Rhiannon Harries, anti-racist, dangerously vague wordsmith
Hat-tip to Simon Darby for this one. It’s a short review of Laura Fairrie’s The Battle for Barking by an Independent journalist named Rhiannon Harries who, I must say, I don’t know but Darby fingers as a “self-proclaimed anti-racist”.
The review itself is worthless, containing nothing more elevated than a few cheap, boorish jibes at the BNP. Until we get to this arresting thought in the closing paragraph:
Everybody was at pains to stress that they weren’t racist and, on a fundamental level, I believed them. Immigration had simply become the prism through which local and national ills – namely unemployment and a chronic shortage of social housing – were being refracted. Add to that a pervasive sense that those at the top simply didn’t care and the crude appeal of the BNP as a party “of the people” became clearer.
Given that we knew only too well that the programme would conclude in the satisfying trouncing of the BNP, I wondered why I felt a growing knot of anxiety in my stomach as I watched. Perhaps it was the realisation that, even if the BNP has been temporarily cauterised, we still have a long way to go before we’re safely beyond the situation of which they took advantage.
Now, no doubt Miss Harries will claim that having “a long way to go before we’re safely beyond the situation of which they took advantage” simply means solving the problems of “unemployment and a chronic shortage of social housing”. But that doesn’t quite follow. A professional journalist, which Miss Harries is, would just have written “we still have a long way to go before the economy lifts people out of unemployment and the local housebuilding programme provides them with decent homes, and in the process deprives the BNP of its most potent political arguments.” That isn’t at all difficult to come up with. Why, then, choose such an imprecise formula as “a long way to go before we’re safely beyond the situation”? Well, it isn’t imprecise if Miss Harries is actually referring to the “situation” of a still obtaining English majority, going “beyond” which is its demographic replacement.
The BNP has claimed consistently that large numbers of Africans were moved into the constituency, added to the electoral register, and got out to vote on election day. In his blog Darby claims that “I have the electoral register to prove it.” It must be said, there is much dispute about this even among nationalists. But, plainly, a rapid process of demographic replacement in the borough is in train. Labour knows its electoral value, knows how important Barking was and is to the BNP, and would do literally anything to defeat them. Anti-racists are on record discussing white minoritisation in terms of the final defeat of “racism” and “fascism”. Miss Harries’s meaning seems clear to me. Even if she does not state that meaning publicly, she would appear to have got as close to it as she can, given that pushing us towards our grave is the hate that dare not speak its name. For now.
Posted by Scott on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:06 | #
Hello. This is a great site, I only happened upon it yesterday and I am most impressed. Good on you, and keep up the good work.
I am an Australian, and I myself have recently been raising a voice and making a stand against what has been forced upon Australia of late…things similar to that as personified by this Rhiannon Harries and the hysterical self-destruction she and others like her urge upon us.
It’s heart-warming and re-invigorating to see people such as yourselves speaking up and standing in defence of Whites and Western Civilisation!
Thanks,
Scott.