Still not en vogue

Posted by Desmond Jones on October 15, 2009, 07:13 PM | #

From the awesome Oz, the “Jackson Jive”.

Posted by fsdfdfdssdf on October 15, 2009, 09:29 PM | #

The vogue girl looks like an east african black, or some kind of south indian with that makeup.

Why that’s on the level of blackface, I have no clue.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 15, 2009, 10:34 PM | #

“The vogue girl looks like an east african black, or some kind of south indian with that makeup.”  (—fsd)

No she doesn’t actually, not either of those.  Looking at all closely, there’s only one thing she can be with that facial bone structure, those eyes, that head, and those soft-tissue contours of the face and even the limbs and body, and that’s a northwest-European woman and it’s not even close once you’ve scrutinized it.  Precisely that question was the first thing I paid attention to on looking at the photo — that and

wishing I’d been the one who applied the full-body make-up, and imagining what it would be like doing it

(forget that last bit there, that crossed-out bit, just forget that, pay no attention — it got in there somehow by accident).  In fact that could be the real reason all the Negro women are so outraged by such a seemingly innocent, harmless, inoffensive fashion photo idea — it’s proof-at-a-glance that these fashion-conscious Negro women who are dying to seem physically white can never succeed, for the same reason the white girl fails to seem Negro:  “What’s bred in the bone breeds true in the flesh.”  Now, that’s not saying women of other races can’t possess their own beauty.  Of course they can.  It’s just that it can never be white beauty.  Ever.

And this fashion-photo shoot unwittingly rubs that in.

Posted by Steven E. Romer on October 16, 2009, 04:10 AM | #

I immediately knew it was a white woman made-up. If you saw albino blacks with their white afros, even with their heads shaved they are immediately recognizable as blacks even though they are white. Their skull shape is very different and their facial features are too. Just goes to show that black and white are deeper categories than simple skin-color—which the race-deniers like to focus on. The true relevance of skin color is as a great indicator of environmental history of a people (living naked in the sun) which also indicates that they may have some behavioral differences selected for in their differential environs (like every other creature on Earth).

Posted by fellist on October 16, 2009, 06:13 AM | #

I saw the last moments of a trailer for an upcoming series on Channel 4, “Race: Science’s Last Taboo”—I thought Rushton, Lynn etc… not quite!

http://blogs.channel4.com/thetvshow/2009/10/14/race-sciences-last-taboo/

Channel 4 has just announced details of a new season that aims to debunk the myth that science can support notions of racial superiority.

But some truths may yet emerge:

Rageh Omaar kick starts the season on 26 October with Race and Intelligence: Science’s Last Taboo – a documentary that sets out to find the truth, featuring the views of scientists who believe that races can be differentiated, as well as those who vehemently oppose the view.

I cannot discover from the links who the honest scientists featuring in the program are.

Other shows:

On 27 October, The Human Zoo: Science’s Dirty Secret explores the 19th and 20th century phenomenon of human zoos where thousands of ‘exotic’ and indigenous people from all over the world were put on display – intended not merely as entertaining freak shows but also scientific demonstrations of racial difference.

The Event: How Racist Are You? (29 Oct) sees controversial former schoolteacher Jane Elliott recreate the shocking exercise she used 40 years ago to demonstrate how susceptible we can all be to bigotry, and what it feels like to be on the other side of arbitrary discrimination.
In Is It Better To Be Mixed Race? (Nov 1), geneticist Aarathi Prasad sets out to challenge this idea of racial purity and examines provocative claims that there are in fact biological advantages to being mixed race.

And relevant to this post:

Finally, Bleach, Nip, Tuck: The White Beauty Myth (Oct 29 and 5 Nov at 10pm) examines the emerging trend for deracialisation surgery through the stories of six people who want to westernise their bodies and faces. It is right for a person to want to erase their inherited ethnic features to fit in to a predominantly white society?

