‘The world is a business, Mr Beale.’

Posted by Alex on August 13, 2009, 01:37 PM | #

Regarding ‘the convergence’ of Capitalism and Marxism which produces the super-dystopia known as Multi-Culturalism, simply picture the merging of Dickens Hard Times with Orwell’s 1984.

The below is the mother of all outdoor Coke ads, a giant neon lit Coca-Cola bottle in Red China’s Shanghai.  A very Multi-Cultural picture indeed…

Posted by Alex on August 13, 2009, 02:04 PM | #

And speaking of the Coca-Cola corporation, they seemed to have had some time prior to 1976 a similar vision of the world as that described below.  The link is to a 1971 television commercial.

...And our children will live, Mr Beale, to see that ... perfect ... world in which there is no war nor famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company for whom all men will work to serve a common profit. In which all men will hold a share of stock. All necessities provided. All anxieties tranquilized. All boredom amused.

Posted by Revolution Harry on August 13, 2009, 03:48 PM | #

I think it’s far to say that China is the political ‘New World Order’ model the elites are working towards. Perhaps with a thin veneer of (false) democracy added. Socialism (Communism) for the masses and monopoly capitalism for the elite few. China is already a thoroughly controlled and brainwashed society. I think multiculturism is merely a technique being used to destroy the nations and national identity of the West. ‘Diversity’ is merely a variation on the old tactic of divide and rule. I’m sure they’ll be cranking up a bit of division in the near future with Islam being the primary foil. The plan appears to be to create as much chaos as possible (economic collapse, swine flu pandemic, conflict in the Middle East, if not outright World War) with the solution provided being a World Government. The hope is that there’ll be so much fear and demoralisation the New world Order will be welcomed with open arms. By those lucky enough to survive that is.

Those behind this are utterly evil.

Posted by Lurker on August 13, 2009, 04:51 PM | #

Seems to me one of the real triumphs of the globalizers is by using the immigration/anti-racism issue they have completely disarmed the left. The people who claim to be against multinational capitalism are completely blinsided when it comes to immigration. All their idealism regarding people, community and localism is totally invalidated by their stance on unlimited immigration.

Posted by James Bowery on August 13, 2009, 05:30 PM | #

Isn’t it axiomatic in the left that whites are to surrender in any conflict with them?  If so there is no conflict:  Whites are lower than animals, lower than plants, lower than rocks, so no ideals apply to whites.  They may only be granted temporary existence by virtue of working for the non-existence of whites—or if no one wants their land (no one including animals and plants and maybe pretty natural scenery like rocks).

The only real question is how that axiom made it into the zeitgeist of leftists.

Posted by sk on August 13, 2009, 07:42 PM | #

RevolutionHarry   Yes they are very evil.  If this can get through, and take hold ,it’s bound to have an effect, I think.  Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

ry evil. If this can get through to whites, both important and ordinary, it’s bound to have an effect.

Posted by Bill on August 14, 2009, 03:55 AM | #

The convergence of Capitalism and Marxism.  AKA - They’re all the same.

In some quarters (not a lot) there is increasing reference (as above) to the term ‘convergence of Capitalism and Marxism.’  I readily admit I struggle with this.  What does it mean and how did this alliance, compact, understanding, convergence, call it what you will, come about?  Is it permanent or of expedient opportunity.

Understand it or no, most people can see that ‘they’re all the same.’  A superficial scroll down any newspaper blog, even those with a perceived more aware readership will tell you that nearly all do not grasp there is a ‘convergence between left and right.’  This confusion occupies a great deal of column inches in the shape of Brown-Cameron, Cameron-Brown, the Red team-Blue team.

Such questions come to mind as, are Capitalists Conservative?  Have Conservatives ever been Capitalist?  I’ve always regarded big business as being the Conservative party.  The same goes for the Church as being seen as being the Conservative party at prayer.  But no more it seems, what is a progressive conservative for chrissake? (an oxymoron if ever there was)  Oh what a tangled web it all is. 

Anyway, people are mightily perplexed as to what the hell is going on?  But in characteristic fashion the smoke and mirror media is not going to enlighten them any time soon.

And there’s more.  The term ‘convergence of Capitalism and Communism’ is code for the huge scam being perpetrated on millions of decent people, duping them into thinking they actually have a political choice, a choice that they cling to as a drowning man clings to ship’s lifebelt.  Witness Obama-itis.

I call it the scam of illusion of choice, and it is a huge-huge road-block to progress, as the imminent election of progressive Cameron will testify.

MR is a terrific vehicle to get this sort of information across to the struggling visitor, (with face pressed up against the window.)  So why not have a headline post laying bear the convergence of Capitalism and Marxism ( Communism)

I for one, would more than welcome such a post.

