THE AFGHAN CHURCH

THE AFGHAN CHURCH

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

 

“When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
So-oldier of the Queen!”

—Rudyard Kipling, THE YOUNG BRITISH SOLDIER


The Church of St. John the Evangelist is popularly known as the Afghan Church. It is located in Colaba, in the southern most tip of Bombay. Its steeple rises 210 feet, and for more than 100 years it has served as a landmark for ships entering the harbor.

*inscription inside the Afghan Church*

“THIS CHURCH WAS BUILT IN MEMORY OF THE OFFICERS WHOSE NAMES ARE WRITTEN ABOVE, AND OF THE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICERS AND PRIVATE SOLDIERS, TOO MANY TO BE SO RECORDED, WHO FELL, MINDFUL OF THEIR DUTY, BY SICKNESS OR BY THE SWORD, IN THE CAMPAIGNS OF SIND AND AFGHANISTAN, A.D. 1838-1843.”


The Afghan Church is a mute testimony to the brave men who sacrificed their lives for the glory of the Empire. Built in the Gothic style, it was meant to be a garrison church to observe the memories of the British soldiers who lost their lives during the First Afghan War. It later also commemorated the fallen soldiers of the Second and Third Afghan Wars. The Afghan Church was the first monument of religious and spiritual significance that was built (in India) to commemorate a military event. It is one of the most important Anglo-Indian monuments.


*inscription inside the Afghan Church*

“TO THE GLORY OF GOD / AND IN MEMORY OF / PERCY CHARLES HEATH / CAPTAIN BOMBAY STAFF CORPS / THIRD SON OF THE LATE MAJOR GENERAL / J.C. HEATH BOMBAY ARMY / BORN 11TH APRIL 1847 / KILLED AT THE BATTLE OF MAIWAND / AFGHANISTAN JULY 27TH 1880 / THIS MEMORIAL IS PLACED HERE / BY HIS BROTHERS / IN LOVING REMEMBRANCE / “THE TRUMPET SHALL SOUND / AND THE DEAD / SHALL BE RAISED”


The Afghan Curch was consecrated on January 7, 1858. It was the first church in India to be built with basalt and brown limestone. In Bombay’s dazzling tropical sunlight, the solemn beauty of the church adds to its ethereal character. William Butterfield, Britain’s most famous 19th century ecclesiastical designer, was commissioned to design the choir stall, the tiled floor and the teakwood pews. Some of the pews have the unique feature of slots for use as gun-rests. The church was and is located inside a Naval Base (then British, now Indian).


*inscription inside the Afghan Church*

“IN LOVED MEMORY OF / MAJOR SIR / PIERRE LOUIS NAPOLEON / CAVAGNARI / K.C.B. C.S.I.B.S.C. / POLITICAL OFFICER WITH / THE BRITISH TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN / AND ENVOY TO THE COURT OF KABUL / HE FELL / WITH THE MEMBERS OF HIS ESCORT / WHILST GALLANTLY DEFENDING / THE RESIDENCY AT KABUL / AGAINST OVERWHELMING NUMBERS / 3RD SEPTEMBER 1879 / AGED 37.”


The multicolored stained glass windows and the ventilators high on the ceiling add splendor to the soldiers’ stories in stone.

Posted by Constantin von Hoffmeister on Tuesday, March 3, 2009 at 10:26 AM in
Comments (40) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Phalanx on March 03, 2009, 11:00 AM | #

I’m sorry but what is the point of this post? Can we please have some relevant posts.

2

Posted by Søren Renner on March 03, 2009, 11:09 AM | #

“Peccavi.”

3

Posted by Urban on March 03, 2009, 03:59 PM | #

Just one more thing that needs to be preserved. Thank you for the information. smile

4

Posted by Guessedworker on March 03, 2009, 04:26 PM | #

But I don’t want Sind now, Soren.  And if the price of taking apart every mosque, temple, gudwara and goddamn ashram in my ancestral homeland is the destruction of the memoral to these brave men, then so be it.  Let our reclamation of our land be their new memoral.  Let us remember them in the revivified and eternal body of our people.

5

Posted by Selous Scout on March 03, 2009, 04:58 PM | #

Even in a land of squalor, ignorance, and darkness, a Western thing of beauty still exists.  I guess that’s the point. And perhaps long after Britain, Europe, and the US have succumbed to civil war and mass bloodshed, the Afghan Church will still stand.

6

Posted by White Western Man on March 03, 2009, 06:57 PM | #

Seeing as both Christianity and Islam are offshoots of the disgusting non-religion of Judaism (which is actually a Jewish racialist cult, not an actual religion), they are both utterly corrupt and bereft of any real spirituality and meaning.

Christianity and Islam, because they are nothing more than the pitiful bastard children of Judaism, are not at all Western/European but are in fact Near Eastern (Jewish) in origin. They have only managed to graft themselves on to Western peoples and cultures because of excessive internal Jewish (thus Asiatic) influence on Western societies over the last 1,500 years; Christianity in particular has served to weaken White Western peoples over the last 1,000+ years and as such must be opposed at all costs - with its emphasis on meekness, passivity, and pacifism (i.e., weak feminine traits), and because of the wholesale discouragement of reproduction amongst the elite, highly educated clergy (which clearly had a dysgenic effect in Europe over the last few centuries) Christianity must be laid to rest before it causes further damage to White Western peoples. Some aspects of Christian philosophy and the fervent anti-Semitic activism of the historical Jesus is interesting and worthy of some study and reflection, but the whole Son O’ God thing is just ridiculous and overblown and is nothing more than your typical case of Jewish hyperbole and megalomania.

It’s well beyond time to toss the petty, jealous, and ultimately feminine Middle Eastern God on to the dung heap of history and re-embrace the more robust and masculine native beliefs and systems of European/Western religion(s) which were not imperialistically imposed upon billions in the past few centuries as Christianity has been.

This wrathful, jealous, materialistic, guilt-inducing, weak, and ultimately JEWISH Middle Eastern Sky God has played havoc with the collective White Western (non-Jewish) psyche of humanity for over 2,000 years - it’s time to start undoing the damage. 

White Western men and women - it’s beyond time to let go of this second-rate Jewish/Asiatic God-idea and start to rediscover the indigenous religions of your ancient White European ancestors before they were cruelly misled by the laughably stupid Middle Eastern Sky God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

7

Posted by SM on March 03, 2009, 07:34 PM | #

“Posted by White Western Man on March 03, 2009, 10:57 PM | #”

==

Yeah. It’s all part of the jew diaspora.

Christianity is jew “trouble maker” liberalism/ marxism ‘version 1.0’. Christianity and marxism is the “one two” punch of the diaspora: jab, jab, jab with the jesus cult and then—once we’re good and fatiqued—pow! with the modern liberalism right cross (or left cross since they’re jews, LOL); feminism (the worst thing that has ever happened) is the tweety bird squad circling our heads as our pockets are rifled through.

It is fascinating, though, the way it took hold in the minds of Rome and post Rome ejecta zones (us). Meaning it is not a purposeful thought through conspiracy; it is just the ‘blind watch maker’ of cladistic (group [migrant]) evolution selecting tween variant strategies.

“Advocacy Protectionist” utopian demagoguery (soapbox BS) works the best. Certainly better than the facts which don’t say anything people want to hear (when they can understand them occasionally).