Posted by Anon on October 16, 2009, 06:26 AM | #

There’s Only One Race The Human Race

[URL=http://img48.imageshack.us/i/sciamdec03.jpg/][IMG]http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/7262/sciamdec03.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Posted by GoyAmongYou on October 16, 2009, 06:27 AM | #

Posted by Anon on October 16, 2009, 10:26 AM | #

There’s Only One Race The Human Race

[URL=http://img205.imageshack.us/i/sciamdec03mod.jpg/][IMG]http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8643/sciamdec03mod.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Fix’d

Posted by Dasein on October 16, 2009, 06:50 AM | #

Looks like it will be a good Channel 4 series.  Hopefully it’s available on YouTube. 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/6327171/Scientists-claim-black-people-less-intelligent-than-whites-in-Channel-4-show.html

Two of the honest scientists are going to be Rusthon and Lynn.  Who’s going to represent the environmentalist side, I wonder?  Channel 4’s diversity czar is apparently satisfied with their efforts:

Oona King, Channel 4’s head of diversity and former Labour MP, said the programme shows conclusively “that you cannot link race to IQ”.

I’m guessing these experts from the other side are the production editors

Posted by Dasein on October 16, 2009, 06:55 AM | #

Although I have to say, with the way she’s stated it she’s sort of correct.  The direction of causality is race -> IQ.  So, a bit of subtle obfuscation.  This is how they win!

Posted by Dasein on October 16, 2009, 07:02 AM | #

Finally, Bleach, Nip, Tuck: The White Beauty Myth (Oct 29 and 5 Nov at 10pm) examines the emerging trend for deracialisation surgery through the stories of six people who want to westernise their bodies and faces. It is right for a person to want to erase their inherited ethnic features to fit in to a predominantly white society?

Possbile new directions and implications for this ‘emerging trend’ are discussed here:

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_specter_of_genetic_communism/

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Sallis-Cuckholdry.html

Posted by Dasein on October 16, 2009, 07:09 AM | #

Further to Dan’s point in the 5-years MR comments, it’s a shame that JWH left, whatever his reasons.  Some have complained about the noise and the negative impact of GW’s open-door policy on commenting.  I’ve been reading this blog pretty steadily for almost a year now, and I don’t see this problem as anything but minor.  It’s very easy to filter out the crap yourself.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 16, 2009, 07:29 AM | #

“There’s Only One Race The Human Race”  (—‘Tard Among You)

OK let’s draw this ‘tard out — in the other thread the comrades were talking about the need to try to draw the ‘tards into debate if only to demonstrate to onlookers they haven’t any position whatsoever.

Anon/‘TardAmongYou:  blinded DNA analysis conducted in a way which assumes nothing, pretends no knowledge whatsoever of any genetic groupings, still less of the existence of anything called races, ends up classifying volunteers as members of distinct genetic groupings which correspond exactly to both the traditional races your side denies and to the self-reported races of the volunteers.  What do you make of that, ‘tard?  Lewontin’s argument that races don’t exist because “there’s more genetic variation within than between races” didn’t take into account genetic correlation structure and is universally considered a fallacy.  Was that your grounds for denying race?  If so, it’s been debunked by everybody.  Is “clines” your reason?  Denying races on the basis of clines is debunked by ordinary common sense:  groups exist notwithstanding intermediate types or blurring at the margins.  On what grounds, exactly, do you deny the evidence of your own two eyes that humans are divided into different races?  As for the genetic basis of this division:  will a Chinese couple no matter where on the planet it lives have a Negro baby or a Negro couple a Chinese baby, or will each couple no matter in which continent it lives have only its own kind of baby?  Does that thought experiment tell you something genetic is going on there, ‘tard?  Please do respond.  Please don’t just slink away.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 16, 2009, 07:36 AM | #

Oops, glancing back I see I may have misinterpreted Goy Among You’s post as joining Anon’s in denying race.  Sorry about that, Goy!  Consider my comment above to be addressed only to Anon then.  Please do reply, Anon.  Don’t just slink away.  Stay and defend yourself — we want to expose you for the ‘tard you are and you want to expose us for the ‘tards we are, right?  OK, let’s have at it, and see who wins.

Posted by pos46ition on October 16, 2009, 08:18 AM | #

The Ethiopid from the German show is of better race than the lanky, mannish Nordic thing in the first photo. Sorry to say. If you put the Ethiopid in “whiteface”, you’d have a better-looking white girl than the weirdo Nord. Not all Nords are handsome; they can be distinctly ugly, like negroes at the other pole. I’d bet most of us here are closer to the Ethiopid genetically than the Nord, too, which means that apart from the darker skin, we’d be more suited to breed with the former—if race really is more than skin color. And that isn’t to advocate mixing with Ethiopes.

Posted by fellist on October 16, 2009, 08:27 AM | #

Is JWH now Ted Sallis or do they just cover a similar beat? (I know he, JWH, used to be Rienzi)

Posted by pos46ition on October 16, 2009, 08:28 AM | #

LOL, on the other hand .....

