|
|
Jews shutting down debate.A recent article in the JEWISHJOURNAL.COM entitled “The Professor the anti-Semites love,” is about the published works of Kevin MacDonald and is a good example of the techniques Jews use to ridicule and demean any publications they do not agree with. I won’t comment on most of the psuedoscientific objections as we have seen them all before. But I will make note of some of the most egregious errors and omissions that they surely are aware of when this was written. Foremost, as always, they are quite upset with MacDonald’s assertion that Jews have, innately, very high mental abilities. However, Steven Pinker a couple of years ago was giving lectures on how Ashkenazi Jews were genetically superior to all other races/ethnies and how proud Jews should be of this fact. Steven Pinker is a darling of the Jewish community and highly regarded. Second, the paper published last year by Harpending, et al., discussed how Jews became so smart, and some of the recessive genes that correlate with Jewish intelligence. That paper did not seem to generate the hysteria that MacDonald’s publications have, but it does vindicate what MacDonald has asserted. They make assertions about his scholarship, including selecting only material that supports his bias, and yet most of his data is based on Jewish publications. When trashing an author, the Jews invariably claim that material was left out; too much material was not relevant, etc. It is a constant accusation that cannot be resolved because every book published has to select to some extent what is included and what must be left behind or the work would never be completed. I do know that in many books that I read, I will compare what MacDonald has written, and he is invariably vindicated. His work grows stronger as time goes on—remembering that culture does change. MacDonald shows how the Jews pushed for open immigration from about 1924 and leading to the 1965 immigration act, opening up the floodgates. Since then of course business and numerous other advocates for open immigration have come to support the program for various reasons other than the original intent of the Jews. The Jews lament how MacDonald’s works are finding a place on the neo-Nazis’ bookcases. That’s strange—I thought most neo-Nazis were mentally perverted illiterates! But his work is most assuredly finding its way into the elite’s bookcases, as the works are scholarly and easily defendable as solid science. Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, May 17, 2008 at 08:45 AM in Comments:2
Posted by Gregory on May 17, 2008, 01:20 PM | # Matt—thanks for posting more information on the trials of Dr. MacDonald. For readers interested in the techniques used in this “war”, listen to the radio shows of Peter Schaenk found at www.reasonradionetwork.com. His shows on 5/8/08 and 5/9/08 are particularly good. Peter delves deeply into the structure of what he calls the “war of perception”. Hoping it’s not considered tasteless here to plug such stuff. Thanks. 3
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 17, 2008, 03:30 PM | # It is a constant accusation that cannot be resolved I resolve it as a logical fallacy, essentially a claim that McDonald’s work is bad because it isn’t about something else; essentially, it’s bad because it’s about “the wrong subject.” Am I wrong? 4
Posted by Skeptikos Examiner on May 17, 2008, 04:56 PM | # I do neither trust nor like McDonald. Keyword controlled opposition! His claims on Jewish intellectual superiority are rather groundless and based on a very incomplete view of what intelligence really is. Taken out critical and abstract thinking Jews maybe rank at the top and the difference between females and males appears to be only tiny, but include critical and abstract thinking into the equation and things look quite differently. IQ” tests, since the Jew David Wechsler (“the beloved changer” - that’s the meaning of his name!) trowed out everything related to abstract and critical thinking in order to arrive at roughly gender and racial equality, do only measure raw intelligence at best, not the actual capacity to think. I call them “post-Wechsler tests”. Jews also have a better than average memory which makes them excel in the “education” we have today, the education they created, which is basically focused on memorizing huge amounts of, more often than not, not related information. When ever critical and abstract thinking are taking into account, European on average excel over Jews and males over females. Also he goes a long with a lot of Jewish myths, puts out many half truths, and by this combination of myths and half-truths often arrives at wrong conclusions. 5
Posted by Guessedworker on May 17, 2008, 06:34 PM | # Skeptikos Examiner, Those are very interesting observations, particularly about the test performance variability by inclusion of critical and abstract thinking. Can you point me to the arguments, pro and contra if possible, for the inclusion of these facilities in IQ testing? 6
Posted by Darren on May 17, 2008, 07:28 PM | # MacDonald is on our side, regardless of whether or not you want to “like” him or not. 7
Posted by 123 on May 18, 2008, 04:49 AM | # Skeptikos Examiner, excellent post, and it confirms my first hand experiences with jews at school, and explains the disconnect to their supposedly high IQ. Without thinking much and deep about it, my opinion had been, that the much touted high IQ of jews was one of their myths spread around due to their control of the media, thus your post makes a lot of sense to me. 8
Posted by Captainchaos on May 18, 2008, 12:19 PM | # Wasn’t Pinker one of the guys who stepped up to put the kibosh on Dr. James Watson? Typical jewish bigwig, racial nationalism for them but mongrelization for us. 9
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 18, 2008, 02:13 PM | # I for one am totally unimpressed with Pinker who long ago should’ve acknowledged the full range of race-reality but stubbornly refuses. It’s transparent dishonesty based on personal political and likely ethnic motivations. I have no respect for this man. Zero. 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 18, 2008, 02:18 PM | # This is, in essence, another Jared Diamond, Steven Rose, Richard Lewontin, Leon Kamin, Stephen Jay Gould, Ashley Montagu, and Franz Boaz. I think this is where I came in, guys — been there, seen that, am looking for something new from this academic bunch. (Fat chance we’ll get it ...) 11
Posted by DavidL on May 18, 2008, 08:02 PM | # Skeptikos and 123 Good thinking. “Jews also have a better than average memory which makes them excel in the “education” we have today, the education they created, which is basically focused on memorizing huge amounts of, more often than not, not related information.” Correct - if you Goyim play “our” game we’ll beat you most every time - it’s rigged in our favor “it confirms my first hand experiences with jews at school, and explains the disconnect to their supposedly high IQ.” Mine too. They’re brilliant middlemen - taking a “cut” for practically no effort expended - but original ideas…nada. Again, thanks for your comments. 12
Posted by j on May 19, 2008, 01:04 PM | # Prof. Macdonald writes that Jews are “hostile elites” in European societies, collectively working for the destruction of the same societies (he says) they basically rule. He collects anecdotes from 2000 years of anti-Jewish literature to build his case, and then he leads the reader to extract the operational conclusions. I am a Jew and have read his work. Coming from the bona-fide and capable scholar he is, I conclude that, intellectually, he is dishonest and evil. 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 19, 2008, 01:28 PM | # Here is commenter “j’s” own log entry on Prof. MacDonald. 14
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 19, 2008, 01:58 PM | # The discussion in the MacDonald thread at “j’s” blog, which is between “j” and another Jewish guy, is of course an instantiation of my comment here: they don’t see it, they ain’t gonna see it no matter what you way, you can’t do anything about that, so just forget it and don’t fret over it which would a pure waste of time and energy — yours. You have better things to devote your time and energy to — making money for example, as “j” I think said last time he visited, if memory serves. Don’t sweat the small stuff. That’s small stuff. The big stuff is what you do, not what they say. David ben Gurion once said, in response to Jewish Israeli critics in regard to something or other he was doing, something they feared would look bad in the eyes of “World Opinion”: “It makes no difference what the goys say, it only makes a difference what the Jews do!” We goys can surely apply that piece of profound wisdom in reverse. 15
Posted by 357 on May 19, 2008, 02:32 PM | # From “j’s” own log entry on Prof. MacDonald. He said: ” I for one know that no one of the hippy scene ever imagined the future as it developed.” What a load of bull-capital-S-with-a-hit! Anyone around at the time who was over the age of six knew very well that the hippy scene was leading the white-race’s culture right down the tubes. Everyone (including the most uneducated Negroes) could plainly see what was coming. Even the drugged out hippies themselves, consciously, or at least intuitively, knew they were flushing traditional Western values down the toilet. Most of them did it anyway in order to be seen as “hip.” They were willing dupes led into a self destructive mindset by the leftist malcontents. So who are you trying to fool, j? 16
Posted by torgrim on May 19, 2008, 04:00 PM | # From “j’s” web site; “The movement was therefore initiated and led by an elite, but it was not aimed at advancing the interests of the unionized middle class. Indeed, the New Left regarded the working class as…..(from Prof. MacDonald) “j”...“if I remember well, the word was *PIGS*, the movement, Prof. MacDonald, was anti-establishment, and union middle class was, at least then, establishment. Fat, well paid, secure, satisfied, *ESTABLISHMENT*.” Yes, the hippy-New Left-anarcho nut jobs hated the white working man. I too was around and working at this time. NO, not in some university, or bagel shop. I was one of those, as you say, “fat, well paid, secure, satisfied, establishment types”....this just tells me, that you are one, or come from one, of the elite, that have no comprehension of what the white male worker is about. You sound like one of those that shouted, PIG..! Rubin, Hoffman, SDS, all of it was sick, it was a cancer on the body politic of my Nation! They shouted, ........ 17
Posted by vo on May 19, 2008, 04:02 PM | # http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/17/AR2008051702474_pf.html This article on an immigration raid at a beef factory in the midwest U.S. is interesting. The company is the nation’s largest supplier of kosher beef. Aaron Rubashkin apparently runs a company with horrible business ethics, as well as disregard for environmental standards and child labor laws. The story will probably go ignored, aside from being a footnote in the immigration debate. To echo Fred’s attitude toward the ____, any criticism will be squashed and redirected to another aspect. I commented re: the kosher beef story on our locally ___ controlled news blog yesterday - it got no response -, but today there are no less than 5 lengthy diatribes on recent evilness being exhibited by American Christians. 18
Posted by James Bowery on May 19, 2008, 06:07 PM | # Paraphrasing my response to the blog run by “j”—a response that has not yet appeared for some reason: It is pretty hard to deny that Jews are parasites when virtually all of the proposals for separation come from non-Jews. How much territory per capita would you “betters” be willing to cede to what the Founders of the US called “our posterity” in the Preamble to their Constitution? 19
Posted by melba peachtoast on May 19, 2008, 08:02 PM | #
Freddy, your opinion of him would not improve any if you saw how he dresses. Unless he’s improved recently. 20
Posted by Chestertonian on May 19, 2008, 09:15 PM | # As a group, Jews are incapable of accepting responsibility for their actions. They seek power without culpability. They yearn to rule over others, yet despise those they would govern. They are incapable of putting themselves in other peoples shoes, and conversely, expect others to have empathy for them. They are sore losers and self pitying. They are sore winners and self aggrandizing. They are misers, yet squanders of the inheritance of nations. They have no sense of aesthetics. They are small minded and leave no great monuments. Their literature consists of curses of other peoples, criticisms of other’s cultures, and jealous bigotry of differing religions. They slander, defame, and antagonize as a child would for attention. They fight without honor, lose without grace, and plead without dignity. They live in fear, and fill the world with their ugly paranoia. They are a twisted people who’s fitting punishment would be to live and compete among other antisocial peoples (i.e. Gypsys, low-IQ inmates, etc). Jews have nothing in common with the Western mindset. The sooner they go, the sooner we live. 21
Posted by Fr. John on May 19, 2008, 09:21 PM | # “He collects anecdotes from 2000 years of anti-Jewish literature to build his case, and then he leads the reader to extract the operational conclusions.”
For example: Blood Libel. Jews have denied it, until the son of the Chief Rabbi in Italy published THE definitive book that clearly states it DID happen! Then, the Jews backpeddle and take it off the presses. But an English translation is there, and has already been downloaded to thousands of computers, to REFUTE such slander (for all time!) of an honest academic, and to heap hot coals on your head for your dissembling and duplicitousness, ‘j’. [http://www.bloodpassover.com/] The Church was correct, and real Hierarchs (before the Vatican II Council capitulated to the Deicides) have only corroborated this, and other valid criticisms of the evil that is Jewry. [i.e. Sergein Nilus, and the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -http://www.roca.org/OA/89/89g.htm] And even when Jewish journalists can twist history to their whim, and make a holy man such as Nilus no more than a lecher, (while they have Sarah Silverstein!) yet still the ‘truth’ is still ‘out there.’ Very much the same as, oh, like, say, Wilkomirski’s fraudulent ‘memoir,’ “Fragments”? But still, the jews had the audacity to state that ‘it must be true, for it resonated with them.’ “A Count du Chayla testified that the Protocols were originally written in poor French, that Sergei Nilus seemed to doubt their authenticity but remarked: “What of it? Christ said wisdom came from an ass; why cannot truth come from a forgery?” [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,748094-3,00.html]
Pot calling kettle, come in kettle. Until and unless they acknowledge that they KILLED God, ‘his blood be on us and on our children,’ is still the ‘watchword of OUR faith.’ Sh’ma! End of story. 22
Posted by Darren on May 20, 2008, 01:41 AM | # Prof. Macdonald writes that Jews are “hostile elites” in European societies, collectively working for the destruction of the same societies (he says) How else do you frame the fact that Jews are, as a group, undermining the demographic integrity of white nations? He collects anecdotes from 2000 years of anti-Jewish literature to build his case No, he collects facts from a diverse array of factual - and often times Jewish - sources. I am a Jew and have read his work. Coming from the bona-fide and capable scholar he is, I conclude that, intellectually, he is dishonest and evil. On one hand, you accuse MacDonald of picking from anti-Jewish literature, but on the other you say he’s a bona fide scholar. Which is it? 23
Posted by the Narrator... on May 20, 2008, 10:44 AM | # At the end of the article MacDonald states, ‘White people have legitimate ethnic interests. To the extent that that is all they believe, then we are on the same page…I don’t like to use words like white supremacists. You could say that Koreans in Korea are Korean supremacists if they want to maintain their culture. It is kind of a loaded word; it is a politically charged word of the left, basically, to pathologize any sense of having an ethnicity and culture by people like me. I reject that….to the extent that David Duke is trying to advance a white ethnic interest and so on, I don’t have any problem with that.’ This is a respectable and rather bold statement for a Professor, who is already under attack, to make in the JEWISH JOURNAL of all places. 24
Posted by j on May 20, 2008, 11:23 AM | # Darren, Prof. Macdonald has a legitimate Ph.D. and publications, and his credentials are not in dispute. I come from math and engineering, so his methodology based anecdotes seems suspect to me, but then, this critique is not mine nor personal, but is shared by many numbers people regarding contemporary American social science. Answering your comment, since Macdonald uses the methodology of his academic branch, he must be considered a bona-fide academic scholar. However, that is not much, since American universities are chock-full of academic branches (such as alternative medicine, Chinese medicine, psychoanalysis, even astrology, black studies, gender studies, etc.) which are not, in my view, science. I find some of Prof. Macdonald’s insights valuable, like his explanation what Fr.John wants to express saying of people living today “They Killed God”. Other insights are weak and obviously false, like American Jews causing the flood of Third World immigration in the United States. We can start saying that the same phenomenon is happening in places where American Jews have no influence at all, like say Switzerland (about 1/3 foreign born), Spain, Australia, South Africa (millions of illegal immigrants from other, more miserable, African “countries”), Saudi Arabia, you name it. On the contrary, the efforts by Jewish organizations to open up the USA to Jewish immigration (who cares about the rest?) was a tragic failure, an absolute failure, and when open borders were needed, USA’s borders were hermetically sealed and thousands of Jewish refugees were sent back to be killed in Germany. Moreover, America did influence American colonies (in Latin America for example) to close their own borders to Jewish refugees. MacDonald magically transforms this terrible defeat in ... a powerful conspiration to destroy America. Another weak insight is his analysis of the Gomulka period in Poland. Jews were very much opressed and discriminated against during the thousand years of Polish history. Not once Jews attained any political power, on the contrary, they were absolutely powerless and barely “tolerated”. Only once, in a short period under Soviet occupation, did a group of apostate Communist ethnic Jews attain political power in Poland. This short period, of about eight years, ended disastrously to the members of this group (they ended in jail or in exile), and then, it also caused the end of one thousand years of Jewish presence in Poland. The jewish community was basically expelled and Poland became Judenfrei. It was, in my eyes, a passing episode, but extreemely disastrous for Polish Jewry. Once agains, Prof. Macdonald’s magical mind transforms this short and failed phenomenon into an emblematic conspiracy of those powerful Jews. therefore I feel Prof. Macdonald is an antisemite which means that he is not objective nor scientific, and has no place in legitimate academic debate. 25
Posted by the Narrator... on May 20, 2008, 12:47 PM | # We can start saying that the same phenomenon is happening in places where American Jews have no influence at all, like say Switzerland (about 1/3 foreign born), Spain, Australia, South Africa (millions of illegal immigrants from other, more miserable, African “countries”), Saudi Arabia, you name it. So there are no Jews in Europe? Also the extent of American Jewish influence is rather significant across the globe.
And it was a Jew, Emma Lazarus, who gave us the “Give us your wretched refuse” diatribe, and it was a Jew, Israel Zangwill, who introduced the phrase “Melting Pot” into the American vocabulary. As for Jews being restricted in immigration numbers during WWII, that is thanks to the efforts of Racialists who pushed for the 1924 Immigration Act, which was vehemently opposed by Jews, who, in the person of Emmanuel Celler, overthrew it in 1965 leading to the flooding of America from the Third World. Yes Whites cooperated with them, but the percentage of Jewish involvement in every anti-Western, anti-American movement, speaks volumes for a group who makes up no more than 2% of our population. Kevin MacDonald’s research on this subject is rather good. Chapter 7 from his book, ‘Culture of Critique’ entitled ‘Jewish Involvement In Shaping US Immigration Policy’ can be seen in full at his website. Is Prof. MacDonald anti-semitic? 26
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 12:59 PM | # I just googled him, Melba, and didn’t see anything too terrible — there was this, for example, at what appears to be a “Stuff White People Like” convention http://www.hbes.com/Hbes/photos.05/photos-05.htm and there were other photos of him in ordinary jackets and ties but nothing outrageous that I saw. Have you got a link? (Here’s the web-site for those convention attendees by the way — their group is called “Stuff White People Like,” and they all look, act, think, and dress the same: 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 01:13 PM | # I won’t be replying to j by the way, who seems to be in the Jewish “just brazenly deny the obvious” mode, and replying to them when they’re in that mode is a time-waster if ever there was one: they’ll argue two-plus-two, they’ll argue the sun will rise tomorrow, they’ll argue water is wet. He’s read MacDonald who explains it better than anyone in this thread can: if that doesn’t suffice nothing will because either he’s determined not to open his eyes or he lacks certain synapses. Seems like a nice guy though. 28
Posted by James Bowery on May 20, 2008, 01:14 PM | # Virtually all of the immigration flood into various, primarily Euroman, territories has occurred after the Post-WW II rise of US’s world influence, and after the US’s 1965 passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act, opening US territory to occupation by exploding world populations. Moreover, the stated intent by Jews in supporting this act was to render the US so multicultural that it would be incapable of an ethnically-based political movement like that seen in National Socialist Germany. Such paranoia invites the realization of its own fears. We want our territory, that you politically hijacked and then “hocked” for your own purposes, back. 29
Posted by Darren on May 20, 2008, 02:07 PM | # I come from math and engineering, so his methodology based anecdotes seems suspect to me, but then, this critique is not mine nor personal, but is shared by many numbers people regarding contemporary American social scienc Be specific. Nobody cares about your academic credentials. Substantiate your argument. Other insights are weak and obviously false, like American Jews causing the flood of Third World immigration in the United States. This isn’t MacDonald’s argument. MacDonald argues that Jews have influenced society through their network of interest groups and manipulation of public opinion to cause support for such policies. He does not claim that Jews clandestinely overthrew the government and will of the people. Indeed, MacDonald has a book looking at the historical nature of anti-Semitism looking at the periods of time where Jews were either in favor or out of favor and how they gained power while they were in favor, and vice verse. Anyway, are you trying to deny the role of prominent Jewish congressmen and well-documented role of Jewish ethnic lobbying groups who wanted to open the borders to non-Whites because they feared rising anti-Semitism if the demographic proportion of Whites were not reduced? You may not believe this argument, but it is a fact that is stated by many Jews. This is a good place to start: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/ReplyHistory-2.htm You can’t accuse MacDonald of cherry-picking from anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish sources because, well, the sources were often from Jews themselves! We can start saying that the same phenomenon is happening in places where American Jews have no influence at all, like say Switzerland (about 1/3 foreign born) You mean to say that American foreign policy has absolutely no effect in Europe, or that European Jewry has no influence on Swiss politics? LMAO! On the contrary, Europeans resent American cultural imperialism and the presence of Jews in the European political elite is rather well known (except to you). On the contrary, the efforts by Jewish organizations to open up the USA to Jewish immigration (who cares about the rest?) was a tragic failure Indeed, it was not until after WWII ended were Jewish groups able to use their holocaust fantasy stories upon the masses to gain emotional support for the opening of floodgates to more Jews (consequently opening the floodgates for Jewish Bolsheviks too) and other non-Whites. World War II was a giant “good vs. evil” marketing ploy that, in the end, put an end to ethnonationalist movements and allowed Jews to flourish on this basis. Moreover, America did influence American colonies (in Latin America for example) to close their own borders to Jewish refugees. MacDonald magically transforms this terrible defeat in ... a powerful conspiration to destroy America. Please cite where he does such a thing. I feel Prof. Macdonald is an antisemite Anyone who does not have glowing feelings for all Jews is an anti-Semite, right? We have a word for people like you: loxists. Look, I don’t hate Jews and I don’t even have any ill will towards them. However, the facts about ethnic interests are what they are. We all struggle for power and implement different strategies to achieve it. It boggles me that Jews will organize themselves in the way they do and support the policies they do and then go out and try to deny the very things they are doing as a group. which means that he is not objective nor scientific, and has no place in legitimate academic debate Anyone who criticizes Jews has no academic legitimacy to you? But its OK to bash gentile whites like your brothers in the Frankfurt School are doing right? You just called him a bona fide scholar and now you say he isn’t. Which is it J? You keep contradicting yourself! 30
Posted by Darren on May 20, 2008, 02:27 PM | # There are two methodologies at play in Kevin MacDonald’s research. First, in historical research, he does what everyone else does: he researches a wide body of historical sources and generates a claim that can be attributed back to the works he has studied. The only way you can attack him on this basis is to (1) attack the things he has referenced for being inaccurate, biased, incorrect, etc. (you accused him of only going to sources biased against Jews, which is patently false) or (2) find a better body of evidence that contradicts what he has used (which I doubt you can nor have you even tried), leaving it up to objective analysis of people to interpret which one is more honest In his role as an evolutionary psychologist, the research tends to be more observational. Can we take average of the Jewish population and compare it to the average of the white Gentile population and determine any behavioral differences? If we note that, throughout history, that whites have had a strain of individualism whereas Jews, being a people with significant genetic contribution from the East are more collective and ethnocentric, can we correlate those observations to behaviors today? I realize that the research here is a bit more subjectively interpreted, however, would it be beyond the pale to suggest that Jews may very well be hyperethnocentric as MacDonald claims? 31
Posted by Darren on May 20, 2008, 02:34 PM | # I also want to know how that, in light of even a quick examination of both the ADL and SPLC’s websites, one cannot come to the conclusion that two of our most prominent Jewish ethnic interest groups cannot possibly be working to undermine the traditional healthy values of European America and aren’t actively supporting race-dilution policies via immigration policies, multiculturalism, miscegenation propaganda, and such. I really want you to just tell that to me with a straight face, J. Oh I don’t just blame the Jews for this, but the facts are that Jews were the ones out there instigating the attacks on White America and promoting the neo-bolshevik policies of racial integration and third world immigration in such a total disproportion. 32
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 20, 2008, 04:06 PM | # We can start saying that the same phenomenon is happening in places where American Jews have no influence at all, like say Switzerland (about 1/3 foreign born), Spain, Australia, South Africa (millions of illegal immigrants from other, more miserable, African “countries”), Saudi Arabia, you name it.j (Paraphrasing from memory): Colonel Sanders: “Don’t you have the Schwartz, too?” Dark Helmet: Nah, he got the upside, I got the downside. See, there’s two sides to every Schwartz… You got the downside, eh j? I mean really, this passes for logic in your world? I wonder if that would work at a murder trial. “Your honor, it’s obvious that I didn’t kill Mr. Croaked - someone was just murdered two towns over in Springfield and I was in court at the time!” MacDonald magically transforms this terrible defeat in ... a powerful conspiration to destroy America. That’s a lie. You might want to stick to “arguing” with people who haven’t read MacDonald’s work. (Conspiration? The very downside I guess!) Another weak insight is his analysis of the Gomulka period in Poland. Jews were very much opressed and discriminated against during the thousand years of Polish history. Not once Jews attained any political power, on the contrary, they were absolutely powerless and barely “tolerated”. If this is so, please show us the scholars who have taken MacDonald to task and made it stick. I.e., present MacDonald’s counterarguments. If you just criticize or quote criticism, and then we dig up where MacDonald has replied effectively (which is always the case in my experience), you’re just going to look like everyone else we’ve read on the subject with a jewish dog in the fight. Only once, in a short period under Soviet occupation, did a group of apostate Communist ethnic Jews attain political power in Poland. I love this lying, sneaky, underhanded, typically dishonest Jewish argument (is all of that redundant?); they weren’t really Jews! That is your implication, right? Otherwise it’d be “jews,” not “a group of apostate Communist ethnic Jews.” Yes? Why are the “good” jews just “jews,” but the “bad” jews are always “not representative not-really-jewish, jewish-in-name-only, disavowed-by-jews-everywhere jews?” Do whites get to do this too? Disown all whites, past and present, who don’t serve our purposes? This short period, of about eight years, ended disastrously to the members of this group (they ended in jail or in exile), and then, it also caused the end of one thousand years of Jewish presence in Poland. I find it hard to believe that the Soviet Union was so very, very awful for jews, when the fall of the Iron Curtain unleashed the “Russian” oligarchs onto the world…and they all turned out to be jews. Something just doesn’t add up there. Once agains, Prof. Macdonald’s magical mind transforms this short and failed phenomenon into an emblematic conspiracy of those powerful Jews. Really? Cite a passage, please. therefore I feel Prof. Macdonald is an antisemite which means that he is not objective nor scientific, and has no place in legitimate academic debate. Lol. One need not be objective to present good science, or make effective arguments. The suggestion one does is ridiculous. Who’s objective? Show me Dr. Objective, please. Tell me, with all jewry has to lose should MacDonald’s arguments become widely read and accepted, and all the brain power at her disposal, why hasn’t she responded in kind? Where are the teams of jewish brainiacs eviscerating his research? There’d be no need to draw much attention; just quietly publish a rigorous destruction of his work. Yet all the king’s horses and all the king’s men have yet to put Humpty together again. Why? 33
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 20, 2008, 04:14 PM | # Well I’ll be hornswoggled! Conspiration is a word! My mistake. Learn something new every day… 34
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 20, 2008, 04:20 PM | # On the thousand years of jewish servitude in Poland: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=poland+jewish+bailiffs&btnG=Search 35
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 04:41 PM | # J, what’s better for Eurosphere countries, relative Euro racial homogeneity and Euro racial predominance (along with one of the Euro national cultures for each country) or the Jewish ideal for Eurosphere nations, the set-up 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of Jews with any power or influence strongly prefer, namely government-enforced majority demographic status for non-whites? 36
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 04:43 PM | # J, which do you prefer for the U.S., the 1924 law or the 1965 law? (You used to be an American, right? Answer as if you still were.) 37
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 04:57 PM | # If J answers my second question you’re going to see him prefer the 1965 law or hem-and-haw so much, attempting to obfuscate so much, you won’t be able to say which one he prefers (which will mean, of course, he prefers the 1965 law). Not in a million years will a Jew, with something like half-a-dozen excpetions worldwide, come out against the “It’s Soooooooooooooo Good for the Jews!” 1965 Guaranteed-Slow-Genocide-of-Euros Celler-Hart-Kennedy Finally-A-Little-Jewish-Pay-Back Immigration Be-Done-With-Those-Euro-Goys-Forever Law. 38
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 05:21 PM | # Yesterday I read an entry in one of the French blogs about a group in France that’s hit upon the realization that race-replacement of the French might not penetrate as deeply if only the cities are race-replaced, so to really get rid of the idea that “whatever happens to the cities, Frenchmen in the countryside are still white,” North-African mulattoes and Sub-Saharans have to be resettled no longer exclusively in the cities but more and more in the rural towns and villages as well. This group say that, so far, the program is off to a very good start: they’re getting a lot of mulattoes settled in France’s rural areas. Today’s quiz: The name of that group’s advisor, as it appears in the log entry, is (choose one) what-sounding? ___ Catholic-sounding ___ Protestant-sounding ___ Greek Orthodox-sounding ___ Shinto-sounding ___ Ba-hai-sounding ___ Mormon-sounding ___ Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints Seventh-Day Adventist Christ-Scientist-sounding (did I get that one right? I always get some of these names mixed up) ___ The one everyone’s afraid to put because even to mention it gets you prosecuted for hate-speech and next thing you know you have Abe Foxman on your neck-sounding (I’ll post the group’s advisor’s name later, and Prof. MacDonald has kindly agreed to donate a personally autographed leather-bound, gilt-edged set of his complete works to J if he turns out to be the winner!) 39