Posted by John on August 14, 2009, 04:59 AM | #

MR is a terrific vehicle to get this sort of information across to the struggling visitor, (with face pressed up against the window.) So why not have a headline post laying bear the convergence of Capitalism and Marxism ( Communism)

One brilliant strategy of the capito-communists is to make each term a dirty word to the useful idiots in both camps, blinding either one to the most onerous parts of their own ideology and those parts of their own ideology that serve “the other side”.

Another thing they’ve done well is to kill or render useless any populist politican (Huey Long, Larry McDonald, Ross Perot, et. al.).

A related topic to incorporate in such a post or in a post of its own: “who funded communism”. Stuart Crane’s lectures are a good source for information on that topic.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 14, 2009, 09:53 AM | #

Bill, the convergence of capitalism and communism, or at least “banking” and communism, has been remarked on since Bakunin who made some wry and cutting comments on the underlying link between specifically the Marxist version of communism (a version he opposed) and international banking.  I used to have a good comment of his on this saved but my computers have gone through so many replacements and loss of saved stuff that I can’t locate it.  I just looked for it on Wikipedia under Bakunin’s biography but that outfit is, as is now generally understood, scrutinized in its every word by what can only be a volunteer army of Jews who edit the final product to make it SC (Semitically Correct), so this Bakunin statement on Marxism and banking naturally had to be excluded since it had undertones of spilling the beans where Jews and their shenannigans are concerned.  (The unmistakable mark of the Jewish Wiki-Sayans is seen in the Bakunin article toward the end where a section is devoted to his “anti-Semitism” and another to his “Eurocentrism,” which is like devoting a section of someone’s biography to to his belief that two plus two equals four and his habit of breathing.)  Bakunin was one of the first to remark on this deep sympathy between Marxian-type communism (Jewish-type communism, in other words — there are Euro types, such as that of Proudhon and that of Bakunin) and capitalism or, in the terminology of back then (Bakunin died in the 1870s), “international banking interests.”  In the U.S. it’s often remarked on in connection with the life and career of Jewish pro-communist businessman Armand Hammer who became fabulously wealthy through his business dealings with the then-Soviet Union which he supported to the hilt.  This underlying link between capitalism and Marxist-type communism is something I for one have never fully understood, so in that I stand with Bill:  I’m unable to really grasp how it works.  But too many strong thinkers have commented on the existence of such a link to seriously doubt it.  My own method of dealing with these seeming contradictions which I am unable to fully resolve or understand is to reject all the standard terminology which I can’t fully understand, such as conservative, liberal, progressive, and so on, and to start over from scratch with terminology I can understand from the get-go, after clearing it of all incomprehensible past baggage.  It is in that way that I have decided that there are two antagonistic groups, the normals and the degenerates.  Everyone understands what normal and degenerate are.  Our side, Bill, are the normals, and the other the degenerates.  If I have to go further I will call myself a progressive.  And so on.  That’s how I do it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 14, 2009, 10:07 AM | #

Let me quickly just add that to be among the political Normals one doesn’t have to be normal oneself, and to be among the political Degenerates one doesn’t have to be degenerate oneself.  For example, a homosexual isn’t normal (he’s a sexual pervert) but is among the political Normals if he wants what is normal to have ascendancy in society over what is degenerate.  If he wants what is degenerate to have ascendancy in society over what is normal, for example by supporting the homosexualist agenda (the mainstreaming of homosexuality and so forth), he’s a political Degenerate.  Likewise, a person who is not personally degenerate is a political Degenerate if he wants what is degenerate — partial birth abortion for example — to have ascendancy in society over what is normal.  And so on.  You personally can be degenerate and a political Normal depending on what you wish for society, and vice-versa:  you personally can be normal and be a political Degenerate.  A monster like Jeffrey Dahmer can theoretically be a political Normal depending on what he wants for society and a saint like Mother Theresa can theoretically be a political Degenerate depending on what he wants for society.  (Bear with me, I was just explaining a little how I see things there, freed of a lot of accumulated baggage I find incomprehensible.)

Posted by Bill on August 14, 2009, 02:43 PM | #

House of cards, chaos and all that.

I’ve lost count of the times I have cried Eureka when placing the final card on the top of the pile, only to find that the carefully constructed house came crashing down.  Hey-ho, back to the drawing board.

I think I have now reached the point where there is no point in trying to define what is the point of it all.  I’m living in a world that no longer exists, the values and norms that were fashioned in my childhood and youth during the ‘40’s and ‘50’s no longer exist, over the last 50 years those values have systematically and intentionally, been eroded and replaced with something else, something I am not privy to.  I find myself floundering in an ocean of confusion.

