Kai:Europia::C.C.:grin

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 03:29 AM | #

God bless you Kai, comrade!

Posted by torgrim on January 19, 2009, 10:40 AM | #

I second, Fred Scrooby’s sentiments, also!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 11:38 AM | #

Ominous news from the Irish front:

Migration Watch Ireland has had its site taken down after being referred to the police.  Quoting Politics.ie,

“It seems they fell foul of the Nigerian Candidate, one Frances Soney-Ituen, who is standing in the Locals in Athy, Co. Kildare, next June, who complained to the local Leinster Leader… When this Site didn’t come up with an answer to their liking quick enough it looks like somebody called in the Garda Internet Unit.  Migration Watch have now issued the following statement, part of which reads as follows: 

” ‘This afternoon we were contacted by official authorities and asked to provide a full explanation of our website and names and addresses of Migration Watch staff, and the details of our suppliers of information and posters.  We were also asked to remove the links to our Election Watch section.  We have since refused the request, and disposed of such information.’ ”

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/01/18/irish-eyes-not-smiling/

Did everyone see in that where the authorities demanded not just names and addresses of blog staff, but “details” of the site’s commentariat (“posters”) as well?  That’s new, as far as I know:  they want to know who the site’s commenters are. 

So, the other side are determined to play hardball rather than wisely take a step back, at this juncture when tempers are, yes, liable to flare, and unplug their ears for once to what immigration critics are saying. 

They’ve apparently decided to try to crush rather than listen at this extremely sensitive, some might say potentially explosive, juncture.

If so, and they one day find themselves deciding in retrospect they should’ve perhaps listened instead of playing hardball, they won’t be the first to ... rue certain unwise decisions taken that, once taken, can’t be undone ....

Posted by skeptical on January 19, 2009, 11:45 AM | #

I intellectually believe that Kai Murros is correct here; it should be impossible to eradicate an entire race of humanity, along with its history, without some kind of bestial blowback.

At the same time, I hope he is correct.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 12:04 PM | #

He’s a Finn, Skeptical.  Military experts have judged the Finns the toughest, most ferocious fighters of World War II.  A handful of thousands of them would hold off entire army corps tens of thousands strong firing far heavier weapons.  Have you heard of the Finnish Winter War hero who was nick-named “The White Death” by the Soviet Russians who tried to invade?  As the greatest wartime sniper in history he picked off some five hundred of the enmey, often at ranges of 400-500 yards, over the space of something like seven months.  While in combat against the Russian communists, in his sniper position, “The White Death” took a high-powered round in the face which penetrated deep then turned out to be an explosive round, blowing his head and face open like a burst melon (when you see photos of him at age 90 you see how his face got re-arranged from that) then, keeping his cool, stalked and killed the Russian sniper who’d done that to him, and went on to survive.  There was that story “A Finn” told us, where a Finn Winter War soldier was out in the woods training a company of Swedish volunteers when suddenly the Soviets showed up and all the Swedes ran away, leaving this Finn alone.  He instantly picked up a sub-machine gun, literally went into a berserk-like mental state, sort of a trance, and single-handedly mowed down some dozens of Russians, pushinig back their offensive and surviving.  When you invade or try to annihilate Finland, YOU LOSE.  That’s the persepective Kai is speaking from.

Posted by skeptical on January 19, 2009, 12:18 PM | #

Scrooby,

Thank you for sharing your account of the WWII Finnish hero dubbed “The White Death” (sounds rather apt).

When you invade or try to annihilate Finland, YOU LOSE.  That’s the persepective Kai is speaking from.

Ah, hmm, well to the extent that their primordial spirit remains then I am confident that at least the Finns will make it through this dark time.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 12:38 PM | #

Put it this way, Skeptical, if anyone will, they will.  Finns ARE NOT push-overs.

Posted by Britannia on January 19, 2009, 12:46 PM | #

Yeah it’s also a bonus that the Finns are still armed to the teeth.  They’re bloody good drivers too…it takes 3 years to pass your test and receive a full license in Finland.  As for some of the other countries in Europe, I’m not so sure…England is 35% non white and the people willing to reverse the process are few and far between.  I have confidence in the Scandinavian and Eastern Europeans nations turning back the tide but the Western Europeans have become soft and our nations have been disarmed.  Perhaps the indigenous population will change it’s tune when they see how those nations that do eject their non-whites prosper in the long run.  Perhaps they’ll help us out and invade.  I’d be the first to sign up for a new Waffen SS unit if they did

Posted by skeptical on January 19, 2009, 01:06 PM | #

Britannia,

...England is 35% non white…

Good God!  I thought that figure was more in range of 10-15%

To put things in perspective, America is roughly 35-50% non-White, with all of her major cities as being completely alien.

Posted by skeptical on January 19, 2009, 01:07 PM | #

Whoops, I mean America is roughly 35-40% non-White.

