|
|
Russia is the future of Europe !The following piece was written by a French comrade of mine who is married to a Russian woman and lives in Moscow. Here is his blog: http://alexandrelatsa.blogspot.com/ Constantin
by Alexandre Latsa
” The new stage is occasionally defined as “post-American.” But, of course, this is not a “world after the US” and even less so without the US. It is a world where as a result of the rise of other global centers of power and influence the relative significance of America’s role dwindles, as was already the case over recent decades in the global economy and trade. Leadership is an entirely different question though; it’s above all the question of achieving harmony within a circle of partners, of the ability to be the first, but among equals.” “To define the content of an emerging world order, such terms as multipolar, polycentric and nonpolar are also put forward” “We do not share the concerns that the current reconfiguration in the world will unavoidably lead to “chaos and anarchy.” There goes the natural process of the formation of a new international architecture – political as well as financial-economic – which would correspond to the new realities.” “Russia conceives itself as being a part of European civilization having common Christian roots” “The rigid Anglo-Saxon model of economic and social development is again, as it did in the 1920s, beginning to wobble.the global financial-economic architecture was largely created by the West to suit its own needs. And now that we watch the generally recognized shift of financial-economic power and influence towards the new fast-growing economies, such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, the inadequacy of this system to the new realities becomes obvious. In reality, a financial-economic basis is needed which would conform to the polycentricity of the contemporary world. The manageability of world development can’t be restored otherwise.”
*****
At that time where the line breakages are less and less legible, it would be good to remember that the only chance of survival of the Europeans is to get out of the suicidal atlantist rut and to develop a true and integrated collaboration with the Federation of Russia. This European-Russian partner could contribute to peace within Heartland, in the hart of this new multi polar and decentralized world.
In a multi polar and decentralized world the European unity is unavoidable
Far from the ideal of psychology armchair, the reality of tomorrow is based on demography and economy. The decrease of America’s influence is also proved by the increase of many other actors: Brazil, Russia, India, China and the Arab Muslim world, both rich in energy and human capital. The world population reaches 6, 5 billions of inhabitants and will be over the 9 billions in 2050. Europe counts today 758 millions inhabitants 91/3 of the EU0 and should see its population fall down, between 564 millions and 632 millions inhabitants i.e. 7 % to 8% of the world population and less than 20% of the GDP (about the same than China on its own).
France as an example should count 70 millions inhabitants in 2050, i.e. 0,8% of the world population, 1 inhabitant out of 3 being more than 60 years old and half of its youngest population being mainly African and from Northern Africa.
In this context, and despite the punchy speeches of credible and interesting personalities (Nicolas DuPont Aignant, Paul Marie Couteaux or Jean Pierre Chevènement to only quote those), the way out of the EU and the return to a national sovereignty is surely the very last solution to think of.
The EU is imperfect to 99%, because being led by Brussels, and under the influence of ‘’the American party’’, who treats Europe as an American colony.
Worse the Americans (who wish first to maintain their dominating position and defend their own interests) do not want a united and powerful Europe. This Europe may not follow them in their military offensives or even oppose to them diplomatically and maybe militarily. This is the reason why the Americans try everything in order to have their Troy horse entering the EU (Turkey) in order to create dissension and destabilize a homogeneous whole on its way.
Let us not forget, at last, that Turkey is the second army of NATO and with Israel the pawn of America in the Near East, while occupying Cyprus. This is the reason why America has done everything in order to persuade De Gaulle not to obtain the nuclear independency and to stop France to exit the NATO commandment. An independent France would be a prelude to an independent Europe. The latter could lead to the worse situations for the US strategists: the loss of the advantages gained at the end of the World War II with the occupation of Western Europe and therefore the loss of the Heartland western side.
This is also the reason why some strategists of the ‘American party’ in Europe have understood the necessity to support the EU refusals through the anti EU and the Europhobic parties such as Ireland with the Libertas candidate.
More recently, the Europhobic Philippe de Villiers has also joined the atlantist party of Nicolas Sarkozy, UMP, a party though openly pro EU, after that UMP has had France joining the NATO commandment.
The loss of sovereignty for the European countries is a process that went through 2 stages.
* The first one is the end of the empires, originating from the Westphalia treaty, supporting the national identity concept (nation state) as the primary identity. This “nationalisation” of the European identities has generated the 30 years war that destroyed our continent in the first half of the 20th century. Strange coincidence, the Westphalia treaty ended a European civil war that lasted 30 years. * The second is the stage of the fragmentation into regions. This process, are we told, is very progressive politically (i.e. regions would be the ultimate stage of the European integration). But it is in fact the result of a deliberate external political process aiming at weakening Europe, by fragmenting in small pieces that are left with neither economical independence nor military sovereignty.
This was the case in particular for Eastern Europe, e.g. Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia or the USSR, for obvious reasons: Those nations are not under the western influence since long so they are suspected of being hostile to the Euro –Atlantic Axis.
Of course, it is no surprise that most of the regionalist European political parties are also the most Europhiles and the ones fighting most actively for a NATO expansion and a Euro – Atlantic integration.
Those same political alignments are shared by the Brussels commissioners, devoted agents of the American interests in Europe.
The Europe of Brussels is of course the opposite of the powerful and independent Europe that we want. The EU made of flesh, the reel EU (the non legal one) is the only aim to defend in order for the Europeans to control their destiny and to become more than spectators, to become actors.
The world of tomorrow though will probably not be a more opened world than the one we know. It surely will be a world made of blocks in conflict, conflict for territories zones and civilisations. In this world of increasing tensions the key for Europe is to gain a structure of defence that belongs to it and allows her to protect its interests and citizens. In that sense, the proposals of President Medvedev on the necessity of creating a Pan European structure of security (replacing NATO) are a real challenge and the most interesting one, for Europe.
In a multi polar world, let us exit NATO and create a continental and NON Atlantic defence’s system.
NATO is a military alliance created is 1949 in order to face USSR, but also in order to avoid a new risk to Europe (as it had been the case with Germany). Fast, this alliance, under the Anglos Saxons’ influence, led to the creation of a competing alliance in the other bloc, the soviet one, in 1955: ‘’ The Warsaw Pact’’. This double alliance split up the world in two rival blocs, until 1958 while the De Gaulle France decided to leave the Anglo Saxon block and to develop its own nuclear programme.
In 1966, France leaves the NATO commandment and the NATO HQ moves from Paris to Brussels, which is still the case nowadays. Brussels hosts the European institutions as well as the NATO ones. 30 years later in 1995, the French President Jacques Chirac started the negotiations to get back into the integrated commandment of NATO. This return was confirmed and focalized by President Sarkozy on the 17th March 2009.
Why this return ? What were the motivations of France to become an essential NATO actor ?
NATO has got today only two essential functions, both in the interest of America and both against the European interests. First it has become a conquest weapon of the Eurasian heartland by America and its extension towards the East and the Russian borders. New nations are asked to join under wrong justifications, i.e. the historical fear of a Russian imperialism. But this imperialism does not exist any longer. Only the American strategists keep it alive at perfection.
Under the pretext of entering the Euro-Atlantic partnership, NATO installs itself in the hart of Europe, pushes Russia back towards its own eastern borders and divides Europe once more, with the installation of American bases in front of the Russian borders.
This is the real aim of the Serbia campaign. Serbia is an ally of Russia in the logic of the Pentagon. With the bondsteel base but also the orchestrated revolution in Ukraine, the aim of America was to implement an American base in Crimea, in order to respond to the Russian base.
Since the 11/09/NATO has become a crusaders army at the eyes of the Muslim world, the same American strategists trying to convince us that NATO is a protection against the aggressive and terrorist Islamism. No need though to be a scientist in order to understand that the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, if they could be won (which will probably not be the case) will not defeat ‘’terrorist’’ Islamism. Islamism is used today like an excuse in order to justify much older geopolitical objectives. Do we not suspect that the Afghanistan attack has been justified by the 11th September, but planned much before and that its reel aim had been the implementation of US troops in the heart of Eurasia?
Can we, without laughing, believe that the baathist Iraq of Saddam Hussein was one of the vectors of the world Islamist terrorism, or targeted for its petrol dwells?
Domination wars of the USA are wars aiming at controlling the natural resources that are concentrated (apart from Arctic) in the Arab peninsula, Iraq, Iran, Persian Gulf, Southern Russia (Caucasus) and Afghanistan.
Those resources conflicts are provoked by wrong motives, which are not Europe’s one. Worse, they may lead Europe to ethnical and religious tensions on ‘’its’’ territory.
Yugoslavia disintegration showed us how much a security structure was essential in order to maintain its harmony and face the external destabilizations. The recent Kosovo issue has perfectly shown that Europe is the bridge head that serves the USA who attack and invade Eurasia. America therefore creates tensions between European populations and in particular with Russia, to whom the ‘’Serbia’’ warning was addressed.
The vote of the Silk road strategy Act by the US Congress in 1999 was aimed at ‘’favouring’ the independence of the Caucasus and the Central Asian countries and at creating a land bridge in order to divert the road of the Silk Road to the Turkish harbours, therefore a NATO country.
The BATCH oil pipeline that passes by Georgia is following the same strategy and also partly explains the development of the military assistance to Georgia, since the arrival at power of Mikhaïl Saakachvili.
In 1999 despite the attack on Serbia and after 10 years of total collapse, the assumption by Vladimir Poutine straightens Russia up and replaces the country at the front of the word political scene. Europe has toppled over NATO (by its participation to the bombing of Serbia). Russia, China, and the Muslim nations of Central Asia create in 2001 the Shanghai organisation as well as the OSTC in 2002. Those military Eurasian and inter-religious alliances aim at replying to the double Chinese and Russian surrounding by the American army and at defending the Eurasian regional well defined area. Zbigniew Brezinski said: «The Eurasian strategy of the USA brought Russia and China closer. The two continental powers are building a real military alliance in order to face the Anglo Saxon coalition and its allies. »
The American offensive towards the East (from Berlin to Kiev) has materialized in two majors steps, from 1996 until 2009.
In 1996, GUUAM was born. It regroups Georgia, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldavia. Those nations wish to get out of the post soviet bosom, right after the Berlin wall fall and while Russia was collapsing. It is not surprising that those nations who have strategic geographical positions, consequently have been the victims of revolutions financed by the CIA (orange revolution, tulips, roses and recently in Moldavia too after the elections). They also have been the victims of changes of western regimes. The most representative members of this association are the observers, Turkey and Latvia (!). Nevertheless those regimes have not made it through, despite the expectations of their supporters (integration to NATO and EU, improvement of life). On the contrary, those overthrown regimes have degraded economically and no integration into the euro-atlantist model occurred.
This is the reason why the departure of Uzbekistan in 2005 and the absence of concrete realization of the organization have led the latter to become inexistent politically. In May 2006 the political scientist Zardust Alizadé from Azerbaijan expressed his doubts regarding the development of the alliance and of the alliance’s ‘’practical results’’.
Today, the second step sees a quite aggressive materialization through the creation of a new front that we may call GUA (Georgia, Ukraine, and Arctic). In Georgia: the political incapacity of the president has pushed the American strategists to launch a military operation in August 2008. This operation failed because the Russian army has replied with a lot of strength and has liberated the territories of Ossetia and Abkhazia. This conflict is the first conflict opposing Russia to America out of the Russian borders. The previous conflict had been the Whabitt destabilization in Chechnya, instigated mainly by the CIA.
In Ukraine the recent conflicts about gas show the growing tensions and a bright observer recently said that ‘’ a limited conflict, under the pretext of a territorial dispute, will surely burst and lead to a rupture of the gas’ supplies for a more or less long period of time. Those gas crises are provoked in order to train the Europeans to get used to such cuts.’’
Artic would need another article just for itself. I invite my readers to read my previous articles on the topic here and there and to consult the blog « zebrastationpolaire ».
Those manoeuvres of surroundings, of containment and of destabilization have various objectives: - To control the Black sea the Caspian and Baltic seas perimeters as they are essential zones of transit between the East and the West. - To control the future corridors of energy in particular via a building project of oil and gas pipelines going round Russia but linking the regions of the Caspian sea with the ones of the Black and the Baltic sea. Of course, a non experienced reader will tell me that the Russians and the Americans have never stopped to fight since 1945 and that globally this is not the business of Europe and of the Europeans. Well, this is exactly the contrary.
In a multipolar world with many centres, the Euro-Russian Alliance is the key stone for peace on the continent. The consequences we told you about in this article are dramatic for Europe. They will cut Europe from Russia at a civilization, geopolitical, political and energetic level. They will create a new wall in Europe, not in Berlin but in the heart of Ukraine, separating the West (under the American influence) from the East (under the Russian influence). In a more pragmatic way this fracture nearly cuts the Orthodox Europe from the catholic and protestant Europe, underlining the theory of S.Hungtinton in his book « The shock of civilisations ». Last, let us note that China, a crucial geopolitical and economical actor, probably sees Europe (through NATO) as co-responsible of the surrounding situation that it (China) faces, West (military American bases in central Asia) and East (the Pacific along its shores, with also many American bases). This rupture with two essential actors that are Russia (the biggest country in the world) and China (the most populated country of the world) are very serious.
In case of growing tensions with NATO and OCS, France and the other European countries would be in a conflict with an organisation that nearly groups together, one man out of three in the world, covers 32, 3 millions of km² et resources wise groups together 20 % of the petroleum world resources, 38% of natural gas, 40% coal and 50% uranium.
This strategy of separation of Russia and Europe and of Western and the centre will limit Europe in a micro territory slot in the west of the continent and will cut t from the huge possibilities that a partnership with Russia would offer. · Europe needs Russia energy wise because Russia has got the gas and the petroleum resources that Europe needs. Russia is a stable supplier as its relation with Turkey proves it. Turkey has no supply problem. Just remember that the supply cuts during the war with Ukraine were due to the latter, but funnily enough the media have made Russia guilty). The topic ‘’energy’’ is essential because Europe under the American commandment is proposed very risky alternatives, as for instance to replace Russia by Turkey (A NATO country aiming at becoming an EU member!). . This replacement of Russia by Turkey would also mean to have Nabbuco instead of South Stream and to participate to conflicts for energy (like Iraq). Europe could surely avoid all those troubles. · Europe needs the fabulous Russian potential, the human one (140 millions inhabitants), and the geographical one (17 millions km2 and its opening on the Pacific). Europe would therefore become a crucial actor, especially with the Asian world, the latter being in a full development process. · Russia also needs Europe and the Europeans not only for allocating its primary resources but also for its technologies and human capital that it could use to fight against it depopulation at the East of Oral. Last but not least it needs Europe like a natural and complementary ally, originating from the same civilisation.
This Euro- Russian unity is the only warrant of peace and independence for the continent populations. It is vital, it is strongly advised, because the Western European and the Russians belong to the same civilisation first of all.
As Natalia Narotchnitskaïa recently said in Paris during a colloquy:
« The real cooperation between Russia and Europe could give a new energy to our continent, at the dawn of the third millenary. The big roman – German and Russo- Orthodox cultures share one and only one apostolic foundation, the Christian and spiritual one. Europeans, whether they are western or Russians, have given to the world the biggest examples of the orthodox and Latin spirituality.’’
These are the reasons why Russia is the future of Europe.
Posted by Constantin von Hoffmeister on Saturday, October 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM in Comments:2
Posted by Multipolar Polycentric Nonpolar on October 03, 2009, 01:34 PM | # This is great stuff. A war of words featuring disordered categories of discourse, blind to the influences of the outliers, and keen to describe a brave, new world without any of the hard work on the steps to get there. We could call this the “white fantasy” sub-set of the genre of science fiction & fantasy. 3
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 02:01 PM | # Wonderful post Cladrastis! I agree with minimal reservation. I particularly like this idea:
4
Posted by Dan Dare on October 03, 2009, 03:18 PM | #
Within a few short years the majority of the population of the US will have no ancestral connection whatsoever to Europe. It already has a negro president and its foreign, economic and social policies serve to promote the interests of its Jewish minority. Why should Europeans want to have it in their club? 5
Posted by Batista on October 03, 2009, 03:35 PM | # The “Euroasianist” - whoever they may be- are clutching at empty straws. Grandiose theoretical conceptions of utter nonsense. Europe has been under american occupation ( militarily-culturally-economically and else). The occupation is still going strong and is far from ended. The EU is a decomposing carcass l, malfunctioning and corrupt to the core. The name EU is a misnomer . The Eurasianist are smoking their pipe dreams, not even them are certain of what their objectives are. Ridiculous and puerile conceptions of unemployed intellectuals of third league category. 6
Posted by inliar on October 03, 2009, 03:37 PM | # Let the Semites and Mongols have their deserts And all the oil from Aden to Ashgabat.
Très bien dit. C’est l’Hoffmeister.
7
Posted by RF on October 03, 2009, 04:06 PM | # Funny ruminations somehow reminding me that fool fukuyama with his “end of history”, not taking into account a few really important factors such as: 1. falling russian birthrate with reduction in population 600000 each year btw, i’m russian and know what i’m talking about 8
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 04:40 PM | # There is nothing wrong with declining population, it is only when it is taken in conjunction with massive third-world immigration that it becomes alarming. 9
Posted by Captainchaos on October 03, 2009, 05:04 PM | #
And you count on that, rub your hands together in anticipation of it, long for the destruction of America, which will entail the destruction your own Northwestern European blood. Instead of standing by them steadfastly, willing to aid them in any way you can, because you believe their prospect of liberation is bleak, and the potential for their use against a resurgent Western European nationalism great. Though those that yet live of them came to your aid in fighting Germany. It is despicable, it is beneath contempt. Your honor is as lacking as your loyalty. Please interpret the following as a rhetorical question: Have you every been bitch-slapped so hard across the face it made your eyes water? 10
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 05:16 PM | # It is despicable, it is beneath contempt. Your honor is as lacking as your loyalty. Apparently, the English bred out the “honor gene” during the interwar period. 11
Posted by Frank on October 03, 2009, 05:26 PM | # Dan wrote:
You don’t understand America. Obama being elected was the start of white America becoming ethnocentric. Whites were becoming so up till Bush was elected in 2000 and then 9/11 hit. Then they morphed into patriotards for 7-8 years. 12
Posted by Frank on October 03, 2009, 05:27 PM | # The future of America is Balkanisation. States don’t continue indefinitely. 13
Posted by Dan Dare on October 03, 2009, 05:31 PM | # You’re blaming the messenger, Cap’n. Americans are the architects of their own demographic demise. Only they can save themselves. But what are you doing to right the ship, yourself, personally? Incidentally, I don’t go along with your contention that the US military stands ready to involve itself in saving Europe from its nationalistic tendencies. By the time that is likely to happen, Imperial forces are going to be extremely preoccupied with domestic peacekeeping efforts in an increasingly balkanised and fractious America, a task that which will be made doubly difficult with its ranks filled with sepoys of non-European descent. It will have too much on its plate at home to concern itself with events in Europe. 14
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 05:31 PM | # Indeed, the state known as “America” does not equal the nation inside the state that is composed solely of White descendants of Europeans Christendom. 15
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 05:33 PM | # You’re blaming the messenger, Tocqueville you are not. Have you ever even been here? Have you traversed the country the last decade like I have? You don’t know shit except what you read on blogs is what I’m willing to bet. Take your message and shove it up your warm ale drinking, snooker playing ass. 16
Posted by Captainchaos on October 03, 2009, 05:38 PM | # Dan Douchebag:
You have done, nor will you be able to do any such thing.
LOL! Your lucking there is something of chivalry left in the world, I just could bring myself to strike you with a closed fist. Btw, you officious piece of shit, there is something very Jewish about your execrably cynical brand of nationalism. 17
Posted by Dan Dare on October 03, 2009, 05:41 PM | # My residential circumstances and travel experiences aside (disclosure of either would come as a major shock to you), what exactly is wrong about the message? Is America likely to become majority non-white around 2042, or is it not? Hasn’t a black man just been elected President? Do Jews exercise disproportionate influence on American politics, economics and social affairs, or do they not? If each of these is in fact true, is the trajectory I am proposing unrealistic or improbable? 18
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 05:56 PM | # My residential circumstances and travel experiences aside (disclosure of either would come as a major shock to you) It shocks me that you have a job as it shocks me every time I find out that one of our keyboard warriors does. If each of these is in fact true, is the trajectory I am proposing unrealistic or improbable? Should we go over the trajectory of England then Dan? Did you enjoy an outlawed Hot-Cross bun this year? How many Mosques do you have to cross on the way to work? What is the most popular name in England these days Dan? Or should we talk about in person Monday morn when I arrive in Heathrow? I find your petty and small nationalism boring and I, unlike a lot of people at this blog, consider the survival of Europeans as a whole the most pressing issue of the day. Believe me, I care about your shitty little island. My wife is one of you, my child is one of you, but the way your post drips with disdain for me and my people is enough to raise my hackles. America is a combination of England, Germany, some Scandinavians in the North and some Italians, Greeks and Poles in the cities so I can’t fathom why you would be happy about our possible demise. Is it because Germans are the biggest ethnic bloc left in the country? 19
Posted by Captainchaos on October 03, 2009, 06:08 PM | # Now don’t be a pussy and stop blogging here just because you have to be reminded to mind your slovenly manners Dare. I enjoy your well researched and insightful articles. Just remember to think before you fucking hint at the desirability of betraying your race. And no, your denials are not convincing. I’ll let Dan the Man finish mopping up. Oh, and stay on your side of the Atlantic and we won’t have any problems. 20
Posted by Dan Dare on October 03, 2009, 06:13 PM | #
I’m sorry if my plain speaking (a genetic endowment as a Northcountryman) offends, or my preference for simple fact over emotion and airy persiflage is found to be grating, but there we are. 21
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 06:21 PM | # It is the damnedest thing Cap’n. I now have this little radar that goes off every time an anti-German bigot starts typing… Maybe it is just crass materialism that propels them one and all? Who knows. All I know is that I can agree, that Dan is generally a commenter par excellence and I too enjoy his insightful posts but don’t anyone dare insult my people. There are factors here that are beyond our control, things we the people can’t be blamed for. In fact, the Obamessiah wasn’t just elected by America, but rather, by an international media cabal hell bent on expunging their guilty feelings for deporting some Jews to the Eastern Front. Europe had just as much to do with his rock star tour and promotion as America did. I lay the blame for Obama at the collective feet of the White race. Maybe the demographic transformation wouldn’t have occurred had we in America just defeated a foreign armada and had an entire globe to rape and pillage and markets to penetrate and exploit. Our robber barons and masters of capital had a world turned against colonialism so they were forced to colonize us since Whites are the only people extant that cannot under any circumstances be classified as victims. I’m a peasant, in understanding and property but I realize that. You, in your pompous asshole-ness, think you’ve somehow risen above the American hoi-polloi? We’re in the same boat, I suggest you just start rowing brother. 22
Posted by inliar on October 03, 2009, 06:25 PM | # 1. falling russian birthrate with reduction in population 600000 each year I’m with you up to 4. Can’t see China making such a gamble in this age, nor have the Chinese shown any indication of wanting to make one. Would have to be demonstrated by reference to the current government, and any governments likely to be formed; I don’t believe anything will be found to indicate a future land-grab in Siberia based on “rotten nukes”. The “yellow peril” didn’t pan out as the old racialists predicted, so you can probably take 5. off your list. Anyway, Russia’s a kind of hellhole, from what I’ve read / heard / seen. It’s great l’Hoffmeister has found his alma mater therein, but it holds no more promise for the rest of us than our native kwas. The future of America is Balkanisation. States don’t continue indefinitely. Right. But not all deteriorating states (here meaning demographically, not governmentally, militarily, or bureaucratically) “balkanize”, nor is “balkanization” a very coherent concept. From you guys it seems to mean: America will break up into great ethnic regions—in one or more of which we can reconstitute our race and culture unimpeded. Which is even more blandly fantastical than Constantine’s Russia, though still not as daring as Aryans colonizing the moon. I think, if we want to be as safe as we can in prescribing the future of America, we must stick rigorously to present trends, in fact trends established a century ago: increasingly darkened urban centers, liberal strongholds on the coasts and certain inner states, the continuing permeation of rural and urban spheres by Latinos, a vast deracinated / negrified outlying population of whites, and so on. What we will see is exactly what we see now: darks advancing on white living space, where the whites are completely deracinated and worthless, and increased miscegeny. There’s no chessboard-clean “balkanization” going on here. It’s across-the-board Völkerchaos. Nothing can be salvaged from this, nothing built from it, because there is no fragmentation, there is only amalgamation. Is it because Germans are the biggest ethnic bloc left in the country? So what? They don’t speak German. They don’t care about their race. They have no connection with their past beyond the annual Oktoberfest, which is stupid enough in Germany. They aren’t “Germans”, they’re Americans, and they are not viable. 23
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 06:26 PM | # I’m sorry if my plain speaking (a genetic endowment as a Northcountryman) offends, or my preference for simple fact over emotion and airy persiflage is found to be grating, but there we are. Are you happy by the prospect? I can’t help picturing you as a Mr. Lewis Prothero typing furiously and angrily… Well, the family I married into is a bunch of plain speaking Geordies from Newcastle and divers so, being accustomed to it, speak then friend! What is it? 24
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 06:32 PM | # ....Nothing can be salvaged from this, nothing built from it, because there is no fragmentation, there is only amalgamation. That whole paragraph is Malthusian miscalculation. Absolutely anything could happen and something most definitely will happen but projecting the present into the future seems naive. Too much catastrophic shit going down homie. So what? They don’t speak German. They don’t care about their race. They have no connection with their past beyond the annual Oktoberfest, which is stupid enough in Germany. They aren’t “Germans”, they’re Americans, and they are not viable. That wasn’t my point bro. It was a rhetorical device in service to the idea that Danny boy is a bit anti-German or a bit too pro-English. Catch my drift? I do appreciate the irony of dedicated materialists and Darwinians explaining to me that genetic Germans aren’t German though or that the American Irish aren’t “Irish”. Always a mine for irony MR is… 25
Posted by Guessedworker on October 03, 2009, 06:38 PM | # I’m sorry if my plain speaking (a genetic endowment as a Northcountryman) offends Red rose or white rose, Dan? Or are you a man o’ the borders? Why should Europeans want to have it in their club? European nationalisms and White Nationalism have not merely to coexist but to draw from the same well. All face the same existential threat, after all. Daniel, CC, take it easy. I don’t want the page filled up with threats of physical violence, however figurative. 26
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 06:40 PM | # I said we would talk about Monday morning GW. You’re invited 27
Posted by inliar on October 03, 2009, 06:46 PM | # Absolutely anything could happen That’s a mere rhetorical trick. Are you really that into your own daydreams, bro? and something most definitely will happen The question is why you are in the habit of reifying a “something” which “will happen”, ignoring the many things already happening. I don’t have a snappy descriptor for this kind of miscalculation, but I suspect it lay outside philosophy altogether. but projecting the present into the future seems naive. Which is exactly what you did, bro. Too much catastrophic shit going down homie. Yea, the world’s really falling apart. I’m holding onto the table as I type this. Let’s hope my wifi isn’t disturbed when your “something”—a distinct event which we can formulate, and which will undoubtedly work in our favor—happens, as it must. Always a mine for irony MR is Ugh. And snide punk Brits. But yea, I misinterpreted the last part about “Germans”. 28
Posted by danielj on October 03, 2009, 07:02 PM | # Yea, the world’s really falling apart. I’m holding onto the table as I type this. Let’s hope my wifi isn’t disturbed when your “something”—a distinct event which we can formulate, and which will undoubtedly work in our favor—happens, as it must. I don’t think it must necessarily work out in our favor and I wasn’t talking about the fucking Apocalypse. Is it so hard to extend the benefit of the doubt to your allies while trying to have a discussion? I’m saying that the present trends are unsustainable and there is, therefore, no reason to expect it to continue. unabated into the immediate future, let alone the technically remote future of 2042. The question is why you are in the habit of reifying a “something” which “will happen”, ignoring the many things already happening. I don’t have a snappy descriptor for this kind of miscalculation, but I suspect it lay outside philosophy altogether. Maybe MALDEF captures the organs of government. I’m just saying that a slow dispossession doesn’t seem like the most likely scenario in my opinion and if that does continue to be the case, I’m almost certain that some sort of White resistance will be successful at either seceding with some territory or overturning the established order and capturing government through military coup or by capturing the Republican party.
You’ve admitted as such by stating that we are in the middle of rapid and irreversible demographic decline. You’re saying we’re toast by 2042 and I’m saying that is one hell of a prediction and I could come up with a million, just as fantastic, just as dreamy, scenarios that don’t include our destruction and the coup de gras of the straight, white, American, male. So, my point stands. Fucking anything is possible and detached cynicism isn’t chic or cool. Ugh. And snide punk Brits. But yea, I misinterpreted the last part about “Germans”. Indeed! But I’m no Brit if that is what you meant. 29
Posted by Dan Dare on October 03, 2009, 07:17 PM | # But to revert to the original theme, does anyone recall Mackinder’s famous dictum: “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World.” It developed quite a following during the 1930s. Could even come back into vogue. 30
Posted by WP on October 03, 2009, 08:41 PM | # Good post. Spengler also believed that a great culture will arise in Russia sometime in the fairly near future. Are his predictions currently bearing out? I think that an emergent Russia should form a very strong alliance with Germany first and foremost. Russia must always look to Occident rather than the Orient. No other nation/ethnic group in Europe can help Russia as thoroughly as the (still) very industrious Germans; the Germans can especially help to put some of Russia’s vast territories and resources to good constructive use (which are currently majorly untapped), as well as protect Russia from further incursions of Asiatic blood. I envision a rising Russia with Germany in a strong supporting/assistance role in helping Russians to achieve their innate greatness…not the Germans ‘ruling’ over Russians as plutocratic elites as Jewry always liked to do. 31
Posted by Metal Gear / Iceman on October 03, 2009, 10:57 PM | # I wish Russia well but its survival does not insure the survival of all of Europe. A rejection of liberalism and religion for futuristic nationalism which uses any possible means to preserve ethnic integrity is the future. Even human cloning. 32
Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 03, 2009, 11:21 PM | #
Well said and let every patriotic white in this country sear that into his brain. The American nation is alive and well, hale and hearty (if a little confused and bell-rung from all these attacks on it, attacks which it never deserved or expected so never prepared for), and is NOT going down with the ship. Please take note, Jews, communists, and assorted mystery meat Mystery Meat before you start gloating too much. When we get our act together — that’s when, not if — the looks on your faces will suddenly change from gloat to something more resembling abject cowering. (I’ll be there with a digital camera to post the proof on the ‘net. Right on this site, in fact — so stay tuned. And don’t forget to smile for the camera!) 33
Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 03, 2009, 11:26 PM | #
Another extremely important piece of truth by DanielJ. 34
Posted by Wandrin on October 03, 2009, 11:28 PM | #
Agree.
Well if we win and they’re losing then we’ll have to sail over and help them out. If they win and we’re losing then hopefully they’ll sail over and help us out. If we don’t all win then eventually we’ll all lose - if not us personally then our descendents. 35
Posted by Captainchaos on October 03, 2009, 11:33 PM | # Dan Dare:
And then:
The above reveals your knowledge of the decisive role Jews have played, and are playing in the decline of America. Why then do you derisively assign sole blame to White Americans if you don’t harbor malice towards them? The reason you mention the “influence” that Jews “exercise” in America is that, clearly, you believe Jews bend the American regime to serve their own ends.
The reason you recommend that European nationalists pooh pooh the Jewish Question is that you want it to remain that way. As you suggested yourself, Jews wield substantial power in America, but why bring it up at all in the context of potential military involvement of America in quashing European nationalism unless you fear inflaming Jewish paranoia regarding a ‘return of Nazism’ as a result of which they will begin the propaganda mill running and the war drums beating yet again.
If you were loyal to us, if you were willing to risk to aid in our salvation, you would at least exhort European nationalist regimes to produce pro-White propaganda which would attempt educate our people as to the true scope and malignance of our Jewish overlordship. But you would not do that, because you are a cynical coward.
But where would all the White men have gone? What, they would not be deployed in that role? Why not, wouldn’t the regime want the most effective forces in keeping the very nation from fracturing? Unconsciously, you fear where they may be, drafted into the Army proper and deployed in Europe to crush nationalism at the behest of the Jews; whilst the mud security forces essentially hold the families of those White soldiers families hostage. Just how many White American soldiers would it take to effectively end nationalism’s final hope in Europe, five million? That number will certainly be available, and then some. 36
Posted by Captainchaos on October 03, 2009, 11:48 PM | # To sum it up, Dare bears malice for White Americans, and hopes for their destruction, because he fears the Jews will use White Americans in the form of military intervention to destroy nationalist governments that may rise in Europe. Dare does not believe White Americans have much hope for liberation, in large part because of overpowering Jewish influence. Given that, he believes the only way for Europe to live is for what will be left of White America to perish. 37
Posted by jamesUK on October 03, 2009, 11:50 PM | # New nationalist Europe wants a US centre EU imperium. Yes it’s about time MR finally posted an article discussing geo-politics also the posting I guess was more about the analysis of The only thing is which completely discounts the argument of a Russian/ European co-operative is that historically and especially know Europeans and Americans do not like Russia and the majority of the public do not see them as Europeans but a hybrid of Slavic/Mongol lineage and always in the negative vernacular. You only have to read comments posted on Russia Today comments on there YouTube channel videos or comments, blogs and newspaper commentary in western media like the 2008 Georgia conflict. http://neilclark66.blogspot.com/search/label/russophobia Mr Brezinski and western intelligence have implemented a policy for Russia and Serbia which they have enacted that goes far beyond mere pro-western energy corridors if that were the case they could have put in a compliant puppet leadership like they did in Ukraine and Georgia. They want to eliminate Russian and Serb Orthodox Christian culture through demographic shifts and redrawing the map of each country. Any European policy and attitudes towards Russia including the form of government they want to create like Bolshevism will always be negative as it will be a transference projection of Europeans views towards Russia. Russia should view itself as a Eurasian country and create an alliance between Belarus, Armenia, Eastern Ukraine, China and Kazakhstan. @RF What do you think about that RF? I take it you live in Russia not a Russia that emigrated abroad? 38
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 12:03 AM | #
Oh, I don’t know. We don’t like them because of the Cold War, but they’re fairly white. If Italians and Serbs are white, Russians pass with flying colours. 39
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 12:05 AM | #
They’re very strong in Britain too. It’s easy to assume one’s own people wouldn’t make the same mistakes when another’s in power, but he’s right that whites are the backbone holding up this obscene beast of a state. Without us, it wouldn’t continue. 40
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 12:16 AM | # Err, that should say “Jews are very strong in Britain too.” 41
Posted by Captainchaos on October 04, 2009, 12:21 AM | # JamesUK is a crank and a moral defective. Dan Dare is a dissembling moral defective. 42
Posted by Wandrin on October 04, 2009, 01:01 AM | #
There’s a rational element to that fear of course but a more allied approach would be for any nationalist government that arose in Europe to be publicly nationalist but only stealth WN and limit itself to halting immigration and removing illegals so as to avoid attack. Then in the meanwhile use whatever power and influence it had to aid and support nationalist movements in other countries - in particular North America. If/when the dominos tumbled then more would become possible. 43
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 01:21 AM | # At the risk of CC shouting “faleo” at me (I kid), I used to hear this often: When Athens (democracy) and Sparta (oligarchy) competed for power in Greece, Athens tended to overthrow oligarchs and install democracies while Sparta would do the reverse. This would be done despite what was best for each citizenry, and alliances were kept based on this ideology. Someone who stayed awake longer when reading about ancient history might add more detail, maybe even some relevant details; but apply that to our current situation: We wish to throw out race mixing populations and form ethnostates that will stand with us athwart the opposing ideology of empire that confronts us. Belloc viewed the struggle as between the Catholic Church and Leviathan. Most WN view the struggle as between whites and nonwhites. I’m somewhat more inclined to view the struggle as between ethnostates and mongrel empire, albeit with a strong leaning towards WN. Frank Salter mentioned a similar ideology: one he termed “universal nationalism”, which would include some winners and some losers in the reordering. Despite that Russia is slightly impure, it has a distinct heritage that is closely related. A Russian ethnostate could stand with us. Similarly since China appears to be a rising empire, the East Asian states that are threatened could be aided at least in trade (where mutually beneficial). This is especially relevant since Russia is at risk of invasion from China. 44
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 01:29 AM | # I admit that sounds Cold Warrish, but such could be done without taking up “the white man’s burden”. It could be done where truly within white interests. And if we’ve learned anything from the Jews, screwing over and pissing off people for no reason can lead to blowback… 45
Posted by Al Ross on October 04, 2009, 02:04 AM | # We all, surely, have a moral duty to be optimistic about White survival in the US. Despair is for cowards but hope is the province of the brave. 46
Posted by Mark IJsseldijk on October 04, 2009, 02:28 AM | #
Thank you. I’m glad that I’m not the only Yank from flyover country who shares this feeling. My fanciful and dreamy prediction is that open political racialism is only a few years away. 47
Posted by the Narrator... on October 04, 2009, 02:40 AM | #
Tell you what, if you’ll overlook Barry we’ll overlook Disraeli. However, If it is a question of America vs. England, I’d have to say America is in a better position than England. England is, quite frankly, tiny. It’s about the size of Virginia yet has a population of, what, 51 million? Or there abouts. It’s crowded there. Yet the immediate future looks like this,
And that article is two years old! Native White British make up, officially, (based on what I could deduce from available information) about 82% of the population of England. White Americans make up, officially, about 65% of the population of America. That means there are about 41 million White British in England.
Just as an example, Europe, the CONTINENT, minus Russia, is approx. 2 million sq. miles. America, the NATION, minus Alaska, is about 3 million sq. miles. That literally gives us room to maneuver. And of course America has other advantages at the moment. Everything from greater freedom of speech to the right to carry a shotgun to public meetings.
41 million White British in England . We need both a good dose of cold hard reality and a reaffirmation that the sky has not fallen, yet. The future will be what we allow or make it to be. ... 48
Posted by Texan on October 04, 2009, 02:47 AM | #
Detached cynics are without exception unserious time-wasting twats who should be completely ignored at all times. That’s the first step towards Victory. 49
Posted by Desmond Jones on October 04, 2009, 02:52 AM | # The intervention is now. It appears that Germany is second only to Iraq in the number of US troops deployed. Free Germany. Bring American troops home. 50
Posted by danielj on October 04, 2009, 05:44 AM | # Tell you what, if you’ll overlook Barry we’ll overlook Disraeli. Damn! That was fish in a barrel obvious. I missed it. 51
Posted by jamesUK on October 04, 2009, 11:20 AM | # @Captainchaos Care to elaborate in my comment of what makes me a “crank and a moral defective”. 52
Posted by Søren Renner on October 04, 2009, 12:23 PM | #
Oh, econational futurism, is that what you mean? 53
Posted by Dan Dare on October 04, 2009, 12:24 PM | #
It isn’t. 54
Posted by Dan Dare on October 04, 2009, 12:34 PM | #
Wrong on both counts. 55
Posted by GenoType on October 04, 2009, 01:30 PM | # The classist, politically disenfranchised intellectual descendants of British colonialism and the antebellum South are calling for White unity. Sounds nice, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, the reality is it masks a one-way, non-reciprocal relationship: Lower middle- and working-class whites forced to live in the cesspool are needed to elevate the easy money residents of gated communities into power by dying. Should that effort succeed, survivors among the first group only have the latter’s word on what would follow. When dealing with classists posing as racialists, the following consumer product warnings apply: The Lower Classes Merchant Banker Four Yorkshiremen 56
Posted by Q on October 04, 2009, 02:00 PM | # ROFLMAO! Good stuff GT. Humor is usually the most effective way of getting the point across. 57
Posted by Captainchaos on October 04, 2009, 02:44 PM | # JamesUK:
Just precisely why are you so very concerned with power blocks and geopolitics? Is it that pathological manifestations of those have a negative impact on the peoples they actually effect? Why are so indifferent to the genetic survival and quality of life of your own people? Desmond Jones:
America does not now have sufficient troops on the ground in Europe to suppress a nationalist revolt if that revolt were to occur in earnest. 58
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 03:46 PM | #
Am I being included in this now? Politics can at times include a few more variables, class being one of them. And I no where called for protecting the wealth of a specific class. Rather, I called for only going after those enemies of the race if taking such a route. Odd that CC may rail against the “bourgeois” while I mayn’t point out the flaws in the managerial elite… Oh my but NS was managerial, and we can’t have it being criticized! I’ve said before I didn’t think the national approach would work, that is I’m in agreement with your small community approach; and my comments on distributism were an attempt at what ought to follow for stability. Is it anti-white to think on what problems might have led to the current crisis? 59
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 03:53 PM | # GW has pointed out before that man is a tad selfish. When he’s benefiting economically, he’s going to be more apt to favour something. The design of society that led to the managerial elite which Sam Francis explained benefits from selling out its own people is worth looking at. Is it the patriotic thing to stick one’s head in the sand? Please explain. Education and a society’s ethics is probably more important. I’ve repeatedly pointed out the problems of Jews… I don’t see what sin I’ve committed. Is the fear that I put class over race? How is that even possible given my other comments? 60
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 04:02 PM | # So far as spouting off propaganda, class doesn’t exist; there is only race. But if discussing an issue seriously, politics is a battle of elites. 61
Posted by GenoType on October 04, 2009, 04:16 PM | #
If the shoe doesn’t fit, then don’t worry about it. The guilty know who they are.
Denying class differences is propaganda. The faux-racialist classists on this site will love you for it, however. 62
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 04:51 PM | #
My mistake then. I’m curious now who the other redneck is in here. I’m from an old slave owning family btw. 63
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 04:55 PM | # I guess you meant that as a generality. But outside a few eccentric Southrons, Southerners are racial through and through! (At least relative the rest of the country). As another Southron points out: Conservatism is dead. And it kills CC that he calls himself a paleo, lol. And CC might be right that that label ought be dropped, I dunno. 64
Posted by GenoType on October 04, 2009, 05:50 PM | #
Nothing personal, Frank, but some of my ancestors fought for the judeo-masonic Confederacy. Others fought for the judeo-masonic Union. Both sides Rothschild dupes. So what? The first “civil war” is over. My concern is the next one. Neither conservative nor liberal am I. Political conservatives and liberals support a social contract modified by jews who were, themselves, facilitated in their “upward mobility” by classists of predominately white hue. The stronger party controls the contract, I refuse to accept the morally inferior position of the weaker party. I am White. I oppose the contract and support writing a new one for those who are like me. In my opinion paleoconservatism can hang itself alongside its liberal brethren. 65
Posted by Q on October 04, 2009, 06:35 PM | #
I really like your steroid induced language GT, seriously.. but when or where is this next “civil war” going to occur? Surly you aren’t suggesting we can defeat Leviathan by dropping micro-community bombs on it are you? Let’s get real here. Until a charismatic strongman appears on the seen and inflames the will to survive amongst the white masses, the civil war will be contained within cyberspace. You know it, I know it. 66
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 06:44 PM | #
There might be something to appealing, at times, to those with wealth who benefit. One common example: trade protections benefit certain wealthy while harming others. An applied example…: maybe some local businessmen benefit from our coming to power in a state or county. - I trip myself up if I try to get too clever (I don’t if I write out all the variables, but I’m not going to do that for a simple reply).
Same here to be sure. The South isn’t entirely defined by the war, though of course slavery’s not a wanted heritage either. The Yanks and Europeans (often Jews) sold us the slaves though, so they’re partly guilty along with us.
Jews weren’t powerful in the US at that time I thought… The Masons were, and Jews are tied to the Masons; but regardless… 68
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 06:50 PM | # I don’t want to redivide North and South btw. The South is relatively pure (old stock northwest European), and the roots found from the continuous habitation and culture there are valuable. I trace back to before the Revolution, and many other Southerners do too. Up ‘till recently, we missed much of the immigration waves. Though now we’re flooded with new whites (often from fringe areas), and we’ve got fast breeding uppity blacks and Mexicans moving in too. Some mixing did occur with low class whites and blacks, but most of that seems to have melted into the African stock. Southerners are famous for spotting part negros, though I’m admittedly bad at it… The one drop rule is still how many of us think, though really that’s a little extreme (I’d tolerate a few Italians and Eastern Europeans provided they’re few in number). 69
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 06:52 PM | # Anyway GT, I’m not looking to waste your time with quibbles. I’d originally just wanted to be sure I hadn’t fallen on your bad side, because usually I’m in agreement with you. 70
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 06:57 PM | # Q, GT or others in his idealistic community (which to some extent likely will become a reality if he continues pursuing it) would raise such leaders. Spinning wheels on mass politics accomplishes nothing. Even James Edwards, linked earlier who is stirring up ethnonationalism, likely has a child or two he’s raising properly. I know some of his cohosts do. I don’t get the angst against GT in here. We need breeders! Go make some white babies. 71
Posted by Q on October 04, 2009, 06:58 PM | #
Don’t be such a pussy, Frank. GT never did respect wusses. 72
Posted by Frank on October 04, 2009, 07:05 PM | # I’m not backing down on any point there. Let’s not waste time discussing how to impress Internet stranger “GenoType”... 73
Posted by jamesUK on October 04, 2009, 08:22 PM | # @Captainchaos Just precisely why are you so very concerned with power blocks and geopolitics? Is it that pathological manifestations of those have a negative impact on the peoples they actually effect? Why are so indifferent to the genetic survival and quality of life of your own people? Geo-politics has an effect on nations where changing the ethnic composition of a country suits the geo-politic conquest of the host nation historically like the Serbs in Kosovo under various regimes Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Communist and US. So who is this boogey man that wants to destroy western civilisation the most powerful economic, miltary and area block in the world? 74
Posted by jamesUK on October 04, 2009, 08:38 PM | # @Captainchaos
Geo-politics has an effect on nations where changing the ethnic composition of a country suits the geo-politic conquest of the host nation historically like the Serbs in Kosovo under various regimes Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Communist and US. So who is this boogey man that wants to destroy western civilisation the most powerful economic, miltary and area block in the world? 75
Posted by SM on October 04, 2009, 08:50 PM | # >I don’t want to live in Russia’s nouveau KGB-Staat. Does any of you?
76
Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 04, 2009, 09:14 PM | # JamesUK thinks everything stays the same after the race has changed, including “geopolitics”: geopolitics continues exactly as it always has without missing a beat when the only countries left are Haiti, Pango-Pango, and the Central African Republic. When those are the only countries left, world geopolitics will be indistinguishable from the days when there was Great Britain, Russia, Germany, France, and the United States. No difference. None, according to JamesUK. He’s a brilliant, brilliant man. 77
Posted by GenoType on October 04, 2009, 09:15 PM | #
No problem, Frank. I know this. And yes, the big picture is my greatest concern.
It all due to my rude, crude, socially unacceptable “snipes.” Conservatives can’t stomach it. Be assured, the gov-military types analyzing MR’s commentariat realize this as well. Oops, there I go posturing and creating more angst! ;P 78
Posted by Q on October 04, 2009, 09:40 PM | #
Spoken like a true trailer park blue-blood. LOL Just kidding, GT. 79
Posted by jamesUK on October 04, 2009, 09:54 PM | #
Yeah that’s exactly what I said didn’t I. “At the start of World War I, Kosovo was 90% Serbian. Kosovo Muslims supported the Central Powers in World War I and the Nazis in World War II. Hence, through this violence and a higher birthrate, the Serbian population in Kosovo was only about 40% by 1950. This policy was continued under Tito, who wanted a Kosovo separate from Serbia so as to dilute Serbian power in Yugoslavia, an overriding obsession of the late dictators’. Starting in the late 1980s, Albania launched a complete blitz on Kosovo, providing subsidies for all families to immigrate there.” http://www.rusjournal.com/faqkosovo.html There is no real danger apart from Russia of the countries you speak of becoming predominantly non-white the powers that be are not going to commit suicide and the power structure from media ownership to banking, film production, academia, politics are white. 80
Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 04, 2009, 11:33 PM | #
Oh, so the commentariat here can all go home, there’s not really any problem. We were mistaken. The problem will be taken care of by “the powers that be,” who “are not going to commit suicide.” (Suicide? OK but what about genocide? Will they commit that?) Somehow I feel so much better now that JamesUK has reassured me. I think ........................ 81
Posted by Al Ross on October 04, 2009, 11:34 PM | # “There is only one thing that makes a race - that is blood” Benjamin Disraeli (1840) Let’s hear Obama’s Mulatto version of BD’s eternal truth. 82
Posted by Al Ross on October 04, 2009, 11:36 PM | # The power structure in Russia depends on a ruthless gang of billionaire oligarchs, all of whom are Jews. 83
Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 04, 2009, 11:40 PM | # Al Ross’s comment of 3:36 is getting close to being true of the United States. 84
Posted by Al Ross on October 05, 2009, 01:09 AM | # I think some of the American commentators might enjoy this tale, from Prozium country, of attempted “redneck”- baiting. I certainly did. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/features/article6858884.ece 85
Posted by Desmond Jones on October 05, 2009, 02:39 AM | # Ahmadinejad:
86
Posted by Desmond Jones on October 05, 2009, 02:49 AM | #
Who do they fear? Legio Ferrata? 87
Posted by Al Ross on October 05, 2009, 02:57 AM | # Ahmadinejad is a Jew, and not the first of his tribe to lead a Muslim country. Turkey’s Kemal Ataturk was a Donmeh. Of course,truth remains truth whatever its source, so your Ahmadinejad quote, Desmond, is a classic. 88
Posted by jamesUK on October 05, 2009, 03:47 AM | #
I would like to see the latest census of the countries you consider are about to be “genocided” I doubt you will provide that information as it will invalidate your argument. 89
Posted by Al Ross on October 05, 2009, 04:53 AM | # Do you know what a census is, jamesUK? Allow me to inform you that it is an official count of population, not some political pollster shystering. Your grasp of Euroman’s immigration - induced difficulties seems almost as sound as your understanding of the English language. 90
Posted by Al Ross on October 05, 2009, 05:32 AM | # The number of illegals in the EU and US,jamesUK, make a nonsense of any ‘census’, to put it even more plainly than above. The Algerians, post - independence, offered the perfectly legal White settlers a stark choice, viz., ‘the suitcase or the coffin’. In sensible Singapore, illegal immigrants are caned, jailed and repatriated, so that model is the one a West with guts should follow. Naturally, I have no deeply seated objection to emulating the latter part of the post - colonial Algerians’ Hobbesean ( or perhaps Hobson’s) Choice in the matter of repeat immigration law offenders. 91
Posted by Steven E. Romer on October 05, 2009, 06:35 AM | # Like Danielj, I think this is a GREAT solution! I would have NO reservations about immigration as long as sterilization was the #1 requirement. They would not even have to be nameless or second-class… QUOTE: “Then we’ll drop a real iron curtain across the globe. Every people within our sphere of influence who is not of our race should be given two choices: leave or stay behind as a sterile, nameless, second-class citizen (but enjoy the benefits of spending your last days in a clean, well-managed, and low-crime state).” 92
Posted by Gladiator on October 05, 2009, 11:24 AM | # I like some of the comments, however from a realistic point of view I would like to comment. First if the world ids to be divided into a racial bipolar world then obviously all white Americans of European heritage must unite with the rest of the white Europeans. 93
Posted by inliar on October 05, 2009, 04:06 PM | # Do I get to marry (and control) a teenage niece without being criminalized as the most heinous of criminals in history? In the best of all possible worlds? Yes. 94
Posted by phil on October 07, 2009, 11:11 AM | # the Narrator- You mention England’s lack of space as proof that we are in a worse position than America which has ‘room for manoeuvre’. But could it not be the other way round? Perhaps the fact that we cannot run away, and have our backs to the wall, will mean that the problems simply cannot be allowed to fester? Also, you quote statistics about the areas of my country that have been heavily enriched. But many of these are Muslim rather than the blacks and Mexicans of America. Muslims have the advantage that many of them do not want to intergrate, they are openly antagonistic to European civilsation and are organised and dedicated enough, and have enough foreign money, to constitute a real threat to the State in a way that blacks or Mexicans probably couldn’t. Both of these factors are causes of optimism for me, rather than pessimism. Having said that, I wish to stress that I am only writing this as I find the subject interesting, I am not trying to get into a ‘your future is bleaker than ours’ scenario, as I hold all white countries dear and would not wish to see any become non-white. Next entry: The New White Nationalism in America - a critique Previous entry: Civ Collapse Silver Lining |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Optigmata commented in entry 'More thread wars' on 05/24/12, 11:08 AM. (go) (view) payday loans commented in entry 'ANTI-JEWISM: The Deadly Plague of White Nationalist Slave Morality' on 05/24/12, 10:27 AM. (go) (view) Verlene Zumwalt commented in entry 'Ireland Worshipping at the Holocaust Shrine' on 05/24/12, 10:16 AM. (go) (view) Cobus commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 05/24/12, 10:14 AM. (go) (view) pay day loans commented in entry 'Heidegger: The West Texas Translation' on 05/24/12, 09:59 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 09:49 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 08:54 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:41 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:18 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:53 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:48 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:32 AM. (go) (view) Guest commented in entry 'The Torment of the Mulattoes' on 05/24/12, 06:17 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:23 PM. (go) (view) 7 Year BA commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 09:19 PM. (go) (view) DARYL commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/22/12, 08:57 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 08:31 PM. (go) (view) Church of Jed commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 07:40 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by cladrastis on October 03, 2009, 12:55 PM | #
I’m sick of reading Eurasianist (whoever the hell they represent) rantings about this fabulous new “multipolar world” we live in. Such language is code-speak for the waning of European domination of this planet (whether that domination is Russian, West European, or American). And hmmm I wonder if that whole European Christian ethic (which according to the author culturally unites the Eurosphere) of “turn the other cheek”, and “what is man that thou art mindful of him”, and “we are one in Christ” has anything to do with the current liberal malaise of our collective civilization (and its concomitant decline)?
Stop drawing lines between America, Russia, and the rest of Europe. We are many nations, but one race. Almost every commenter on this site is aware that our survival (for the long duree) depends on acknowledgment of this fact and praxis based upon it. And most of us know that it is not the “Americans” or the “Russians” but our leaders and the cultural distorters who are responsible for the crisis of our civilization.
I’m not sure I would go as far as Norman Lowell in promoting “two white bands ringing the globe” (there are ecological and historical reasons for this), but I certainly believe that the entire Holarctic should be within our sphere of influence. Let the Semites and Mongols have their deserts (and good luck to the rest of ‘em). We’ll take the abundant fresh water of the northern glaciers and icebergs. Then we’ll drop a real iron curtain across the globe. Every people within our sphere of influence who is not of our race should be given two choices: leave or stay behind as a sterile, nameless, second-class citizen (but enjoy the benefits of spending your last days in a clean, well-managed, and low-crime state). That’s it. We’ll see if the third world opens its arms warmly to a flood of multicultural asylum-seekers as the racist Eurosphere has done.
But the clock is ticking…it’s time to get on the same page.