The Victory of the Borg:

The Victory of the Borg:
An Appreciation of Richard Faussette’s
Race and Religion a Catholic View

By

Robert E. Reis

When the Jews returned from their captivity in Babylon under Ezra their leaders recognized that they were returning to a polluted land. The foreign population had made it unclean from end to end with their “abominable practices”. From now on, the Jews were to follow a new tribal policy.

“Therefore do not give your daughters in marriage to their sons, and do not marry your sons to their daughters, and never seek their welfare or prosperity.”

The Victory of the Borg:
An Appreciation of Richard Faussette’s
Race and Religion a Catholic View

By

Robert E. Reis

When the Jews returned from their captivity in Babylon under Ezra their leaders recognized that they were returning to a polluted land. The foreign population had made it unclean from end to end with their “abominable practices”. From now on, the Jews were to follow a new tribal policy.

“Therefore do not give your daughters in marriage to their sons, and do not marry your sons to their daughters, and never seek their welfare or prosperity.”

Obedience to this policy was divinely guaranteed to make the Jews strong and ensure that the land would pass on to their descendents.  Ezra 9:11-13 [Italics added. RER]

What did the Jews consider to be “abominable practices”?

The Book of Leviticus, Chapter 18, tells us.

No man shall approach a blood relation for intercourse. I am the Lord. You shall not bring shame on your father by intercourse with your mother; she is your mother, you shall not bring shame upon her. You shall not have intercourse with your father’s wife; that is to bring shame upon your father. You shall not have intercourse with your sister, your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether brought up in the family or in another home; you shall not bring shame upon them. You shall not have intercourse with your son’s daughter or your daughter’s daughter: that is to bring shame upon your self…8 Leviticus 18:6-11

You shall not approach a woman to have intercourse with her during her period of menstruation. You shall not have sexual intercourse with the wife of your fellow countryman and so make yourself unclean with her. You shall not surrender any of your children to Moloch and thus profane the name of your God: I am the Lord. You shall not lie with a man as with a woman: that is an abomination. You shall not have sexual intercourse with any beast to make yourself unclean with it, nor shall a woman submit herself to intercourse with a beast: that is a violation of nature. 9
Leviticus 18:19-24

Richard Faussette asks us to examine the sexual prohibitions in Leviticus. He points out that engaging in any of the odious practices scatters the focus on family stability, reproduction and child rearing. They make sex an end for its own sake. He underlines that any family, tribe or nation that stops focusing on reproduction inevitably and necessarily must expect its population to decline.

Faussette tells us what life was like Ezra and other unknown Jewish leaders were composing and rewriting [and perhaps forging] the Jewish scriptures. Tribal extinction was an ever-present fear.

The Jews were living in a multitribal setting. Aggressive tribes mounted systematic attacks aimed at weakening the quantitative and qualitative reproductive success of their competitors.

Faussette describes intertribal warfare about the time the Temple was rebuilt in Jerusalem. It consisted of “murdering the finest of your own people who stood up to you and the same or a refined genocidal strategy for any people you conquered.”

When the Persians conquered islands in the Ionian Sea they castrated the best looking boys and kidnapped the best looking young women and sent them to the Persian king as slaves. They prevented the best of the conquered populations from reproducing. They “spewed” them out of the land. The Persians had other options. They could deport entire communities. They could forbid conquered males from acting in a masculine manner.

Strict observation of the rules in Leviticus ensured the survival of the tribe. They channeled male sexual energy so that a stable extended family would survive from generation to generation. “Practitioners fluidly navigate a cohesive network of family relations solidly connected to the parents who preceded them and the children who follow.”

Faussette has noticed a strange anomaly. As Sherlock Homes would note, the dog is not barking.