We now live in a time that is described as post modern and they say there is no longer such a thing as truth. I suspect that most who peruse this site have not quaffed the post modern Kool-Aid and are as puzzled as me.  Speaking for myself, it soon became apparent that as I progressed in my search for answers I was stranded in a confused post modern world that had been turned on its head.

It was declared Left and Right politics was no more, and if indeed this was true, then what had taken its place? 

Has Capitalism turned into an Ideology? (Has it always been an ideology?) What has Capitalism got in common with cultural Marxism?

Unrestricted freedom for both sides to pursue their aims seems to be the lowest common denominator.  You scratch my back I’ll scratch yours.

It also seems that both now demand rejection of tradition and loyalties.  This was never the Conservative case before, why do Conservatives now demand rejection of the past?  Surely, if this so, then Conservatives are no longer Conservative.  Rejection of tribe, loyalty, tradition was never Conservatives bag.

It is interesting to note that Blair/Brown and new Labour have rejected socialism and Cameron has rejected Conservatism, thereby creating a vacuum that only nationalism can fill - and is doing so.

In the meantime this three wheeled wagon continues to career on it’s post modern pot-holed journey -  with millions gaping, wondering where it will all end up.  (In tears I say) 

21st century politics in Britain has changed everything and all is in chaos.  People are confused and nothing works.  Phantom terrorism, political correctness, and things racial dominate.  Our economic system is in free fall, our armed forces are dying in a meaningless war in a meaningless place, over a million of our young people are running loose on the streets, social engineering is producing the very problem it is trying to eliminate and the beat goes on.

Welcome to the brave new Liberal post modern world.

Posted by Revolution Harry on August 14, 2009, 03:54 PM | #

Bill, I think this article has a good grasp of what’s going on. Here are a few snippets.

“Corporatists of left, right and centre show a marked hostility to allegations that the European Union is fundamentally fascist. This is perhaps not surprising since they combine in their belief in supranational government, collective solutions, corporatist economics, State intervention and what Tony Blair often termed the “Third Way” most of the characteristics of fascism. 
 
They must therefore seek to distance themselves from that discredited ideology. This is made easier if they can find an enemy to whom they can ascribe the values of “fascism” ­ they choose nationalists and those they term “the extreme right”.

“Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.
 
Isn’t this what they are doing across Europe. Wake up people, before it’s just too late.”

This article is worth a read as well.

Here’s one more to have a look at.

“In our formula, Thesis is the Capitalist economies of the West, while Antithesis is the Communist economies of the East, and Synthesis is the Fascist economy of the New World Order.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 14, 2009, 04:50 PM | #

“both [sides] now demand rejection of tradition and loyalties.  This was never the Conservative case before, why do Conservatives now demand rejection of the past?”  (—Bill)

It’s worse than that, the Conservatives/Tories are now fully on-board the race-replacement train.  They’ve accepted the “need” for the British people to change race from white to non-white and Cameron has shown every sign he intends to pursue that as a goal very aggressively.  So, if you vote for Labour you get forced race-replacement, and if you vote for the Tories you get .... you guessed it!  Forced race-replacement!  George Bush was “a conservative” and did exactly the same thing.  At the start of Bush’s term, during 2001 and 2002, I assumed it was Karl Rove making those pro-race-replacement policy decisions.  Slowly but surely it dawned on me that no, the conservatives wanted race-replacement.  No need to invoke “Karl Rove’s influence” when Bush himself wanted it.  And his father in retrospect wanted it too, I saw that for the first time.  And so did 2004’s “Mister Conservative” himself, Newt Gingrich.  And so did/do all the rest of them. 

So, what’s conservative? 

Dunno, but it sure as hell ain’t what I am.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 14, 2009, 04:56 PM | #

“so did 2004’s ‘Mister Conservative’ himself, Newt Gingrich.”

Excuse me, he was “Mister Conservative” in 1994, not 2004.  But 1994 or 2004, you can take whatever he stood for and shove it.

Posted by Bill on August 15, 2009, 04:03 AM | #

Thanks Fred Thanks Harry.

Harry, only the last link worked I’m afraid.

From Harry’s link

….. he will “cleanse” the Earth of all undesirables, of those people who are “unworthy of life”. The only peoples who will be allowed to live will be the Chinese and White Europeans! At this point, the population of the world will be down to its goal of 2 billion…

From Fred

It’s worse than that, the Conservatives/Tories are now fully on-board the race-replacement train.  They’ve accepted the “need” for the British people to change race from white to non-white and Cameron has shown every sign he intends to pursue that as a goal very aggressively

Confusion - see what I mean.  Here’s something else and easy to read as well.

