Posted by notuswind on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:46 | #

Like most Americans, I didn’t know that the U.S. was schedule to play England until it was already over and the score announced.

The news cycle over here has been dominated by the underwater oil geyser in the gulf, which is proving to be a mighty blow to our national psyche.

Posted by Bill on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:18 | #

Just as the working class failed to produce the left’s dream of paving the way to stars, the boys of the beautiful game have failed to ignite the multi-cult in their opening game in S. Africa.

The journos of the multi-cult are not happy bunnies this morning, just take a look at the Mail.

The establishment elites have gone out on a limb on this one, masses of red and white, and all those crosses of St George (even over no.10) and Britain never-never will be slaves - must be sticking in their collective craw.

But of course their Britain is not our Britain, but the chavs don’t know it yet.

Posted by Angry Beard on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:18 | #

As you may have gathered, I cannot stand football (or soccer as some call it), and the type of people who are fanatical about it.
Let’s get things into perspective.Football as we know it today (it bears absolutely no relation whatsoever to the mediaeval peasant festivity on holy days and high days) is a purely victorian invention dating back no further than the 1860s (American civil war if you want a reference point), and it should have been junked years ago with all of the rest of the Victorian, pompous, anal-retentive rubbish.
Basically, the public (private) schools invented it to calm down the natural high energy levels of young boys, who in a natural setting would be out there in nature climbing trees, fighting imaginary enemies, forming gangs (in the old sense), playing at being soldiers and doing all the natural ‘boyish’ things.
Football was a horrible attmpt by adults to impose their own rules on to natural and freeborn kids, destroy their own autonomous play (which was far more emotionally and psychologically satisfying in terms of development) and generally impose an order where none existed or need to exist - so that the schoolboys would be tired out be bedtime - hence it was evil and only the Victorians could devise something so unnatural and disciplinarian.
  Anyhow the great unwashed for some reason hijacked the sport of the upper classes and turned it into a mindless and maeningless spectator spectacle - football only has any real meaning if you actually play it yourself.

Posted by Bill on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:59 | #

The elites hijack national pride at a whim and they are very choosy.

They (elites) deem it very natural for the chavs to demonstrate their allegiance to their national psyche in the sphere of sports, athletics, motor racing, equestrian events what-ever, winning is to be applauded, welcomed in fact that they (elites) can bask in reflected glory.

But when those same chavs start chanting I-n-g-e-l-a-n-d at a BNP rally, or complain that immigrants are getting a better deal, and that they’re victims of affirmative action, then those self same elites spin on a tanner and call them Nazis, fascist, bigots, racist, odious, knuckle dragging and the like.

The BBC proudly point out that there’s no such thing as losing, the BBC only have runners up.

In a fight to the death there are only winners and runners up.

The absurdities of liberalism knows no bounds.

Posted by Wandrin on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:22 | #

not when the reality all around them is so, er, different

It’s interesting a lot of the cracks in the wall are coming from non-white journos.

This whole process started off with racist anti-white jews pretending to be white anti-racists. They then successfully guilt-trip lots of affluent white liberals into publicly supporting the multicult and mass immigration. Result - lots of immigrants. But, because the multicult’s anti-racism is in reality anti-white racial hatred in disguise, it isn’t directed at and doesn’t effect the immigrants. So some of them end up telling the truth about the multicult.

Unintended consequences.

Posted by nemesis on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:46 | #

Who wrote that Guardian editorial openly calling for the genocide of the English?

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:59 | #

A Subcon named Kanishk Tharooor:

Kanishk Tharoor is associate editor at openDemocracy.net. His writings on politics and culture have also been published in The Independent, The National, The Hindu, The Times of India, The Telegraph (Calcutta), the Virginia Quarterly Review and YaleGlobal Online. His appearances on radio and TV include BBC’s Today programme and BBC News. He is a published and award-winning author of short fiction.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/kanishk-tharoor

Posted by nemesis on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:49 | #

Kanishk Tharooor is a genocidist.

Posted by Dan Dare on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:07 | #

... unwavering assertion of multicultural English – not British – identity. This kind of claim is overdue. In an era of devolution, to be English must denote more than Anglo-Saxon whiteness; otherwise, Englishness will become a meaningless, dead category, which only racists attempt to raise ghoulishly from the earth.

The rising spectre of English nationalism is the MultiKultists’ worst nightmare, and the principal reason why they labour so assiduously to (a) deny it exists and (b) eradicate and/or emasculate whenever and wherever it does appear.

Posted by Dan Dare on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:17 | #

Basically, the public (private) schools invented it to calm down the natural high energy levels of young boys, who in a natural setting would be out there in nature climbing trees, fighting imaginary enemies, forming gangs (in the old sense), playing at being soldiers and doing all the natural ‘boyish’ things.