Humans—specifically maybe Euros—are inherently vulnerable to such utopian political shepardizing strategies and the inevitable parasitism and hypocrisy (hypocrisy, because the utopia CAN NOT work, even if it is good intentioned and sincere).

So then what we’re left with is sword play at dawn over the instinctual “crypto ovulation” [etc] tricks of females and the group interest food territories. And that aint gonna work either: Man doesn’t like it—and importantly didn’t like it or we’d still be there (blind watch maker stuff again). [And note, I’m a starting lineup athlete, class leader ...um once… and I still say it aint gonna work.] So back to the spread-by-lies-and-delusion ‘advocacy’ protectionist utopia attempts we go.

A little bread of my body anyone?...

8

Posted by the Narrator... on March 04, 2009, 03:08 AM | #

Let our reclamation of our land be their new memoral.  Let us remember them in the revivified and eternal body of our people.

Posted by Guessedworker on March 03, 2009, 08:26 PM |

Amen!

9

Posted by Fr. John on March 04, 2009, 04:19 PM | #

“Seeing as both Christianity and Islam are offshoots of the disgusting non-religion of Judaism (which is actually a Jewish racialist cult, not an actual religion), they are both utterly corrupt and bereft of any real spirituality and meaning.”

Excuse me NON WHite Western Man. Your Christophobia is utterly at odds with what WHITE WESTERN MAN is all about.

Hilaire Belloc noted “Europe is the Church; the Church, Europe.”

You cannot be one if you are not the Other.

I, for one, don’t need your UTTER BULLSHIT on this forum, and I’m man enough (and Christian enough) to say so!

If it weren’t for the Christian Church, your mother would not have borne you, as they created the concept of Hospitals in the first place!

Unless you are a Jew yourself, and hiding behind a facade of ‘impartiality’ that is not.

Christianity, TRUE Christianity, is not an ‘offshoot’ of the Judaic cult. It is its’ SUPERCESSION.

What passes for Judaism today is nothing but Talmudism, the racial supremacist vision of a non-Semitic people, to boot!
[cf. “The Thirteenth Tribe”.

SO, when you insult the Faith of Europe, you insult European Man himself.
Away with you. Peddle your anti-white rhetoric on a forum for Jews and Pagans, and Sodomites. They, at least, would appreciate it.

I don’t.

10

Posted by Gudmund on March 04, 2009, 05:54 PM | #

Fr. John:

Hard to argue that Christianity is at least an offshoot of Judaism as they do share some religious ideas and holy books.  But to the extent that Christianity represents a syncretism of proto-European Classical religion and thought with later ideas from the Near East, I agree that it is sufficiently of Europe to be considered a dear part of our cultural heritage and accorded due respect. 

PS Christianity wasn’t even the first Near East influenced religion to become popular among Europeans.  It has happened before and is not the end of the world.

11

Posted by Jew System Wobbling Is Big Chance for WN on March 04, 2009, 11:17 PM | #

The Jewish system of macrocontrol is wobbling and eroding now more than perhaps any time since the 1930s, and White nationalists in many countries must begin earnestly organize around their cause and offer a viable alternative to the wobbling and decaying Jew system of macrocontrol and race-replacement while this critical window remains open.  A briefing from the Israeli government recently stated:

They noted that at the beginning of 2009, the State of Israel and the Jewish people are facing a range of complex and severe challenges and threats, and called attention to the change of administration in the US, geopolitical uncertainty, a continuing erosion in the US’s global position and the slide toward a multi-polar world, the strengthening of Iran, Israel as a pretext for the dissemination of a new anti-Semitism, the risk to Israel’s image as a refuge for the Jewish people against the background of growing calls for its destruction, the economic crisis and the severe blow to Jews’ economic status, the impairment of the ability to maintain community life and education systems against the background of growing competition vis-a-vis eroding philanthropy and the diversion of contributions to outside the community, and changes in the traditional family structure. - http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2009/Cabinet-commmunique-22-Feb-2009.htm

Note that on that page it also says, befitting the hostile and antagonistic attitude Jews take toward people of European descent wherever they may be: “Enhanced ties between Jewish communities and the Hispanic and Afro-American communities in the US”

12

Posted by White Western Man on March 05, 2009, 03:39 AM | #

Re: Fr. John

“Excuse me NON WHite Western Man. Your Christophobia is utterly at odds with what WHITE WESTERN MAN is all about.”

I am definitely White and Western; I’m an American of Scottish, Scotch-Irish, and English ancestry, with familial roots in going back over 200 years in the mid-Atlantic region of the USA; I also have a smattering of German and so I’m told a tiny bit of Cherokee ancestry too.  So yes I am definitely White and Western.

I am not a “Christophobe” because I think that Jesus (if he in fact actually existed: there is debate about that and reasons to be doubtful) was a brilliant and inspirational anti-Jewish activist, one of the best and most compelling ‘anti-Semites’ the world has ever known.  For that I like and commend him, but to think that he or any other person is/was the Son O’ God is the height of absurdity; anyone that makes such a claim is likely in need of mental health treatment - so Jesus was just another typical Jewish megalomaniac or crazy person (NOTE: there are LOTS of crazed Jews), though one with a healthy message: “Actively oppose Jewish control and hegemony.” 

And that’s what Christianity USED to be back when it meant something: an active and robust movement that actively opposed Jewish control and hegemony.  But it is not like this anymore, and as such it must be discarded along with other failed and outworn ideologies for something better - perhaps a resurrection of certain pre-Christian European religious ways, or the formation of new pro-White/Western/European religious movements.  However, politics is no substitute for religion/spirituality, and therein lies the problem - The West has become so infested and ruled over by Abrahamic [JEWISH] mythology for quite a while now that the process of shaking it off will be a painful process for White Western peoples, like the cutting out of a cancerous tumor.

“Hilaire Belloc noted “Europe is the Church; the Church, Europe.”

So what?  That’s only one man’s opinion; he is not the supreme authority on Western culture - he was a radical Jesus The Jew worshiping Catholic in the non-Catholic, mostly secular country of England.  I’ve read some of Belloc’s writings and have enjoyed some of what he had to say (he was critical of Jewry and endorsed a more equitable and sustainable economic system, for instance), but he or any other individual is in no way equipped to define what White-Western-European culture is.  That quote is actually very arrogant, short-sighted, and narrow - and thus I reject it.

Christianity has been on the decline in many White Western countries for well nigh 150 years (also remember that America has NEVER been nor was it founded as a “Christian nation”), and nowadays many churches in Europe have to struggle to even stay open to patrons…or they only remain open as museums.  Many parts of Europe and The West have thankfully moved on from the Jewish-invented fairy tale known as Christianity, and thus we White Westerners are looking for a decent replacement (as I said above, politics is obviously not a sufficient replacement for spirituality).  Thus, by replacement I don’t mean limp-wristed leftist politics (or weak center-right politics, either), materialism/Marxism, multiculturalism, feminism, plutocratic capitalism, hyperconsumerism, and other fraudulent Jew-inspired ideologies and movements - we people of White European descent need something STRONG and ROBUST; in short, something WHITE and WESTERN.

You cannot be one if you are not the Other.

Bullshit.  White-Western peoples and cultures existed and thrived for thousands of years before Christianity or even a vestige of the Abrahamic tradition ever existed. 

I, for one, don’t need your UTTER BULLSHIT on this forum, and I’m man enough (and Christian enough) to say so!

