|
|
J’AIME LE NUIFAlex Linder’s latest jeu d’esprit gets to its point quickly.
Is it true? Is it hurtful? Is it necessary? Perhaps there are those who, having read KMD, still find Alex’s words too strong a meat. Such might ask that we restrict ourselves to a Galtonian dogwhistled dialect of political speech, or say that Linder says in the agora what should be uttered only in the privy. They might even be unsure how to answer if they were asked which side the present writer takes. Not only dull, but the cause of dullness in others, is the verdict on them if they think that. Discuss. Posted by Søren Renner on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 05:29 PM in Comments:2
Posted by Desmond Jones on January 15, 2008, 06:55 PM | # If Linder really believes what he writes, why was he so soft on Stix?
And on to the comments:
Go figure! http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2007/10/white-supremacist-jew-and-knoxville_2125.html 3
Posted by Svigor on January 15, 2008, 07:25 PM | # Is it true? It’s true in a non-rigorous way, i.e. it’s an oversimplification, but it’s good enough for government work. One rub is that their control is entirely ephemeral and dependent on the willingness of the controlled (probably one of several reasons for their hysterical behavior when challenged). The question is academic in some contexts; e.g., Jews have made themselves our enemies, and whether they “rule” America or just sway it or whatever doesn’t change that. Nicholas Stix is what I call a righteous Jew; he’s doing as well as he can whilst still being a Jew; to go further and recognize and acknowledge the full truth would mean ceasing to be a Jew, in a practical sense. Is it hurtful Depends. In some ways yes (language, not so much message), but VNN has its demographic. I think we do need a healthy radical racial right, if only for purposes of triangulation. Is it necessary? What? A degree of honesty about Jews? Depends on the audience I guess. I suspect that sympathy for Jews is a mile wide and an inch deep (1. enforced by Jews, which only helps vis-a-vis detectable behavior, and can end up being counterproductive 2. depends on a dishonest reading of history, and listener ignorance in general 3. is directly opposed to non-Jewish self-interest, which can’t be good for its long-term prospects). Talk in reasonable tones and have your arguments and facts squared away, and you can demolish typical philo-Semitism. given that Jews in America who are in a position to help people go out of their way for gentiles, often at the expense of their fellow Jews. What a load of horseshit. Maybe Stix can cite some examples of Jewish MOVEMENTS acting contra the several movements mentioned by MacDonald (there’s not even one, of course). The kind of “help” we get from Jews, we’re better off without. Gentiles should love Jews. Ah, that’s the Jew I’ve come to know and love. How could anyone NOT love that? Linder states a desire to make Stix into a Jewish Nazi - has he really been paying attention all these years? The redundant bent of that term aside, does he really think Stix will succumb to the “the other fella has a point of view” silliness that so many whites seem to carry as congenital defect? Jews seem about as free of that defect as any people, ever. 4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 15, 2008, 09:04 PM | # Ezra Levant, Canadian publisher, was summoned before the Canadian Human Rights Commission for interrogation preparatory to possible prosecution over publishing, a while ago, the Danish Mohammed cartoons. There’s a series of videos on YouTube showing his exchange with the investigator (click on link at “interrogation,” above, to view). Here‘s another video in the series, titled “Opening Statement.” Every word out of Levant’s mouth in these two videos is right but the irony of the Jews’ being hoist with their own petard just screams out at you as you watch: Levant of course is Jewish and it was the Jews in Canada, as it’s been their co-tribalists in the U.S., who were the prime movers in setting up these Orwellian commissions which have now come back to bite them, the Jews, in the ass. In the last video linked, “Opening Statement,” Levant says (almost half-way through),
Does that apply to Zundel, Fromm, and all the others, Messrs. Borovoy and Levant? Or does it apply only to Jews who want to exercise free speech in order to say not-nice things about Moslems? (Rhetorical question, of course: no one is under any illustions as to how the Jews will answer.) 6
Posted by Desmond Jones on January 15, 2008, 11:28 PM | # (Rhetorical question, of course: no one is under any illustions as to how the Jews will answer.) Or 99% of Canadians, at least English Canucks. French Canadians can even go so far as raising the issue of the kosher tax, but in English Canada it’s fucking sickening. 7
Posted by Andy on January 16, 2008, 12:44 AM | # I think it says a lot of intellectual acumen of the opponents of this site that they resort to spamming it with porn. Are the offending IP addresses being banned? 8
Posted by bbgun on January 16, 2008, 12:51 AM | # Svigor says: to go further and recognize and acknowledge the full truth would mean ceasing to be a Jew, in a practical sense. Isn’t that required of all Jews by all anti-racists, and by all people unwilling to submit to Jewish rule? How could you be a Jew, and so support Jewish cultural and ethnic continuity without keeping alive first the OT and Talmud, and then inevitably the virulent racial-hatred of non-Jews? (Wintermute suggested here that Simone Weil was the one good Jew. I have my doubts because of her letter to French authorities insisting they define the Jew, but I agree the door ought to be left open - one day a good Jew may arise, you never know…) 9