When I was growing up we did all those things, and played footie too. More often than not our football involved no adult involvement whatsoever, just groups of lads, a ball and two piles of coats for goalposts.

I don’t recall feeling particularly deprived at the time.

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:33 | #

Small boys in the park, jumpers for goalposts…

Posted by Football not soccer! on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:00 | #

The English are beyond being able to repair their own country. I think a ‘28 weeks later’ type scenario where US troops are sent in to “sanitise” the island is the best alternative. I particularly like the scenes where the American snipers open fire on a crowd of Brits! As you would have guessed, I absolutely dislike the Brits and wish that the isle would sink into the sea before it takes the rest of the Western world down with it.

Angry beard makes no frikkin sense whatsoever.

On a related note, the France v/s Uruguay match was funny - and not only because the French sucked. It was indeed funny seeing that the South American team was whiter than Le Blues!

I wish the Argentinians and the Spanish all the best for the Cup!

Posted by Dan Dare on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:12 | #

Nobody appears to be immune to the Rising Tide. Even Denmark fielded a darkie yesterday, and Germany had an Arab, a Turk and a Schwarze on the field at one point.

So far the whitest teams have been Argentina, Italy and the two from the FRY.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:31 | #

to be English must denote more than Anglo-Saxon whiteness

Interesting to note the Anglo-Saxon whiteness (WASP) is apparently unassailable to the multi-cult. It fits nicely with Drew Fraser’s recent thoughts:

WASPs can no longer depend upon the nation-state either as the fons et origo of their collective identity or as the guarantor of individual and collective security.

Posted by Gussie Fink-Nottle on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:05 | #

Dan and GW, I’m not sure how white the Argentinean team really is.

You have to play it by eye with the Argentinians.  Many of their players are unambiguously white. 

Others I’m not so sure about.  Carlos Tevez, for example, looks Amerindian to me. 

Sadly, it seems Italy and Spain are the only European teams without a single non-white.  I had high hopes for Denmark, as I watched one of their qualifying matches and it appeared that the entire team was fair and blonde.  I guess they were saving the negro for the main event. 

It was great to see Italy beat les nègres in 2006.  France is the team I would most enjoy to see gone (sorry, Armor).

I root against the French more than I root in favor of any team.

Posted by Gussie Fink-Nottle on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:07 | #

Whoops, forgot about the FRY.

Posted by Armor on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:21 | #

“France is the team I would most enjoy to see gone (sorry, Armor).”

Me too! I’m not French: my country, Brittany, is occupied by France, which is occupied by the third-world. The French team has one Breton player, Yoann Gourcuff, but he is not popular among his non-white team mates. There is political pressure by the anti-white lobbyists to hire non-whites in French soccer teams, but there is also a phenomenon of white flight. With so many non-whites, the soccer schools are no longer white-friendly places. In local clubs, tournaments have become more violent. French newspapers have been hinting in recent months that some (non-white) players in the French national team are lacking in team spirit. Gourcuff is probably isolated in the French team because he is white.

Posted by Andrew Flook on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:15 | #

I almost kicked my TV screen when I saw the Umbro advert. Then my posts were removed from their You Tube website. Yet some MultiCult comic is advertising his show trashing England and while voices of English nationalism are censored. But we WILL NOT be denied!

Posted by Bill on Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:55 | #

There’s more to this World Cup than just football.

Thursday 24 June 2010

“It it ethical to support In-ger-lund?  No, of course it isn’t - but so what? Let’s keep football out of politics.

Now that England have limped through the World Cup qualifying round to a knock-out meeting with ‘the old enemy’, Germany, on Sunday, the plastic red-and-white flags are flying higher all over the country. Also on the rise, however, are doubts among liberal-minded and left-thinking commentators about whether it is ethical or politically acceptable to join in the mood of football patriotism.

It seems that any apparent wave of flag-flying nationalism in England or Britain raises the spectre of the old politics of race and empire. With one tabloid already splashing ‘Job done – bring on the Hun!’, some are casting fearful glances back to the clash between England and Germany in the European championships of 1996, when the Daily Mirror was widely and officially castigated for running the ‘inflammatory’ and ‘offensive’ headline, ‘For you, Fritz, ze Euro ’96 is over!’ (which some of us thought was just a tired old joke). On the other hand, no doubt some are secretly glad that they can indulge their more politically correct prejudices about the Germans rather than having to face a ‘colonial’ contest between England and Ghana.[/quote”]

Full story…

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/9074/

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:07 | #

Well, thank heavens that’s all over.  But only until Brazil 2014.  Brazil, of all places with which to follow the supposed rainbow nation!  You could be forgiven for thinking the fix was in.