Is this YOUR forum?  Do you set the rules here?  You seem to be in to censorship - how Jewish of you!

If it weren’t for the Christian Church, your mother would not have borne you, as they created the concept of Hospitals in the first place!

Did the Christian Church invent procreation?  Babies happen without hospitals, ya genius.  How do you even know that I was born in a hospital?  Plenty of people aren’t or were not, as throughout history (until around 100 years ago) the majority of births happened in people’s homes.  And no, Christianity didn’t ‘invent hospitals,’ that’s absurd - medical clinics and traveling or town doctors have existed for a very long time.

“Unless you are a Jew yourself, and hiding behind a facade of ‘impartiality’ that is not.”

I’m not a Jew (see my first response above) - in fact, I’m heartily anti-Jewish and intend to stay that way while also trying to convince others (whether White or non) of the necessity of actively opposing Jewish control and hegemony for the sake of the long-term survival of The West and even the entire world, as now the unhinged Jewish state of Israel and the crazies running it has the capability to send nukes wherever it wants.

“Christianity, TRUE Christianity, is not an ‘offshoot’ of the Judaic cult. It is its’ SUPERCESSION.”

Christianity is clearly an offshoot of Judaism, which is Jewish/Asiatic and NON-WESTERN - it was founded by Jews and for Jews (Romans 1:16; 2:9-10).  The founder of Christianity, Jesus, was a Jew; the apostles were Jews; the earliest adopters and missionaries of Christianity were Jews (though many still thought very lowly of non-Jews, referring to them a number of times as “dogs” in the New Testament)...thus Christianity is a Jewish movement through and through. 

Christianity was founded in many respects as an anti-Jewish movement, that is many of it’s earliest leaders, followers, and spreaders were strongly anti-Jewish even though they were ethnic Jews, apparently because they realized the evils inherent within Jews and Judaism.  Christianity was intended for Jews first, and non-Jews only later - it was initially invented and propagated apparently in an attempt to expose and presumably correct the seemingly innate flaws of Jewry, a ‘self help’ program for Jewry if you will.

Most strikingly, it has morphed in to a movement actively opposed to Jewry to a movement enamored of Jewry and in some respects actively seeking to be under the thumb of them.  Thus many modern Christians are weak and pathetic wannabe Jews, or Judaizers.

What passes for Judaism today is nothing but Talmudism, the racial supremacist vision of a non-Semitic people, to boot! - cf. “The Thirteenth Tribe”.

I agree that the real, hardcore Judaism is an anti-Western racialist-supremacist Talmudic cult; I also agree that the Ashkenazim aren’t entirely Semitic, though they certainly are partially Semitic as evidenced by the appearance of the ‘purest’ Jews and their Semitic/Asiatic behavior patterns.

SO, when you insult the Faith of Europe, you insult European Man himself.

Nope.  If I was insulting anything, it was the largely impotent pro-Jewish Christianity of modern times.  Christianity is not the “Faith of Europe” - it was imperialistically imposed upon White European peoples over the past 1,500 years by Judaizing missionaries and armies of all types, with its power center in the highly non-White/multicultural (not to mention Jew-infested) city of Rome.  Some parts of Europe were not even fully Christianized until about 700-800 years ago, and even then many culturally non-Christian vestiges remain there if they haven’t yet been entirely stamped out by the pitiful and moralizing Christians/Judaizers by now.

Christianity has interrupted the natural spiritual evolution of White Western peoples and as such it must be largely done away with, though some of the more positive (non-Jewish) aspects of it can be retained and appreciated.  Like I said in my previous post, I admire some aspects of the Christian doctrine and Christian philosophy, especially the radical anti-Jewishness of Jesus.

Away with you. Peddle your anti-white rhetoric on a forum for Jews and Pagans, and Sodomites. They, at least, would appreciate it.  I don’t.

More calls for censorship and/or the stifling free discussion?  Again I say…how Jewish of you, so typical of you modern fanatics and indoctrinated Judaizers, sorry, I mean ‘Christians’.

Like other fanatics who are personally invested in the Middle Eastern JEWISH fairy tales of yore, you take my criticism of JUDAEO-Christianity too personally.  You shouldn’t - just grow up, you aren’t a naive and wide-eyed 7 years old any more…fairly tales aren’t real - no Middle Eastern JEWISH Sky God exists requiring you to follow the writings of a violent and sickening group of writings composed by JEWS;  there is and never was a JEWISH Son O’ God on Earth and believing in him will not give you everlasting life; there were no miraculously JEWISH ‘water in to wine’ moments, nor bread and fish appearing out of thin air to feed a bunch of JEWISH people.  You have been duped by the JEWISH mythmakers along with the textual manipulators - free your mind from the JEWISH vice of Abrahamic throught, begin to re-embrace native White European thought, and one day you too can be free of these ridiculous Middle Eastern JEWISH myths and stories.

13

Posted by Jew Telling the Truth? on March 05, 2009, 05:59 AM | #

Quotes from the above linked article - http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/real_case.html - written by the Jewish journalist M. E. Ravage in a very rare flurry of Jewish honesty, does sum up the imperialistically Jewish nature of Christianity and the negative effects this has had on White Western peoples pretty well:

You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, he crucified Jesus but because he gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!

Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl.

You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?

A clumsy Russian forges a set of papers and publishes them in a book called “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book: All right. For the sake of argument we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that beside the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we have never denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels?

We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.

Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, carefree, pagan race. You worshipped countless gods and goddesses, the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. You took unblushing pride in the glory of your naked bodies. You carved images of your gods and of the tantalizing human figure. You delighted in the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. War and slavery were fixed institutions in your systems. Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of a social conscience or by any sentimental questionings about human equality. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.

But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.

We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the earth, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents at large of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to the unexplored ends of the earth.

Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk-tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer-books. Our national history has become an indispensable part of the learning of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricably woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.

Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.

Only after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans did the new creed come into prominence. Then a patriotic Jew named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of humbling the Roman power by destroying the morale of its soldiery with the doctrines of love and non-resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians. He became the Apostle to the Gentiles, he who hitherto had been one of the most active persecutors of the band. And so well did Paul do his work that within four centuries the great empire which had subjugated Palestine along with half of the world, was a heap of ruins. And the law which went forth from Zion became the official religion of Rome.

This was the beginning of our dominance in your world. But it was only a beginning. From this time forth your history is little more than a struggle for mastery between your own old pagan spirit and our Jewish spirit. Half your wars, great and little, are religious wars, fought over the interpretation of one thing or another in our teachings. You no sooner broke free from your primitive religious simplicity and attempted the practice of the pagan Roman learning than Luther armed with our gospels arose to down you and re-enthrone our heritage. Take the three principal revolutions in modern times—the French, the American and the Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?

Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot swallow or digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you ever-lastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full.

In full, of course, you never have accepted our Christian teachings. In your hearts you still are pagans. You still love war and graven images and strife. You still take pride in the glory of the nude human figure. Your social conscience, in spite of all democracy and all your social revolutions, is still a pitifully imperfect thing. We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires. In the midst of battle you are obliged to kneel down to him who commanded you to turn the other cheek, who said “Resist not evil” and “Blessed are the peace-makers.” ... And as you are about to yield to temptation, your Jewish training puts a deterrent hand on your shoulder and dashes the brimming cup from your lips. You Christians have never become Christianized. To that extent we have failed with you. But we have forever spoiled the fun of paganism for you.

14

Posted by Jew Telling the Truth? on March 05, 2009, 06:01 AM | #

Continuing on - http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/commissary.html -

We are conscious of the injury we did you when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. Suppose, we say tremblingly, you should wake up to the fact that your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems, are fundamentally of our making! And then you specify, and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion-picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The goi, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes.

Why throw up to us a patent and clumsy forgery such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion when you might as well confront us with the Revelation of St. John? Why talk about Marx and Trotski when you have Jesus of Nazareth and Paul of Tarsus to confound us with?

But even these plots and revolutions are as nothing compared with the great conspiracy which we engineered at the beginning of this era and which was destined to make the creed of a Jewish sect the religion of the Western world. ... But the upheaval which brought Christianity into Europe was—or at least may easily be shown to have been—planned and executed by Jews as an act of revenge against a great Gentile state. And when you talk about Jewish conspiracies I cannot for the world understand why you do not mention the destruction of Rome and the whole civilization of antiquity concentrated under her banners, at the hands of Jewish Christianity.

It is unbelievable, but you Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why. Your historians, with one great exception, do not tell you. The documents in the case, which are part of your Bible, you chant over but do not read. We have done our work too thoroughly; you believe our propaganda too implicitly. The coming of Christianity is to you not an ordinary historical event growing out of other events of the time; it is the fulfilment of a divine Jewish prophecy—with suitable amendments of your own. It did not, as you see it, destroy a great Gentile civilization and a great Gentile empire with which Jewry was at war; it did not plunge mankind into barbarism and darkness for a thousand years; it came to bring salvation to the Gentile world!

Yet here, if ever, was a great subversive movement, hatched in Palestine, spread by Jewish agitators, financed by Jewish money, taught in Jewish pamphlets and broadsides, at a time when Jewry and Rome were in a death-struggle, and ending in the collapse of the great Gentile empire. You do not even see it, though an intelligent child, unbefuddled by theological magic, could tell you what it is all about after a hasty reading of the simple record. And then you go on prattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?

And, mind you, no less an authority than Gibbon long ago tried to enlighten you. It is now a century and a half since “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” let the cat out of the bag. Gibbon, not being a parson dabbling in history, did not try to account for the end of a great era by inventing fatuous nonsense about the vice and degradation of Rome, about the decay of morals and faith in an empire which was at that very time in the midst of its most glorious creative period. How could he? He was living in the Augustan Age in London which—in spite of nearly two thousand years since the coming of Christian salvation—was as good a replica of Augustan Rome in the matter of refined lewdness as the foggy islanders could make it. No, Gibbon was a race-conscious Gentile and an admirer of the culture of the pagan West, as well as a historian with brains and eyes. Therefore he had no difficulty laying his finger on the malady that had rotted and wasted away the noble edifice of antique civilization. He put Christianity down—the law which went forth from Zion and the word of God from Jerusalem—as the central cause of the decline and fall of Rome and all she represented.

So far so good. But Gibbon did not go far enough. He was born and died, you see, a century before the invention of scientific anti-Semitism. He left wholly out of account the element of deliberation. He saw an alien creed sweeping out of the East and overwhelming the fair lands of the West. It never occurred to him that it was precisely to this destructive end that the whole scheme of salvation was dedicated.

Pacifism, non-resistance, resignation, love, were dangerous teachings at home [in ancient Israel]. Spread among the [Roman] enemy’s legions, they might break down their discipline and thus yet bring victory to Jerusalem. Saul, in a word, was probably the first man to see the possibilities of conducting war by propaganda.

He journeyed on to Damascus, and there to the amazement alike of his friends and of those he had gone to suppress, he announced his conversion to the faith and applied for admission to the brotherhood. On his return to Jerusalem he laid his new strategy before the startled Elders of Zion. After much debate and searching of souls, it was adopted. More resistance was offered by the leaders of the Ebionim of the capital. They were mistrustful of his motives, and they feared that his proposal to strip the faith of its ancient Jewish observances and practices so as to make it acceptable to Gentiles would fill the fraternity with alien half-converts, and dilute its strength. But in the end he won them over, too. And so Saul, the fiercest persecutor of Jesus’ followers, became Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles. And so, incidentally, began the spread into the pagan lands of the West, an entirely new Oriental religion.

The historians of the time leave us in no doubt as to the aims of Rome. They tell us that Nero sent Vespasian and his son Titus with definite and explicit orders to annihilate Palestine and Christianity together. To the Romans, Christianity meant nothing more than Judaism militant, anyhow, an interpretation which does not seem far from the facts. As to Nero’s wish, he had at least half of it realized for him. Palestine was so thoroughly annihilated that it has remained a political ruin to this day. But Christianity was not so easily destroyed.

By the year 200 the efforts of Paul and John and their successors had made such headway among all classes of Roman society that Christianity had become the dominant cult throughout the empire. Meantime, as Paul had shrewdly foreseen, Roman morale and discipline had quite broken down, so that more and more the imperial legions, once the terror of the world and the backbone of Western culture, went down to defeat before barbarian invaders. In the year 326 the emperor Constantine, hoping to check the insidious malady, submitted to conversion and proclaimed Christianity the official religion. It was too late. After him the emperor Julian tried to resort once more to suppression. But neither resistance nor concession were of any use. The Roman body politic had become thoroughly wormeaten with Palestinian propaganda. Paul had triumphed.

15

Posted by Colin Laney on March 05, 2009, 07:59 AM | #

And if the price of taking apart every mosque, temple, gudwara and goddamn ashram in my ancestral homeland is the destruction of the memoral to these brave men, then so be it. 

Goodness gracious, David. I do hope no ‘gangsterism’ will be involved in those peaceful and democratic actions you are proposing.


Let our reclamation of our land be their new memoral.  Let us remember them in the revivified and eternal body of our people.

I note with some satisfaction that as you get your blood up, the Salterisms fall out of your speech. Do you imagine there’s a causal relation there? And if so, do you think it could work in both directions, i.e. by avoiding Salterisms you might get some other people’s blood up, get some other people interested in the ‘eternal body of our people’?

You must have taken your monkey glands this morning.

The Afghan Curch was consecrated on January 7, 1858. It was the first church in India to be built with basalt and brown limestone. In Bombay’s dazzling tropical sunlight, the solemn beauty of the church adds to its ethereal character. William Butterfield, Britain’s most famous 19th century ecclesiastical designer, was commissioned to design the choir stall, the tiled floor and the teakwood pews. Some of the pews have the unique feature of slots for use as gun-rests. The church was and is located inside a Naval Base (then British, now Indian).

From Ezra Pound’s July 26, 1942 radio broadcast, “Axis Propaganda”:

What does a Belisha or a Sassoon care for Canterbury? Nothing. It is not his Canterbury, it is NOT his cathedral. The destroyed monuments are not monuments to the glory of Judah. They show NOTHING that the Jew can be proud of. IF medieval, they were built in open defiance of the Jew slime, and of the Talmud. They are an offense in the eye of the Jew; they are what his oily race has NOT accomplished. Insofar as there are monuments to OTHER races he is against them. And from the moment they are classified as national monuments he cannot TRAFFIC in them, and they are therefore useless to him until they are reduced to fragments that can be sold in antique shops.

Regarding the comment, “if Medieval, they were built in open defiance of the Jew slime, and of the Talmud”, Pound here is speaking of the Neoplatonically derived inspiration for the Gothic cathedral, beginning with Abbot Suger’s use of the Pseudo-Dionysius as a template for Saint-Denis:

Neoplatonism entered medieval architecture through the Gothic style originated by Abbot Suger of Saint-Denis (Rorem 1993). Suger was a Neoplatonist (Crosby 1987, Crosby et al. 1981) and the architecture style he developed was encyclopedic, hierarchical, symbolic, and cosmic in dimension. All of the great Gothic cathedrals were built on this Neoplatonic aesthetic. Experience of their interiors was a spiritual and uplifting experience. Attending rituals in such a structure harkened back to the cosmic theurgy of Proclus. The cathedral transformed liturgy into an aesthetic mystical experience.

It may be true that “Europe is the Faith, and the Faith Europe”, but I have seen no good evidence at all that the faith under discussion is Christian, or that the god worshipped by this Faith is YHVH. Indeed, all of the evidence points in a far more unexpected direction.

The Reformation opened the floodgates to the worship of a genuinely Jewish god, one who is by his own accounts, quite hostile to non-Jews, and (again) by his own admission, bent on their destruction.  I realize that Christians here will say that they are ‘heirs according to the promise’, but to whom has mastery of the world been given?

Face it: you’ve been had.

16

Posted by Ezra Pound, WN on March 05, 2009, 09:07 AM | #

Re: Colin Laney

From Ezra Pound’s July 26, 1942 radio broadcast, “Axis Propaganda”: “What does a Belisha or a Sassoon care for Canterbury? Nothing. It is not his Canterbury, it is NOT his cathedral. The destroyed monuments are not monuments to the glory of Judah. They show NOTHING that the Jew can be proud of. IF medieval, they were built in open defiance of the Jew slime, and of the Talmud. They are an offense in the eye of the Jew; they are what his oily race has NOT accomplished. Insofar as there are monuments to OTHER races he is against them. And from the moment they are classified as national monuments he cannot TRAFFIC in them, and they are therefore useless to him until they are reduced to fragments that can be sold in antique shops.”

Great quote Colin.  Thanks for that.

For those interested in reading more of Ezra Pound’s brilliantly telling WWII radio broadcasts, check out the following link - http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/7897401/pound_ezra/radioPound.html - I especially recommend #16 (March 15, 1942) U.K.(B16) entitled “ENGLAND” for a good exposition on how Jews rotted the British Empire.  Notice too how similar that situation eerily parallels America’s current crumbling empire and its Jew/usurious troubles.  Ah hell, the speech is so good that I’ll just go ahead and post it here; have at it:

The enemy is Das Leihkapital.  Your Enemy is Das Leihkapital, international, wandering Loan Capital.  Your enemy is not Germany, your enemy is money on loan.  And it would be better for you to be infected with typhus, and dysentery, and Bright’s disease, than to be infected with this blindness which prevents you from understanding HOW you are under mined, how you are ruined.

The big Jew is so bound up with this Leihkapital that no one is able to unscramble that omelet.  It would be better for you to retire to Darbyshire and defy New Jerusalem, better for you to retire to Gloucester and find one spot that is England than to go on fighting for Jewry and ignoring the process.

It is an outrage that any clean lad from the country—I suppose there are STILL a few ENGLISH lads from the country—it is an outrage that any nice young man from the suburbs should be expected to die for Victor Sassoon, it is an outrage that any drunken footman’s byblow should be asked to die for Sassoon.

As to your Empire, it was not all of it won by clean fighting.  But however you got it, you did for a time more or less justify keeping it, on the ground that you exported good government or better government than the natives would have had without England.

You let in the Jew and the Jew rotted your empire, and you yourselves out-Jewed the Jew.  Your allies in your victimized holdings are the bunyah, you stand for NOTHING but usury.

And above metal usury; you have built up bank usury, 60% against 30 and 40%, and by that you WILL NOT be saved.  Corrupting the whole earth, you have lost yourselves to yourselves.

And the big Jew has rotted EVERY nation he has wormed into.  A mill stone.  Well, an exceptionally good swimmer MIGHT conceivably be cast into the sea with a stone tied round his neck.  He might perhaps untie it.  If he were a Scotchman, he would remember his jackknife, before being thrown overboard.

You seem to remember NOTHING.  It were better you were infected with typhus.  As to federal union, or JEW/nion.  There is NO question of race in Streit’s proposition.  It is as proposed a union of slaves, under Jewry.  Offered by liars and abettors of thieves.

You have stolen land from your late Allies, and land slips from your control.  The ONLY conquests of Britain and Rosenfeld are conquests FROM their alleged allies.

All right, say that Franklin Delany swipes ALL South America—to what end ?  And ruin the United States of America while he is doing it.  What’s that to you ?  It is not England’s salvation.  Will you ever LOOK at the story of empire ?  You are NOT even in the mercantile system, you are in a fake mercantile system, not even mercantile.  It was for a time called mercantile or the mercantilist system and defined as considering the happiness of a nation to consist in the amount of MONEY it owned, and its process to consist in STEALING, welching, pouching the greatest possible amount of same (i.e., of money) from other nations.

That defines the USURY system, the ONLY system Anglo Saxons have known or used in our time.

And it will not save you.  NOR will Judaized Russia.  Nor will the Kahal, the Jew’s central committee of bleeders.  WI-IAT is their system ?  Unvarying, cheap goods, sweated out of cheap labor, dung dust hurled on the world, the WORLD conceived as sweat shop, to hell with the 8-hour day, down with abundance.  DUMPING sweated goods, dumped against any and every nation that pays a just price for labor.  That is your ALLY.

And in your past a trail of blood and of infamy.  You bought Hessians to kill your own blood in America.  You bought ’em from a stinking feudal overlord, who was in the hands of the ROTHSCHILD; that is HISTORY.  You stirred up the American savages against your own kin IN America.  But now Eden and Cripps have called in the Muscovite, to burn and destroy all Eastern Europe, and kill Finland, for the sake of the stinking Jews nickel mines.

Your infamy is bound up with Judaea.  You can not touch a sore or a shame in your empire but you find a Mond, a Sassoon, or a Goldsmid.  YOU HAVE NO RACE left in your government.

God knows if it can be found still scattered in England.

IT must be found scattered in England.  The white remnants of England, the white remnant of the races of England must be FOUND and find means to cohere; otherwise, you might as well lie down in your grave yards.

You have for years had cheap goods DUMPED in from Russia.  Your alliance with Moscow will bring no relief to that wound.  Your Jews have ruined your home manufactures.  Loans from the city of London, loans to the Orient, interest paid in cheap cotton goods, loans to the South American countries, interest paid in beef from the Argentine, and ruin of English grazing.  The laws of durable government have been known from the days of King Wen.  When empires go to ROT, they go to rot for known reasons.

The Times, Telegraph, Manchester Guardian, are there to conceal these reasons.  Your press is an infamy, has been throughout our time.

The laws of durable government have been known from the days of King Wen, and when the Roman Empire perished it perished from the same follies that your kikes, your Rothschilds, Beits, Sieffs, Schiffs, and Goldsmids have squirted into your veins.

Cheap grain dumped from Egypt, ruin of the Italian farming, usury, and more usury, THAT is the answer.

For two centuries, ever since the brute Cromwell brought ’em back into England, the kikes have sucked out your vitals.  A mild penetration, for a hundred years they have bootlicked your nobility and now where is your nobility ?  You had at least the semblance of control; you had, let us say, some influence with the Lords of Judaea as long as they WANTED your titles, as long as Levy Levinstein Lawson WANTED to be addressed as Lord Burnham.  You could turn the worst edge of their avarice, or rather you could turn it OFF, the upper or huppar clawses; and turn it ONTO the peer.  As you did without mercy.

But when the same scroungers have moved over to New York City, how will you manage ’em ?  The same bloody minded extortioners, or their descendents.  The same FINANCIAL HOUSES.  The same Rothschilds who plotted with Sherman, and Vandergould to KILL the American nation, who betrayed the United States in the “sixties”.  Head office in London, agents in the U.S. of America.

Now the address is altered.  Main office in Wall Street and Cohen in London.  You send Willie over to spy on us.  You send 5000 usurers’ pimps over to Washington and give special passports, diplomatic, to inveigle the United States into your plans to get cannon fodder from Idaho and from Iowa to weld your slaves cellar on Europe.  And this time you get dumped into the ash can.

You have even forgotten your Kipling.  Pig Baldwin has forgotten his cousin; if his obscene and treacherous mind ever grasped the meaning of Rudyard’s stories.  Let me recall one passage to the sow face:

“The Americans,” wrote Rudyard, “obligingly slaughtered each other in order that the Czechoslovaks might inherit Boston Common.” Cras tibi, tomorrow is your turn.  Damn it all, you slaughtered the flower of England in the Boer War.  Then in 1914 in the first three months, the best of you went out and got slaughtered.

[TEXT MISSING IN ORIGINAL] been seen only too clearly.  And your foul papers, the filth of your news print has been subsidized to keep your minds off it.

A dirty bit of meat by the name of Gollancz has used your book trade to conceal it.  You have almost NO means of communication.

When a Brooks Adams writes five volumes that would help you to see it, six copies reach England.  You have LOST the health of the mind.  God knows how the scattered handful of Englishmen still in England can still speak one with another.

I see NO remedy in your parliament.  I don’t mean as parliament.  I mean in the personnel.  It is your problem.  You do not NOW even elect your own parliament.  Whether WITH an election you could get anything save old dead meat, I do not know.  During the last war a few men had a glimmer of instinct.  On whatever formula, they called it pacifism.  Was it ?  All of ’em I ever met were pugnacious.  Was it an instinct to save the butt end of the RACE by not fighting ?  Is it a mistake to combat Germans by force ?

Is there a RACE left in England ?  Has it ANY will left to survive ?  You can carry slaughter to Ireland.  Will that save you ?  I doubt it.  Nothing can save you, save a purge.  Nothing can save you, save an affirmation that you are English.

Whore Belisha is NOT.  Isaccs is not.  No Sassoon is an Englishman, racially.  No Rothschild is English, no Strakosch is English, no Roosevelt is English, no Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Baruch, Schiff, Sieff, or Solomon was ever yet born Anglo-Saxon.

And it is for this filth that you fight.  It is for this filth that you have murdered your empire, and it is this filth that elects your politicians.

You have lost your tradition.  You have not even learned what Lord Byron told you.  You are, as even that foul rag the Times tells you, a little late in making a start.

In the year 1942 Anno Domini, there is only one start you can make.  And that is a start toward being England.  A refusal to be a province of Israel, or an outpost of Yankee-Judaea.

Quando tutti saremo forti.

Pound’s WWII broadcasts can also be had in book form - http://www.amazon.com/Ezra-Pound-Speaking-Speeches-Contributions/dp/0313200572 - though I’m very surprised the Jews who run the American publishing industry haven’t banned and/or forced the book to go out-of-print yet.

17

Posted by Colin Laney on March 05, 2009, 09:29 AM | #

You have not even learned what Lord Byron told you.

Since it’s easy to miss this reference, I often provide the relevant passages from Byron’s “Age of Bronze” whenever I trot out Old Ez’  March 15, 1942 broadcast, “England”:

XV.

Or turn to sail between those shifting rocks,

The new Symplegades—the crushing Stocks,

Where Midas might again his wish behold

In real paper or imagined gold.

That magic palace of Alcina shows

More wealth than Britain ever had to lose,

Were all her atoms of unleaven’d ore,

And all her pebbles from Pactolus’ shore.

There Fortune plays, while Rumour holds the stake,

And the world trembles to bid brokers break.

How rich is Britain !  not indeed in mines,

Or peace or plenty, corn or oil or wines;

No land of Canan, full of milk and honey,

Nor ( save in paper shekels ) ready money:

But let us not to own the truth refuse,

Was ever Christian land so rich in Jews?

Those parted with their teeth to good King John,

And now, ye kings !  they kindly draw your own;

All states, all things, all sovereigns they control,’

And waft a loan “from Indus to the pole.”

The banker, broker, baron, brethen, speed

To aid these bankrupt tyrants in their need.

Nor these alone; Columbian feels no less

Fresh speculations follow each success;

And philanthropic Israel deigns to drain

Her mild per-centage from exhausted Spain.

Not without Abraham’s seed can Russia march;

‘Tis gold, not steel, that rears the conqueror’s arch.

Two Jews, a chosen people, can command

In every realm their scripture-promised land:—-

Two Jews, keep down the Romans, and uphold

The accursed Hun, more brutal than of old:

Two Jews—- but not Samaritans—- direct

The world, with all the spirit of their sect.

What is the happiness of earth to them?

A congress forms their “New Jerusalem,”

Where baronies and orders both invite—-

Oh, holy Abraham !  dost thou see the sight?

Thy followers mingling with these royal swine,

Who spit not “on their Jewish gaberdine,”

But honour them as portion of the show—-

( Where now, oh Pope !  is thy forsaken toe?

Could it not favor Judah with some kicks?

Or has it ceased to “kick against the pricks?” )

Oh Shylock’s shore behold them stand afresh,

To cut from nations’ hearts their “pound of flesh.”

18

Posted by Ezra Pound, WN on March 05, 2009, 10:02 AM | #

Thanks for that reference Colin.  Who knew that Byron was aware of Britain’s Jewish problem?  I had no idea!

Ezra Pound’s writings and even his speeches are so full of allusions (many of them rather obscure) that they can sometimes be difficult to follow for even the most erudite - but again, thanks for filling in one of the gaps.

Yes, as Byron writes and Pound says it’s clear that there is some kind of strange alliance between England and Jews, ‘Anglo-Jewry’ if you will - many have often spoken or written of the Anglo-Jewish alliance, especially in recent times by LaRouche and some others.  It’s also clear that the British ‘royalty’ and overall Anglo ‘aristocracy’ is riddled with Jewish blood, having managed to worm their way in to it with money or by heavily indebting the non-Jewish elite; from the link: “England has become a “mongrel” nation, ruled “largely by a galaxy of Jews, half-Jews, and quarter-Jews.” Quotes Belloc’s theory that as of the early 20th century most of the British aristocracy was at least partly Jewish, and although the names of these families were still English their “physique and character had become wholly Jewish.” (If you go to LaRouche’s 1978 essay “That Zoo Called the ‘House of Lords’”, you’ll see what he was really alluding to when he complained about the alleged biological and moral degeneracy of the aristocracy.)”

I’ve often wrote and thought about how Jews do all that they can to slowly but surely infiltrate the elite/aristocracy and other various ruling classes of societies in order to help disarm or inoculate that country against the possibility of an anti-Jewish movement from popping up there and in order to easily control the wealth of that group or nation.

19

Posted by Jebus: Lard and Unsavory on March 05, 2009, 01:50 PM | #

In fairness to Fr. John, he believes whites are Gawd’s Choosen People.  He is also in favor of another Crusade to reconquer the Hole-ly Land - a worthwhile endeavor.

20

Posted by Guessedworker on March 05, 2009, 06:46 PM | #

Colin Laney: do you think it could work in both directions, i.e. by avoiding Salterisms you might get some other people’s blood up, get some other people interested in the ‘eternal body of our people’?

Well, you know how it goes.  Wintermute and Neuromancer.  Intelligent syncretics.

The eternal body, btw, isn’t wondrous and starry in its longings.  It’s to be found here:-

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/to_do_what_we_must_to_remain_who_we_are/

Sorry to disappoint.  But that said, you may be surprised to see where Salterism is headed next at MR.

21

Posted by danielj on March 05, 2009, 07:32 PM | #

Pound’s WWII broadcasts can also be had in book form - http://www.amazon.com/Ezra-Pound-Speaking-Speeches-Contributions/dp/0313200572 - though I’m very surprised the Jews who run the American publishing industry haven’t banned and/or forced the book to go out-of-print yet.

I own it.

There is a lengthy foreword explaining that although Pound had some quirky ideas about Jews and money he was still a poet par excellence and we must examine him in all his gory detail to truly appreciate his Cantos. It is an apology, but nothing like Socrates’.

22

Posted by danielj on March 05, 2009, 07:36 PM | #

The Reformation opened the floodgates to the worship of a genuinely Jewish god, one who is by his own accounts, quite hostile to non-Jews, and (again) by his own admission, bent on their destruction.  I realize that Christians here will say that they are ‘heirs according to the promise’, but to whom has mastery of the world been given?

Face it: you’ve been had.

He is not a Jew who is one outwardly.

It is simple and you complicate and obfuscate and multiply unnecessarily. Anyone who is an heir, is an heir according to the Promise and God can raise up children of Abraham from stones. It doesn’t have anything to do with genetic ancestry. The mastery of the world has been given to Christ and through Him to the elect.

Nobody has been had.

23

Posted by SM on March 05, 2009, 09:10 PM | #

Anyone who is an heir, is an heir according to the Promise and God can raise up children of Abraham from stones. It doesn’t have anything to do with genetic ancestry. The mastery of the world has been given to Christ and through Him to the elect.

——————
Heirs of ‘god’...

A society of exfacto slave dolts (with all the aptitude and character shortcomings of such a class). ...Infantiles who lost power to the chicanery—and worse—of their females. (Indeed these slaves are so doiltish that they praise as a shining example the distopia they foolshisly created; like pee wee herman wiping out on his bike and then going “I meant to do that”.)

Civilization in general—but Euro civilizations specifically and noteably the [early] christsendom period—is the institutionalizing of dysgenic revolt [bio-sexual, because everything is] against the better males from childhood (for humans this means smarter, more talented).

I see nothing in christendom that doesn’t flesh that out perfectly. I see christendom as the next wave in that ever rising tide.

Yes it is ironic that man appears to get smarter as society ‘modernizes’. This is simply nurture specialization created by the endless social sexual (psychological) complexification that the endless coup’d eta called civilization creates.

The Greeks tried to grapple with man and dysgenics and civilization and failed.

I am not a slave, by birth, who needs protection from the fart in the sky. An omnipotent fart which if it exists at all is the _main cause of the things I need protection from_: I have no desire to be part of a coaliton/group that can’t contemplate that.

My “god module” ist kaput. (Modules = chemicals in the brain/body that have been selected—eg like the orgasm module.) Whether this `kaputing is my nature or my horrible nurture is irrelevant. (A nature and nurture created by god and his slave dolts.)

———————
“Golly gee, I need a tax break and more jesus [ultimately anti-darwinist /daft] in me schools. Then I can stop those ugly ‘feminazis’ and “liberals” and their pesky government.” (...Even though what ‘liberals’ advocate my religion does too—being as this liberalism and feminism is simply the demand for codifiying what my [christian /civilized] ‘cultire’ already has taught as ideal goal for millenia…)

Then you wonder why you can’t win.

We have met the enemy… and we is them.

—-
Y’all may now ignore this post too.

24

Posted by danielj on March 05, 2009, 10:00 PM | #

I am not a slave, by birth, who needs protection from the fart in the sky. An omnipotent fart which if it exists at all is the _main cause of the things I need protection from_: I have no desire to be part of a coaliton/group that can’t contemplate that.

Hey how about fuck you? I can contemplate it but I find you and your ilk unable to do so and lacking a coherent argument and having no understanding of epistemology you lash out at your allies because you are insecure. You know nothing and your mother probably told you it is better to remain silent in such a circumstance didn’t she? Thanks for keeping it real though! I’m glad we can debate things in a civilized fashion here instead of acting like the retards at VNN.

25

Posted by Templar on March 06, 2009, 05:28 PM | #

Frankly, one might as well argue that whites are inimical to white interests, and should be written off, as argue the Catholic Church/Christianity is inimical to white interests, and should be written off.

The logic, that of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, is essentially the same.

26

Posted by trish on June 27, 2009, 06:45 PM | #

Ah, so this is where all the sick people are! Without exception, you all need serious help dealing with your anti-semetic phobias! What’s the matter with you? Are you afraid the jewish religion is the true religion and you all have been wrong all your lives?! Doesn’t matter what trash somebody responds with, deep down you all know this is true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shameful people!

27

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 27, 2009, 07:11 PM | #

“your anti-semetic phobias!”  (—Trish)

People don’t like their culture destroyed and their race genocided by the Jews, Trish, what can I say?  People are funny that way, I know, I know, it’s ridiculous but that’s human nature for ya, wot are ya gonna do, ya can’t change it.  Hey maybe the Jews’ll have them all genocided and turned into Negroes before they can react or do anything silly — there’s always that hope.  Problem solved, no more sick anti-Semitic phobias!

28

Posted by trish on June 27, 2009, 08:49 PM | #

“maybe the Jews’ll have them all genocided and turned into Negroes ” Sorry, you don’t make sense, (it’s actually an ignorant response, but I expected it) I happen to be of white european descent myself, but I won’t add craven to that list! This site is nothing but an outlet for human waste, why do you hate so much? I’m outta here. You people are sad. sad. sad.

29

Posted by Captainchaos on June 27, 2009, 09:02 PM | #

I’m outta here. You people are sad. sad. sad.

LOL!  You mindless twit.  What do you really have but to cluck your thick tongue?  If present trends are taken to their logical conclusion our people will cease to exist, yes genetically.  That is GENEocide.  Did I stutter, dumbfuck?  Hope not!  Crude and simple is the only language drones like you seem to be capable of understanding.

30

Posted by Q on June 27, 2009, 09:09 PM | #

We are sad. sad. sad. Because there are idiot whites like you in the world fighting against your own races’ survival.

31

Posted by trish on June 27, 2009, 09:40 PM | #

Crude and simple is the only language drones like you seem to be capable of understanding.

Because there are idiot whites like you

LOL myself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thankyou for proving my point!

32

Posted by Q on June 27, 2009, 09:55 PM | #

LOL myself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thankyou for proving my point!

Ha! I didn’t know Geno Type had daughter.

33

Posted by Q on June 27, 2009, 10:00 PM | #

has a daughter - chip off the ole’ shmuck

34

Posted by trish on June 27, 2009, 10:23 PM | #

HO HUM ......  Lame.
Adios! (oops,no mexicans here!)

35

Posted by Q on June 27, 2009, 10:50 PM | #

trish, did you know the letters of you name when rearranged spell shit-r? That explains why I smelt something really fowl when you appeared here.

36

Posted by trish on June 27, 2009, 11:00 PM | #

Dear Q-less;

  Your comments are typical, (or should I say, childish?),no longer worth answering.
No intelligent life here, I’m off!

37

Posted by Q on June 27, 2009, 11:17 PM | #

No intelligent life here, I’m off!

No No No, trish! Don’t go. Enlighten us with some of your (15 year old) adult wisdom!

38

Posted by R on June 28, 2009, 03:34 PM | #

To Q or is it Q-less?

About this site
This website discusses various issues related to the preservation of Western culture and the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of people of European ancestry.  This site does not argue that the EGI and cultural concerns of non-European people are less important than those of people of European ancestry.

Most materials within this site are presented in the format of a blog and the general public is allowed to comment on blog entries.  We welcome opposing viewpoints, but in order to have a scholarly discussion, we request commentators to avoid the use of profanity and ad hominem attacks.

The reader will find a variety of viewpoints discussed within this site, which sometimes lead to a heated debate, even among the bloggers.

Since the site admins respect freedom of speech, it is inevitable that some readers, including the admins themselves, will find some comments or entries offensive.  However, it should be kept in mind that all entries and comments within this site reflect the viewpoints of their respective authors and cannot be assumed to be held by others commenting or posting on this site.  On the other hand, comments inciting others to criminal activity will be deleted and repeat offenders will be banned from posting.  The site admins neither endorse nor condone criminal behavior for any purpose.

Sorry son, but I have to agree with the person who called you childish and typical. You seem to be easily provoked.

39

Posted by Q on June 28, 2009, 03:58 PM | #

You seem to be easily provoked.

Screw you and the GT you rode in on.

40

Posted by R on July 05, 2009, 08:05 PM | #

Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)
October 26, 2008


Will the financial crisis encourage anti-Semitism?
By Kenneth Stern
NEW YORK (JTA)—During times of crisis Jews get nervous, and for good reason. How many generations have learned the meaning of the word “scapegoat” the hard way?

Amid the current global financial meltdown, some have pointed out Jewish names in the news or hyped classical anti-Semitic tropes of “Jewish bankers.” How serious is the threat, and what should we be doing?

Some of the anti-Semitic charges first appeared on white supremacist and other hate Web sites. These are small in number, a few thousand from well over 100 million sites. They blame “Zionist criminals” for most things that go wrong in the world, so should we be surprised they update their offensive material?

Anti-Semitic messages have increased on some Internet discussion groups, and this is disturbing. The good news, however, is that Internet companies such as Google and Yahoo have adopted terms of service to counter hate postings and are removing much of the material once they are alerted to it.

No American politician or media personality has blamed Jews for the financial crisis. Obviously, to do so would be absurd. Many actors from every imaginable background had their hands in this meltdown. But while hard-core anti-Semitism has little correlation with rationality, we should derive comfort from past episodes when Jews have been alarmed during troubling times in which Jews were implicated. Attitudinal surveys regularly showed the concerns, while understandable, proved unwarranted. Jews were not blamed for the 1973 Arab oil embargo, for example.

On the international stage, however, the ground is more fertile for serving up Jews as scapegoats. Fresh in our minds is last month’s U.N. General Assembly speech by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who delivered a classic anti-Semitic diatribe accusing “Zionists” of “dominating an important portion of the financial and monetary centers.”
That this outrageous address came just a couple of weeks before the meltdown on Wall Street and in other global markets means it might resonate with some Arab and Muslim audiences. Not surprisingly, as the financial crisis deepened, Hamas took up the mantle, asserting that Jews are to blame.

There is the potential for anti-Semitism to grow during difficult times. This is all the more possible in the age of the Internet, a medium in which slanders and rumors are easily circulated and too easily believed. Indeed, a conspiratorial storyline already has appeared.

On Oct. 3, a Web site associated with the Holocaust-denying group The Barnes Review posted an article with a fake byline titled “The Voice of the White House.” Displayed next to another article from the Bloomberg news service, which described how Lehman Brothers lost $400 billion before it went bankrupt, the fake article asserted that the $400 billion was sent “frantically” to Israel and that “the senders are all Jewish.”

Other sites picked up the item as real, and as the London Jewish Chronicle reported, the allegation appeared in the comment section of the Independent newspaper’s Web site for eight hours before it was removed. It likely will reappear or circulate via e-mails for some time.
The story wasn’t as quick to emerge as the charge that Jews were told not to go to work on 9/11, which still is widely believed in many parts of the Arab and Muslim world. But it has the same element of alleging the uncovering of a “secret truth.”

Elsewhere in Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe has emerged as a key venue to combat anti-Semitism. The OSCE special representative for anti-Semitism, Gert Weisskirchen, has been raising the concern about increased anti-Semitism related to the financial crisis, and the need for European leaders and institutions to be prepared to speak out.

No one knows whether the Lehman Brothers falsehood will have traction or become another on the long list of canards with a short and inconsequential life span. The “bright line” test will be how mainstream institutions around the world react in the days and weeks ahead: Will they condemn, ignore or endorse such hatred?

What they do, or don’t do, will be key.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: The Accusation of Racism

Previous entry: Strange bedfellows - Protests against the Durban II conference

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

pierdzimaka commented in entry 'Political lies, lived lies, all that is not real' on 05/24/12, 03:25 PM. (go) (view)

Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:20 PM. (go) (view)

grecian commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:10 PM. (go) (view)

hnjoewdh commented in entry 'Seeking Chinese Nationalist For Majority Radio Guest Spot' on 05/24/12, 02:39 PM. (go) (view)

Scewoweks commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/24/12, 02:24 PM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:04 PM. (go) (view)

Salvatore Quinto commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/24/12, 12:47 PM. (go) (view)

Trofigiogelry commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/24/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view)

DiefleleziG commented in entry 'Tiger Tiger' on 05/24/12, 12:18 PM. (go) (view)

Martha Barreda commented in entry 'Sunic interviews Fraser' on 05/24/12, 12:12 PM. (go) (view)

Classic Sparkle commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 12:07 PM. (go) (view)

Adalberto Deavers commented in entry 'The compassion of the court' on 05/24/12, 12:00 PM. (go) (view)

Optigmata commented in entry 'More thread wars' on 05/24/12, 11:08 AM. (go) (view)

payday loans commented in entry 'ANTI-JEWISM: The Deadly Plague of White Nationalist Slave Morality' on 05/24/12, 10:27 AM. (go) (view)

Verlene Zumwalt commented in entry 'Ireland Worshipping at the Holocaust Shrine' on 05/24/12, 10:16 AM. (go) (view)

Cobus commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 05/24/12, 10:14 AM. (go) (view)

pay day loans commented in entry 'Heidegger: The West Texas Translation' on 05/24/12, 09:59 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 09:49 AM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 08:54 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:41 AM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:18 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:53 AM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:48 AM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:32 AM. (go) (view)

Guest commented in entry 'The Torment of the Mulattoes' on 05/24/12, 06:17 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view)

Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view)

Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa