Streaming From The Honeyed Isle

Posted by jamesUK on May 03, 2010, 09:34 PM | #

Eurasianism vs Imperium Europa.

That would be a good debate. I wonder what Lowells views on Dugin and the Eurasia movement is.

Posted by Søren Renner on May 03, 2010, 10:26 PM | #

I survived Bondi Plus!

Posted by Weaver on May 04, 2010, 12:59 AM | #

Can’t seem to get it to work. What’s Eurasianism?

How about we unite in our refusal to join the melting of nations?

Posted by Gorboduc on May 04, 2010, 08:31 AM | #

Weaver: read James H. Billington’s The Icon and the Axe.

Otherwise, only bother about it if you a Mongolian.Or if you like Ungern-Sternberg, the Bloody White Baron, and his bone amulets and murderous habits.

I struggled through Duguin’s Rusia: El Misterio de Eurasia: polar peoples, theories about the ecliptic, the Piri Reis maps, Nostradamus. all the usual mad stuff. Politically totally meaningless.
It would be just as mad in English.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 04, 2010, 09:57 AM | #

“How about we unite in our refusal to join the melting of nations?”  (—Weaver)

Yeah, how about we do that.

Weaver, that’s basically what this site’s been about since it began in October 2004.  You’re a little slow catching on.

Posted by jamesUK on May 04, 2010, 10:03 AM | #

@Weaver

I didn’t have a problem with the link when I clicked on it, it opened up in windows media player.

From what I understand Eurasianism was a concept developed under German Empress Catherine the Greats rule as I guess a counter block against the Enlightenment movement in France and essentially against US imperium dominating Russia and the Eurasian sphere and the Trotskyite liberal democratic model.

Against «Modern times»

http://evrazia.org/article/753

Soft tyranny of liberalism

http://evrazia.org/article/1194

Things like open immigration, minority rule, economy controlled by international oligarchy, gay rights, pornography, abortion, etc.

This is a good breakdown of western liberal democracy by author Linda Kimball in her book The New Soviet Union: America and the West

“Behind radical feminism, same-sex marriage, the androgyny theme, gay pride, and the overall pattern of degeneration at all levels of society throughout America and the West lies a revamped international Communist revolution. Being anti-Stalinist it shuns the Communist label and instead disguises itself as Multiculturalism and Political Correctness.”

    “Separation of church and state, pornography, easy divorce, open borders, extreme sex education, abortion, gay pride, same-sex marriage, androgyny, political correctness, speech codes, the wreckage of the traditional family, and hate crime laws – all were imported to the Christian West from the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union. We did not recognize it as Communism because we believed Stalin’s modified version to be the original communism”.

    [ . . . ]

    “Like falling dominoes, the collapsing family led to the fall of social order, culture, and then the economy, unleashing a tidal wave of crime, corruption, sexual debauchery, and chaos.
    When Stalin came to power, he took immediate steps to restore order.
    The family and ethics were restored, abortion and divorce made difficult to obtain, and sodomy, gender-bendering, etc. were re-criminalized.
    In taking these steps, Stalin destroyed the Bolshevik’s ‘revolution,’ for which they hate him to this day”.

http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=40193

Posted by jamesUK on May 04, 2010, 10:14 AM | #

@Fred Scrooby

“How about we unite in our refusal to join the melting of nations?” (—Weaver)

Yeah, how about we do that.

Weaver, that’s basically what this site’s been about since it began in October 2004.  You’re a little slow catching on.

Why should you care then what is going on South Africa.

Does that have any effect on US, Britain, etc.

Most of the large companies that dominate South Africa like De Beers diamond minning are owned by British interests so any change would effect British financial reserves in the country.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 04, 2010, 11:01 AM | #

Replying to JamesUK’s last comment:  I care about what’s going on in South Africa because I’m against Euro-race people getting wiped out, exterminated, by Negroes and their international Caucasian backers.  I’d much rather see those international Caucasian backers wiped out.

By the way, JamesUK, your comment before last was quite good, which is very unlike you (the one about “Linda Kimball’s new book”:  damn good quotes there!).  Normally you start and stop with 1950s style “geopolitics” as if this were still 1955 and Dean Acheson, John Foster Dulles, and Dwight Eisenhower were still running things over here and Krushchev over there.  Earth to JamesUK:  that world no longer exists.  It’s been eclipsed by something brand-new which Lind and van Creveld are too dense to identify with all their talk about “fourth generation warfare”:  race-replacement of your ethno-racial enemies.  You want fourth generation warfare?  You’re in it right now.  This is it:  race-replacement of the enemy.  That gets rid of him for good.  You have to admit, it’s effective.

Posted by jamesUK on May 04, 2010, 12:09 PM | #

@Fred Scrooby

By the way, JamesUK, your comment before last was quite good, which is very unlike you (the one about “Linda Kimball’s new book”:  damn good quotes there!).  Normally you start and stop with 1950s style “geopolitics” as if this were still 1955 and Dean Acheson, John Foster Dulles, and Dwight Eisenhower were still running things over here and Krushchev over there.  Earth to JamesUK:  that world no longer exists

Geo-politics goes further back than the 1950’s since the enlightenment in the 18th Centaury under British/Rothschild control and it is more prevalent today then during the 50’s in case you have not been observing what is happening in the world today.

There is not one mainstream political movement, separatist/terrorist movement, war today that does not have links to an external force as being the real motive behind it which includes the American civil war all of which have financial, monetary issue behind it. In fact was that not one of the main factors for the American Revolution high taxes on the colonies to finance the British Empire.

The pre-Stalinist Bolshevik Marxists came to the US on a wave of immigration dating backed from the failed western backed Bolshevik revolution of 1905. Hollywood itself was created by Pale of Settlement Marxist Jews. 

In Europe (apart from Eastern European states Poland, Ukraine, etc) and the US, Canada and Australia there is no such thing as blood and soil nationalism so it is no surprise that is were Communism originated and liberal ideas were able to take root without much protest or anyone realising it. 

You want fourth generation warfare?  You’re in it right now.  This is it:  race-replacement of the enemy.

That has always been the agenda but not against western countries (why they would eliminate there own base is beyond me but it does according to your logic) against Russia, Ukraine, Serbia and the third world populations to control there high birth rates. 

So how can they replace white race when they have made every effort and measure to reduce there population.

And using as they as always minority hostilities against Russia and China against the predominant ethnic Russian and Han Chinese population. 

NED hosted a conference on minorities under Chinese Communist rule and in Russia they are bring up Stalin WW2 era repression on minority Nazi collaborators when Germany invaded Russia and NED funded Memorial holds exhibitions on totalitarianism under Stalin’s rule.

Posted by Dasein on May 05, 2010, 05:25 AM | #

This Linda Kimball looks to be a typical neocon.  I don’t know if she’s jewish, nor if she’s related to Roger Kimball (editor of The New Criterion, a neocon publication), but she managed to write an essay on ‘cultural Marxism,’ mentioning many of the big names, without once referring to the ethnicity of these people.  She has also written an essay against Darwinism, another favorite topic for neocons.  The quote provided by JamesUK is ok, but notice that there is no mention of racial or ethnic destruction.  I’m willing to bet her book also doesn’t mention jews or race.  Am I right, JamesUK?

Posted by David on May 05, 2010, 10:47 AM | #

Nice video ... I even see Constantin was in it! (a picture of he and Norman) ... ha ha ha, awesome!  I think my Maltese is getting better—I’m up to about 10 words now

Posted by jamesUK on May 05, 2010, 11:37 AM | #

@Dasein

I don’t know personally have never heard of her before I saw the link posted on a website and thought it was pretty good description of pre-Stalinist Russia who after WW2 become anti-Stalinist Communist and the cult of “authoritarianism” which itself is Trotskyite propaganda first promoted by Marxist George Orwell. The same technique was applied to Nazism and fascist governments. 

http://www.idc-europe.org/showerInformation.asp?Identificateur=29

Anyone heard of this book Curzio Malaparte’s Technique of a coup d’état Published in 1931?

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/georgesorospostmodernvillian31aug04.shtml

She might be Jewish as most Neocons were anti-Communist during the 80’s and were pushing for aggressive actions against the USSR. 

If she wanted to get her book publish or even have a career in journalism/author I doubt she would talk about Communism as a Jewish movement. Unless she was Jewish herself.

Solzhenitsyn’s book “200 years together” still has not got an English translation and “Winter in Moscow” has not been re-published.