I’d sell out my genes for a piece of that. Especially if she dressed like this and made me pancakes:

Posted by fellist on October 16, 2009, 08:38 AM | #

Whoopi Goldberg was interviewed recently for BBC News, the interviewer was another African lady and one of the themes they discussed was the way Goldberg’s looks do not conform to (european) stereotypes of beauty and so her career would suffer relative to a Black actress like ( I forget her name—played Catwoman…). Can she really believe it’s just culture that makes people think she’s uglier than (the Catwoman actress)?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 16, 2009, 09:06 AM | #

To “Pos45ition”:  1) no Ethiopian beauty is even in the same league as white beauties (let’s not restrict ourselves to the mannish preferences of the homos who run Haute Couture); 2) yes other races have their own beauty but they can’t have white beauty.  Only we have that, just as only they have theirs.  And since they all want what we have it infuriates them when anyone says they can never achieve it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 16, 2009, 09:08 AM | #

And this photo says, in a roundabout way, they can never achieve it.  So they’re furious at this photo.

Posted by pos46ition on October 16, 2009, 10:36 AM | #

let’s not restrict ourselves to the mannish preferences of the homos who run Haute Couture

Well, those are the two examples in the post. Naturally I’d take a normal white beauty over any other kind. But here, the Ethiope is superior.

But at least with the Ethiopid type there is closer proximity to the common Europid type, if one doesn’t reject afrogenesis, that is. And that’s all an African origin means—the “cline” running from the Ethiopid to the low Semitic, the Semitic, true Caucasoid and Aryan types. This shouldn’t offend as it says nothing about us, except that we’re closer to the Ur-Ethiopid than to the Yellow or Aboriginal races of the East, or a certain high Nordic type. Most of us are Middle Europeans, and there’s nothing wrong with that—except for over century the Middle European has tricked himself into overestimation of the Nordic.

I don’t see anything deep in the photo itself. It says to me that some Jews and Italian homos think bony Nordic women are the most beautiful creatures on earth, and think they’re being edgy by putting one in blackface. In fact, I think the popularity of Ethiopian beauties is more in line with what you’re saying, because the Ethiopian is really closer, racially, to the common European; by emphasizing the Ethiopian, the Europeans are pushing the subtle message that race is merely “skin color”, because the Ethiopian beauty approaches white bone structure and form—much as in high fashion, the bony Nordic alien meets up with the bony sub-Saharan alien to push the same message.

Posted by pos46ition on October 16, 2009, 10:37 AM | #

“But at least ... ” was in response to,

yes other races have their own beauty but they can’t have white beauty.

Posted by pos46ition on October 16, 2009, 10:46 AM | #

I forget her name—played Catwoman…

Halle Berry, who owes her looks to marginal whiteness. Goldberg owes her popularity to the beatnik Jewry of Hell’s Kitchen.

The Europeans have an advantage in racial propaganda. American propagandists are forced to push the African-American type, which is generally beastly, as is known. Europeans, unabashed slaves to aesthetic hierarchy in advertising, can utilize recent Ethiopid imports, stimulating the appetites of disaffected European males who before long even make the leap to cruder African types across the big water. I’ll never forget meeting a group of eager blue-eyed young Swiss in the Caribbean—there, explicitly, to shag as many bush bunnies as they could.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 16, 2009, 11:11 AM | #

Right now I don’t have time for anything longer, am rushing to get somewhere, but my reaction to Position’s mentally retarded posts is Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…..................................

You’re a mental retard, Position.  Thanks, and have a nice day!

Posted by Felim on October 16, 2009, 01:04 PM | #

Ugh!  Why on earth are TROLLS like Anon or Position permitted to post on here?  When I come to read this blog I don’t need to read anti-racist claptrap spewed by the the likes Anon or have people like Position covering the board with pictures of niggers and telling us about how he sexually fantasizes about niggers.  Okay?  Why the hell does GW allow all these trolls to post on here?  I understand recognising trolls isn’t one of GW’s strong points; case in point - ogenoct.  Just about everybody on the racialist blogsphere have recongised that he is nothing but a shit-stiring clown - everybody except GW!  Can’t these trolls be PLEASE bee EXCLUDED in the future?

Posted by Desmond Jones on October 16, 2009, 01:37 PM | #

Isn’t that why Il Duce invoked the anti-M, because those Ethiopian chics are hot?