Is capitalism conservative any more?

http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/articles/capcon.html

Posted by Guessedworker on August 15, 2009, 04:45 AM | #

“Im not going to take this anymore”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4zPzpbgot8&feature=channel

Hazel Blears was one of the prime-movers of the Labour “doorstep strategy”.  Here’s one of her Guardian puffs on the subject.  The subbie wrote a by-line that was truer than he thought:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/02/hazel-blears-labour-gordon-brown

Posted by Al Ross on August 15, 2009, 05:23 AM | #

Capitalism participation is an intellectual exercise.  Some races do much better than others and it has, generally speaking, served Aryans well. We must always remember that it is wealth that requires explanation. Poverty is natural.

Posted by Bill on August 15, 2009, 07:59 AM | #

Rather than link this, I copy it in its entirety.  This is unashamedly filched from Simon Heffer’s column in today’s Telegraph.  It was posted by UK Debt Slave on August 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/simonheffer/6030701/David-Cameron-and-George-Osborne-offer-progress—-but-in-the-wrong-direction.html

I’m trying to think of a suitable title.  No leave it as it is…....

“Progressive”

This has become the most terrifying word in the English language.

What does it mean?

1. Wealth redistribution…..

But not from the rich. No…

It means raping the middle class and reducing everyone to the same level…...SERFDOM

(Except for the rich the powerful of course. They end up with EVERYTHING).

Main weapon here is manipulation of the money supply by the Bank of England with the full connaivance of government. They engineered the current financial crisis by deliberately creating the biggest credit bubble in history. There’s much worse to come on the economic front…MUCH worse.

The primary weapon being used to destroy society by these dark forces is DEBT, national and personal. It’s all an illusion. Most of the debt doesn’t exist because they are not lending you anything. Bank credit is created out of thin air. You spend your entire lives enslaved by a bookkeeping entry in a bank ledger. That’s all a credit agreement is! They have NOT lent you someone else’s money. Debt under our monetary system is a fiction.

You need to understand the function of the Central Bank and the concepts of fractional reserve banking. It’s FRAUD on a gigantic scale.

2. Allegiance to globalist plans towards ever more centralised power and eventually single world governmnet. Ken Clark and George Osborrne are both Bilderberg regulars. They are the true power brokers in the Conservative party.

3. Corruption of democracy and the political system.

In case you hadn’t noticed, there’s really no difference between the Labour party and the Conservtives. People talk about a drift towards ‘centre left’ and ‘centre right’ politics. All hokum.

Both sides of the house have drifted towards an extreme form of ‘Corporate Socialism.’ This is a bastardized ideology masquerading as capitalism but it is absolutely NOT founded in free market or traditional capitaist ideology. For a start THERE IS NO CAPITAL!

I repeat…

THERE IS NO CAPITAL!

We are living in a totally debt based monetary system. Most people have no capital whatsoever. We are engaged in a game of Monopoly where the person nominated to be banker can print infinite money out of thin air…..an then stop printing it altogether. It’s a rigged game. The rich get fatter because they have access to these funds before inflation kills the spending power of money. We are still in the deflationary cycle right now. The Weimar Republic Hyperinflation will come later. We are being asset stripped and we don’t even realize it. Our pensions and savings will rendered worthless. We will be homeless and destitute. This is the New World Order Gordon Brown so admires.

The political system is illusury. You are supposed to believe you have CHOICES.

You have no choice

You have owners

They own you. They own everything

You are a mere battery hen with a wallet full of credit cards.

Forget the Conservatives. Don’t even imagine they will change anything because they wont, indeed they can’t because our political system has been hijacked by corporatism and ‘big money’ interests.

4. Infiltration and destruction of public institutions with cultural terrorism, multiculturalism, political correctness, etc

5. Destruction of industrial and manufacturing capacity. Real wealth creation has to be destroyed. under this system so we have witnessed the UK (and America’s) industrial base offshored for 40 years without ever questioning it.

6. Control of the media, particularly the state owned BBC which has now been reduced to a propaganda channel. It does not report accurate news and all investigative ‘journalism’ is slanted towards the ambitions of the state.

7. FEAR!

CCTV cameras in every street, council snoopers, fictional debts, unemployment, house repossessions, ‘wars on terror’ and the biggest porker of them all…...

GLOBAL WARMING!

The fear brianwashing machine starts early. They show Al Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth, to school kids without ever presenting any alternative theses. What a great start in life for you kids.

8. Destroying ancient freedoms, liberties and our systems of law.

Read up about the Bill of Rights and Magna Carta. It will all be gone completely very soon and our old laws will have been utterly usurped by European civil law, corpus juris, etc.

The legal system, obviously to anyone who is familiar with it, is not designed to uphold the law anymore. It is a revenue collection service for the state. It’s primary role has been replaced from upholding the law to extracting huge sums of money from the people for ridiculous non crimes like speeding.