Posted by Britannia on January 19, 2009, 01:22 PM | #

Yeah unfortunately, the 10-15% figure is for the UK as a whole and Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland are not as affected.  England gets the bulk of the immigration and it’s predicted that we will start seeing the first majority non-white cities as of next year!  I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they’ve been passing anti “hate” speech laws like crazy over the past decade.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 01:47 PM | #

Here’s that story A Finn told:

- Sweden can be thought as nation with weak immune system. Before the war it was strenghtening with ethnic nationalism, racialism and eugenics. Leftists advocated these, but without enough time to grow deep roots and traditions, leftism in wrong environment could mutate to dangerous form. The war result broke the good development too soon. The bad influences were:

1) Swedes feared immensely the Soviets. To give you an example; During war some Swedish volunteers came to Finland to fight. Over 100 of them had been in training some time and Viljam Pylkäs was training them one day. Suddenly Finnish scout comes and informs that 110-115 Soviets are coming. Swedes start to scream and run in panic to all directions, except towards Soviets. Pylkäs and other man gather all the clips and ammunitions. Pylkäs orders the man to fill those clips that are empty or become empty. Soviets come and battle ensues. Pylkäs shoots frenzied, accurate murderous short sets of fire. When it is over, 83 Soviets lay dead, the rest of them escaped. The escaped Swedes had to be sent to Sweden. This kind of fear was prevalent in their society. They knew that if Soviet Union conquers them, it is the end of Swedes, literally. Controlled fear might be good servant, but fear is evil master and gives wrong counsel. This made them subordinate in mental level too much to Soviets after the war. Finns played more political games, despite the pressure and threat being much harder on the Finns.

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/sunics_ihomo_americanus_i_and_the_american_psychological_commonweal/P100/#c47893

Posted by James Bowery on January 19, 2009, 02:03 PM | #

There seems to be a bifurcation of views of great moment here:

1) Await the Second Coming.
2) The Second Coming has always been, and will always be, a “coming” attraction awaited only by fools or cowards.

I don’t have an answer as to which is more accurate but I will say that I was more prone to #2 before the bailout mania further centralized wealth.  The main argument for #2 now is that Obama will so trash the economy that government “jobs” will consist of ideological compliance in exchange for the only source of subsistence.  Its a gambit that Obama can pull if if anyone can… but if he fails in the gambit…

Posted by skeptical on January 19, 2009, 02:32 PM | #

James Bowery,

In my insignificant opinion, stoking the minds of our people while waiting on (1) is our only real option.  The perspective suggested by option (2) is just so much bluster at this point, perhaps such could’ve been reasonably entertained a few decades ago, but not now.

What we need is an organic [bestial] reaction to the fact that we are being replaced everywhere, what Kai is predicting and what would seem intellectually inevitable given the circumstances, such a reaction would provide the kind of sociological raw material that our movements now lack, and which can’t be manufactured out of thin air by a few intellectual dissidents.

If the Western societal collective were to have a conscious mind, as embodied by our academic & information organs, then it would be fair to say this faculty has fallen under a kind of daemon possession.  Capturing our conscious mind is one thing, but capturing an unconscious mind which has been formed by many eons of existence is something else; it has always been within the secret chamber of our collective biological unconscious mind that we have hoped for hidden resources that will manifest themselves when the question of our very existence is forced upon us.  That the unconscious mind will always choose Life even if the conscious mind is committed to Death.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2009, 10:06 PM | #

Prof. MacDonald explains what’s going on without invoking any miasmas whatsoever (no po-mo liberalism as the culprit, no managerialism), only specific agents of self-interest, ones which can be named, studied, countered, and overcome:

A huge problem for white people is lack of intellectual and cultural confidence. [...]

This lack of cultural confidence is no accident.  For nearly 100 years whites have been subjected to a culture of critique emanating from the most prestigious academic and media institutions.

The only significant group of white people with any cultural confidence centers itself around country music, NASCAR, and the small town values of traditional white America. [...]

This is what I term implicit whiteness — implicit because explicit assertions of white identity have been banned by the anti-white elites that dominate our politics and culture.  It is a culture that, as Hsu notes, “cannot speak its name.”

But that implies that the submerged white identity of the white working class and the lack of cultural confidence exhibited by the rest of white America are imposed from outside.  Although there may well be characteristics of whites that facilitate this process, this suppression of white identity and interests is certainly not the natural outcome of modernization or any other force internal to whites as a people.  In my opinion, they are the result of the successful erection of a culture of critique in the West dominated by Jewish intellectual and political movements.

The result is that educated, intellectually insecure white people these days are far more likely to believe in the utopian future described by Hsu than in hard and cautious thinking about what the future might have in store for them.

It’s worth dwelling a bit on the intellectual insecurity of the whites who mindlessly utter the mantras of multiculturalism that they have soaked up from the school system and from the media.  Most people do not have much confidence in their intellectual ability and look to elite opinion to shape their beliefs.  As I noted elsewhere,

“A critical component of the success of the culture of critique is that it achieved control of the most prestigious and influential institutions of the West, and it became a consensus among the elites, Jewish and non-Jewish alike.  Once this happened, it is not surprising that this culture became widely accepted among people of very different levels of education and among people of different social classes.

“Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability.  But they know that the professors at Harvard, and the editorial page of the New York Times and the Washington Post, and even conservative commentators like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are all on page when it comes to racial and ethnic issues.  This is a formidable array, to the point that you almost have to be a crank to dissent from this consensus.

“I think one of the greatest triumphs of the left has been to get people to believe that people who assert white identity and interests or who make unflattering portrayals of organized Jewish movements are morally degenerate, stupid, and perhaps psychiatrically disturbed.  Obviously, all of these adjectives designate low status.”

The reality is that the multicultural emperor has no clothes and, because of its support for racial Zionism and the racialism of ethnic minorities in America, it is massively hypocritical to boot.  The New York Times, the academic left, and the faux conservatives that dominate elite discourse on race and ethnicity are intellectually bankrupt and can only remain in power by ruthlessly suppressing or ignoring the scientific findings.

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html#Hsu

Posted by Loriver on January 22, 2009, 09:58 AM | #

Very good video. He has the heart of a normal man, not someone who is indifferent to his own replacement by aliens. It is sad that we can not see and hear more from such men, in public and on television as well as on the internet.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 02:12 AM | #

A French blog reacts to the bizarre outbreak of orgasmic European Obamania:

Ces Occidentaux qui bandent devant l’épiderme mélaniné d’Obama sont des esclaves.  En prétendant évacuer la race, ils ont créé la plus racialiste des époques.  Ils ont jeté la croix gammée loin, très loin, elle leur est revenue en pleine gueule comme un boomerang.  Ils ont mis sur pied la mécanique d’un suicide ethnique blanc.  Un monde où le bronzé est la finalité de toutes les finalités.  Il est ontologiquement supérieur.  Il est ce vers quoi nous devons tous tendre, ce vers quoi l’univers lui-même doit converger.  Il est l’idole ultime des nouveaux inquisiteurs.

Ces gens ne sont en rien affranchis de la race, ils sont au contraire obsédés par elle.  Ils se réjouissent ici et là de leur propre disparition.  Très bruyamment qui plus est.  Ils s’épanouissent dans un monde où la blancheur est une maladie.  Cette parade, bien qu’elle ait quelque chose d’effrayant, est riche d’enseignements. (…)

http://www.fdesouche.com/articles/22470

These Westerners who swoon over Obama’s pigmented skin are slaves.  Seeing themselves as getting rid of race, they’ve created instead the most racialist of epochs.  They’ve thrown away the swastika, throwing it so far that it’s turned around like a boomerang and stricken them right in the face.  They’ve set in motion a process of white race suicide.  A world where someone with brown skin is the absolute, unchallenged be all and end all; something ontologically superior; that toward which we must all strive; that upon which the universe itself must converge.  It’s the ultimate idol of the New Inquisitors.

In no way have these people shaken race off; quite the contrary, they’re obsessed with it.  Everywhere do they rejoice over their own extinction.  And very noisily, too.  They blossom in a world where whiteness is a disease.  Though this spectacle conceals something frightening, it is rich with lessons [...]

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 04:27 PM | #

The New World Order assured everyone Rhodesia’s blacks would be soooooo much better off under Mugabe than Ian Smith.  They prevailed and here’s part of the result:

http://misswelby.blogspot.com/2009/01/lo-zimbabwe-introduce-la-banconota-da.html

The log entry at the link says,

“Last week the [Chimpbabwe] Central Bank placed in circulation the 10, 20, and 50 billion Chimpbabwe dollar banknotes, but it’s already not enough.  An official estimate put the inflation rate at 231,000,000% in July, but some experts claimed it was much higher.  Moreover, 100 trillion dollar banknotes are planned [...].”

The inflation rate quoted there is only to the 8th power of 10, too low by nine orders of magnitude according to what I’ve read (someone at the Cato Institute, I believe it was, calculated Chimpbabwe’s inflation rate the other month at something on the order of ten to the 21st power).

It’s the same New World Order that did this to Chimpbabwe that’s trying its best to do the exact same thing to us:  reduce us to appalling poverty ...

http://misswelby.blogspot.com/2009/01/monetary-union-has-left-half-of-europe.html

... while Jewish oligarchs fresh from fleeing their former host, Russia, for their new host, the West, walk off with trillions in their pockets after robbing everyone blind they can get their hands on: 

http://misswelby.blogspot.com/2009/01/browns-fury-at-royal-bank-of-scotlands.html

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 05:20 PM | #

“too low by nine orders of magnitude”

Excuse me, thirteen orders of magnitude (21 minus 8)

So, ten to the eighth is too low by thirteen orders of magnitude ... Those good old (fill in the blank) ______ , they really know how to royally screw a country they dislike, don’t they.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 06:11 PM | #

Takuan turns out to be a complete dud, after initially with his earlier essays giving the appearance of substance.  A doctor who throws his hands up and babbles about what are the equivalent of miasmas, as Takuan does in his latest offering; a doctor who can only describe symptoms without ever discovering causes, is of zero help to the sick.  The sick might as well call the undertaker as call such a doctor.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3762

BrusselsJournal.com showed promise as a cutting-edge blog.  That’s showed.  Past tense.  I read it less and less ...... and less ................ and less .......................................................

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2009, 06:19 PM | #

In the comments thread underneath Takuan’s piece, “One Cent” writes,

“Gutting the blatant lefty MSM would be the my first choice in taking back western culture.”

It’s not a matter of the MSM being “lefty,” it’s a matter of it being Jewish.  That’s where the problem is coming from. 

That’s where the “lefty” problem in general is coming from. 

It’s a Jewish, not a “lefty,” problem.

Posted by Diamed on January 24, 2009, 07:05 PM | #

I also read that last piece with great interest.  I keep expecting Seiyo to pull a rabbit out of his magic hat at the end of the essay, give some real lasting impact with the weight of his intellect and readership, but then it just lags off into incoherence.