Posted by Bo on May 20, 2008, 05:24 PM | # “j” says on 5/20/08 at 3:23 PM, “Prof. Macdonald is an antisemite which means that he is not objective nor scientific, and has no place in legitimate academic debate.” But the label “anti-Semite” has already been analyzed and found to be a defamatory label. Here is the definition of “anti-Semite” from our list of slurs: “Anti-Semite - A claim to supremacy over diverse white Americans by claiming a right to name and label them; an expression of contempt akin to that shown by shiksa, shabbas goy, goyim, and gentile; an attempt to smother white American diversity and nationality. [Anti-Jewish activities can obviously take place, but labeling a person with this name is over the line. It is like saying an alien present in the US without papers is an ‘illegal alien.’] “ Conclusion: “j” is a supremacist by claiming the right to name the other, he shows contempt, and he wants to smother our diversity and nationality. His arguments have no validity given the hateful state of his mind and heart. 40
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 05:32 PM | # As good a piece of proof as any is if the log entry’s title were “Jews Permitting Debate” it would set a record for internet hits in no time flat, as everyone descended on it to devour it in disbelief and hope against hope. “Jews Shutting Down Debate” probably elicits a ho-hum from everyone: “Oh is that all? Call us when something new happens.” 41
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 20, 2008, 05:42 PM | # J’s quite the fast and loose player with the truth. I won’t even bother going into his post. But, one comment violated one of my myriad pet peeves: Jews are prominent everywhere they live Jews are not prominent amongst those seeking to preserve and promote European Ethnic Genetic Interests. There’s prominent, and then there’s prominent. They’re not prominent in paleoconservatism. They’re not prominent in anti-Zionism. They’re not prominent in proxies for European Ethnic Genetic Interests (fighting Affirmative Action, fighting the anti-freedom “anti-discrimination” laws, fighting mass 3rd world immigration, fighting the ethnic cleansing of European populations throughout the world, etc.). In practical terms, the only political arenas in which Jews are prominent are those which harm me and my Ethnic Genetic Interests at worst, or are neutral to same at best. 42
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 05:55 PM | # Excellent point in that last comment by Svy. Diaspora Jews are extremely prominent in nation-destruction and not only totally absent from nation-destruction-reversal, they fight tooth-and-nail to ensure that those trying to reverse Jewish-wrought nation-destruction (trying to reverse open borders, for example) fail. 43
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 06:08 PM | # Jews like J act like they’re wearing a special kind of glasses that block out bad things Jews do, or make it impossible to see when they do them as Jews, not merely as generic liberals/leftists. You put these glasses on, you don’t see any bad stuff that Jews do — it just doesn’t register. You’re blind to it. You could mistake the Jews for the Amish in fact, they seem so apolitical and innocent. “Wow, with these glasses on the Jews look just like the Amish! I can’t tell them apart! Amazing!” (They’re called ©Jew-blockers™, available through the morning-time-slot TV infomercials!) 44
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 20, 2008, 06:18 PM | # Ah, an Israeli. That makes it easier, doesn’t it guys? J, we just want for ourselves what you jews have for yourselves in Israel. ‘Nuff said. (P.S., please take off your jew-colored glasses and look at yourself from our perspective. Do this for about five years, or ten if you don’t have much free time. Then get back to us. The Jewish refusal to even attempt to see yourselves through others’ eyes is unbecoming in grown men) 45
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 06:58 PM | # Inverted World, http://inverted-world.com/ , may be the site for you, J — the same things get them hopping mad as do us, with this difference, that they steadfastly refuse to apportion a greater share of blame to the Jews than to others — here’s their take on MacDonald for example: http://inverted-world.com/index.php/articles/articles/did_the_jews_do_it/ (plus I think their web-stats are a little anemic lately, so they might appreciate the business … tell ‘em I sent ya) 46
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 20, 2008, 07:20 PM | # OK OK OK MacDonald was wrong, the Jews didn’t play the role he claims in giving us that gift that keeps on giving, the 1965 “It’s Good for the Jews” “It’s Great for the Euros, Really Just Incredibly Fantastic for Them!” Immigration bill. OK forget that. Who’s the biggest obstacle right now — right now — to getting that horror undone and the equivalent of the 1924 set-up restored? (I’ve just learned that Prof. MacDonald will kindly donate a second gold-embossed leather-bound set of his complete works together with signed copies of selected works by Prof. Virginia Abernethy, Prof. J. Philippe Rushton, and Prof. Linda Gottfredson to be awarded to the winner! All entries due in by next Cinco de Mayo; employees of www.MajorityRights.com and their families are not eligible; the first-prize winner will be announced over the internet at this web-site.) 47
Posted by 357 on May 20, 2008, 07:36 PM | # I don’t for one second beleive the Jews are blind to the harm they’ve done or are doing to white nations; however, can we blame the Jews for the gross naivete of whites as evidenced by this? :- 48
Posted by anonymous on May 20, 2008, 09:46 PM | # This is just the way many Jews/ADL/etc…. acted when Mel Gibson’s film was released, shit, even before it was released. They were upset because the film used actual lines from the Gospels regarding Jewish guilt for the murder of Christ, among other things. There were fears of pogroms, anti-semitic attacks and other bullshit. Mnay people did in fact have an emotional reaction, but it was reaffirming their Christianity if anything. Freedom of speech and all that except if some or any Jews at all, even some who lived 200 years ago, are criticized. Meanwhile Jews want to import people who are not only hostile to regualr whites and the West, but actually hate Jews. Go fidgure. They bitch about a movie and a university professor, yet fail to remember Crown Heights. Maybe some skinheads were orchestrating that whole affair. Cross them and they’ll try and ruin you. They did go after Mel Gibson. 49
Posted by Gregory on May 20, 2008, 11:57 PM | # —- and now for a tasty channel-change to some GOOD news, and it’s happing sans (fill in the blank)s. Mamma Mia, Pass the Linguini The way to a country’s soul is through its stomach. And European nations (there are still such things, for a while) are fed up to here with having multi-culti menus shoved on their children at school. That nasty rule of the p.c. world is about to have its table turned over - napkins, falafel, and all - by the new government in Italy: Ethnic food may be removed from government schools in the Italian capital, Rome, in the latest gesture by the city’s new centre-right government to target multiculturalism. Laura Marsilio, city councillor for schools in Rome, said the local government would re-evaluate the ethnic menus of public schools, and replace it with what she called “Italian regional dishes as well as typical Mediterranean cuisine.” Marsilio spoke to the media on Monday and said that the ‘ethnic menus’, introduced by the previous centre-left government of Romano Prodi “gave insufficient results.” Marsilio reportedly also plans to look at centres where parents of immigrant children and their relatives are taught Italian, the laws of the country and computer classes. “We need to see if they are really effective for integration,” Marsilio said. The councillor also plans to ensure laws are respected with regards to the number of Italian and immigrant children in schools, because in some cases, immigrant children outnumber Italian children. The 40-year-old Marsilio is a member of the post-fascist National Alliance party, a member of prime minister Silvio Berlusconi’s conservative coalition. However, that’s not the only heresy being committed by the Italian government: “They have to learn to respect the rules. They steal and mistreat minors, I don’t like them. Not because I am racist, but because they don’t obey the rules,” said Marsilio. Now there’s a new meme for you: dislike based upon a culture of law-breaking. How novel after so many years of 1984 silence. Theodore Dalrymple would approve, but the multi-cults must be gnashing their teeth in the outer (and unelected ) darkness. 50
Posted by EA (European American) Steve on May 21, 2008, 01:45 AM | # In response to J: I see Jews as one of us; we are White Caucasians. (for clarification, Arabs are not; some Iraqis, some Iranians, and even some Turks are border-line). There is a genetic distance between Jews and most Europeans, but there is a very close proximity. Technically, it could probably be argued either way, whether the Jews are the same as the Europeans. However, the same eyes that make me sexually and genetically (through miscegenation) repulsed by non-Whites, have open arms for the Jews (as one of us). I wouldn’t want the Jews to absorb the White Gentile genepool, but I wouldn’t want France to absorb Slovakia, either. Biologically, I have no qualm with the Jews. Unfortunately, what many posters have claimed (even myself), is true: many establishment Jews are trying to exterminate White Gentiles. And they have disowned us, pro-White White Gentiles and Jews, through their actions. Also, multi-national corporations and even some White Gentiles are harming our race. It’s more about the individual than the group as a whole! I believe the anti-White Gentile Jews should be dealt with. Even though some Jews are leading our destruction, just as Ted Kennedy is (who claims to be the Irish version of these mentioned Jews!), I think it’s more of an economic/establishment matter. It’s not mostly about the Jews, even in general. But rather, it’s monopolists who want to control the World! Now, on to Dr. MacDonald, I don’t know enough about him to determine whether he is anti-Semitic or not (and I am pro-Jewish). However, I believe he is very intelligent, and I believe has provided great literature about non-Jewish related issues. I think (though am not certain) he provided a piece about “feminazis” manipulating the divorce system, to devastate White males, in America. 51
Posted by me on May 21, 2008, 01:48 AM | # I don’t get it…how come when jews do studies to support racist ummm i mean nationalist views all the sources are biased, but when you guys post it the sources are assumed to be fine? I mean I think both of them are wrong, but isn’t this a double standard? 52
Posted by me on May 21, 2008, 01:54 AM | # I love this lying, sneaky, underhanded, typically dishonest Jewish argument (is all of that redundant?); they weren’t really Jews! That is your implication, right? Otherwise it’d be “jews,” not “a group of apostate Communist ethnic Jews.” Yes? Why are the “good” jews just “jews,” but the “bad” jews are always “not representative not-really-jewish, jewish-in-name-only, disavowed-by-jews-everywhere jews?” Do whites get to do this too? Disown all whites, past and present, who don’t serve our purposes? more wonderful double standards. There are white jews. You can’t usually tell a jew from a gentile. Yet you disown them. You find any excuse to prove they are not white. 53
Posted by Lurker on May 21, 2008, 04:35 AM | # me - “You can’t usually tell a jew from a gentile.” Ah, maybe you can’t but you will find many people can and you know what - I’ll bet Jews know almost every single time. Now how could they do that or even want to do that, I mean we are all white arent we? 54
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 21, 2008, 08:03 AM | # “EA Steve,” you need to tighten up the quality of your posts. They ramble into incoherence. I’m sure mine have done it but yours seem to every time. Can you re-read them before posting, to tighten up the quality? As for your point above in regard to the exceptions: everyone is aware of those. Some cats have six toes and maybe some giraffes short necks but but we still say “giraffes have long necks” and “cats have five toes” and that’s OK to say. Everyone knows about Chaim ben Pesach and the other fine Americans of the Jewish Task Force (jtf.org), how they’re on our side on immigration and race-replacement and are the exact diametrical polar opposites of every other Jew any of us has ever dealt with, seen, or heard about in his life in regard to these matters. Their existence is absolutely amazing but they’re real, they’re out there, and they’re working as hard as they can to undo and reverse race-replacement of the U.S.‘s traditional Euro population. If all the Jews were like them it would be simple — I’d kick all the WASP élites out of the country and race-replace them, the whole lot of them, with the Jews. Unfortunately the reality is ... otherwise ... (But the present WASP élite criminals need to get get kicked out anyway of course.) My view is Jews and Euros would ideally live in separate countries because what one hates the other loves and vice-versa. Why live in the same country if that’s the case? Makes no sense and leads to lots of destruction, even wars and untold misery. Living in the same country as Euros, the Jews are perpetually using their money and brainpower to, among other things, force/brainwash/bribe the Euros into stopping doing what they, the Jews, hate, and since the Euros derive happiness from doing what the Jews hate (for the simple reason that what the Jews hate is Euros being normal — stuff like Euros celebrating Christmas communitywide, which the Jews can’t stand; not letting the seven billion non-white Third Worlders come flooding into your country and race-replace you, which the Jews love; not giving the Negroes and Mexicans the whip hand over the Euros, which the Jews love; not educating Euro schoolgirls and women to hate Euro men, which the Jews love because they covet the Euro women for themselves; and so on) Euros end up miserable and ruled over by a totalitarian Euro-hating Jewish hegemony and forced to put up with abnormal conditions which Jews love but are unpleasant and unhealthy in the extreme for Euros, and actually genocidal for them (race-replacement immigration; non-Euros being given the whip hand over Euros by government; girls and women being taught to loathe Euro men and to consider only Jewish or non-white men acceptable; and so on — everyone with internet access knows by this stage of the game that’s what’s going on, I don’t have to recite the litany). There’s plenty of land in North America to 1) give a big chunk back to the North American Red Man for his own country so he won’t go extinct as a race; 2) let the Quebeckers have their own separate country; 3) let the Jews have the Southern half of California for theirs (they broke it, they’ve bought it) and what the hell, throw in the southern half of Florida for them too: Jews are more of a tropical race than Euros; 4) reserve the rest for Euros exclusively: no Jews. I happen to like Jews and like living with them but not at the price of the Euro race being genocided by them, the price inevitably paid, sooner or later, by Euros who let lots of Jews settle among them. 55
Posted by Darren on May 21, 2008, 08:16 AM | # I don’t get it…how come when jews do studies to support racist ummm i mean nationalist views all the sources are biased, but when you guys post it the sources are assumed to be fine? I mean I think both of them are wrong, but isn’t this a double standard? Not all of us have a problem with Jewish ethnonationalism. My only problem is when we’re asked to fight and die for Israel and instigate wars in the middle east on their behalf. We don’t ask Jews to fight for our wars for us, why should we fight theirs? Remember this website has people of different viewpoints! Heck, we even let a left-leaning philo-Semite post oddball articles on the front page. more wonderful double standards. There are white jews. You can’t usually tell a jew from a gentile. Yet you disown them. You find any excuse to prove they are not white. Well, it depends. Ashkenazi Jews are an interesting bunch, often times with a significant dose of white DNA. However, more often than not, its easy to pick out a Jew. Jews are a mixture of several racial groups, too. What is definitely true, however, is that Jews are a separate ethnicity, for they have largely kept themselves in genetic isolation and (perhaps until recently, where its starting to break down) tried to keep from intermarrying. To EA: Also, multi-national corporations and even some White Gentiles are harming our race. It’s more about the individual than the group as a whole! Well, to blame every Jew is not fair, but you are explicitly denying the role of Jewish ethnic activist groups as well as groups of individual Jews who share the same ideology who act out in ways that are benefical for Jews as a whole but harmful to us. Its not just one or two bad Jews in high places ruining the name of all of them, its large numbers of them who share the same ideologies. Its good for them and they know it. I don’t really think its some sort of conspiratorial plot to attack Whites, its just an example of hyperethnocentrism; Jews acting out for mutual benefit by supporting policies that will bring them prosperity and safety. Now, on to Dr. MacDonald, I don’t know enough about him to determine whether he is anti-Semitic or not The problem with the phrase “anti-Semitic” is that it is generally a tool used to shut down debate. Its never “anti-Goyish” to talk about white skin privilege or other things like that (such sociological topics that are popular among Jewish professors of sociology). But, providing documentable facts about Jewish group behavior is to many people. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. I don’t hate Jews nor do I wish them any harm, so I shy away from calling myself an anti-Semite, but at the same time, I believe there are some significant cultural differences that would forever keep ourselves in conflict and/or result in harm to one or the other. 56
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 21, 2008, 08:44 AM | # Does the fact that the Jews manage to drive the Euros to sickness, misery, and finally extinction every time they settle among them in large numbers mean we’re seeing the Darwinian survival of the fittest, the Euros deserving to go extinct and the Jews come out on top? No, we’re seeing the same thing you’re seeing with the Japanese beetle accidentally introduced from Japan to the U.S. and inflicting much damage here unlike over there in its native environment where it’s insignificant as a pest and kept under control by its own native ecology, predators, and so on; or the zebra mussel invasion in the Great Lakes, taking over the place, clogging industrial intake pipes, and so on; or that plant that got introduced into South Florida, I forget the name, some kind of tree or shrub introduced from Australia, and now is taking over, crowding out the native plants which it didn’t do in its native habitat because of the balance of ecological forces there which don’t exist in South Florida; or the duckweed I think it’s called, doing similar things; or the European rabbit that got introduced into Australia and is now running wild, exploding in population and causing lots of habitat destruction and crowding out of local species because the forces that kept it in check where it came from aren’t present the same way in Australia: the Jews are an example of that, a species that’s gotten out of its native environment where it was held in check by certain forces native to that ecology (that ecology being the Arab/Semitic world of Western Asia, also known as the Near- and Middle-East), and into an alien one (Europe) where those specific forces are absent and it’s able to gain advantage more easily than ever it could back home. Euros don’t think or act the same way Jews do so Jews can pull all kinds of crap on them which they weren’t expecting and don’t know how to counter till it’s too late and they’ve already lost the upper hand. Jews don’t have such success when pitted against their racial cousins the Arab Semites because the two think alike and are natural ecological checks and balances on one another. The Jews are just another Semitic race in the Middle East, nothing special, like the zebra mussel back home wherever it originated: it’s nothing special. In Europe the Jews become like the zebra mussel in the Great Lakes: they take over. The counterbalancing checks and forces that acted on them and everyone else back home are suddenly gone and they run rampant in the new environment that has a different set of checks and balances that aren’t tuned to keeping them controled. 57
Posted by Fr. John on May 21, 2008, 09:57 AM | # “The [Jews] were upset because the film [Passion of Christ] used actual lines from the Gospels regarding Jewish guilt for the murder of Christ, among other things. There were fears of pogroms, anti-semitic attacks and other bullshit. Mnay people did in fact have an emotional reaction, but it was reaffirming their Christianity if anything. Freedom of speech and all that except if some or any Jews at all, even some who lived 200 years ago, are criticized. Meanwhile Jews want to import people who are not only hostile to regualr whites and the West, but actually hate Jews.” This is why I continue to post theological points to shore up the philosophical/‘scientific’; not because I am trying to ‘convert’ y’all. But because there is a point to be made when talking with/of/against the Deicides. The Jew- whether atheist, marxist, sodomite, or just plain obnoxious ethnic interloper, ALL operate on a framework derived from the Talmud. They themselves have said it, time and time and time again. This means that, even when they are most in a river in Egypt (De Nial) about their religious identity, they STILL are operating from a RELIGIOUS framework- even the most atheist among them. While I allow Whites the option to turn their back on the religion that sprang up, was formed, and guided European civilization until recently (say, the last 150 years or so in Europe, and the last 75 in the USA) - i.e, Christianity; (though I wonder, ‘in my artless japanese fashion,’ why…) I want all White men (and women) to know that Jews - as JEWS- as ‘sons of the covenant’ (oops, see, there’s that ‘religious framework’ again!) ALL operate on a THEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK, even when they deny it. As Gary North said, “There is no such thing as neutrality.” That it (this Framework of the Jews) is not valid, true, Biblical, or especially God-pleasing, is beside the point. THEY STILL OPERATE FROM IT. This is also why they are so clearly, (as a race, and as an ethnos) so totally SCHIZOPHRENIC. As Dr. MacDonald has pointed out, their ability to get around what ‘is’ is, (remember Clinton’s legal team?) comes from centuries of analyzing the conflicting and often contradictory ‘commentary’ of the TALMUD. They [Jews] want to be “Somebody’s ‘Chosen People,’” (but it certainly ain’t YHWH God’s!), while at the same time denying that YHWH God (or His Son, Jesus Christ) have any rule or authority over them!!! Thus, “J” put in quotes (to minimize and offset from his person) the fact that the Jews have historically been called ‘Deicides’ or ‘God-killers.’ The recent denial of that moniker (by the late traitor Pope, J2P2) still does not remove the anathema that was freely chosen by them. The TALMUD (the operating methodology of them all) has the most blasphemous things to state AGAINST the Messiah (I choose my words to infuriate the maximum, those who ‘say they are Jews, and are not.’) [Rev. 2:8,9] for their hatred of YHWH God, and His Son, Jesus Christ, is THAT GREAT. It does not matter if YOU, (as white Europeans) don’t believe the Christian Story. THE JEWS DO, and that’s what drives them crazy! This is the greatest antidote to the poison of Judaism, Talmudism, Bolshevism, and Zionism… the Authentic, ‘Chosen-People’ denying faith of historic Christendom! (That the Jews have sought, above all, to infiltrate, and dilute this teaching, both in protestant and Catholic camps, is proof of my thesis) You are correct, all of you, when you say that you cannot argue with ‘one of them.’ They are like eels in the water, ready to slip out of your philosophical grasp, and then, when you finally ‘get them in a corner’ will turn and bite you with poison in their fangs. the Church long ago was correct in refusing them seats in government, finance, commerce, universities, etc. It’s time we began the restoration of that ‘beyond the pale’ scenario again, and speedily. Even if it means adopting Christendom as our model once again. 58
Posted by 357 on May 21, 2008, 10:03 AM | # We as whites should ‘hate’ anyone or any group that is intentionally working towards eradicating the white-race’s genotype. To hate the very people that are out to eliminate the genetic posterity of our kith and kin epitomizes NORMALITY. To aid and abet the people that are engaged in policies intended to wipe your own race off the planet is perversion in its most degenerate form. A major problem we whites must overcome is: too many whites care more about other races’ well being than their own. This self defeating mindset is going to be VERY hard to change. Whites, in general, are consumed by a guilt complex that is reinforced with an almost impregnable ignorance. Every other race detects our fatal weakness, and they sure take full advantage of it. Bottom line, we have our work cut out for us. 59
Posted by Rusty Mason on May 21, 2008, 02:22 PM | # I think it’s helpful when sorting friends and foes to remember that in some languages there are two separate words for “enemy.” In Latin, for example, a personal enemy is an Inimicus and an enemy of a people, state,nation, or tribe is a Hostes, and that usually in the plural. Jesus admonished us to love our Inimicus, not the Hostes (that would be insane/JewDayO!Christian). I think confusion is introduced during English discussions of the JQ and similar because English speakers commonly only use one word for enemy. I propose a simple solution to this problem: that we all communicate in Latin. Sententia magna, nonne? 60
Posted by Old Guy on May 21, 2008, 02:44 PM | # Fred & 357— you guys have both hit on essential things regarding the “conflict”, at least at this stage of my thinking on the topics. Fred has isolated the idea that it’s the CONTEXT in which incompatible things are placed that’s at least as important as the “nature” of each thing. By putting incompatibles into a common bio-cultural “space”, bad stuff is inevitable, for both “sides”. The activity of “getting on in the world” of each (their original “nature”?) messes stuff up for the other, as subjectively viewed/understood by each. The problem is ... and MacDonald has made this quite clear: it’s sometimes to the ADVANTAGE of one group to evolve a group strategy of “getting on in the world” which leverages their strengths to take advantage of being a “subgroup” in a larger “host group”. Many here have noted that this is a parasite-host strategy, and I think this is correct. 357 is correct regarding “hate”. Once a host group realizes it has a sub-group whose way “getting on in the world” is sucking strength and causing damage to the host, the host wants to shake off the parasite. Part of the process of parasite elimination is identifying the parasite and isolating it—in the minds of all members of the host group. This process includes what is called “hate”. Thanks for your insights! 61
Posted by Old Guy on May 21, 2008, 02:52 PM | # Rusty—have you been reading Carl Schmitt’s “The Concept of the Political”? He breaks things out in almost the exact same way. Great man and great theoretician! You’re so right that the language “we” use, when not accurately pointing at the correct “things”, aids and abets confusion. What to do? 62
Posted by Rusty Mason on May 21, 2008, 02:58 PM | # Hey, Old Guy, No, have not had the pleasure. I’ve just been studying Latin and Greek languages and literature. Thanks for the complimentary comparison, though. What to do? Learn and read Latin and Greek, of course! Vale! 63
Posted by 123 on May 21, 2008, 03:42 PM | # 357 “We as whites should ‘hate’ anyone or any group that is intentionally working towards eradicating the white-race’s genotype.” Precisely, and that’s why the jewish-invented christianity demands the exact opposite. 64
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 21, 2008, 04:55 PM | # I don’t for one second beleive the Jews are blind to the harm they’ve done or are doing to white nations; however, can we blame the Jews for the gross naivete of whites as evidenced by this? Self-Deception is rooted right down to the core of jewish identity. It’s probably hardwired at this point. When they do recognize the harm, they don’t see it as harm. In the limited sense in which they do recognize harm, it’s like the harm of cutting someone open during a surgery to save his life. They avoid debate the way Superman avoids kryptonite, to protect the tangled mass of self-deception and rationalization at the core of their identity. If there’s a gene for “the other guy has a point of view,” it’s absent or recessive in jews. Freedom of speech and all that except if some or any Jews at all, even some who lived 200 years ago, are criticized. Yes, and separation of Church and State as long as it serves their purposes (like having more Jewish holidays than Christian holidays in the U.S. Congress) I don’t get it…how come when jews do studies to support racist ummm i mean nationalist views all the sources are biased, but when you guys post it the sources are assumed to be fine? I mean I think both of them are wrong, but isn’t this a double standard? I don’t get it either. WTF are you on about?
more wonderful double standards. What double standard? Not that I see any problem with dual morality (double standards), mind. There are white jews. Not vis-a-vis my definition of white (or Euro, or what have you). No You can’t usually tell a jew from a gentile. Speak for yourself. My jewdar’s pretty reliable. But, even if I couldn’t tell at a glance - so what? Yet you disown them. You find any excuse to prove they are not white. They practically scream it at the top of their lungs. Mike Wallace practically came right out and stated “jewish != white” on national television. They may look like ducks. But they do not walk like ducks, quack like ducks, eat like ducks, fly like ducks, etc. Rusty: I think it’s helpful when sorting friends and foes to remember that in some languages there are two separate words for “enemy.” In Latin, for example, a personal enemy is an Inimicus and an enemy of a people, state,nation, or tribe is a Hostes, and that usually in the plural. Jesus admonished us to love our Inimicus, not the Hostes (that would be insane/JewDayO!Christian). I think confusion is introduced during English discussions of the JQ and similar because English speakers commonly only use one word for enemy. I propose a simple solution to this problem: that we all communicate in Latin. Sententia magna, nonne? I love stuff like this. We need to rehabilitate Christianity insofar as is possible, with every bit of stuff like this we can muster. 65
Posted by 357 on May 21, 2008, 05:06 PM | # 123 “Precisely, and that’s why the jewish-invented christianity demands the exact opposite.” With all due respect 123, I think you’re referring to the cultural-Marxist version of Christianity. The traditional Church’s teachings are contrary to what you assume. A couple of verses that come to mind will hopefully provide some clarification. There are many more, of course. I’m sure Fr. John can provide dozens. 1- Psalm 139:21-2221 and, 2-John 8:44 If the Jews invented Christianity for their own purposes, why would they incorporate such anti-Jewish passages within the text? 66
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 21, 2008, 06:13 PM | #
Well put.
Absent. They don’t have it. As for the reply we always hear, to the effect that: “Such-and-such race-replacement advocate, radical ‘feminist,’ communist, etc., whom you’re calling ‘Jewish’ isn’t Jewish but a self-hating atheist secularist Jew who never goes to temple on High Holy Days, who spits on the Jewish religion, makes fun of Jews, and supports the Palestinians” — this reply is like saying Saddam Hussein (who was widely known as, personally, a non-believer in Islam, a secularist, a modernizer who supported advanced education for girls, entry of women into every profession, draconian suppression of the veil, chador, burkha, honor killings and other aspects of Islam which he considered intolerably backward, and so on) — this reply is like saying “Saddam Hussein whom you’re trying to call a ‘Moslem’ was no Moslem but a personal non-believer in Islam and a radical secularist. He could not be considered a Moslem.” In each case, the case referring to the secularist Jew as no Jew and the one referring to the secularist Saddam as no Moslem, that pretend response (“pretend” because it’s disingenuous) fails to take into account the fundamental ways in which a tribe’s members aren’t any less members for not adhering to various rules and regulations of the tribe’s “official religion.” We’re talking about belonging to and being profoundly shaped by an ethnoculture, about blood ties, sense of identity, etc. Secularist Jews are certainly Jews for the political purposes we’re talking about in these sorts of discussions whether or not they support Israel, keep kosher, light a menorah, send their kids to schul, or go to temple on Yom Kippur. 67
Posted by 357 on May 21, 2008, 06:42 PM | # “Self-Deception is rooted right down to the core of jewish identity. It’s probably hardwired at this point. When they do recognize the harm, they don’t see it as harm. In the limited sense in which they do recognize harm, it’s like the harm of cutting someone open during a surgery to save his life. They avoid debate the way Superman avoids kryptonite, to protect the tangled mass of self-deception and rationalization at the core of their identity.”—Svyatoslav Igorevich That sounds like the description of a race of sociopaths. Oh well, as they say: If the shoe fits ...... 68
Posted by Desmond jones on May 21, 2008, 07:07 PM | # Does the fact that the Jews manage to drive the Euros to sickness, misery, and finally extinction every time they settle among them in large numbers mean we’re seeing the Darwinian survival of the fittest, the Euros deserving to go extinct and the Jews come out on top? Fred misses the point, apparent in Mr. Igorevich ‘s links above. Evolution works on an individual as well as a group level. Competition within a group produces an elite, for lack of a better term, that uses, in Svyatoslav Igorevich’s example, Jewish bailiffs, tax men etc. to extract from their co-ethnics a greater bounty, which then in turn enhances their fitness. It is when Jews pose a threat to the elite group, that a backlash, like the Magna Charta produced, occurs. However, as long as the action of the Hasidim in Postville (are these not the Crown Heights Jews?) increase profits at Tyson or Western Union, GM or Coca-Cola, then little will change. The virus, theoretically, must also evolve or perish. To use Mr. Igorevich ‘s example again, Jews in the middle ages, probably resembled the Postville Hasidim, more so than say Phillip Weiss. The viral example is syphilis. When it initially appeared it was a vicious killer. However, that meant the more virulent form died with the host. Thus the surviving element is more benign. It enables the host to survive longer and increases the chances of transmission. However, the virus does not discriminate. Jews are discriminating. The Talmud allows exceptions for aristocratic goyim, that would not be extended to the common folk. For instance a Jewish physician, treating the goy on the Sabbath. An exception was made for the King et al. And of course, in the modern Jewish community at large, that caveat has little impact anymore. The elite strategy also allows elite Jews to punish those Jews not conforming, more or less, to the system. Thus the Postville Hasidim gets whacked by ICE, at, apparently, Chertoff’s behest. The basic conflict is intra-group rather than inter-group; class rather than race. Those wealthy white liberal Oregonians are quite happy to vote for a black man. However, white, working class Kentuckians or West Virginians are loathe to do so. Elites will close the immigrant pipeline if they or their capital are threatened, for example, as it was in the twenties, when immigration was restricted because of the threat of insurrection/Bolshevism. Otherwise nothing will change. 69
Posted by DavidL on May 21, 2008, 07:16 PM | # 357 Over at the website greatreddragon.com, the site host refers to the “banksters” as psycho/sociopaths. The old book the website name is taken from does not disguise the Jewish influence behind the financial I have not read the book yet but it’s interesting you mention their twisted frame of mind. As I once heard, if Jews ran Heaven there would be pictures of Hell hanging on the walls. Thanks. 70
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 21, 2008, 08:58 PM | #
Forgive me, I read Desmond’s comment to see what point I missed but found the comment very hard to comprehend — after reading it for the fifth time and really concentrating, I found myself still unable to crack it and wished he’d used a less impenetrable style — came away scratching my head and wondering, “Wot’d he say????????” Nevertheless I think, please correct me, the gist was:
In other words, we Euros are being tormented and literally eradicated not by the Jews but by our own Euro élites who warmly approve of Jewish misbehavior or at least smile distractedly on it without paying it too much attention as long as it doesn’t bother them directly, and if it ever does, Watch out, Jews! I don’t know about that: I think the Jews, after seeing their power steadily build over eighty years (I’m talking about the U.S. here, not Canada), finally around the mid-‘60s became too strong for the Euro élites (as they, the Euro élites, were then constituted) and overpowered them, since which we live under genuine Jewish hegemony. The Euro hegemony was overthrown in the mid-‘60s and those years-long ‘60s public spectacles were sort of a Jewish victory dance. Desmond seems to be saying we’re living under a continuation of the old Euro (WASP) hegemony “but by Jewish proxy,” the Jews only appearing to rule while the Euros hold them on a leash ready to jerk their chain the minute the Jews displease them. I think the problem is far bigger: the Jews have wrested control of certain key aspects of our societal functioning and on their own, without needing to please any class of Euros or ask any class of Euros’ permission, are insisting on arranging those aspects they now control to their benefit as they see it and our dire detriment, our mortal peril even. Above, I added “as they, the Euro élites, were then constituted,” because a stronger Euro élite class than the one that caved in the mid-‘60s — caved apparently without very much of a fight — was and is certainly theoretically possible, one that wouldn’t have caved then and that will start taking steps now to recover the forfeited Euro position. So, with the advent of a new Euro élite, displacing the failed one, recapture of the former Euro position would seem inevitable. I didn’t understand, from Desmond’s comment, in what way the Postville Hasids incurred Chertoff’s wrath by “not conforming, more or less, to the system,” as Desmond put it. What did they do that got Chertoff mad at them? I can’t see why selling fraudulent work visas should have bothered him as long as no one found out, which no one would had he not raided them. Same goes for using the factory premises as an illegal street-drug (methamphetamine) lab: what does he care about that? Does anyone here believe his class — Chertoff’s and Bush’s class — doesn’t get its cut, via whatever indirect money-laundering schemes, of yearly drug trade profits in return for allowing the drug trade to flourish? Anyone here not believe they get their cut? 71
Posted by Desmond Jones on May 21, 2008, 10:04 PM | # Let’s use the example of the HRCs in Canada (Human Rights Commissions). They are largely maintained and fed by the membership of the CJC (Canadian Jewish Congress). The federal Tories are able, at this very moment, despite their minority position, to strike down, at least Section 13(1) the “hate speech” clause. Politically, they will be unopposed. The opposition Liberals are loathe to force an election, virtually under any circumstances, because they fear further devastation at the polls. However, the Tories don’t act. In fact, they submit a 50 page document, (probably largely written by Irwin Cotler’s group when he was AG) supporting the legislation. There are whispers, that in a free vote opposing Liberals will support the motion, based simply on the fundamental belief in freedom of speech. It’s unlikely the Jews at the National Post will abandon them because the Tories are big supporters of Israel. In summary, there appears no downside. Jewish support will largely be maintained. There is little threat of defeat, even as a minority government and a big boost from a populist campaign to save fundamental Canadian freedoms stretching as far back as the Magna Charta. But they won’t do it. Why? It must serve their constituency. The point Fred misses is that evolution occurs not just at the group level, but at the individual level as well. Dog eat dog…crabs in a bucket…all that stuff. Individuals in the same group will clamber over each other to get ahead. And in some groups they’ll use whatever means possible to do it. Use the South African example again. Elite Afrikaaners and SA Jews chose apartheid to preserve the benefit of cheap labour for the mines and agri-business instead of establishing a separate nation for earch racial group. Once apartheid appeared dysgenic for South African capital the governing class abandoned it, along with their co-ethnics to the viccissitudes of fate. 72
Posted by 357 on May 21, 2008, 10:34 PM | # “Does anyone here believe his class — Chertoff’s and Bush’s class — doesn’t get its cut, via whatever indirect money-laundering schemes, of yearly drug trade profits in return for allowing the drug trade to flourish? Anyone here not believe they get their cut?” Maxine Waters or Louis Farrakhan couldn’t have stated it better! LOL 73
Posted by EA Steve on May 21, 2008, 10:55 PM | # In response to Fred Scooby: I have realized we view the Jews, a little differently; and I am willing to ‘agree to disagree’ on the Jewish question. Whatever the case is, hopefully we will find a way, for our race to survive. 74
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 21, 2008, 11:29 PM | # I don’t get all of Desmond’s point. Evolution itself of course does not occur at the individual level, only the level of the group when the group’s less apt members have fewer offspring. This leaves the group more apt. The group has changed; none of its members has — they remain as apt or as inapt as ever. So, the group can change or “evolve,” not individuals. These individuals are stuck their whole lives with the way they are. The number of offspring they produce can affect evolution. 75
Posted by EA Steve on May 22, 2008, 12:18 AM | # Correction: In response to Fred Scrooby:
76
Posted by j on May 22, 2008, 12:31 AM | # To Igorevich: A thousand years of history in Poland has many different aspects, including those mentioned by you. But you will agree that Jews never possessed political power, and their influence, when they had it, was mostly of individuals and always depending on the sufferance of the king, nobles or landowners. The only time they had a large measure of raw political power was in the immediate post war period, under foreign (Russian) occupation. That historically very short period ended disastrously for the Jews involved (they were all jailed and expulsed) and for the Jewish community itself, which was forced to emigrate en masse. Thus ended one thousand years of Jewish presence in Poland. In the last 50 years there are no Jews in Poland. If you allow me a comment, I dont see that the Polish people are better for it. The liquidation of the other jewish communities in Russia for example is proceeding ahead very fast. There are less than 100,000 Jews left in Russia, and mostly they are in the capital and Saint Petersburg. Most have left to Israel. Regarding American Jews, it is also diminishing. Their fate will be similar to the South African Jews, which are leaving that country. I dont understand why some of the commenters seem to think that when a rich and well run country like South Africa or Rhodesia becomes degraded, that is good for the Jews. It is a tragedy for everybody. 77
Posted by John on May 22, 2008, 03:49 AM | #
If Mr. Farrakhan said that the earth revolves around the sun, I’d be inclined to believe him. 78
Posted by Darren on May 22, 2008, 05:18 AM | # Regarding American Jews, it is also diminishing. Their fate will be similar to the South African Jews, which are leaving that country. I dont understand why some of the commenters seem to think that when a rich and well run country like South Africa or Rhodesia becomes degraded, that is good for the Jews. It is a tragedy for everybody. It may not be “good for the Jews” but the actions that perpetuated the downfall of those two nations were disporportionately Jewish in character. Don’t most of the reactionary things Jews do end up being their demise? USSR, anybody? BTW, I replied to your previous post. 79
Posted by 123 on May 22, 2008, 07:52 AM | # “Regarding American Jews, it is also diminishing. Their fate will be similar to the South African Jews, which are leaving that country. I dont understand why some of the commenters seem to think that when a rich and well run country like South Africa or Rhodesia becomes degraded, that is good for the Jews. It is a tragedy for everybody.” I was studying at the Unversity of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg in South Africa during the apartheid era. There were plenty of jews studying there at the time, too. To my memory all without exception were in favour of abolishing apartheid and pro “one man one vote” (a synonym for tranfer of political leadership to the blacks). Apart from my observation this is also a known fact. Since I was young and unpolitical at the time I did not think much about it, never took it serious as it would have been lunacy to implement it, couldn’t comprehend it. For me it was very clear, that these demands were potentially detrimental for us whites and therefore for my fellow jewish students, too. I was really puzzled, but neverthelss, these were the facts. Nowadays I find, that practically all those jews, which I have known personally, due to the prevailing conditions have left (had to leave?) South Africa for many places worldwide ranging from New Zealand via Israel to Canada. So, yes it was certainly not directly to the jews advantage ,but perhaps indirectly insofar, that the benefits of the destruction of a white society outweigh the disadvantages experienced by the jews (one must not forget, that jews have a nomadic background, thus being very mobile is part of their heritage). If not so, then it is just completely irrational, perhaps instinctive behaviour of the jews, but then apparently that’s how they are. In either case, their behaviour then and there is identical to their behaviour here and now. I am afraid, that unless a miracle happens, the end result will be the same as well, the only difference being, that then it was a local event, whereas this time it will be world wide whereever there are whites. 80
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 22, 2008, 07:53 AM | # U.S. Jews were happy and thriving in 1965. Then they, the U.S. Jews, pried the U.S. borders open, something they had given themselves, as a community, top priority since 1924 to accomplish. They worked their fingers to the bone on all conceivable fronts, spent fortunes lobbying and bribing, devoted literally their lives to accomplishing it, many of them. They believed in it like they believed in communism, and boy did Jews back then believe in communism, they were all reds! — like communism, open borders and race-mixing of the goys was supposed to usher in a Jewish Golden Age. A place like today’s Detroit in other words, which for any non-Americans out there is the same as today’s Durban, South Africa, is supposed to be a Jewish Golden Age. Riiiiiiiiiight. Ever hear of the Diversity Lottery, J? That was a Jewish brainchild too: the U.S. Jews were scared maybe the non-whites weren’t pouring into the U.S. fast enough through the borders they had pried open so they came up with this Jewish scheme to assign residency visas to tens of thousands of non-whites chosen purely at random every year. Imagine someone doing that to Israel. The Jews did it to the U.S. Maybe they thought no one was watching them, no one would hate them for it. OK, mistakes were made, it’s not too late to fix them. Why isn’t the U.S. fixing them? Why isn’t the U.S. fixing them? Ever hear of THE JEWS? That’s the biggest reason why, J. Now that they’ve accomplished their longtime goal of prying the U.S. borders open they’re diminishing as a community and on the way to extinction according to J. Then why in hell did they pry the borders open, J? Can you as a Jew explain that? You live in Israel. Can you imagine what it would be like for Israelis if someone came along and pried Israel’s borders open, completely open, to the non-white Third World? And the non-white Third World came pouring in, as it’s come pouring into the United States? Of course J will say the Jews didn’t do it, the WASP establishment did and the Jews are innocent victims of open borders. Go re-read MacDonald, J: THE JEWS PRIED THE BORDERS OPEN. THE JEWS ARE RIGHT NOW THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE BY FAR, BOTH IN THE U.S. AND IN EUROPE, TO ANYONE CLOSING THEM AGAIN. Does the Jew York Times support closing the borders again, J? Does Abe Foxman? Does Morris Disease? Who are the Jews, and who are the Jewish organizations who wouldn’t fight against closing the borders again as fiercely as if their lives depended on it? Who? Name them. Yes there are other obstacles. Homosexuals. Clueless women voters. The capitalists like Bill Gates. The non-whites themselves, already entered, of course, exactly according to Jewish plan, obviously (“once they start pouring in it’ll become a politically irreversible fait accompli” was part of the plan from the beginning, as obviously goes without saying). BUT THE JEWS ARE THE BIGGEST. Why??????????? I know why. 81
Posted by Rusty Mason on May 22, 2008, 07:55 AM | # Fred Scrooby speculated, ” ... recapture of the former Euro position would seem inevitable. ” This is cheery. 82
Posted by 123 on May 22, 2008, 08:12 AM | # 357 “If the Jews invented Christianity for their own purposes, why would they incorporate such anti-Jewish passages within the text?” It was not my intention to hurt anyone’s religous feelings, nor do I want to start a theological discussion, nor do I claim to be an expert on religion, especially the Christian one. However, that Christianity was started by jews is probably not disputed. That it evolved over time and experienced a lot of white influences and in the end was transformed into a European religion being at odds with jews is probably undoubted as well. Anyhow, that is my understanding of the Christian history, hence my remark. What I was referring to specifically is the core belief of “offering the other cheek” or “loving your enemy”, etc. What better way to make your enemy defenseless by instilling this belief in him? And wouldn’t that be a virtually typical jewish strategy as well? 83
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 22, 2008, 09:59 AM | # Erratum:
I couldn’t remember that name so looked it up afterward, and it’s not duckweed I was thinking of but either Eurasian watermilfoil or water hyacinth, one of those two. But more importantly, look what I ran across in looking that information up: something having obvious applicability to the immigration/race-replacement crisis:
You get the idea — this very interesting article continues quite a bit further, in the same vein. I’ve made my point, I trust, in regard to its entire applicability to the present crisis of excessive incompatible immigration in the human case. As one can see, the basic science has all been worked out and awaits only its proper applications to the human case. 84
Posted by 357 on May 22, 2008, 11:07 AM | # “What I was referring to specifically is the core belief of “offering the other cheek” or “loving your enemy”, etc. What better way to make your enemy defenseless by instilling this belief in him? And wouldn’t that be a virtually typical jewish strategy as well?”—123 Of course you’re right in that context, but the doctrine of “turn the other cheek” has been misinterpreted and its meaning twisted for political purposes. The message of “turn the other cheek” comes into play only if there is an option to avoid an escalation of violence. If that option isn’t appropriate for a given situation, the doctrine of self defence comes into play. Keep in mind: to be a Christian doesn’t preclude oneself from smiting your enemy. As far as “loving your enemy” is concerned, I think Rusty Mason gave a good explanation in his post on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 06:22 PM | # IMHO, the philosophical disease that weakens our resolve to fight off the enemy isn’t traditional Christianity, it has more to do with secular-liberalism, postmodernism, and the like. _______________________________________ “If Mr. Farrakhan said that the earth revolves around the sun, I’d be inclined to believe him.”— John Then do you beleive Farrakhan when he says there’s a “Mothership hovering above the north pole with a fleet of vintage WWI aircraft armed with powerful bombs that will drill down into the earth when given the orders to do so which will result in wiping the white-man off the planet”? Of course you don’t. All kidding aside, the truth is: the kingpins of the drug trade are almost entirely comprised of brown and yellow skinned people (and lately the Jewish mafia have made some inroads). It’s totally inconceivable to me that prominent government officials such as Bush or Chertoff would involve themselves in such base enterprises. Why should they when they can amass obscene fortunes by working within the legal framework of the free market system; e.g., for Halliburton, Citigroup, GE, Hedge funds, etc. Heck, the Clintons’ net worth in the last 8 years rose to 109 million simply by writing books and giving speeches. Need I say more? 85
Posted by j on May 22, 2008, 12:13 PM | # I am glad that 123’s personal experience confirms 100% my comment on South Africa’s Jews. I am not glad about it at all. But what 123 says is true. Then why in hell did they pry the borders open, J? Can you as a Jew explain that? I dont know if it was the American Jewish community that did it, but I am sure of one thing, for good or for bad, Jewish organizations focus on Jewish issues and many American Jews or that generation could not sleep at night thinking at their failure to save even a few of the doomed European Jews. prof Macdonald´s first studies were erudite and objective, but lately he started to be obsessed with Jewish conspiracies. A pity. 86
Posted by Darren on May 22, 2008, 12:37 PM | # J: MacDonald writes things that are based in well-documented historical fact. Its funny how you will not acknowledge me anymore to provide a through answer to how MacDonald has done anything to the contrary. I dont know if it was the American Jewish community that did it, but I am sure of one thing, for good or for bad, Jewish organizations focus on Jewish issues and many American Jews or that generation could not sleep at night thinking at their failure to save even a few of the doomed European Jews. You don’t know? You preach ignorance despite given reams and reams of historical account that proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt? You claim to be familiar with MacDonald and claim that he publishes “conspiracies” cherry picked from anti-Jewish sources but you’re ignorant in knowing the truth about the situation either way. How can this be? Either you say MacDonald is wrong and know for certain, or you don’t know if MacDonald is wrong and maintain your uncertainty on the same basis. Chutzpah! (Or as we say on VNN Forum, “Nutzpah!”) 87
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 22, 2008, 12:49 PM | #
Drug money is laundered in various ways, redirected, sent on circuitous routes, rendered untraceable, and used in Washington DC as bribe money paid out to key individuals in return for keeping the law-enforcement heat off the traffickers. The drug-laundering BCCI bank was paying Clark Clifford, one of the absolute pillars of the old-time WASP DC establishment since the days of World War II, a giant of the U.S. establishment, a salary of something like two million dollars a year to be its figurehead honcho. The old-time Washington establishment’s most prominent figure, in other words, was raking in two million a year in laundered drug money. (His associate on the BCCI drug-money payroll was a Jewish wheeler-dealer named Altman, if memory serves, who was also the husband of the actress who played “Wonderwoman” in the TV series, Linda Carter.) Does anyone think the BCCI case was unique, as opposed to the tip of a huge hidden iceberg, which inadvertantly came to light due to sheer clumsiness on the part of the Pakistanis who were running it? Mexican and Tex-Mex mafia drug money was a very significant part of the financing that launched and nurtured the political careers of both Bushes, nitwit father and feebleminded son: they’re both WASP crooks. There’s also more direct involvement: there’s evidence Bill Clinton ran drug “protection rackets” out of the Arkansas governor’s mansion. Clinton of course is also a crook. Does 357 think pols like the Bushes, the Clintons, the Kennedys, LBJ, etc., came by and maintained their wealth “cleanly”? Look up BCCI at Wikipedia. Look up Billy Sol Estes. Look up Mena Airport. Look up that article by Steve Sailer which delved into some of the background of the Bush family’s decades-long personal connections with, business associations with, and campaign financing by, Mexican and Tex-Mex criminals, racketeers, con-men, and convicted murderers. 88
Posted by 357 on May 22, 2008, 01:44 PM | # “Does 357 think pols like the Bushes, the Clintons, the Kennedys, LBJ, etc., came by and maintained their wealth “cleanly”?” No. I stand corrected, Fred. Your post got me to remember the activity of a few more criminals. Those being: Yah Lin “Charlie” Trie, Johnny Chung, and Jack Abramoff. 89
Posted by torgrim on May 22, 2008, 02:03 PM | # Fred, “Look up BCCI, Billy Sol Estes, Mena Airport, Mexican, and Tex-Mex criminals.” Right on Fred. Just goes to show what happens to a nation when borders are ripped open. As I have mentioned before, if you have not seen the movie, “No Country for Old Men”, do so, as it is not very far from reality in the border states. I know this is somewhat off topic, due to criminallity and drug money, but the criminals in the banking houses are in part represented by guys like Milken and Hurwitz… 90
Posted by John on May 22, 2008, 02:30 PM | # Speaking of Farrakhan, I find nothing in this little rant I disagree with http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxO-z0XWaLc It looks like he’s been reading Eustace Mullins. 91
Posted by ben tillman on May 22, 2008, 03:19 PM | #
Your first sentence is correct, of course. However, I would propose that what happens is that the “elite”, if they are of us, are misled to think that collaboration with Jewry will enhance their fitness. I don’t think you can model it so that the loss of that great store of their own genetic structures in their co-ethnics can be offset by the gains in “personal” fitness, i.e., success in intragroup competition. If the “elite” are not of us, even if only through a minority admixture of alien genetic structures, then the conflict is not one of class, but one of race.
I would say that the manufactured conflict is intragroup, or class, conflict. The basic conflict is racial, and the creation of class conflict is but a strategem in that conflict. 92
Posted by Desmond Jones on May 22, 2008, 05:31 PM | # I don’t think you can model it so that the loss of that great store of their own genetic structures in their co-ethnics can be offset by the gains in “personal” fitness, i.e., success in intragroup competition. Isn’t this what the MacDonald /Murray theory of Jewish intelligence suggests? In A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy KMac writes:
Murray writes:
Surely, it works in the reverse as well. Lower IQ farming Jews saw themselves as distant from the high IQ Jewish elite, however, the high IQ elite must also see these lower class Jews as not of them. In other words they become the ‘other’ and thus reviled almost as much as the goyim. David Cannadine’s observations in Ornamentalism suggests this was the view also adopted by the British elite.
93
Posted by Rusty Mason on May 22, 2008, 10:20 PM | # In this recording, Ron Paul names the neo-cons and explains their evil, leftist ideology: 94
Posted by snax on May 23, 2008, 05:33 AM | # Fred >> Drug money is laundered in various ways…. The Jewish Laundry of Drug Money http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7573 Appeared in Maariv, but not the NY Times. 95
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 23, 2008, 09:20 AM | # Everyone should read that article Snax linked: the Columbian drug cartels’ drug money all gets laundered by U.S. and Israeli Hadidic Jews and the “muscle” for the cartels is provided by the Russian-Jewish mafias. Jews who get tipped off they’re about the be arrested by the FBI flee to Israel taking their profits with them, and it’s impossible to extradite them from there. They’re safe there. One of the purposes of the modern state of Israel is, apparently, a thieves’ den, a hideout where thieves, once they gain its shores, can’t be apprehended. 97
Posted by Rusty Mason on May 23, 2008, 10:27 AM | # Jackie Mason, Cranky Old Marxist 98
Posted by 357 on May 23, 2008, 11:52 AM | # Nice essay over at your blog, Rusty. Things are changing; Jewish banking hegemony is being challenged by the oil producing countries in the middle-east. Today, with oil futures topping $132 a barrel, this is resulting in their sovereign wealth funds to overflow with petrodollars. They are wisely using their robust sovereign wealth funds to buy large portions of banks and other Wall Street financial firms. Let’s just hope they don’t ever get complete control of the US based Agri-corporations, i.e., our means of food production. 99
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 23, 2008, 02:58 PM | # JWH comments on the side-discussion Desmond brought up and Ben Tillman replied to, having to do with whether the fundamental stuggle is mostly intra-ethny or mostly inter-ethny — in other words, is the race-replacement crisis we currently find ourselves in fundamentally a problem of Euro élites attacking Euro non-élites or fundamentally a problem of Non-Euro Caucasians (Jews, that is) attacking Euros (whichever it is, neither is acting exclusively — there are elements of both of course — but which is more fundamental)?
100
Posted by Desmond Jones on May 23, 2008, 06:47 PM | # People look at immediate short-term gains to their immediate families - and of course, to themselves - and usually do not perceive the .long-term loss at the level of ethny Okay, but are not “elites” employing a Salterian strategy but at the city-state/neighborhood level? Jupiter Island, Florida, Greenwich Connecticut, Kensington Palace Garden, London, UK or Sea Island, Georgia are 90-95% white. Vast wealth, transfered from mid-low IQ whites through mass immigration, allows de facto segregation through the formation of ethnic city states. Thus there is no (or very little) child equivalent loss at the city-state level. Is that not MacDonald’s point that the EGI loss will occur mostly, if not overwhelmingly at the low IQ level? 101
Posted by ben tillman on May 23, 2008, 11:27 PM | # “JWH comments on the side-discussion Desmond brought up and Ben Tillman replied to….” Thanks for pointing that out, Fred. Desmond, you’re a smart fellow. You’re well-read. You’re talking about group-forming behavior, in the words of Sir Arthur Keith. Model it. Flesh it out. Convince me I’m me wrong. 102
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 08:34 AM | # In the comment just above Ben Tillman’s, Desmond suggests that the strategy currently being pursued by Euro élites for dealing with the race problem (a problem which they see just as everyone does but don’t want to adopt an honest strategy for dealing with, since ... well ... they’re scum bags), a strategy of allying themselves with the Jews (who want to extinguish Euros altogether because they hate them with a passion — which the Euro élites may realise and not care about in the slightest, or may not realise because they’re too dense, I haven’t figured out which) and helping the Jews to racially screw over the Euro élites’ co-racialist middle class and proles — helping the Jews throw the Euro middle-class and prole co-racialists to the (non-white) lions, so to speak — may look like a mean thing to do to the Euro middle-class and prole co-racialists but actually makes sense as long as the Euro élites can manage to keep themselves and their immediate families from being thrown, by the same Jews in alliance with yet other collaborating Euro élites, to the same (non-white) “lions” by isolating themselves in fortress-like gated communities patrolled by armed guards privately hired which keep Negroes and Mexicans strictly out (all but an ultra-microscopic number of tokens, very light-skinned, lavishly affirmative-action salaried, fairly-to-quite good at imitating white behavior on the surface though without any of the substance, not-yet-regressed-to-the-racial-mean-which-will-come-but-not-till-the-next-generation-so-it-needn’t-bother-us-short-attention-span-cognitively-and-morally-challenged-incapable-of-planning-for-the-future-Euro-élites). JWH replies to Desmond. 103
Posted by 357 on May 24, 2008, 09:24 AM | # The White elites, especially in America can no longer insulate themselves or their families from the wonderful benefits of diversity and multiculturalism. Even the most “exclusive” neighborhoods are homes to lowlife ghetto trash such as Snoop Dog, Mr. T, Farrakhan, and countless black professional athletes, etc, etc, etc. Where did Reverend Jeremiah “The BULLFROG” Wright build his mansion? Answer: in a predominantly white gated community. As Rev. Wright says, “The chickens have come hooooome to Roost.” LOL 104
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 09:39 AM | # The following passage from JWH’s reply to Desmond (see link in my previous comment) also, in my view, sheds light on a part of what motivates (probably subconsiously motivates largely, although certainly there are some Jews who think of it explicitly) certain Diaspora Jews to buck the general worldwide Diaspora-Jewish position of favoring the aggressive annihilation of the Euro races through the strategy of forcing race- and species-mixing and replacement on them: these Jews who are made distinctly uneasy by this Abe-Foxman-type goal of their Diaspora brethren know or instinctively “feel” they are part-Euro — which they are, in fact — and are content to be part-Euro, are not displeased at being part-Euro — may positively like it, even be pirvately, quietly grateful for it, proud of it — and they don’t wish to pursue a course which will ultimately take away their part-Euroness by gradually increasing Diaspora-Jewish Semiteness at the expense of Euroness, bringing Euroness close to zero if you “extend the graphs out far enough.” There are Jews who either instinctively or explicitly in their minds don’t want the Euroness genetically scrubbed out of them — they are satisfied to be part Euro and see no need to revert to being one-hundred-percent Semitic. Here’s the JWH passage I refer to:
If the part-Euro Diaspora Jews in Diaspora Jewdom were “secure” but all European-derived peoples elsewhere became race-replaced by others it would be the beginning of the steady, gradual decrease of the Euro proportion in the make-up of Diaspora Jews, and the corresponding steady, gradual increase of the Semite proportion. It would portend a race-change, in other words, for part-Euro Diaspora Jews, one that would take them racially further from European and closer to Semitic. There are Jews who don’t see why they should undergo that, who see the link between its inevitability and eradicating Euros through forcing race- and species-replacement on them, and who for that reason oppose forcing race- and species-replacement on them: they see no reason why they should change racially from being part-Euro to being one-hundred-percent Semitic and in would prefer not to undergo such a change. 105
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 09:58 AM | # That’s assuming they didn’t change into part-Chinese or some other “third alternative” altogether — maybe even part-Negro (you’d have a lot of Lani Guiners and Lenny Kravitzes running around, the new Diaspora Jews — well, lots of Diaspora Jews don’t want that for their future). 106
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 09:59 AM | # (Correction, her name is Lani Guinier, not Guiner) 107
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 10:06 AM | # The Jews who push this stuff are like moles burrowing in the earth, completely blind to whatever is further away than the tip of their nose. Of course there aren’t words to describe how bad the Euro élites are who collaborate with them, such as the one who’s just been diagnosed with a brain tumor, the one who’s president and his father before him, and both those who are/hoping to be candidates to be the next president. 108
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 10:40 AM | # Some of them push this stuff on themselves, of course. Here‘s an Israeli Jew who wants to destroy the Israeli nation-state and, in a sense, the Jewish people along with it: Professor Schlomo Sand. Jews like this are the homozygotes for the Jewish nation-destroying gene, Jews like Abe Foxman (who want to preserve Israel and destroy everything else) being the heterozygotes. 109
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 10:41 AM | # (Sorry again: make that Shlomo Sand, not “Schlomo.”) 110
Posted by 357 on May 24, 2008, 11:13 AM | # The negroes are not only moving into what once was exclusive white neighborhoods, B. Hussien and his vengeful wife have a good chance to move into the White House come January 2009. Elites’ (both Jew and gentile) disdain for common working whites notwithstanding, this unthinkable event can only come about with the support of the grass-root white masses. For the most part, I don’t trust the white masses. Too many of them are mentally ill liberals anxious to vote in a black president. They’re motivated to do so in order to sooth their conscious of the imaginary sin of “white-guilt.” 111
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 24, 2008, 01:34 PM | # Why is this page a mile wide? I’m not seeing an image or link that would explain this. 112
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 24, 2008, 01:43 PM | # 357: That sounds like the description of a race of sociopaths. Oh well, as they say: If the shoe fits… Insofar as that’s true, it’s true racially, but not individually. Odd, isn’t it? j: [paraphrasing] But why would jews do these things that I regard as masochistic?” Jewish behavior and jewish motives are distinct. I do not claim to be a psychic. But let’s not conflate these two distinct entities and then use one to cast doubt on the other! Jewish behavior is quite clear. Jewish motives are less clear, and often involve incomprehensible contradictions, rationalizations, denials, etc. You’re the jew, you tell me! because the Diaspora is intrinsically bad for the Jews. How so? You’ve got some pretty big up sides to balance out, before I buy that one. Obviously, a diaspora makes a group harder to target; makes diversification easier; makes for a convenient middleman group anywhere in the world a jew might travel; keeps jews fighting the heathen, rather than one another (as in Israel today); makes for a wide variety of bolt-holes all over the world; allows for remittance to Israel; I can keep going like this but mostly I’ll be expanding upon these same themes. True, you do have a point about assimilation, but jews have been dealing with that for 3000 years. Their track record strongly suggests they’ll figure it out (and evidence suggests they’re proactive in this regard). It’s easy to confuse the historical pattern of jewry (one-way gene flow, defection of the less able, etc.,) with destruction via assimilation. prof Macdonald´s first studies were erudite and objective, but lately he started to be obsessed with Jewish conspiracies. A pity. Restating his positions as straw men, then attacking the latter, is a less than persuasive strategy j. John: Speaking of Farrakhan, I find nothing in this little rant I disagree with http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxO-z0XWaLc Flying saucers aside, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I saw Louie on C-SPAN telling whites they might need to form organizations to protect their interests from Jewish predation; he’ll have to go a long way to ruin the goodwill that generates in my mind. Scroob: They’re safe there. One of the purposes of the modern state of Israel is, apparently, a thieves’ den, a hideout where thieves, once they gain its shores, can’t be apprehended. Ever heard William Pierce’s broadcast on the double whammy of the diaspora and Israel? Pretty good stuff. 113
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 05:34 PM | #
I agree, a very nice essay — just went back and read it. I happen to like Jackie Mason who actually is closer to our side on certain issues than some may think (and he is certainly no marxoid type), but that essay was excellent for its summary of the overall facts of Jewish success in this country and the Eurosphere, and of the harm that tremendous success places them in a position to do, harm to Euros. Nice job, Rusty. 114
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 24, 2008, 09:23 PM | # I just saw this signature slogan at another site:
“Race” could be substituted for “WW-II” there. A number of other things could as well. 115
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 25, 2008, 10:49 AM | # Looking for something just now in my computer files, I happened across the following fragment which must have been an e-mail I began, then apparently never finished or sent. Before erasing it from my files it I’ll post it here if I may, since it says one or two things that others may agree need saying even if in fragmentary fashion:
116
Posted by Desmond Jones on May 25, 2008, 10:43 PM | # Model it. The common model of reciprocal altruism appears to be a variation of the guy with a lot full of trees. He has nine trees on his lot each with an assumed genetic value of two units. However, to garner the genetic benefit he must harvest the trees that day. The most he can do are four trees in a day. 4 trees x 2 units = 8 genetic units in total accrue to the owner. He decides to call his brother and friend to assist. He cuts three trees, his brother cuts three and the friend, a co-ethnic cuts three. The genetic benefit then is (3x2)(1) + (3x2)(1/2) + (3x2)(1/12?) = 10.4 genetic units. If he chooses his brother and a Mexican illegal to cut the trees and the Mexican is willing to give him two of the three trees he cuts, then (5x2)(1) + (3x2)(1/2) + (1x2)(0) = 13 genetic units accrue to the owner. The problem is the model doesn’t account for the reduction of EGI by 0.8 child equivalent through the presence of the Mexican. Re: the Germans…in the Canadian or even the US model the threat to the Germans will be mitigated. Societies that are multi-racil versus bi-racial (like Fiji or Guyana where there is conflict between two relatively equal-sized ethnic groups) are more stable. Alliances must be formed with other out groups to undermine the “elite” German position. In Canada, there are Muslims (of all varieties), blacks, reds, browns, yellows and various white ethnic groups all in competition not only with the Anglo majority but with each other. It also allows the elites to limit freedoms because the ethnic groups are more afraid of each other than they are of the government, as Mill suggested. If the elite behaviour is maladaptive (i.e there is a net genetic loss through reciprocal reciprocity toward Mexicans) and it certainly appears to be case, then why do they continue the behaviour? Either they are hypocrites, as Jared Taylor suggests, or they are purely altruistic. In either case it portends extinction. In ‘Origin’, Darwin proclaims that there has never been a species that evolved to serve another. He writes of the aphids that secrete a sweet nectar when stimulated by ants, but then suggests that it serves the aphids purpose as well. The only conclusion to draw is that white elites evolved an entirely unprecedented suicidal tendency in their undaunting pursuit of capital or that pure altruism is maladaptive. Neither of which makes sense. 117
Posted by Zsidozas on May 26, 2008, 06:34 AM | # re: j - “Jews were very much opressed and discriminated against during the thousand years of Polish history. Not once Jews attained any political power, on the contrary, they were absolutely powerless and barely “tolerated” .” Either your knowledge of Jewish-Polish history is terrible or you are a liar. As the facilitators and monopolizers of the economy of Poland, Jews were indeed persecuted and despised there, but they still thrived in Poland because by controlling the economy they de facto controlled many political issues too. For the longest time Jews were, in fact, second in line in the economic/political/social hiearchy only to the Polish nobility (some of whom actually had some Jewish roots) because they were economic middlemen between the dirt-poor Polish peasant agrarians and the parasitic nobility. Some Jews were so rich that they eventually had many Polish nobles in debt to them, and sometimes when this happened the nobles expelled them or fomented pogroms so they didn’t have to pay back their debts to these plutocratic Jews. So, like so many Ashkenazi Jews everywhere throughtout their history, they were clever economic rapists, and in Poland Jews were DOUBLY parasitic since they leeched off of both the peasants and nobility. And remember this crucial fact: if you control the money you generally also control the politics. Go check your facts if you are trying to make a point, because you are making yourself look foolish by spouting your nonsensical lies. 118
Posted by Z on May 26, 2008, 06:55 AM | # “In Europe the Jews become like the zebra mussel in the Great Lakes: they take over. The counterbalancing checks and forces that acted on them and everyone else back home are suddenly gone and they run rampant in the new environment that has a different set of checks and balances that aren’t tuned to keeping them controled.” Fred - your analogy comparing the Jews in Euro/White societies to an invasive and foreign species of plants/animals and the destructive effects which inevitably follow is excellent and works very well. Thanks for sharing that. 119
Posted by Keith Jacka on May 26, 2008, 10:59 AM | # I think that Kevin MacDonald is aware of the specialized and limited of jewish gifftedness, as measured by IQ. He almost always talks of Jews scoring high on verbal intelligence. 120
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 26, 2008, 01:03 PM | # A thread comment I just saw (link at the little cross-hatch at the end):
You don’t need Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s books to know who’s in control of our society — just look at the hierarchy of taboos, who’s getting arrested for what, and the way people are afraid of their own shadow when broaching certain topics of discussion. Look, let’s say you’re a tourist in Somalia. You don’t say anything disrespectful about Mohammed. Don’t ask why, you just don’t, OK? Take my word for it. It has to do with who controls the society over there. Or let’s say you’re a tourist in a remote mountain village of Sicily. You don’t say anything disrespectful about any of the guy’s sisters in the village. Just trust me on this one, OK — you just don’t. Has a lot to do with who runs society there. Likewise, let’s say you’re in any European country. You don’t wanna ask any questions about the Holocaust. Don’t argue, you just don’t — same story: it has to do with who runs society in Europe these days, OK? What did you think, do I have to spell it out for you? OK, yeah, without naming names it’s the same ones who ram MTV down teenagers throats over there instead of decent progamming. And lots of other crap. The same exact crowd. Hey you catch on quick. Now see you don’t forget it — if you wanna stay out jail, that is ..... 121
Posted by j on May 27, 2008, 12:59 PM | # Re: Zsidozas “Either your knowledge of Jewish-Polish history is terrible or you are a liar. ” None. Moreover, your description of the historical position of the Jews in Poland confirms what I said: Never, ever, had POLITICAL power. They were always dependent on the mercy or tolerance of the ruling political class, the king and the nobles. They were allowed to trade and manage estates, on the condition that they were useful and paid heavy taxes. And there was a large jewish proletariat too, a large mass of Jewish unskilled laborers and people living of charity. Jews never enjoyed living in the Polish diaspora and left as soon as they could. Political power, zsidozas, is what the what the Mbezi has in South Africa, not the money that Cape Indian shopkeepers hoard. 123
Posted by Robert Reis on May 28, 2008, 12:02 AM | # Friday, May 23, 2008 Scenario A: “There has always been a world-wide conspiracy among people who simply HATE Jews for no good reason whatsoever. These ‘haters’ presumably have families, jobs and other commitments, but they’d somehow rather spend their time on the internet writing obsessively elaborate essays about how nasty the Jews are and forsaking everything they previously enjoyed just to endlessly spout hatred against an innocent race of oppressed people whose harmless customs and ways they simply don’t understand. Everything without exception that has ever been written about the Jews in an anti-Semitic context has either been a malicious forgery, a hoax, or else a mis-translation from Jewish holy works, or else an innocent (or malicious) misdirection. However, it’s usually something purposely contrived to falsely demonize an ancient, noble and religious people. Alternatively it may be a total fabrication designed to portray Jews in a bad light for no valid reason whatsoever - by a bunch of Nazis who hate outsiders for nothing more than simply being different to everyone else. The basis of all anti-Semitism is ignorance.” Scenario B: “The Jews are a tribe of terminally sick, amoral malingerers that have been repeatedly kicked out of just about every place in the known world at one time or another throughout all recorded history. This is due to the totally selfish, exploitative and manipulative way they use and abuse others to their own ends. This is wholly unacceptable to decent people of other cultures that have afforded the Jews sanctuary - and have been kicked in the teeth for their trouble. Apostate Jews have warned gentiles throughout the ages of the malign intent of their former brethren and exposed their wicked ways for all with the will to see. Jews are a race apart. They ARE different from all other peoples on earth and they revel in their cultural and religious immutability. When they dwell among others, as they must as all parasites have to, they NEVER assimilate or conform to the host society’s norms. Rather, they impose their own ‘morality’ upon the host. They are Jews first, foremost and ALWAYS. The peoples among whom they find safe haven and protection are nothing more than ‘heathen’ or ‘goyim’ - a peasant underclass of slaves who have no more rights in this world to own property, make laws, or marry than a goat, a sheep or a pig. The basis of anti-Semitism is an understandable, deep-seated resentment towards a group of people holding such abhorrent views.” Somewhat of a no-brainer, wouldn’t you say? Posted by Phaedrus: 124
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 31, 2008, 05:48 PM | # On the log entry’s topic of “Jews shutting down debate,” it’s now starting to trickle out how Zionist-Jewish TV network bosses shut down debate over Bush’s invasion of Iraq, propping up and enabling the neocon war criminals in the commission of their crimes against humanity (“starting aggressive wars” or even, I believe, merely “plotting to start them,” was one of the hanging offenses at the Nuremberg Trials, if memory serves). (Hat tip.) 125
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 31, 2008, 05:57 PM | # But these same Jewish media bosses would never shut down debate over immigration, race, race-relations, or race-replacement. Never. Never in a million years. I cannot believe they’d exert their immense power in any other way: squelching debate over Iraq was a one-off. Never happen again, and never happened on any other subject. Absolutely not. 126
Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 31, 2008, 11:26 PM | # A propos of the log entry’s title: 1) 2) (Hat tip.) 127
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 03, 2008, 07:04 PM | # A good intro to the gigantic Holocau$t® lie, for those new to the subject (as I was when I first started to read about it three years ago): http://www.codoh.com/newrevoices/nrillusion.html (Hat tip: TheCivicPlatform.com) 128
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 04, 2008, 01:33 PM | # Some examples of shutting down debate, from Serge Trifkovic ( http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=606 ) (Hat tip: http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/eu-for-everyone-except-europeans.html ):
I don’t think it’s happening in all these places in such perfect synchronization entirely by itself. I think it’s being orchestrated by Washington D.C. What did the Eastern European communist countries (the Soviet “satellites,” remember that?) do during Moscow’s communist hegemony over them? Simple — they did what Moscow wanted them to do. Had Japan won the war and set up its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere what would countries such as Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, the Philippines, Manchukuo, Korea, and whatever Japanese-occupied puppets there were carved out of China in addition to Manchukuo — what would all of them do, had Japan won the war? Easy: whatever Japan wanted them to do. Had Germany won the war and arranged Europe to its liking, what would European countries be doing now? They’d be doing what Germany wanted, certainly not race-replacing themselves with Negroes. Well, the U.S. won the war, so put two and two together: what are the European countries doing? They’re doing what the U.S. wants, and what a certain ethnicity which achieved unchallenged hegemony over the U.S. in the 1960s wants. I see WW II as the war fought to make the Eurosphere safe for government-enforced race-replacement. The side having that as its agenda, its war aim, won and is implementing its agenda. This race-replacement disease, this frenzy on the part of every Eurosphere country to get itself race-replaced, didn’t just spring up independently in each of these countries but has been not only orchestrated but imposed by D.C. That’s my view. It’s true what people say, that WW II was the only good war of the last century. Yes, most definitely. Unfortunately, the good side lost. 129
Posted by 123 on June 04, 2008, 03:21 PM | # “I see WW II as the war fought to make the Eurosphere safe for government-enforced race-replacement.” Exactly so, spot on! 130
Posted by Guessedworker on June 04, 2008, 06:41 PM | # Fought by whom? What was Appeasement, then? A policy adopted by Chamberlain to avoid race-replacement? You have to account for the enormous and humiliating efforts of the British, particularly, to avoid war in 1938. WW2 did not begin as a political war against some regnant blot of nationalist feeling on the European ideological landscape. It began as a response against the German land-grab. What it became is annother matter. But with lebensraum it would have been an entirely different matter, and the old nations of eastand central Europe might never have become soviet satellites. 131
Posted by Captainchaos on June 04, 2008, 07:53 PM | # Britain and France’s participation in World War Two was silly. Hilter had no designs on the British Empire. He could have ended the war as far as Britain was concerned at Dunkirk. He choose not to as a gesture of good will. If Hitler could have mustered all his forces towards the east Germany almost certainly would have been successful in crushing judeo-Bolshevism. Europe would have been rid of our great misfortune, the jews, and we would not be suffering the looming genocide of our race presently. Seems pretty black and white to me. 132
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 04, 2008, 09:57 PM | #
That’s a good point. I’ll readily concede that. That war may have begun with one set of aims in mind and been hijacked in mid-course by interests who, wresting the tiller out of the hands of the original steersmen, re-set the course in a whole new direction. A certain ethnic group, one that was deeply involved in that war on this side of the Atlantic, happens to be good at doing that, as witness their transformation of what we used to have in this country, a veritable paradise on earth known as the U.S.A., to what we now have thanks to them, a “proposition nation,” or “Negrotopia, The Final Jewish Vengeance.” It’s the behavior of viruses, getting into the cell’s nuclear DNA and redirecting it to manufacture a whole new set of proteins, ones of no use to the infected cell but useful to the virus. So yes, I’ll concede that point. 133
Posted by 357 on June 05, 2008, 09:24 AM | # “A certain ethnic group, one that was deeply involved in that war on this side of the Atlantic, happens to be good at doing that, as witness their transformation of what we used to have in this country, a veritable paradise on earth known as the U.S.A., to what we now have thanks to them, a “proposition nation,” or “Negrotopia, The Final Jewish Vengeance.” It’s the behavior of viruses, getting into the cell’s nuclear DNA and redirecting it to manufacture a whole new set of proteins, ones of no use to the infected cell but useful to the virus.” Scrooby, just so you know, I’m not following you around this site but I must say your comment goes to the crux of the matter. There’s no getting around the fact that Jews are at the core of 99% of everything that is corrosive to Western civilization. Fact: all the left-wing-political movements and policies can be traced back to Jewish intellectuals. Also, left-wing-policies disguised as right-wing policies can be attributed to Jews, i.e., the neo-con agenda. My opinion about Hitler is conflicted to say the least, especially in light of his lebensraum program. But then there’s this: >>>“If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men. Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands. Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord [ ... ]
Here he stops at nothing, and in his vileness he becomes so gigantic that no one need be surprised if among our people the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew. The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies. While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man whom the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked, which, in the eyes of such an official ass, passes as the preservation of state authority and the safeguarding of law and order.” 134
Posted by Captainchaos on June 06, 2008, 12:50 PM | # Here are somemore incites from Hitler: “Today the right of citizenship, as mentioned above, is primarily achieved by birth within the borders of a state. In this, race and nationality play no role whatever. A Negro, who formerly lived in the German protectorates and now has residency in Germany, gives birth to a German citizen in the person of his child. Likewise every Jew or Polish, African or Asiatic can be declared a German citizen without further ado. I know that people do not like to hear all this; but anything more thoughless, more hare-brained than our present-day citizenship laws scarcely exists.” Sounds like good sense to me. 135
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 06, 2008, 02:53 PM | # The (fill in the blank) ______ who run the TV network Lou Dobbs works for have … well, to put it the way Lyndon Johnson once did in referring to an associate’s exceedingly servile behavior who’d been maneuvered into someone else’s control, they have Dobbs’ pecker in their pocket: http://www.vdare.com/walker/080605_dobbs.htm http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/lou-dobbs-filth.html You see, the (fill in the blank) ______ only permit questioning of “illegal non-white immigration” if there is simultaneous enthusiastic endorsement of vast increases in legal non-white immigration — the non-whiter the better, as goes without saying. How do I know this isn’t Dobbs’ real position but he’s saying it solely to hang onto his job? Well … let’s call it the sum-total of all my life experiences culminating in a two-plus-two-equals-four moment. That’s how. 136
Posted by Tom Ball on June 10, 2008, 01:31 AM | # Dear Mr Scrooby, I read your comments for a long time. Thanks for articulating what many people know to be true but can’t say either because they lack the facilities or the fortitude. I have been a victim of their discrimination myself but I don’t know how you can oppose big bucks without educating the masses. And the masses have seduced and brainwashed by hollywood. Popular opinon is a greater influence than moral imperatives. It’s a small consolation to know that once they have succeded in destroying the social constraints of the ethics of Christianity (hypocracy notwithstanding) that Satan whom they serve will enjoy taking them to hell along with their prostitutes and slaves. I am sorry to admit that I too was duped by the social movement of the 1960s that they engineered. The only excuse I have is youthful foolishness and a host of problems. I realize now that I was an unwitting participant in my own destruction. I would do most anything to redeem myself. And it grieves me to see the nation as a whole following blindly down that same road. A price must be payed for all sins. I can only pray Christ will pick up the tab for me. But it is certain that I will continue to pay for those mistakes for the remainder of my natural life. If “righteousness exalteth a nation”, what does unrighteousness do? The apparent relish with which they appear to consume their ill gotten gains can’t last forever. Surely they will have to pay for the evil they bring into this world as much as I must. But I consider myself blest above them that the Lord has chosen to chastise me for my errors in order to open my eyes before it was too late. As gauling as they can be, I think maybe they should be pitied if they remain blind to the inevitable outcome of refusing to obey the gospel. “They think they are rich but they are poor”. The most I hope for in this world is to leave it without losing my soul. Let them continue to sin. If they continue in the present trend , evil goy will realize what’s in his own worldly interest. Even if he’s as stupid as they think he is, they don’t lack shrewdess and I know many that are as much ” a brood of vipers” as they are.
137
Posted by Zsidozas on June 10, 2008, 05:06 AM | # Re: Captainchaos on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 04:50 PM Interesting points about citizenship and territory. Hitler also wrote about the unfair advantage that Jews have in this respect. He wrote that since Jews are a rootless and forever mobile ethnic/racial group they aren’t subject to territorial limitations (like the Swedes or Japanese or Iranians, for instance). The following description is excellent and helps to partially explain the power that Jewry has gained in the world because, as stated above, they aren’t limited to specific nations or territories as are the rest of the ethnic/racial groups on Earth, and thus their potential for economic/political/social infiltration, expansion, and imperialism aren’t limited either. From Hitler’s ZWEITES BUCH: “The Jew has never had a territorially bounded state of his own in the manner of Aryan states. Nevertheless his religious community is a real state since it guarantees the preservation, the increase and the future of the Jewish people. But this is solely the task of the state. That the Jewish state is subject to no territorial limitation, as is the case with Aryan states, is connected with the character of the Jewish people which is lacking in the productive forces for the construction and preservation of its own territorial state. Just as every people as a basic tendency of all its earthly actions possesses a powerful urge for self-preservation as its driving force, likewise is it exactly so with Jewry too. Only here, in accord with their basically different dispositions, the struggle for existence of Aryan peoples and Jewry is also different in its forms. The foundation of the Aryan struggle for life is the soil, which he cultivates and which provides the general basis for an economy satisfying primarily its own needs within its own orbit through the productive forces of its own people. Because of the lack of productive capacities of its own the Jewish people cannot carry out the construction of a state, viewed in a territorial sense, but as a support of its own existence it needs the work and creative activities of other nations. Thus the existence of the Jew himself becomes a parasitical one within the lives of other peoples. Hence the ultimate goal of the Jewish struggle for existence is the enslavement of productively active peoples.” + http://www1.yadvashem.org/about_holocaust/documents/part1/doc5.html 138
Posted by nemesis on September 16, 2008, 09:09 AM | # Generalized Set…The Fact about the Jews THE SKULL. The generalized skull shape of the average Yid is also an abomination. The skull shape more often than not exacerbates the sense of “GENERALISED SET”. Particularly around the eye and upper cheek cavities. In fact, some scholars have even surmised that the Yid skull may have extra terrestrial origins. This is an area that may be worthy of further erudition although due to the hazy nature of so much antique history, it is perhaps only through the most notable archaeological endeavours that we might be able to learn more about the exact origins of “GENERALIZED SET” Yours faithfully Nemesis 139
Posted by Guessedworker on September 16, 2008, 09:59 AM | # I think that pretty much qualifies as race-hatred unrelieved by any higher purpose than to dehumanize, Nemesis. How would you like the same kindness applied to you and yours? This blog is not at all the place to post material like that. You will need to find somewhere else if you want to disseminate your “important academic discoveries”. I will delete any further offerings as soon as I see them. 140
Posted by 34coupe on April 19, 2010, 01:47 AM | # guessedworker, I think you are being unreasonable about Nemesis’s comments. I think that his observations are fundamentally correct. I mean for instance, you wouldn’t say a person’s perceptions were askew if he said that negroes typically have dark skin, big eyes and large pouting lips. Perhaps Nemesis’s probl;em is not so much his observations as the way he writes about them, let alone the generalisations he uses. However, if we can all come down from our “politically correct . cosy little niches and accept that this guy is alligning the temperament and behavior of Jews with their physical characteristics, he makes some legitimate points. I and many other people through history have oftened pondered the physical disposition of Jews and how “otherworldly” it seems. Lastly, with all the complaining we here about the jews and their stranglehold on media, finance and other social sytems, do you really think that websites devoted to the same old recycled , academic, predictable, polished, politically correct guff is going to have any effect on the monoply that is now the full gamut of the Jew? 34coupe Next entry: Presentation and the problem of extremis Previous entry: No Global Age, only globalised greed |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. HoroSmutS commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) zhrcwuwmkq commented in entry 'The end of Mel Gibson's career?' on 05/23/12, 11:46 PM. (go) (view) SEO Services commented in entry 'The Cubans of Miami' on 05/23/12, 11:11 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) xiaolily commented in entry 'Maltese Incident' on 05/23/12, 10:12 PM. (go) (view) Cockouche commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 09:40 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) assundaGymn commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/23/12, 08:41 PM. (go) (view) GlablePax commented in entry 'University official sentenced for child porn, blackmail' on 05/23/12, 08:23 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) cuiseur automatique seb commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/23/12, 07:43 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:23 PM. (go) (view) 7 Year BA commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 09:19 PM. (go) (view) DARYL commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 08:57 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 08:31 PM. (go) (view) Church of Jed commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 07:40 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 05:56 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 11:37 AM. (go) (view) AnalogMan commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 11:29 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:42 AM. (go) (view) Srakotraqu commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 07:30 AM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 07:19 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 06:26 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/22/12, 02:34 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Darren on May 17, 2008, 01:08 PM | #
One of the things that always strikes me is the hypocrisy of the Jewish community. They will stand behind all other people except normal and healthy gentile whites. They’ll rally behind minorities that are perceived to be oppressed. They’re already shouting “hurrah!” at the recent court decision in CA legalizing gay marriage.
When is the last time the ADL, SPLC, or any other group of organized and self-identified activist Jews have stood up for normal and healthy whites? Never.
Jews refuse to be criticized. When people like MacDonald cite factual historical data about Jewish group behavior, it is anti-Semitism. When a Jewish professor of sociology talks about “white skin privilege”, it is scholarly! When you call them out on this double standard, again you’re called an anti-Semite.