9.Giving local councils revenue raising powers to rape the people.

Council tax
Parking fines
Leaving the lid on your wheelie bin ajar
Dropping a cigarette end in the street

Etc etc etc, you get the drift.

Folks. You need to wake up and accept that your democracy, your freedoms and liberties have been flushed down the toilet. It doesn’t matter who you vote for next year because you’re going to get more of the same. Nothing will change unless the people stop believing the fairy tale that our elected representatives are there to serve the people, because they aren’t.

Posted by Michael on August 15, 2009, 08:54 AM | #

The amalgamation of Capitalism and Communism is something I’ve been interested in for awhile. It wasn’t just Armand Hammer - even Henry Ford had a concession in the former Soviet Union. What Capitalists like about Communist states is that, following the destruction of traditional society by Marxism, the elevation of materialism above all, and the impoverishment of the people, the Capitalists have a perfect opportunity - a deracinated society, cheap labour, a compliant populace where dissent is discouraged - to pick up the pieces after the inevitable failure of pure Communism. It’s really the ideal world for Capitalists, isn’t it? Workers go to work, they consume, they enjoy mindless entertainment, they do what the elites say, and they keep their mouths shut and don’t speak up about anything important. Just like China, which the Capitalists have been drooling over ever since Mao cut a deal with Kissinger/Rockefeller in the early 70s.

Posted by Michael on August 15, 2009, 08:58 AM | #

I think multiculturism is merely a technique being used to destroy the nations and national identity of the West. ‘Diversity’ is merely a variation on the old tactic of divide and rule.

That’s part of it, but the main reason this madness is being promoted is to harmonise multiple nations into a single jurisdiction, a state, which will be controlled by a very small number of people. With no popular sovereignty, no accountability, in fact no cultural identity, knowledge or awareness, people will be bereft of any means by which they might regain control over their communities. A world state, even a socialistic one, is exactly what the Capitalists are working towards.

Posted by Armor on August 15, 2009, 10:04 AM | #

the Conservatives/Tories are now fully on-board the race-replacement train.  They’ve accepted the “need” for the British people to change race from white to non-white (—Fred Scrooby)

You have to decide whether it is a change or a replacement !
According to the mass media, what’s happening is demographic change.
But I think demographic replacement is the right word. White people are not changing at all.

The convergence of Capitalism and Marxism.  AKA - They’re all the same. (—Bill)

You could also mention the divergence between normal people (including many low-level politicians) and mainstream political party leaders. Most voters, both left and right, oppose mass immigration, even though they keep voting for traitors. The convergence of right and left towards the race-replacement ideology has mainly happened at the top, among political party leaders. Instead of seeing it as a conquest of conservative institutions by the extreme-left, I see it as an infiltration of both sides by an anti-white ideology. Basically, the political hierarchy has been bought off. Is it only Jewish money? I don’t know! But there is nothing left-wing about race-replacement and anti-white activism.

A dictionary definition of the Left : “Those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare”

Well, race replacement is not the way to promote public welfare. We can find many other definitions of the “left”, and none of them is compatible with race-replacement. Of course, race replacement is not a conservative ideology either. So, in the end, what matters is not so much the professed ideology, left-wing or right-wing, but practical questions: who controls the top politicians, who controls the mass media, who are the top financial contributors, what is their ethnicity…

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 15, 2009, 10:30 AM | #

Skimming the readers’ comments thread linked by Bill a few posts above, I happened on this:

As gay men living in Scotland we have found the homophobic hyenas screeching their vitriolic anti-gay hatred at David, since he came out and admitted he was bi and apologised for the Tory gay-bashing years, as predictable and typical of your readers.  You will never get us on our knees with our backs to the wall again.  We don’t have to hide in the bushes and keep our heads down for any Tories. […]

Denis and Jamie, Glasgow on August 15, 2009 at 01:28 PM

I didn not know the Karma Chameleon was an “out” homosexual.  That all by itself probably explains part of his behavior, especially his on-boardness with Blairism.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 15, 2009, 11:10 AM | #

“Instead of seeing it as a conquest of conservative institutions by the extreme-left, I see it as an infiltration of both sides by an anti-white ideology.  Basically, the political hierarchy has been bought off.  Is it only Jewish money?  I don’t know!  But there is nothing left-wing about race-replacement and anti-white activism. [...] Of course, race replacement is not a conservative ideology either.  So, in the end, what matters is not so much the professed ideology, left-wing or right-wing, but practical questions:  who controls the top politicians, who controls the mass media, who are the top financial contributors, what is their ethnicity?…”  (—Armor)