Seiyo is lost because he does not yet realize that a nation’s politics, culture, values, and everything else is a reflection of the nation’s ethnicity.  Like a moon rising over a still lake, culture is the beautiful mirror of the genetic sky—but is NEVER THE SKY.  Every single problem he lists (and there are a great many) would become petty and inconsequential if the European people were given back power over their own lives.  This means kicking out all non-whites, and furthermore rejecting all thinking that has arisen from non-whites, as fundamentally unsuited for a European soul.  After this initial drastic measure to restore stability to the cosmos a steady program of eugenics can work out the remaining problems in our lives, with the power of the state to enforce culture and the power of culture supporting the state.  The state in turn serves the gene pool, the children.  It is not about a personality cult, nor about the structure of government or the current holders of power within the government, it is about creating an environment amenable to our own genes and genes amenable to crafting ever-higher environments.  When I think for ten seconds about what incredible, wonderful things we could do as a united people striving to better ourselves, I get a sense of holy warmth and joy radiating through me.  While Seiyo is raving about how bad things are, I can already look ahead to how good things could be!

There is nothing, nothing at all keeping us from making the future better than anything that came before us.  We have wealth, science, knowledge, numbers, military might, land, and the European Soul, that bright being that gifts us with our innate values and virtues no one else has.  Every new generation of white children comes to us purely European, purely ourselves, the moment we seize power everything will be restored to its natural state like waking from a bad dream.  The children will never know anything like it even happened, they’ll be born into the natural state of the world, grow up as they were naturally meant to grow, and become what they’ve always naturally striven for, from start to finish!  What a beautiful gift we offer our kids!  And by God, what a beautiful gift our kids offer us, the chance to renew ourselves and our world every twenty years.  Who can look upon such a future and feel anything but hope?  What is with Seiyo’s despair?  Out with ye, foul demon!  This is the arena for brave men.  This is the time for white warriors.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 25, 2009, 02:23 AM | #

A comrade who has posted in MR.com’s comments threads signing as “A Finn” analyses the current very aggressive attack by the Finnish media .......(uhhhh ..... better change that to “Finnish” media, in quote marks) ..... OK, where was I?  Oh yes — analyses the current very aggressive attack by ... the “Finnish” ... media on normal Finnish society and on the completely normal, minimally and reasonably “nationalist,” “patriotic” sentiments, instincts, and conventions (such as a disposition not to change the society’s race from white to Negro) that are part of normal society in Finland and everywhere else. 

Where is this attack on these normal aspects of society coming from?  Who, exactly, is mounting this assault on normalness and on good societal health and happiness?  Is it coming from “post-modern liberalism,” or from James Burnham’s and Sam Francis’s “managerialism,” or perhaps from some other similarly vague miasma-like natural “influence” or “force” that no one can pin down or do anything about because things have simply “evolved” that way, out of anyone’s control, and we’ll just have to “wait” until things “evolve” in some other, hopefully healthier, direction? 

Is that what’s going on with these attacks? 

You be the judge as to where this unprovoked and very carefully targeted attack is coming from (hint:  blind “forces of nature” like hurricanes, earthquakes, epidemics, and miasmas don’t target their attacks this carefully, I’m sorry — they don’t calculate, manipulate, evade, dissimulate, and take precise aim in this way, only minds do that ...):

Read:

http://mosaisk.com/Torben-Lund/Finland-Politics-Immigration-Jews.php
______

(Hat tip:  http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2009/01/17/question-and-answer/#comment-34341 )

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 25, 2009, 02:31 AM | #

Got an e-mail asking what I meant by posting this:

It’s not a matter of the MSM being “lefty,” it’s a matter of it being Jewish.  That’s where the problem is coming from. 

That’s where the “lefty” problem in general is coming from. 

It’s a Jewish, not a “lefty,” problem.

Here’s what I meant, in a nutshell:  There are many ways to be “left.”  There’s a life-to-Euros way and a death-to-Euros way.  The Jews always choose the death-to-Euros way.  So it’s a Jewish problem, not a “lefty” problem.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 25, 2009, 03:17 PM | #

The links here,

http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2009/01/17/question-and-answer/#comment-34341 ,

and the myriad further links embedded all through the texts at the web-pages linked, will provide a huge education, if there is need of one, as to an immensely important aspect of what’s truly going on behind the scenes.

There are important links.  Store them if necessary.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 28, 2009, 09:40 PM | #

Ian Jobling’s newly-revamped site, WhiteAmerica.us, has a forum.  In it, someone asks what has caused the U.S.‘s racial decline:

http://whiteamerica.us/forum/showthread.php?t=158

Some of the replies to this question are good, for example “Breakneck’s” (reply # 11) while at least one is preposterous:  Ian’s (# 8).  Ian says we did it to ourselves as a result of a cosmopolitan streak present since the early days of the country.  In support of this view he cites a book Proze has often cited, The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America:

http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Fall-Anglo-America-Eric-Kaufmann/dp/0674013034/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1232747248&sr=8-6

I never read books like that because my nerves aren’t steady enough.  You need nerves of steel to read stuff like that.  Reading stuff like that would put me in a bad mood for who knows how long?  Just glancing at a randomly chosen page of the damn thing can have that effect on me.

Here’s an Amazon/com review of it.  As Jobling alludes to, it says the WASPs did it to themselves.  (See what I mean about this stuff putting you in a really bad mood?) 

Review

Eric Kaufmann’s The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America will make an important contribution to the long-sustained debate over the nature and distinctiveness of American identity and American nationality.  Kaufmann forcefully and effectively locates the significant moving power that has transformed the United States from a society with a single dominant ethnic group, into one that is clearly something else, in the powerful central ideas that were present at the origins of American society.