Posted by Dan Dare on October 16, 2009, 02:46 PM | #

If darkies can be encouraged to indulge in a little harmless whitening up with Fair & Lovely, Hindustani Lever’s ‘revolutionary breakthrough in skin lightening technology’, what’s so awful about a girl going in for a little extreme tanning?

Just the thing for achieving that lovely ‘wheatish’ skin-tone that is so much in demand in the Times of India matrimonials column.

Posted by Z on October 16, 2009, 03:18 PM | #

The Hated White Race
by David Yeagley, “Bad Eagle”

[...]

“This all happened many years ago, but, I never forgot it. Today, I see truth in the words of my Middle Eastern neighbor. White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children. Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.

“This denigration of race is a cruel mockery of manhood. It is a pathetic testimony of the personal irresponsibility and malignant selfishness of failed men. Indeed, a careless woman is generally such for the lack of a caring father.

“But I will not dismiss this kind of race destruction as sexual caprice or mindless ego in aimless men. It is not some Über-design of social architects, or the express intent of integrationists. While racial disintegration may be the result, there are other inevitabilities at work in the process.

“Like the universal law of aesthetics. We want beauty. Superior beauty lies in the white race. It is the variety of color, the red hair, the blonde hair, the green eyes, the blue eyes. All the other races in the world have only one coloring, the same black hair, the dark brown eyes and skin. A bit drab in comparison, can’t we say?”

[...]

“The darkies of the world are truly fascinated with the white race, and always have been. However, there is a certain envy that naturally, unavoidably develops. It seems Hitler had a point when he referred to “the hated white race.” (Mein Kampf, p.325.) But the sexual encounter of the dark with the white makes the white dark. And what most people—especially white people—forget is the fact that the white race is the minority in the world. It is, and has always been, vastly out-numbered by the dark races. Moreover, the pigmentations of the white race are all genetically recessive. The whiteness is first to fade.

“Therefore, integration tends to mean elimination for the white race. That’s simply the way of the genetic world. That the white race became the most powerful, dominant, ruling race may be attributed to cultural values more than anything else. It was of course the white race that adopted the Judeo-Christian religion. The social constructs and psychological hierarchies in this tradition evolved a people more astute and agile in every way.”

“Whatever ‘mental’ problems the white race developed as a result of being more powerful are only fairly recent evolutions. In his day the white man has created a throne like no other in history. If it is criminal at the foundation, the challenge is chiefly from envy—always the weakest charge. Besides, what’s the point of the dark man accusing the white man of not keeping his white morals, if the dark man himself does not believe in those morals? The charge of hypocrisy is moot, made in impotence. (The white man’s self-flagellation is the only hope of the darkies.)”

[...]

http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/16/the-hated-white-race/

~

“...The white man’s self-flagellation is the only hope of the darkies…” INDEED!!!

*Keep exposing the trolls, guys.

Posted by Q on October 16, 2009, 07:21 PM | #

The dark brown skin makes that otherwise elegantly beautiful young woman look ugly. Not only that,  the color brown associates her with the repulsive smell of excrement.

Posted by Lurker on October 16, 2009, 09:39 PM | #

Is this the ghost of Silver come back to haunt MR?

Posted by GenoType on October 17, 2009, 01:08 AM | #

But, but, but….is she a nice person?

Posted by Frank on October 17, 2009, 04:15 AM | #

The woman in the first picture is gorgeous despite the black face.

pos46ition,

you might well be a light skinned negro. Ethiopians are beautiful as dogs can be beautiful. A white man isn’t tempted to hump them…

Posted by Frank on October 17, 2009, 04:18 AM | #

Q writes:

Not only that, the color brown associates her with the repulsive smell of excrement.

Ugh, so true. Nature’s racial boundary for even the most depraved, lol.

Posted by John on October 17, 2009, 07:27 AM | #

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091016/ap_on_re_us/us_interracial_rebuff

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 17, 2009, 11:55 AM | #

Yesterday I was going to come back when I had more time and put Position in his place at greater length, but Felim and I think it was Z did a good job of saying what the creep’s game and true nature were, and I don’t think his comments are something the self-respecting want or need to spend more time on, whether refuting, re-hashing, or re-reading, so I’m leaving it at that.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 17, 2009, 12:01 PM | #

Yes it was Z — and by the way, wasn’t that a GREAT excerpt from Prof. David Yeagley which Z posted?  Fantastic writing there by the Comanche Indian!  The Comanche race produced some great warriors and sheer survivors back in the day, and it produces them yet!

Posted by John on October 17, 2009, 12:08 PM | #

p.o.s.46ittion:

I’d sell out my genes for a piece of that. Especially if she dressed like this and made me pancakes:

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 17, 2009, 12:15 PM | #

There’s white trash, there’s also white filth.  Position is exactly the variety of white filth (assuming he’s white, a huge assumption I admit) as Birch Barlow and as the creep signing as “Joe” in this comments thread:

http://hbdbooks.com/2009/10/a-fertile-white-woman/ .

At bottom, the societal problem represented by the Birches, Joes, and Positions is the free-rider problem analysed by Professor Salter and others.

Posted by Wandrin on October 17, 2009, 02:20 PM | #

Oona King, Channel 4’s head of diversity and former Labour MP, said the programme shows conclusively “that you cannot link race to IQ”.

This is a good example of the genocidal multi-cult trying to head off or muddy true information before it hits the mainstream. However, they can’t win this because the Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, Indians, Russians etc are all involved in genetic research also and as they are not in the process of trying to exterminate their native population they have no incentive to lie about the truth. In the case of SE Asians the opposite is true as they have an incentive to brag while some Indians would use the sub-samples for caste related purposes. So they’ll lose this argument eventually.

I’d imagine as they begin to feel they can’t hold the line they’ll shift to admitting the link but saying IQ is just a cultural measure and shows nothing of any importance.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 17, 2009, 04:06 PM | #

Notice “Anon,” Oct. 16, 10:26 AM, never came back to defend his views.  As Trainspotter and others have noticed, the ‘tards “have nothing,” they have no argument to make, all they have are assertions that are logically on the order of two plus two equals five.

Posted by Armor on October 18, 2009, 07:24 AM | #

The idea of painting Ms. Stone in black was probably meant to stimulate the imagination of Vogue readers, who are white. Some of those pictures may evoke a parallel universe on another planet, or exotic tribes living in the wild, possibly in the prehistoric past, but it has nothing to do with Africans.

Similarly, an African who overhears the word “black” in a conversation between white people should not assume that the conversation is about him. Basically, black journalists like Hannah Pool should mind their own business, and preferably go back to Eritrea.

Hannah Pool’s bio at The Guardian: “In 1974 Hannah Pool was adopted from an orphanage in Eritrea and brought to England by her white adoptive father.”

Posted by James Bowery on October 19, 2009, 01:36 PM | #

Germany’s Next Top Model competition is the chick version of All Star Wrestling.  The only question is, why are the promoters of this particular kind of faux competition so insistent on this particular outcome?  I suppose we could start by asking, who are these promoters?

Posted by Robert Reis on October 20, 2009, 03:03 PM | #

http://theseoultimes.com/ST/?url=/ST/db/read.php?idx=7333

Ethiopians are not cannibals like the Chinese.

Posted by Robert Reis on October 21, 2009, 02:30 AM | #

pos46ition

Thanks for the photos. She is clearly more beautiful than the women the creeps who criticize her will ever date.

Posted by Orion Blue on October 22, 2009, 07:23 PM | #

Not so much not en vogue as merely repulsive. I wonder what the fetish for all this is really about?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 22, 2009, 07:35 PM | #

Robert Reis, the creeps, of which I am one, weren’t criticising “her,” but race-replacement being rammed down the Eurosphere’s throat.  That’s the spirit in which Position’s comment was criticised.  I’m sure she’s fine for Ethiopia or wherever in Araby you live.  She’s not fine for here, or at any rate not millions of her are.  Are you a race-replacement advocate now, Mr. Reis?  If not, please respect the spirit in which such criticisms are made.  If so, you’re posting at the wrong forum.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 22, 2009, 07:48 PM | #

A big problem with the bovine Euro brain is it can’t understand the difference between the number one and the number one trillion.  So if you say you question the desirability of importing one trillion women like this Ethiopian into your Euro homeland the bovine-brained Euros attack you for supposedly saying not even one single Ethiopian woman like this should be allowed to come.  You never said that but the Eurobovines can’t grasp the difference between one and one trillion.  When God was handing out the synapses for that, Euros were at the end of the line, he ran out of those particular synapses before he got to them.

Posted by Dasein on October 27, 2009, 01:33 PM | #

And while we’re discussing numbers, we should also say that Ms. Nuru is atypical for Ethipians.  If one were to choose a ‘Top Model’ from a random sample of 100 Europeans or 100 Ethiopians, I have little doubt as to who which group’s top choice would be the consensus #1.  Sorry, Robert, if this offends you, but Africans (whether Negroid, or Ethiopid, where it’s to a lesser degree) have primitive features.  And that photo of the merry miscegenator’s (position), where Nuru is wearing white gloves just looks bizarre.  She would look more ‘beautiful’ were she wearing traditional garb.  Ethiopians, Africans, Arabs do not become more beautiful or sophisticated by adopting European norms.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 27, 2009, 02:06 PM | #

“where Nuru is wearing white gloves just looks bizarre”  (—Dasein)

Not to mention the hair that had to be de-kinked using three tons of lye, to get it to imitate white hair and even with three tons of lye it’s an extremely poor imitation.

Posted by Dasein on November 06, 2009, 06:56 AM | #

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6-branded-racist.html

Not the surname one would expect for the headteacher of an ostensiby Christian school:

[IMG]http://i760.photobucket.com/albums/xx249/Aletheia14/article-1225633-0719C5B8000005DC-43.jpg[/IMG]

Mrs Gower, who also has a nine-year-old daughter, Jasmine, at the school, said she complained to the school’s head, Carolyn Cohen, who took the side of the older girls.

She added: ‘I told her Sharona is very upset and confused about this situation and didn’t fully understand why she was being reprimanded.’

Mrs Cohen last night denied that the incident had been logged on a computer database.

Posted by haha on July 06, 2010, 01:24 AM | #

white beauty does not exist. the only beauty is colored beauty. whites are not a natural people. they are inferior to all and their days are numbered on this earth. everyone comes from the black race. all features and the world can be found and traced back to Africa the motherland and breeder of of humankind. when i saw this picture i thought it was an Ethiopian woman. the comment that this is offensive i disagree with. artists try to make things beautiful and what i think this woman was doing was taking this woman and making her look (in her artistic mind) beautiful. and i do think this is beautiful, not some “exortic otherness.”

Posted by dworry on December 22, 2010, 08:15 AM | #

This moron said that A choice between 100 Europeans or 100 Ethiopians. oh my god a continent Vs a single country…. hahahaha. Billion people Vs 25 million Semitic people.        hahahahaha dummy ...
I am an Ethiopian, and if you really know the history you wouldn’t dare to open your mouth bastard ghost.
let me tell you that pale people(England, Germany or west Europe) are called ghosts in Ethiopia. No body wants to marry pale people who have 1000’s of dots of red and black in their skin, we rape you in Ethiopia not with our dick but with a dirty stick because you are undesirable. of coarse you have a head start for now but it only began in 1600 A.D. Why are you proud for such a short history of you being known to be existing.

Ethiopians only dream of Ethiopians, think of Ethiopians, marry Ethiopians and care about Ethiopians.
And when it come to fight we fuck Europeans———die with dignity.
the only country never colonized————- Ethiopia.

The fact that Germany’s populace chose Sara Nuru as a winner over a pale Nordic freaks is all because Ethiopian are very beautiful and a normal person whether white, black,yellow or barbarian can see it. I wonder why you blind barbarian folks didn’t. I guess you are not interested in the fact that true beauty is in Ethiopia,North Africa, Arabs, Basil and eastern Europe and south Asia.

Ethiopia Adopted Judeo-Christian beliefs before Rome if you are really in to truth…. you don’t believe me search and read it, but then truth hurts.

Herodotus(Ancient Greek) said Ethiopians have a complex and intriguing color and a very nice face structure and a weak body smell.  And not millions of acne spots in their skin.

Nordic barbarians like you dummy are always afraid that black, brown and yellow people if they get stronger are going to rape them in their own land…....... this time with a drill machine.
you know who the strongest is, you know who has more number and you know we are gradually getting smart a double pace compared to Europeans.

Wait Africa is the next china in 20 years.
the best soccer player——————- Pele
the best musician—————————- Michael Jackson
the best music genres———————Rap, hip hop, rock N roll, Jazz, R& B .....all black achievements
the best basket ball player—————MJ
the fastest runner————————- Hussein BOLT
the strongest man————————- Black man
the widest mineral concentration in world(75%)——————- AFRICA
the original humans————————- Africans
the biggest guilt holders———————pale people(so named white)
the Next big thing——————————————- Africa

Ethiopian Gangstas…. die with dignity.