Bullseye.  Dead-center.  Notice this analysis of Armor’s doesn’t touch on “philosophy” in the slightest, but addresses the pure and obvious mechanics of political control in the present epoch:  as Steven Palese said, “Something’s blocking the democratic process,” something we can’t directly see because it doesn’t directly show itself, and that something is what Armor is looking for in noting that “the political hierarchy has been bought off”:  who, exactly, was the purchaser?  That, and not any need for “a new philosophy for our side,” is the question.  Does anyone think the purchasers are philosophers, and does anyone think they’re going to be undone by confronting them with “a new philosophy that supports our side”?  These men have money and they use it to buy what they want.  Period.  They’ve bought the United States by buying the process, they’ve bought Britain and France, and through those purchases they control the rest of the Eurosphere via American power mainly but Brit and French power too.  They haven’t directly bought Germany but control it easily via their control of the levers of U.S. power.  Belgium, Holland, Norway, recently Iceland, and the others are merely dominoes that fall into line. 

Clearly the Jews are very heavily involved — and involved specifically as members of the Jewish tribe, not solely as generic capitalist pigs:  their membership in the Jewish tribe makes them desire to bring Euro peoples, societies, and nations down for tribal reasons of jealousy/envy of Euros, tribal reasons of dislike of Euros amounting in some ways to outright genocidal loathing, and tribal reasons of fear of Euros — but exactly where the Jews leave off and the goy capitalist pigs (also clearly involved of course) begin isn’t clear.  There’s a comment in one of Ezra Pound’s wartime radio speeches to the effect that Jewish and goy bankers in the U.K. are so entwined as a cause of what was going on that he wouldn’t even want to try to disentangle the two. 

I apportion Jewish-goy blame something like, respectively, 70-80 to 20-30 Jews to Eurogoys.  The Jews however are the main players, movers and shakers, blood-suckers, and ring-leaders.

They are by far the main cause.

Posted by Revolution Harry on August 15, 2009, 01:28 PM | #

Sorry Bill, not sure what happened there. Here they are again.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17250873/The-Corporatists

http://www.mail-archive.com/cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com/msg11606.html

Posted by Bill on August 15, 2009, 03:42 PM | #

OK Harry, much appreciated.  All interesting stuff.

Posted by Rhys on August 15, 2009, 06:37 PM | #

Fred, I agree. I’ve learnt a lot from this site, and I’ve learnt a lot from reading GW, but (and maybe I just haven’t been around long enough) I still do not understand GW’s call for “a new philosophy”. Our enemies have their intellectuals and their think tanks (all of which our side would no doubt benefit our side), but I do not see that they have a “philosophy” that we need to combat. What they have is raw power; what they have are whatever propaganda lies come in handy and the means to spread them.

As an aside (though not wholly unrelated), I see the BNP site is down again.

Posted by Bill on August 16, 2009, 07:00 AM | #

Town Hall politics is spook’n Obama backers.

Health Care ain’t what it says on the tin, it’s about them durn useless eaters.

It’s a bit long @one hour, just nudge the sound line along - interesting @ 9.45

http://www.larouchepub.com/radio/index.html

PS Why are MR er’s from across the pond so quiet on this one?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 16, 2009, 10:56 AM | #

“Why are MR er’s from across the pond so quiet on this one?”  (—Bill)

Bill, it’s being discussed right now over at Prozium’s, a site very similar in outlook to MR and whose readership and commenters are very similar to ours in their thinking (many of them the same guys). 

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/08/14/imagine-2050/

To get a feel for the views, read the comments too, not just the log entry.

Bottom line (and I believe you will find this true in Britain too, as the population there becomes racially more and more heterogeneous):  nationalized health care and socialism in general (I for one have always been inclined to favor a soft-socialism) have a chance of working only where a population of whites is racially/ethnoculturally homogeneous, not where it is no longer all white but has become racially/ethnoculturally heterogeneous.  You can’t have a workable national health care system (intrinsically a good idea in my view) without racial/ethnocultural homogeneity of the nation.

Posted by Mark Ijsseldijk on August 16, 2009, 11:34 AM | #

Not to be a “Third Reich hobbyist” (thank you, Mr. Dare) but I made the point last night at Prozium’s that NS involved an extensive welfare state which worked magnificently.  But like Fred Scrooby says this was possible because of the racially homogeneous nature of NS Germany not to mention the astounding productivity of the German people.  It couldn’t work here in America what with the mud floods whose dead weight we’ll have to prop up.

Posted by Bill on August 16, 2009, 02:11 PM | #

Fred August 16, 2009, 02:56 PM I agree.

I can’t help wondering if our National Health Service (1948?) didn’t soon become a pilot scheme for Race Replacement.  I think it was in the ‘50’s that white NHS staff started to be supplemented by non whites from Britain’s colonies, in this case West Indies.

Of course the spin, even back then was they were here do do the jobs the British wouldn’t do.  I was too young back then to be interested so cannot verify this at even at an anecdotal level.  There has been a steady flow of non whites into the NHS ever since.  Of course it would be incorrect to query what percentage of NHS staff is non white in to day’s NHS.

As I say, I cannot help wondering if the NHS has not been used as the guinea pig experiment for wider considerations.  Why couldn’t the government have brought in a temporary National Service (men and women) to fill the gap until they could see what was what in that post war settling down period?

Even today, with millions of Britons of all ages non economically active, Gavin Esler BBC News night anchor man asked recently, who would empty your bedpan if it wasn’t for these people?

During my life I have required the services of the NHS several times, (not hospitalised) my verdict is the quality of service has been adequate without being spectacular.  It is a huge huge bureaucracy exponentially soaking up billions and is contributing to our path to bankruptcy.  How much is due to to the chaos of liberalism is any one’s guess.  Recently I saw it has been announced that Travellers are to be fast tracked for medical and dental treatment.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193810/Want-GP-Gipsies-come-NHS-tells-doctors-travellers-seen-straight-away.html

The tales of Blair/Browns smoke and mirrors in a target driven NHS is legion - same old, same old.

Socialised medical treatment inevitably moves down the path to industrial scale conveyor belt thinking (endless waiting) but somewhere buried is compassion - it seems to work.  It’s certainly better than nothing - but for how much longer?

In Britain, it seems to have become fashionable that if you want to cash in your chips you can buy a one way ticket to a Swiss clininic for a modest fee.  Maybe that’s the way things are going.

Posted by sk on August 16, 2009, 03:07 PM | #

RACE REPLACEMENT is a euphamism for GENOCIDE. It’s not about trading places or moving on, it’s GENOCIDE and it’s permanent.Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Posted by Bill on August 16, 2009, 03:37 PM | #

Thanks Fred for signposting Prozium, he is certainly producing some sparkling stuff these days.

The American white seems to be saying he doesn’t want to contribute to the race replacement programme by redistribution, but that’s what we’re doing all the time.  They’re making us buy the rope they’re going to hang us with.  Talk about having a boot stamped on your face.

The RR programme must be being funded by the IMF, no one individual nation could raise revenues sufficient to bank roll such a programme.  Quantitative Easing (printing money) is now normal practice, there’s no such thing now as balancing the books.  I’m lost when it comes to economics but even I can see that immigration figures high in this latest economic crisis.  Especially here in Britain.

Where do you draw the line between balls out socialism and safety net capitalism?  Tough one.

Not that it matters any more, times are a-changing, all this is very yesterday according to the NWO boys, there’s stuff coming down the pike (as Mr Watt says) that is relegating all this to the land of the Dodo.

Posted by Q on September 01, 2009, 10:18 PM | #

Dollar destined to be second class currency in world’s largest banana republic
September 1, 2009

Analysis of: The Dollar’s Fate
Published at: www.nytimes.com
Request a Consultation with Michael Lynch

Summary

“Professor of History Kennedy notes debate about the reserve status of the U.S. Dollar. The issue arose at the G-20 meeting in London in April and again in Yekaterinburg two months later when Brazil, Russia, China and India discussed shifting out of the dollar. Italian scholar Antonio Mosconi wrote in ” The World Supremacy of the Dollar at the Rendering (1917-2008)” that the dollar is the currency of the “empire of debt” and as such, is in its last convulsion. This crisis is not like the others.

Learn what Gerson Lehrman Group can do for you

Analysis

The mainspring of the American commercial and industrial system is broken. If it is not repaired, and soon, the general economy will continue to spiral down into lethargy. This will inevitably lead to political consequences now only dimly foreseen. The town hall demonstrations during the congressional summer recess were subtle indications that Americans are beginning to realize that the functionaries cannot cope with the gathering storm. The eye of this awesome turbulence now looming well above the horizon is the ruined U.S. Treasury. Plans to run the national debt up to $9 billion by 2019 have catastrophic dimensions. With a currency that has no future, the political game cannot long go on. The only exit strategy remaining now is default which the government is reluctant to embrace (to say the least). The current financial philosophy leads to eventual chaos. Default, of course, has its own peculiar consequences. The greatest one is that the U.S.A. immediately loses superpower status and is reduced to the role of banana republic. Little consolation can derive from the fact that it will be the world’s largest such state. Without the ability to finance anything, American foreign policy will become fiction, domestic policy will amount to oratory without substance. The American people will quickly tire of the moribund federal government and replace it with one that can be more easily controlled. It is difficult to say exactly what form the new government might be. Perhaps a unicameral legislature composed of the several governors with a governor-in-chief of brief and limited power. The citizenry would formally or tacitly bring into being their powers of political assassination, popular political tools in all of the BRIC countries. But however the political questions are resolved, the fundamental economic, commercial and industrial issues would remain. Obviously in a world where foreign currencies are supreme, implications for the laboring classes are severe. A possibility is to forgo the concept of “internationalization” and revert to a closed system where there are neither imports nor exports. The citizens make an economy based upon what can be produced domestically. Implications for transportation, energy and industry are obvious. If the American system continues to drift, as it seems certain to do, then Brazil, Russia, India and China, and others will take whatever steps are necessary to pull their own systems back from the abyss (which they are now clearly doing). From this will emerge an international system of trade with the U.S.A. largely excluded unless gold is used to pay for transactions. When the gold is gone, international transactions cease. None of the above suggests that the world is coming to an end. The Soviet Union, for much of its 70 year tenure was not a world power. Modern Russia is still a work-in-progress. China, only now, is coming into its own. India has unrealized potential. Brazil, with great oil potential promises to be a power for years. The European Union will prosper. Life will go on, even for Americans, but their standards of living will decrease as the dollar fades.”

Michael Lynch consults with leading institutions through GLG

Posted by Lurker on September 02, 2009, 01:21 AM | #

Brazil, with great oil potential promises to be a power for years.

Like oil-rich Nigeria?

Posted by torgrim on September 02, 2009, 03:04 AM | #

From, The Dollar’s Fate;

“Life will go on even for Americans, but their standards of living will decrease as the Dollar fades.”

And as it is said, “how goes California so goes the Nation”....

Here is just one example of the on-going wealth transfer from the middle class to the (“overseers”,as in global plantation and serfdom), next in line to be stolen are our Commons, known today as Parks. I can imagine the board rooms, cocktail dinners, conversations turning to the subject of the common man and his Common Land…and saying things like, ” what a waste of land, look what could be built on say, Angel Island in the middle of SF Bay, a Hotel, or better yet a casino, how dare the commoner think he can have open land, the impudence!”

The commenters toward the end of the comment section pick up on the very real possibility that our Parks are about to be sold to the highest bidder! Here it comes, wait for it, the favorite utterance of the Neo-Cons…., Privatization..
http://www.sacbee.com/288/story/2148096.html?mi_rss=Bee State News

Posted by Q on September 02, 2009, 08:32 AM | #

Here is just one example of the on-going wealth transfer from the middle class to the (“overseers”,as in global plantation and serfdom), next in line to be stolen are our Commons, known today as Parks.

In addition to selling off the Parks, there’s little doubt countries such as China and Japan whom are buying our debt will want that debt collateralized. I’m afraid the desperate pols will use Federal Land as the collateral.

Here is a map of land owned by the Federal Government:

http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/291-federal-lands-in-the-us/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Obviously in a world where foreign currencies are supreme, implications for the laboring classes are severe. A possibility is to forgo the concept of “internationalization” and revert to a closed system where there are neither imports nor exports. The citizens make an economy based upon what can be produced domestically. Implications for transportation, energy and industry are obvious.

If these conditions become a reality in the U.S., then microcomunities will become a practical necessity for working-class whites in order to survive. The form of microcommunities will depend on whether the group forming them are in an urban or rural setting, of course. However, I’m certain the government, in order to stay solvent and remain a leading economic power on the world stage, will inevitably go forth with their plans to institute the NAU (North American Union) and issue a new currency - the Amero.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Brazil, with great oil potential promises to be a power for years.

Like oil-rich Nigeria?—Lurker

Not a valid comparison.

Demographically, Nigeria is almost 100% Negro (majority of which are Muslim) with a tiny population of whites there as technical support.  They direct the construction of the infrastructure and keep it up and running. 

Brazil, though a, multicultural/multiracial cesspool, is a 50% white/ 90% Christian country.

Contrast the differences vis a vis Nigeria and Brazil:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nigeria

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazil

Posted by torgrim on September 02, 2009, 05:47 PM | #

Q, said; “Selling off parks, there’s little doubt countries like China and Japan whom are buying our debt will want the debt collateralized”....

Yes, and just think of those large commissions to be made, or how about our hard earned infrastructure, built by those that could and would.
Speaking of which, just yesterday, a ship ran aground up against an ageing levee in the Sacramento River Channel and came close to destroying a part of the water supply for So. Cal and about 22 million people, when salt water was about to be released into the Delta Fresh Water Project. Only luck staved off a disaster.

As to the issue of the Federal lands, I have no doubt that the fat, stubby fingers/soft hands are rubbing together as I write, just waiting to, “not let a crisis go unwasted, asf”