look more appreciatively at an old fashioned meat and potatoes culture again.

What’s needed is something that represents tradition and familiarity. Something that is as old as it is consistently relevant.

I expect Prodigal Son Syndrome is about to descend on a great many of our people and they will look towards home for a safe harbor.
And home ain’t flashy or hip or exciting, but by God it’s familiar, safe and nourishing.

Logistically though, Western Civilization as a dominant force in North America is finished. Whites make up around 53% of the population of America and around 48% of the population of North America (the US, Canada and Mexico).
And our percentages are dropping rapidly.

There’s something in the NS approach I find absolutely appalling. It’s a void, a lack spirit - utterly depressing and modern. And it could be that I simply misunderstand, but I get that sense whenever I see NS material..

Posted by Frank on June 09, 2009, 03:23 AM

Probably because of the way it is presented in MSM. Most of the pictures I’ve seen of that era in Germany show a happy people embracing and reveling in their own race and it’s culture.

At least if I move to London and hate it I can be cosmopolitan, hyper-mobile and reactionary!

Posted by danielj on June 07, 2009, 10:58 PM

You poor, poor man.

You come from Mexifornia and are headed to Londonistan!

A city, any city, is a blight upon the earth, but Londonistan! It’s right up there with New York, LA and Detroit as places most likely not to be missed should they suddenly sink into the earth, never to be seen again.

You have my sympathies.

....

56

Posted by danielj on June 09, 2009, 05:07 AM | #

One isn’t sure.

We’ll see what the future holds unless we dies.

57

Posted by q on June 09, 2009, 09:23 AM | #

A picture can tell a thousand words:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2267740/posts

58

Posted by America on June 09, 2009, 09:47 AM | #

Frank, I don’t disagree with anything you have said.  My point was that there exist groups—and I listed who I think they are—who’d be receptive to WN survival/separation objectives provided they see something in it for themselves (and if they can’t see it it’s up to WNs to provide it)—namely that they will live better as a result. This means that the dwindling number of whites is not necessarily the problem it otherwise might be and that, perhaps more importantly, there is logical reason to think mainstream political action could deliver racial salvation, and logical reason to think it’d do so with on a far bigger chunk of territory than could be carved out by hiding in caves playing Rambo. In any case, if this approach fails, Rambo is always an option, so nothing is really lost in the attempt.

59

Posted by danielj on June 09, 2009, 11:36 AM | #

You poor, poor man.

You come from Mexifornia and are headed to Londonistan!

A city, any city, is a blight upon the earth, but Londonistan! It’s right up there with New York, LA and Detroit as places most likely not to be missed should they suddenly sink into the earth, never to be seen again.

You have my sympathies.

I don’t need sympathy. I need money and some advanced degrees.

60

Posted by gnipgnop on June 12, 2009, 03:22 AM | #

Where do you get the 53% White figure?

The most recent Census figure says about 65% non-Hispanic White. If you get rid of Arabs, Persians and Turks (at most 3% of the population, who aren’t usually considered White by themselves or others) it goes down to about 62%. If you get rid of Jews (mostly Ashkenazim who most non-WN people consider White) you get about 59%.  (Jews are a little less than 3% of the population according to most estimates.)
That’s 6% difference.

Is it that the number of non-Whites (e.g. Mexican immigrants) is underestimated? Or is it that there are others (besides Middle Easterners and Jews) who shouldn’t be considered White?

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Next entry: LA Times reports Whittle and Sheppard straight and true

Previous entry: Thinking past Sunday

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

DanielS commented in entry 'Sir Gerald Howarth stands by letter: Time for England to fight back' on 09/01/14, 08:50 PM. (go) (view)

Guest Lurker commented in entry 'Sir Gerald Howarth stands by letter: Time for England to fight back' on 09/01/14, 02:42 PM. (go) (view)

Guest Blogger commented in entry 'Gregory Bateson on Pathology - Context and Relation' on 09/01/14, 04:44 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 09/01/14, 02:52 AM. (go) (view)

Guest Blogger commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/31/14, 04:54 PM. (go) (view)

Guest Blogger commented in entry 'Sir Gerald Howarth stands by letter: Time for England to fight back' on 08/31/14, 01:59 PM. (go) (view)

JEWISH NATIONAL FRONT commented in entry 'Palestine – Peace AND Apartheid?' on 08/31/14, 03:48 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Our football coaches weren't Marxists imposing black integration' on 08/31/14, 03:02 AM. (go) (view)

Guest Blogger commented in entry 'Britain's Camp of The Saints' on 08/30/14, 11:59 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'swift passage' on 08/30/14, 08:51 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Britain's Camp of The Saints' on 08/29/14, 10:19 AM. (go) (view)

taylor swift commented in entry 'swift passage' on 08/28/14, 11:41 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Can violence come?' on 08/28/14, 04:53 PM. (go) (view)

Søren Renner commented in entry 'swift passage' on 08/28/14, 01:45 PM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Can violence come?' on 08/28/14, 10:47 AM. (go) (view)

alex commented in entry 'Physiognomy and Liking: My Experience' on 08/28/14, 10:24 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'An American Lectures Dr. Lister' on 08/28/14, 04:16 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'It has a voice already.' on 08/28/14, 02:15 AM. (go) (view)

uKnLeo commented in entry 'swift passage' on 08/27/14, 09:42 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Gregory Bateson on Pathology - Context and Relation' on 08/27/14, 05:17 PM. (go) (view)

Dude commented in entry 'Gregory Bateson on Pathology - Context and Relation' on 08/27/14, 04:42 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'A Conspiracy Theory of A Conspiracy Theory to Divert From White Male Dasein' on 08/27/14, 03:59 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'the cat and the song' on 08/27/14, 03:34 PM. (go) (view)

Luq commented in entry 'The eternal nation in its rural hearth' on 08/27/14, 12:34 PM. (go) (view)

LOL! commented in entry 'Men are the losers of the sexual revolution' on 08/27/14, 12:32 PM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/27/14, 04:52 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Are we to be cannon fodder for war on behalf of White plutocrats?' on 08/27/14, 02:58 AM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/27/14, 12:09 AM. (go) (view)

Stephen Nieman commented in entry 'Guns, Lies and Forgeries:A Bible Story' on 08/26/14, 09:55 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/26/14, 05:27 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/26/14, 02:58 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/26/14, 02:02 PM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Englishmen fight back - and win.' on 08/26/14, 11:02 AM. (go) (view)

mario commented in entry 'Elitism, secrecy, deception … the way to save white America?' on 08/26/14, 08:21 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Fratricidal Tendency' on 08/26/14, 05:45 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Anti-White Media

Audio/Video

Controlled Opposition

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa

affection-tone