The Levitical prohibitions are from the Torah, Judaism’s holiest scriptures, yet except for a few ultra-Orthodox communities, most Jews seem strangely silent about these sexual prohibitions.  Again and again we see prominent non-Orthodox Jews in academia, business, government, the arts, and the media actively engaged in providing the intellectual and financial stimulus for countless initiatives nurturing homosexuality, abortion, feminism, and sexual promiscuity in general. These initiatives fly in the face of the prohibitions in Leviticus.

Faussette asks the crucial question. “Why isn’t non-orthodox Jewry concerned about being spewed out of the land?”

Dr. David Duke has provided a list Jewish people and organization that are not in accord with a literal understanding of Leviticus.

Jewish stars of radical feminism

*Heather Booth: abortion rights and civil rights activist
*Susan Brownmiller: author of Against Our Will, a groundbreaking book about rape
*Blu Greenberg: Orthodox feminist
*Phyllis Chesler: pioneer in the field of psychology of women
*Judy Chicago: feminist visual artist
*Sonia Pressman Fuentes: feminist lawyer and a founder of NOW
*Nancy Miriam Hawley: women’s health activist
*Alix Kates Shulman: feminist writer, author of egalitarian marriage agreement
*Gloria Steinem: a founder of Ms. magazine; feminist speaker and writer

Jewish stars of the homosexual organizations:

Larry Kramer—co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis
Alan Klein—co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Arnie Kantrowitz—co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jonathan D. Katz—founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].
Harvey Fierstein—film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.
Moisés Kaufman—playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
Israel Fishman—founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world’s first gay professional organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward Koch—both Jewish—the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974]. More in the Appendix.

The following leading Jewish organizations advocate for abortion “rights”:

* American Jewish Committee;
* American Jewish Congress;
* B’nai B’rith Women;
* Central Conference of American Rabbis [Reform];
* Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations;
* Hadassah Women;
* Jewish Labor Committee;
* Na’amat USA;
* National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods [Reform];
* National Council of Jewish Women;
* New Jewish Agenda;
* North American Temple Youth;
* Rabbinical Assembly;
* Union of American Hebrew Congregations [Reform];
* United Synagogues of America [Conservative];
* Women’s League for Conservative Judaism…”

My previous articles have discussed the prominent role of Jews in mainstreaming pornography in the United States.

To understand what is going on in the Jewish community, Richard Faussette describes the traditional social divisions in Indo-European communities and compares them with Jewish model.

Traditional Indo-European communities were divided into three classes by the roles they served in the society. Ancient Indian, ancient Iran, Greece, Rome and Celtic Gaul resembled on another. All were divided into priests, warriors, and producers. The priests maintained both the magical-religious and legal order. The warrior stratum was concerned with aggressive and defensive force. The last stratum embraced the herder/cultivators and the professionals/merchants.

The Jews in the Diaspora were organized differently in Europe during the Middle Ages. The priestly function was represented by the Orthodox communities. The warrior function was fulfilled by the Christian nobility. Work was reserved for the ordinary Christians.

Jewish communities were closed communities living within non-Jewish host nations. Jews ran their communities according to Jewish civil and criminal law.

Faussette errs when he assigns the abolition of the Jewish ghettos to the French Revolution.

The Austrian Emperor Joseph II began this transformation in 1782. He abolished most of the barriers between Jews and the other subjects of the Empire. He commanded the Jews to adopt first and last names in German, to use German in all official documents, to do military service, and to send their children to secular German speaking schools.

Faussette is correct that this Imperial decree and the later emancipation of the Jews by the French Constituent Assembly in 1791 did lead to a marked transformation in Jewish society.

Jews became fluent in German and French, flocked to the cities and entered new careers and professions.

Faussette reminds us that traditional Jewish society had been designed to produce intellectuals. Until emancipation the Jewish community produced rabbinical students and rabbis. Now an ever-growing proportion of these intellectuals were going into secular life. The thousand plus years old Jewish eugenic policy had paid off for the Ashkenazi Jews.

Faussette cites the The Bell Curve. “Jews in America and Britain have an overall IQ mean somewhere between a half and a full standard deviation above the mean, with the source of the differences concentrated in the verbal component.”

Faussette states, “Newly emancipated Jews who flocked to the cities after the French Revolution possessed the IQ potential to excel at anything they chose to do, with the ability to rise rapidly as a cohesive group in any social hierarchy they entered.”

The Jewish model of society changed. The priestly role is still represented by the Orthodox communities. The warrior role was now assigned to a new Jewish nobility. Productive work was relegated to non-Jews.
Faussette explains that the orthodox communities at the religious core modern Judaism ensure the continuity and adaptive fitness of the Jewish people. These communities follow the Levitical rules and produce offspring according to the traditional eugenic policy.

Faussette concludes that “modern non-orthodox Jewry is functionally free of the Levitical prohibitions. Their “sins” negatively affect only themselves and their immediate lines. In fact, the continuity and adaptive fitness of the Jewish people would not be threatened if all of non-Orthodox Jewry abandoned reproduction. The Jewish people will remain vitally aggressive and resilient in the face of demographic insult as long as the orthodox breeding communities scattered all over the world remain culturally and genetically segregated from society at large while maintaining high birth rates of superior offspring, as they have for thousands of years…Judaism is functionally complete and a host’s warrior class superfluous. [Italics added. RER]

Euromen have forgotten or have refused to take seriously the divine commands found in the Jewish Bible. Faussette stresses “the Lord’s consistent demand that the Israelites pull down the altars of indigenous peoples is fundamental in Judaism.” The same demand is made in the Old Covenant itself: “Be careful not to make a covenant with the natives of the land against which you are going, or they will prove a snare in your midst.  No: you shall demolish their altars, smash their sacred pillars and cut down their sacred poles.”  Exodus 34 (10-14

With a significant I.Q. advantage and the cohesion generated by their shared religious traditions and ethnicity, modern non-Orthodox Jews multiply rapidly and rise to positions of power and influence. But they face a problem. In every country indigenous peoples already occupy the land’s lucrative niches. The host population is standing in their way.

Faussette warn us that modern non-Orthodox Jews are religiously bred for superior intelligence. They have a sense of themselves as a Jewish nation, a Jewish race and a religious people uniquely worthy of survival, and destined for rule. They are “under enormous ecological pressures generated by the intense religiosity of their prolific core communities to appropriate the niches of indigenous peoples, and they eventually will—out of sheer aptitude, rising numbers and leveraged wealth.”

Modern non-Orthodox Jewry tends naturally to “a rapacious liberalism that subjects established host institutions everywhere to radical criticism and eventual disintegration.

Faussette underlines that modern non-Orthodox Jewry is functionally free of the Levitical prohibitions due to the religious zeal of their self-segregated and widely scattered orthodox breeding communities. He forsees that as the Orthodox core preserves its reproductive strategy, and the modern non-Orthodox Jews establish themselves in strength, our altars will come down.

Like E. Michael Jones, Richard Faussette is a churchgoing Roman Catholic. They both see that a culture war is taking place in those countries where Christian moral values were previously predominant. They both see the Jewish role in subverting the former moral cohesiveness in their hosts. They both point out the disastrous situation caused by the massive infiltration of the priesthood in United States by a homosexual mafia. They both recognise the subversion of the faculties of the Catholic universities by liberal mafia intent on transforming the Catholic universities into political correctness factories.

Faussette differs in that he sees the eventual extermination of the white population as a logical outcome of the complete replacement of whites in all the powerful niches in American society by non-Orthodox members of the Jewish genetic clustering of the Middle Eastern genetic clustering of the non-European genetic clustering of the Caucasian genetic clustering of the human species. He thinks this is a bad thing.

Posted by Robert Reis on Sunday, August 19, 2007 at 11:19 AM in
Comments (3) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Next entry: If you ever wondered what it was like

Previous entry: Epic Experience