|
|
Obama-Osama dramaThe discussion, at MR, of two recent significant events—Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Osama’s death—has been unproductive, needlessly acrimonious and otherwise lackluster. I tried to remedy the situation by leaving a comment as “Try critical thinking,” but it wasn’t of any help. Thus I must now awaken from my slumber and post on the significance of these events, which in my estimation are opportune for leading some fence sitters and naïve individuals into the light. Naturally, Amren, Vdare, Sailer et al. won’t adequately address them. The issues are sufficiently important for me to mull making this a sticky post. It’s difficult to avoid enemy infiltration, especially in an open forum, but civility may result if the discussion is primarily fact-based and detractors exhorted to reciprocate. So here we go. The alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden on May 2, 2011 isn’t independently verifiableThe government/MSM (mainstream media) claim that Navy Seals barged into Osama’s room where he and his wife were staying, unarmed. Osama allegedly made threatening gestures and was shot dead—two bullets did the job. It’s unlikely he was horribly mutilated. When Saddam Hussein’s sons were shot dead, their mutilated bodies were sown up and displayed for the world to see; their remains were not buried for more than a week. But we’ve seen no official pictures of Osama’s dead body, and his remains were disposed off almost right away, in the sea, allowing no independent forensic examination. Independent forensic examination would be crucial here. Consider Josef Mengele; he was hunted by certain ethnics for alleged crimes against humanity. By the time they found Mengele in Latin America, he had apparently died of natural causes, and they verified his putative remains via a forensic analysis of his skull, which was published in a peer-reviewed journal of forensic medicine. The identity of the Navy Seals who went after Osama cannot be revealed. The government/MSM claim that Osama’s young wife was non-critically shot in the process of going after Osama and that the Seals wanted to take her for questioning but one of the helicopters broke and there was no space to take her with them. Osama’s wife was taken into custody by the Pakistani government and she won’t be available for questioning by U.S. authorities as the Pakistani government will be returning her to Yemen! They would let a goldmine of information on Osama, especially as it pertains to understanding the “terrorist mindset,” slip away so easily? The reasons given for not allowing independent verification of Osama’s killing make no senseThe U.S. government allegedly disposed off Osama’s remains in the sea because no country would accept the remains. Why would Pakistan object? Why not some remote U.S. base? Why not bring the body to the U.S., seal it for posterity with preservatives and let it be a reminder to those who would ponder masterminding something like 9/11? Another reason given by the government for disposing off the body in the sea was that they didn’t want Osama’s grave to become a shrine. Similarly, they refuse to release pictures of his dead body to avoid angering Muslim radicals to the boiling point. How likely are these possibilities? When 9/11 occurred, some Muslims leaders expressed skepticism that it was the work of 19 Arabs that were part of a terrorist group calling itself Al Qaeda (literally translating to “the toilet,” not “the base”), which was led by Osama bin Laden. Here are the results from a 2008 international survey where people were asked to state who in their estimation perpetrated 9/11.
I recall a “genuine” video pushed by the MSM a couple of years ago, featuring a senior Al Qaeda leader getting offended by an increasing number of people doubting that Al Qaeda perpetrated 9/11. I simply don’t see indications that releasing pictures of Osama’s dead body or burying him in the ground would somehow prompt a number of Muslims to break out in suicidal rage or make his grave a shrine. If anything, Muslim radicals who believe that Osama masterminded 9/11 would derive pleasure from confirming that Osama died a martyr and thus went to Heaven. The circumstances surrounding Osama’s killing don’t accord with known factsIt takes two days at least for DNA matching yet the government has DNA confirmation of Osama’s identity within a day, which we don’t get to see. We’re told that Osama was living in a mansion and they found him with a computer, discs, flash drives and other modern computing equipment. We’re also told that no one can replace Osama in Al Qaeda. So this important person must’ve been making, and posting online, a lot of inspirational videos for his followers for the past couple of years, right? Where are these videos? What we have are a few pathetic fakes/forgeries. If we compare four videos of Osama in 2001, dated 10/07/2001, 11/03/2001, 11/09/2001 and 12/27/2001, the one dated 11/09/2001 is clearly fake; compared to the others it’s of very poor quality and the audio is noisy, making verification very difficult, the alleged Osama has a beard with a different coloring, the alleged Osama looks healthy whereas his health declines over the other three, and the contents are starkly different—no mention of certain ethnics from Israel and their counterparts elsewhere and no lamentation of the plight of Muslims. The 11/09/2011-dated video, made publicly available on 12/13/2011, is the one where the alleged Osama discusses his involvement in 9/11, but doesn’t mention that he did it to avenge the