—Nathan Glazer, Harvard University

Many of Kaufmann’s arguments and reinterpretations of historical periods are original.  They will provoke discussion and criticism but in the process will advance our understanding of American national identity.  He brings an original and fresh perspective to bear on the formation, content, and meaning of this identity.

—Desmond King, author of Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy

Illuminating…Mr. Kaufmann shows how the culture of “white Anglo-Saxon protestants,” or Wasps, was constructed and, from the early 20th century, gradually dismantled.

—Christopher Caldwell (Financial Times)

[A] compelling study…Kaufmann writes with admirable detachment and objectivity, and reveals the mechanism by which the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant founders of the U.S. lost their political and cultural dominance.  Kaufmann shows how a longstanding cosmopolitan element within Wasp ideology shifted from a symbolic role to the core of national life, and the Wasp population recast their own role accordingly.  In other words, they did it to themselves...It is so refreshing to read a generous, open and positive book on this subject—what a pity that it is Huntington who has attracted the attention.

—Nicholas Cull (Times Higher Education Supplement)

Product Description

As the 2000 census resoundingly demonstrated, the Anglo-Protestant ethnic core of the United States has all but dissolved.  In a country founded and settled by their ancestors, British Protestants now make up less than a fifth of the population.  This demographic shift has spawned a “culture war” within white America.  While liberals seek to diversify society toward a cosmopolitan endpoint, some conservatives strive to maintain an American ethno-national identity.  Eric Kaufmann traces the roots of this culture war from the rise of WASP America after the Revolution to its fall in the 1960s, when social institutions finally began to reflect the nation’s ethnic composition.

Kaufmann begins his account shortly after independence, when white Protestants with an Anglo-Saxon myth of descent established themselves as the dominant American ethnic group.  But from the late 1890s to the 1930s, liberal and cosmopolitan ideological currents within white Anglo-Saxon Protestant America mounted a powerful challenge to WASP hegemony.  This struggle against ethnic dominance was mounted not by subaltern immigrant groups but by Anglo-Saxon reformers, notably Jane Addams and John Dewey.  It gathered social force by the 1920s, struggling against WASP dominance and achieving institutional breakthrough in the late 1960s, when America truly began to integrate ethnic minorities into mainstream culture.

So, John Dewey (a real asshole, by the way) and someone named Jame Addams did it.  Mystery solved!  Stuff like the group who pushed the 1965 immigration law for all they were worth for forty years had strictly nothing to do with it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 29, 2009, 12:07 AM | #

People don’t like Jewish open-borders propaganda but the Jews won’t stop filling their

newspapers

rags with it, even if it means being forced to shut the

newspapers

rags down for lack of readership:

http://www.vdare.com/gadiel/090128_slim_times.htm

For Jews, opening Euro borders while keeping Jewish borders shut tight is a religion.  It functions as, in effect, part of the Jewish religion.  When you battle the Jews who go around prying open the borders of Eurosphere countries you’re, in effect, for all practical purposes, battling the Jewish religion.  Before you know it, the Jews come swarming out of their hive at you in unison, like all the demons in hell, trying to sting you to death.

Posted by Armor on January 29, 2009, 08:05 AM | #

Ian Jobling’s song: “we did it to ourselves”

He could argue that Jewish influence may not have been decisive.
In any case, why would he justify the dominant position of the Jews in the media and in politics? Can’t he see there is something wrong with a foreign minority having a dominant position? What’s wrong with the idea of putting an end to that?

Posted by Darren on January 29, 2009, 05:28 PM | #

New York, NY, January 29, 2009 … American Jews overwhelmingly supported Israel in its actions against Hamas in Gaza, according to a national survey conducted for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The findings strongly contradict the notion that surfaced during the war in Gaza that American Jews were divided in their attitudes, with suggestions that many were critical of Israel.

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/5455_62.htm

Doesn’t this basically refute Jobling’s assertion that Jews aren’t ethnocentric and blow his entire argument about American Jews being liberal and anti-Israel out of the water?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 04, 2009, 12:57 AM | #

In a comment, I wrote,

“People don’t like Jewish open-borders propaganda but the Jews won’t stop filling their newspapers with it, even if it means being forced to shut the rags down for lack of readership”

The New York Times is, of course, a Jewish newspaper, part of what I call the Jewish press.  It’s owned and run by Eurochristian-hating Jews and therefore deliberately publishes what’s hateful to normal Eurochristians.  It’s on the ropes financially but still the Jews who own and run it won’t stop using it to spread open-borders propaganda, propaganda which enough white people hate to drive its circulation way down.  Joe Guzzardi, while not saying anything about which ethnic group’s interests The New York Times serves and which it attacks, echoes my view above, that this low sheet’s owners and staff would rather go bankrupt than drop its fanatical open borders advocacy, and Joe calls for what amounts to a boycott of the rag and its opinions, something I’ve been advocating for years (why does anybody on our side still read that obnoxious Jewish sheet???  why does anyone on our side even acknowledge its existence???):

“If you were to ask me which I think would happen first, the Times reporting fairly about immigration or declaring bankruptcy and ceasing publication, I would bet on the latter.”

“Effective immediately, let’s all agree to ignore the New York Times.  Simply stated, it is unrealistic to expect that we can influence the Times to write without bias–or even responsibly– about immigration.”

