Once More Across Chicago etc

Posted by Happy Cracker on April 29, 2009, 06:28 PM | #

I fucking love you Soren. You are the apex of a kind of humor that I can only put my finger on:
Its eccentric over-seriousness coupled with a relativistic understanding and therefore is always
willing to grant the validity of the perspective from which it could be seen as a joke. Its something like meta-humor, and its fucking hilarious. The contrast with your [presumably mostly bewildered] audience heightens the funniness of it. At the same time, you obviously mean all or most of what you say.

“Not only do I think that I’m likely to alienate this audience with what I’m about to explain - but I think I can alienate absolutely any audience.”

Please make more speeches and keep posting. I’ll comment more on the substance of your speech later.

Posted by Happy Cracker on April 29, 2009, 06:59 PM | #

I didn’t “get” the mystical aspects of this speech.

I didn’t understand the subject without confines - what is it, precisely?

The ending of the video is pretty “scary”, particularly the quote that billions will die.
It is alienating to me (somewhat) for this reason:

Human beings are content to let thousands, millions, and ultimately billions of people die
as a blunder - as something that happens as a result of improper planning, short-termist
thinking, etc. They aren’t prepared for the conscious knowledge of such an event,
even if the event is impending, which you obviously believe it to be.

Even if everyone knew that something like that were going to happen, it is so politically
(i.e. in terms of human relations and cooperation) explosive even to mention it, that we
are condemned to deny the possibility of its occurence, even if we think it more than likely.
Because most people ( or make predictions or ‘get around’ information sources that want to program them,
there will always be a moral injunction not to speak the (terrible) truth if only because it is
criminal to frighten the masses in such a serious way. [I haven’t put any effort into clarifying
these ideas but I’m sure you can see what I mean]

Of course, to paraphrase Nietzsche, insofar as we sacrifice future possibilities (resources ultimately
impact human life, so ultimately these are questions of human lives) we are “living on the blood of the future” - i.e. sacrificing the future. The “good” thing about the future is that its inhabitants cant cry out against injustices done to them - we can “murder”, “despoil”, and really destroy their chances at live pre-emptively before they even come into existence. Because society developed with the average person having no very long cognitive time horizon, there are no rules about killing “future man”. He is unprotected.

Nietzsche also said something like: “If you keep four friends around you by compromising yourself, there is always a fifth friend, not yet arrived, who must die.” It makes me sad that I can’t remember the precise formulation because it was in fact quite beautiful and forboding.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 29, 2009, 07:05 PM | #

Great speech by Soren.  Regarding the substance, a couple of small points:  1) does anyone remember something like three or four years ago a scientist came out with objective calculations showing that new scientific discoveries peaked in the 1600s and have dwindled in number since then, and are continuing to dwindle?  I just tried googling it to no avail.  It’s a detail that would seem to have relevance for the theory of a coming collapse.

2) It should be obvious to everyone that one uniformly coffee-colored world is impossible by thermodynamics — there will always persist thermodynamically ineradicable nodes of inhomogeneity however slight, and people will base new ethnoracial groups thereon however slight and will divide themselves all over again into distinct races however slight the distinctness.  In the world of Negroes there are castes depending on darkness/lightness of skin, yet to white men they’re all just Negroes.  They’ve divided themselves into races.  Likewise in the world of Israeli Jews:  over there, there’s the Ashkenazi Jewish race, the Mizrahi Jewish race, the Sephardic Jewish race.  To an extent they refuse to intermarry or even to merely socialize, and there’s a certain amount of inter-group hatred.  When Southwest Africa gained independence, unmixed Negroes went door to door and massacred mulattoes.  They’re all just Negroes to us but among themselves huge racial differences are apparent.  The mulattoes were a different race.  There always will be different races if only different gradiations of Negroness, of Jewishness, or what-have-you.  It will be impossible to make everything uniform, so races will arise.  This “one raceless world” invented and pushed by the Jews is one of the biggest, filthiest lies in planetary history.  There is never going to be a raceless one-coffee-colored world, which is a thermodynamic impossibility exactly as an ocean or an atmosphere with planetwide perfect homogeneity of temperature and humidity is a thermodynamic impossibilty, an ocean without ocean currents and and atmosphere without weather are thermodynamic impossiblities, the complete eradication of all ants or flies or mosquitos in the world is a thermodynamic impossibility, and so on.  There will always be races:  it will be literally impossible to eradicate them.  The important thing is to make sure Euros are among the races there will always be.

3)  Project Guttenberg has a few of Hegel’s complete works available for reading including the German-language originals.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 29, 2009, 07:10 PM | #

“different gradiations of Negroness” = different gradations of Negroness

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 29, 2009, 07:15 PM | #

“There will always be races:  it will be literally impossible to eradicate them.”  (—my comment)

Just to clarify my meaning there:  Eradicating this or that specific race is possible.  What’s not possible is eradicating “race.”  Never gonna happen.  Who says so?  Thermodynamics.  Eradicating “race” is in the same thermodynamic category as building a perpetual motion machine.  Ain’t gonna happen.  Individual races, however, can of course be eradicated.  It’s our business as Euros to see that our race isn’t one of them.