Posted by Bill on January 16, 2008, 12:59 AM | # Well, the answer depends on what your centricity is in framing your statement. If you are Euro-centric, you will draw back from the above line and seek to merge Jewish mendacity & hatred into all the other ethnic- and religious-based anti-white movements, and discuss it and act on it with the subject in every sentence being European or European American with or without Christian tacked on. As, for example, the difference between (a) being against the kosher tax on the ground that it removes food from impoverished European American Christians, or (b) being against it because it unjustly enriches Jewish functionaries in furtherance of a Jewish plot. There is no policy debate or discussion that cannot be conducted about European American Christians as the subject of discourse, ie, at the center of the discourse. Which brings us to the main line in this piece. Every time European Americans name the Jew, we strenthen him. Every time European Americans defend their young, we strenthen ourselves. This appears to be very, very hard to understand, but just try a thought experiment about black Americans. If the complaint is about rape, the argument can discuss black rape rates which puts them in the center. If the complain is about harm to European American women, we can discuss rape rates by all races, religions, and classes, and furthermore denounce the artificial barriers to (a) reparations to the victims and (b) vengeance by their fathers and brothers. When you keep centricity in mind, you can say just about anything about the Other. 10
Posted by cladrastis on January 16, 2008, 03:32 AM | # bowery’s comment above, “enslaved by the keepers of the keys to the grain stores” reminds me of an interview to which i recently listened with ben fulford, which can be found here: http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Benjamin_Fulford_070507.mp3 and here: http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Benjamin_Fulford_072307.mp3 these interviews are inherently anti-ashkenazic, and although i think fulford is a sellout (if, indeed, he’s telling the truth), he synthesizes many of the informational puzzle pieces i’ve gathered in the last few months/years in a satisfactory manner. his conclusions, are, of course, incorrect, but his information is spot on. yes, jews are deceptive and destructive, but i think this behavior reflects only a subsection (probably a very large one) of the ashkenazim - and as john denugent points out - this probably correlates with the psychopathic element within the ashkenazi population - just as we anglos are not inherently twisted, manipulative, or sadistic, but a significant portion of our psychopathic anglo elite are. (note also that the jews who are not part of this psychopathic elite are still semites - with all the personality traits that entails). the question i’ve been trying to unravel is why are the jewish elite (who seem to be intrinsically clannish w/ strong out-group antipathies) conspiring w/ the european and american “anglo” elites (who “seem” to have strong pro-aryan eugenic leanings - while simultaneously having no compunctions about eradicating their own aryan people). for that matter, why would the jewish rothschilds, using the american robber barons as proxies, fund the war efforts in nazi germany - which were aimed at expelling and disposessing fellow jews of their material wealth and resources? i think the answer is that the jewish and anglo elites see themselves as something entirely different from their jewish and anglo populations. they see themselves as a god-like race, and their goal is to consolidate power on this planet by enslaving (by encouraging dysgenic trends) and eradicating potential competitors. unfortunately… east asians are just as clever as their anglo and ashkenazi competitors, with a history that goes back at least as far as the civilizations of the near east, with secret societies of their own, with strong identities and group solidarity, and vast resources (check out a map of world-wide gold stores), and are not about to bow down to a bunch of apotheosized white devils - who are in the process of the destroying the whole damn world. undoubtedly a power struggle is emerging. thus, jews, per se, are not the enemies (though judaism is destuctive and exploitative in a western context). the enemies are those who hold the reins of power. if we free ourselves from them, the playing field changes - and so do the rules. 11
Posted by larch larchdsay on January 16, 2008, 07:25 AM | # “enemies are those who hold the reins of power” Question: how do those holding the power view the likes of Robert Lindsay? As dedicated enemy or useful idiot? I think the latter. Aren’t “left wing anti racist” groups at times funded by corporations? 12
Posted by Fr. John on January 16, 2008, 08:57 AM | # Is it true? “I know the Blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, but are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.” [St. John, Revelation 2:8,9] “A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.” - TALMUD, Choshen Ha’mishpat, 348 Is it hurtful? Christ on Calvary is the answer. The Jews will kill any and all that dare tell the truth. It is either them, or us. And Christ is not going back on that Cross, EVER AGAIN! Never forgive, never forget.
“An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property… by the secret societies which form Provisional Governments, and men of the Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them…. the Jewish race… co-operate with atheists; and all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom.” - Benjamin Disraeli
i. The Jews killed Christ - they are, and will remain for all time, the “Deicides,” or “Christ-killers;” Novus Ordo imposters calling themselves Pope’s pronouncements to the contrary, notwithstanding.
“Jews as individuals are great individuals—talented, ambitious, intelligent, smart. As a people, I would not give them as high a grade. Jews know how to hate.” - Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel
iii. Christendom (i.e., Europe) is the ONLY ‘Chosen People’ YHWH God, and Christ, His Son concerns Himself with…to the end of the World. The Church once knew this and preached it;[ have you never heard of Luther’s “The Jews and their Lies”?] the poets all spoke of it;[“The Battle of Lepanto,” Blake’s “Jerusalem”] Nations were built and grew great from this knowledge;[What IS ‘Manifest Destiny, anyway if not the outworking of the Dominion Mandate applied to Christendom?] and the Hagarenes (sons of Hagar, the one who did NOT get the ‘promise’ of Election and Grace, i.e, Muslims) as well as the Edomites (sons of Edom/Esau, the one who ‘sold his birthright for a mess of pottage- the very race from whom the Deicides themselves claim patrimony!) are forever ‘beyond the pale’ for ‘there is a great gulf fixed’ that shall ‘never be removed,’ as the Church has held as long as she has REMAINED the Church!!! “But if the Jews were to say, that the word, “In Isaac shall thy seed be called,” means this, that those born of Isaac should be reckoned to him for a seed, then the Edomites, too, and all those people, ought to be denominated his sons, since their forefather Esau was a son of his. But now so far are they from being called sons, that they are the greatest possible aliens…” St. John Chrysostom, Commentary on Romans, Homily XVI “The first day of the Indictus the kingdom of Ishmael, whose name is Mohammed, will defeat the race of the Palaeologus; it will conquer the Seven-Hilled City: It will make it his capital; it will conquer many nations…and the multitudes and nations from the West will engage in war against the kingdom of Ishmael by land and sea, and they will defeat Ishmael. But the blond nation along with its allies will utterly defeat the entire Ishmael…”- Tombstone Prophecy, Oracle of Emperor Leo the Philosopher As has been noted, “Yahweh [the Israelite God] is not just a tribal deity, but the God of the Universe. His Chosen People are not just another ethnos: they are the Sons of God, destined to rule the world.” [ALLEGRO, p. 162] From “Jewish Tribal Review,” op.cit. Well and good, then, but Compare this with I John 3:1-2!! Who truly IS the “Israel of God”? [Gal. 6;16] Judaism cannot now claim this blessing, nor this ethnos, since they are not ‘jews,’ as we have seen. (cf. Koestler’s “The Thirteenth Tribe”] The pagan nations, or Islam cannot claim this, for they worship not the True God! Who is left, if not Christendom? For was it not Christ Himself, that said He would make of us, ‘sons of the living God?” [I John 3:2] Is that a sort of ‘divine racism?’ Well, if those who deny Christ’s Messiahship choose freely to be outside of the Covenant, then - no. If one looks at the Choosing God, (“Ye did not choose me, I chose you” [John 15:16]) then perhaps. But, “who art thou, o Man, to talk back to God?” [Rom. 9:20] While Linder and other neo-pseudo ‘nazis’ (I say ‘pseudo,’ for the only TRUE ‘Nazi’ is an AshkeNAZI!) think they can revive a non-Christian pagan civilization…. as do all the rest of those who will not come to grips that to ‘fight the Jews,’ one MUST adopt the ONLY competing philosophy that EVER was victorious against the Talmudics- that is, Orthodox, Conciliar, Apostolic Christianity of a unified, racially-aware Christendom- in order to both answer this question, and to assure victory. Linder is correct… Victory is only THROUGH the Jews. But as the modern Talmudics are NOT Jews, nor ever HAVE been, but are merely the Edomitic bastards that Josephus calls them in his “Judean Wars” there is only ONE Other ‘Jew’ left, and that is Christ. He alone can give ‘rest to your souls.’ And as Luther noted, ‘And He will win the Battle.’
13
Posted by rustymason on January 16, 2008, 09:15 AM | # Cladrastis said, “... the jewish and anglo elites see themselves as something entirely different from their jewish and anglo populations. they see themselves as a god-like race, and their goal is to consolidate power on this planet by enslaving (by encouraging dysgenic trends) and eradicating potential competitors.” This is very similar to Henry Makow’s theory. Although, Makow ultimately says that the most powerful of the Jews is not entirely to blame because the satanic goys made them do it. 14
Posted by Maguire on January 16, 2008, 11:03 AM | # “This is very similar to Henry Makow’s theory. Although, Makow ultimately says that the most powerful of the Jews is not entirely to blame because the satanic goys made them do it.” Makow’s patter is recycled John Birch Society propaganda from the 1960s. He just dusted it off and renamed Welch’s “Insiders” to “Luciferians”. SSDD. 15
Posted by rustymason on January 16, 2008, 11:27 AM | # Maguire, just out of curiosity, do you think Robert Welch knew what he was doing from the beginning, or was he corrupted, or simply misinformed or misguided? What’s SSDD mean? 16
Posted by Maguire on January 16, 2008, 12:36 PM | # “Robert Welch knew what he was doing from the beginning, or was he corrupted”..? This page contains much of Revilo P. Oliver’s testimony on the Birch episode. RP Oliver was one of the founding members of the JBS. http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-Oliver.html A key extract… “After the conference between Welch and myself in November 1965, I determined to verify conclusively the inferences that his conduct had so clearly suggested, and, with the assistance of certain friends of long standing who had facilities that I lacked, I embarked on a difficult, delicate, and prolonged investigation. I was not astonished, although I was pained, by the discovery that Welch was merely the nominal head of the Birch business, which he operated under the supervision of a committee of Jews, while Jews also controlled the flow, through various bank accounts, of the funds that were needed to supplement the money that was extracted from the Society’s members by artfully passionate exhortations to “fight the Communists.” As soon as the investigation was complete, including the record of a secret meeting in a hotel at which Welch reported to his supervisors, I resigned from the Birch hoax on 30 July 1966 with a letter in which I let the little man know that his secret had been discovered.” In the light of that it’s understandable that many of the JBS’ “American Opinion” bookstore branches later evolved into “Bible Bookstores” of the Dispensational Zionist persuasion. 17
Posted by rustymason on January 16, 2008, 01:20 PM | # What percentage of Euros are fully racially aware and know (or strongly suspect) which race has been running things for so long? How much has this awareness grown in the last decade? 18
Posted by rustymason on January 16, 2008, 01:34 PM | # How does one people, so totally under the control of another, throw off its yoke? From the ground up or top down? Is bloody revolution the only way, as Germany tried to do, or is there a peaceful way? What percentage of Whites need to know the real situation in order for liberation to be possible? 19
Posted by Svigor on January 16, 2008, 01:52 PM | # Posted by Bill on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 04:59 AM | # Food for thought Bill. 20