It’s long overdue for everyone on our side to ignore the Jew York Times, pretend it doesn’t existence.  Don’t refer to it, don’t quote it, don’t cite it, don’t buy or read it.  It’s a moral black hole.  Why pay attention to a low sheet that advocates the destruction of everything civilized and all that you and I hold dear in this life?  Why give it publicity?  Why help it by so much as acknowledging its miserable little Jewish Eurochristian-hating existence?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 04, 2009, 12:59 AM | #

The Joe Guzzardi link (see above):

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/02/03/ignoring-the-new-york-times-and-moving-on/

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 04, 2009, 02:03 AM | #

Good Eurochristian folk, oppressed by genocidal Jews, are starting to awaken, if not to the Jews who are behind the genocide, at least to its calculated nature which they are finally seeing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1Fvt_flWgI&eurl=http://www.fdesouche.com/

Why talk about “the Jews”?  Here’s why:  show me one Jewish organization that’s not head-and-shoulders above all other groups in the forefront of the most fanatical open-borders advocacy and its associated oppression and genocide of Eurochristian folk.

Posted by Audient on February 04, 2009, 05:26 AM | #

Fred Scrooby,

For about 10 days now, the “The Civic Platform.com has been unaccessible from the Bastardstate.

I have tried access through a couple of anonymizers, but to no avail.

Is it perhaps offline?

Cheers,

Audient.

Posted by Armor on February 04, 2009, 07:32 AM | #

The New York Times is on the ropes financially but still the Jews who own and run it won’t stop using it to spread open-borders propaganda, propaganda which enough white people hate to drive its circulation way down. (—Fred Scrooby)

The same is true of the Republican Party. They have to attract more white voters in order to remain in existence. So, they should start accepting the defense of white ethnic interests as a legitimate concern. But instead of that, they have recently chosen a black chairman who favors affirmative genocide against the whites.

Posted by shark on February 04, 2009, 07:51 AM | #

FS: The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America was written by one Eric Kaufmann - who is presumably a Jew (Kaufmann = very common Jewish surname).  Which of course means it is likely full of anti-Anglo American bias/prejudice on some level, correct?  Can the book be trusted as a reliable source if it’s written by a Jew?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 04, 2009, 10:32 AM | #

Audient, it’s not just Jewrmany — I haven’t been able pull it in here either (the States).  I don’t know what’s going on — I hope all’s well with FB. 

Armor, excellent point.  I touched on roughly the same point the other day at Proze’s, here

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/01/30/michael-steele/#comment-8411

and here

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/01/30/michael-steele/#comment-8430 .

Shark asks two questions:

”[If the book’s author is Jewish it] means it is likely full of anti-Anglo American bias/prejudice on some level, correct?”

Correct.  It’s not certain to be, but the likelihood of it literally overwhelms all other possible outcomes, so that in reading such a book you have to be very much on your guard mentally.

“Can the book be trusted as a reliable source if it’s written by a Jew?”

To answer this I’d have to have read it, which, as I’ve said, my nerves aren’t steady enough for.  I might go into a bad mood for the rest of my life if I read that, something I don’t want.  But Proze has read it, and at one point cited it fairly often at his blog (this was a while ago).  He might be able to answer your question.

Posted by Audient on February 04, 2009, 11:44 AM | #

For whoever is interested in Cointelpro today, this report will make for some fascinating reading (via cryptome.org)

White Supremacist Recruitment of Military Personnel since 9/11

7 July 2008

Prepared by
FBI
Counterterrorism Division

http://cryptome.org/spy-whites.pdf

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 05, 2009, 03:50 AM | #

A free online book many may want to have a look at:

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/index.html#Contents .

I’m reading it.  It expresses doubt that modern humans evolved in Africa.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 08, 2009, 01:33 AM | #

Over at Snouck’s:

DEATH THREATS ABOUND IN THE NETHERLANDS

Prosecuting Geert Wilders

The Amsterdam Court of Appeals has ordered the prosecution of MP Geert Wilders, responding to complaints made by various persons listed by Het Vrije Volk.  The lawyer who issued the compaint on their behalf is Mr. Gerard Spong.  A prominent member of the group is Mr. Els Spong, a member of the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA).

The public reaction

The Dutch press now reports that two members of this group have received many death threats.  The death threats have come both from Dutchmen and from other European countries.

First Mr. Gerard Spong informed the press that he had received threatening phone calls and e-mails.

And now also Mr. Els Lucas is receiving these threats.

Mr. Gerard Spong has requested body guards from the Dutch authorities.  The police have promised to send people to guard the lawyer.

Geert Wilders has denounced the threats against Mr. Spong.

Society is splintering

The issuing of death threats against those who seek to surpress Wilders shows how strong Geert Wilders’ base is and how Dutch and European society is fragmenting as a result of Multicultural policies.

( http://snouck.blogspot.com/2009/02/death-threats-abound-in-netherlands.html ; the original text contains several embedded links)

A reader comments:

European governments have brought this on themselves by long appeasing radical Muslims and other criminal elements at the expense of their own law-abiding, tax-paying citizens.  The Dutch government arrested Geert Wilders out of “respect” for Islam.  Maybe when Dutch people start cutting off heads they’ll get some respect too.

Dave

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 08, 2009, 01:54 AM | #

More from Snouck on Dutch society’s fragmentation thanks to multiculturalism:

DUTCH POLITICS IS HOLLOWING OUT FURTHER

What do the polls say about the backing of the Dutch political parties?

This blog has pointed several times to the increasing fragmentation of the Dutch political landscape.  The large centre parties are losing voters.  Parties with a stronger ideological profile are attracting more and more voters.  The process is illustrated by the regular voter opinion polls.

