The Immigration bill and racial diversity in public schools hit in one day.

Posted by O'Riley on June 28, 2007, 06:37 PM | #

So they threw out the baby with the bath water.  It gives the illusion that the citizenry actually has some degree of control over that despicable cadre of lawyers, who may now appear to be responsive to the desires of the majority while at the same time bowing to their real masters and allowing the invasion to proceed uninhibited.  How clever.

O’Riley

Posted by Red Baron on June 28, 2007, 07:27 PM | #

Had this decision been made in the 1970s things might be very different in America at this hour.

There has been so much damage done in America I really doubt the downward spiral into total savagery can be stopped… even though racial gerrymandering of school districts is apparently over.

Posted by Count Sudoku on June 28, 2007, 10:13 PM | #

Someone else posited that a total moratorium on immigration would be the worst thing that could happen as there is already enough non-whites in the country, sort of the frog in the slowly warming pot analogy.

As for the first comment, he could be right as the above indicates.

Posted by Voice on June 28, 2007, 10:51 PM | #

You guys are right..It is too late. Under 18 is non-white and it is just a matter of time

Posted by Scimitar on June 29, 2007, 02:33 AM | #

A lovely day, wasn’t it?

Posted by Scimitar on June 29, 2007, 06:54 AM | #

According to Sean Hannity, the illegals are planning a 2006-style march, which might turn violent this time.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1857891/posts

Posted by wjg on June 29, 2007, 09:37 AM | #

For those that say this was a hollow victory I agree.  Until the White Man reasserts himself as a collective force and as a race we have gained virtually nothing other than a little time.  At some point in the near future, if we are to survive as a force in the world traitorous scum like Lindsay Graham, John McCain, and Trent Lott must learn to fear us.  Fearing either physical, emotional, or economic harm greater than that imposed by their current masters.  Some of them must be used as examples so that the other turncoats will suddenly have an epiphany of the value of racial loyalty. 

For those that say it is too late I disagree - (maybe for the USA as a country but its demise would be a blessing for all of Eurory).  As long as the constriction of defeat creates fewer but stronger White Men then this process is a necessary vetting.  We were/are weak from generations of material decadence.  Returning to the real world of life and death could only come from without.  If we become a minority for a time so be it; it seems to be what we need.  Creating the stronger White Man is what any WN movement must do.

Posted by Voice on June 29, 2007, 11:32 AM | #

Fred

I was misunderstood.  I meant we are not going to save “America”.  It is gone and won’t be retrieved because of the demographic and , racial, transformation. 

I define “America” as the unapologetic culture of honoring our forefathers as the creators of Western Civilization and it science, arts and literature(this is already long dead as we all know they are white devils and oppressors)

We are not dead as white Americans and can live on but this won’t come without White racial consciousness throughout the white population who have will to secede and/or take violent action against the state.

Paul Craig Roberts MAY have put it best, “How long before white americans are asking for Asylum back into Europe”

Most MR posters would say, I don’t want either.

Posted by Guessedworker on June 29, 2007, 11:37 AM | #

From this side of the pond it looks very like a victory, albeit it in one quite limited battle in a long, total war.  It must be remembered that the forces of reaction cannot be widely mobilised - that has perhaps been the greatest of several strategic advantages enjoyed by the race-replacers.  But this time it wasn’t enough, and within the terms of the debate that they themselves set (ie, within the institution of federal government) they have been defeated.

The vote split by individual senators is reported here.

Whether it means anything in the wider context remains to be seen.  The voices of the administration, of business and of the sainted minorities will chorus again.  But the Senate has proven for now that it is capable not only of respecting law and hearing popular opinion but of heeding them both.

Posted by James Bowery on June 29, 2007, 12:10 PM | #

GW, the time constants on the feedback loops are so long that it is simply ineffective as a control system.

Imagine a steering wheel on a 747 that has a time delay of generations before the air surfaces respond.

That’s the quality of immigration policies under government control.

It’s an obscenity that such systems exist in authority over humans.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 29, 2007, 01:03 PM | #

I like this:

Today’s Letter:  A NORTH CAROLINA READER TAKES THE PLEDGE

From: Mike Barnes [e-mail address in original, at link]

Re:  recent “Today’s Letter”:  A Tennessee Reader Wants A New Question Added To Immigration Polls

I read the question posed by the Tennessee reader and offer additional advice.