Posted by Guessedworker on January 16, 2008, 02:43 PM | # Soren: Is it true? Is it hurtful? Is it necessary? No it’s not true. The only “way out” is through oneself, in effect. The goods we abstract from liberalism are the source of Jewish power over us. They come with that traditional sour Jewish love of subversion, and thus subverted we find ourselves contemplating our own vice and dispossession - with, for the most part, no idea why or how it came about or how to rectify it. This process would be rectified ... would come to a strangulated end if we had a philosophy that fed our nature. Alex Linder’s half-idea of “going through the Jew”, presumably with attendant violence, would leave unaddressed all the familiar panegyrics of hyper-individualism, egalitarianism and materialism. These thought-ways traffic Jewish cultural and political goods, and the destruction of one cannot be accomplished without the destruction of the other. Is Alex’s terminology hurtful? Yes, of course ... but to whom, that is the question. The answer arrives with the next question: Is it necessary? Well, Alex’s justification is that “Mental liberation is achieved only by calling things by their proper name.” Mental liberation, actually, is quite a big subject, and extends beyond even Jewish powers of enslavement. But alright, Jews go to a great deal of trouble not to be named. Mainstream politicians understand the costs of doing so. Alex, however, says that the cost (“is it hurtful”) is outweighed by the benefit (mental liberation). What we get from this is a game where one side, in the belief that its refreshing honesty will unleash an epidemic of the same among the white American people, identifies its enemy and says “You are a Jew!” The other side, delighted, immediately responds with its most treasured word-tool, “You are a Nazi!” “Jew!” “Nazi!” “Jew!” “Auschwitz!” ... Any mental liberation yet? Or is this a perfectly convivial relationship for the perpetual victim of irrational white hatred? Well, it should be obvious that nothing useful can come of this exchange while the moral superiority of the victim is so easily claimed by the Jewish ethno-aggressor. To “Know them, hate them, fight them” is simply the wrong approach. One must become in as public a way as possible the true victim. One must do everything to deflate and delegitimise Jewish status. One must apply the same weapons to Jews that they apply so successfully to whites, and do it without a trace of hatred. Contrary to the WN way, one must speak softly and reasonably, and from an unsullied heart, of Jewish hate and Jewish aggression. That’s what would impress our own people. It would help to free them, too. But only a revolution at the level of the prevailing political milieu will really accomplish that. 21
Posted by rustymason on January 16, 2008, 03:10 PM | # GW, can you recommend anyone to imitate? I mean, a writer who is taking the correct approach? 23
Posted by Guessedworker on January 16, 2008, 03:24 PM | # Of course, Tom, like anyone, comes with his own attitudes, filtered through his own, unique experience. But there is enough in his work to get at a way forward, IMO. 24
Posted by DavidL on January 16, 2008, 08:54 PM | # Guessedworker You really hit the mark when you said: “One must do everything to deflate and delegitimise Jewish status. One must apply the same weapons to Jews that they apply so successfully to whites, and do it without a trace of hatred. Contrary to the WN way, one must speak softly and reasonably, and from an unsullied heart, of Jewish hate and Jewish aggression.” This is great advice - short, sweet to the point. The Anglo/Saxon/European rooted man must think and in many instances learn again to Too much seeking after personal gratification and not thinking about why we are where Think before you thump. 26
Posted by Guessedworker on January 17, 2008, 03:33 AM | # Sorry May, it’s probably only a juvenile Third Worlder with a hate complex. We suffer one of his pictorial pukings most nights at the moment, during what is the small hours for me. By expressing his own hatred this way he might help to crystallise the thinking of as yet uncommitted whites who find the thread. He can’t harm us. 27
Posted by Max Nordau speaks, c. 1900 on January 17, 2008, 10:16 AM | # “Never before had I been in such perfect tune with Nordau. ... ... 28
Posted by ben tillman on January 17, 2008, 06:26 PM | # Soren, what’s “nuif”? Linder spoke of a Jewish Nazi. Nazi + Juif = Nuif 29
Posted by Fr. John on January 18, 2008, 11:02 AM | # “For the love of christ!” Precisely, May. BTW, I enjoy your site. I get links to it on many of my favorite pages. “Sorry May, it’s probably only a juvenile Third Worlder with a hate complex. We suffer one of his pictorial pukings most nights at the moment, during what is the small hours for me. “ And I hope, Guessed, you were not speaking of me. LOL. 30
Posted by onlooker on January 18, 2008, 12:16 PM | # “And I hope, Guessed, you were not speaking of me. I can say with almost certainty that GW was NOT speaking of you, Fr. John. He was referring to the pest that keeps posting interracial porn. BTW, Fr. John, what is your take on the Ashkenazi Jews being descendents of the Khazar tribe who converted to Judaism in the eighth century merely for political reasons? If the Ashkenazim are not descendants of the Jews from the Torah, how can they claim Israel to be their God given promised land…? 31
Posted by Charlie Prince on January 20, 2008, 08:00 PM | #
There is plenty of room to quibble with Linder on the Jewish Question. America’s racial decline was more complex than his presentation suggests. Still, he is basically right that Jews are awful, that they have to go, and that confrontation is necessary. 32
Posted by Guessedworker on January 20, 2008, 08:18 PM | # Go where? Alex recommends something “vertical”, which isn’t incredibly helpful of him. 34
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 20, 2008, 09:34 PM | # Israel’s creation was meant partly to “solve the Jewish problem”( * ). It hasn’t: the problem still needs solving. I advocate Euros and Jews living apart from each other, since what makes one happy makes the other miserable and vice-versa. Ideally, for me, they’d be given part of the U.S. — California, for example (they broke it, they’ve bought it), with the proviso they can’t move to the Euro nation to be reserved for Euros out of most of the rest of the U.S. (burned by the Jews once, shame on the Jews; burned by them twice, shame on the Euros). We won’t go live among them in their Jewish nation of Mexifornia or they us in what will be ours: the two shall remain separate, which they should’ve done long ago but better late than never. Each will be happier than it’s ever been. (Actually they won’t: the Jews, not being free-standing, won’t be content by themselves in Mexifornia but will be clamoring to enter Euroland: Jews have to “stand on” Euros in order to thrive. But if Euros have learned anything from the past two hundred years they’ll be turned down and told to stay in their own country.) * the problem which arises from Jews’ using influence they acquire, often considerable, for inflicting harm on Euro nations including the ones they live in, harm centered on working to beat down, in a multitude of ways, the legitimate, normal, healthy nationalism of those nations. 35
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 21, 2008, 01:08 AM | # For years I had respect for John Zmirak. That’s now plummeted — it just fell, from quite high to absolute zero in less than five minutes (let’s just say Galileo could’ve dropped my respect for John Zmirak from the Leaning Tower of Pisa in place of the cannonballs he used in that experiment he did). Reason: See here and in the comments thread thereunder how he trashes Brenda Walker, Jared Taylor, and Kevin MacDonald. He’s now on my Absolute Zero list. (Source) 36
Posted by Charlie Prince on January 21, 2008, 02:03 AM | # Fred, I browsed your link. I’m reminded yet again of why I dislike conservatism.* This is the second time this weekend. Here’s an excerpt from a recent exchange I had with Lawrence Auster.
*I’m referring to the “conservative movement” in the USA. This is not to be confused with what GW’s version. 37
Posted by Guessedworker on January 21, 2008, 12:16 PM | # Also not my version:-
38
Posted by GT on January 23, 2008, 03:14 AM | # Fred Scrooby writes: Ideally, for me, they’d (jews would) be given part of the U.S. — California, for example (they broke it, they’ve bought it), with the proviso they can’t move to the Euro nation to be reserved for Euros out of most of the rest of the U.S. I certainly would not object to giving the beautiful, natural desert and beaches of southern California to the jews and judeoconned gentiles. But, northern California? Perish the thought! Mountains, trees, snowpacks, water, waterways, and hydroelectric plants are an obsession of mine. 39
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 26, 2008, 06:01 PM | # Browsing Friedrich’s site just now, I clicked on a link to Ezra Levant’s site, posted in an entry. (On Ezra Levant, see my comment above, fourth down from the top of the thread.) Looking through Levant’s site a bit, I came across a frankly-worded expression of regret by him at the role a certain Jewish group (and in particular, a certain censorship-minded individual within that group) has played in criminalizing speech in Canada:
What Levant is referring to in that part about Richard Warman’s being “a foul-mouthed bigot” is this stuff — forgive me if this is old news but I hadn’t heard of it before now: apparently Warman and an official of the Canadian agency that brings all these hate-speech charges have been acting as agents provocateurs and setting up entrapments, “sting operations,” by logging onto sites they want to nail and posting comments employing over-the-top language under false pen names, then using that later as evidence against the targeted web-sites. 40
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 27, 2008, 08:30 PM | #
41
Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 02, 2008, 04:07 PM | # What the Jews want to see more of. How do we know they want to see more of it? By the behavior of essentially all their organizations and pressure groups: virtually without exception Jews shrilly, hysterically, savagely fight to thwart any move to remedy the problem documented in this video. When you fight savagely against those who would rectify a problem it means you don’t see it as a problem and you want it to continue — want more of it, in other words. Why would Jews want more of what’s in this video? (Why would anyone?) Part of it must be either they hate Brits and want them punished, or they have naught against Brits but perceive some advantage, accruing to themselves as a group, through the behavior recorded in the video — some advantage which is too important to pass up. 42
Posted by required on August 14, 2008, 08:54 AM | # “Contrary to the WN way, one must speak softly and reasonably, and from an unsullied heart, of Jewish hate and Jewish aggression.” So we have to become Jesus before criticizing Jews? I suppose certain breath exercises might aid in the proper exposition of Jewish malfeisance to laymen. 43
Posted by Guessedworker on August 14, 2008, 09:43 AM | # If the only way out of the imprisoning accusation of Jew-hatred is to offer none, so be it. Why confirm for the watching world everything of which we are accused? 44
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 28, 2008, 09:23 PM | # Jews fight tooth-and-nail to keep Canadian Euros under totalitarian thought-control: here are the commissions the Jews created and use for this purpose: Canadian media on the Canadian “Human Rights” Censorship
And here are the Jews who lobby these Star Chambers for their own ends:
And here’s a Jew who didn’t like being thrown under the bus by the Jews:
Next entry: God Is a Terrorist Previous entry: Myth versus certainty |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. zhrcwuwmkq commented in entry 'The end of Mel Gibson's career?' on 05/23/12, 11:46 PM. (go) (view) SEO Services commented in entry 'The Cubans of Miami' on 05/23/12, 11:11 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/23/12, 10:12 PM. (go) (view) Cockouche commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 09:40 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) assundaGymn commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/23/12, 08:41 PM. (go) (view) GlablePax commented in entry 'University official sentenced for child porn, blackmail' on 05/23/12, 08:23 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) cuiseur automatique seb commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 07:43 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:23 PM. (go) (view) 7 Year BA commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 09:19 PM. (go) (view) DARYL commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 08:57 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 08:31 PM. (go) (view) Church of Jed commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 07:40 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 05:56 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 11:37 AM. (go) (view) AnalogMan commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 11:29 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:42 AM. (go) (view) Srakotraqu commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 07:30 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:19 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 06:26 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 02:34 AM. (go) (view) Stephen commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/21/12, 06:33 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/21/12, 02:02 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by James Bowery on January 15, 2008, 06:12 PM | #
Agreed, there are few easier targets than “Nazis”. Beating a dead horse is about as courageous.
But this is a much older story.
Our instincts are of the relatively paleolithic individual confronting the neolithic citizen mob whose mind is enslaved by the keepers of the keys to the grain stores. Without independently secured subsistence, speaking truth to the theocratic mob’s power ends in crucifixion. Not all are cut out to be the Christ, nor even Spartacus. Death with honor, not freedom, is found in one’s crucifixion. Freedom is found only in the defeat of one’s enslaving enemy.
I cut some slack to the slave, admittedly and by definition “not truly free”, straining against his bonds. He remains a slave and therefore without honor but he lives for The Day when the slaves win their freedom.