The latest poll is from peil.nl from February first.  [link in the original text]

The biggest two parties

Traditionally the Christian Democrats (CDA) have the biggest share of votes, followed by Labour (PvdA).  The CDA has dropped to its lowest point since opinion polls were first taken in 1952.  The Dutch Parliament has 150 seats, and the CDA would receive 28 seats based on current polls.  The PvdA would take 26.

The rest

There are now four parties which have between 20 and 28 seats.  Another two parties have between 15 and 20 seats.  Basically this means that no party has a strong core of voters that really stand by their party and agree with its ideology.  They can lose their function as intermediaries between society and politics.

Repercussions

Furthermore, this fragmentation means it will get more and more difficult to built majority coalitions that can govern.  Coalitions will be unstable, due to the fact that they have to be put together from three or four parties.

Will the gains of Geert Wilders be timely?

Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party has grown to 23 seats in the polls.  This is due to his prosecution for hate speech against Islam.  Whether the effect of this prosecution will still be noticeble late in 2010 when the next elections are to be held remains to be seen.

( http://snouck.blogspot.com/2009/02/dutch-politics-is-hollowing-out-further.html )

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 09, 2009, 11:50 PM | #

Fjordman is now unmistakably talking about race and race-replacement (though he nowhere uses those specific words):

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3790

FJ, I warmly embrace you with both arms.  You’re back where you belong now.  You’ve finally come home! 

Welcome home, comrade!

Posted by Norman Lowell on March 08, 2009, 07:41 AM | #

Always a pleasure to hear Kai Murros.
So genteel, professorial - yet tough as leather.
A intellectual with a sound ideological underpinning.

I hope Kai Murros contests the June 09 European Elections.
Finland and the whole of Europe, needs such Men.
We, the New Right need to wrest control in Brussels.

Zarathustra left his mountain top and went down to the valley.
There is work to be done, there.
We must reclaim the market place.

We must “awaken the beast within us”.
Discard two thousand years of poison and lies.
Pick up the sword and drive out the invader - and slay the traitors.

Rebirth, regeneration and instauration can only come through Brussels.
A New Right group : Nova Europa.
2012 : 21st Dec - ushering Imperium Europa.

Norman Lowell

Posted by Guessedworker on March 08, 2009, 08:34 AM | #

Fred,

Does FJ pass the three tests Peter Hitchens fails?

1. Does he defend our blood (or is he a culturalist)?

2. Does he understand that Jewish ethno-aggression plays a role in the European crisis?

3. Does he believe that nationalists who do defend blood and who do comprehend the Jewish Question are all evil proto-Nazis?

He may be alright on No.3.  No.1 is very questionable.  No.2, not a chance.

I wouldn’t welcome him home yet.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 08, 2009, 12:00 PM | #

GW, if I have time later I’ll go through FJ’s essay and excerpt those parts which I interpreted as his homecoming — but I do see what you mean in that comment just above:  maybe you’re partly right.

Regarding Norman Lowell’s poem/comment just above GW’s post, wouldn’t it be GREAT if men of intellect on our side, such as Kai Murros, a Finn, Jonathan Bowden, Guessedworker, CvH, and others, did as Lowell has done and ran for a seat in the belly of the beast, Brussels!  I second Lowell’s comment there:  what about it, Kai?  Have you thought about answering the call to the colors in your people’s time of dire emergency?  Norman’s admonition to “Go to Brussels!” is like Lord Elrond’s admonition to Lord Aragorn, “Take the Dimholt road!”  You’ll be doing what you were made to do, what God clearly has made you for, giving you the gifts to accomplish it.  You have the makings, Kai, to be a champion of your people.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 08, 2009, 07:05 PM | #

GW, here’s where I thought FJ was clearly talking about race and race-replacement (without once using either of those specific terms), he who traditionally talks only about the Moslem threat:

The English language once conquered the world. Now the rest of the world is conquering the English-speaking countries.  If current trends continue, people in Singapore will know English while the nation that created the English language will cease to exist.

[...] a British woman was arrested because of a supposedly “racist” doll she kept in her window.  In al-Britannia a Muslim man can claim benefits for children with multiple wives and brag about subduing the country and reducing its traditional inhabitants to second-rate citizens or worse, but you cannot have a “racially insensitive” doll in your own home, at least not if you’re white.

[...] Elderly Brits have to die, with or without “encouragement,” so that the state can afford to pay for all the Nigerians and Bangladeshis who flood the country.  The “welfare state” now means that the natives should watch grandma die because she’s getting old anyway and we need the money to pay Muslims with multiple wives and numerous children so that they can feel comfortable while they colonize the country.

These incidents may seem unrelated, but they are not. Make no mistake about it: Harassing the natives in order to crush them mentally and destroy any ideas they might harbor about defending their country against foreign colonization is a deliberate strategy on the part of the authorities and the ruling Multiculturalist oligarchy, whether you identify this as the British Labour Party or the European Union (both are correct).  Of course, this is about the entire Western world, not just Britain, but Britain is arguably the worst example of all.  I am not aware of arrests for “racist” dolls even in Sweden, Belgium or al-Canada, and they are bad cases of suicidal Multiculturalism.  Britain in 2009 is no longer the nation that gave us Shakespeare, Newton or Adam Smith; it is the world’s largest open-air prison, an enlarged Marxist reeducation camp, a horror story where the authorities wage cultural and demographic warfare against the indigenous people of the country.  The only good news is that I sense that native Britons are getting angrier by the day, and will not go quietly into the night.

[...] It used to be said that trends that start in California today will be evident in the rest of the United States tomorrow.  If this remains true, I guess that means that the United States will soon be a Third World entity.  I see no reason to expect that this decline will stop under the administration of President Obama, who has for a generation been a member of an organization of anti-white Marxists dedicated to hating the majority population of the country.  This only happens in white majority Western countries, since white people have been publicly demonized for so long that many of them believe that they deserve this kind of abuse.

Contrary to the absurd claims about “Eurocentrism,” Europeans are traditionally the least ethnocentric people on the planet [...].

[...A]lthough all Western countries without exception are sinking under the weight of Third World mass immigration and in the process becoming a part of the Third World, they are not sinking equally fast.  With the exception of France, Belgium and possibly the Netherlands and Sweden the English-speaking world is leading the disintegration of the West, ideologically and demographically.  The entire West is sick, but the Anglosphere is sicker than most.  The English-speaking countries still have the most dynamic military traditions of the West, but that counts for little as long as they are used for promoting global Multiculturalism rather than for protecting the home country.

I cannot see that the Anglosphere has more freedom of speech than Continental European countries, either.  The USA with its First Amendment does, which is great (we’ll see what their new President does about that), but al-Canada is plain nuts and Britain is a Multicultural banana republic.  Australia and New Zealand could be a part of Greater China by mid-century.  Maybe they will be more prosperous than France will be as a part of Greater Algeria or the United States as a part of Greater Mexico, but by then they will be Asians, not Westerners.

[...] Yet this cannot explain the actions of the United States, which is still the world’s greatest power although that may not last forever.  There is some form of universal proposition nation idea with roots dating back to the Enlightenment at work here.  It’s the concept that a country is not a nation based on a shared heritage but an abstract entity which can be joined by absolutely anybody, a bit like an enlarged video club.  If you claim that the United States is a “universal” nation and that Hamas-supporting Muslims, with whom Westerners have absolutely nothing in common, can and should be imported to the USA, you are a supporter of the concept of a proposition nation.  This idea will eventually kill the United States as we once knew it.

Western elites are committed post-national Globalists.  The EU oligarchs want to import 50 million Africans, in addition to expanding the open borders of the EU to include Muslim North Africa and the Middle East.  As I’ve documented in my essays, this is a planned destruction of all European and indeed Western nation states through transnational organizations such as the EU and the UN, in cooperation with local Multiculturalists.  There is nothing accidental about this. [...]

Suppose the natives in some Western European countries actually start to seriously resist the organized destruction of their countries, halt mass immigration and reverse Multiculturalism.  How will American authorities and media react to this?  Frankly, I wouldn’t be too surprised if they turn out to be actively hostile to the European natives. [...]

Europeans have learned the wrong lessons from Nazism.  For instance, the European Union is now actively and deliberately promoting Islamic immigration to Europe by the tens of millions, knowing fully well that they will gradually displace the original inhabitants of the continent. [...] The EU is promoting Lebensraum for a new master race in Europe [...].

The EU is [...] an institutionalized attack on the very existence of the native peoples of an entire continent, the most influential and creative civilization in human history. [...]

[...T]he English-speaking world, and the United States in particular, is responsible for championing one of the most dangerous ideas of our time: the proposition nation.  Everybody from Saudi Arabia to Somalia can supposedly be imported to the USA and the American political system should be exported to other cultures, by force if necessary.  The USA is supposed to be a “universal nation,” but there is no such thing.  Under Obama, I fear that the USA will no longer be the land of the free, home of the brave, but rather a global enforcer of non-discrimination and Diversity, the Multicultural Empire. [...]

The European Union is a different kind of Multicultural Empire, although it, too, champions a form of proposition nation.  I suspect that the idea ultimately dates back to some of the worse strands of Enlightenment thought. The French, who to a great extent have created the ideological and bureaucratic basis of the EU, have their own ideas about assimilating people from all around the world.  Those of us who live in Western Europe thus have the misfortune of being exposed to the influence of no less than two Multicultural Empires at the same time.

The “conservative” French President Sarkozy, who praised Arabic as the language of science and high civilization after millions of Frenchmen voted for him in the hope that he would defend France and French culture, has stated that it is a duty for the French to become less French, culturally and genetically, and that the state should aggressively promote this agenda.  The goal of Multiculturalism is to destroy a once-great European nation and turn it into an Islamic-dominated Third World entity.  Make no mistake about it:  This is what Multiculturalists have in store for all of us, if we do not stop them.

( http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3790 )
______

Yes, we see better essays every day of the week at MajorityRights.com and any number of other sites, but this is BrusselsJournal.com, where saying such things out in the open is exceptional or non-existent, apparently either a legal major risk for the site or something that Paul Belien (a Catholic) frowns on, or both.  Or maybe the individual writers themselves frown on it.  However, here he’s saying it, saying race and race-replacement albeit using other terms than those specific ones, and getting his point across.  I had to appaud it, GW.  It was a milestone.  The Islamisation of Europe is bad.  But it’s not the central issue.  The central issue is the loss of the race.  Here, FJ for once is eschewing, at long last, the usual dwelling on Islam as the central issue and FINALLY making race and race-replacement the central issue.  Correct me if I’m wrong.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 08, 2009, 07:08 PM | #

“apparently either a legal major risk for the site ... “  [a few lines from the bottom of my comment just above]

apparently either a major legal risk for the site ...