Posted by J Richards on April 29, 2009, 08:20 PM | #

Billions will die; we will live!

I don’t like the ending, quoted above.  It’s reminiscent of the Jew agent provocateur Diamed.  I think it’s worthwhile to qualify it by speculating on cataclysmic scenarios.

If catastrophic events are natural (meteor strike, mutant viruses, etc.), they’ll be politically neutral, and ‘we will live’ would be wishful thinking, i.e., we hope to live.

But the context suggests that Søren isn’t talking about natural events.  The context is problems faced by Euro man, caused by other men.  At the core of these problems lies a tribal group numbering less than 15 million, the self-proclaimed ‘chosen people.’  More toward the periphery lie a few dozen million non-Europeans, the ones living in the West.
 
So what non-natural events could result in a toll of billions?  All scenarios lead to activities of members of the tribe, the ‘chosen people’: nuclear-explosion false flag operations, bio-engineered pathogens, inter-continental race wars, and the Samson option if all else fails.  Look at this latest swine flu virus, with an odd combination of RNA material.  It certainly wouldn’t be unusual for members of the tribe to have engineered it.

The take home message at the end of the video should have been ‘beware of the Jews.’  They are cooking something vile and foul, as always.

Posted by Captainchaos on April 29, 2009, 08:46 PM | #

Who is the man pictured behind you?  Is that Hegel?

Posted by persona on April 29, 2009, 10:11 PM | #

FS: Likewise in the world of Israeli Jews:  over there, there’s the Ashkenazi Jewish race, the Mizrahi Jewish race, the Sephardic Jewish race.

It’s actually a mistake to talk about “the Jewish race” - Jews are a distinct ethnic group for sure, but definitely not a race.  Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Mizrahim, and so forth are all sub-ethnic groups of the larger Jewish ethnic group.

FS: The mulattoes were a different race.

Again, you throw around the word “race” far too loosely.  Mulattoes are not a distinct and separate race, they are a mix between different races (Blacks and Whites). 

—-

SR: Is Hitler’s eyes brown in that picture behind you?  I can’t quite tell, but they look brown as far as I can tell; if so, that portrait is incorrect (like some others which mistakenly portrayed him with brown eyes)...Hitler had very blue eyes.

Posted by Søren Renner on April 29, 2009, 10:26 PM | #

I didn’t understand the subject without confines - what is it, precisely?

http://eurosiberia.wetpaint.com/page/SUBJECT+WITHOUT+CONFINES

Posted by cladrastis on April 30, 2009, 12:10 AM | #

A few questions:

1) did you devise the terms “econational futurism” and “europia” (I’v never heard anyone else use them), if so, what exactly constitutes the former?

2) did you create the emblem for europia?

3) relative to 2) above, what is the symbolism behind its design (the green background is obvious, and I assume that the broken pentagon is a permutation on the swastika)?

Posted by Old Raven on April 30, 2009, 04:20 AM | #

Nice work Soren, but where’s part 3?  Also, where can I buy the t-shirt and the tasteful wallpaper?

Posted by Lurker on April 30, 2009, 05:11 AM | #

Subject without confines.

whooosh!

My head.

Ive read the linked article, and through the mists I thought I glimpsed something, something I could almost make out the shape of. But no, it was not to be. I promise to try again.

Posted by Guessedworker on April 30, 2009, 07:11 AM | #

Fred,

Scientific discovery follows the law of low-hanging fruit.  I think there is a possibility that the small incrementals in high technology progression are team efforts possibly suiting the East Asian mentality.  Europeans have certainly more adept at the great threshhold discoveries by individual geniuses.

Soren,

Well done.  Your style of delivery, btw, contains a promise of substance ... of original thinking.  And that’s what people love to hear, providing they can situate its premises within their own hopes and experiences.  That’s a tough ask with the Anti-Christ.  But we do have Mr Pianka to help with that.

Posted by Søren Renner on April 30, 2009, 11:37 AM | #

Nice work Soren, but where’s part 3?  Also, where can I buy the t-shirt and the tasteful wallpaper?

I can answer one of your questions. You can buy the t-shirt at zazzle.

http://www.zazzle.com/europia_flag_tshirt-235620012118150943

It’s a good shirt. They use a printer with fiber-reactive dyes.

Posted by Lurker on May 04, 2009, 12:12 AM | #

GW - I’m not totally sure about this low-hanging fruit concept with regard to discovery.

What was harder (or easier if you like) - Newton coming up with his laws in isolation, almost out of nowhere or Einstein’s theories arrived at in a culture nurturing science, research and investigation? Surely the low-hanging fruit actually came later. The pioneers are the ones pulling down the branches for later arrivals to pick that fruit.