Posted by Irish Anti-Commie on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:08 | #

I was glad to see the multicult thugs of Holland being defeated by the brilliant Spanish team. Spain had no black players. Their only player from a protected minority was a gypsy, Jesus Navas. The racist Spanish win the World Cup and the multicult England are humiliated. So much for anti-racism.

Posted by Armor on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:12 | #

“and the multicult England are humiliated.”

Not as much as the multicult France.

Posted by Irish Anti-Commie on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:47 | #

@Armor, I was glad to see the cheat Henry and his Afro-French team lose too. Needless to say they’re not too popular in Ireland. At least the English made an honest if ineffectual effort. The multicultist media would have loved Germany to win the World Cup with their large non-Aryan contingent. Unfortunately for them Spain did’nt read the script.

Posted by Footiefox on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:14 | #

Unfortunately for them Spain did’nt read the script.

Love that line! After the Euro victory two years ago, this is a fitting reward to a team composed of some of the most gifted players of this generation…and their being the only ‘true’ European team (maybe Italy too, but their performance was quite shabby) just increases my respect for them!

After all the hype over ‘Africa’ this world cup, the top scorers - Muller, Forlan, Villa and Sneijder - are all whities.

Posted by Dan Dare on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:42 | #

I had been planning to open a separate thread about the English debacle in this year’s tournament, but was uncertain about the degree to which readers were interested in the socio-political aspects of football. Since there seems to be some ongoing interest I will append my thoughts on the matter here.

My own view is that England’s chances were doomed from the start since its squad (initially) included 10 out of 23 players of Afro-Caribbean background, second only to France in its duskiness. Despite their individual abilities, which many of they demonstrate regularly for their multiracial club teams in the English Premier League, the fact of the matter is that black players have, historically, been dismal underperformers for the English national team.

I put this down to two factors. First the demonstrable lack of bottle on the international stage and second, and most important, the fact that they know in themselves that that are not really English and it is this lack of innate patriotism that places an upper bound on their contribution and, more damagingly, transmits itself to their indigenous team-mates.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:51 | #

Fred: What’s “bottle”?

Resolve.  All the way down to the bottom of the bottle.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:36 | #

Possibly England’s poor showing was in part related to the no-show of that ethnic Irish Catholic striker, whose brother was the real patriot. 

Cheer up Danny. If Lampard’s goal counted it might have been an entirely different story. Remember the old battle cry, two world wars and one world cup!

Maybe that is one reason why England fans have been happy to include non-footballing victories when goading their German counterparts, a common terrace chant at matches between them being “Two World Wars and One World Cup” to the tune of “Camptown Races”. Similarly, when Germany were leading England 1-0 in a 2002 World Cup qualifier in October 2000 - the last match played at the old Wembley Stadium - a section of the home crowd responded to their team’s inadequacies by singing “Stand up if you won the War”;

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:14 | #

Bottle - like a boxer having ‘heart’.

Guts, courage, determination or even bare faced cheek.

If the other guys run away they are said to have ‘“lost their bottle”. Or “bottled it”, the act of giving up might also be said to be “a bottle job”. 

Someone lacking said resolve - “they havent got the bottle”.

Not to be confused with the act of dismissing the earnest artistic endevours of a musical or comedy act, through the use of whatever projecticles are found to hand, the very descriptive - ‘bottled off’.

Posted by Irish Anti-Commie on Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:54 | #

Funny how the Dutch female fans are mostly stereotypically white with blonde hair and blue eyes.
http://worldcupgirls.net/girls/dutch-soccer-girls/page/2/

And the English girls look strangely Anglo-Saxon.
http://worldcupgirls.net/girls/english-soccer-girls/

Posted by Wanderer on Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:48 | #

Posted by Armor on July 11, 2010, 11:12 PM
“and the multicult England are humiliated.”

Not as much as the multicult France.

The most laughably pathetic team was certainly France, a team with 10 of 11 starters nonwhite and the other a white(-trash) convert-to-Islam who married a Muslim [Ribery]. Slovakia shockingly went on to the second round, the lowest-ranked team in Europe or the Americas* to do so. Every player was clearly of unmixed North-Central European Stock.  (*—Diversity-less Japan and South-Korea also went on, the two lowest overall to do so).

This is all “anecdotal”, though. It would nice to prove an overall trend… :
Someone please get to work on how statistically correlated “diversity” (players with recent non-local ancestors) on a given team was with performance of the team. Perhaps relative to the teams theoretical world FIFA ranking in June 2010. Did “diverse” teams underperform or overperform relative to what would be expected?

Even to a P.C. drone, the merit of such an evaluation could be shown. As this is surely a (quasi-)nationalistic international tournament, local ancestral-ties/allegiances are obviously important.