suffering of Muslims! In contrast, Osama flat-out denied being involved in 9/11 in an interview published in the Pakistani newspaper Ummat on 09/28/2001 and blamed Israel for it; the other contents of this interview are very similar to an interview he gave to CNN’s Peter Arnett about 4 years earlier, strongly suggesting that the Pakistani interview is authentic. Now, after Osama’s alleged killing, the U.S. government releases some videos of Osama they found, none with sound. So we can’t verify it’s his voice. The government didn’t have to release the audio in its entirety if they don’t want his followers to be inspired by his words—a lame excuse as lip readers can figure it out when he’s facing the camera—a few sentences here and there would suffice. One of the clips barely shows Osama’s face from the side, something easily faked. Another clip shows Osama with a wider, fleshier face and a dyed beard—it’s more difficult to match the complex color pattern of Osama’s beard than to dye the impersonator’s beard and come up with some lame explanation for why Osama dyed it—this Osama’s an impersonator. We’re told that Osama was a prolific email writer but had no internet access! He used flash drives and couriers to pass on and receive emails from others through internet cafés. This is rubbish. Someone as vain as he’s alleged to be, recording himself on video while watching his own coverage on MSM news and dyeing his beard black, didn’t have internet to keep current with the latest issues, many of which the MSM won’t cover? He didn’t have to access email through his personal internet connection. And what’s the bright idea of giving those hunting him a clue that he’s probably within 100 miles of the internet cafés from where central Al-Qaeda messages are being sent? The Al-Qaeda network had the genius to pull off one of the most amazing engineering feats in the history of humankind: they outfoxed NORAD and brought down, along the path of greatest resistance, three steel-framed skyscrapers—that were designed to withstand multiple jetliner impacts—with just two planes! But they couldn’t set up a convenient secure communications system? Start with the free and open source Linux operating system to keep costs low; open source ensures no backdoors are built in; the kernel is far superior to Microsoft Windows’; malware practically can’t be installed as the system consists of files, none of which can be executed by those who aren’t the owners of the files and don’t belong to the groups that the owners belongs to. Set up some of these computers in remote locations where the U.S. and other Western nations have no jurisdiction and a sizeable minority is sympathetic to Muslim terrorism, such as Malaysia. Use public-key-cryptography-based secure Shell access to one of these remote computers to establish a virtual private network tunnel, which prevents even one’s own ISP from interpreting internet traffic. On top of this use encrypted email and include important details in AES-Twofish-Serpent 256-256-256-bits encrypted attachments with a hidden volume for a plausible deniability scenario; one could be creative, say, a picture of Menachem Begin as the keyfile for decrypting the outer volume. You’re all set!... child’s play compared to 9/11, and Osama didn’t have to set it up; he could’ve used his genius engineers for the setup and teach him how to use it, which a mildly retarded individual can learn. The timing of Osama’s killingGiven said oddities about Osama’s alleged killing, one wonders, were there reasons behind the timing? Given the MSM going hog wild over Osama’s death, a logical possibility is an attempt to deflect attention away from another big issue. What could this be? Obama releases his long-form birth certificateOn April 27, 2011, Obama released a scan of what he alleges to be his long-form birth certificate proving that he was born in the U.S. Two different version were released, the Associated Press version and the White House version; the White House version is addressed below.
Various artifacts and the inconsistency (e.g., saturation) between adjacent letters reveal digital editing: In the images shown above notice that the security background deteriorates as the pdf is blown up (enlarged); it becomes pixelated with enlargement, the pixels being of different colors. However, notice that only the R in “BARACK” and the 1 in “10641” pixelate into different colors with enlargement; try any level of enlargement in a pdf reader... the square pixels become clearer with enlargement in the other letters/digits, but remain the same color. If one were to explain this as a consequence of OCR (optical character recognition; converts to text)—there was no need for OCR—and the occasional non-OCRed character as an artifact of imperfect OCR, how does one explain such jagged odd-shaped characters that are supposed to represent letters and numbers? Note that OCR isn’t applied to signatures. There are four signatures on the birth certificate. Only the attendant’s signature pixelates into different colors when the pdf is blown up. Among the other signatures, one character in the local registrar’s signature, “unham Obama” in Ann Dunham Obama’s signature and the entirety of the State Registrar’s signature retain the same color when blown up! We’ll shortly observe that OCR doesn’t apply as the pdf lacks text; in case critics argue that some characters were initially OCRed and then reconverted to image form—why would the scanner/software do this?—the following example shows how blown-up text looks like, nothing like what’s on the certificate.
Obama’s father’s race is listed as “African,” which couldn’t have been used to refer to any race at the time; blacks belong to the “Negroid” race; a black father should’ve been described as a Negro, the term in vogue at the time. There’s no seal of the State of Hawaii! Videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNJfdKClbH4 There’s much more but we’ve seen enough to infer that the scan of Obama’s long-form birth certificate is a forgery. What’s the significance of the Obama-Osama drama?Some may proceed to discuss Obama’s ineligibility to be President, that he should be removed from office, charged with document fraud-related felonies and even deported from the U.S. if he’s not even a citizen, a [multiple] felon and guilty of the deportable offense of falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen. I, however, believe that these aren’t the important issues. For the most part it doesn’t matter who the President of the U.S. is; he does the bidding of his masters. Who are his masters? Take the 14-trillion-dollar-plus, and rapidly rising, debt of the U.S. government. The master is the hand that feeds, not the one that receives, and is clearly the network of the international bankers. This network is in the position—by virtue of issuing money, as debt, for a very long time—to have ultimate ownership of the MSM, which is consistent with the MSM’s presentation of Obama. In the 2008 U.S. elections, the republicans lost heavily because an increasing number of Americans became frustrated with the protracted wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Two years later the newer democrat-dominated regime had still not closed the Guantanamo bay detention center and both wars had no end in sight. In the 2010 elections, the democrats lost heavily. The Guantanamo bay and war status quo remained intact until recently, when change came in the form of the U.S. attacking Libya! There are too many examples like this, which is the reason why over the decades an increasing number of Americans have lost interest in voting—what’s the point in so far as the big picture goes? The significance of the two major news items isn’t that Obama has to go; his replacement won’t solve our problems. The significance is that we can make a number of naïve individuals and fence sitters start questioning, and gravitating toward the light, without mentioning certain ethnics who predominantly control the MSM and international banking. Mention these ethnics and the naïve/fence sitters are liable to persuasion by the one and only Abe [Foxman] lamenting the accursed canards plaguing his community. But expose the public to a blatantly forged long-form birth certificate released three years after people started clamoring for it and some will question why the MSM are backing Obama to the point that they are complicit in the deception… wait, how did an obscure senator end up as leading Presidential candidate and then become President?… it isn’t mere complicity when the Obama phenomenon is an MSM creation in the first place… it’s more like Obama being complicit in the deception created by the MSM… why the Obama phenomenon?... what other lies have the MSM fed us?... why, in this light, should we believe in the tale of Osama’s recent killing, which is difficult to believe by itself?... didn’t the MSM feed us lies about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, the reason behind the U.S. invading it?… if the MSM are lying about Osama, what about Al Qaeda?… now I’ve been hearing these “nutcase” 9/11 conspiracy theories… who says they are deranged?... the MSM!... maybe I should have a look… what do I have to lose?... a few minutes, a few hours at most, of my time?... And then we assist. We start with MSM reports of five dancing, jubilant “Arabs” arrested celebrating the WTC towers hit by planes on 9/11. They turned out to have names such as Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari and Yaron Shmuel… surprise, surprise, no names such as Muhammad, Ahmed, Sadiki, Abdul, Hakeem, etc.! A summary of MSM coverage:
We then introduce some of the friendly Al-Qaeda people:
When their curiosity is piqued, we can direct the naïve/fence sitters to a cool book on 9/11, videos accompanying this book and a more specific analysis of the gentlemen who masterminded 9/11. At this point we can name the ethnics in some detail, safe in the knowledge that Abe’s screams about canards will be brushed aside… time to test whether they are canards or not. Alternative hypothesesIt’s reasonable to allow for the possibilities that a) Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen who has presented a true copy of his long-form birth certificate and b) that Osama was really killed by U.S. Navy Seals on May 2, 2011, the timing of his killing shortly after the release of the long-form birth certificate scan being a coincidence. If there are compelling facts or reasons for such conclusions, detractors should list them, thereby keeping the discussion civil. No ad hominem, off-topic issues or pejoratives please. To those inclined to dismiss this essay because it’s founded on racism or conspiracy theory, let’s not waste each other’s time. Regarding racism, had Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson or Alan Keyes been POTUS instead of Obama, the birth certificate issue would not arise, and I’ve made it very clear that I believe who gets to be POTUS is of little relevance in the situation we face. Additionally, the issue of presidential candidate John McCain being a natural-born citizen came up notwithstanding his whiteness. Regarding conspiracy, the MSM have spent some effort in explaining how people are reluctant to change their beliefs, more easily accept claims consistent with their beliefs and tend to demand a much higher standard of evidence for opposing arguments, which is well and good, but doesn’t address how people acquire some “strange” beliefs. What prompted 54% of the international public surveyed in 2008 to doubt the official 9/11 story, a proportion surely considerably greater than the corresponding figure in late 2001? What accounts for the increase? Certain inadequately explained issues that more people were increasingly exposed to. Properly address these issues—avoid refuting straw men and also address opposing arguments not being put forth by controlled opposition—and the conspiracy theory will have so few adherents that it would become insignificant. And if you’re inclined to respond like Matt Parrott targeting conspiracies at The Occidental Quarterly online, which is in MR’s genre, again let’s not waste each other’s time. Parrott has the following to say about Obama’s long-form birth certificate.
We’ve already seen that Parrott’s criticism falls apart. Whereas I’ve included copies of all nine layers, the readers don’t have to depend on others to show them the existence of these layers. Some have pointed out that the existence of the layers can be verified by opening the pdf in Adobe Illustrator, but this is expensive ($550-$600), proprietary software; if there’s a trial version of it then few will bother obtaining and installing it to verify the layers. But we can use free tools. One could use a free Hex editor to view the pdf as the computer sees it (HxD (Windows), DHEX (Mac OS, Linux)).
Image# Width Height bytes Colorspace 1 1652 1276 299366 8-bit color (RGB) 2 1454 1819 67980 1-bit monochrome 3 199 778 5510 1-bit monochrome 4 42 274 480 1-bit monochrome 5 123 228 633 1-bit monochrome 6 47 216 436 1-bit monochrome 7 34 70 173 1-bit monochrome 8 243 217 671 1-bit monochrome 9 132 142 344 1-bit monochrome Different parts of the birth certificate were scanned in different color spaces? Note also that the monochrome images use a losless compression algorithm (FlateDecode) whereas the color image uses a lossy compression algorithm (DCTDEcode). It’s clear that this “scan” is a forgery. Note that whether the scan is a forgery is a question of fact. If the scan is a forgery then the MSM treatment of it points to conspiracy. The underlying reason(s) or the question why is a matter of conspiracy theory. Critics should not confuse the three. If you need to address conspiracies please don’t bring in off-topic conspiracies concerning colloidal silver, fluoride, Reptilians, Roswell, aliens, etc. Most conspiracies are empty and earnestly promoted by the enemy for two good reasons: deflecting attention away from crucial issues and tarnishing good information by mixing it with the bad. Just address the facts in question and, if any, the conspiracy pertaining to these facts. In addition, if you plan on leaving a note about personality types prone to conspiratorial thinking, you might want to cite some peer-reviewed psychological literature showing whether this particular personality/orientation characterizes the majority or great majority of the population—think of 9/11 and JFK murder conspiracies, respectively—and how is this possible. And do note that if you leave it at this alone, you won’t have addressed any facts or perceived facts that fuel the conspiracy in question. A reiterationTo emphasize the point that the main significance of the Obama-Osama drama isn’t Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS, I’ll end with a few points. Obama’s birth certificate situation doesn’t compel one to believe that Obama was born outside the U.S. Anyone with an open mind and willingness to question authority can search and come across some interesting information on Obama’s background. You’ll find nude pictures of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. They were almost certainly taken by a pornographer, a sleaze who was into group sex and had sexual relations with an underage girl, and a communist black man by the name of Frank Marshall Davis, who was apparently one of the numerous black men that Obama’s mother was consorting with. The MSM tell us that Obama’s mother was a conservative woman. A conservative Caucasian woman would pose nude and consort with black men? A woman in her position would highly likely be mentally ill or something like a prostitute. Maybe Obama’s mother was a mentally ill Caucasian who believed that having sex with black men will atone for the sins of slavery, or perhaps she was a prostitute recruited to infiltrate black communist organizations, or… whereas curious, this topic is not particularly relevant to MR. More relevant, the wide-faced, short and slightly-built Kenyan alleged to be Obama’s father is, physically speaking, far less likely to have fathered him than Frank Davis. Obama could’ve been born in the U.S., with his birth certificate listing Frank Davis as the father. If true, had this come out before elections, the sleaze factor would’ve prevented Obama from becoming POTUS. On the other hand, what appears certain is that had John McCain or someone else become POTUS instead of Obama, our lives wouldn’t have been better and American decline would’ve continued in a similar manner. The important issue, therefore, is the reason why this situation exists, and we have an opportunity before us to assist naïve individuals and fence sitters figure out the answers by using these two events to sow further distrust of the MSM; the best thing is that we can do it without having to mention certain ethnics until the end of the discovery process, when it would be hardly necessary as they would’ve figured it out. Posted by J Richards on Friday, May 13, 2011 at 11:23 PM in 9/11, Media, That Question Again Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on May 14, 2011, 07:02 AM | # Welcome back, JR. It was great to find your piece at the top of the page this morning. I hope it signals a permanent return. Would you mail me, please? A pretty good video on the layers issue: http://snardfarker.ning.com/video/barack-obamas-long-form-birth?xg_source=msg_mes_network 3
Posted by John on May 14, 2011, 09:11 AM | # His certificate of live birth shows he was born in Kenya:http://alohareporter.com/2010/03/hawaii-considering-law-to-ignore-obama-birthers/ That passenger jets hit the WTC is questionable, and also that the WTC “collapsed” is questionable. Read Dr Judy Woods study of the evidence. Her’s is the only scientific study of what happened. 4
Posted by John on May 14, 2011, 09:27 AM | # This video explains the certificate: 5
Posted by Rollory on May 14, 2011, 11:09 AM | # What CAN be verified is that there was some sort of helicopter operation at the house in question in Abottabad that involved gunfire and left behind some dead bodies and some wrecked machinery. “brought down, along the path of greatest resistance, three steel-framed skyscrapers—that were designed to withstand multiple jetliner impacts—with just two planes” The fire-suppression system was NOT designed to handle multiple jetliner impacts. Regardless of the possibilities surrounding the leadup and aftermath of 9/11, I have as yet seen no convincing evidence that the planes were NOT the cause of the towers collapsing. You can argue that various political groups took undue advantage of this, and may have left doors open to make it easier to happen; that’s believeable. That the whole thing was orchestrated to unfold exactly as it did, is not. Also regarding the certificate: you left off mentioning the absence of chromatic aberration. Any scanned document has blue and red pixels around the edges of black text, it’s an inherent side effect of the glass lenses doing the scanning. The AP version of the cert has it, the WH version does not. The AP version appears to be a printed-out copy of the WH version that was then re-scanned. Furthermore the letters are kerned: if you draw rectangular boxes around the letters, you find the tips of them - like an ‘a’ next to a ‘p’ overlap into the neighboring box. This is the same sort of thing that proved the Rathergate forgery. 6
Posted by Mr Voight on May 14, 2011, 12:38 PM | # For the doctored layer theory to be true, it would mean that their workflow entailed editing/faking a document then releasing it as is - without the elementary act of printing out a copy of the forgery then scanning it, which would instantly hide any digital anomalies. That would be outrageously incompetent. 7
Posted by Graham_Lister on May 14, 2011, 12:47 PM | # @Mr Voight - why would an original document have layers in the first place? Would it not simply be scanned as one layer? 8
Posted by Mr Voight on May 14, 2011, 01:05 PM | # Graham, Illustrator can create layers for things like different colours and shades when importing. 9
Posted by Thorn on May 14, 2011, 01:33 PM | # I think Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. I beleive he possesses a valid long-form birth certificate. I also believe the LFBC his team released to the public was altered. That said, the question becomes: Why did the Obama team alter the original LFBC? Possibly to hide something that would prove extremely embarrassing to Obama, a/k/a the long-legged mack daddy? Or is this simply a case of the Obama team playing games? Is he leading his opponents into traps? If so, this makes tactical sence. Think about it: Once his opponents take the bait and become ensnared in his conspiracy theory traps, the long-legged mack daddy can then lower the boom, thus making his opponents look like simpleton chumps .......... which for the most part he was successful in accomplishing. One thing is for sure, Negroids are very adept at playing those types of psych games. 10
Posted by Graham_Lister on May 14, 2011, 01:34 PM | # OK but differing layers for different elements of text? 11
Posted by Thorn on May 14, 2011, 02:16 PM | # In the following interview between Dinesh D’souza and Richard Farmbrook, Farmbrook provides a common sence explanation of why it would be—given the logistics involved—virtually impossible for Stanley Ann Dunham to give birth to Barry in Mombasa, Kenya then make it appear he was born in Hawaii. The relevant part of the interview takes place between the 37 and 43 minute marks: 12
Posted by Grimoire on May 14, 2011, 04:39 PM | # Great article. ‘Imho’, as a result of my observations on the day and time it occurred, Sept 11/01, I think the probability 911 was a false flag operation is 99.99999%. The curious thing is, on the day it happened, I happened to have a planned engagement to go scuba diving with an ex US navy seal who lived in a boathouse on the outskirts of Mobil, Alabama. The fellow had multiple satellite dishes and an array of hacked receiver cards, he could pick up raw satellite feeds broadcasted to television studios for editing. We had watched and taped the previous gulf war in kuwait, raw footage - grisly stuff. When I arrived and went into his back yard to begin doing a checkout on our equipment, the initial attack had happened within the previous 30 minutes, and the first news feeds were being uploaded to the satellites for distribution to affiliates. My friend yelled for me to come in - we sat for the next 8 or 9 hours on the couch, switching between raw feeds. I do not know what people watching regular tv saw on that day, as during the time allotted I was watching the unedited feeds - and it wasn’t just that we were automatically suspicious and then utterly convinced we were watching a orchestrated psych-ops maneuver, what amused me was that practically every news announcer watching the events unfolding on that day said multiple times ‘this is not real’, ’ this is too much like a hollywood script’ (multiple times and variations), one even suspected they may be watching the onset of an internal revolution. I’ve never seen debunkers dredge up that fact - that on the day it happened even the ‘talking heads’ hired to appear on camera could see, in plain sight, what was going on. In the heat of events, with the missing or escaping president, (obviously scared shitless) it was all too plain. 13
Posted by Leon Haller on May 15, 2011, 05:14 AM | # Is it a conspiracy? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/imf_head_assault 14
Posted by GT on May 15, 2011, 12:12 PM | # “For the most part it doesn’t matter who the President of the U.S. is; he does the bidding of his masters. Who are his masters? Take the 14-trillion-dollar-plus, and rapidly rising, debt of the U.S. government. The master is the hand that feeds, not the one that receives, and is clearly the network of the international bankers.” - JR Global foreign exchange transactions with “US Dollars” on one side of the trade are currently averaging $3 trillion USD every 24 hours. The entire “US Government” budget deficit is about $1 trillion per year. This represents about 8 hours of FOREX trading volume on an average day. With this intensity and scale of demand for the USD there is no danger of the US Treasury being unable to finance the deficit, or of the US Dollar itself being abandoned any decade soon. 15
Posted by MJ on May 15, 2011, 10:17 PM | # HE might be Malcolm X’s son, that might be what he is hiding. 16
Posted by J Richards on May 15, 2011, 11:18 PM | # Rollory,
Correct, but irrelevant. When a jetliner collides with a building, the jet fuel will explode, and there’s no way to design a fire suppression system to do anything about this, but do the impact and burning jet fuel account for the collapse? No. The South tower was struck later and in this case most of the jet fuel burned outside the building, but it fell first, with the top beginning to tilt to the side, falling and then pulverizing in mid air. There’s no way to explain this in terms of an impact and burning jet fuel. Buildings 1 and 2 dealt with stronger shear forces from wind than the impact from a jetliner traveling in the neighborhood of 500 mph. A jetliner’s impact would partly dissipate in the crushing of the concrete structure surrounding the steel frame, partly in the shredding of the plane and partly in the breaking of the steel frame. The broken steel frame parts in the neighborhood of the impact wouldn’t collapse the building because this frame had a robust mesh structure; the mesh holds even if you destroy some links. You can see pictures of people standing where the jet hit the building. Had they been in the path of the plane when it hit, they would’ve been barbecued and shredded. They had to be safely distant from the impact point when the plane hit the building. That they walked to the site of the impact suggests that there was sufficient structure in the neighborhood for them to make it to the impact point and that the heat in the area wasn’t enough to fry a human, let alone undermine the structural integrity of steel. 17
Posted by J Richards on May 15, 2011, 11:21 PM | # Rollory,
I don’t think any person who doubts the official version of 9/11 believes that everything happened according to plan. It’s a safe bet that some powerful individuals who acquiesced to assisting in 9/11 were kept in the dark about some parts; for instance, they were told that planes would crash into the towers but not that the towers would be brought down by explosives. It’s unlikely that the plan was to hit the south tower such that most of the jet fuel ends up burning outside the building. It’s unlikely that the BBC had planned to report that WTC7 had fallen a half hour before it fell, and so on. Regarding the chromatic aberration issue, I’ve not addressed the birth certificate issue exhaustively, but it’s clear that most of the text is in black-and-white images, not even grayscale, i.e., these images can only have black or white colors, whereas the background is in color. There’s no way to scan a document and end up with something like this… so more technical issues such as chromatic aberration don’t require addressing. 18
Posted by J Richards on May 15, 2011, 11:26 PM | # Mr. Voight, You find the “doctored layer theory” difficult to believe because it would be outrageously incompetent. We’re not dealing with a theory here but a factual issue. How do you scan an image such that the background, some of the text and part of the signatures are scanned in color space but the remainder of the signatures and most of the text are scanned in black-and-white space? Again, there’s no OCR. The incompetence issue is a separate matter. If you search the web you won’t find many examples of people using hex or text editors to analyze the pdf… and, I’m not a digital artist. Similarly, you’ll find many digital artists who wouldn’t have a clue what they’re looking at when they see a pdf opened in a hex or text editor. So how many out there are both skilled digital artists and know enough about computer forensics to successfully forge a birth certificate? Not a whole lot and those who wished to forge Obama’s birth certificate couldn’t just advertise for people who have both skills; they had to find one among their own. This then becomes a luck issue. If they’re lucky they’ll find the person they need among their own. So either the conspiring forgers weren’t lucky or competence isn’t an issue. It could very well be that some people are feuding among themselves, one camp wanting to gloat over having foisted a black man over white America and another complaining that the issues of this black man are creating problems for their crime network and that a white puppet without these issues would’ve been preferable. So the second camp could’ve decided to expedite the removal of the black clown, after having had enough, and resume business with a white one, the other responding by deflecting attention from the birth certificate by focusing on Osama, which the second camp couldn’t sabotage. This is mere speculation, but you can’t dismiss evidence of forgery that’s intrinsic to a document by focusing on extrinsic factors. 19
Posted by J Richards on May 15, 2011, 11:35 PM | # GT, The only money issued by the treasury comprises of coins, the total value of which is a negligible fraction of American money. The bills are printed by the Federal Reserve, which is a private banking system. The total dollar value of these bills is still a miniscule fraction of American money, most of which exists as computer entries, made by private banks. Let’s overview the way the treasury finances the budget deficit. To cover the budget deficit, it issues bonds, which people buy; it doesn’t issue money except for coins that practically don’t count. 10% of these bonds will be bought from the public by the Federal Reserve, using money created out of thin air (the computer entries are changed). After this money is deposited into the bank accounts of the people from which the Federal Reserve buys the bonds, the banks will loan 10 times the amount, creating it entirely out of nothing. Thus the U.S. dollar represents debt (10% created by the Federal Reserve and 90% created by other private banks) and the international bankers are the true masters. Since the U.S. dollar represents debt, on most counts it matters little whether it persists for a few years or a few decades; anything the international bankers may replace it with will also represent debt. However, as with the Euro, the bankers don’t like the inefficiency of multiple currencies and would prefer a global currency, which I doubt will be the U.S. dollar. The U.S. and other Western governments will be the masters of their countries only when they issue their own money and prohibit banks and other private entities or individuals from creating money in any form. 20
Posted by John on May 16, 2011, 12:37 AM | # The birth certificate thing isn’t so important. Probably the people who chose him to be president didn’t check, or did and saw it to be to their benefit. Nothing will come of it. 22
Posted by Jim on May 16, 2011, 10:16 AM | # I used even thesaurus but i don’t get the meaning of the word ‘hexadecimal’.... 23
Posted by GT on May 17, 2011, 08:20 PM | # Dasein,
Actually it is. Thanks. —— Jim,
——-
I don’t dispute you. My point, admittedly not clear, is there’s no danger of a crash anytime soon. 24
Posted by EasilyAmusedObserver on May 18, 2011, 02:38 PM | # Excellent article all around, can not praise it highly enough. Dr. Judy Woods is a 911 disinfo agent. Her purpose is to spread disinfo about 911, to distract from Israeli involvement, and to discredit the movement generally. The real 911 Truth movement is: Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth http://www.ae911truth.org/ 911 Family BuildingWhat Campaign http://www.buildingwhat.org/ Journal of 911 Studies http://www.journalof911studies.com/ The 911MissingLinks film above is good, also see Zero: An Investigation into 911 and 911: Press for Truth, the true story - now seemingly forgotten - of the 911 Families trying to get the government to investigate 911. It’s as if the entire history of late 2001-2004 has gone down the memory hole for most people. 25
Posted by blahblahblah on May 22, 2011, 07:17 AM | # The digital layering thing was probably done to conceal anomalies in the doctored birth certificate. This way, anything unusual that turns up can just be blamed on the scanning software. Otherwise, they’d have no excuse. If the birth certificate is real, Obama could end this whole thing tomorrow by simply rescanning it as a JPEG. Wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for that to happen though. 26
Posted by Randy on June 16, 2011, 02:09 AM | # GT, this synonyms dictionary is also great thing! I always thought that guys who make researches like this are numerologists a bit 27
Posted by J Richards on August 15, 2011, 09:38 PM | # The Osama-killing hoax keeps getting more ludicrous As people would’ve heard, on August 6, 2011, a Chinook was shot down in Afghanistan, killing 30 Americans and 8 Afghans in it. The circumstances were highly unusual. The claim’s that the Taliban shot it with a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG), at night——what a lucky shot! The giant bird burst into flames and came down in three large pieces, with twisted chunks of it scattered on both sides of a river. Coalition forces spent several days cleaning up yet the locals managed to get a number of souvenirs—this is how far the debris scattered. How does an RPG cause this kind of damage? The second curiosity’s that the army quickly blamed insurgents whereas for maintaining morale and other psychological purposes, one would expect them to blame it on an accidental crash. Most interestingly, who were the Americans killed?
Packing so many elite soldiers in one Chinook is a serious violation of protocol. A second serious violation of protocol was using a Chinook meant for the National Guard rather than the special operations Chinooks that are meant to transport elite soldiers. Internet access was blocked for U.S. army low-level operatives in Afghanistan when news about the Chinook’s downing started to spread among them. To make the matters more interesting, the U.S./NATO commander John Allen said that F-16s killed the insurgents responsible, providing no verifiable details. The clean-up crew blew up the larger remains of the Chinook and took the smaller parts with them. 28
Posted by Jeremy on May 14, 2012, 01:43 AM | # Conspiracy theories are interesting but unless, it does make things happen I can’t argue with you. 29
Posted by Nick on July 07, 2012, 04:21 AM | # Obama need to go home because we are sick and tired.system is broked and we need to exchange. we need the change! Next entry: Probability Theory and Survival of the White Race Previous entry: Steuckers on radical right literature |
|||||||||||
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Donald commented in entry 'Neolithic mitochondrial haplogroup H genomes and the genetic origins of Europeans' on 05/24/13, 06:31 PM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'Leftism as a Code Word (Part 1): The White Left' on 05/24/13, 11:55 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/24/13, 10:02 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/24/13, 09:30 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/24/13, 07:50 AM. (go) (view) Austin Rodenberg commented in entry 'What is Racism? Why is it bad?' on 05/24/13, 07:34 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/24/13, 06:14 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/24/13, 02:46 AM. (go) (view) Al Ross commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/24/13, 01:13 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/24/13, 12:55 AM. (go) (view) Al Ross commented in entry 'Book review: Culture Wars by David Hamilton' on 05/23/13, 07:43 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 06:32 PM. (go) (view) Al Ross commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 04:41 PM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'White Air Force' on 05/23/13, 02:57 PM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'White Air Force' on 05/23/13, 01:42 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The White Genocide Evidence Project' on 05/23/13, 12:37 PM. (go) (view) Morgoth commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 12:24 PM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 12:17 PM. (go) (view) Dude commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 11:41 AM. (go) (view) Dude commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 11:39 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 05/23/13, 11:17 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 05/23/13, 11:11 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 11:04 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 10:18 AM. (go) (view) Dude commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 09:22 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 09:10 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 09:08 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 06:33 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 06:14 AM. (go) (view) Dude commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 03:50 AM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 03:49 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 03:28 AM. (go) (view) DanielS commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 02:09 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 02:05 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Woolwich Outrage - can't have the lower orders getting too excited' on 05/23/13, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Anti-White Media Audio/Video
Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Graham_Lister on May 14, 2011, 06:43 AM | #
Excellent piece with forensic analysis. The layering of a PDF in that manner is very odd…but as you rightly point out precisely which puppet is POTUS is very much a secondary issue. I hope that people don’t think voting Republican or Conservative is a solution to the deep problems facing Western societies because if you do then you are as deluded as the whack jobs talking about lizards over at the David Icke forum.
As for Osama as soon as I was aware of the media narrative I was skeptical - simply too inconsistent and incoherent and as you rightly point out not a single shred of independently verifiable evidence on the matter. So simply the MSM feeding us the official line. On of al-Qaeda, and the mythology that surrounds this organization there is a rather good MSM documentary (rare as hen’s teeth) by Adam Curtis called “The Power of Nightmares”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares
Of course Curtis avoids the obvious third-rail of the influence of organized Jewry in all this, but still it’s a start. His previous documentary “The Century of the Self” is also excellent in charting the growth of PR, consumerism and the promotion of pseudo-individuality in what are tightly-managed Western Societies, particularly the USA as experts in the manufacturing of consent. Is it any wonder why any form of collective identity is so hard to inculcate and find expression into Euro-America?