RACIAL BOLSHEVISM

Posted by zusammen on October 26, 2007, 03:18 PM | #

Our people began by having enough heart (unlike most other tribes) to venture out of warmth into the permanent frost and enough spirit to endure those thousands of years, making their future forebearers a great people among lessers on the Earth. We did not begin our wonderful evolutionary trek understanding industry, physics and tools; objects that now overwhelmingly feed our vices or slay us outright.

Here are some samples of dying whiteman’s modern industrial materialism.

The so-called Great Pacific Garbage Patch - a heap of debris floating in the Pacific that’s twice the size of Texas, consists of 80 percent plastics and weighs some 3.5 million tons, say oceanographers. It floats where few people ever travel, in a no-man’s land between San Francisco and Hawaii.

Sea turtles mistake clear plastic bags for jellyfish. Birds swoop down and swallow indigestible shards of plastic. The petroleum-based plastics take decades to break down, and as long as they float on the ocean’s surface, they can appear as feeding grounds.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/10/19/SS6JS8RH0.DTL&type=politics

Overcoming beneficial natural selective pressures, materialism ultimately, not fundamentally, seeks physical safety and comfort. It is ultimately a dysgenic practice. Unable to procreate due to industrial material mentality:

Experts estimate that the hereditary form of prostate cancer accounts for just 5-10% of all cases.

Some experts theorize that this suggests an environmental connection, possibly related to high-fat diets, less exposure to the sun, exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium, infectious agents, or smoking.

Sedentary lifestyle: You may be able to reduce your risk for prostate cancer by getting regular exercise and maintaining your optimal weight.

http://www.webmd.com/prostate-cancer/guide/prostate-cancer-risk-factors

No people have yet shown us the wisdom needed master material and most importantly themselves as civilizations without eventually sinking into ruin or in some cases ethnic extinction.

Mr. Constantine proposes a slick, quick gratification solution that every past empire has already trod.

Posted by Guessedworker on October 26, 2007, 06:25 PM | #

The material/spiritual question certainly appears at first to be not at all complicated.  As you’ve said before, Constantin, the “European gene pool” - the wholly material basis for who we are - is everything.  And, as you say here, it is also everything for those perfect fictions, the gods.

But the issue becomes more difficult when we begin to ponder where theistic feeling comes from and what it does.  Since faith is an evolved human quality selected, like any other such quality, for its fitness gain, it should be easy to say what that gain is.  And yet it isn’t, and as far as I am aware there is no wide agreement on it.

The best stab at it that I have come across is that faith places a high value on in-group trust - the highest possible, actually, exporting the object of faith beyond the group and placing it somewhere “above”.  It acts as a special filter on the valuation of group membership, not unlike fealty to kingship except that faith vehicles usually prescribe and underpin adaptive customs, which is a considerable advantage.

So far so good.  But then we look closer and find that faith is only half of the problem.  Spirituality has two faces: an exoteric, worshipful, outward-looking collective face and an esoteric, inward-looking, personal one.  By my estimation, the first arises in Europeans in a frequency of about 50%.  The non-faithful 50% can still talk the faith talk - and for much of history they have had to do exactly that, under pain of excommunication or worse.  But they can’t believe in the same head-over-heels way that their more pious brothers can.

The esoteric face arises in a frequency of perhaps only five cases in a thousand.  It IS that rare, and people who consider it a commonplace simply do not know what it is.

No matter, it’s fruits are attested by those who know them.  And yet what can a striving away from the mechanical, from the acquired ... what can an intensified self-consciousness and the mastery of self possibly signify from an evolutionary perspective?

I am at a loss on this.  If consciousness is indeed intentional, why?

Posted by zusammen on October 27, 2007, 01:25 AM | #

The best stab at it that I have come across is that faith places a high value on in-group trust - the highest possible, actually, exporting the object of faith beyond the group and placing it somewhere “above”.

Yes, referring to the Declension of Being model, moving away from nothingness.

Look at the Muslims, then at us modern Westerners for an example comparison. They outbreed us and they force our militaries into retreat. This was not the case once upon a time.

Their material works are pulled along by a belief in something beyond matter on a higher plane of organization. Modern Western material works and especially the willpower fuelling these acts are constrained by the mere facts of matter.

The Muslims fight for a secured eternity that can’t be seen or touched. The modern Westerner reluctantly signs on for the next month’s paycheck.

Posted by VLC on October 27, 2007, 09:56 PM | #

could the editor at least tone down the silly soviet fetichism?

On this blog right now we have right next to each other, one important news brought to us by James Bowery about that jewess who wants to fight “extremists” at home and one bolshevik(?) pamphlet written by some kook whose writing style is say soviet, for a lack of a better term. I can’t help but to notice the contrast.

this Hoffmeister weirdo is the intellectual equivalent of the costumed neo-nazi clowns you see in rallies or doing their own rallies. There’s a Minuteman rally against illegal immigrants in AZ and out of nowhere a guy with a nazi flag appears. You scratch your head and you ask yourself: WTF? Some nigger does his TNB and kills someone in a town and a few days later you see people in brown nazi uniforms bought at Wal-Mart marching through the town and distributing written material to awake the white masses or something. Do they really think it works? do they even care?

This blog has good writers and good comments but all of a sudden you see this guy speaking about Bolshevism, colonizing the solar system or whatever and posting images of soviet propaganda. Ah, that great white empire that did so many good things for the european race, the USSR!

I’m asking you: WTF?

In a rude manner of speaking, mental masturbation should be secondary to real sex.

that’s right: go fuck a woman and produce lots of children but stop producing any intellectual material to pollute this blog. Turn you mind off and go to bed

Posted by John on October 28, 2007, 01:25 PM | #

VLC, I believe you speak for a majority of the people who read this blog.

Posted by zusammen on October 30, 2007, 06:15 PM | #

And yet what can a striving away from the mechanical, from the acquired ... what can an intensified self-consciousness and the mastery of self possibly signify from an evolutionary perspective?

The noble man honours in himself the powerful one, him also who has power over himself, who knows how to speak and how to keep silence, who takes pleasure in subjecting himself to severity and hardness, and has reverence for all that is severe and hard. “Wotan placed a hard heart in my breast,” says an old Scandinavian Saga: it is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. (Beyond Good and Evil, Chapter IX, §260)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 30, 2007, 07:24 PM | #

I agree with Constantin regarding the essential significance of race, as essential to the nation as the physical body to the individual.  Race is, in fact, the nation’s physical body:  change the race and it is no longer the same nation.  The nation is gone, dead, no longer in existence, and a new one has appeared in its place. 

Where I disagree with C is in his insistence that opposition to forced race-replacement requires a thoroughly materialist outlook.  I’ve said before (but couldn’t find it to link to, so I’ll say it again) that by bringing this abstruse material/spiritual dimension into the discussion he’s weakening our side by inventing for it whole new philosophical vulnerabilities it doesn’t have and potential counterattacks it doesn’t deserve.  I’ll leave it at that because I don’t like getting into this sort of philosophy/physics interface which has no bearing on the legitimacy of opposition to forced race-replacement.  C thinks he’s strengthening our side with this stuff but he’s weakening it.  Leave out “the spiritual” and “the material.”  No one knows if the material springs from the spiritual or vice-versa.  Just say “this is our race and we want to keep it.”  It’s simple.  Don’t complicate it or pretend it has foundations it doesn’t have, especially when those foundations are made of sand not granite.

Most of the rest of his essay is good.

Posted by zusammen on October 30, 2007, 08:07 PM | #

Just say “this is our race and we want to keep it.” It’s simple.

That doesn’t have a stronger value foundation than millions of degenerates stating, “This is our lifestyle and we want to keep it.” We need statements of higher value.

Given constant mainstream devaluation of European ethnocentricism, your statement presently has less value within the western hemisphere than those millions of individual degenerate lifestyles whos freedom they all believe to be more important than and threatened by European ethnocentricism.

We need to show our people, those who are worthwhile, that existing mainstream truisms are false and that our way is better for them, not just another weird, meaningless lifestyle/hobby preference within a liberal democratic consumer freedom framework.

Posted by Guessedworker on October 30, 2007, 08:12 PM | #

Fred,

There’s spirit, and then there’s spirit - witness this quote from an interview by Troy Southgate with Robert Steuckers:-

Southgate:  Do you have a “spiritual angle”?

Steuckers: By answering this question, I risk being too succinct. Among the group of friends who exchanged political and cultural ideas at the end of the Seventies, we concentrated of course on Evola’s Revolt Against the Modern World. Some of us rejected totally the spiritual bias, because it lead to sterile speculation: they preferred to read Popper, Lorenz, etc. I accepted many of their criticisms and I still dislike the uttermost Evolian speculations, alleging a spiritual world of Tradition beyond all reality; the real world being disregarded as mere triviality.

But this is of course a cult of Tradition mainly supported by young people “feeling ill in their own skin”, as we say. The dream to live like beings in fairy tales is a form of refusing to accept reality. In Chapter 7 of Revolt Against the Modern World, Evola, on the contrary, stresses the importance of the “numena”, the forces acting within things, natural phenomena or powers. The initial Roman mythology laid the accent more on the numena than on the personalised divinities. This bias is mine. Beyond the people and the gods of the usual religions (be they Pagan or Christian), there are acting forces and man should be in concordance with them in order to be successful in his earthly actions.

I am a materialist in matters of politics, and find that Nature is by far the principal “acting force” with which “man should be in concordance” “in order to be successful in his earthly actions”.

Like you, I agree with Constantin’s general argument in this post.  But ...

If not will, Nature has purpose, of course.  Man as Animal has purpose, not will.  Man as an individual is suggestible and absent.  Were he self-possessed and present - and this is possible in a certain sense - he would have will.

Politically, talk of the will already lands us in the spirit world, and I take no cogniscance of it.  One needs to understand that planning and effecting movement in the world is not proof of will, but of the suggestibility of one’s fellow Man.  Let us, in trying to meet Zusammen’s high aesthetic, cleave to the provable real.

Posted by zusammen on October 30, 2007, 10:02 PM | #

I’m also with Nietzsche who considered natural effects non-moral, or beyond good and evil. In many ways, our materialist modernity, seeking a new dygenic era of physical safety and comfort, struggles against natural effects.

Fighting racism and cancer are struggles against natural effects. The overwhelming majority of materialists, having their own superstitious beliefs, comically regard racism and cancer as immoral Evils, yet they do not deny their nature.

But, doesn’t the best proven dominion of materialism over mankind, liberal democratic capitalism, cause inter-ethnic conflict and cancer?

In the modern Western mind, moral evils are troublesome natural effects with causes that “can’t be prevented, but are treatable”, that stand in the way of universal utilitarianism perfected, the materialist utopia.

Posted by zusammen on October 30, 2007, 10:11 PM | #

In addition to a better subjective aesthetic, my views are against what I objectively perceive in modernity’s self-destructive contradictions.

Posted by dlfgnkdgn on November 05, 2007, 08:45 AM | #

I wonder if that jab at Yockey means Vonze will stop intoning the holy sacred formula “IMPERIVM EVROPA”? I’m guessing no. But it’s good to see he’s hopped aboard the Finnish fetish bandwagon; apparently these people are a very profound race of philosophers, warriors, poets, musicians and litterateurs, judging from all the internet promotion in which they themselves, and their neofolk groupies, indulge. Probably a few more years will pass before Vonze tires of the neofolk game of looking around for right-wing politics in the nooks & crannies of Europe. Then, presumably, he’ll get back to Aryans on the moon, as I should think his paean to “the ASTRONAUT” is an early indication. Science, that’s the answer! and at once we are thrown back to the heady days of positivism.

Posted by dlfgnkdgn on November 05, 2007, 08:50 AM | #

I would also be curious to know - if it isn’t indecent - how many children Vonze has produced, if any, or if his bold assertion that “fucking is more important than thinking” is not, perhaps, a symptom of deprivation of this biological need. Generally, when a man writes an imperiovs need of fucking and titties into politics, one may take that as an indication of the predominant themes in his head.

On the other hand—at least it isn’t the smarmy, lapdoggish chivalry obtaining at Stormfroth and VNNF.

Posted by Metal Gear on December 27, 2009, 12:50 AM | #

This is a great one, Constantin!