More on Marine

The Marine effect was in evidence in the first round of voting in France’s 2011 local elections, in which some 2,000 seats are being contested. Historically, Front National, has performed poorly at this level and currently has no councillors. But around 400 Front National candidates will go forward to the second-round run-offs, following a 15% vote share in the first.

Marine does not offer herself as the explanation for this success. Speaking to the Guardian she says that there is an intimacy in her relationship with the French public, who recognise her as separate and distinct from “the self-proclaimed elite running France today”.

Le Pen’s verdict is that France is on the brink of a revolution to rival that of the Arab world. Social injustice, people who can’t make ends meet, a growing gap between rich and poor, and overwhelming disappointment with president Nicolas Sarkozy means France hasn’t been this angry since the storming of the Bastille. “There isn’t that much difference between the French people and the Tunisian people or Egyptian people,” she said. “The French want justice - political justice, democratic justice, social justice - they want an end to double standards and they want some ethics from their political class. The French are suffering. They are permanently being asked to make sacrifices and yet there’s a political-financial caste that is reaping all the benefits of the economic situation and awarding itself endless privileges.

“We’re in a pre-revolutionary situation here. What’s happening today resembles what was happening before the French revolution. I think the desire for a revolution like those on the other side of the Mediterranean exists here. Of course, I’m appealing for a democratic revolution – and that’s also perhaps the role of the Front National – for a peaceful revolution by the ballot box, a patriotic revolution.”

I like this line, not least because it has truth to it. I would like it more if she developed globalisation and its elite interests as the source of the only true racism and intolerance in the West today, which is the racism against and intolerance of Europe’s native peoples. But like the other broadly right-wing success stories around Europe, she seems focussed in this respect solely on the need to avoid the usual hard questions. She insists that neither she nor her party is racist, xenophobic or, of course, anti-Semitic. None of the Semites believe her. As an appeal for votes in a polity where the discourse on racism and anti-Semitism is so profoundly hostile to nationalism this might be necessary. But as a policy of a nationalist party in government it would lead absolutely nowhere. Nonetheless, it seems to be the way forward for now for the right-wing in all the European polities where Moslem demographic dominance is a genuine threat - which it’s not in Britain, in my view.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 08:16 PM in European Nationalism
Comments (8) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Rollory on March 22, 2011, 07:57 AM | #

“She insists that neither she nor her party is racist, xenophobic or, of course, anti-Semitic. None of the Semites believe her. “

That may matter more than her intentions. May be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Wouldn’t be the first time.

” Nonetheless, it seems to be the way forward for now for the right-wing in all the European polities where Moslem demographic dominance is a genuine threat - which it’s not in Britain, in my view.”

Could you clarify this? ‘it seems to be’ - what does? The appeal for votes? You don’t think Moslem demographic dominance is a threat in Britain?

Posted by Anders on March 22, 2011, 03:49 PM | #

Muslim demographic dominance is not a threat in the UK? Are you serious? Figures show that the Muslim demographic is doubling every 12 years, expanding 10 times faster than the rest of the British population.

Posted by wolf on March 22, 2011, 06:51 PM | #

http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/the-rivkin-project-how-globalism-uses-multiculturalism-to-subvert-sovereign-nations/

Posted by Guessedworker on March 22, 2011, 09:27 PM | #

Anders, Rollory,

Race-mixing, particularly via the African male, produces final genetic effects, ending our family lines forever. That is more serious than an expanding Muslim population, in my view. If we have to rid ourselves of the Muslim Other by violence we will do it - but only if we retain our ethnicity.

What proportion of the non-English in England are Muslim? Thirty to forty per cent? To become centred on them is to slip into culturism and probably, also, the unrequited love for the Jew that European nationalists continually declare. No thanks. I’ll take the race route.

Posted by Captainchaos on March 23, 2011, 12:52 AM | #

Race-mixing, particularly via the African male, produces final genetic effects, ending our family lines forever.

The obviousness of this fact, visible at first glimpse of mulattos, would seem to offer a self-contained cauterization of the wound. No one really regards individuals with relatively recent negro admixture as White. Which is why it strikes me as particularly bizarre to characterize mulattos as “English” given their admixture occurred before 1948. By that standard, some two bit mongrel is “English”, but not PF. I guess the Krauts can have him. (????)

Posted by Captainchaos on March 23, 2011, 01:22 AM | #

From an English perspective, Dare’s proposal seems more desirable: siphon of the best Krauts to improve the English genepool and dissolve the Fatherland into its various pre-unification elements. That is, from an English perspective.

If we have to rid ourselves of the Muslim Other by violence we will do it

If the exercise is limited to that it won’t be much of an exercise. The situation gets decidedly more dicey if America and/or Russia decides to intervene. If Russia is invited to intervene, or invites herself, the Soviet-nostalgic Putin clique may well demand their old Eastern European empire as the price of their participation, and then some.

Posted by Wandrin on March 31, 2011, 06:44 PM | #

It is a good line, partly because it’s true and partly because it turns the moral guns on the mainstream politicians which i think is neccessary.

But as a policy of a nationalist party in government it would lead absolutely nowhere

I think nationalists need an inner party and outer party. No one European nationalist party can hope to do what is neccessary and survive the inevitable attack from outside so the outer party strives for power on the basis of (for example) an immigration moratorium (including refugees) and the strict deporting of illegals and if successful sticks to those limits while supporting nationalist parties elsewhere with money and media support. I think it will take a large bloc of the White tribes co-operating together to turn things round.

Posted by Robert Reis on April 04, 2011, 09:16 AM | #

German deserter defends Jews:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362185/Pope-Benedict-XVI-Jews-blame-death-Jesus.html

Next entry: Tectonics and the European revolution

Previous entry: Fun with Jews

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa