Smart fraction ... less smart fraction ... dumb fraction

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 27 January 2007 18:52.

La Griffe could have told them.  So, doubtless, could messers Rushton and Jensen.

From the Independent:-

White students do ‘better’

Black and Chinese students are less likely to get top university degrees than their white contemporaries, a government report has found.

The study suggested that ethnic minority undergraduates faced “a considerable cost” as a result because students who get first-class degrees increasingly command higher salaries.

... The gap was widest for black Caribbean, black African and Chinese students.  The analysis took account of factors such as gender, prior academic performance, subject studied and deprivation levels.

The study sample was huge: 65,000.  One would, of course, expect that as a fraction of their respective populations Chinese participation in higher education would surpass whites.  But one would also expect that Gauss would get ‘em in the end, and the best degrees will go where the right-hand curve is longest.

However, this being a government study I doubt that Jews were eliminated from the “white” contingent.  Also, South Asians weren’t mentioned at all - perhaps because on average Pakistani students could be expected to weight SA results downward, and the distribution was, therefore, unremarkably general.

I must admit to being puzzled by the report’s finding that women out-perform men, though.  That is calling Gauss a thorough-going liar, so what’s at work here?



Comments:


1

Posted by nz conservative on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:47 | #

In my view, women have better memories and are better at soaking up information. Males however, are better critical thinkers and are more likely to be spectical about what they are taught.

Most people i know that have a lot of common snese also have mediocre memories.


2

Posted by Desmond Jones on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:13 | #

LaGriffe writes:

At Georgia Tech a University task force reports the following:

  “As part of a leading education and research institution in the nation, the College of Engineering at Georgia Tech will provide an environment conducive for women to pursue successfully and in a professional manner an engineering education and career.”

Seems harmless enough but let’s look at how Georgia Tech increases enrollment of women engineers. It uses a favorite trick of the gender-equity crowd. They manipulate entrance requirements. In 1992, the Engineering School at Georgia Tech weighted the math SAT score 9.5 times greater than the verbal SAT score in the admissions formula. These relative weights were assigned on the basis of a grade-predicting regression analysis. Two years later in 1994, the admission index weighted the math score on the SAT only 3.8 times as much as the verbal score. Four years later in 1998, application essays and leadership ability were included in the admissions formula. Because women scored significantly lower than men on the math SAT, Georgia Tech manipulated admissions criteria to de-emphasize mathematical ability, and included new subjective criteria. Between 1994 and 1997 Georgia Tech established a double standard for admissions. In this period entering female students averaged 29 points (about 0.3 standard deviation) lower than their male counterparts on the math SAT. The same game is played at hundreds of colleges and universities across the country.

Graduate schools are also swept up in the gender-equity game. A movement to increase graduate degrees among women in engineering and science is vigorous and widespread. These efforts have substantially narrowed the numerical gap between men and women new PhDs. Women currently account for more than 45 percent of new PhDs in the biological sciences. Attempts in the more mathematically based disciplines have been less successful.

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/women_and_minorities_in_science.htm


3

Posted by onetwothree on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:13 | #

The study presumably includes worthless soft degrees like Education, pyschology, etc?


4

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:26 | #

Ah, an answer.  Yes, the people who gave us Media Studies certainly won’t exclude same for the purposes of agreeing with Richard Lynn’s latest estimates.


5

Posted by john ray on Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:02 | #

See here:

http://users.bigpond.net.au/jonjayray/educ.html


6

Posted by who on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37 | #

Kills you all knowing Jews do better than “whites,” doesn’t it?


7

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19 | #

Bad choice of words.  Try to employ that famous semitic verbal IQ, always assuming that Nature didn’t play a cruel trick on you, and leave you out of the brain game.

Really, the answer to you, and all racist Jews, is that you have not had the moral worth to employ your intelligence to constructive ends.  And you have not been sufficiently intelligent to fool enough of us - meaning all of us.  We can, to quote James’ favourite film-maker, SEE.

How does it feel to be named, little hate-monger?


8

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:31 | #

What must really knaw at the soul of the supremacist Jew, with all the great intellectual power they possess, and indeed all Jews, is the fact that the same whites that condemned them to hell (Arbeit Macht Frei) are those that brought them salvation.


9

Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:47 | #

“Kills you all knowinh Jews do better than Whites”?

Well, Israel’s Sephardic majority do not “do better than whites”, so perhaps the hybrid Ashkenazim’s White blood partially accounts for their intellectually superior performance.

Of course, the White blood present in the Ashkenazim isnt sufficient to negate the millennial, Talmudically- mandated, atavistic immorality of the Chosenites.


10

Posted by who on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:27 | #

What is it like going through life so angry?  How can life be pleasurable when your only pleasure is in hate and anger?  I genuinely feel sorry for those who post on this web site.


11

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:55 | #

I genuinely feel sorry for those who post on this web site.

Why do you think those who post on this web site even care what you think or give a damn about your sympathy?


12

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:03 | #

Angry? Yes, at times, as all sentient beings can become, and usually with the same old crew of White-society wreckers -  Jews and the dupes whom they cozen in their perpetual alien effort to reign supreme in countries in which they have no right to be present.

“How can life be pleasurable”?  Life, for the most part, is agreeably pleasurable, (thanks for asking), as it is for many other rather pampered Far East expats.  I have 2 Filipina domestic “helpers”, or maids, as they were formerly known, and, thanks to my informal tutorials, they now realise that Jews and their insane Palestine landgrab are the main reasons for the bloody Islamic insurgency which afflicts their native land.

  Like the Chosen Tribe method of traversing the Red Sea, your worldview is pedestrian.


13

Posted by alex zeka on Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:18 | #

I for one feel pity for anyone who thinks that: “Kills you all knowing Jews do better than “whites,” doesn’t it?” is a meaningful sentence. Can I have that again, only in English? (As I have to say ever more frequently, due to my university’s decision to start hiring almost exclusively superannuated cockle-pickers.)



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Just a personal word of “thanks” to all the vectorists out there
Previous entry: Frontierist News Roundup 20070126

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:42. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:21. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:50. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:13. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:09. (View)

affection-tone