Let’s pledge to vote for the opponent of any elected official voting for any form of legislation, resolution, or proclamation offering illegal aliens:

1.  Sanctuary,
 
2.  Any form of taxpayer funded benefits including contributions to organizations offering benefits to illegal aliens,
 
3.  Anchor baby citizenship,
 
4.  Police no ask policy,
 
5.  Church or non-profit sanctuary protection without fully removing tax exemptions for the church or non-profit,
 
6.  Day worker centers,
 
7.  Legal services,
 
8.  Chain migration at the expense of the needs of the United States,
 
9.  Amnesty, earned citizenship, parole, or other politically correct name for amnesty.

If the official’s opponent also voted for similar legislation or resolutions, then I will vote for a write-in candidate.

I also will not make a contribution to any such official’s campaign and I will return campaign material, marked “Refused:  Return to sender.”

Barnes is a former IBM executive and worked in a similar capacity for an electric utility.  He also served as an elected city councilman for six years in a small New Jersey town.  Recently, Barnes changed his political affiliation from Republican to Independent.

Look at #5 in that list.  It’s high time our side challenged the tax-exempt status of Christian religions aggressively promoting race-replacement.  The worst offenders among Christians, I believe, are the Catholics and the Lutherans.  Imagine the look on the faces of some of these race-replacing U.S. Catholic Bishops when handed the tax bill on Church income, property, and real-estate and/or the legal fees they’ve run up in attempting to hold onto their tax exemption.  The power to tax is the power to destroy, right?  Right.  OK, let’s start putting that power to some good use:  giving the ones trying to destroy a little taste of their own medicine.  See how they like it.  Catholics and Lutherans still not listening to the voices of those who don’t want to get race-replaced?  Maybe this will unplug their ears and teach them to stick their noses out of stuff they know strictly nothing about.

NO MORE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS FOR CATHOLICS OR LUTHERANS AGGRESSIVELY PROMOTING AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS, OR A POLICY OF RACE-REPLACEMENT IN ANY OF ITS FORMS!

Posted by wjg on June 29, 2007, 01:12 PM | #

Voice,

I agree with your clarification.  It is too late for the entity still calling itself the USA.  Not only can it not be saved, it shouldn’t be.  It is a monstrosity.  The bulk of Euros who who should love their blood still love the USA even though she has turned from a beautiful maiden into a hag.  Many more of them need to realize this soon.  We need them.

Posted by wjg on June 29, 2007, 01:32 PM | #

“The power to tax is the power to destroy, right?  Right.  OK, let’s start putting that power to some good use:  giving the ones trying to destroy a little taste of their own medicine.  See how they like it.”

Well said Fred.  These scum think they are doing God’s will when it just so happens that “God’s” will in the realm of politics is always consistent with Judah’s.  Must just be coincidence that “God” thinks the same things about Euros as Alan Dershowitz and Abe Foxman.

It’d be funny to ally with the likes of Abe and Al to take away the privileged position of the judeo-xtians.  They clearly have too much time on their hands and money for them to have the “ministries” they do.

Posted by Scimitar on June 29, 2007, 02:07 PM | #

I do have some reservations. The problem is immigration, not illegal immigration. By defeating the Bush amnesty, the illegals will remain illegal, and the red herring of “illegal immigration” will stay alive and continue to dominate the immigration debate in the United States. Also, I worry that conservatives — encouraged by this victory — will stick with the GOP and hold out hope that they can “throw out the RINOs” in 2008.

Posted by a Finn on June 29, 2007, 06:02 PM | #

I cautiously congratulate European-Americans. Our opposition to these policies must become a permanent phenomenon.

Posted by Red Baron on June 29, 2007, 08:26 PM | #

> Paul Craig Roberts MAY have put it best, “How long before white americans are asking for Asylum back into Europe”

I’d leave America if given the chance, and there are places I’ve considered in Europe - though the UK is most certainly not one of them.

To be honest, I could even live in 3rd world country as long as it was peaceful and had a interesting culture, in contrast to the USA which is violent and cultureless.

What I see each day here makes me puke.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 30, 2007, 02:30 AM | #

Look at the press releases:

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called the U.S. Senate’s vote to block action on the immigration reform bill, “an enormous setback for a nation of immigrants.”

Oh?  Well ... there is no lack of voices saying the refusal of Israel to recognize a Palestinian right of return is an enormous setback for that other nation of immigrants, Israel — and come to think of it, maybe those voices are right.  Why, just think of the rich demographic and multicultural diversity Israel would gain by a policy of open borders for Palestinians and all other Third Worlders!  How about it, Abe Foxman?  When is the ADL going to advocate open borders and “Immigration Reform” for Israel, that well-known nation of immigrants?

The American Jewish Committee is disheartened by the Senate’s failure to agree on comprehensive immigration reform legislation.

Yeah but I bet not so “disheartened” by the Knesset’s failure to agree on “comprehensive immigration-reform legislation” for Israel ...

Again, can anyone believe the nerve of some of these Jews?  They spout this pro-race-replacement stuff for the U.S. while fully supporting Israel’s race-and-culture-preservation laws that are the equal of the Nazi Nuremberg laws of the 1930s.

(Hat tip, again, to Occidental Dissent.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 30, 2007, 02:49 AM | #

Look at this jaw-dropper in the American Jewish Committee’s statement:

We cannot afford to surrender in the face of these stubborn facts:  Illegal immigration will continue, the ranks of the vulnerable, undocumented underclass will continue to grow, and hostile local ordinances will continue to target immigrants and undermine community policing efforts.  We urge Congress not to throw up its hands but to continue working and to enact reform which serves America’s security, humanitarian, and economic interests and promotes family reunification.

Oh really?  The Jews urge that of Congress?  OK, maybe it’s time for Americans to urge Congress to cancel yearly aid payments to Israel until Israel opens its borders to the Moslem world and in fact the entire Third World and until Israeli demographers verify that Israel is on track to become a majority non-Jewish state by 2030 and its demographic change is so far advanced that that fate is no longer avoidable.  Let’s urge Congress to withhold aid payments until Israeli demographics experts can reliably tell us that.  The Jews aren’t the only ones who can urge nation-destruction on Congress.  Two can play that game.  Let’s urge some Levantine nation-destruction on Congress — let’s urge the destruction of a little nation of immigrants on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, a nation dear to the hearts of Abe Foxman, all the big donors to the ADL, and the men who run the American Jewish Committee.  See how they like a new U.S. government policy called Turnabout is fair play.  If they’re pipe smokers they can even put that in their pipes and smoke it ...

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 30, 2007, 02:57 AM | #

Excuse me, that last excerpt was from the ADL’s statement.  Small difference:  the ADL and the AJC both want the death of the United States and the race-replacement of its founding Euro populations.  I guess “The Realist” over at the Inverted World isn’t have much luck converting the Jews ... Been kinda slow-going has it, “Realist”? ...

Posted by Matra on June 30, 2007, 11:59 AM | #

Of the 13 Jewish members of the Senate 11 voted for amnesty. Norm Coleman of Minnesota (via Brooklyn) was expected to vote Yes for amnesty but apparently changed his mind either because he saw it was going to lose or he saw that he was going to lose his re-election bid next year as anti-amnesty websites prominently featured his office phone number. He was specifically targeted by opponents of the bill. Independent socialist Bernie Sanders also voted No. The rest of the Jews voted for the bill despite it being likely that their constituents opposed it.

Posted by Matra on June 30, 2007, 12:04 PM | #

Actually I think Coleman is up for re-election this year.

On the Supreme Court ruling Judge Breyer, a Jew, spoke with real emotion (according to the news reports) about the decision. His voice was breaking and he took a shot at Roberts and Alito. Needless to say Ginsburg also dissented from the majority. I wonder how Bush’s first choice Harriet Miers would’ve voted.

Posted by Scimitar on June 30, 2007, 03:58 PM | #

Lest I be accused of “singling out the Jews”:

Bishops Decry Failure of Immigration Reform

Posted by wjg on July 02, 2007, 08:42 AM | #

Fred says:

“It does take a certain kind of brain capacity which, apparently, not everyone possesses.  You’d think it would be a simple matter but apparently it’s an involved and complex mental process (I mean no exaggeration or sarcasm here, but am completely serious), and not everyone’s up to the task.”

I agree with you once the person is exposed to the idea (which you are saying Fjordman has been).  For years I was in a fog regarding racialism and White pride.  It was dormant in me but nothing brought it out because nothing in my life tapped it.  Unless a potential racialist has some small crack form in the judeo-liberal cocoon which encloses and suffocates life they may go to their grave never having broken free.  Many of these folk do have the capacity you refer to: the capacity to live as free men if they are only reached with the idea.

But like you say a White man with intelligence who once exposed to the truth decides to stay in the darkness is lacking in some other capacity besides brains, be it courage or integrity.  That is the sign of a man who is dead even before his heart stops pulsing.

Posted by wjg on July 02, 2007, 10:16 AM | #

It is fair to say the US has been the means by which multiculturalism has metastized throughout the West.  But it must be acknowledged that the US has been rotted from within by this same pathogen before it became the carrier.  Whether this disease is Jewry using the pretext of a liberalism they helped to both create and corrupt or liberalism that weakened us to the predations of Jewry (and others maladies) is an unresolved question.

Bottom line is that yes the US is now the number one explicit enemy to the West while being at the same time the supposed epitome of the West.  The US is a very strong and not too bright water boy.  Distinguishing the esoteric from the exoteric is crucial to real political analysis.  Fjordman digs beneath the surface but he seems to have stopped a layer too soon.

Posted by Wunderhund on July 04, 2007, 07:49 PM | #

Here is a map that illustrates the past, present and future projected white % of toal US population:

http://www.usapopulationmap.com/race_1800.html

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 05, 2007, 08:54 AM | #

I agree with the following, by the way:

Today’s Letter:  A NEW YORK READER DOES THE ILLEGAL ALIEN MATH AND REACHES A SHOCKING CONCLUSION

From: David Brehmer [e-mail link in the original]

The U.S. is underestimating the true number of illegal aliens.

A little over one year ago, the media and the federal government used the figure of 8 million aliens living in the U. S.  Then about 4-6 months ago the MSM and the government began citing 12 million as the probable number of illegal aliens. 

However, I disagree with that figure as well for the following reason.

Use the 1986 amnesty as a baseline. The (quietly held) statistical estimate by the federal government that between 3 - 4 million people per year cross into the U.S. illegally. And the hard statistic from the Border Patrol is that they interdict or catch between 750,000 to one million of these.  This gives us a very simple mathematical equation that results in a mind-boggling conclusion.

Based on the above information, over the 20-year period since 1986, the yearly estimated number of illegals that successfully enter the U.S. is between 2 - 3 million aliens. Multiply that by the 20 years and you arrive at a figure of roughly 40-60 million people illegally in the U.S. 

In spite of the data, only a very few reports hint that the number of illegals may be as high as 20 million. The MSM and the federal government are more comfortable with the widely used and lower figure 8-12 million aliens.

For obvious reasons, you’ll never hear the truth from them.

Until proven otherwise I will believe there are forty million or more illegal aliens in the U.S. (probably way more), most of them Mexicans and other Hispanics.  (This figure of eight to twelve million the MSM constantly trots out is rubbish, obviously.)  Bush has done his best to ensure, of course, that that number, forty million, will only continue to grow and the proportion of Euros continue to shrink.  For reasons no one has ever understood he wants a totally Hispanic United States. 

Bush is one of the worst criminals in the history of civilization.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 05, 2007, 09:01 AM | #

This twenty-million figure first published at Vdare.com was later confirmed in an authoritative study by I forget which big Wall-Street investment firm.  Certainly the absolute minimum number is in the mid-twenty-millions.  The figure one constantly sees of “twelve million” is purest government race-replacement propaganda.

Posted by tim on July 11, 2007, 08:52 PM | #

The US should allow more immigrants from Russia and other white majority countries. That’s a great way to increase white population. Right now, however, immigration from Russia is riddled with hurdles.

Posted by Matra on July 13, 2007, 04:37 PM | #

The US should allow more immigrants from Russia and other white majority countries. That’s a great way to increase white population.

A diverse white population within a polity will create more conflicts between whites. An exception would be those whites who no longer have countries of their own such as Rhodesians and Afrikaners as they’d be forced to integrate into the greater white population. A large Russian population would also develop a group consciousness distinct from and often in conflict with the majority white population. We’ve seen how that works in Canada where the substantial Ukrainian community, people not known for their egalitarianism towards other races, have pushed multiculturalism as hard as the Jews.